Comparative Effects of Losartan and Enalapril on Exercise Capacity and Clinical Status in Patients With Heart Failure

Objectives. This study was designed to determine 1) whether 12-week oral administration of losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, in patients with heart failure is well tolerated; and 2) whether functional capacity and clinical status of patients with heart failure in whom treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor is replaced with losartan for 12 weeks will remain similar to that noted in patients in whom treatment with an ACE inhibitor is continued.Background. Losartan is a specific, nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist. Although specific receptor blockade with losartan has certain theoretic advantages over nonspecific ACE inhibition, definitive demonstration of comparable effects in patients with congestive heart failure is lacking.Methods. A double-blind, multicenter, randomized, parallel, enalapril-controlled study was conducted in 116 patients with congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association functional classes II to IV) and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% previously treated with stable doses of ACE inhibitors and diuretic agents, with or without concurrent digitalis and other vasodilators. After a baseline exercise period, open-label ACE inhibitors were discontinued, and patients were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of therapy with losartan, 25 mg/day (n = 38); losartan, 50 mg/day (n = 40); or enalapril, 20 mg/day (n = 38). Drug efficacy was evaluated by changes in maximal treadmill exercise time (using a modified Naughton protocol), 6-min walk test, left ventricular ejection fraction and dyspnea-fatigue index. Safety was measured by the incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse experiences.Results. The treadmill exercise time and the 6-min walk test did not change significantly after replacement of ACE inhibitor therapy with losartan. Similarly, a significant change was not observed in either the dyspnea-fatigue index or left ventricular ejection fraction at the end of double-blind period relative to baseline.Conclusions. Losartan was generally well tolerated and comparable to enalapril in terms of exercise tolerance in this short-term (12-week) study of patients with heart failure. The clinical effects of long-term angiotensin II receptor blockade compared with ACE inhibition remain to be studied.     

Reversible renal failure after combined treatment with enalapril and frusemide in a patient with congestive heart failure

A patient with congestive heart failure and moderate renal insufficiency developed severe reversible non-oliguric renal failure while on frusemide and enalapril. Renal failure developed when enalapril was given in the presence of pronounced sodium depletion. When positive sodium balance was restored the plasma creatinine concentration began to fall while angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition remained effective and blood pressure was stable. These observations suggest that the degree of sodium depletion plays an important role in the tendency for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors to induce renal failure in patients with congestive heart failure and moderate renal insufficiency. Restoration of a positive sodium balance promotes the recovery of renal function after the combined administration of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics.     

Reversible renal failure after combined treatment with enalapril and frusemide in a patient with congestive heart failure.

A patient with congestive heart failure and moderate renal insufficiency developed severe reversible non-oliguric renal failure while on frusemide and enalapril. Renal failure developed when enalapril was given in the presence of pronounced sodium depletion. When positive sodium balance was restored the plasma creatinine concentration began to fall while angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition remained effective and blood pressure was stable. These observations suggest that the degree of sodium depletion plays an important role in the tendency for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors to induce renal failure in patients with congestive heart failure and moderate renal insufficiency. Restoration of a positive sodium balance promotes the recovery of renal function after the combined administration of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics.     

First dose hypotension with enalapril and prazosin in congestive heart failure

Since the introduction of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors into the adjunctive treatment of patients with congestive heart failure, cases of severe hypotension, especially on the first day of treatment, have occasionally been reported. To assess the safety of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril a multicenter, open, randomized, prazosin-controlled trial was designed comparing the incidence and severity of symptomatic hypotension on the first day of treatment. Trial medication was 2.5 mg enalapril or 0.5 mg prazosin. Subjects were 1210 inpatients with New York Heart Association functional class (I)/II and III who were not adequately compensated with digitalis and/or diuretics. In the group receiving enalapril, 3 patients (0.5%) experienced severe hypotension on day 1 and 28 patients (4.7%) moderate hypotension. In those given prazosin, 15 patients (2.6%) experienced severe hypotension and 60 patients (10.3%) moderate hypotension. The difference is statistically significant (P less than or equal to 0.000012). All patients recovered. It was concluded that treatment of patients suffering from congestive heart failure New York Heart Association functional class (I)/II or III with enalapril is comparably well tolerated.     

Efficacy of ACE inhibitors and ATII receptor blockers in patients with microalbuminuria: a prospective study

We compared the efficacy of treatment protocols with an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor alone (enalapril, 5 mg) or angiotensin II (ATII) receptor blocker (losartan, 50 mg) or both enalapril plus losartan in patients with microalbuminuria in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Normotensive type 2 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria documented by at least 3 consecutive urinary albumin excretion analyses were recruited for the study. Patients were grouped randomly into one of the protocols which consisted of treatment with 5 mg enalapril daily (group 1; n=12), 50 losartan daily (group 2; n=12) or both drugs (group 3; n=10). They were reevaluated with regard to HbA1c levels, lipid profiles, blood pressure and urinary albumin excretion rates (UAER) at 3-month intervals for 12 months. Mean age, duration of diabetes, body mass index, plasma lipid profiles and blood pressure levels were similar at the initial visit. In group 1, UAER returned to normal levels in 10 patients. Normalization of UAER occurred in 8 and 7 patients in groups 2 and 3, respectively. Percentage of reduction in UAERs at the end of 12 months were 58%, 59% and 60% (p=0.0001; p=0.0002; p=0.0003, respectively). The amount of reduction in UAER did not differ significantly among the three groups (p=0.346). ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers have similar efficacy in treating diabetic microalbuminuria, and the combination of the two drugs does not add any further benefit. Received: October 2000 / Accepted in revised form: 27 September 2001     

Controlled trial of enalapril in congestive cardiac failure

Twenty five patients with chronic congestive cardiac failure had enalapril (n = 13) or placebo (n = 12) added to their existing regimen of digoxin and frusemide in a randomised double blind trial. Four hours after the first 5 mg dose, the enalapril group showed significant falls in blood pressure, heart rate, and concentrations of plasma angiotensin II, angiotensin converting enzyme, and noradrenaline. During the 12 week trial heart failure became worse in one enalapril treated patient (8%) and in seven placebo treated patients (58%). There were no significant changes in cardiac ejection fraction or exercise duration in either group. Plasma noradrenaline response to graded exercise and maximum exercise rate-pressure product were significantly reduced after four and 12 weeks of active treatment but unchanged with placebo treatment. There was a sustained increase in plasma potassium and a slight rise in plasma creatinine in the enalapril group. Plasma concentrations of the active drug, enalaprilate, were dose related and log enalaprilate correlated significantly with percentage of plasma angiotensin converting enzyme activity (r = -0.66). Enalapril was well tolerated and produced no adverse effects. The drug appears to be superior to placebo and offers considerable promise for the treatment of this condition.     

Controlled trial of enalapril in congestive cardiac failure.

Twenty five patients with chronic congestive cardiac failure had enalapril (n = 13) or placebo (n = 12) added to their existing regimen of digoxin and frusemide in a randomised double blind trial. Four hours after the first 5 mg dose, the enalapril group showed significant falls in blood pressure, heart rate, and concentrations of plasma angiotensin II, angiotensin converting enzyme, and noradrenaline. During the 12 week trial heart failure became worse in one enalapril treated patient (8%) and in seven placebo treated patients (58%). There were no significant changes in cardiac ejection fraction or exercise duration in either group. Plasma noradrenaline response to graded exercise and maximum exercise rate-pressure product were significantly reduced after four and 12 weeks of active treatment but unchanged with placebo treatment. There was a sustained increase in plasma potassium and a slight rise in plasma creatinine in the enalapril group. Plasma concentrations of the active drug, enalaprilate, were dose related and log enalaprilate correlated significantly with percentage of plasma angiotensin converting enzyme activity (r = -0.66). Enalapril was well tolerated and produced no adverse effects. The drug appears to be superior to placebo and offers considerable promise for the treatment of this condition.     

Evaluation of a long-acting converting enzyme inhibitor (enalapril) for the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure

Converting enzyme inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system has proved a valuable therapeutic approach in patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure. In the present study, a new long-acting converting enzyme inhibitor (enalapril) was evaluated with acute single dose testing (10, 20 or 40 mg) in nine patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure. Four hours after administration, there was a significant reduction of systemic vascular resistance (-19%) and pulmonary wedge pressure (-19%); in addition, there were related increases of cardiac index (+16%) and stroke index (+19%) (probability [p] less than or equal to 0.05 for all changes). This was associated with an increase of plasma renin activity (9 +/- 3 to 35 +/- 11 ng/ml per hour) and a decrease of plasma aldosterone (19 +/- 4 to 9 +/- 2 ng/100 ml) (p less than 0.02 for both). With long-term therapy (1 month), there was improvement of exercise tolerance time and lessening of symptoms based on the New York Heart Association classification. Hemodynamic improvement was maintained in most, but not all, patients. There was no orthostatic hypotension during head-up tilt and hemodynamic values in the upright position were associated with normalization of intracardiac pressures. Long-term converting enzyme inhibition was indicated by a persistent increase of plasma renin activity (16 +/- 2 ng/ml per hour) and a decrease of plasma aldosterone (8 +/- 3 ng/100 ml). In addition, relative angiotensin II receptor occupancy was decreased as judged by the pharmacodynamic response to infusion of the angiotensin II analog saralasin. In conclusion, the long-acting converting enzyme inhibitor, enalapril, was effective in patients with chronic congestive heart failure; however, additional studies will be necessary to further delineate the optimal dose range and identify those patients who are most likely to respond to the drug.     

The Clinical Application of Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Chronic blockade of the renin angiotensin system became possible when orally active inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme, the enzyme which catalyzes the transformation of angiotensin I into angiotensin II, were synthetized. Two compounds, captopril and enalapril, have been investigated in clinical studies. The decrease of the pressor response to exogenous angiotensin I and of the circulating levels of angiotensin II following administration of these inhibitors has been demonstrated to be directly related to the degree of suppression of plasma angiotensin converting enzyme activity. These inhibitors have been shown to normalize blood pressure alone in some hypertensive patients whereas in many others, satisfactory blood pressure control can be achieved only after the addition of a diuretic. Captopril and enalapril also markedly improve cardiac function of patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Chronic blockade of the renin angiotensin system has therefore provided an interesting new approach to the treatment of clinical hypertension and heart failure.     

The antiarrhythmic potential of angiotensin II antagonism: experience with losartan

A large body of literature accumulated over the past several years supports the notion that inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system protects the heart and other target organs from hypertensive complications. Various studies have shown that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce morbidity and mortality in the setting of ischemic heart disease and/or congestive heart failure. The improvement in survival has been attributed in part to a significant decrease in the incidence of sudden deaths, possibly due to a decrease in complex arrhythmia episodes. Recently, the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist losartan was shown to reduce mortality by 46% compared with captopril in older patients with chronic congestive heart failure. This paper briefly reviews the arrhythmogenic properties of angiotensin II and the possible pharmacologic mechanisms for the antiarrhythmogenic potential of losartan.     

Effects of the replacement of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril by the angiotensin II receptor blocker telmisartan in patients with congestive heart failure. The replacement of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition (REPLACE) investigators

AIM: To compare the effects on maximal exercise tolerance of 12 weeks of four dosages of telmisartan (10/20/40/80 mg once daily), an AT(1) specific angiotensin II receptor antagonist, or continuation on the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril, in patients with stable, mild-to-moderate congestive heart failure (NYHA Class II and III and left ventricular ejection fraction < or =40%). DESIGN: Multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group trial in 378 patients, randomized to once-daily treatment with telmisartan 10, 20, 40 mg, 80 mg, or continuation of enalapril 10 mg twice daily for 12 weeks. METHODS: Primary efficacy parameter: change from baseline to final visit in bicycle exercise duration. Secondary efficacy parameters included left ventricular ejection fraction, quality-of-life parameters, arterial blood pressures, neurohormonal changes and NYHA classification. PATIENTS: The mean age of the patients was 64+/-9 years, 89% male, history of myocardial infarction in 68%, NYHA-II: 63%, NYHA-III: 37%, ejection fraction 26.4(7)%, and a reproducible impaired exercise capacity. All patients were on diuretics and enalapril 10 mg twice daily, and 39% were taking digitalis at study entry. RESULTS: No clinically relevant or statistically significant (P<0.05) differences were observed in the primary efficacy parameter: mean changes (s) in exercise tolerance were +8.6, +8.2, +2.2, and +7.1 for the telmisartan 10-, 20-, 40-, and 80-mg groups, respectively, and +1.4 for enalapril. There was a small but significant increase in blood pressure in all but the 80 mg telmisartan groups, compared to enalapril. Telmisartan and enalapril had comparable adverse event profiles. Cough occurred in 5.6% of the enalapril patients and in 3% of the telmisartan patients (NS). CONCLUSIONS: (1) In patients with stable, mild-to-moderate congestive heart failure, enalapril could be replaced by telmisartan for a period of 12 weeks without deterioration in exercise capacity or clinical status. (2) No differences were observed in exercise capacity between the four dosages of telmisartan.     

Differential effects of direct antagonism of AII compared to ACE inhibitors on serum potassium levels and azotemia in patients with severe congestive heart failure

OBJECTIVES. The present study was undertaken to determine if direct blockade of angiotensin II receptors by losartan potassium as compared to ACE inhibition might result in greater tolerability in patients with congestive heart failure in whom ACE inhibition resulted in hyperkalemia and azotemia. BACKGROUND. Blockade of angiotensin II receptors by losartan potassium may produce similar benefits in congestive heart failure as ACE inhibition. However, some observations suggest losartan potassium may have different effects on renal function than ACE inhibition. METHODS. Five consecutive patients with severe congestive heart failure were identified in whom treatment with ACE inhibition was complicated by hyperkalemia (K>5.7) and azotemia. In three of these patients losartan potassium was substituted for ACE inhibition while losartan potassium was added to treatment with ACE inhibition in the remaining two. The mean of four serial values of potassium, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine were compared before and after change in treatment using a two-tailed t test. RESULTS. The addition or substitution of losartan potassium resulted in statistically insignificant reductions in blood urea nitrogen and creatinine and a significant reduction in potassium from 5.7+/-0.1 to 4.9+/-0.3, p<0.03. Two patients who had required kayexalate were withdrawn. In all patients, hyperkalemia resolved and did not reoccur. CONCLUSIONS. There appear to be fundamental differences between the effects of losartan potassium and ACE inhibitors on potassium excretion in congestive heart failure patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency. Losartan potassium may also be associated with less azotemia in such patients. These differences may have important clinical implications, particularly in the subset of patients in whom ACE inhibition is poorly tolerated as a result of hyperkalemia and azotemia. (c)2000 by CHF, Inc.     

Immediate converting-enzyme inhibition with intravenous enalapril in chronic congestive heart failure

To test the hypothesis that intravenous enalapril is a useful pharmacologic probe of the renin angiotensin system, intravenous enalapril was administered to 9 patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF). This produced abrupt and complete blockade of converting enzyme, with peak effect occurring at 30 minutes, as reflected by increases of plasma renin activity (from 16.8 +/- 6 to 86.6 +/- 23 ng/ml/hour) and decreases of plasma aldosterone levels (from 46 +/- 14 to 25 +/- 6 ng%) (both p less than 0.05). With reduction of angiotensin II--mediated vasoconstriction, systemic vascular resistance decreased markedly (from 1,974 +/- 233 to 1,400 +/- 136 dyne s cm-5) and cardiac index was improved (from 1.88 +/- 0.9 to 2.20 +/- 0.21 liters/min/m2) (both p less than 0.05). The time course of angiotensin II levels suggested that the lack of a cumulative effect from additive doses of intravenous enalapril was a reflection of complete inhibition of converting enzyme. One patient did not respond to enalapril; despite comparable hemodynamic severity of CHF, the renin-angiotensin system was not activated in this patient. Thus, intravenous enalapril is capable of rapid and complete inhibition of converting enzyme for the accurate assessment of angiotensin II--mediated vasoconstriction in patients with severe CHF.     

What have we learned about inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system?

With orally active angiotensin converting inhibitors it is now possible to block the renin-angiotensin system chronically. These agents given alone normalize blood pressure of many hypertensive patients. In the remaining, an additional salt subtraction, induced for example by diuretics, is necessary to further reduce blood pressure. In patients with congestive heart failure, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors increase cardiac output and exercise capacity, both acutely and chronically. Adverse reactions resulting from blockade of the renin-angiotensin system can be predicted to a large extent and therefore are most often easily avoided. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors like captopril and enalapril, because of their efficacy and good acceptability are likely to become important drugs for the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure.     

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists in heart failure: Rationale and design of the evaluation of losartan in the elderly (ELITE) trial

Summary Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) have been proven to be effective in reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure or post-myocardial infarction left ventricular dysfunction. Despite evidence from several large-scale randomized trials, the use of ACE-I in patients with heart failure remains relatively low. In part, the failure to achieve more widespread use of ACE-I in patients with heart failure may be due to physician's perceptions of the side effects associated with ACE-I, such as angioedema, renal dysfunction, cough, and hypotension. Many of these side effects are thought to be due to ACE-I-induced bradykinin accumulation. It is possible to inhibit the effect of angiotensin II without increasing bradykinin levels using an angiotensin II type I blocking agent such as losartan. How effective losartan is compared with an ACE-I is uncertain, however. Some of the beneficial effects of ACE-I have been attributed to bradykinin accumulation, and therefore ACE-I might have an advantage compared with an angiotensin II type I receptor antagonist such as losartan. On the other hand, angiotensin II may be produced by non-ACE-I-dependent mechanisms, which would suggest that an angiotensin II type I receptor blocking agent would be advantageous. To determine the relative safety and efficacy of an ACE-I, which results in bradykinin accumulation and inhibitors of angiotensin II, versus an angiotensin II type I receptor blocking agent, which does not result in bradykinin accumulation, we have begun the Evaluation of Losartan In The Elderly (ELITE) trial, which will compare the safety and efficacy of captopril and losartan in elderly patients with heart failure.     

Angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitors and the renal excretion of urate

Summary Hyperuricaemia carries with it a high risk of tophi development affecting connective tissue in kidney, skin and joints, its overt clinical expression being gout. Diuretics, which are invariably prescribed in congestive heart failure and widely used for the treatment of essential hypertension, may cause hyperuricaemia and predispose to gout by inducing renal retention of urate.The angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitors captopril and enalapril have been found to augment renal urate excretion both in normal volunteers and in hypertensive patients. Current evidence appears to indicate that the uricosuric effect of captopril and enalapril could be due to the rises in renin and angiotensin I these drugs elicit by angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibition, and/or to pharmacological actions not related, at least directly, to the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Serum urate levels have been significantly reduced by monotherapy with captopril in hypertensive patients suffering from hyperuricaemia. Diuretic-induced hyperuricaemia in hypertensive patients can be prevented or counteracted by the administration of captopril and enalapril.Available clinical data support the argument that captopril and enalapril should be used as first choice drugs for the treatment of hyperuricaemic hypertensive patients. When diuretic-induced hyperuricaemia develops in patients suffering from congestive heart failure, captopril or enalapril should be added to the therapeutic regime in doses capable of countering the shift in plasma urate concentration, provided the clinical condition of the patients permits such additional pharmacological treatment.Therapy with captopril and enalapril should preferably be instituted in a gradual manner, especially in patients with hyperuricaemia, in order to prevent the precipitation of urate in the kidney and in the urinary tract.     

Estimation of angiotensin II receptor activity in chronic congestive heart failure

The renin-angiotensin system has been shown to participate in the pathophysiology of chronic heart failure in many patients. However, the immediate assessment of this contribution in individual patients may sometimes be difficult. As a pharmacologic estimate of angiotensin II receptor activity, we infused the angiotensin II analogue, saralasin, in 20 patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure (CHF). The infusion resulted in blood pressure responses ranging from an agonist pressor response (increased systemic resistance) in patients with low intrinsic renin-angiotensin system activity, to an antagonist depressor response (decreased systemic resistance) in patients with marked activation of the renin-angiotensin system. The ability of the saralasin response to pharmacologically estimate angiotensin II receptor activity in CHF was further revealed by two physiologic maneuvers that decrease endogenous circulating angiotensin II and angiotensin II receptor occupancy. Both converting enzyme inhibition with captopril and sodium repletion, factors known to decrease endogenous angiotensin II activity, provoked agonist responses to saralasin infusion. Furthermore, saralasin was able to reverse the orthostatic hypotension precipitated by converting enzyme inhibition of angiotensin-dependent vascular tone. In summary, saralasin provided a means to estimate angiotensin receptor activity and may therefore serve as a probe of angiotensin-mediated vasoconstriction in the pathophysiology of chronic CHF.     

Effects of long-term enalapril and losartan therapy of heart failure on cardiovascular aldosterone

Plasma aldosterone escape is found during long-term ACE inhibitor therapy of chronic heart failure. Evidence for aldosterone production in cardiovascular tissues raised the question of whether aldosterone escape occurs or not in these tissues. Rats with infarction-induced chronic heart failure were treated with enalapril (20 mg/kg/d) and losartan (15 mg/kg/d) for 20 weeks. Untreated chronic heart failure and sham-operated rats were used as positive and normal controls, respectively. Ex vivo mesenteric artery and heart perfusion, high performance liquid chromatography, and RIA for aldosterone were performed. Chronic heart failure due to myocardial infarction was associated with tissue-specific activation of cardiovascular aldosterone synthesis. In the mesenteric artery, enalapril significantly inhibited aldosterone production compared to untreated, chronic heart failure rats, and losartan lowered aldosterone production to that of sham rats. In myocardium, enalapril failed to significantly inhibit aldosterone production, and losartan significantly inhibited aldosterone production compared to untreated, chronic heart failure rats. These results provide the first evidence that long-term ACE inhibition therapy induces aldosterone escape in myocardium but not in mesenteric artery of chronic heart failure. The angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor blocker losartan tranquilized aldosterone levels in the cardiovascular tissues of chronic heart failure rats.     

Sustained beneficial effects of enalapril in Africans with congestive heart failure

A single blind, placebo controlled, dose-ranging 3 month study of the effects of enalapril on cardiovascular parameters, clinical status and self-paced exercise capacity was undertaken in 12 Nigerians with chronic heart failure. Enalapril exerted only a modest reduction in blood pressure and heart rate but significantly improved functional capacity (P less than 0.01), and prolonged self-paced exercise time (P less than 0.05) compared to the placebo baseline. The pressure rate product and the double product corrected for exercise time, an index of myocardial oxygen demand, exhibited a significant and sustained reduction on enalapril treatment (P less than 0.01). Concentration of sodium in the serum was significantly increased (P less than 0.05) but concentrations of potassium and creatinine were unaltered. These results demonstrate the sustained efficacy of enalapril in black Africans with heart failure and indicate no important racial difference in the response to inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme in congestive heart failure.     

Improving the managed care of hypertension with angiotensin II antagonists

Among the modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease, hypertension is the most powerful and treatable. For an asymptomatic patient to remain on a lifetime of antihypertensive treatment that might cause adverse effects is difficult for most patients. Managed care plans should treat hypertensive patients in ways that the patient can remain on therapy to prevent complications and thereby reduce the long-term costs associated with untreated hypertension. The recent disappointing outcomes achieved with antihypertensive drugs suggest there is room for improvement in the management of hypertension. Since the introduction of the first orally active angiotensin II receptor blocking drug, losartan, attention has been focused on the central role of angiotensin II in hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Studies of angiotensin II antagonists (AIIAs), which block the tissue receptor for angiotensin II, show that these agents effectively control hypertension when given once daily and cause no significant adverse effects or laboratory abnormalities. Losartan is unique among the AIIAs in that it offers 1-step titration dosing and has a uricosuric effect. Losartan, candesartan, and valsartan have been shown to improve the symptoms of congestive heart failure; losartan has been similar to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in reducing systolic dysfunction congestive heart failure mortality. At 1 year, the refill rate for losartan in a managed care setting has been more than that for any other class of antihypertensive agents. Although there is not yet a clinical trial determining the long term mortality of AIIA treatment in hypertension compared with other antihypertensive agents, the use of AIIAs in conjunction with lifestyle modification and patient education can provide more efficient hypertension control and a provide a treatment with which patients can live.