Emergency department at the cutting edge.

OBJECTIVE: This paper reviews the experience of penetrating chest trauma over a 3-year period in one UK emergency department. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients assessed in the emergency department resuscitation room between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2005. Patients with penetrating chest trauma, either isolated or in combination with other injuries, were included. A Medline search was performed using the terms 'chest', 'trauma' and 'penetrating'. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients presented with penetrating chest trauma. Ninety-two percent were male. Ninety-six percent (115) of the patients survived to hospital discharge. Seventy-eight percent of the patients presented at night (20.00 and 8.00 h). A single wound accounted for 52% (63) of patients, multiple wounds 43% (52) with 2% (two) gun-shot wounds and 3% (three) impalings. The mean prehospital time of patients in cardiac arrest was 42 min with a mean on-scene time of 24 min. The mean prehospital time for patients undergoing formal emergency surgery was 39 min with a mean on-scene time of 16 min. Twenty-three patients required one or more tube thoracostomies to be performed in the emergency department and six underwent emergency department thoracotomy. Sixteen patients required immediate formal emergency surgery for haemorrhage control. CONCLUSION: Penetrating chest trauma contributes significantly to our trauma workload with a high proportion of patients sustaining life-threatening injuries requiring immediate intervention. Significant prehospital delays occur. Overall mortality of 4.2% is comparable with that of a major American case series. Further education and protocol development is required to ensure that prehospital and emergency department management of these patients reflects the latest evidence-based guidelines.     

Simple thoracostomy in prehospital trauma management is safe and effective: a 2-year experience by helicopter emergency medical crews.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and potential complications of simple thoracostomy, as first described by Deakin, as a method for prehospital treatment of traumatic pneumothorax. METHODS: Prospective observational study of all severe trauma patients rescued by our Regional Helicopter Emergency Medical Service and treated with on-scene simple thoracostomy, over a period of 25 months, from June 1, 2002 to June 30, 2004. RESULTS: Fifty-five consecutive severely injured patients with suspected pneumothorax and an average Revised Trauma Score of 9.6+/-2.7 underwent field simple thoracostomy. Oxygen saturation significantly improved after the procedure (from 86.4+/-10.2% to 98.5%+/-4.7%, P<0.05). No difference exists in the severity of thoracic lesions between patients with systolic arterial pressure and oxygen saturation below and above or equal to 90. A pneumothorax or a haemopneumothorax was found in 91.5% of the cases and a haemothorax in 5.1%. No cases of major bleeding, lung laceration or pleural infection were recorded. No cases of recurrent tension pneumothorax were observed. Forty (72.7%) patients survived to hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital treatment of traumatic pneumothorax by simple thoracostomy without chest tube insertion is a safe and effective technique.     

Prehospital use of aspirin rarely is associated with adverse events

INTRODUCTION: Aspirin is commonly administered for acute coronary syndromes in the prehospital setting. Few studies have addressed the incidence of adverse effects associated with prehospital administration of aspirin. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of adverse events following the administration of aspirin by prehospital personnel. METHODS: Multi-center, retrospective, case series that involved all patients who received aspirin in the prehospital setting from (01 August 1999-31 January 2000). Patient encounter forms of the emergency medical services (EMS) of a metropolitan fire department were reviewed. All patients who had a potential cardiac syndrome (i.e., chest pain, dyspnea) as documented on the EMS forms were included in the review. Exclusion criteria included failure to meet inclusion criteria, and chest pain secondary to apparent non-cardiac causes (i.e., trauma). Hospital charts were reviewed from a subset of patients at the participating hospitals. The major outcome was an adverse event following prehospital administration of aspirin. This outcome was evaluated during the EMS encounter, at emergency department discharge, or at six and 24-hours post-aspirin ingestion. An adverse event secondary to aspirin ingestion was defined as anaphylaxis or allergic reactions, such as rash or respiratory changes. RESULTS: A total of 25,600 EMS encounter forms were reviewed, yielding 2,399 patients with a potential cardiac syndrome. Prior to EMS arrival, 585 patients had received aspirin, and 893 were administered aspirin by EMS personnel. No patients had an adverse event during the EMS encounter. Of these patients, 229 were transported to participating hospitals and 219 medical records were available for review with no adverse reactions recorded during their hospital course. CONCLUSION: Aspirin is rarely associated with adverse events when administered by prehospital personnel for presumed coronary syndromes.     

T HE E FFECTS OF P REHOSPITAL A DVANCED L IFE S UPPORT D RUG T REATMENT ON P ATIENT I MPROVEMENT AND I N-HOSPITAL U TILIZATION

Objective. There is little published evidence to support the benefits of prehospital drug administration by ambulance personnel in reducing subsequent hospital utilization by the medical patients receiving such drugs. The authors studied the outcome of patients treated by Ontario's Emergency Health Services “Symptom Relief Drug Program,” which was developed to relieve patient symptoms in the field for specific medical emergencies. Methods. A retrospective study spanning a three-year period from January 1996 to December 1998 was undertaken in a mid-sized southern Ontario community. From a review of ambulance call reports (ACRs), eligible patients were recruited by mail and divided into two groups: those treated before the introduction of the program (pre) and those treated after (post). Out-of-hospital data were retrieved from ACRs and in-hospital data were gathered from medical chart reviews. Outcomes included emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS), frequency of admissions, and departmental use. Secondary endpoints included differences in prehospital improvement, ED interventions, and ambulance scene times. Results. For the unpaired analysis, 406 patients provided consent (pre: 215 vs post: 191). Ambulance time on scene was longer in the post group, 14.2 minutes (95% CI 13.7–14.8), versus the pre group, 12.3 minutes (95% CI 11.7–12.9), p < 0.001. A larger proportion of patients receiving prehospital drug treatment were judged to have improved on ED arrival (pre: 19.5% vs post: 48.2%, χ² p < 0.0001). The ED LOSs did not differ between groups (pre: 206.9?min, 95% CI 185.9–230.4, vs post: 220.9?min, 95% CI 196.9–247.7, p = 0.42) but were shorter within the post group for hypoglycemic patients receiving glucagon. The overall proportion of admissions was significantly lower in the post group (pre: 145 [67.4%] vs post: 102 [54.3%], χ² p < 0.01), and this was driven by chest pain patients. Conclusions. The lower rate of admissions for chest pain patients is the first published evidence of prehospital drug treatment's reducing hospital utilization in a subgroup of such medical patients. The “Symptom Relief Drug Program” is effective in improving patients' field conditions and can decrease ED LOS in hypoglycemic persons receiving glucagon injections. More outcome research pertaining to ambulance-administered prehospital drug treatment is warranted.     

Cost-effectiveness and benefit of alternatives to improve training for prehospital trauma care in Mexico

INTRODUCTION: In Latin America, there is a preponderance of prehospital trauma deaths. However, scarce resources mandate that any improvements in prehospital medical care must be cost-effective. This study sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of several approaches to improving training for personnel in three ambulance services in Mexico. METHODS: In Monterrey, training was augmented with PreHospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS) at a cost of [US] dollar 150 per medic trained. In San Pedro, training was augmented with Basic Trauma Life Support (BTLS), Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS), and a locally designed airway management course, at a cost of dollar 400 per medic. Process and outcome of trauma care were assessed before and after the training of these medics and at a control site. RESULTS: The training was effective for both intervention services, with increases in basic airway maneuvers for patients in respiratory distress in Monterrey (16% before versus 39% after) and San Pedro (14% versus 64%). The role of endotrachal intubation for patients with respiratory distress increased only in San Pedro (5% versus 46%), in which the most intensive Advanced Life Support (ALS) training had been provided. However, mortality decreased only in Monterrey, where it had been the highest (8.2% before versus 4.7% after) and where the simplest and lowest cost interventions were implemented. There was no change in process or outcome in the control site. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of assuring uniform, basic training for all prehospital providers. This is a more cost-effective approach than is higher-cost ALS training for improving prehospital trauma care in environments such as Latin America.     

Patients Immobilized with a Long Spine Board Rarely Have Unstable Thoracolumbar Injuries

Most Emergency Medical Services (EMS) protocols require spine immobilization with both a cervical collar and long spine board for patients with suspected spine injuries. The goal of this research was to determine the prevalence of unstable thoracolumbar spine injuries among patients receiving prehospital spine immobilization: a 4-year retrospective review of adult subjects who received prehospital spine immobilization and were transported to a trauma center. Prehospital and hospital records were linked. Data was reviewed to determine if spine imaging was ordered, whether acute thoracolumbar fractures, dislocations, or subluxations were present. Thoracolumbar injuries were classified as unstable if operative repair was performed. Prehospital spine immobilization was documented on 5,593 unique adult subjects transported to the study hospital. A total of 5,423 (97.0%) prehospital records were successfully linked to hospital records. The subjects were 60.2% male, with a mean age of 40.6 (SD = 17.5) years old. An total of 5,286 (97.4%) subjects had sustained blunt trauma. Hospital providers ordered imaging to rule out spine injury in 2,782 (51.3%) cases. An acute thoracolumbar fracture, dislocation, or subluxation was present in 233 (4.3%) cases. An unstable injury was present in 29 (0.5%) cases. No unstable injuries were found among the 951 subjects who were immobilized following ground level falls. Hospital providers ordered at least one spine x-ray or CT in most patients, and a thoracolumbar imaging in half of all patients immobilized. Only 0.5% of patients who received prehospital spine immobilization had an unstable thoracolumbar spine injury.     

Follow-up chest radiographs after traumatic pneumothorax or hemothorax in the outpatient setting: a retrospective review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the need for obtaining postdischarge chest radiographs for trauma patients who were treated with a thoracostomy tube. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review was conducted for all patients treated with a thoracostomy tube while admitted to the trauma service at Saint Louis University Hospital over a 12-month period. Patients who died during their hospital stay were excluded. RESULTS: During the 12-month study period, 155 trauma patients who were treated with a thoracostomy tube were discharged from the hospital. The indications for the thoracostomy tube were pneumothorax (n = 79, 51% of study population), hemopneumothorax (n = 34, 22%), hemothorax (n = 28, 18%), diaphragmatic rupture/laceration (n = 8, 5%), post thoracotomy (n = 4, 3%), and iatrogenic pneumothorax (n = 2, 1%). A follow-up clinic visit was scheduled for 1 to 2 weeks after discharge. Forty patients (26%) were lost to follow-up. Two patients called to report they had no symptoms and canceled their appointments. A total of 113 patients returned for follow-up appointments. Fifty-two patients had a predischarge chest radiograph that was negative for pneumothorax or hemothorax, had no symptoms, had normal results of a physical examination at the time of their clinic visit, and did not have a postdischarge chest radiograph. A total of 61 (54%) had postdischarge chest radiographs. Of that number, 56 (92%) were negative for pneumothorax. Three patients (5%) had a small pneumothorax, and 2 patients (3%) were noted to have a resolving hemothorax. All 5 patients were without symptoms and were released from the trauma service. CONCLUSION: A postdischarge chest radiograph is not indicated for an asymptomatic trauma patient who was treated with a tube thoracostomy and had a predischarge chest radiograph that was negative for pneumothorax or hemothorax.     

Isolated prehospital hypotension after traumatic injuries: a predictor of mortality?

In patients with traumatic injuries, prehospital hypotension that resolves by Emergency Department (ED) arrival is of uncertain significance. We examined the impact of prehospital hypotension (PH) in normotensive ED patients with traumatic injuries on predicting mortality and chest/abdominal operative intervention. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of consecutive patients undergoing helicopter transport to two trauma centers between 1993 and 1997. Outcomes were mortality and chest or abdominal operative intervention. Of 545 scene transports, 55 (10.1%) patients were hypotensive on ED arrival, leaving 490 normotensive ED patients. Of 490 patients, 35 (7%) had PH and 455 (93%) had no PH. Multiple logistic regression showed the PH group to have a relative risk for death of 4.4 (95% CI: 1.2-16.6, p < 0.03) and for chest or abdominal operative intervention of 2.9 (1.1-7.6, p < 0.03). In this study of normotensive trauma center patients, prehospital hypotension was associated with increased risk of mortality and significant chest or abdominal injury.     

Time Is Brain: Prehospital Emergency Medical Services Response Times for Suspected Stroke and Effects of Prehospital Interventions

ObjectivesTo compare prehospital time for patients with suspected stroke in Florida with the American Stroke Association (ASA) time benchmarks, and to investigate the effects of dispatch notification and stroke assessment scales on prehospital time.Patients and MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed using data from Florida’s Emergency Medical Services Tracking and Reporting System database. All patients with suspected stroke transported to a treatment center from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018, were analyzed. Time intervals from 911 call to hospital arrival were evaluated and compared with ASA benchmarks.ResultsIn 2018, 11,577 patients with suspected stroke were transported to a hospital (mean age, 71.5±15.7 years; 51.5% women). The median alarm-to-hospital time was 33.98 minutes (27.8 to 41.4), with a total emergency medical services (EMS) time of 32.30 minutes (26.5 to 39.478). The on-scene time was the largest time interval with a median of 13.28 minutes (10.0 to 17.4). Emergency medical services encounters met the ASA benchmarks for time in 58% to 62% of the EMS encounters in Florida (recommended 90%; P<.001). The total EMS time was reduced when a stroke notification was reported by the dispatch center (32.00 minutes vs 32.62 minutes; P=.006) or when a stroke assessment scale was used by the EMS personnel (31.88 minutes vs 32.96 minutes; P=.005).ConclusionThis study reveals a substantial opportunity for improvement in stroke care in Florida. Two prehospital EMS stroke interventions seem to reduce prehospital time for patients with suspected stroke. Adoption of these interventions might improve the stroke systems of care.     

Esophageal tracheal Combitube® in the emergency department

The Combitube is currently being used in some prehospital cardiac arrest situations and in flight programs for management of airways in trauma patients, as well as in inpatient departments with limited availability to personnel experienced in intubation. The Combitube allows for quick intubation and for continuing airway access while the patient is in the emergency department.     

Information Loss in Emergency Medical Services Handover of Trauma Patients

Introduction. Little is known about how effectively information is transferred from emergency medical services (EMS) personnel to clinicians in the emergency department receiving the patient. Information about prehospital events and findings can help ensure expedient and appropriate care. The trauma literature describes 16 prehospital data points that affect outcome and therefore should be included in the EMS report when applicable. Objective. To determine the degree to which information presented in the EMS trauma patient handover is degraded. Methods. At a level I trauma center, patients meeting criteria for the highest level of trauma team activation (“full trauma”) were enrolled. As part of routine performance improvement, the physician leadership of the trauma program watched all available video-recorded full trauma responses, checking off whether the data points appropriate to the case were verbally “transmitted” by the EMS provider. Two EMS physicians then each independently reviewed the trauma team's chart notes for 50% of the sample (and a randomly selected 15% of the charts to assess agreement) and checked off whether the same elements were documented (“received”) by the trauma team. The focus was on data elements that were “transmitted” but not “received.” Results. In 96 patient handovers, a total of 473 elements were transmitted, of which 329 were received (69.6%). On the average chart, 72.9% of the transmitted items were received (95% confidence interval 69.0%–76.8%). The most commonly transmitted data elements were mechanism of injury (94 times), anatomic location of injury (81), and age (67). Prehospital hypotension was received in only 10 of the 28 times it was transmitted; prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 10 of 22 times; and pulse rate 13 of 49 times. Conclusions. Even in the controlled setting of a single-patient handover with direct verbal contact between EMS providers and in-hospital clinicians, only 72.9% of the key prehospital data points that were transmitted by the EMS personnel were documented by the receiving hospital staff. Elements such as prehospital hypotension, GCS score, and other prehospital vital signs were often not recorded. Methods of “transmitting” and “receiving” data in trauma as well as all other patients need further scrutiny.     

Early identification of acute myocardial infarction and prognosis in relation to mode of transport to hospital.

Of 2,840 consecutive patients who were admitted to the emergency department of a Swedish university hospital due to suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI), only 25% were reached by the mobile coronary care unit (MCCU), and only 4% simultaneously fulfilled traditional criteria for prehospital thrombolysis (ie, had ST-segment elevation on admission electrocardiogram and a delay time of less than 6 hours). In the subset of patients who fulfilled criteria for a confirmed AMI, 31% were reached by an MCCU and 11% fulfilled criteria for prehospital thrombolysis. Among patients with confirmed AMI, the hospital mortality rate was highest in patients transported by standard ambulance (19%) versus 15% in those transported by an MCCU and 8% in those transported by other means. The authors conclude that AMI patients transported by ambulance are high-risk patients for early death. Prehospital thrombolysis might reduce their rate of mortality. However, according to the authors' experience only a minor fraction of patients are available for prehospital thrombolysis.     

Prehospital ketamine administration to pediatric trauma patients with head injuries in combat theaters

BackgroundHead injuries frequently occur in combat. Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) guidelines recommend pre-hospital use of ketamine for analgesia. Yet the use of this medication in patients with head injuries remains controversial, particularly among pediatric patients. We compare survival to hospital discharge rates among pediatric head injury subjects who received prehospital ketamine versus those who did not.MethodsWe queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all pediatric (<18 years of age) subjects from January 2007 to January 2016. We performed a sub-analysis of subjects with an abbreviated injury severity score for the head of 3 (serious) or higher and at least one documented Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≤13.ResultsOf the 3439 pediatric patients within our dataset, 555 subjects met inclusion criteria for head injury – 36 (6.5%) received prehospital ketamine versus 519 (93.5%) who did not. There was no significant difference noted between groups regarding median age (10 versus 8, p = 0.259), percent male gender (72.2% versus 76.3%, p = 0.579), mechanism of injury (p = 0.143), median composite injury scores (22 versus 20, p = 0.082), median ventilator-free days (28 versus 27, p = 0.068), median ICU-free days (27.5 versus 27, p = 0.767), median hospital days (3.5 versus 4, p = 0.876) or survival to discharge (66.7% versus 70.7%, p = 0.607).ConclusionsWithin this data set, we were unable to detect any differences in mortality among pediatric head trauma subjects administered ketamine compared to subjects not receiving this medication in the prehospital setting.     

Comparison of ventilation performance: standard resuscitation bag and the resuscitation bag controller

Clinical evaluation of ventilation performance during resuscitation is largely subjective. A mechanical device, the resuscitation bag controller (RC), which encircles the bag and allows controlled compression may improve the precision and accuracy of ventilation with manual resuscitation bags (MRB). We hypothesize that more precise, controlled pressure ventilation can be delivered with the RC, compared to the MRB. Prehospital (N = 13) and hospital personnel (N = 12) who routinely perform manual ventilation were randomized to either method of ventilation. Operators were instructed to ventilate an intubated adult mannequin. The percent of breaths delivered within a specified range, 800 to 1200 mL, was compared using simple regression analysis. The precision of tidal volume (TV) and peak airway pressure (PAP) was compared between methods and groups using the coefficient of variation. Comparison for significant differences between methods and groups in the number of breaths with a TV less than 800 mL and those with pressures greater than 30 cm H20 was performed using chi square or Fisher's exact test. There were no significant differences in the percent of acceptable breaths or mean TV delivered between methods or groups. The precision (i.e., reproducibility of the same value) of TV for both methods was best for hospital personnel. PAPS were less than or equal to 30 cm H2O for 93% of all breaths. Hospital personnel delivered a significantly greater percent of inadequate (less than 0.8 L) breaths, 19 versus 7.4%, and excessive pressure breaths, 9.2 versus 4.2%, when compared to prehospital personnel. We conclude that the resuscitation bag controller offers little advantage over standard bag resuscitation for adult resuscitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Efficacy of intranasal naloxone as a needleless alternative for treatment of opioid overdose in the prehospital setting

Prehospital providers are at increased risk for blood-borne exposure and disease due to the nature of their environment. The use if intranasal (i.n.) medications in high-risk populations may limit this risk of exposure. To determine the efficacy of i.n. naloxone in the treatment of suspected opiate overdose patients in the prehospital setting, a prospective, nonrandomized trial of administering i.n. naloxone by paramedics to patients with suspected opiate overdoses over a 6-month period was performed. All adult patients encountered in the prehospital setting as suspected opiate overdose (OD), found down (FD), or with altered mental status (AMS) who met the criteria for naloxone administration were included in the study. i.n. naloxone (2 mg) was administered immediately upon patient contact and before i.v. insertion and administration of i.v. naloxone (2 mg). Patients were then treated by EMS protocol. The main outcome measures were: time of i.n. naloxone administration, time of i.v. naloxone administration, time of appropriate patient response as reported by paramedics. Ninety-five patients received i.n. naloxone and were included in the study. A total of 52 patients responded to naloxone by either i.n. or i.v., with 43 (83%) responding to i.n. naloxone alone. Seven patients (16%) in this group required further doses of i.v. naloxone. In conclusion, i.n. naloxone is a novel alternative method for drug administration in high-risk patients in the prehospital setting with good overall effectiveness. The use of this route is further discussed in relation to efficacy of treatment and minimizing the risk of blood-borne exposures to EMS personnel.     

ECG signs of acute myocardial ischemia in the prehospital setting of a suspected acute coronary syndrome and its association with outcomes

Aims

The aims of this study were (a) to determine the prehospital prevalence of electrocardiographic (ECG) signs of acute myocardial ischemia in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome and (b) to describe the relationships between the various ECG patterns and the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and outcomes.

Methods

Prospective cohort study using data from an interventional trial in acute chest pain patients transported by the emergency medical services. These patients were classified into 3 groups: patients with ECG showing signs of acute myocardial ischemia, patients with ECG showing other abnormal changes (bundle-branch block, pacemaker rhythm, Q-wave or T-wave inversion) and patients without significant pathologic findings. All P values are age-adjusted.

Results

Among 1546 patients, 312 (20%) had ECG signs of acute myocardial ischemia. Of them, 57% had a final diagnosis of AMI versus 26% of those with other abnormal ECGs and 12% of those with ECG without significant pathologic findings (P < .0001). In all, 53% of all AMI cases involved patients without ECG signs of acute myocardial ischemia. Although ECG signs of acute myocardial ischemia predicted heart failure and ventricular tachyarrhythmias both prior to and after hospital admission, there was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the 3 patient groups (4.3%, 3.7%, and 1.2%, respectively, P = .11).

Conclusion

Among patients with a clinical suspicion of AMI in the prehospital setting, the prevalence of ECG signs suggesting AMI was low, as was the ability to identify AMI patients using ECG findings only. We therefore need better instruments in the prehospital triage of patients with acute chest pain.     

Sonographic septation: a useful prognostic indicator of acute thoracic empyema.

The aim of this study was to identify sonographic predictors of patient outcomes or need for surgical intervention of acute thoracic empyema. All patients with a clinical diagnosis of thoracic empyema underwent transthoracic ultrasonographic examination and thoracentesis at admission. According to the presence or absence of septa in sonographic images, the patients were classified into two groups: septated and nonseptated. Sonographic findings were analyzed with respect to duration of hospital stay, chest tube drainage, and treatment efficacy. A total of 163 consecutive patients were included in the study (83 patients with septated and 80 with nonseptated sonographic images). The mean duration of hospital stay (35.4 versus 27.0 days, P = 0.009) and chest tube drainage (13.1 versus 7.6 days, P < 0.001) for the patients with septa were significantly longer than for those without septa. The patients with septa were more likely to undergo intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (63.8% versus 38.8%, odds ratio 2.79, P = 0.001) and surgical intervention (24.3% versus 7.5%, odds ratio 3.92, P = 0.004). We concluded that sonographic septation is a useful sign to predict the need for subsequent intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy and surgical intervention in cases of acute thoracic empyema. Early fibrinolytic therapy or even surgical intervention may be indicated in patients with sonographic septations.     

Accuracy of EMS-Recorded Patient Demographic Data

Objective. Emergency medical services (EMS) research is frequently dependent on data recorded by prehospital personnel. Linking EMS information with hospital outcome depends on essential identifying data. We sought to determine the accuracy of these data in patients who activated EMS for chest pain andto describe the types of errors committed. Methods. We performed a retrospective, consecutive case series study of all prehospital records for patients transported by the City of Pittsburgh Bureau of EMS (annual call volume, 60,000) for chest pain to three area hospitals during a three-month interval. Demographic data, including name, date of birth (DOB), andSocial Security number (SSN), for each patient were extracted from the EMS record. These were compared to the definitive information in the hospital records. Results. 360 prehospital records were examined, with 341 matches to hospital records. The correct patient name was recorded in 301 records (83.6%), the correct DOB was recorded 284 times (78.9%), andthe correct SSN was recorded 120 times (33.3%). The overall error rate of demographic data recorded on EMS records was 73.9% (266/360). If SSN is not included as a demographic variable, then the overall error rate was 25.3% (91/360). Conclusion. The use of EMS-generated demographic data demonstrates moderate agreement andlinkage with hospital records. Name andDOB are more reliable data elements for matching than SSN. Future research should examine the impact of electronic medical records andEMS identification numbers on data reliability.