St. John's wort extract Ze 117 (Hypericum perforatum) inhibits norepinephrine and serotonin uptake into rat brain slices and reduces 3-adrenoceptor numbers on cultured rat brain cells

Despite almost forty years of widespread use, the mode of action of antidepressant drugs is still largely unknown. There is agreement that these drugs interact with central neurotransmission. Common findings are acute inhibitory actions on reuptake mechanisms for norepinephrine (NE) and for serotonin (5-HT) at presynaptic axons and chronic adaptive effects on neurotransmitter receptors on postsynaptic membranes. In particular, beta-adrenoceptor downregulation has been observed after chronic treatment with most antidepressants in vivo and in cell culture systems. We studied the effectiveness of Ze 117 (St. John's wort) extract (Hypericum perforatum) on NE- and 5-HT-uptake into rat brain slices. Potency and efficacy of the Ze 117 extract were compared with those of tricyclic (TCA) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-type antidepressants. A dose-dependent inhibition was seen on NE and 5-HT uptake into brain slices. The Ze 117 extract was more selective for the uptake of NE than for that of 5-HT. The maximal extent of uptake inhibition by Ze 117 extract was comparable to that of imipramine (IMI), desipramine (DMI) or fluvoxamine for 5-HT, but lower for NE transport, than that of the synthetic antidepressants. Chronic exposure (8 days) of confluent C6-cell cultures to Ze 117 extract resulted in a dose-dependent beta-adrenoceptor downregulation equal to that induced by DMI, a potent TCA. None of these effects could be achieved with either hypericin or hyperforin alone in a relevant dose range. Our results indicate that the St. John's wort extract Ze 117 contains active, but as yet unknown antidepressant principles with effects comparable to those of TCAs.     

Fluoxetine reduces L-DOPA-derived extracellular DA in the 6-OHDA-lesioned rat striatum

We investigated the effect of fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), on L-DOPA-derived extracellular dopamine (DA) levels in the striatum of rats with nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation using in vivo microdialysis. Treatment with fluoxetine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) induced a 41% reduction in the cumulative amount of extracellular DA during 300 min following L-DOPA administration (50 mg/kg, i.p.; p < 0.01). This effect was antagonized by pretreatment with WAY-100635, a potent 5-HT1A antagonist, indicating that this effect of fluoxetine is due to its indirect 5-HT1A agonistic property. These results suggest that SSRIs may impair motor functions in patients with Parkinson's disease by reducing efflux of exogenous L-DOPA-derived DA.     

5-HT6 receptor antagonist SB-271046 enhances extracellular levels of monoamines in the rat medial prefrontal cortex

The present study investigated the neurochemical effects of the selective 5-HT(6) receptor antagonist SB-271046 in the rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). The effect of SB-271046 on extracellular levels of dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE), and serotonin (5-HT) in the mPFC was examined using in vivo microdialysis in the freely moving rat. SB-271046 (10 mg/kg, p.o.) produced a significant increase in extracellular levels of both DA and NE without altering 5-HT neurotransmission. These results further support the rationale for the use of 5-HT(6) receptor antagonists in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction associated with psychiatric diseases.     

Pharmacokinetics of SSRI antidepressants: half-life and clinical applicability

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) antidepressants are at present time the most useful for the treatment of depression. SSRIs exhibit differences in potency of inhibiting serotonin reuptake, although the differences do not correlate with clinical efficacy. There are substantial pharmacokinetic differences among the five SSRIs, fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline and citalopram. Optimum use of these drugs requires a working knowledge of these differences. Among these pharmacokinetic parameters, half-life and metabolism pathways are the most relevant. There are substantial differences in term of their half-life between fluoxetine and others SSRIs. The half-life of fluoxetine and its active metabolite norfluoxetine is respectively 2 to 4 days and 7 to 15 days, more extended than other SSRIs (approximately 1 day). The extended half-life of fluoxetine and its active metabolite may be an advantage in the poorly compliant patient and may offer a potential safety advantage over shorter-acting SSRIs, with respect to abrupt discontinuation of therapy. Conversely, this long half-life needs a long period of wash-out (5 weeks) before introducing other drugs (MAOIs, sumatriptan) which can interact with serotonin function and can lead to the serotoninergic syndrome. SSRIs are potent inhibitors of the hepatic isoenzyme P450-2D6 and would be expected to have effects on the clearance of drugs metabolized by this enzyme. Paroxetine is the most potent inhibitor, followed by fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram and fluvoxamine. The metabolite elimination of citalopram, paroxetine and fluvoxamine is delayed by renal disease and dosages should be lowered in elderly patients. Conversely the pharmacokinetic of fluoxetine and sertraline are not affected by either age or renal impairment and, for fluoxetine, by obesity.     

Desensitization of 5-HT2A receptor function by chronic administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

We have previously shown that chronic treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), fluvoxamine and paroxetine, attenuated m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP)-induced hypolocomotion in rats. The effect of these SSRIs on the response to mCPP is thought to be caused by the desensitization of 5-HT2C receptor function. In the present study, we investigated whether chronic administration of SSRI could reduce another pharmacological response to mCPP in rats, i.e., the induction of the secretion of corticosterone. The mCPP-induced increase in the serum concentration of corticosterone was not blocked by the 5-HT2C antagonist SB242084, but was blocked by the 5-HT2A antagonist ketanserin. Chronic treatment with fluvoxamine and paroxetine attenuated the response to mCPP, while these SSRIs had no effects in control rats. These results suggest that the desensitization of 5-HT2A receptor function occurs in the same way as that of 5-HT2C receptor function through chronic treatment with either fluvoxamine or paroxetine as a consequence of prolonged exposure to elevated levels of serotonin. The hypersensitivity of 5-HT2A receptors is observed in depressed patients, and chronic treatment with many antidepressants such as tricyclic antidepressants have been reported to reduce 5-HT2A receptor density and/or efficacy. The desensitization of 5-HT2A receptor function might contribute to the therapeutic mechanism of action of these SSRIs, as seen with other classes of antidepressants.     

Modafinil enhances the increase of extracellular serotonin levels induced by the antidepressant drugs fluoxetine and imipramine: a dual probe microdialysis study in awake rat

In view of a postulated role of the vigilance-promoting drug modafinil in depression, the interaction of modafinil and two classical antidepressant drugs, fluoxetine and imipramine, were studied in 5-HT levels in the dorsal raphe-cortical system using dual-probe microdialysis. Fluoxetine (1-10 mg/kg) dose-dependently increased dorsal raphe-cortical 5-HT levels. Modafinil at a very low dose (3 mg/kg), by itself ineffective, enhanced the fluoxetine (5 mg/kg)-induced increases of 5-HT levels in both brain areas. A synergistic interaction was observed in the prefrontal cortex with fluoxetine (1 mg/kg) in terms of 5-HT release, but not in the dorsal raphe. Imipramine (1.3 mg/kg) increased 5-HT levels in the dorsal raphe, but not in the prefrontal cortex, while the higher doses (10.9-21.8 mg/kg) caused substantial increases in both brain areas. Modafinil (3 mg/kg), injected before imipramine (1.3 mg/kg), which by itself was ineffective on cortical 5-HT levels, increased cortical 5-HT levels. On other hand, modafinil failed to affect the high-dose imipramine (10.9 mg/kg)-induced increase of 5-HT levels in the prefrontal cortex and the imipramine (1.3; 10.9 mg/kg)-induced increase of 5-HT levels in the dorsal raphe nucleus. These results demonstrate that modafinil in low doses enhances the acute effects of fluoxetine and imipramine on 5-HT levels in the dorsal raphe nucleus (fluoxetine only) and especially in the prefrontal cortex of the awake rat. These findings suggest a therapeutic potential of low doses of modafinil in the treatment of depression when combined with low doses of classical antidepressants, especially by increasing 5-HT transmission in cortical regions.     

Differential effects of the 5-HT2 receptor antagonist on the anti-immobility effects of noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the forced swimming test

The effects of the 5-HT(2) receptor antagonist, LY 53857 on the effects of noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake inhibitors were investigated using the forced swimming test. LY 53857 enhanced anti-immobility effects of clomipramine and maprotiline, which can inhibit reuptake of noradrenaline. However, LY 53857 did not affect the immobility time of mice treated with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) fluoxetine and fluvoxamine. These results suggest that antagonism of the 5-HT(2) receptor leads to potentiation of the antidepressant effects of noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors but not SSRIs and that LY 53857 may modify the activity of noradrenergic neurons.     

Fluoxetine: an update of its use in major depressive disorder in adults

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have emerged as a major therapeutic advance in psychiatry. They have emphasized the pathophysiological role of serotonin (5-HT) in affective disorders. Indeed, SSRIs were developed for inhibition of the neuronal uptake for serotonin (5-HT), a property shared with the TCAs (tricyclic anti-depressants), but without affecting the other various central neuroreceptors (ie, histamine, acetylcholine and adrenergic receptors) that are responsible for many of the safety and tolerability problems with TCAs. In this way, fluoxetine and other SSRIs represent a major advance over tricyclics, because of their lower toxicity. While the position of fluoxetine relative to other selective serotoninergic antidepressants requires further investigation, fluoxetine has a more favorable tolerability profile for a similar efficacy in comparison to tricyclic antidepressants. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of fluoxetine are well described. After oral administration, fluoxetine is almost completely absorbed. Due to hepatic first-pass metabolism, the oral bioavailability is < 90%. Fluoxetine has a half-life of 2-7 days, whereas the half-life of norfluoxetine ranges between 4 and 15 days. This long half-life of fluoxetine may be advantageous when the patient omits a dose since drug concentrations decrease slightly. On the other hand, in the case of fluoxetine non-response, long washout periods are necessary before switching the patient to a TCA or a MAO inhibitor to avoid drug interactions or the development of a 5-HT syndrome. As a class, SSRIs are considerably more selective in comparison to TCAs in terms of their central nervous system mechanisms, but differ in other clinically relevant aspects. This action affects several specific 5-HT receptors, which, in turn, effects a multitude of neural systems and signalization pathways. However, despite the facilitating serotoninergic neurotransmission, the direct mechanism by which a SSRI exerts its anti-depressant activity remains uncertain. The therapeutic response in major depression for SSRIs (ie 15-20 days) maybe due to a progressive desensitization of somatodendritic 5-HT autoreceptors in the midbrain raphe nucleus. On the other hand, it has also been postulated that 5-HT is a modulator of several neurophysiological pathways, including dopamine, noradrenaline, but also neurotrophic factors, intra-cytoplasmic phosphorylations and nuclear genes expression. Therapeutic activity of SSRIs may finally results in a complex modulation and homeostasis between monoaminergic neurotransmisson and neuronal plasticity. In term of health-care, the introduction of fluoxetine and other SSRIs in the 1980s has radically changed the treatment of depressive disorder worldwide and they have emerged as the first line of treatment for depressive disorders. The efficacy of fluoxetine is now well established in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Indeed, this efficacy has been assessed in numerous clinical controlled trials involving patients with major depressive disorders. Meta-analysis were carried out and confirmed that fluoxetine was as effective as the tricyclic antidepressants, and appeared more effective than placebo in improving the symptoms of depression. However, there is no scientific evidence to suggest that any one SSRI is more effective than another, but not all patients respond to the same agent. Looking to the future, we need further comparative studies of the SSRIs with the next generation of antidepressants such as 5-HT noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs, Venlafaxine). Actually, it is interesting to note that, whereas the emphasis with the SSRIs has been on their selectivity, recent developments have tended to move towards less selective agents, and now to other neurobiological pathways (ie neurotrophic factors). Finally, fluoxetine, in common with other SSRIs, remains today a first-line treatment option for major depressive disorder.     

Sertraline-induced galactorrhea: case report and review of cases reported with other SSRIs

There is limited literature reporting galactorrhea with antidepressants including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). In this case report, I present a case of a young female who developed galactorrhea with sertraline, which improved on discontinuation of sertraline. Computer-assisted searches on galactorrhea with SSRIs yielded 23 cases, mostly with escitalopram and paroxetine and rarely with fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and sertraline, and it may be much more frequent than recognized.     

Zinc modulation of serotonin uptake in the adult rat corpus callosum

Antidepressants partially inhibit the uptake of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; serotonin) in the rat corpus callosum (CC), a white matter commissure involved in interhemispheric brain communication. It is also known that zinc modulates many proteins, including neurotransmitter transporters. We examined the effects of zinc on the uptake of 5-HT into slices of the adult rat CC, in the absence or presence of some antidepressants. Zinc increased 5-HT uptake in a concentration-dependent manner when the CC slices were incubated in a solution buffered with sodium bicarbonate; however, zinc exerted no effect on 5-HT transport when HEPES was the buffer. Potentiation of 5-HT uptake by zinc was maximal with 1 microM (45% over the control uptake). Moreover, 1 microM zinc potentiated 5-HT uptake in the cingulate cortex by 58% and in the Raphe nucleus by 65%. The antidepressants fluoxetine and imipramine inhibited 5-HT uptake in the CC by approximately 50%, whereas 6-nitroquipazine, a potent 5-HT uptake blocker, inhibited uptake by only 23%. Interestingly, inhibition of 5-HT uptake by all three substances, fluoxetine, imipramine, and 6-nitroquipazine, was counteracted by the presence of 1 microM zinc. Free zinc may thus contribute to modulation of extracellular levels of 5-HT and its removal. These actions should be considered in the treatment of mental depression with antidepressants.     

Effects of repeated treatment with fluoxetine and citalopram, 5-HT uptake inhibitors, on 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptors in the rat brain.

Repeated treatment with fluoxetine and citalopram, which are potent 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, resulted in different regulation of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptors in the rat brain. Their effects were compared with those of other antidepressants: imipramine, mianserin and levoprotiline. The density of 5-HT1A receptors, labelled with [3H]8-OH-DPAT, in the rat hippocampus was enhanced after citalopram, imipramine, mianserin and levoprotiline, but not altered after fluoxetine administration. [3H]Ketanserin binding sites, which label 5-HT2 receptors, were increased after fluoxetine and levoprotiline, but decreased after citalopram, imipramine and mianserin in the rat cerebral cortex. Acute administration of fluoxetine, but not citalopram, resulted in a decreased density of 5-HT1A receptors. 5-HT2 receptors were not changed by acute administration of either fluoxetine or citalopram. The obtained results indicate that besides 5-HT reuptake inhibiting properties of both compounds, there may exist an additional mechanism(s) of their action, which leads to different regulation of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptors.     

Acute and repeated administration of fluoxetine, citalopram, and paroxetine significantly alters the activity of midbrain dopamine neurons in rats: an in vivo electrophysiological study

We examined the effect of the administration of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) fluoxetine, citalopram, and paroxetine on the activity of spontaneously active dopamine (DA) neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNC) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) in anesthetized adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. This was accomplished using the technique of in vivo extracellular recording. A single injection of 2.5 mg/kg (i.p.) of fluoxetine significantly increased the number of spontaneously active SNC and VTA DA neurons. In contrast, a single injection of either 1 mg/kg (i.p.) of paroxetine or 5 mg/kg of fluoxetine significantly increased the number of spontaneously active VTA DA neurons. The repeated administration (one injection per day for 21 days) of all of the SSRIs produced a significant increase in the number of spontaneously active VTA DA neurons. Overall, our results indicate that the systemic administration of SSRI alters the activity of midbrain DA neurons with differential effects on VTA compared with SNC DA neurons.     

Distinguishing roles for norepinephrine and serotonin in the behavioral effects of antidepressant drugs

Antidepressant drugs have typically been classified into sets of compounds with actions targeted at serotonin (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs]), norepinephrine (norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [NRIs]), or both neurotransmitters (serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors). Their classification has been based predominantly on their acute pharmacologic effects, usually determined by in vitro radioligand binding assays. The pharmacologic selectivity of antidepressants can be altered after their systemic administration, however, by dose, drug metabolism, physiologic interactions between neurotransmitters, and adaptive effects that emerge after chronic administration. This review examines whether pharmacologic selectivity is maintained by different types of antidepressants in vivo and whether pharmacologic selectivity matters for the production of their behavioral effects. Antidepressants increase extracellular levels of neurotransmitters according to their ability to inhibit presynaptic transporters, although physiologic interactions among neurotransmitters can influence antidepressants' selectivity in certain brain regions. Chronic administration of many antidepressants also causes down-regulation of postsynaptic and presynaptic receptors. The pattern of responses of presynaptic markers suggests that pharmacologic selectivity is maintained after chronic administration of many antidepressants. Behavioral tests indicate that depletion of serotonin (5-HT) is capable of preventing the effects produced by SSRIs but not NRIs. The depletion of catecholamines also inhibits the effects of NRIs, although test results can be complicated by inhibition of motor activity. Depletion of norepinephrine may also inhibit the effects of some SSRIs, but not highly selective SSRIs like citalopram. Although the pattern of results from in vivo tests supports the concept that parallel neurotransmitter mechanisms lead to antidepressant activity, norepinephrine may participate in the effects of some SSRIs. It is also possible that compounds with dual actions at 5-HT and norepinephrine systems may be effective under circumstances in which selective antidepressants are ineffective.     

Effect of acute and chronic fluoxetine on extracellular dopamine levels in the caudate-putamen and nucleus accumbens of rat

Recent studies indicate that an increase in serotonergic (5-HT) activity in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) produces an increase in dopamine (DA) release, providing a possible mechanism for the involvement of DA in the therapeutic action of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants. However, acutely administered fluoxetine (2.5, 5.0, or 10.0 mg/kg, i.p.) failed to elevate extracellular levels of DA, or its metabolites in the NAc or caudate-putamen (CP). In fact, the highest dose produced a small (20%) decrease in DA levels in the NAc. Extracellular levels of the 5-HT metabolite 5HIAA were consistently decreased at all doses of fluoxetine in both structures. Since SSRIs generally require several weeks of treatment to be effective clinically, a second experiment examined the effect of chronic administration of fluoxetine. Chronic (21 day) daily treatment with 5 mg/kg had no effect on NAc basal levels of DA, DA metabolites, or 5HIAA, relative to a saline-treated control group. Finally, pretreatment with fluoxetine appeared to slightly enhance the elevation of NAc DA induced by an injection of cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.), an effect that was not quite significant (P < .06). In conclusion, the 5-HT-induced facilitation of NAc DA neurotransmission described in the literature may not be relevant to the therapeutic action of fluoxetine. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Modulation of antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal side effects by medications for mood disorders

Antipsychotic drugs are widely used not only for schizophrenia, but also for mood disorders such as bipolar disorder and depression. To evaluate the interactions between antipsychotics and drugs for mood disorders in modulating extrapyramidal side effects (EPS), we examined the effects of antidepressants and mood-stabilizing drugs on haloperidol (HAL)-induced bradykinesia and catalepsy in mice and rats. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), fluoxetine and paroxetine, and the tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) clomipramine, which showed no EPS by themselves, significantly potentiated HAL-induced bradykinesia and catalepsy in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, the noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant (NaSSA) mirtazapine failed to augment, but rather attenuated HAL-induced bradykinesia and catalepsy. Mianserin also tended to reduce the EPS induction. In addition, neither treatment with lithium, sodium valproate nor carbamazepine potentiated HAL-induced EPS. Furthermore, treatment of animals with ritanserin (5-HT2A/2C antagonist), ondansetron (5-HT3 antagonist), and SB-258585 (5-HT6 antagonist) significantly antagonized the EPS augmentation by fluoxetine. Intrastriatal injection of ritanserin or SB-258585, but not ondansetron, also attenuated the EPS induction. The present study suggests that NaSSAs are superior to SSRIs or TCAs in combined therapy for mood disorders with antipsychotics in terms of EPS induction. In addition, 5-HT2A/2C, 5-HT3 and 5-HT6 receptors seem to be responsible for the augmentation of antipsychotic-induced EPS by serotonin reuptake inhibitors.     

Influences of cholecystokinin antiserum on the dopamine,norepinephrine and serotonin contents of different brain regions in rats

The effects of intraventricular administration of cholecystokinin antiserum on the dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE) and serotonin (5-HT) contents of the hypothalamus, mesencephalon, amygdala, septum, striatum and cerebral cortex were tested 24 hr following injection in rats.Cholecystokinin antiserum decreased the DA and NE contents of the hypothalamus, mesencephalon, amygdala and septum, while it increased the DA and decreased the NE content of the striatum. In the cerebral cortex the NE content was decreased. The 5-HT contents decreased in the mesencephalon, amygdala and septum, and increased in the striatum.     

M100,907, a selective 5-HT(2A) antagonist, attenuates dopamine release in the rat medial prefrontal cortex

Previous research has suggested that serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptors modulate the functioning of the mesocortical dopamine (DA) pathway. However, the specific role of 5-HT(2A) receptors localized within the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is not known. The present study employed in vivo microdialysis to examine the role of this receptor in the modulation of basal and K(+)-stimulated (Ca(2+)-dependent) DA release. The selective 5-HT(2A) antagonist M100,907 was infused directly into the mPFC of conscious rats. This resulted in a concentration-dependent blockade of K(+)-stimulated DA release. Intracortical application of M100,907 also blocked increases in DA release produced by the systemic administration of the 5-HT(2A/2C) agonist, 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI). These findings demonstrate that local 5-HT(2A) antagonism has an inhibitory effect on stimulated, Ca(2+)-dependent DA release. They suggest that cortical 5-HT(2A) receptors potentiate the phasic release of mesocortical DA.     

Effect of corticotropin releasing factor receptor 1 antagonist on extracellular norepinephrine, dopamine and serotonin in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex of rats in vivo

Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) is a major mediator of adaptive responsiveness to stress. We measured changes in extracellular concentrations of catecholamine and indoleamines in freely moving rats in response to administration of CRF1 antagonist CP-154,526 by using in vivo microdialysis. Dialysis probes were placed stereotaxically in either the hippocampus or the prefrontal cortex. We examined the response in the hippocampus or the prefrontal cortex to 32.0 mg/kg i.p. administration of CP-154,526. CP-154,526 reduced the extracellular concentration of norepinephrine (NE) from 30 min to 180 min and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) from 30 min to 60 min after injection in the hippocampus. CP-154,526 did not remarkably change dopamine (DA). There were no significant differences between CP-154,526 and vehicle in NE, 5-HT and DA in the prefrontal cortex. The present results indicate that CRF1 receptor antagonist produced a decrease in dialysate concentration of NE and 5-HT, but not DA, in the hippocampus. These results suggest that the CRH-1 receptor antagonist suppresses the release of NE and 5-HT in the hippocampus.     

Cerebral perfusion response to successful treatment of depression with different serotoninergic agents

In 19 patients with major depressive disorder, effective treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or amesergide (AMSG) was associated with increased cerebral perfusion in anterior cingulate cortex (SSRI and AMSG) and in medial prefrontal cortex (AMSG). Both selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and AMSG exert antidepressant action through the serotonin (5-HT) system as reuptake inhibitors. Amesergide differs from SSRIs in that it is also a highly selective 5-HT antagonist, which may in part account for differences in cerebral blood flow response to treatment.     

Relevance of Norepinephrine–Dopamine Interactions in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder

Central dopaminergic and noradrenergic systems play essential roles in controlling several forebrain functions. Consequently, perturbations of these neurotransmissions may contribute to the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders. For many years, there was a focus on the serotonin (5‐HT) system because of the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), the most prescribed antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Given the interconnectivity within the monoaminergic network, any action on one system may reverberate in the other systems. Analysis of this network and its dysfunctions suggests that drugs with selective or multiple modes of action on dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) may have robust therapeutic effects. This review focuses on NE‐DA interactions as demonstrated in electrophysiological and neurochemical studies, as well as on the mechanisms of action of agents with either selective or dual actions on DA and NE. Understanding the mode of action of drugs targeting these catecholaminergic neurotransmitters can improve their utilization in monotherapy and in combination with other compounds particularly the SSRIs. The elucidation of such relationships can help design new treatment strategies for MDD, especially treatment‐resistant depression.