Evidence for Impaired Pancreatic Beta Cell Function in South African Indians with Impaired Glucose Tolerance

In a prospective study of South African Indians with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), the serum insulin response during a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was examined in 128 subjects who were classified as IGT 1 year previously (year 0) and in 60 matched control subjects. Based on the results at year 1, study subjects were divided into three groups, using World Health Organization criteria for glucose tolerance: IGT (n = 47), diabetes (n = 41), and transient IGT (normal glucose tolerance) (n = 40). When compared with the control group, despite higher plasma glucose concentrations, the IGT group showed similar fasting insulin, but lower 30-min insulin response (57.4 ± 1.9 mUI^?1 vs 86.5 ± 1.8, p<0.001) and lower 30-min insulin/glucose ratio (7.4 ± 5.2 vs 13.3 ± 8.7, p < 0.001). The insulinogenic index was lower in the IGT group than in the control group at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). The 2-h insulin response was higher in the IGT group (106.7 ± 1.9 mUI^?1 vs 59.2 ± 1.9, p < 0.01). The IGT group displayed a delayed pattern of insulin response with maximum levels only at 2-h. Insulin area was similar in the two groups. In the transient IGT group, despite similar plasma glucose levels, the insulin responses at 0, 15, 30, and 60 min (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively) were lower than in the control group; the 30-min insulin/glucose ratio (7.1 ± 5.1 vs 13.3 ± 8.7, p < 0.001) and 60-min insulinogenic index (46.9 ± 86.3 vs 123.4 ± 206.3, p < 0.001) were also lower in the transient IGT group. This study has shown that IGT in South African Indians is characterized by a diminished early phase insulin response and delayed (2-h) hyperinsulinaemia during OGTT. Such findings would suggest that in this population group impaired early beta cell function is an important pathophysiological abnormality underlying IGT.     

Insulin Deficiency and Increased Plasma Concentration of Intact and 32/33 Split Proinsulin in Subjects with Impaired Glucose Tolerance

In order to determine insulin status and beta cell function during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), in impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), 51 such subjects and matched controls, identified during a population survey for diabetes, underwent a 75 g OGTT. Fasting, 30 min and 2 h insulin and intact proinsulin, and fasting and 2 h 32/33 split proinsulin, were measured by specific two-site immunoradiometric assays. The subjects with IGT had higher fasting (geometric mean ± SD, 5.0 ± 4.0 pmol^?1 vs 2.9 ± 1.7, p < 0.02) and 2 h intact proinsulin (23 ± 14 vs 14 ± 12, p < 0.0001), and fasting (3.2 ± 3 pmol^?1 vs 1.8 ± 1.8, p < 0.0007) and 2 h 32/33 split proinsulin (18.3 ± 19 pmol^?1 vs 6.6 ± 15, p < 0.0001). Despite higher plasma glucose concentrations, the IGT group had similar fasting insulin, lower 30 min insulin (216 ± 124 pmol^?1 vs 278 ± 130, p < 0.02), and a lower 30 min insulin/glucose ratio (23.7 ± 2.1 vs 34.8 ± 2.3, p < 0.002). The percentage of fasting proinsulin-like to total insulin-like molecules was higher in those with IGT (15.3 ± 8% vs 11.6 ± 8, p < 0.04). After 6 months, at repeat OGTT, the same subjects with IGT were classified as ‘persisters’ or ‘reverters’. The persister (24/51 47.1%), at initial OGTT, had a higher 2 h glucose level, a greater BMI and higher systolic blood pressure, but other parameters were similar to the reverters. In the reverters, when baseline variables were compared to those recorded at six month follow-up, there was a reduction in 2 h intact (23.8 ± 13 pmol^?1 vs 19.4 = 10, p < 0.02) and 32/33 split proinsulin (20.4 ± 18 pmol^?1 vs 13.8 ± 13, p < 0.006), and an increase in fasting insulin (41 ± 30 pmol^?1 vs 54 ± 35, p < 0.02), respectively, despite no change in fasting glucose. These findings show that IGT is associated with beta cell dysfunction and reduced early insulin secretion during the OGTT. In some subjects with IGT these abnormalities show improvement in the short term.     

Understanding Oral Glucose Tolerance: Comparison of Glucose or Insulin Measurements During the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test with Specific Measurements of Insulin Resistance and Insulin Secretion

The extent to which the oral glucose tolerance test can be used to estimate insulin secretion and insulin resistance has been evaluated by comparing glucose and insulin concentrations during an oral glucose tolerance test with specific measurements of insulin secretion and insulin resistance in 85 normoglycaemic subjects and 23 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Insulin secretion was measured by the first phase insulin response to intravenous glucose and insulin resistance by the insulin tolerance test which measures the decline of plasma glucose after the injection of a bolus of insulin. The best measure of insulin secretion was the ratio of the 30 min increment in insulin concentration to the 30 min increment in glucose concentration following oral glucose loading. This correlated with the first phase insulin release following intravenous glucose (r=0.61, p < 0.001) but not insulin resistance (r= ?0.05, p >0.05). Insulin resistance could be estimated by the fasting insulin, proinsulin, or split proinsulin concentrations. However, fasting split proinsulin appeared to discriminate best between insulin resistance (r = ?0.53, p < 0.001) and insulin secretion (r = 0.07, p > 0.05). Relative insulin resistance estimated by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) also correlated well with insulin resistance (r= ?0.57, p < 0.001) but not insulin secretion (r= 0.01, p > 0.05). We conclude that the oral glucose tolerance test can be used to derive estimates of the relative roles of insulin secretion and insulin resistance in population studies of glucose tolerance.     

A Higher Proinsulin Response to Glucose Loading Predicts Deteriorating Fasting Plasma Glucose and Worsening to Diabetes in Subjects with Impaired Glucose Tolerance

To evaluate the clinical significance of proinsulin determination, we measured glucose, insulin, C-peptide and proinsulin during 75-g oral glucose loading in 59 patients. In a 2.5-year follow-up study of 37 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) at the initial test, 11 patients changed from IGT to a normal state and 5 patients showed worsening to overt Type 2 diabetes with elevation of fasting plasma glucose; 21 patients remained unchanged. Although our data showed that both fasting (IGT: p = 0.4523) and 120-min plasma glucose (IGT: p = 0.8168) values at the initial test were not significantly correlated with increased fasting plasma glucose levels in a 2.5-year follow-up study, subjects with a higher 120-min proinsulin response to glucose during the initial OGTT showed a significant correlation (IGT: p <0.0001) with increased fasting plasma glucose levels after follow-up period and developed Type 2 diabetes. The present findings suggest that the proinsulin response to glucose loading might be a useful indicator for predicting worsening to diabetes in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.     

Rosiglitazone improves insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance and ambulatory blood pressure in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.

AIMS: To determine the effects of rosiglitazone on insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance and ambulatory blood pressure when administered to subjects with persistent impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). METHODS: Eighteen subjects with persistent IGT were randomized to receive rosiglitazone 4 mg twice daily or matching placebo for 12 weeks. Evaluation at baseline and at the end of treatment included measurement of whole body insulin sensitivity during a euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp and deriving an insulin sensitivity index. Changes in glucose and insulin concentration were determined after oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and mixed meal tolerance tests, and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure was monitored. RESULTS: Rosiglitazone significantly improved the insulin sensitivity index by 2.26 micro g/kg per min per pmol/l relative to placebo (P = 0.0003). Four of nine subjects receiving rosiglitazone reverted to normal glucose tolerance and 5/9 remained IGT, although four of these had improved 2-h glucose values. In the placebo group, 1/9 subjects progressed to Type 2 diabetes and 8/9 remained IGT. Following OGTT and meal tolerance test, glucose and insulin area under curve were reduced over 3 and 4 h, respectively. Compared with placebo, ambulatory blood pressure decreased significantly in the rosiglitazone group by 10 mmHg systolic (P = 0.0066) and 8 mmHg diastolic (P = 0.0126). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with its effects in patients with Type 2 diabetes, rosiglitazone substantially improved whole body insulin sensitivity and the glycaemic and insulinaemic responses to an OGTT and meal tolerance test in subjects with persistent IGT. Furthermore, rosiglitazone reduced systolic and diastolic ambulatory blood pressure in these subjects.     

Subscapular skinfold thickness distinguishes between transient and persistent impaired glucose tolerance: Study on Lifestyle-Intervention and Impaired Glucose Tolerance Maastricht (SLIM).

AIMS: To assess whether adding anthropometric measurements to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) can help to distinguish between transient and persistent impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). METHODS: From the SLIM project (Study on Lifestyle-Intervention and IGT Maastricht), a study designed to evaluate whether diet and physical activity intervention can improve glucose tolerance in subjects at risk for diabetes, 108 subjects with IGT underwent a repeated OGTT 2-4 months after the initial OGTT. Following the second test, subjects were classified as transient IGT, or persistent IGT. Anthropometric measurements, including body mass index, waist and hip circumference, sagittal and transverse abdominal diameters and skinfold thickness measurements, were done during the second OGTT. RESULTS: Persistent IGT was diagnosed in 47 subjects (44%), transient IGT in 40 (37%), impaired fasting glucose in eight subjects (7%), and diabetes in 13 cases (12%). Two-hour blood glucose levels at the initial OGTT and subscapular skinfold thickness were significantly higher in subjects with persistent IGT (2-h blood glucose 9.8+/-0.1 mmol/l vs. 10.2+/-0.1 mmol/l for transient IGT and persistent IGT, respectively; subscapular skinfold thickness 25.4+/-1.4 mm vs. 29.8+/-1.2 mm for transient IGT and persistent IGT, respectively). After adjustment for age, sex and family history of diabetes mellitus, logistic regression indicated that 2-h blood glucose level during the initial OGTT represented the strongest predictor of persistent IGT (P<0.02), followed by subscapular skinfold thickness (P<0.05). After adjustment for 2-h blood glucose levels during the first OGTT, subscapular skinfold thickness remained significantly associated with persistent IGT (odds ratio 1.84; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the 2-h blood glucose level, subscapular skinfold thickness was the best predictor of persistent IGT, suggesting that adding simple anthropometric measures to oral glucose tolerance testing may improve the distinction between persistent and transient glucose intolerance.     

Distinguishing between persistent and transient impaired glucose tolerance using a prediction model.

Screening for impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and Type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetes was carried out in 777 people and those with high blood glucose levels completed three 2-h oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT). Blood lipid levels, fasting and 2-h insulin levels, body mass index, and blood pressure were also measured and family history of Type 2 diabetes recorded. Fifty people were identified with IGT and of these 21 were found to have persistent IGT and 29 transient IGT. A model including the variables body mass index, fasting and 2-h insulin levels, fasting triglycerides and family history of Type 2 diabetes was developed using the Speigelhalter-Knill-Jones weighting method to predict subjects with persistent IGT. This model could be useful in identifying people with persistent IGT and therefore eliminate the need for repeat OGTTs which are time consuming and expensive.     

Impaired beta cell glucose sensitivity and whole-body insulin sensitivity as predictors of hyperglycaemia in non-diabetic subjects

Aims/hypothesis The aim of this prospective study was to investigate predictors of deteriorating glucose tolerance in subjects of British extraction. Methods A total of 156 non-diabetic subjects (86 with a family history of type 2 diabetes) underwent a 75-g OGTT and anthropometric assessment at baseline and 5 years later. Pancreatic beta cell function and whole-body insulin sensitivity were studied by model assessment. Subjects were classified as progressors if glucose tolerance moved one or more steps from normal, impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes over the follow-up period. Results At baseline, the progressors (n=22) had increased adiposity and a higher proportion of familial diabetes and abnormal glucose tolerance than non-progressors. Baseline pancreatic beta cell sensitivity to changes in glucose (p<0.02) and whole-body insulin sensitivity (p<0.0001) were decreased in the progressors. Logistic regression revealed that baseline and follow-up changes in beta cell glucose sensitivity and insulin sensitivity, rather than the classical clinical predictors (adiposity, familial diabetes and glucose levels), were the key independent predictors of progression (explaining over 50% of the progression). Conclusions/interpretation Impaired pancreatic beta cell glucose sensing and whole-body insulin sensitivity predict progression to hyperglycaemia. Strikingly, these pathophysiological changes override the importance of the clinical risk factors and highlight potential metabolic targets for prevention strategies. An erratum to this article can be found at     

Effects of Heparin-induced Non-esterified Free Fatty Acid on Minimal Model-derived Insulin Sensitivity in Individuals with Varying Degrees of Glucose Intolerance

The effects of heparin-induced non-esterified free fatty acid (NEFA) release on insulin sensitivity index were studied in individuals with varying degrees of glucose intolerance and beta cell dysfunction during the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). The groups comprised: Group 1 (n = 5): newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetic patients, Group 2 (n = 11): impaired glucose tolerance patients (IGT), and Group 3 (n = 16): healthy normal glucose tolerance subjects. The serum insulin and c-peptide levels were severely blunted in the diabetic patients when compared to both non-diabetic groups. Mean fasting and post-heparin plasma NEFA levels were approximately 1.8 fold greater (p < 0.05) in the diabetic patients when compared to the other two groups. The mean insulin sensitivity index was lowest in the diabetic patients, intermediate in the IGT patients, and highest in the healthy controls. A significant negative relationship was found between the insulin sensitivity index and stimulated NEFA (r = ?0.537, p < 0.008) but not with the fasting NEFA levels in our subjects. In summary, the frequently sampled IVGTT protocol that employs heparin flushes results in marked elevations in NEFA in Type 2 diabetic patients with poor beta cell dysfunction but not in subjects with intermediate or normal glucose tolerance. The higher plasma NEFA levels during heparin injections could worsen the model-derived, insulin sensitivity index and could impair the ability to achieve an acceptable modelling in Type 2 diabetic patients. We therefore suggest heparin should be avoided in such patients when using this protocol.     

Early insulin secretion failure leads to diabetes in Chinese subjects with impaired glucose regulation

Background Both beta‐cell dysfunction and decreased insulin sensitivity are involved in the pathogenesis of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG), while their relative contribution in the progression to type 2 diabetes still remains controversial. The aim of the present study is to clarify this process in Chinese subjects by using cross‐sectional method. Methods 2975 Chinese subjects were classified into: normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose regulations (IGR), and diabetes mellitus (DM) based on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The IGR group was sub‐classified as isolated IFG, isolated IGT and combined glucose intolerance (CGI). The DM group was sub‐classified as normal fasting plasma glucose and 2‐hour hyperglycemia (N0D2), fasting hyperglycemia and normal 2‐hour plasma glucose (D0N2), and both fasting and 2‐hour hyperglycemia (D0D2). Results As far as insulinogenic index (IGI) was concerned, there was no difference between IFG and IGT in either gender, however, HOMA2‐B% (homeostasis model assessment for beta‐cell function) of IGT was higher than that of IFG and CGI in both male and female (P < 0.05). In the diabetic sub‐groups, IGI of N0D2 was higher than that of D0N2, and both deteriorated compared with those of IGT and IFG, respectively. HOMA2‐B% of N0D2 was still higher than that of D0N2 and D0D2. No significant difference was detected in OGIS and HOMA2‐S% (homeostasis model assessment for insulin sensitivity) between IFG and IGT, and this was the case between N0D2 and D0N2. OGIS and HOMA‐IR of IGR sub‐groups were not different from those of their diabetic counterparts. Conclusion Failure of beta‐cell function might be the main reason for both IGT and IFG developing into diabetes instead of aggravated insulin resistance. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Relationship between glucose tolerance,insulin secretion,and insulin action in non-obese individuals with varying degrees of glucose tolerance

Summary Plasma glucose and insulin concentration following a 75 g oral glucose challenge and glucose uptake during a hyperinsulinaemic glucose clamp study were determined in 50 non-obese individuals. The study population was divided into five groups on the basis of their glucose tolerance: normal, impaired glucose tolerance, Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus with fasting plasma glucose of less than 8 mmol/l, between 8–15 mmol/l, and more than 15 mmol/l. The plasma insulin response was significantly greater (p<0.001) than normal in those with either impaired glucose tolerance or Type 2 diabetes and a fasting plasma glucose concentration less than 8 mmol/l. In contrast, the plasma insulin response was similar to normal in the other two groups of patients with Type 2 diabetes, i.e. fasting plasma glucose concentration 8–15 mmol/l or greater than 15 mmol/l. Glucose uptake rates were significantly lower (p<0.001) than normal in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and all three groups of patients with Type 2 diabetes. Although glucose uptake rates during the glucose clamp studies were relatively similar in all four groups of glucose intolerant subjects, the values were significantly lower in those patients with Type 2 diabetes who had a fasting plasma glucose concentration greater than 8 mmol/l (p<0.01), These data indicate that a significant degree of insulin resistance exists in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or Type 2 diabetes, relatively independent of fasting plasma glucose concentration. Indeed, glucose uptake during glucose clamp studies fell 8-fold over a range in fasting plasma glucose concentration of from 4.5 to 6.5 mmol/l. In contrast, the plasma insulin response increased over the same range of fasting plasma glucose concentrations. The fact that this defect in insulin action can be seen in patients who are hyperinsulinaemic, not hypoinsulinaemic, and only modestly hyperglycaemic, is consistent with the hypothesis that resistance to insulin-stimulate glucose uptake is a basic characteristic of patients with impaired glucose tolerance or Type 2 diabetes.     

Insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in diabetic subgroups: studies in the prediabetic and diabetic state

Aims/hypothesis. To evaluate insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in prediabetic and diabetic subjects with mutations in MODY1 (HNF-4α) and MODY3 (HNF-1α) genes, in subjects with GAD antibodies, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults and in subjects with the common form of Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Methods. Insulin secretion was measured as the incremental 30-min insulin (I30) and insulin glucose ratio (I:G30) during OGTT whereas insulin sensitivity was measured as the insulin sensitivity index during OGTT in 131 carriers of MODY mutations [NGT = 38, IFG/IGT = 21, diabetes mellitus (DM) = 72], in 293 subjects with GADA (NGT = 47, IFG/IGT = 29, DM = 217) and in 2961 subjects with a family history of the common form of Type II diabetes but without MODY mutations or GADA (NGT = 1360, IFG/IGT = 857, DM = 744). A subgroup of the subjects underwent a euglycaemic clamp (n = 210) and intravenous glucose tolerance test (n = 337) for the estimation of insulin sensitivity and first-phase insulin secretion. Results. Non-diabetic subjects with MODY mutations had pronounced impaired insulin secretion (I30, I:G30) compared with the two other groups (p = 0.005). Normal or non-diabetic glucose tolerance was maintained by enhanced insulin sensitivity compared with the other two groups (p < 0.05 and p < 0.005). In contrast to patients with Type II diabetes and with adult latent autoimmune diabetes, MODY patients showed only a modest deterioration in insulin sensitivity at onset of diabetes. The 2-h glucose values inversely correlated with insulin sensitivity in subjects with GADA (r = –0.447, p < 0.001) and subjects from Type II diabetic families (r = –0.426, p < 0.001), whereas no such relation was observed in subjects with MODY mutations (r = 0.151, p = NS). There were no statistically significant differences in insulin secretion or insulin sensitivity between subjects with GADA or subjects with a family history of Type II diabetes, either at the NGT or the IFG/IGT stage. Conclusion/interpretation. Glucose-tolerant carriers of MODY mutations are characterised by a severe impairment in insulin secretion. Enhanced insulin sensitivity is the most likely explanation for the normal glucose tolerance. Whereas subjects with positive GADA or Type II diabetes have impaired insulin sensitivity with increasing glucose concentrations, MODY mutation carriers seem to be protected from the effect of glucose toxicity. [Diabetologia (2000) 43: 1476–1483] Received: 23 March 2000 and in revised form: 29 August 2000     

Hyperglycaemic Progression in Subjects with Impaired Glucose Tolerance: Association with Decline in Beta Cell Function

Impaired glucose tolerance is associated with an increased risk of Type 2 diabetes. This prospective cohort study has examined the variables associated with hyperglycaemic progression in order to elucidate the aetiology of this deterioration. The 5 mg glucose-kg ideal body weight-min^?1 continuous infusion of glucose with model assessment (CIGMA) test was used to quantitate glucose tolerance, beta cell function, and insulin sensitivity. Twenty-two Caucasian subjects who had impaired glucose tolerance identified on two separate tests underwent repeat testing after a median period of 24 months. At follow-up, 2 of the 22 subjects (9%) had Type 2 diabetes, 18 (82%) had impaired glucose tolerance, and 2 (9%) were normoglycaemic. The fasting and achieved (60-min) glucose levels were significantly higher at follow-up (mean ± SD) (5.7 ± 0.8 vs 5.5 ± 0.5 mmol l^?1, p = 0.029 and 10.0 ± 0.9 vs 9.6 ± 0.6 mmol l^?1, p = 0.021, respectively), and beta cell function was significantly lower (median and interquartile range): 75% (50–93%) vs 90% (70–135%), p = 0.009. The changes in fasting plasma glucose were found to correlate with change in body mass index (r_s = 0.46, p = 0.03). We conclude that impaired glucose tolerance is associated with decline in beta cell function, and denotes substantial risk of hyperglycaemic progression. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to determine whether exercise programmes, dietary advice, and attentive follow-up and effective preventive strategies for subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.     

Peripheral and hepatic insulin sensitivity in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance

Summary Recent evidence suggests that the post-prandial hyperglycaemia in impaired glucose tolerance is primarily due to impaired suppression of basal hepatic glucose output. This in turn appears to be secondary to decreased first phase insulin secretion, although decreased hepatic insulin sensitivity, which is a feature of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, might also play a role. Eight mildly overweight subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and eight closely matched control subjects with normal glucose tolerance underwent an intravenous glucose tolerance test to assess first phase insulin secretion. Insulin sensitivity was examined by a 150-min hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp. Somatostatin was infused from 150 min to suppress endogenous insulin secretion, and glucagon and insulin were replaced by constant infusion. Glucose with added dideuterated glucose (labelled infusion technique) was infused to maintain euglycaemia. First phase insulin secretion ( 0–10 min insulin area ÷ 0–10 min glucose area) was significantly decreased in the subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (median [range]: 1.2 [0.2–19.4] vs 9.1 [2.6–14.5] mU·mmol^–1; p<0.01). During the clamp, circulating insulin (93±8 [mean±SEM] and 81±10 mU·l^–1) and glucagon (54±4 and 44±6 ng·l^–1) levels were comparable. Total glucose disposal was decreased in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (2.78±0.27 vs 4.47±0.53 mg·kg^–1·min^–1; p<0.02), and was primarily due to decreased non-oxidative glucose disposal. However, hepatic glucose output rates were comparable during the clamp (0.38±0.10 and 0.30±0.18 mg·kg^–1·min^–1). Therefore, the main defects in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance are decreased first phase insulin secretion and peripheral non-oxidative glucose disposal, but hepatic glucose output shows normal responsiveness to insulin.Abbreviations FPIS First phase insulin secretion - PG plasma glucose - NIDDM non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus - IGT impaired glucose tolerance - HGO hepatic glucose output - IVGTT intravenous glucose tolerance test - OGTT oral glucose tolerance test     

Long-term beneficial effects of glipizide treatment on glucose tolerance in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance

AIMS: To assess the efficacy and long-term effects of glipizide treatment on glucose and insulin metabolism in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). METHODS: Thirty-seven first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes fulfilling WHO criteria for IGT were randomized to treatment with either glipizide 2.5 mg once daily or matching placebo for 6 months. A 75 g, 2-h oral (OGTT) and 60 min intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) were performed at baseline and after 6 months. The subjects were followed up for another 12 months after discontinuation of treatment and a repeat OGTT was performed at 18 months. RESULTS: Thirty-three subjects fulfilled the study. Markers of insulin sensitivity - i.e. fasting insulin and HOMA(IR)-index - improved in the glipizide group (P = 0.04 and 0.02 respectively) as well as HDL cholesterol (P = 0.05) compared with placebo group after 6 months. At 18 months, both fasting and 2 h glucose concentrations were significantly lower in the glipizide group compared with the placebo group (P = 0.04 and 0.03 respectively). The prevalence of type 2 diabetes was 29.4% in the placebo group and 5.9% in the glipizide group at 18 months. This equals an 80% relative risk reduction in the active treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment with glipizide improves glucose and insulin metabolism in subjects with IGT primarily by improving insulin sensitivity mediated by lowering glucose toxicity, thereby providing the beta cells rest. Larger studies are needed to establish whether these effects are sufficient to prevent progression to manifest type 2 diabetes and associated cardiovascular morbidity in subjects at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes.     

Impaired glucose tolerance and fasting hyperglycaemia have different characteristics.

AIMS: Use of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to define glucose intolerance in the general population may bias towards selection of those with insulin resistance. Beta cell function and insulin resistance markers were analysed in four groups: controls (n = 101); fasting hyperglycaemia (FH, n 45); impaired glucose tolerance; (IGT, n = 16) and those with features of both FH and IGT ('Both', n = 30). METHODS: Subjects underwent an OGTT. Plasma glucose, fasting lipid profiles, fasting, 30 and 120 min insulin were measured and beta cell function (% B) and insulin sensitivity (% S) assessed by homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) RESULTS: The FH group compared to controls had a significantly lower % B. The IGT group compared to controls had features of insulin resistance (higher body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure and 2 h insulin concentration). Subjects with 'both' IGT and FH had features of insulin resistance (higher BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and triglyceride concentration) as well as beta cell dysfunction with a lower % B and 30 min insulin-glucose ratio compared to controls. There was a preponderance of males in this group. In all, 192 subjects' 30-min insulin concentration and incremental insulin response showed only a significantly negative correlation with fasting glucose concentration. In a linear regression analysis, a low 30-min insulin-glucose ratio was only a significant factor in the fasting glucose model. Thus, higher fasting glucose concentrations appear to be associated with beta cell dysfunction. However, HbA1 only showed a significant correlation with 120-min glucose, not fasting glucose concentration. CONCLUSIONS: In those with milder degrees of glucose intolerance, FH is associated with beta cell dysfunction and those with IGT and a relatively 'normal' fasting glucose have features of the insulin resistance syndrome.     

Beta cell dysfunction in patients with acute myocardial infarction but without previously known type 2 diabetes: a report from the GAMI study

Aims/hypothesis Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) but without previously known type 2 diabetes have a high prevalence of undiagnosed IGT and type 2 diabetes. Such perturbations have dismal prognostic implications. The aim of this study was to characterise AMI patients in terms of insulin resistance and beta cell function.Methods A total of 168 consecutive AMI patients were classified by means of an OGTT before hospital discharge as having NGT, IGT or type 2 diabetes. The homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) was used to estimate insulin resistance. Beta cell responsiveness was quantified as insulinogenic index (IGI) at 30 min (I₃₀/G₃₀).Results According to the HOMA-IR, patients with type 2 diabetes were more insulin resistant than those with IGT or NGT (p=0.003). Beta cell responsiveness deteriorated with decreasing glucose tolerance as measured by the IGI (median [quartile 1, quartile 3] in pmol/mmol: NGT, 70.1 [42.7, 101.4]; IGT, 48.7 [34.7, 86.8], type 2 diabetes, 38.1 [25.7, 61.6]; p<0.001). The IGI was significantly related to admission capillary blood glucose (r=–0.218, p=0.010) and to the area under the curve for glucose (r=–0.475, p<0.001).Conclusions/interpretation Glucose abnormalities are very common in patients with AMI but without previously known type 2 diabetes. To a significant extent, this seems to be related to impaired beta cell function and implies that dysglycaemia immediately after an infarction is not a stress epiphenomenon but reflects stable disturbances of glucose regulation preceding the AMI. Early beta cell dysfunction may have important pathophysiological implications and may serve as a future target for treatment strategies.     

The Acute Effect of Preprandial Exogenous and Endogenous Sulphonylurea-stimulated Insulin Secretion on Postprandial Glucose Excursions in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Sulphonylureas improve glucose tolerance by stimulating insulin secretion. Whether improved glucose tolerance results from enhanced early insulin release or greater total insulin secretion is not clear. Insulin responses to a test meal in Type 2 diabetic subjects with and without a single dose (2.5 mg) of oral and intravenous glipizide were, therefore, measured. Intravenous glipizide enhanced early insulin release more than oral glipizide (134% and 80% vs control; p<0.01), whereas total insulin release was equally improved (78% and 54% vs control; p<0.01). Despite slight differences in insulin release, there was no difference in glucose tolerance (median area under concentration curve (AUC); 66.6 vs 61.9 mmol × min I^?1; NS). The test meal was repeated after a bolus of intravenous insulin at the beginning of the meal. This allowed comparison of the effect of exogenous and endogenous insulin supply on postprandial glucose excursions. In spite of an early and fivefold larger rise in serum insulin after intravenous administration of the hormone than after intravenous glipizide (725% vs 134%; p<0.01), postprandial glucose was no better than after glipizide (median AUC; 87.8 vs 66.6 mmol × min I^?1; NS). In contrast, glucose tolerance was better after oral glipizide compared to intravenous insulin (median AUC; 61.9 vs 87.8 mmol × min I^?1; p<0.05). In conclusion, the total amount of insulin secreted seems more important than the timing of the insulin release for the postprandial glucose tolerance in Type 2 diabetic subjects. Neither endogenous nor peripheral pre-meal supply of insulin could normalize postprandial glucose excursions in patients with Type 2 diabetes.     

High prevalence of abnormal glucose homeostasis secondary to decreased insulin secretion in individuals with hereditary haemochromatosis

Aims/hypothesis The prevalence and mechanisms of diabetes in hereditary haemochromatosis are not known. We therefore measured glucose tolerance, insulin secretory capacity and insulin sensitivity in adults with haemochromatosis.Subjects and methods Subjects recruited from referrals to a haemochromatosis clinic underwent OGTT and frequently sampled IVGTT. A chart review of former clinic patients was also performed.Results The prevalence of diabetes (23%) and IGT (30%) was increased in haemochromatosis compared with matched control subjects (0% diabetes and 14% IGT). Subjects with haemochromatosis and diabetes were overweight (14%) or obese (86%). The prevalence of diabetes, as determined by chart review of fasting glucose values, in subjects who had haemochromatosis and were in the 40–79 years age range was 26%. Overall, patients with haemochromatosis and control subjects had similar values for acute insulin response to glucose and insulin sensitivity. However, patients with haemochromatosis and IGT had a 68% decrease in acute insulin response to glucose (p<0.02) compared with those with NGT. They were not insulin-resistant, exhibiting instead a 62% increase in insulin sensitivity (NS). Haemochromatosis subjects with diabetes exhibited further declines in acute insulin response to glucose, insulin resistance, or both.Conclusions/interpretation Diabetes and IGT are common in haemochromatosis, justifying screening for diabetes and therapeutic phlebotomy. The major abnormality associated with IGT is decreased insulin secretory capacity. Diabetes is usually associated with obesity and concomitant insulin resistance.     

不同状态的糖调节受损患者胰岛素分泌和胰岛素敏感性的差异

目的评估初发的单纯空腹血糖受损（IFG）和单纯糖耐量受损（IGT）患者的胰岛素分泌以及胰岛素敏感性（IS）特征。方法北京市东城区既往无糖尿病史的2388名受试者行葡萄糖耐量试验,同时行胰岛素释放试验,本文纳入2244例,其中糖耐量正常（NGT）1608例,IFG240例,IGT243例,IFG＋IGT 153例。比较各组胰岛素抵抗指数（HOMA-IR）、IS指数（Matsudaindex）、B细胞功能指数（1相Stumvoll index、△I30／△G30）。结果与NGT组比较,其余三组HOMA-IR显著升高,Matsuda指数及B细胞功能指数均显著降低（P均〈0．01）;IFG组HOMA-IR及Matsuda指数均高于IGT组;IFG组△I30／△G30高于IGT组,而Stumvoll指数低于IGT组（P〈0．01）;与IFG组、IGT组比较,IFG＋IGT组HOMA-IR显著升高,Matsuda指数、1相Stumvoll指数显著降低（P均〈0．01）。结论糖尿病前期人群存在不同程度的胰岛素分泌缺陷和IR,IFG组肝IR较重,而IGT组肌肉IR较重。