Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidents and complications. A retrospective analysis of 9542 consecutive laparoscopic operations

BackgroundEven though laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the customary method for treating gallstones, some incidents and complications appear rather more frequently than with the open technique. Several aspects of these complications and their treatment possibilities are analysed.Materials and methodsOver the last 9 years 9542 LCs have been performed at this centre, of which 13.9% were carried out for acute cholecystitis, 38.4% in obese patients and 7.6% in patients aged >65 years.ResultsThe main operative incidents encountered were haemorrhage (224 cases, 2.3%), iatrogenic perforation of the gallbladder (1517 cases, 15.9%) and common bile duct (CBD) injuries (17 cases, 0.1%). Conversion to open operation was necessary in 184 patients (1.9%), usually due to obscure anatomy as a result of acute inflammation. The main postoperative complications were bile leakage (54 cases), haemorrhage (15 cases), sub-hepatic abscess (10 cases) and retained bile duct stones (11 cases). Ten deaths were recorded (0.1%).DiscussionMost of the postoperative incidents (except bile duct injuries) were solved by laparoscopic means. Among patients with postoperative complications 28.9% required revisional surgery. In 42.2% of cases minimally invasive procedures were used successfully: 15 laparoscopic re-operations (for choleperitoneum, haemoperitoneum and subhepatic abscess) and 22 endoscopic sphincterotomies (for bile leakage from the subhepatic drain and for retained CBD stones soon after operation). The good results obtained allow us to recommend these minimally invasive procedures in appropriate patients.     

Complications of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Summary: Fourteen papers clearly describing morbidity and mortality are evaluated to assess the frequency of major operative and postoperative accidents or complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the key technical points important in the prevention of bile duct injury which is the most common operative complication during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A total of 108, 612 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed in these series. Technical complications relating to the cause of death were encountered in 22 out of 49 cases (44.9%) and the mortality rate was 0.02%. The most common reason for conversion was difficult adhesions around the gallbladder, unclear anatomy of Carot's triangle and bile duct injury. Moreover bile duct injury was the most common technical complication, although injury to the major vessels and intestine led to higher mortality rates than common bile duct injury. Almost all authors have postulated in their papers that the majority of these major complications occured at institutions operating on less than 100 cases. These facts suggest that technical complications can be minimized by guidelines for prevention of operative injury, namely adequate training and experience in humans. In this paper, our technique was introduced and the importance of how to explore Carot's triangle is emphasized to prevent bile duct injury.     

Combination of Preoperative EST,Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Choledochotomy,and Postoperative Cholangioscopy in the Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones

A case of common duct stones, successfully managed with a combination of preoperative EST, laparoscopic choledochotomy and postoperative choledochoscopic stone extraction, is reported. A 32-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of jaundice and right hypochon-dralgia of several-days' duration. CT, US and ERCP revealed stones in the gallbladder and common bile duct. EST was performed to remove the stones in the common bile duct prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, the patient developed pancreatitis as a complication of EST, which was successfully managed by conservative therapy. Though some stones remained in the common duct following the first trial of EST, the patient rejected a second round of EST. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and choledochotomy were performed to remove the gallbladder and the stones remaining in the common bile duct. A T tube was placed in the incised common bile duct for management of possible retained stones. Twenty days after the surgery, successful postoperative cholangioscopy was performed, and the stones remaining in the common duct were removed. Hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis are relatively common complications of EST occurring in about 7% of cases, but only 3% of these patients experience severe pancreatitis, requiring hospitalization. Conservative therapy is always the treatment of choice. In our particular patient, pancreatitis caused by EST was successfully managed by decompression with ENBD and administration of ulinastatin. Residual stones in the CBD were completely removed by laparoscopic common bile duct exploration following EST and postoperative cholangioscopy through the T tube fistula.     

Management of unsuspected common bile duct stones found during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by means of transcystic catheter placement and papillary dilation

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for treatment of bile duct stones first diagnosed during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has not been established. We prospectively treated unsuspected bile duct stones by means of intraoperative placement of a transcystic catheter followed by postoperative pharmacologic papillary dilation or endoscopic papillary balloon dilation. METHODS: In 17 patients with bile duct stones first found at laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a catheter was introduced via the cystic duct into the bile duct. If postoperative cholangiography via a transcystic catheter showed stones 5 mm or less in diameter, glyceryl trinitrate was infused via the catheter into the bile duct. Patients in whom medical dilation was unsuccessful or who had larger stones underwent endoscopic papillary balloon dilation. RESULTS: Stone diameter measured 3 to 11 mm (mean 6.4 mm). Postoperative cholangiography revealed spontaneous passage in four patients. After pharmacologic papillary dilation, two of five patients with stones 5 mm or less in diameter had stone clearance. The remaining 11 patients underwent successful endoscopic papillary balloon dilation with stone clearance. In two patients, a guidewire introduced via a transcystic catheter through the papilla facilitated selective biliary cannulation. One early minor complication occurred. All patients remained without symptoms for a mean follow-up of 13 months. CONCLUSION: For unsuspected bile duct stones (usually small ones), this strategy is a simple and effective alternative to laparoscopic bile duct exploration and postoperative sphincterotomy and may minimize early and late complications. Transcystic catheterization ensures access to the bile duct, thereby avoiding endoscopic treatment failures.     

Selective preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with sphincterotomy avoids bile duct exploration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

A policy of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) for suspected bile duct stones was used in 1507 patients considered for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in three district general hospitals. Altogether 306 patients underwent ERC, and bile duct cannulation was achieved in 276 (90%). Bile ducts were cleared by endoscopic sphincterotomy in 128 of 161 patients (79%) with proven duct stones. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was completed in 1396 patients. Ten laparotomies were necessary for complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The complication rate for endoscopic sphincterotomy/laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 2.7%, with no mortality. Overall, a combined endoscopic/laparoscopic approach succeeded in 1386 patients (92%). Fourteen patients (1%) had retained stones during a median of 14 months (range 1-42) follow up, all of which were removed by ERC/endoscopic sphincterotomy. If a policy of selective ERC before laparoscopic cholecystectomy is used for all patients with symptomatic gall stones, most will avoid an open operation and laparoscopic exploration of the bile duct is not necessary.     

Sphincterotomy in patients with gallstones, elevated LFTs and a normal CBD on ERCP

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine whether an endoscopic sphincterotomy affects outcome in patients with symptomatic gallstones, elevated liver function tests and a normal common bile duct on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram. METHODOLOGY: A total of 163 patients with symptomatic gallstones and elevated liver function tests, and found to have a normal common bile duct on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram were included in the study. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in 78 (47.8%) patients, while 85 (52.1%) patients did not have an endoscopic sphincterotomy. The two groups were compared for detection of small unseen common bile duct stones/debris, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram related complications, and biliary complications after cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Small common bile duct stones/debris were recovered in 11/43 (25.5%) patients who had instrumentation of the common bile duct performed after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Common bile duct instrumentation was not performed in any of the patients without endoscopic sphincterotomy. No patient had any biliary complication after cholecystectomy, both in the immediate postoperative period and on a follow-up of 37.5 +/- 13.6 months (range 17-66). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram related complications occurred in 8 patients who had an endoscopic sphincterotomy and in 2 without endoscopic sphincterotomy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Performing an endoscopic sphincterotomy in these patients increases the detection of small unseen common bile duct stones/debris without changing the clinical outcome after cholecystectomy. It also increases the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram related complication rate, and therefore may not be necessary.     

Role of ERCP and Therapeutic Biliary Endoscopy in Association with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic removal is rapidly becoming the preferred method of cholecystectomy; however, choledocholithiasis cannot usually be managed with a laparoscopic approach. Combined endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a potential solution to this problem. To determine the feasibility of this combined procedure we studied 41 patients who had both endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indications for ERCP included jaundice, gallstone pancreatitis, dilated ducts on sonography, elevated liver enzymes, or stones seen on operative cholangiography. Twenty-eight patients had ERCP preoperatively. Nine patients had common duct stones; these were successfully removed from eight patients after sphincterotomy. Two patients had unexpected strictures requiring a change in surgical approach. Thirteen patients had ERCP postoperatively. Eight of those patients had common duct stones, and all were successfully removed following endoscopic sphincterotomy. Three patients had postoperative strictures, one of which was treated by endoscopic stent placement. No complications as a result of ERCP or sphincterotomy were encountered. ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy can be safely performed both preoperatively and as early as 1 day postoperatively. If indicators of choledocholithiasis are present, preoperative ERCP is preferred, because stone removal occasionally is unsuccessful, and cholangiographic findings may change the operative approach. Postoperative ERCP can define and, in some instances, treat biliary tract injuries resulting from laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Diagnostic and therapeutic application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

BACKGROUND--Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, introduced less than 2 years ago, is widely accepted by patients and physicians despite the lack of controlled trials comparing this technology with conventional cholecystectomy. Recent series have described a variable incidence of biliary tract injury with laparoscopic gallbladder removal. The primary interaction of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with this technology is usually in the preoperative or postoperative diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones. METHODS--During a 12-month period, 597 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy by 20 general surgeons at six Puget Sound (Wash) hospitals. All patients with symptomatic postoperative biloma diagnosed by abdominal ultrasound or computed tomography with or without endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, as well as those who had acute bile duct injury diagnosed and repaired at the time of cholecystectomy, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS--Three bile duct transections were acutely recognized and treated with hepaticojejunostomy. Fourteen additional patients presented within 7 days with biloma, three of whom were treated with percutaneous drainage alone. Of the remaining 11 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, six were noted to have common bile duct injuries; two, bile duct transections; and 3, cystic duct leaks that required a variety of endoscopic or surgical therapies. In all, 17 (2.9%) of 597 patients sustained a bile duct injury and, to date, seven (1.2%) of 597 patients required surgery for such injury. CONCLUSIONS--In a regional setting, laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to be associated with a higher incidence of bile duct injury than previous reports of open cholecystectomy. Possible explanations include variant anatomy plus failure to obtain an operative cholangiogram, inadequate dissection, injudicious use of cautery or clip placement, inherent limitations of the procedure, or the learning curve associated with a new technology.     

Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 1522 cases

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy are serious complications. The incidence of this complication increases compared with open cholecystectomy. The aim of this paper has been to audit the incidence and nature of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a single center. METHODOLOGY: From January 1991 to September 2000, all laparoscopic cholecystectomy attempts performed in Rajavithi Hospital were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 1522 procedures performed, there were 9 (0.59%) cases of bile duct injuries. These involved the common hepatic duct (n=3) and the common bile duct (n=6). The underlying gallbladder pathology included chronic cholecystitis (n=6), Mirizzi's syndrome (n=2), and acute cholecystitis (n=1). Transection of the duct accounted for the majority of the injuries. Six bile duct injuries were identified at the time of operation. These were primarily repaired by direct suture (n=1) or by a biliary-enteric anastomosis (n=5). In the remaining three patients, the diagnosis was delayed. Two patients presented with a large amount of bile from the drain after surgery and one patient presented with jaundice. These were repaired by direct suture over a T tube (n=1) or biliary-enteric anastomosis (n=2). One patient developed recurrent cholangitis following biliary-enteric anastomosis after delayed diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of a 0.59% incidence of bile duct injury is comparable to the best results from most large series in the West. Inflammation/adhesion at Calot's triangle is an important associated factor for injury. Injuries identified and repaired at the time of the first operation afford good results.     

三种外科疗法治疗老年胆囊结石并发肝外胆管结石病人的疗效比较

目的探讨3种外科疗法治疗老年胆囊结石并发肝外胆管结石病人的疗效与并发症。方法选取我院2016年7月至2019年6月收治的178例胆囊结石并发肝外胆管结石的老年病人作为研究对象,其中63例采用腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LC+LCBDE),61例采用内镜逆行胰胆管造影联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术(ERCP+LC),54例采用胆囊切除术联合胆总管探查术(OC+OCBDE),对3种术式治疗前后病人的肝功能、手术情况及并发症发生情况进行比较分析。结果3组病人术后5 d AST、ALT以及总胆红素等肝功能指标均较术前明显降低(P<0.05);3组肝功能差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。OC+OCBDE组手术时间较LC+LCBDE组和ERCP+LC组明显缩短(P<0.05),OC+OCBDE组术中出血量、肛门排气时间以及住院时间均较LC+LCBDE组和ERCP+LC组明显增加(P<0.05)。LC+LCBDE组、ERCP+LC组和OC+OCBDE组术后并发症的发生率分别为7.94%、21.31%和25.93%,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论3种外科疗法治疗胆囊结石并发肝外胆管结石均可有效清除结石,改善肝功能,其中OC+OCBDE术式在缩短手术时间上具有一定的优势,LC+LCBDE术式发生术后并发症的风险最小。     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; a retrospective 10-year study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate results of laparoscopic cholecystectomies realized in our department and to compare results concerning local and general complications with those reported in the literature. METHODOLOGY: We analyzed retrospectively all the 1255 laparoscopic cholecystectomies realized in our department between January 95 and December 2004. Local and general complications were analyzed. Mean age was 55.6 (21-94) years, sex ratio (F/M) was 3.9. Common bile duct stones were extracted by endoscopic retrograde endoscopy (ERCP) before surgery or by choledochotomy (less than 1% of cases). The operation was performed with 4 trocars, as described by Dubois. RESULTS: Conversion rate was 1.95%. Mean postoperative hospitalization duration was2.7 days. Morbidity was 5.8% with equal repartition between local and general complications. Therevere 2 common bile duct injuries (0.16%). Six patients suffered from residual bile duct stone after cholecystectomy; 5 were treated by ERCP and 1 by choledochotomy. Three patients died (0.24%) after general complications. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecvstectomv is a common operation with potential possible dramatic complications. We think that a radiological study of the biliary tract must be performed before surgery to avoid mistakes during the operation.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: A single-stage minimally invasive procedure would be optimal for management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis. Two alternative strategies are available: management by laparoscopy alone or a combined laparoscopic-endoscopic approach. This study evaluates the results of the latter procedure. METHODS: From June 1993 to September 1997, 1400 patients with symptomatic biliary stone disease were evaluated for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intraoperative cholangiography was performed on the basis of a preoperative suspicion of bile duct stones; bile duct stone treatment was by intraoperative endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy. RESULTS: Intraoperative cholangiography was performed because of a preoperative suspicion of a bile duct abnormality in 141 of 1400 patients (10%) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy because of biliary stone disease. Of those 141 patients, 54 (38.3%) presented with pathologic findings (bile duct stone [52] and papillary stenosis [2]); all 54 underwent intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy. Complete clearance of the ductal stones was achieved in 43 patients (82.7%) by intraoperative sphincterotomy, and in 9 patients by an additional postoperative endoscopic procedure. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was carried out in all cases. There were no conversions to an open operation. Postoperative course in the uncomplicated cases was comparable to that for laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone. The postoperative complication rate was 5.6% and mortality 1.8%. Mean hospital stay was 3.3 days (range 2 to 16). At a mean 38 months follow-up, no complications related to the laparoscopic-endoscopic procedure were observed. CONCLUSION: The intraoperative combined laparoscopic-endoscopic approach seems to be a feasible and effective management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis, saving patients a subsequent invasive procedure.     

Personal experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a surgical team consisting of the same operator and the same first assistant to evaluate a personal learning curve of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODOLOGY: In the 135 patients who underwent the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, operative complications, postoperative complications and operative time were evaluated on the basis of using different camera assistants and the chronological advancement of the same operator and the same first assistant. RESULTS: The average operative time was 120 +/- 54 minutes. The operative time was statistically longer in the first ten cases. The major complication during operation, which was ligation of the common bile duct, occurred in the 7th case. The other operative complications, such as minor bile duct injury or mild bleeding, occurred occasionally in spite of experience or inexperience; the operative complications, however, tended to occur under the same camera assistant. On the other hand, the operative time was not related to the use of different camera assistants. CONCLUSIONS: From the personal learning curve of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, operative time is relatively longer in the early 10 cases. Complications tend to occur under the same camera assistant.     

Prospective audit of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the west of Scotland. West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group.

Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy has rapidly developed in the treatment of gall bladder disease in the absence of controlled clinical trial data its outcome parameters compared with open cholecystectomy remain unclear. A prospective audit of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the west of Scotland over a two year period was carried out to attempt to assess this new procedure. A total of 45 surgeons in 19 hospitals performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy submitted prospective data from September 1990-1992. A total of 2285 cholecystectomies were audited (a completed data collection rate of 99%). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted in 1683 (74%) patients and completed in 1448 patients (median conversion rate to the open procedure 17%). The median operation time in the completed laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients was 100 minutes (range 30-330) and overall hospital stay three days (1-33). There were nine deaths (0.5%) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy although only two were directly attributable to the laparoscopic procedure. In the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group there were 99 complications (5.9%), 53 (3%) of these were major requiring further invasive intervention. Forty patients (2.4%) required early or delayed laparotomy for major complications such as bleeding or bile duct injuries. There were 11 (0.7%) bile duct injuries in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy series, five were noted during the initial procedure and six were recognised later resulting from jaundice or bile leaks. Ductal injuries occurred after a median of 20 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. In conclusion laparoscopic cholecystectomy has rapidly replaced open cholecystectomy in the treatment of gall bladder disease. Although the overall death and complication rate associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy is similar to open cholecystectomy, the bile duct injury rate is higher.     

Biliary tract surgery

The use of the laparoscope in biliary tract surgery continues to play a major role in improving the operative management of patients with biliary diseases. Laparascopic cholecystectomy has been safely performed as a day-case procedure and has lowered the morbidity of cholecystectomy in the setting of acute cholecystitis. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration allows cholecystectomy and the removal of common bile duct stones to be performed during the same procedure, thereby decreasing hospital stay. Several new noninvasive modalities have been recently developed to image the biliary tract. In addition, laparoscopic ultrasound has led to rapid intraoperative imaging of the extrahepatic biliary tree. The long-term results of laparoscopic bile duct injuries have been better defined during the past several years. Finally, the role of surgical resection for gallbladder cancer detected during or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy has recently been evaluated.     

Biliary tract surgery

The use of the laparoscope in biliary tract surgery continues to play a major role in improving the operative management of patients with biliary diseases. Laparascopic cholecystectomy has been safely performed as a day-case procedure and has lowered the morbidity of cholecystectomy in the setting of acute cholecystitis. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration allows cholecystectomy and the removal of common bile duct stones to be performed during the same procedure, thereby decreasing hospital stay. Several new noninvasive modalities have been recently developed to image the biliary tract. In addition, laparoscopic ultrasound has led to rapid intraoperative imaging of the extrahepatic biliary tree. The long-term results of laparoscopic bile duct injuries have been better defined during the past several years. Finally, the role of surgical resection for gallbladder cancer detected during or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy has recently been evaluated.     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术严重手术并发症的预防

目的评价腹腔镜胆囊切除术（ＬＣ）的安全性和有效性，对２８８０例ＬＣ及其并发症的预防加以总结．方法对２８８０例良性胆囊疾病患者行ＬＣ，术前选择性地行ＥＲＣＰ等影像学检查．结果ＬＣ时中转开腹胆囊切除术１２３例（４３％），中转原因多为Ｃａｌｏｔ三角粘连严重，解剖结构不清楚．共发生各种并发症２１例（０７２％），其中胆漏４例，出血３例，膈下积液５例，十二指肠穿孔１例，胆总管残留结石８例，均治愈．无手术死亡病例，也无胆道损伤等严重并发症发生．结论手术者的胆道外科素质，选择性术前ＥＲＣＰ检查，慎重细致的手术操作，是预防胆道损伤等严重手术并发症发生的重要因素．     

The clinical course of common bile duct stone clearance with endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreaticography*

Objectives: Two-stage treatment of common bile duct stones by Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy is well established. In many cases multiple procedures are needed before clearance of the common bile duct is obtained. This study aimed to describe the clinical course from common bile duct stone diagnosis to successful clearance.

Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study from 2011 to 2014 of consecutive patients diagnosed with common bile duct stones undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography at a public university hospital.

Results: In this study 297 patients with common bile duct stones were identified. More than one Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography was performed in 174 (59%) patients and more than two in 51(17%) before clearance. A sphincterotomy was performed in 269 (91%) patients and 189 (64%) had a stent inserted. Bleeding occurred in 17 (6%) requiring injection treatment and post procedure complications occurred in 38 (13%). Subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 180 (61%) patients. Overall, the patients were hospitalized for 11 (8.5) days and the length of treatment from diagnose to stone clearance was 49 (84.5) days. Overweight, pancreatitis at admission, universal anesthesia, and expert level endoscopist inversely determined common bile duct clearance failure.

Conclusions: Common bile duct clearance by Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography requires multiple procedures and complications are frequent leading to prolonged treatment and hospitalization suggesting a limited efficacy.     

Pre-operative endoscopic ultrasonography can optimise the management of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with abnormal liver function tests as the sole risk factor for choledocholithiasis: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative endosonography has been proposed as a cost-effective procedure in the management of patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy having an intermediate risk of common bile duct stones. We prospectively evaluated the impact of pre-operative endosonography on the management of patients facing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with abnormal liver function tests as the sole risk factor for choledocolithiasis. METHODS: Among 587 consecutive patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 47 (8%) patients having one or more abnormal liver function tests but a normal appearance of common bile duct at abdominal ultrasound, underwent pre-operative endosonography. In patients with endosonography-detected common bile duct stones, a pre-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was performed, or an intra-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was scheduled. In all endosonography-negative patients, an intra-operative trans-cystic cholangiography was performed. RESULTS: Endosonography detected common bile duct stones in nine patients (19%) but only in five of them stones were radiologically confirmed (PPV 0.55). Endosonography-detected stones were confirmed in four of four (100%) patients in whom cholangiography was performed within 1 week, but only in one of five (20%) patients in whom radiology was further delayed (P < 0.05). In three of four cases (75%), stones detected at endosonography but not confirmed at X-rays, were smaller than 2.0 mm. Among 38 patients with negative endosonography, common bile duct stones were found in two patients (NPV 0.95), whereas unplanned endoscopic stone extraction was needed only in one patient (NPV 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative endosonography can spare unnecessary pre-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as well as inappropriate scheduling of intra-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with abnormal liver function tests. To maximise the impact of endosonography on the management of these patients, the procedure should be performed immediately before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Selective use of perioperative ERCP in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Management of common bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopic surgery is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety, feasibility, success rate and short-term results of the selective use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODOLOGY: A prospective study comprising 300 consecutive patients with either symptomatic or complicated gallbladder stones was performed between January 1994 and November 1996. Depending on clinical, laboratory and ultrasonographic criteria, 73 patients (24.3%) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy. The procedure was successful in 71 patients (97%) either preoperatively in 62 patients (21%) or postoperatively in 9 patients (3%). RESULTS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was positive in 37 cases (52%), endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction was performed in 35 cases and endoscopic sphincterotomy alone was performed in 2 cases for benign papillary stenosis. The overall predictive value for the presence of common bile duct stone was 52%, the predictive value for patients with jaundice, dilated common bile duct together with elevated liver enzymes was 73.3%. Complications of perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were encountered in 4 patients (5.5%) with no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the combination of perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a useful approach for the management of choledochocholelithiasis.