于世界糖尿病日重谈糖尿病足的诊治与预防

糖尿病足治疗困难，医疗费用高。临床处理时，首先要明确糖尿病足的主要病因因素，如神经性、缺血性或神经缺血性以及是否合并感染，并根据常用的糖尿病足Wagner分级法来判断糖尿病足的严重程度，以采取相应的治疗措施，如神经性溃疡应减轻局部压力和纠正局部的畸形，周围血管病变则采用内科治疗和介入或外科治疗，感染的局部处理和全身用药等。糖尿病足的防治必须强调多学科合作和综合治疗，预防的重点在于开展糖尿病足危险因素筛查并给予纠正。     

The Prevalence of Foot Ulceration and its Correlates in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: a Population-based Study

The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and foot ulceration in Type 2 diabetic patients in the community were determined in a community-based study. Eight hundred and eleven subjects (404 male, 407 female, mean age 65.4 (range 34–90) years, diabetes duration 7.4 (0–50) years) from 37 general practices in three UK cities were studied. Neuropathy was diagnosed clinically using modified neuropathy disability scores which were ascertained using structured interviews and clinical examinations by one observer in each city. Peripheral vascular disease was diagnosed if a history of revascularization was present or ≥ 2 foot pulses were absent. History of current or previous foot ulceration was recorded. The prevalence of neuropathy was 41.6% (95% confidence limits 38.3–44.9%) and the prevalence of PVD, 11% (9.1–13.7%). Forty-eight percent of neuropathic patients reported significant neuropathic symptoms. Forty-three patients (5.3% (3.8-6.8%)) had current or past foot ulcers; 20 of these were pure neuropathic ulcers, 13 neuroischaemic, 5 pure vascular, and 5 were unclassified. Multiple logistic regression showed history of amputation, neuropathy disability score, and peripheral vascular disease to be significantly associated with foot ulceration after adjusting for age and diabetes duration. A substantial proportion of Type 2 diabetic patients, often elderly patients who do not attend hospitals, suffered from peripheral neuropathy and peripheral vascular disease. These patients are at risk of foot ulceration and may benefit from preventive footcare.     

Reducing the incidence of foot ulceration and amputation in diabetes

Diabetes is a common disease that is associated with numerous complications, including foot ulceration and amputation. In diabetic patients, the incidence of foot ulcers ranges from 1.0% to 4.1%, and the incidence of lower-extremity amputations ranges from 2.1 to 13.7 per 1000. Risk factors for developing foot ulcers and subsequent amputation include neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and trauma. To reduce these complications, several preventive strategies have been devised, from reducing risk factors to improving treatment and management.     

Complexity of factors related to outcome of neuropathic and neuroischaemic/ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers: a cohort study

Aims/hypothesis  We sought to identify factors related to short-term outcome of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes treated in a multidisciplinary system until healing was achieved. Methods  Consecutively presenting patients with diabetes and worst foot ulcer (Wagner grade 1–5, below ankle) (n = 2,511) were prospectively followed and treated according to a standardised protocol until healing was achieved or until death. The number of patients lost to dropout was 31. The characteristics of the remaining 2,480 patients were: 1,465 men, age 68 ± 15 years (range 18–96), type 1 diabetes 18%, type 2 diabetes 82% and insulin-treated 62%. Results  The healing rate without major amputation in surviving patients was 90.6% (n = 1,867). Sixty-five per cent (n = 1,617) were healed primarily, 9% (n = 250) after minor amputation and 8% after major amputation; 17% (n = 420) died unhealed. Out of 2,060 surviving patients, 1,007 were neuroischaemic (48.8%). In a multiple regression analysis, primary healing was related to co-morbidity, duration of diabetes, extent of peripheral vascular disease and type of ulcer. In neuropathic ulcers, deep foot infection, site of ulcer and co-morbidity were related to amputation. Amputation in neuroischaemic ulcers was related to co-morbidity, peripheral vascular disease and type of ulcer. Age, sex, duration of diabetes, neuropathy, deformity and duration of ulcer or site of ulcer did not have an evident influence on probability of amputation. Conclusions/interpretation  Patients with diabetic foot ulcer suffer from multi-organ disease. Factors related to outcome are correspondingly complex.     

Medical risk factors in diabetic patients with foot ulcers and severe peripheral vascular disease and their influence on outcome.

The association between medical risk factors and the outcome of foot ulcers was evaluated in 208 consecutive diabetic patients with severe peripheral vascular disease (systolic toe blood pressure < or = 45 mm Hg). All patients were treated and followed by the same foot care team. Eighty patients healed primarily, 83 healed after a minor or major amputation, and 45 died. The systolic toe blood pressure was higher among primary healed (30 +/- 13 mm Hg) compared with amputated (22 +/- 15 mm Hg; p < 0.001) and deceased patients (20 +/- 14 mm Hg; p < 0.001). The patients were comparable regarding age, sex, and diabetes and wound duration. Only 41 (19%) patients had intermitten claudication, whereas 153 (77%) lacked palapble pedal pulses, 36% of whom healed primarily. Rest pain occurred in 72 (33%) patients, 38 (47%) of whom had an amputation and 18 (25%) who healed primarily (p < 0.01). Peripheral edema and proteinuria were more common among patients who healed after amputation compared with those who healed primarily (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Signs of sensory neuropathy were found in 158 (77%) patients. There were no differences concerning cardiovascular disease, smoking habits, or short-term metabolic control between patients who healed primarily or after an amputation. In conclusion, diabetic patients with foot ulcers and severe peripheral vascular disease with low systolic toe blood pressure were not excluded from the possibility of primary healing. The most important risk factors for amputation were a systolic toe pressure of less than 30 mm Hg, peripheral edema, rest pain, and proteinuria.     

Association of diabetic foot ulcers with chronic vascular diabetic complications in patients with type 2 diabetes

ContextDiabetes mellitus is a common disease which is prevalent globally, presenting with chronic complications and constitutes a major risk to the patient. Diabetic foot ulcers are the single biggest risk factor for non-traumatic lower limb amputations in persons with diabetes. We aimed to screen for the chronic vascular diabetic complications in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and to assess the association of diabetic foot ulcers with these complications in the study group.Subjects and methodsThis cross-sectional study included 180 type 2 diabetic patients (aged 30–70 years) with diabetic foot ulcers who attended the Outpatient Clinic of Diabetes in Alexandria Main University Hospital. Full diabetic foot examination was done to all study subjects. DFUs were assessed using University of Texas Diabetic Wound Classification System. HbA1c, LDL-C, serum creatinine, and urinary albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) were measured for all study subjects. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using CKD-EPI equation. Fundus examination was done for all study subjects.ResultsThe prevalence of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) was 86.1% and 90% respectively among the study group. 86.7% of patients had neuropathic DFUs, 11.1% of them had ischemic DFUs and 2.2% had neuro-ischemic DFUs. Regarding diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) as risk factors for developing DFU, the prevalence of both of them respectively was 82% and 20% among the study group. There was statistically significant association between both DKD, DR and peripheral neuropathy. There was also statistically significant association between both DKD, DR and peripheral arterial disease (PAD).ConclusionChronic vascular diabetic complications are common among type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic foot ulcers. There is statistically significant association between these complications and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD).     

Patients’ clinical charecteristics and predictors for diabetic foot amputation

IntroductionMedical and surgical treatment options are available for patients with diabetic foot ulcers. In more severe cases, amputation decisions are determined by patient comorbidities, performance, imaging studies, and clinical examination results. However, an objective indicator that predicts how this amputation process will end has not yet been clarified. This study identifiies clinical characteristics that can be predictors of the need for diabetic foot amputation among patients.MethodsIn this retrospective observational study, a total of 400 patients with type 2 diabetes who were over the age of 18 and possessed diabetic foot ulcers were examined. The clinical, radiological, and scintigraphic profiles of these patients including age, gender, duration of diabetes, smoking history, previous diabetic foot amputation, presence of hypertension (HT), coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral artery disease (PAD), cerebrovascular disease, cardiovascular disease, retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy were analyzed.ResultsOf the 400 patients with diabetic foot ulcers, 143 (35.75%) underwent foot amputation. Moreover, the frequency of proteinuria in amputees was significantly higher than in non-amputees (p < 0,05). Amputees also exhibited significantly longer smoking histories (p < 0,001), and the frequency of reamputation was significantly higher in those who possesed histories of previous amputation (p = 0.038). After multivariate analysis PAD presence and previous diabetic ulcer history were the significant factors to determine the amputation decision.ConclusionThe following patient characteristics were determined as being effective for predicting the need for amputation: male sex, CAD, PAD, HT, proteinuria, ulcers with Wagner Stages 4–5, smoking histories, previous diabetic ulcer histories, and previous amputation histories. The specificity of the model with these variables was determined as 86% in the patients who did not need amputation. Significant determinants were peripheral artery disease presence and diabetic foot ulcer history. Still, further and more extensive research with higher numbers of patients is necessary for determining more precisely the need for amputation.     

Saving the diabetic foot with special reference to the patient with chronic renal failure

The chronic renal failure patient with diabetes has a lower limb amputation rate 10 times greater than the diabetic population at large. In studies of causal pathways leading to non-traumatic related lower extremity amputation, foot ulcers preceded approximately 84% of the amputations. Even though foot ulcers are more likely to develop in patients with diabetic nephropathy, they are no less likely to heal than are those in diabetic patients with normal renal function. Consequently, attempts to save the diabetic foot even in this high-risk population are justified. The pathogenesis of foot ulceration in the chronic renal failure patient with diabetes is primarily due to peripheral neuropathy. Loss of protective sensation due to sensory neuropathy combined with motor and autonomic neuropathy and macrovascular compromise result in increased risk for foot complications. Evaluation of the foot includes a selective history and a focused examination of skin integrity, presence of sensory neuropathy or vascular insufficiency, and biomechanical and footwear inspection. Effective treatment of diabetic foot complications include appropriate antibiotics (when indicated), meticulous wound care, off-loading, vascular surgery (when indicated), and selective/elective or prophylactic nonvascular surgery. Failure to heal an ulcer can often be traced to common pitfalls, which include: A "cavalier" attitude. W.N.L. exam (We Never Looked). Inadequate off-loading. Failure to establish depth of ulcer and miss "probe to bone." Non-healing means unrelieved pressure and/or no blood. Failure to correct edema. The multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic model provides an ideal setting for early intervention, treatment, and assistance with preventive strategies.     

Change in amputation predictors in diabetic foot disease: effect of multidisciplinary approach

Diabetic foot disease causes important morbidity in diabetic population, and amputation due to diabetic foot disease occurs more often than in general population. We have been evaluating patients with diabetic foot disease in a multidisciplinary approach since year 2000. In the current study, we sought to investigate the change in amputation rate and its predictors in diabetic foot with a multidisciplinary team approach. Seventy-four patients (52 male, 22 female) hospitalised between January 2002 and December 2007 were retrospectively analysed. Sixteen out of 74 have undergone amputation. We found overall amputation rate as 21.6%, which is lower than previously reported from our institution (36.7 and 39.4%, respectively). Major amputations (syme, below-knee, above-knee) were applied to 11 patients (14.9%). A logistic regression model including osteomyelitis, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, gangrene and age revealed that gangrene is now the only significant predictor for amputation. Our observations confirm that amputation rate has declined after implementation of a multidisciplinary team work, and risk factors apart from presence of gangrene are no longer amputation predictors in our centre.     

Factors Associated with Diabetic Foot Ulceration in Thailand: a Case-control Study

A case-control study was conducted to determine factors involved in foot ulceration in Thai non-insulin-dependent (Type 2) diabetic patients. Fifty-five patients with foot ulcers (42 females and 13 males) and 110 patients without foot ulcers (83 females and 27 males) were evaluated for 26 factors possibly associated with foot ulceration. The results showed that diabetic patients with foot ulcers had significantly lower diabetic knowledge and foot-care practice scores; poorer glycaemic control, renal function, and visual function, and higher prevalence of retinopathy and peripheral neuropathy than diabetic patients without foot ulcers, whereas there were no differences in peripheral vascular status between both groups, each having a low prevalence. Multiple logistic regression analyses indicated that the risk of developing foot ulcers was associated with only three factors which were peripheral nerve status as determined by somatosensory evoked potentials (OR = 1.67; 95% CI 0.31 −8.97), visual acuity (OR = 0.223 per unit decrease in decimal visual acuity; 95 % CI = 0.005, 0.39) and fasting plasma glucose level (OR = 1.01 per mmol l⁻¹ increase; 95 % CI = 1.00, 1.02). We conclude that peripheral neuropathy, visual impairment, and poor glycaemic control, but not peripheral vascular insufficiency, are the major independent risk factors associated with foot ulceration in Thai diabetic patients. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Diabetic foot disease in the elderly

Elderly diabetic patients are particularly burdened by foot disease. The main causes for foot disease are peripheral neuropathy, foot deformities and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Other risk factors include poor vision, gait abnormalities, reduced mobility an medical co-morbidities. The risk of major amputations increases with age, along with the increased prevalence of these risk factors. Th true risk of amputation and other burdens of foot disease in the elderly are likely underestimated by current epidemiological data. Th prevalence of neuropathy, foot deformities and PAD as well as the risk of amputation all increase with age even in non-diabetic patients. The principles of prevention and management of diabetic foot disease may also apply to large segments of the elderly non-diabetic population. Foot ulcer prevention relies on the identification of high risk patients and avoidance of triggering events, such as ill-fitting shoes, walking barefoot or poor self-care. PAD is a major cause of amputation and should be prevented by lifelong attention to glycaemic control, treatment of hypertension and dyslipidemia, and avoidance of smoking. The treatment of foot ulcers relies on pressure relief (off-loading), wound debridement, and treatment of infection and ischemia. It requires an individualized approach considering the patient's co-morbidities and functional status. Off-loading remains essential, but devices such as total contact casts or crutches can only rarely be implemented. However, providing adapted standard foot-wear and insisting on its consistent use even at home is often effective. The benefits of aggressive vascular or orthopaedic surgery should be weighed against the risks of prolonged hospitalisation and resulting functional decline. Greater attention to prevention and individualized care are needed to reduce the burden of diabetic foot disease in the elderly.     

Relationship between peripheral vascular disease and high plantar pressures in diabetic neuro-ischaemic patients

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that high foot pressure in diabetic patients plays a crucial role in plantar ulcer development. The purpose of the study is to analyze the relationship between foot arterial pressures and plantar pressures in diabetic patients with both peripheral neuropathy vascular disease. METHODS: We have evaluated the relationship between foot arterial pressures and plantar pressure parameters (Peak Plantar Pressure, Foot-Floor Contact and Plantar Pressure Integral) in eleven diabetic patients with both peripheral neuropathy and peripheral vascular disease. Peripheral neuropathy was defined as a tuning fork score<4/8 measured at the great toe and internal malleolus with a Tuning fork (Rydel-Seiffer 128 Hz), the absence of both patellar and ankle reflexes and with a temperature discrimination more than +5 degrees C (Thermocross). The peripheral vascular disease (PVD) was evaluated by Doppler technique. Peak Plantar Pressure (PPP) and Foot-Floor Contact (FFC) were measured by Force-Sensing Resistive (FSR 174) sensors under the 1st, 3rd and 5th metatarsal heads as well as under the heel and big toe of both feet. The Plantar Pressure Integral (PPI) was defined by the integral of the pressure over the time. RESULTS: We have found significant relationship between plantar pressure parameters (PPP, FFC, and PPI) under the first metatarsal heads and Doppler arterial pressures of both tibial posterior and dorsalis pedis artery. However, there was no relationship between Doppler arterial pressures and plantar pressure parameters (PPP, FFC, PPI) under 3rd and 5th metatarsal heads or under both the heel and the big toe. CONCLUSION: According to our results, the peripheral vascular disease could contribute to the elevation of plantar pressures and to the prolonged duration of foot floor contact at each step in diabetic patients with both peripheral neuropathy and peripheral vascular disease. In such patients, severe ischaemia could lead to an increased risk of foot ulceration and consecutive lower extremity amputation.     

Magnitude of foot problems in diabetes in the developing world: a study of 1044 patients

Aim To gain insight into the prevalence of peripheral neuropathy, foot care practices, foot at risk and foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus at a tertiary care centre. Methods A prospective case study involving 1044 patients with diabetes mellitus attending the diabetes clinic of a tertiary care centre in north India from January 2007 to May 2008. All subjects underwent a detailed clinical assessment including vibration perception threshold (VPT) and ankle brachial pressure index (ABI), along with metabolic parameters, and were categorized into ulcer, foot at risk and patients with no risk factors. Foot care practices were assessed with a questionnaire. Peripheral neuropathy was defined as VPT score ≥ 25 V. Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) was defined as ABI < 0.9. One hundred and forty‐nine patients with foot at risk were followed up for 9.0 ± 2.3 months (range 5–13 months). Results The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy was 34.9% and of PVD 12.6%. Two thirds of the patients were at risk for foot ulceration; 9% had an ulcer and 20.2% of them required amputation. Correct foot care practices were followed by 214 (20.5%) subjects of the whole study population and by only 135 (19.3%) of the patients with foot at risk. Improvement in glycaemic control in the patients on follow‐up was associated with improvement or stabilization of VPT score. Five (3.4%) patients developed new ulcers on follow‐up. Conclusion The high prevalence of neuropathy and PVD, coexisting with poor adherence to foot care practices predisposes to foot problems in people with diabetes in our study population.     

Frequency of risk factors for foot ulceration in individuals with chronic kidney disease

Background: Although chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been associated with foot ulceration, the pathological pathway involved remains unclear. This pilot study was designed to investigate the risk factors for foot ulceration in individuals with CKD who do not have diabetes. The aims of this study were to establish the risk status for foot ulceration in individuals with CKD and to identify the particular foot ulcer risk factors most prevalent in this group. Methods: One hundred outpatients were recruited from a metropolitan hospital and allocated into one of four groups: (i) control: neither diabetes nor CKD, (ii) diabetes alone, (iii) coexisting CKD and diabetes and (iv) CKD alone. All participants were assessed for past/current foot ulcers, peripheral neuropathy, vascular insufficiency, structural deformity and skin pathology. Comparisons were made between the groups regarding the prevalence of these factors. Results: Participants with CKD who did not have diabetes displayed no significant differences in risk factor presentation from those with diabetes alone. Of the participants with CKD and no diabetes, 36% had peripheral neuropathy, 20% had vascular insufficiency and 24% had the copresentation of peripheral neuropathy and structural deformity. Overall, participants with both CKD and diabetes had the highest presentation of past/current foot ulcers, peripheral neuropathy and vascular insufficiency, all significantly more frequent in this group than in controls (P < 0.05). Eight of the total 10 participants found to have a past/current foot ulcer were in end‐stage kidney failure. Conclusion: Individuals with CKD frequently display risk factors for foot ulceration. Risk factors are more prevalent in individuals who also have diabetes and foot ulcers become more frequent with progression to end‐stage kidney failure. Risk assessment and patient awareness strategies should therefore be extended to include all patients with CKD so as to reduce future foot ulcer development.     

The association between baseline characteristics and the outcome of foot lesions in a UK population with diabetes.

AIMS: To explore the relationships between time to healing of diabetic foot ulcers and baseline characteristics of both patients and their ulcers. METHODS: All patients were included who were referred to a specialist clinic over a 4-year period. Age, gender, type and duration of diabetes, ulcer site, ulcer duration and baseline characteristics were recorded. Postcode was used to derive an index of social deprivation. Patients were followed up to 1 year. The primary outcome measure was time to healing. Those who died or had an ulcer-related amputation were censored at the time of death or amputation and classified as unhealed. RESULTS: Mean age of 449 participants (63.7% male) was 66.7 years; 42.7% had evidence of peripheral arterial disease, and 80% had peripheral neuropathy. Median ulcer duration at presentation was 29 days; 60.5% ulcers had an area of < 1 cm(2) and 68.3% of all ulcers healed without amputation during the follow-up period. Univariate analysis revealed dose-response relationships between time to healing and increasing duration of diabetes, increasing ulcer area, ulcer site and peripheral arterial disease. No associations were found with age, gender, diabetes type, deprivation index, peripheral neuropathy or infection. The relationship between healing time and ulcer area, peripheral arterial disease and diabetes duration remained significant on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The dominant factors influencing healing are cross-sectional area at presentation and the degree of peripheral arterial disease. Further work is needed to define how those at greatest risk may be identified and best managed.     

Implementation of diabetic foot ulcer classification system for research purposes to predict lower extremity amputation

BACKROUND:

Patients with diabetic foot ulcers are at a high risk of having both minor or major lower extremity amputations.

AIM:

To identify the extent of risk factors for major and minor amputations in patients with diabetic foot ulcers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

This prospective study was conducted from 2003 to 2005. Using the guidelines for wound classification developed by the International Consensus of the Diabetic Foot, patients were assessed for ischemia, neuropathy, linear measurement of wound diameters, depth of wound, and infection. In addition, end stage renal failure was added as a criterion to assess the association of all these criteria with both toe and lower extremity amputation.

RESULTS:

2,321 patients were studied and their mean age was 55 ± 12 years. Most (83.5%) of the patients presented with foot ulcers (n = 1394). Plantar ulcers were the most common (42.6%) followed by ulcers of the big toe (39%). Some (28.5%) of the patients had different types of amputations: 10% had major lower extreme amputation (MLEA) with 8.7% amputations being below the knee and minor (toe) amputations accounting for 18.5%. The most commonly amputated (9.9%) toe was the first toe.

CONCLUSION:

The guidelines for wound classification proposed by the International Consensus of the Diabetic Foot are reliable predictive factors and can determine the outcome of diabetic foot management. Significant factors associated with MLEA were ischemia, neuropathy, and end-stage renal disease and those associated with toe amputation were neuropathy, depth of wound, and grade of infection.     

Autonomic neuropathy and transcutaneous oxymetry in diabetic lower extremities

Summary Transcutaneous oxygen tension is a useful method with which to assess the functional status of skin blood flow. The reduced values observed in diabetic patients have been interpreted as a consequence of peripheral vascular disease. However, diabetic patients show lower transcutaneous oxygen tension values than control subjects with equivalent degrees of peripheral vascular disease, suggesting that additional factors are involved. Since the autonomic nervous system influences peripheral circulation, we studied the relationship between autonomic neuropathy and foot transcutaneous oxymetry in non-insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDDM) patients without peripheral vascular disease. The following age-matched patients were selected and evaluated: control subjects, C, (n=20), NIDDM patients without autonomic neuropathy, D, (n=16) and with autonomic neuropathy, DN, (n=20). All diabetic patients showed lower transcutaneous oxygen tension values than control subjects, while no differences were observed between the diabetic patients with and without autonomic neuropathy. In addition the saturation index that increases in the presence of autonomic neuropathy does not correlate with foot TcPO₂. In conclusion autonomic neuropathy does not influence foot TcPO₂ and therefore it is unlikely that it contributes to development of foot lesions during induction of foot skin ischaemia.Abbreviations NIDDM Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus - TcPO₂ transcutaneous oxymetry - A-V arterio-venous shunts - PVD peripheral vascular disease - HbA_1c glycated haemoglobin - SI saturation index     

The importance of peripheral pulses, peripheral oedema and local pain for the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers

In a prospective study, peripheral pulses, claudication, peripheral oedema, and rest pain were evaluated in 314 sequentially presenting diabetic patients with foot ulcers. In the ulcerated limb pedal pulses were found to be present in 44% of the patients, peripheral oedema in 38%, and rest pain in 19%. Twelve per cent had claudication. Presence of pedal pulses was more common in patients whose ulcers underwent primary healing (56%) than in those who healed after amputation (23%) or died (25%, p less than 0.001). Eighty per cent of the patients with pedal pulses present underwent primary healing. However, 49% of patients with absence of pedal pulses also underwent primary healing and 12 patients developed gangrene despite presence of pedal pulses. Peripheral oedema was more common in patients who required amputation (58%) or died (55%) than in patients with primary healing (26%, p less than 0.001). A tentative predisposing factor was identified in 95% of the patients, the most common factors being neuropathy, congestive heart failure, and previous deep venous thrombosis. Rest pain was more common in patients who required amputation (48%) or died (23%) than in those with primary healing (7%; p less than 0.001). Only 50% of patients with gangrene had rest pain and of these patients, only one underwent primary healing. The presence of pedal pulses, oedema, and rest pain give valuable but imperfect information on the possible primary healing of foot ulcers in diabetic patients.     

Venous oxygenation in the diabetic neuropathic foot: Evidence of arteriovenous shunting?

Summary Venous PO₂ was measured in the feet and hands of four subject groups: 14 diabetics with neuropathy and foot ulceration; 12 diabetics with neuropathy but no ulceration; 11 diabetics with no evidence of microvascular complications; and 10 nondiabetic controls. Neither patients nor controls had clinical evidence of peripheral vascular disease. The mean venous PO₂ in the feet of subjects with neuropathy and foot ulceration was significantly higher than in controls or the other two diabetic groups. Venous PO₂ in the feet of the subjects with ulcers was also significantly higher than in their hands or in the hands of the other groups. These results provide further evidence of abnormal blood flow in the diabetic neuropathic foot and are compatible with arteriovenous shunting.     

High Prevalence of Diabetes in Chronic Leg Ulcer Patients: a Cross-sectional Population Study

In a cross-sectional survey, designed to detect all patients with current chronic leg ulcers, 27% of the patients had diabetes mellitus. The outcome for the 104 examined diabetic patients has been evaluated and compared with the 278 nondiabetic patients. The purpose was to establish the prevalence of leg ulcers among diabetic patients and to assess potential causes. The point prevalence was calculated by extrapolating the leg ulcer frequency to the total diabetic population in the studied area. The point prevalence for active leg ulcers (including foot ulcers) in diabetic patients was 3.5% (95% CI 2.8–4.2). Ulcers above the malleoli were almost as common as foot ulcers. Peripheral vascular disease was present in 67% of all ulcerated legs in patients with diabetes compared to 42% in nondiabetic patients (p < 0.001). In 72% of foot ulcers in diabetic patients arterial impairment was judged to be a contributing aetiological factor and in nondiabetic patients 45% (p < 0.001). Ulcers solely attributed to possible neuropathy were less common (15%). Ulcers with multifactorial causes were common above the malleoli. This survey has given the size of the problem and indicates macroangiopathy to be the dominating factor responsible for slow or nonhealing ulcers in diabetic patients. Objective assessment of arterial circulation is mandatory and signs of arterial impairment require consultation with a vascular surgeon.