The latent inhibition model dissociates between clozapine, haloperidol, and ritanserin.

Latent inhibition (LI), i.e., retarded conditioning to a stimulus following its nonreinforced preexposure, is impaired in some subsets of schizophrenia patients and in amphetamine-treated rats. Typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs (APD's) potentiate LI, but to date the model has not dissociated between them. This study demonstrates such a dissociation using haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg), clozapine (5 mg/kg), and ritanserin (0.6 mg/kg) administered in preexposure and/or conditioning. Under conditions which did not yield LI in vehicle controls (40 preexposures and five conditioning trials), both haloperidol and clozapine, but not ritanserin, led to LI when administered in conditioning. Under conditions which led to LI in vehicle controls (40 preexposures and two conditioning trials), clozapine and ritanserin, but not haloperidol, abolished LI when administered in preexposure. It is suggested that LI potentiation via conditioning detects the "typical" action of APD's whereas LI disruption via preexposure detects the "atypical" action of APD's.     

The sigma ligand BMY-14802 as a potential antipsychotic: evidence from the latent inhibition model in rats

Latent inhibition (LI) is a measure of retarded conditioning to a previously-presented nonreinforced stimulus, that is impaired in schizophrenic patients and in rats treated with amphetamine. Neuroleptic drugs are known to produce two effects in this test paradigm: to antagonise amphetamine-induced disruption of LI, and to enhance LI when administered on their own. The present experiments tested the effects on LI of a potential antipsychotic, sigma ligand BMY-14802. The experiments used a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure in rats licking for water, consisting of three stages: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus (a tone) was repeatedly presented without being followed by reinforcement; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with reinforcement (a foot shock); and test, in which LI was indexed by animals' degree of suppression of licking during tone presentation. In Experiment 1, 20 tone preexposures and two conditioning trials were given and the effects of 5, 15, and 30mg/kg BMY-14802 were assessed. Experiment 2 tested the effects of 15 and 30mg/kg on LI using ten preexposures and two conditioning trials. Experiment 3 investigated the effects of 15 and 30mg/kg on LI using 40 preexposures and extended conditioning consisting of five tone-shock pairings. Experiments 4 and 5 investigated antagonism of amphetamine-induced disruption of LI by 15 and 30mg/kg BMY-14802, respectively. BMY-14802 was found to antagonise amphetamine-induced disruption of LI and enhance LI when low numbers of preexposures and two conditioning trials were given, but not following extended conditioning. These results provide partial support for the suggestion that BMY-14802 may possess antipsychotic properties.     

Antagonism of amphetamine-induced disruption of latent inhibition in rats by haloperidol and ondansetron: Implications for a possible antipsychotic action of ondansetron

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioural phenomenon whereby preexposure to a stimulus without reinforcement interferes with the formation of subsequent associations to that stimulus. Using preexposure to a tone stimulus which subsequently serves as a conditioned stimulus for suppression of licking, we have confirmed that LI is disrupted by a low dose of amphetamine. Haloperidol was able to prevent this effect of amphetamine. Ondansetron, a selective and potent 5HT₃ receptor antagonist, was also shown to be effective at blocking the amphetamine-induced disruption of LI at a dose of 0.01 mg/kg, but not at 0.1 mg/kg. In addition, it was demonstrated that ondansetron could enhance LI; using only ten preexposures, no LI was obtained in the saline group, but was apparent in animals given ondansetron, an effect which has been previously shown with haloperidol. Haloperidol, at the higher dose used, reduced suppression of licking, however, ondansetron at the effective dose had no such effect. It is concluded that ondansetron is able to attenuate increases in dopamine activity, produced pharmacologically with amphetamine without affecting baseline dopamine activity. The implications of these findings for a possible antipsychotic action of ondansetron are discussed.     

Disruption of latent inhibition induced by ovariectomy can be reversed by estradiol and clozapine as well as by co-administration of haloperidol with estradiol but not by haloperidol alone

Introduction

Epidemiological and clinical life cycle studies have indicated that the more favorable illness course and the better response to antipsychotic drugs (APDs) in women with schizophrenia correlate with high levels of estrogen, whereas increased vulnerability to exacerbation and relapse and reduced sensitivity to treatment are associated with low estrogen levels. Accordingly, the estrogen hypothesis of schizophrenia proposes that estrogen has a neuroprotective effect in women vulnerable to schizophrenia.

Materials and methods

Latent inhibition (LI), the capacity to ignore stimuli that received nonreinforced preexposure prior to conditioning, is disrupted in acute schizophrenia patients and in rats and humans treated with the psychosis inducing drug amphetamine. Disruption of LI is reversible by typical and atypical APDs. The present study tested whether low levels of estrogen induced by ovariectomy (OVX) would lead to disruption of LI in female rats and whether such disruption would be normalized by estrogen replacement treatment and/or APDs.

Results

Results showed that OVX led to LI disruption, which was reversed by 17β-estradiol (150 μg/kg) and the atypical APD clozapine (5 mg/kg), but not by the typical APD haloperidol (0.1, 0.2, 0.3 mg/kg). Haloperidol regained efficacy when administered with 17β-estradiol (50 μg/kg).

Discussion

These results provide the first demonstration in rats that low levels of hormones can induce a pro-psychotic state that is resistant to at least typical antipsychotic treatment. This constellation may mimic states seen in schizophrenic women during periods associated with low levels of hormones such as the menopause.     

Scopolamine induces disruption of latent inhibition which is prevented by antipsychotic drugs and an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor.

The fact that muscarinic antagonists may evoke a psychotic state ('antimuscarinic psychosis'), along with findings of cholinergic alterations in schizophrenia, have kindled an interest in the involvement of the cholinergic system in this disorder. Latent inhibition (LI) is a cross-species phenomenon manifested as a poorer conditioning of a stimulus seen when the stage of conditioning is preceded by a stage of repeated nonreinforced pre-exposure to that stimulus, and is considered to index the capacity to ignore irrelevant stimuli. Amphetamine-induced LI disruption and its reversal by antipsychotic drugs (APDs) is a well-established model of positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Here, we tested whether the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine would disrupt LI and whether such disruption would be reversed by APDs and by the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine. The results showed that scopolamine at doses of 0.15 and 0.5 mg/kg disrupted LI, and that this effect was due to the action of the drug in the pre-exposure stage, suggesting a role of muscarinic transmission in attentional processes underlying LI. Both the typical and the atypical APDs, haloperidol and clozapine, reversed scopolamine-induced LI disruption when given in conditioning or in both stages, but not in pre-exposure, indicating that the mechanism of antipsychotic action in this model is independent of the mechanism of action of the propsychotic drug. Scopolamine-induced LI disruption was reversed by physostigmine (0.05 and 0.15 mg/kg), which was ineffective in reversing amphetamine-induced LI disruption, pointing to distinct mechanisms underlying LI disruption by these two propsychotic drugs. The latter was further supported by the finding that unlike amphetamine, the LI-disrupting doses of scopolamine did not affect activity levels. We propose scopolamine-induced LI disruption as a model of cholinergic-related positive symptoms in schizophrenia.     

Disruption of latent inhibition by acute administration of low doses of amphetamine

In the latent inhibition (LI) paradigm, nonreinforced preexposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. Three experiments investigated the effects of acute amphetamine administration on LI in rats. Experiments 1 and 3 used a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure and Experiment 2 used two-way active avoidance procedure. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that, in both the CER and avoidance procedures, 1.5 mg/kg dl-amphetamine administered either in the preexposure or the conditioning stage alone did not disrupt LI. In contrast, amphetamine administered in both of the stages abolished LI. Experiment 3 showed that the abolition of LI was obtained when the preexposure and conditioning were given 24 hr apart but not when the two stages were given in one session.     

The "two-headed" latent inhibition model of schizophrenia: modeling positive and negative symptoms and their treatment

Rationale Latent inhibition (LI), namely, poorer performance on a learning task involving a previously pre-exposed non-reinforced stimulus, is disrupted in the rat by the dopamine (DA) releaser amphetamine which produces and exacerbates psychotic (positive) symptoms, and this is reversed by treatment with typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs) which on their own potentiate LI. These phenomena are paralleled by disrupted LI in normal amphetamine-treated humans, in high schizotypal humans, and in schizophrenia patients in the acute stages of the disorder, as well as by potentiated LI in normal humans treated with APDs. Consequently, disrupted LI is considered to provide an animal model of positive symptoms of schizophrenia with face, construct and predictive validity. Objectives To review most of the rodent data on the neural substrates of LI as well as on the effects of APDs on this phenomenon with an attempt to interpret and integrate these data within the framework of the switching model of LI; to show that there are two distinct LI models, disrupted and abnormally persistent LI; to relate these findings to the clinical condition. Results The nucleus accumbens (NAC) and its DA innervation form a crucial component of the neural circuitry of LI, and are involved at the conditioning stage. There is a clear functional differentiation between the NAC shell and core subregions whereby damage to the shell disrupts LI and damage to the core renders LI abnormally persistent under conditions that disrupt LI in normal rats. The effects of shell and core lesions parallel those produced by lesions to the major sources of input to the NAC: entorhinal cortex lesion, like shell lesion, disrupts LI, whereas hippocampal lesion, like core lesion, produces persistent LI with changes in context, and basolateral amygdala (BLA) lesion, like core lesion, produces persistent LI with extended conditioning. Systemically induced blockade of glutamatergic as well as DA transmission produce persistent LI via effects exerted at the conditioning stage, whereas enhancement of DA transmission disrupts LI via effects at the conditioning stage. Serotonergic manipulations can disrupt or potentiate LI via effects at the pre-exposure stage. Both typical and atypical APDs potentiate LI via effects at conditioning whereas atypical APDs in addition disrupt LI via effects at pre-exposure. Schizophrenia patients can exhibit disrupted or normal LI as a function of the state of the disorder (acute versus chronic), as well as persistent LI. Conclusions Different drug and lesion manipulations produce two poles of abnormality in LI, namely, disrupted LI under conditions which lead to LI in normal rats, and abnormally persistent LI under conditions which disrupt it in normal rats. Disrupted and persistent LI are differentially responsive to APDs, with the former reversed by both typical and atypical APDs and the latter selectively reversed by atypical APDs. It is suggested that this "two-headed LI model" mimics two extremes of deficient cognitive switching seen in schizophrenia, excessive and retarded switching between associations, mediated by dysfunction of different brain circuitries, and can serve to model positive symptoms of schizophrenia and typical antipsychotic action, as well as negative symptoms of schizophrenia and atypical antipsychotic action.     

Immune activation during pregnancy in rats leads to a postpubertal emergence of disrupted latent inhibition, dopaminergic hyperfunction, and altered limbic morphology in the offspring: a novel neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia.

Prenatal exposure to infection is associated with increased liability to schizophrenia, and it is believed that such an association is mediated by the maternal immune response, in particular, the proinflammatory cytokines released by the maternal immune system, which may disrupt fetal brain development. Impaired capacity to ignore irrelevant stimuli is one of the central deficits in schizophrenia, and is manifested, among others, in loss of latent inhibition (LI), a phenomenon whereby repeated inconsequential pre-exposure to a stimulus impairs its subsequent capacity to signal significant consequences. We tested the effects of prenatal immune activation induced by peripheral administration of the synthetic cytokine releaser polyriboinosinic-polyribocytidilic acid (poly I : C) to pregnant dams, on LI in juvenile and adult offspring. Consistent with the characteristic maturational delay of schizophrenia, prenatal immune activation did not affect LI in the juvenile offspring, but led to LI disruption in adulthood. Both haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) and clozapine (5 mg/kg) reinstated LI in the adult offspring. In addition, prenatal immune activation led to a postpubertal emergence of increased sensitivity to the locomotor-stimulating effects of amphetamine and increased in vitro striatal dopamine release, as well as to morphological alterations in the hippocampus and the entorhinal cortex in the adult offspring, consistent with the well-documented mesolimbic dopaminergic and temporolimbic pathology in schizophrenia. These results suggest that prenatal poly I : C administration may provide a neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia that reproduces a putative inducing factor; mimics the temporal course as well as some central abnormalities of the disorder; and predicts responsiveness to antipsychotic drugs.Neuropsychopharmacology (2003) 28, 1778-1789. advance online publication, 16 July 2003; doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300248     

Parametric and pharmacological modulations of latent inhibition in mouse inbred strains

Latent inhibition (LI) is a cross species selective attention phenomenon, which is disrupted by amphetamine and enhanced by antipsychotic drugs (APDs). Accumulating data of LI in gene-modified mice as well as in mouse inbred strains suggest genetic component of LI. Here we study modulation of LI in mouse inbred strains with spontaneously disrupted LI by parametric manipulations (number of pre-exposures and conditioning trials) and pharmacological treatments with antipsychotics and NMDA modulator, D-serine. C3H/He and CBA/J inbred mice showed disrupted LI under conditions with 40 pre-exposures (PE) and 2 trials of the conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus (CS-US) due to either loss of the pre-exposure effect or a ceiling effect of poor learning, respectively. The increased number of pre-exposures and/or number of conditioning trials corrected expression of LI in these inbred mice. The disrupted LI was also reversed by haloperidol in both inbred strains at 1.2 mg/kg but not at 0.4 mg/kg, as well as by clozapine (at 3 mg/kg in C3H/He and at 9 mg/kg in CBA/J mice). D-serine potentiated LI in C3H/He mice at 600 mg/kg, but not in the CBA/J at both studied doses (600 and 1800 mg/kg). Desipramine (10 mg/kg) had no effect on LI in both inbred mouse strains. Our findings demonstrated some resemblance between the effects of parametric and pharmacological manipulations on LI, suggesting that APDs may affect the capacity of the brain processes environmental stimuli in LI. Taken together, LI may offer a translational strategy that allows prediction of drug efficacy for cognitive impairments in schizophrenia.     

Sex-Dependent Antipsychotic Capacity of 17��-Estradiol in the Latent Inhibition Model: A Typical Antipsychotic Drug in Both Sexes, Atypical Antipsychotic Drug in Males

The estrogen hypothesis of schizophrenia suggests that estrogen is a natural neuroprotector in women and that exogenous estrogen may have antipsychotic potential, but results of clinical studies have been inconsistent. We have recently shown using the latent inhibition (LI) model of schizophrenia that 17β-estradiol exerts antipsychotic activity in ovariectomized (OVX) rats. The present study sought to extend the characterization of the antipsychotic action of 17β-estradiol (10, 50 and 150 μg/kg) by testing its capacity to reverse amphetamine- and MK-801-induced LI aberrations in gonadally intact female and male rats. No-drug controls of both sexes showed LI, ie, reduced efficacy of a previously non-reinforced stimulus to gain behavioral control when paired with reinforcement, if conditioned with two but not five tone-shock pairings. In both sexes, amphetamine (1 mg/kg) and MK-801 (50 μg/kg) produced disruption (under weak conditioning) and persistence (under strong conditioning) of LI, modeling positive and negative/cognitive symptoms, respectively. 17β-estradiol at 50 and 150 μg/kg potentiated LI under strong conditioning and reversed amphetamine-induced LI disruption in both males and females, mimicking the action of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs) in the LI model. 17β-estradiol also reversed MK-induced persistent LI, an effect mimicking atypical APDs and NMDA receptor enhancers, but this effect was observed in males and OVX females but not in intact females. These findings indicate that in the LI model, 17β-estradiol exerts a clear-cut antipsychotic activity in both sexes and, remarkably, is more efficacious in males and OVX females where it also exerts activity considered predictive of anti-negative/cognitive symptoms.     

Clozapine and haloperidol reinstate latent inhibition following its disruption during amphetamine withdrawal.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral phenomenon whereby repeated exposure to a non-reinforced stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. Deficits in LI may reflect an inability to ignore irrelevant stimuli and are studied as a model of the cognitive/attentional abnormalities found in schizophrenia. We recently determined that pretreatment with escalating doses of the indirect dopamine agonist amphetamine (AMPH; 3 daily injections ip, 1-5 mg/kg, over 6 days) disrupts LI in rats tested in a 2-way active avoidance paradigm during withdrawal. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of the atypical neuroleptic clozapine and the typical neuroleptic haloperidol on the expression of LI on day 4 of AMPH withdrawal. Neuroleptic injections were given either 45 min prior to each of two tone preexposure sessions and a subsequent tone-shock avoidance test session, or only prior to the test session. As expected, saline-injected control groups showed LI during the test session, as reflected by significantly reduced avoidance in tone preexposed vs. non-preexposed rats. In contrast, animals pretreated with escalating doses of AMPH did not show LI, due to the improved avoidance of the preexposed animals. Both haloperidol (0.03 mg/kg) and clozapine (5 mg/kg) largely reversed the disruptive influence of AMPH on LI regardless of whether these drugs were administered prior to both preexposure and test sessions or only prior to the test session. These results provide pharmacological validation for an AMPH withdrawal model of schizophrenic symptoms.     

Abnormally persistent latent inhibition induced by MK801 is reversed by risperidone and by positive modulators of NMDA receptor function: differential efficacy depending on the stage of the task at which they are administered

Rationale Latent inhibition (LI) is the poorer conditioning to a stimulus resulting from its nonreinforced preexposure. LI indexes the ability to ignore irrelevant stimuli and is used extensively to model attentional impairments in schizophrenia (SZ). We showed that rats and mice treated with the N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonist MK801 expressed LI under conditions preventing LI expression in controls. This abnormally persistent LI was reversed by the atypical antipsychotic drug (APD) clozapine and by compounds enhancing NMDA transmission via the glycineB site, but not by the typical APD haloperidol, lending the MK801 LI model predictive validity for negative/cognitive symptoms. Objective To test additional representatives from the two classes of drugs and show that the model can dissociate between atypical APDs and glycinergic drugs are the objectives of the study. Materials and methods LI was measured in a conditional emotional response procedure. Atypical APD risperidone, selective 5HT2A antagonist M100907, and three glycinergic drugs were administered in preexposure or conditioning. Results Rats treated with MK801 (0.05 mg/kg) exhibited LI under conditions that disrupted LI in controls. This abnormality was reversed by risperidone (0.25 and 0.067 mg/kg) and M100907 (1 mg/kg) given in preexposure. Glycine (0.8 g/kg), d-cycloserine (DCS;15 and 30 mg/kg), and glycyldodecylamide (GDA; 0.05 and 0.1 g/kg.) counteracted MK801-induced LI persistence when given in conditioning. Conclusions These results support the validity of MK801-induced persistent LI as a model of negative/cognitive symptoms in SZ and indicate that this model may have a unique capacity to discriminate between typical APDs, atypical APDs, and glycinergic compounds, and thus, foster the identification of novel treatments for SZ.     

Disruption and potentiation of latent inhibition by risperidone: the latent inhibition model of atypical antipsychotic action.

Latent inhibition (LI), that is, retarded conditioning to a stimulus following its nonreinforced pre-exposure, is impaired in some subsets of schizophrenia patients and in amphetamine-treated rats. Potentiation of LI by antipsychotic drugs (APDs) given in conditioning, under conditions that do not lead to LI in controls, is a well-established index of antipsychotic activity. Recently, we have shown that the atypical APD, clozapine, in addition disrupts LI if administered in pre-exposure, under conditions that lead to LI in controls. This study demonstrates the same behavioral profile for the atypical APD risperidone. LI was measured in a thirst-motivated conditioned emotional response procedure by comparing suppression of drinking in response to a tone previously paired with a foot shock in rats that received nonreinforced exposure to the tone prior to conditioning (pre-exposed (PE)) and rats for whom the tone was novel (non-pre-exposed (NPE)). We show that under conditions that did not yield LI in vehicle controls (40 pre-exposures and five conditioning trials), risperidone (0.25, 0.5, and 1.2 mg/kg) led to LI when administered in conditioning. Under conditions that led to LI in vehicle controls (40 pre-exposures and two conditioning trials), risperidone (0.25, 0.5, and 2.5 mg/kg) abolished LI when administered in pre-exposure; the latter effect was not evident with haloperidol. In addition, the effects of risperidone administered in both the pre-exposure and conditioning stages were dose-dependent so that the pre-exposure-based action was manifested at lower but not at higher doses. It is concluded that atypical APDs exert in the LI model a dual pattern of effects, which enables detection of their 'typical' action (conditioning-based LI potentiation) as well as a dissociation from typical APDs by their 'atypical' action (pre-exposure-based LI disruption). It is suggested that the former and latter effects are subserved by D2 and 5HT2A antagonism, respectively.     

Facilitation of latent inhibition by the atypical antipsychotic risperidone

The action of the atypical antipsychotic risperidone on latent inhibition (LI), an animal model of schizophrenia, was investigated. The parameters of the procedure were set at values insufficient to generate LI in control rats. On the first day, rats administered 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg ip risperidone or vehicle were preexposed (PE) to 10 tone presentations. On the second day, they were again injected with drug or vehicle and then submitted to two conditioned stimulus (CS; tone)-unconditioned stimulus (US; shock) pairings. On the third day, suppression of their drinking response under the CS was measured. Nonpreexposed (NPE) animals were submitted to the same procedure except for the tone preexposure. On the suppression test, LI was not observed in control rats as well as in animals given 0.5 mg/kg risperidone. Animals given 1.0 and 2.0 mg risperidone, however, displayed an LI effect. The facilitation of LI by risperidone gives additional support to the LI paradigm as an animal model of schizophrenia.     

PD-135,158, a cholecystokinin(B) antagonist, enhances latent inhibition in the rat

The antipsychotic potential of cholecystokinin (CCK)-related compounds stems from CCK's colocalization with dopamine (DA). CCK demonstrates excitatory and inhibitory effects on DA in the mesolimbic pathway. Such diverse actions might be mediated by different receptor subtypes (CCK(A) or CCK(B)). Multiple hypotheses have emerged regarding the clinical application of CCK-based drugs. Administering selective nonpeptide antagonists within animal models relevant to schizophrenia would help delineate CCK receptor involvement. One animal model simulating a cognitive dysfunction of schizophrenia is latent inhibition (LI). An animal repeatedly exposed to a stimulus that is devoid of consequence is subsequently inhibited in making new associations with that stimulus. This reflects a process of learning to ignore irrelevant stimuli. The present study examined the effects of the selective CCK(B) antagonist PD-135,158 (0.001, 0. 01, and 0.1 mg/kg) using a conditioned suppression of drinking procedure in rats. For purposes of comparison the effects of haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) were also investigated. PD-135,158 (0.1 mg/kg), similar to haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg), elicited a clear LI effect under conditions that did not lead to LI in control rats (low number of preexposures). These findings highlight the antipsychotic potential of CCK(B) antagonists, and further illustrate the LI paradigm's capacity to detect novel, antipsychotic-like, drug activity.     

The effects of the new antipsychotic, sertindole, on latent inhibition in rats

Latent inhibition (LI) is a measure of retarded conditioning to a previously presented non-reinforced stimulus, that is impaired in schizophrenic patients and in rats treated with amphetamine. Neuroleptic drugs are known to produce two effects in this paradigm: to antagonize amphetamine-induced disruption of LI, and to facilitate the development of LI when administered on their own. The present experiments tested the effects on LI of the new neuroleptic, sertindole. The experiments used a conditioned emotional response procedure in rats licking for water, consisting of three stages: pre-exposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus (a tone) was repeatedly presented without being followed by reinforcement; conditioning, in which the pre-exposed stimulus was paired with reinforcement (a foot shock); and test, in which LI was indexed by degree of suppression of licking during tone presentation. In Experiment 1 the effects of 0.31, 1.3 and 5.0mg/kg sertindole were assessed following pre-exposure to 40 non-reinforced tones. Experiment 2 tested the effects of 5mg/kg on LI following pre-exposure to 10 non-reinforced tones. Experiment 3 investigated antagonism of amphetamine-induced disruption of LI by 5.0mg/kg sertindole. The results demonstrated that sertindole (5.0mg/kg) possesses a neuroleptic-like profile in the LI model: it facilitates the development of LI and antagonizes amphetamine-induced disruption of LI.     

Haloperidol and clozapine antagonise amphetamine-induced disruption of latent inhibition of conditioned taste aversion

Rationale Latent inhibition (LI) describes a process by which repeated pre-exposure of a stimulus without any consequence retards the learning of subsequent conditioned associations with that stimulus. It is well established that LI is impaired in rats and in humans by injections of the indirect dopamine agonist amphetamine (AMPH), and that this disruption can be prevented by co-administration of either the typical neuroleptic haloperidol (HAL) or the atypical neuroleptic clozapine (CLZ).Objectives Most of what is known of the pharmacology of LI is derived from studies using either the conditioned emotional response or the conditioned active avoidance paradigm. The goal of the present study was to determine whether these results would generalize to the conditioned taste aversion assay.Methods We tested whether AMPH (0.5 mg/kg) pretreatment would disrupt LI of a conditioned aversion to sucrose, and if so, which stage of the procedure is critical for mediating the disruption; in addition, we tested whether HAL (0.2 mg/kg) or CLZ (5.0 mg/kg) could restore such an expected LI disruption.Results We determined that AMPH disrupted LI when it was injected before pre-exposure and prior to conditioning, but not if the rats were injected before either stage alone. When HAL or CLZ was given 40 min before AMPH (before both pre-exposure and conditioning), it blocked LI disruption.Conclusion These results are in line with the pharmacology of LI as derived from other conditioning paradigms. We conclude that the pharmacological regulation of LI in the CTA paradigm is similar to what has been observed previously in the conditioned emotional response and the conditioned active avoidance paradigms.     

Phencyclidine does not disrupt latent inhibition in rats: implications for animal models of schizophrenia.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral paradigm in which prior exposure to a stimulus not followed by reinforcement retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus when it is paired with reinforcement. The development of LI reflects a process of learning to ignore, or tune out, irrelevant stimuli. Three experiments investigated the effects of phencyclidine (PCP) on LI. The investigation was carried out using a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure consisting of three stages: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was repeatedly presented without reinforcement; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with shock; and test, where LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. The three stages were conducted 24 h apart. In Experiment 1, 1 mg/kg PCP was administered either in the preexposure or in the conditioning stage or in both. Experiment 2 used 5 mg/kg PCP in the same procedure. In Experiment 3, 5 mg/kg PCP was administered throughout the LI procedure, including the test stage. In all three experiments, PCP did not affect LI. The implications of these findings for the development of animal models of schizophrenia are discussed.     

Latent inhibition is unaffected by direct dopamine agonists.

Latent inhibition (LI) refers to the finding that nonreinforced preexposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus when it is paired with reinforcement. The development of LI reflects a process of learning not to attend, or ignore, irrelevant stimuli. Previous experiments showed that LI was disrupted by low but not high doses of amphetamine, and facilitated by neuroleptic drugs. The present experiments sought to investigate the role of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in LI disruption. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that the selective D1 agonist, SKF-38393 (1, 5, 10 mg/kg) and the selective D2 agonist, quinpirole (0.1, 0.3, 1.0 mg/kg), did not affect LI. Experiment 3 showed that both low (0.3 mg/kg) and high (1.5 mg/kg) doses of the mixed D1-D2 agonist, apomorphine, failed to affect L1. These results show that L1 is not disrupted by direct stimulation of DA receptors and suggest that the differential effect exerted on this phenomenon by apomorphine (and possibly SKF-38393 and quinpirole) and amphetamine is related to the direct versus the indirect agonist action of these drugs. In addition, apomorphine at the dose of 0.03 mg/kg, which is believed to activate preferentially DA autoreceptors, did not produce neuroleptic-like facilitation of LI. The implications of the results of the involvement of DA mechanisms in L1 are discussed.     

Systemic administration of MK-801 produces an abnormally persistent latent inhibition which is reversed by clozapine but not haloperidol

Abstract Rationale. Latent inhibition (LI) refers to retarded conditioning to a stimulus as a consequence of its inconsequential pre-exposure, and disrupted LI in the rat is considered to model an attentional deficit in schizophrenia. Blockade of NMDA receptor transmission, which produces behavioral effects potentially relevant to schizophrenic symptomatology in several animal models, has been reported to spare LI. Objectives. To show that systemic administration of the non-competitive NMDA antagonist MK-801 will lead to an abnormally persistent LI which will emerge under conditions that disrupt LI in controls, and that this will be reversed by the atypical neuroleptic clozapine but not by the typical neuroleptic haloperidol, as found for other NMDA antagonist-induced models. Methods. LI was measured in a thirst-motivated conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure by comparing suppression of drinking in response to a tone in rats which previously received 0 (non-pre-exposed) or 40 tone exposures (pre-exposed) followed by two (experiment 1) or five (experiments 2–5) tone – foot shock pairings. Results. MK-801 at doses of 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg reduced conditioned suppression while no effect on suppression was seen at the 0.05 mg/kg dose. At the latter dose, intact LI was seen with parameters that produced LI in controls (40 pre-exposures and two conditioning trials). Raising the number of conditioning trials to five disrupted LI in control rats, but MK-801-treated rats continued to show LI, and this abnormally persistent LI was due to the action of MK-801 in the conditioning stage. MK-801-induced LI perseveration was unaffected by both haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) and clozapine (5 mg/kg) administered in conditioning, and was reversed by clozapine but not by haloperidol administered in pre-exposure. Conclusion. MK-801-induced perseveration of LI is consistent with other reports of perseverative behaviors, suggested to be particularly relevant to negative symptoms of schizophrenia, following NMDA receptor blockade. We suggest that LI perseveration may model impaired attentional set shifting associated with negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Moreover, the finding that the action of MK-801 on LI and the action of clozapine are exerted in different stages of the LI procedure suggests that the MK-801-based LI model may provide a unique screening tool for the identification of novel antipsychotic compounds, whereby the schizophrenia-mimicking LI abnormality is drug-induced, but the detection of the antipsychotic action is not dependent on the mechanism of action of the pro-psychotic drug. Electronic Publication