Epidural midazolam with saline--optimal dose for postoperative pain]

Optimal dose of epidural midazolam with saline for postoperative pain relief was investigated. Forty three patients for upper abdominal surgery were divided into 5 groups. Each group had either 10 ml saline only (saline group), 10 ml saline + midazolam 0.025 mg.kg-1 (0.025 group), 10 ml saline + midazolam 0.05 mg.kg-1 (0.05 group), 10 ml saline + midazolam 0.075 mg.kg-1 (0.075 group), or 10 ml saline + midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 (0.1 group) administered epidurally for complaint of postoperative pain. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and sedation score (SS) were monitored for 120 minutes, and the time interval for next analgesics (TNA) was checked. In each group, BP was unchanged compared with preinjection level. HR changes were less in 0.05 and 0.1 group than in others. RR changes were less in 0.025 and 0.05 group than in others. Optimal SSs were obtained in 0.025 and 0.05 groups. In 0.075 and 0.1 groups, many patients fell into complete sleep (not responded to verbal command). TNA was about 2 hours in 0.025 and 0.05 groups, over 6 hours in 0.075 and 0.1 groups. Complete sleep was the cause of long TNA in 0.075 and 0.1 groups. It was concluded that optimal dose of epidural midazolam with saline 10 ml was 0.05 mg.kg-1 for postoperative pain relief after upper abdominal surgery.     

Epidural midazolam with bupivacaine--optimal dose for postoperative pain relief]

Optimal dose of epidural midazolam with bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief was investigated. Forty seven patients for upper abdominal surgery were divided into 5 groups. Each group had either 0.25% bupivacaine 6 ml (control group), 0.25% bupivacaine 6 ml + midazolam 0.025 mg.kg-1 (0.025 group), 0.05 mg.kg-1 (0.05 group), 0.075 mg.kg-1 (0.075 group), or 0.1 mg.kg-1 (0.1 group) administered epidurally for complaint of first postoperative pain. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and sedation score (SS) were monitored for 120 minutes, and the time interval for next analgesics (TNA) was checked. In each group, BP fell down 10 minutes after injection, HR was unchanged, and RR (except for 0.1 group) decreased, compared with the preinjection level. There was no difference between control group and others in BP, HR and RR. But 3 cases in 0.075 group and 4 cases in 0.1 group needed chin lift with a pillow under the shoulder for slight airway obstruction. The most optimal SS was obtained in 0.05 group. TNA was significantly longer in 0.025 and 0.05 groups than in the control group. It was concluded that the optimal dose of epidural midazolam with 0.25% bupivacaine 6 ml was 0.05 mg.kg-1 for postoperative pain relief after an upper abdominal surgery.     

Epidural administration of midazolam with saline or bupivacaine for postoperative pain]

Postoperative pain relief and sedation with epidural midazolam-saline or midazolam-bupivacaine were studied in 46 patients after elective upper abdominal surgery. They were divided into 6 groups. In each group, 10 ml saline, 10 ml saline+midazolam 0.05 mg.kg-1, 10 ml saline+midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 (saline group), 0.25% bupivacaine 6 ml, 0.25% bupivacaine 6 ml + midazolam 0.05 mg.kg-1 or 0.25% bupivacaine 6 ml + midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 (bupivacaine group) was administered via epidural catheter for complaint of pain. For 120 minutes after epidural injection, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), sedation score, and serum concentration of midazolam (conc midazolam) were evaluated. The time interval until next complaint of pain (pain relief time) was measured. In midazolam injected group, BP, HR, RR were not changed from preinjection value, but sufficient sedation was obtained and pain relief time was significantly prolonged compared with saline or bupivacaine injected group. Midazolam level was lower than that of sedation level. There were no significant differences between saline group and bupivacaine group, but the pain relief effect was slightly stronger in bupivacaine group. It is concluded that epidural saline - midazolam or 0.25% bupivacaine - midazolam is useful for postoperative pain relief after upper abdominal surgery.     

Epidural analgesia for postoperative pain

Epidural analgesia provides superior analgesia compared with other postoperative analgesic techniques. Additionally, perioperative epidural analgesia confers physiologic benefits, which may potentially decrease perioperative complications and improve postoperative outcome. However, there are many variables (eg, choice of analgesics, catheter-incision congruency, and duration of analgesia) that may influence the efficacy of epidural analgesia. In addition, the use of epidural analgesia should be evaluated on an individual basis because there are risks associated with this technique.     

Epidural sufentanil for postoperative pain relief

An open pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the analgesic properties of epidurally administered sufentanil in the early postoperative period. After orthopaedic surgery of the lower extremity, four different groups of five adult patients each received either 15 micrograms (group 1), 30 micrograms (group 2), 50 micrograms (group 3) or 75 micrograms (group 4) sufentanil via an epidural catheter previously used for the surgical procedure. Results were satisfactory in groups 3 and 4 with very good relief of pain and a mean duration of action of 372 and 307 minutes respectively. Dosage above 50 micrograms did not seem to improve the quality or duration of pain relief, although the onset of action was faster with 75 micrograms. Sedation was always present in patients with effective analgesia. In the present study respiratory depression was not evident, but three patients complained of itching and two of urinary retention.     

Epidural ketamine for control of postoperative pain

The study was undertaken to evaluate the postoperative pain control ability of ketamine injected into the epidural space. We conclude that it produces potent postoperative analgesia without major respiratory depression or other side effects.     

Epidural droperidol and morphine for postoperative pain

Epidural morphine is effective in the treatment of postoperative pain, but the incidence of associated side effects is high. To assess a potential reduction of opioid side effects by droperidol, 4 mg morphine with either placebo or 2.5 mg droperidol was injected epidurally in a double-blind, randomized, postoperative trial. Forty patients undergoing hip replacement surgery were studied. The overall incidence of side effects during the first 24 h in the group receiving droperidol and morphine was less than 50% of that in the group receiving placebo and morphine (P less than 0.008). Pruritus, emesis, nausea, urinary retention, and hypotension were diminished in the group with droperidol. No significant differences in duration or quality of analgesia were seen. Epidural injection of droperidol did not result in any local or systemic side effects.     

Epidural perfusion with fentanyl in the treatment of postoperative pain

In 40 patients with high abdominal surgery the analgesia achieved with continuous epidural phentanyl infusion was evaluated. Treatment was started when the patients had pain, with the injection of 150 micrograms of phentanyl in 18 ml of saline and going on with the infusion. The patients were divided in 4 groups. Each received a different infusion dose. The variables pain, alertness, pO2, pCO2 and hemodynamic status at the beginning of infusion and after 6, 18 and 24 hours were evaluated. All patients had an adequate postoperative analgesia. In the statistical analysis the only significant difference was an increase in pCO2 after 24 h in the patients who received the highest doses. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was 10%, with 13.04% of urinary retention Clinical respiratory depression was not observed. We think that administration of 150 micrograms of epidural phentanyl followed by a continuous epidural infusion of the drug (0.5 microgram/kg/hour in 5 ml of saline) is an adequate technique of postoperative analgesia.     

Epidural tramadol for postoperative pain after Cesarean section

PURPOSE: To compare the post-operative analgesic effect of 100 mg vs 200 mg epidural tramadol and saline in patients undergoing elective Cesarean section. METHODS: Sixty healthy women undergoing Cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia were randomly allocated into three groups (n = 20 in each). Patients received, at skin closure via the epidural catheter, 100 mg tramadol (Group I), 200 mg tramadol (Group II) or 10 ml saline (Control group). Pain scores and side effects were evaluated at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hr after surgery. Mean times to the first analgesic administration, as well as the cumulative doses of analgesic requirements over 24 hr postoperatively were compared. RESULTS: The mean time to first analgesic administration was longer in patients who received 100 mg tramadol (4.5 +/- 3.1 hr) and the 200 mg tramadol (6.6 +/- 3.4 hr) than in those who received placebo (2.8 +/- 2 hr). The mean cumulative doses of meperidine over 24 hr were less in the 100 mg tramadol group (0.3 +/- 0.3 mg x kg(-1)) and the 200 mg tramadol group (0.3 +/- 0.3 mg x kg(-1)) than in the control group (0.7 +/- 0.4 mg x kg(-1)). Also, the mean doses of diclofenac over 24 hr were less in the 100 mg tramadol group (156 +/- 59 mg) and the 200 mg tramadol group (142 +/- 62 mg) than in the control group (214 +/- 70 mg). However, no difference was obtained between patients receiving 100 mg and 200 mg tramadol concerning all parameters studied. CONCLUSION: Epidural tramadol 100 mg can provide adequate postoperative analgesia without respiratory depression in patients after Cesarean delivery.     

Epidural morphine for postoperative pain relief in children

Epidural morphine for postoperative pain relief is in general use, and has proved to be very efficient in adults. The epidural technique and the use of epidural morphine are much less frequent in children. For 2 years we have prospectively followed 76 children who had epidural morphine for postoperative pain relief after major abdominal surgery. The age distribution was from newborn to 13 years, with a median age of 12 months. It was estimated that 94% of the patients had good analgesia for the first 24 postoperative hours and no other opioids were given. The side effects were few, but one case of respiratory depression was seen and 20% of the children had pruritus. There were four dural punctures and three catheters slipped out accidentally, but otherwise the treatment was continued as long as it was considered necessary (1–11 days). The use of postoperative ventilatory support decreased during the investigation. We observed a change in the sleeping pattern with an increased number of sleep–induced myoclonia during the administration of epidural morphine. In conclusion, the use of epidural morphine in children for postoperative pain relief is very efficient. The minimal effective dose has not been established as yet, but 50 Hg/kg every 8 h, supplemented with small doses of bupivacaine, provides excellent analgesia in the immediate postoperative period after major abdominal surgery. The side effects are few, but the risk of respiratory depression is always present and observation in the intensive care unit or recovery for the first 24 h is strongly recommended.     

Epidural clonidine for treatment of postoperative pain after thoracotomy. A double-blind placebo-controlled study

Clonidine has been reported to produce analgesia in humans in different painful conditions. The aim of the present study was to investigate if epidural clonidine produced a clinically important analgesia to severe postoperative pain. Using a controlled, randomized double-blind design, one group of patients received a single dose of epidural clonidine 3 micrograms/kg (n = 10) and a control group epidural 0.9% saline (n = 10), when reporting postoperative pain after thoracotomy performed under standardized anaesthesia. To quantify the effects of the given epidural drugs, the need for supplementary, intravenous pethidine analgesia was recorded. The patients had access to the supplementary analgesic by means of a patient-controlled analgesic-delivery device. The two groups were similar regarding anthropometric and clinical data. Epidural clonidine 3 micrograms/kg did not affect the need for supplementary intravenous pethidine analgesia, as compared to the control group at any time during the first 12 h postoperatively. The side-effects of epidural clonidine were tolerable, and no treatment for arterial hypotension was required. No early or delayed respiratory depression occurred. In conclusion, clonidine 3 micrograms/kg epidurally seems to lack clinically important analgesic effects on severe postoperative pain, at least following thoracotomy.