Psychometric investigation of the specific phobia of vomiting inventory: A new factor model

Well‐validated, standardized measures are lacking for the assessment of emetophobia, the specific phobia of vomiting. The Specific Phobia of Vomiting Inventory (SPOVI) was recently developed and shows promise as a useful measure of emetophobia. The goal of the present study was to further examine and investigate the psychometric properties of the SPOVI in a large student sample (n = 1626), specifically focusing on its factor structure, measurement invariance across gender, and convergent/divergent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis results provide support for a one‐factor model of the SPOVI, in contrast to the previously proposed two‐factor model. Internal consistency of the SPOVI was good (α = 0.89) and measurement invariance across gender invariance was supported. The SPOVI also demonstrated good psychometric properties with respect to convergent and divergent validity. The present study's demonstration of the reliability and validity of the SPOVI suggests that the instrument may be a valuable tool for assessing emetophobia symptoms based on its one‐factor structure.     

Reliability,validity and sensitivity of a computerized visual analog scale measuring state anxiety

Background and objectivesAssessment of state anxiety is frequently required in clinical and research settings, but its measurement using standard multi-item inventories entails practical challenges. Such inventories are increasingly complemented by paper-and-pencil, single-item visual analog scales measuring state anxiety (VAS-A), which allow rapid assessment of current anxiety states. Computerized versions of VAS-A offer additional advantages, including facilitated and accurate data collection and analysis, and applicability to computer-based protocols. Here, we establish the psychometric properties of a computerized VAS-A.MethodsExperiment 1 assessed the reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the computerized VAS-A in a non-selected sample. Experiment 2 assessed its sensitivity to increase in state anxiety following social stress induction, in participants with high levels of social anxiety.ResultsExperiment 1 demonstrated the computerized VAS-A's test-retest reliability (r = .44, p < .001); convergent validity with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory's state subscale (STAI-State; r = .60, p < .001); and discriminant validity as indicated by significantly lower correlations between VAS-A and different psychological measures relative to the correlation between VAS-A and STAI-State. Experiment 2 demonstrated the VAS-A's sensitivity to changes in state anxiety via a significant pre- to during-stressor rise in VAS-A scores (F(1,48) = 25.13, p < .001).LimitationsSet-order administration of measures, absence of clinically-anxious population, and gender-unbalanced samples.ConclusionsThe adequate psychometric characteristics, combined with simple and rapid administration, make the computerized VAS-A a valuable self-rating tool for state anxiety. It may prove particularly useful for clinical and research settings where multi-item inventories are less applicable, including computer-based treatment and assessment protocols. The VAS-A is freely available: http://people.socsci.tau.ac.il/mu/anxietytrauma/visual-analog-scale/.     

The Chinese version of the Child and Adolescent Scale of Environment (CASE-C): Validity and reliability for children with disabilities in Taiwan

Measurement of children's participation and environmental factors is a key component of the assessment in the new Disability Evaluation System (DES) in Taiwan. The Child and Adolescent Scale of Environment (CASE) was translated into Traditional Chinese (CASE-C) and used for assessing environmental factors affecting the participation of children and youth with disabilities in the DES. The aim of this study was to validate the CASE-C. Participants were 614 children and youth aged 6.0–17.9 years with disabilities, with the largest condition group comprised of children with intellectual disability (61%). Internal structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant (known group) validity were examined using exploratory factor analyses, Cronbach's α coefficient, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), correlation analyses, and univariate ANOVAs. A three-factor structure (Family/Community Resources, Assistance/Attitude Supports, and Physical Design Access) of the CASE-C was produced with 38% variance explained. The CASE-C had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .74–.86) and test-retest reliability (ICCs = .73–.90). Children and youth with disabilities who had higher levels of severity of impairment encountered more environmental barriers and those experiencing more environmental problems also had greater restrictions in participation. The CASE-C scores were found to distinguish children on the basis of disability condition and impairment severity, but not on the basis of age or sex. The CASE-C is valid for assessing environmental problems experienced by children and youth with disabilities in Taiwan.     

Avoidance behaviour of patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. Initial development of a questionnaire, psychometric properties and treatment sensitivity

In this study, the development of the Posttraumatic Avoidance Behaviour Questionnaire (PABQ) is described and validated in 437 participants; PTSD patients (N = 75), clinical controls (patients with panic disorder with agoraphobia; PDA) (N = 50), and non-clinical traumatized controls (N = 312). Item reduction and exploratory factor analyses yielded 25 items reflecting seven factors. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminative validity of the PABQ proved adequate. In a second study, the PABQ showed to be sensitive to change due to exposure treatment outcome (N = 26).     

A preliminary examination of the validity and reliability of a new brief rating scale for symptom domains of psychosis: Brief Evaluation of Psychosis Symptom Domains (BE-PSD)

BackgroundBrief assessments have the potential to be widely adopted as outcome measures in research but also routine clinical practice. Existing brief rating scales that assess symptoms of schizophrenia or psychosis have a number of limitations including inability to capture five symptom domains of psychosis and a lack of clearly defined operational anchor points for scoring.MethodsWe developed a new brief rating scale for five symptom domains of psychosis with clearly defined operational anchor points – the Brief Evaluation of Psychosis Symptom Domains (BE-PSD). To examine the psychometric properties of the BE-PSD, fifty patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were included in this preliminary cross-sectional study. To test the convergent and discriminant validity of the BE-PSD, correlational analyses were employed using the consensus Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) five-factor model. To examine the inter-rater reliability of the BE-PSD, single measures intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for 11 patients.ResultsThe BE-PSD domain scores demonstrated high convergent validity with the corresponding PANSS factor score (r_s = 0.81–0.93) as well as good discriminant validity, as evidenced by lower correlations with the other PANSS factors (r_s = 0.23–0.62). The BE-PSD also demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability for each of the domain scores and the total scores (ICC(2,1) = 0.79–0.96).ConclusionsThe present preliminary study found the BE-PSD measure to be valid and reliable; however, further studies are needed to establish the psychometric properties of the BE-PSD because of the limitations such as the small sample size and lacking data on test-retest reliability or sensitivity to change.     

Validation of the geriatric sleep questionnaire

ObjectiveAssessing sleep in later life is essential for diagnosing and treating sleep problems and their consequences. We aimed to test a short questionnaire specifically designed to assess the subjective sleep quality in older people, the Geriatric Sleep Questionnaire (GSQ).MethodThe GSQ was validated in a Portuguese sample of older people (N = 443; 65–100 years; M = 80.02; SD = 6.95). We analyzed reliability, factor validity, convergent validity with other theoretical similar constructs, discriminant validity with a theoretically divergent measure, and predictive power to detect sleep problems (ROC analysis).ResultsA six-item version was obtained with good reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.79), and adequate convergent and divergent validity (p < 0.01). ROC analysis revealed a sensitivity of 80.0% and a specificity of 66.7% in detecting sleep problems with a cutoff point of 16 (AUC = 0.72). Older people in social care, low education, and living in rural areas reported worse sleep quality.ConclusionThe GSQ-6 is a brief instrument with good psychometric characteristics to assess the subjective sleep quality in older people. The GSQ-6 seems to be a valuable tool for future investigations on the relationship of sleep quality with mental health and well-being in older people.     

Factorial validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (age band 2)

The Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (M-ABC-2) is one of the most commonly used tests for the diagnosis of specific developmental disorders of motor function (F82). The M-ABC-2 comprises eight subtests per age band (AB) that are assigned to three dimensions: manual dexterity, aiming and catching, and balance. However, while previous exploratory findings suggested the correctness of the assumption of factorial validity, there is no empirical evidence that the M-ABC-2 subtests allow for a valid reproduction of the postulated factorial structure. The purpose of this study was to empirically confirm the factorial validity of the M-ABC-2. The German normative sample of AB2 (7-10 years; N = 323) was used as the study sample for the empirical analyses. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to verify the factorial validity of the M-ABC-2 (AB2). The incremental fit indices (χ² = 28.675; df = 17; Bollen-Stine p value = 0.318; RMSEA = 0.046 [0.011-0.075]; SRMR = 0.038; CFI = 0.960) provided evidence for the factorial validity of the M-ABC-2 (AB2). However, because of a lack of empirical verification for convergent and discriminant validity, there is still no evidence that F82 can be diagnosed using M-ABC-2 (AB2).     

Psychometric properties of the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Effective management of depression is predicated upon reliable assessment. The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) is a depression severity scale with both self-rated (QIDS-SR₁₆) and clinician-rated (QIDS-C₁₆) versions. Although widely used in research, the psychometric properties of the QIDS₁₆ have not been systematically reviewed. We performed a systematic review of studies of the psychometric properties (factor structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant validity, test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change) of the QIDS-SR₁₆ or QIDS-C₁₆. Six databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CinAHL, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Findings were summarised, bias assessed and correlations with reference standards were pooled. 37 studies (17,118 participants) were included in the review. Both versions of the QIDS₁₆ were unidimensional. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.69 to 0.89 for the QIDS-SR₁₆ and 0.65 to 0.87 for the QIDS-C₁₆. The QIDS-SR₁₆ correlated moderately to highly with several depression severity scales. Seven studies were pooled where QIDS-SR₁₆ was correlated with the HRSD-17 (r = 0.76, CI 0.69, 0.81) in patients diagnosed with depression. Four studies examined convergent validity with the QIDS-C₁₆. Four studies examined discriminant validity, for the QIDS-SR₁₆ alone. Eighteen studies had at least one author who was a co-author of the original QIDS₁₆ study. Most studies were conducted in the USA (n = 26). The QIDS-SR₁₆ and the QIDS-C₁₆ are unidimensional rating scales with acceptable internal consistency. To justify the use of the QIDS₁₆ scale in clinical practice, more research is needed on convergent and discriminant validity, and in populations outside the USA.     

An initial psychometric assessment of an ICD-11 based measure of PTSD and complex PTSD (ICD-TQ): Evidence of construct validity

Among the conditions following exposure to traumatic life events proposed by ICD-11 are Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD). The primary aim of this study was to provide an assessment of the reliability and validity of a newly developed self-report measure of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD: the ICD-11 Trauma Questionnaire (ICD-TQ). Participants in this study were a sample of individuals who were referred for psychological therapy to a National Health Service (NHS) trauma centre in Scotland (N = 193). Participants completed the ICD-TQ and measures of traumatic life events, DSM-5 PTSD, emotion dysregulation, self–esteem, and interpersonal difficulties. Confirmatory factor analysis results supported the factorial validity of the ICD-TQ with results in line with ICD-11 proposals. The ICD-TQ demonstrated satisfactory internal reliability, and correlation results indicated that the scale exhibited convergent and discriminant validity. Current results provide initial support for the psychometric properties of this initial version of the ICD-TQ. Future theoretical and empirical work will be required to generate a final version of the ICD-TQ that will match the diagnostic structure of PTSD and CPTSD when ICD-11 is published.     

The SWedish Eating Assessment for Autism spectrum disorders (SWEAA)—Validation of a self-report questionnaire targeting eating disturbances within the autism spectrum

The aim was to design and validate a questionnaire pertaining to eating problems in individuals with normal intelligence, within the autism spectrum. The questionnaire was based on literature search and clinical experience. The validation focused on psychometric properties of reliability and validity using a clinical group of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) (n = 57) and a matched, healthy comparison group (n = 31). The instrument showed high levels of reliability, convergent and discriminant validity and scaling properties. Logistic regression analyses discerned the single item Simultaneous capacity and the subscale Social situation at mealtime as the best predictors of ASD. In conclusion, the questionnaire is valid and reliable to detect disturbed eating behaviours in individuals with ASD and normal intelligence.     

Psychometric properties of Internet-administered measures of health anxiety: An investigation of the Health Anxiety Inventory,the Illness Attitude Scales,and the Whiteley Index

BackgroundThe Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI), the Illness Attitude Scales (IAS), and the Whiteley Index (WI) are three of the most widely used health anxiety measures, but their psychometric properties have not been investigated when administered via the Internet.MethodsWe investigated the three instruments' test–retest reliability, internal consistency, convergent, and discriminant validity and sensitivity to change using one sample (n = 111) of participants with severe health anxiety and one sample of healthy controls (n = 92).ResultsThe HAI, IAS, and WI showed high test–retest reliability (rs ≥ .80), good convergent, and discriminant validity and were sensitive to detect change. The HAI and IAS (αs ≥ .85), but not the WI (αs ≤ .60) demonstrated high internal consistency.ConclusionsThe HAI, IAS, and WI have good psychometric properties, except for the low internal consistency of WI, when used as Internet-administered measures of health anxiety. Using these measures over the Internet offers highly important advantages such as increased ease of administration, reduced attrition, and cost-efficient treatment evaluation.     

Validation de la version française du questionnaire I7 d’impulsivité. Influence de la personnalité, du sexe et de la religion

The purpose of this study was to verify the factorial validity and internal reliability of the French version of the Eysenck’s impulsivity scale (I₇) translated by Dupont et al. in a group of Swiss students (n = 220). Eysenck and Eysenck proposed three subscales in their questionnaire : two subscales assessing two distinct components of impulsivity (Impulsiveness characteristic of people who act on the spur of the moment without being aware of any risk involved, and Venturesomeness characteristic of people who are well aware of the risks they might run but are prepared to chance it), and a third one acting as a diversion (Empathy characteristic of people able to experience the feelings, perceptions, and thoughts of another). The Eysenck’s impulsivity scale (I₇) demonstrated a stable and replicable three-factor structure that is congruent with the three dimensions of the Eysenck’s impulsivity scale construct. However, this three-factor solution explained only 21.9 % of the variance. We found satisfactory internal consistency for Impulsiveness (alpha = .78) and Venturesomeness (alpha = .71) scales, and lower internal consistency for Empathy scale (alpha = .62). The analysis of the relationship between impulsivity and personality showed mainly that there was a negative correlation between Impulsiveness and Conscientiousness (r = -.32), and a positive correlation between Venturesomeness and Extraversion (r = .33). Sex had an impact on the Venturesomeness and Empathy scales. This preliminary study suggests that the French version of the Eysenck’s impulsivity scale (I₇) is valid and reliable, but further analyses like test-retest reliability and convergent validity should be conducted.     

Refinement and validation of the Parental Illness Impact Scale

ObjectiveTo refine and validate the Parental Illness Impact Scale (PIIS), a questionnaire designed specifically to measure the quality of life of adolescent and adult children of neurologically affected parents.MethodsKey informant interviews and a literature review were conducted to ensure all relevant themes were incorporated in the revised PIIS (PIIS-R). Pre-testing was achieved through a 17 member expert panel and cognitive interviews with eight adolescent and adult children. The revised instrument was administered to 169 adolescent and adult children of people with Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis and stroke and subjected to psychometric analysis.ResultsPrincipal components analysis resulted in eight subscales accounting for 60.6% of explained variance. The PIIS-R showed good concurrent and discriminant validity through correlations with established measures of quality of life and psychosocial well-being. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α .92), and test-retest reliability values for subscales (r = .59–.74) and total score (r = .79) were moderate to high.ConclusionsThe PIIS-R is a scientifically robust measurement tool for assessing the impact of parental illness, and currently shows strong psychometric properties. Longitudinal data will be required to assess predictive validity and sensitivity to change. The instrument is available to other investigators, who are encouraged to further evaluate its scientific properties.     

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire for intensive care unit inpatients in Brazil: internal consistency,test-retest reliability,and measurement error

Study objectivesTo perform the cross-cultural adaptation of the Richards-Campbell sleep questionnaire (RCSQ) to Portuguese-Brazil and to eval its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and measurement error in intensive care unit (ICU) inpatients.MethodsThe study enrolled 113 inpatients at medical/surgical ICU in Curitiba, Brazil. The RCSQ was first translated to Portuguese-Brazil according to the principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes and then applied in 30 inpatients. The final version (RCSQ-PT-Br) was applied to measure content validity (83 inpatients, 47 men [56.6%], 60.4 ± 14.2 years), and test-retest reliability and measurement error (a subset of 53 inpatients). Internal consistency of the RCSQ-PT-Br was estimated using Cronbach's a; test-retest reliability (2 independent rates) was assessed using the single measurement, absolute agreement, two-way random effects model (ICC_2,1).ResultsGroup-average RCSQ-PT-Br total score was 46.9 ± 26.7 (range 3.4–98.8). The RCSQ-PT-Br total score showed good content internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.850 95%CI = [0.789–0.897]) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC_2,1 = 0.840 95% CI = [0.739–0.904]). Measurement error was low (standard error of mean = 11 mm, mean difference = 30 mm).ConclusionsThe RCSQ-PT-Br is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate the sleep of patients hospitalized in the ICU in Brazil.     

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Biological Rhythms Interview of assessment in neuropsychiatry-self report for delayed sleep-wake phase disorder

ObjectiveThe Biological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (BRIAN) might be applicable for assessing delayed sleep-wake phase disorder (DSWPD). We aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the BRIAN self-report (J-BRIAN-SR) in DSWPD patients and determine a cutoff score to identify the presence of the disorder.MethodsWe enrolled 60 newly diagnosed DSWPD outpatients and 64 age-matched healthy controls. We used Cronbach's alpha for internal reliability to evaluate J-BRIAN-SR. We confirmed the reliability of the A test and re-test using Pearson's correlation coefficient in the controls. We used confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate the factor structure of J-BRIAN-SR and referenced the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) to check concurrent validity. We analyzed the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) to determine the J-BRIAN-SR cutoff point for the presence of DSWPD.ResultsThe 18-component scores of the J-BRIAN-SR had an overall reliability coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) of 0.82. We confirmed a high test-retest reliability using an intraclass correlation coefficient (r = 0.84). The correlation between J-BRIAN-SR and MEQ was 0.38 (p = 0.003). The J-BRIAN-SR that we extracted by exploratory factor analysis consisted of three factors. A score of 40 points provided a sensitivity of 80.0% and a specificity of 75.6% for the positivity of DSWPD.ConclusionsThe results of the present study revealed that J-BRIAN-SR is a valid and reliable instrument for screening and evaluating the severity of DSWPD. Our findings will be useful to physicians and patients in Japan and those in clinical settings.     

A clinical tool to measure trunk control in children with cerebral palsy: the Trunk Control Measurement Scale

In this study the psychometric properties of the Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) in children with cerebral palsy (CP) were examined. Twenty-six children with spastic CP (mean age 11 years 3 months, range 8-15 years; Gross Motor Function Classification System level I n = 11, level II n = 5, level III n = 10) were included in this study. To determine the discriminant ability of the TCMS, 30 typically developing (TD) children (mean age 10 years 6 months, range 8-15 years) were also included. For inter-rater reliability, two testers scored all children simultaneously. To determine test-retest reliability, participants were reassessed on a second test occasion. For construct validity, the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) was administered. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ranged from 0.91 to 0.99 for inter-rater and test-retest reliability. Kappa and weighted kappa values ranged for all but one item from 0.45 to 1. The standard error of measurement was 2.9% and 3.4%, and the smallest detectable difference for repeated measurements was 8% and 9.43% between raters and test-retest, respectively. Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.82 to 0.94. Spearman rank correlation with the GMFM was 0.88 and increasing coefficients were found from dimension B to E. Subscale and total TCMS scores showed significant differences between children with CP and TD children (p < 0.0001). The results support the reliability and validity of the TCMS in children with spastic CP. The scale gives insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the child's trunk performance and therefore can have valuable clinical use.     

Cross validation of the factor structure of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: An Italian multicenter study

The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) has been shown in previous research to measure a general dimension of alexithymia with three intercorrelated factors. This study evaluated the reliability and factorial validity of an Italian translation of the TAS-20 in a group of normal adults (N = 206) and in a mixed group of medical and psychiatric outpatients (N = 642). Using confirmatory factor analyses, the previously established three-factor model of the TAS-20 was found to be replicable in both groups. In addition, the Italian TAS-20 demonstrated adequate estimates of internal reliability and test-retest reliability. Although evaluation of the convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity of the TAS-20 is required in Italian populations, the present results support the use of the Italian translation of the scale for clinical and research purposes.     

Convergent and discriminant validity of attenuated psychosis screening tools

Brief self-report questionnaires that assess attenuated psychotic symptoms have the potential to screen many people who may benefit from clinical monitoring, further evaluation, or early intervention. The extent to which recently developed screening instruments demonstrate sound psychometric properties is an important issue toward the implementation of these measures in clinical practice. This study examines the convergent validity, discriminant validity, and test-retest reliability of four recently developed screening instruments. Screening instruments were included in an assessment battery and administered to a sample of 355 college students. Screening scores support the convergent and discriminant validity and the test-retest reliability of these measures.     

Development of a screening instrument to assess premenstrual dysphoric disorder as conceptualized in DSM-5

ObjectiveThis study aimed at developing and validating a screening instrument to assess premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) based on DSM-5 criteria, which is not yet available.MethodsThe Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder Questionnaire for DSM-5 (Cuestionario del Trastorno Disfórico Premenstrual – DSM-5), a 25-item questionnaire to assess PMDD was developed and completed in Spanish by 2820 women (Age M = 23.43; SD = 7.87). Exploratory factor analysis (N = 1410) and confirmatory factor analysis (N = 1410) were performed in randomly selected subsamples. Empirical evidence of construct validity was obtained via a multitrait-multimethod approach (N = 118). Additional validity evidence was provided by associating PMDD with Neuroticism. Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were checked.ResultsExploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded a bi-dimensional structure. The first dimension, called Dysphoria, included dysphoric symptoms and weight gain; the second dimension, Apathy, referred to apathetic and physical symptoms. Both dimensions displayed good internal consistency coefficients (Dysphoria's ordinal alpha = 0.88; Apathy's ordinal alpha = 0.84), and moderate temporal stability. The multitrait-multimethod analysis showed that convergent coefficients were higher than discriminant coefficients. Furthermore, a positive relationship between Neuroticism and PMDD was observed.ConclusionThese findings suggest that the instrument is valid and reliable to assess PMDD.     

Development and validation of an instrument to assess future orientation and resilience in adolescence

The study is aimed at providing the development and initial validation of the Design My Future (DMF), which may be administered in career counseling and research activities to assess adolescents' future orientation and resilience. Two studies with two independent samples of Italian adolescents were conducted to examine psychometric requisites of DMF. Specifically, in the first study, after developing items and examined the content validity, the factorial structure, reliability and discriminant validity of the DMF were tested. In the second study, the measurement invariance across gender, conducing a sequence of nested CFA models, was evaluated. Results showed good psychometric support for the instrument with Italian adolescents.