Digital panoramic radiography: a clinical survey

The application of digital panoramic radiography with photostimulable phosphors to dental diagnosis was evaluated in 500 patients. Comparative intraoral films of selected groups of teeth and electronic magnifications of the same portion of the arches were obtained in 63 cases. Digital images improved the quality of dental examinations compared with film radiographs. The possibility of contrast modulation was helpful to compensate for the different radiographic densities of the arches and to improve the visibility of gingival soft tissues. In addition, digital radiography reduced the radiation dose administered to the patient. The use of digital panoramic radiography is proposed as a substitute for film studies in all hospitals where a central unit for digital radiology is available. Correspondence to: R. Nessi     

Bilateral coronoid hyperplasia in two brothers

Coronoid hyperplasia is a rare condition of unknown aetiology that can occur in both unilateral and bilateral forms. Without radiographic investigation the diagnosis is often missed. Researchers have postulated a familial form of inheritance. This study reports the occurrence of coronoid hyperplasia in two brothers. The parents were unaffected and there are no other siblings. The diagnosis was confirmed with the aid of panoramic radiographs and axial computed tomographic scans with para-sagittal reconstructions which demonstrated enlargement of the coronoid processes and in one case impingement against the zygomatic bone. One brother was successfully treated with a unilateral intra-oral coronoidectomy whilst the other was unsuccessfully treated with a bilateral intra-oral coronoidectomy.     

The use of digital techniques with storage phosphors for orthopantomography. Preliminary note]

Digital panoramic tomographies with light-emitting phosphors were obtained in 39 patients, during a study on the clinical applications of digital imaging. Performing digital panoramic radiographies required the preliminary adaptation of the imaging plates to the cassette holder of the radiographic equipment. The digital images were post-processed according to two different protocols, both of which were recorded for each patient. The former image was quite similar to standard X-ray films and was called "analogic-like". The latter, called "xeroradiographic-like", featured a flattening of the overall contrast together with detail contrast enhancement due to the presence of an edge effect, as it occurs in xeroradiography. Digital panoramic tomography allows a marked reduction in patient's exposure to X-rays. In addition, this technique offers constant high-quality results, due to the possibility of recovering over- or under-exposed images during post-processing. Xeroradiographic-like digital films may reduce the sharp contrast that is often present between the anterior and the lateral portions of the maxillary and mandibular arches, thus improving the diagnostic reliability of the examination. Other modalities of digital post-processing may be helpful to depict gingival soft tissues, with obvious advantages for the study of periodontal diseases.     

Clinical evaluation of digital radiography based on a large-area cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector compared with screen-film radiography for skeletal system and abdomen

The aim of this clinical study was to compare the image quality of digital radiography using the new digital Bucky system based on a flat-panel detector with that of a conventional screen-film system for the skeletal structure and the abdomen. Fifty patients were examined using digital radiography with a flat-panel detector and screen-film systems, 25 for the skeletal structures and 25 for the abdomen. Six radiologists judged each paired image acquired under the same exposure parameters concerning three observation items for the bone and six items for the abdomen. Digital radiographic images for the bone were evaluated to be similar to screen-film images at the mean of 42.2%, to be superior at 50.2%, and to be inferior at 7.6%. Digital radiographic images for the abdomen were judged to be similar to screen-film images at the mean of 43.4%, superior at 52.4%, and inferior at 4.2%; thus, digital radiographic images were estimated to be either similar as or superior to screen-film images at over 92% for the bone and abdomen. On the statistical analysis, digital radiographic images were also judged to be preferred significantly in the most items for the bone and abdomen. In conclusion, the image quality of digital radiography with a flat-panel detector was superior to that of a screen-film system under the same exposure parameters, suggesting that dose reduction is possible with digital radiography.     

Comparison of observer reliability in assessing alveolar bone changes from color-coded with subtraction radiographs

OBJECTIVES: To assess intra- and interobserver agreement on marginal changes in periodontal bone from color-coded compared with subtraction radiographs. METHODS: Sequential radiographs from patients undergoing periodontal treatment were acquired using direct digital intra-oral radiography. Fifty-one pairs of color-coded and subtraction radiographs were produced and evaluated twice by six dentists for changes in marginal bone. Intra- and interobserver agreement were calculated. RESULTS: Intra-observer agreement was significantly higher for the color-coded radiographs (P < 0.05). Interobserver agreement was significantly higher for color-coded radiographs at the second (P < 0.001) but not the first (P = 0.34) evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Color coding of radiographic differences by means of image addition may be a feasible alternative to the subtraction technique for evaluating periodontal bone changes.     

Agreement between panoramic and intra-oral radiography in the assessment of marginal bone height.

Panoramic and intra-oral radiographs from 400 consecutive patients were evaluated for the assessment of the marginal bone height. Two hundred panoramic radiographs were exposed with the rotational technique and 200 with the intra-oral X-ray tube technique. Measurements of the approximal marginal bone level were independently performed by two observers. Complete agreement between panoramic and intra-oral radiographs was, on average, obtained in 55% and 49% of the sites, respectively. When the criterion for agreement was widened to include recordings with a difference of +/- 1 mm, the agreement was on average 87% irrespective of the techniques compared. The agreement varied with tooth type and severity of the marginal bone loss. Angular bony defects and furcation involvements were recorded separately. For angular bony defects there was a variation in agreement from 33% to 46% for the rotational technique and from 35% to 51% for the intra-oral X-ray tube technique depending on localization. Furcation involvements of the molars were equally recorded in 60% and 59%, respectively, but in only 12% and 28% for the upper premolars. Interobserver agreement was 58% for the intra-oral radiographs, 60% and 59% for the two panoramic techniques. Mean intra-observer agreement was 68%, 66% and 68%. It is concluded that panoramic radiography can often be used for the assessment of marginal bone loss alone, supplemented when necessary by intra-oral radiographs.     

Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice

A review of modern imaging techniques commonly used in dental practice and their clinical applications is presented. The current dental examinations consist of intraoral imaging with digital indirect and direct receptors, while extraoral imaging is divided into traditional tomographic/panoramic imaging and the more recently introduced cone beam computed tomography. Applications, limitations and current trends of these dental “in-office” radiographic techniques are discussed.     

Detection of pulmonary edema in pigs: storage phosphor versus amorphous selenium-based flat-panel-detector radiography

PURPOSE: To compare diagnostic accuracy of soft-copy selenium-based digital radiographic images and soft-copy computed radiographic images obtained for detection of pulmonary edema in pigs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Oleic acid was injected intraatrially into three pigs (weight, 20-25 kg) at doses of 0.04, 0.05, and 0.06 mL/kg to induce pulmonary edema. Thirty-seven sets of computed radiographic, digital radiographic, and thin-section computed tomographic (CT) scans were obtained every 20-30 minutes in three pigs over 4-6 hours. Images were masked for identity, randomly sorted, and displayed on a monitor. Four radiologists rated each image for presence of parenchymal opacities by using a dichotomous scoring system in two sessions. Presence of pulmonary edema was determined with thin-section CT and a severity scale. Intra- and interobserver variations were determined with the kappa statistic and the Z test and with the Cochran Q test and the McNemar test, respectively. True-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative rates were determined. McNemar test was used to determine statistical significance of differences in detection between computed and digital radiographic images. RESULTS: There was no significant intra- or interobserver variation, except for one pair of observers during the first interpretative session with computed radiographic images (P =.016, McNemar test). Overall sensitivity (92.1%) and diagnostic accuracy (90.2%) of digital radiography were significantly higher than those of computed radiography (79.6% and 83.4%, respectively) (P <.001 for sensitivity, P =.01 for diagnostic accuracy, McNemar test). In detection of minimal and mild pulmonary edema, sensitivity of digital radiography (84%) was significantly higher than that of computed radiography (58%) (P <.001). CONCLUSION: Soft-copy digital radiographic images are superior to soft-copy computed radiographic images obtained for detection of mild pulmonary edema in pigs.     

Comparison of plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Bone tunnel widening poses a problem for graft fixation during revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Large variability exists in the utilization of imaging modalities for evaluating bone tunnels in pre-operative planning for revision ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to identify the most reliable imaging modality for identifying bone tunnels and assessing tunnel widening, and specifically, to validate the reliability of radiographs, MRI, and CT using intra- and inter-observer testing. Data was retrospectively collected from twelve patients presenting for revision ACL surgery. Five observers twice measured femoral and tibial tunnels at their widest point using digital calipers in coronal and sagittal planes. Measurements were corrected for magnification. Tunnel identification, diameter measurements, and cross-sectional area (CSA) calculations were recorded. A categorical classification of tunnel measurements was created to apply clinical significance to the measurements. Using kappa statistics, intra- and inter-observer reliability testing was performed. CT demonstrated excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability for tunnel identification. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was significantly less for MRI and radiographs. CT revealed superior reliability versus either radiographs or MRI for CSA analysis. Intra-observer kappa scores for tibial CSA using CT, radiographs, and MRI were 0.66, 0.5, and 0.37, respectively. Inter-observer kappa scores for tibial CSA using CT, radiographs, and MRI were 0.65, 0.39, and 0.32, respectively. Our results demonstrate CT is the most reliable imaging modality for evaluation of ACL bone tunnels as proven by superior intra- and inter-observer testing results when compared to MRI and radiographs. Radiographs and MRI were not reliable, even for simply identifying the presence of a bone tunnel.     

Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT)

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic performance provided by two- (film and digital radiography) and three-dimensional imaging modalities (TACT slices and TACT pseudoholograms) in the detection of primary caries. METHODS: Forty-two extracted human posterior teeth were mounted and imaged with conventional film and direct digital radiography. Free-hand positioning of a dental X-ray source was used for all exposures. From the digital images, iteratively restored TACT slices and TACT pseudoholograms were generated. Film images were viewed on a viewbox. Digital format images were viewed on a high-resolution monitor. Eight observers used a five-point scale to score the presence or absence of occlusal and proximal caries using the four image modalities. Observers' assessments were compared with the histological examination of tooth sections. Possible differences in ROC curve areas among image modalities, observers, and surfaces were assessed by ANOVA. Intra- and interobserver reliability as indicated by intraclass correlation was also calculated. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the diagnostic performances of film, digital radiography, TACT slices and TACT pseudoholograms in the detection of caries (P = 0.310). Intraclass correlation indicated the highest concordance both within and between observers when film was used for the evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Under the experimental conditions of this study, three-dimensional TACT images did not improve caries detection over film or digital radiography. Further research should investigate the effects of imaging variables on TACT's diagnostic efficacy.     

Marginal bone levels measured in film and digital radiographs corrected for attenuation and visual response: an in vivo study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy and precision of measurements on marginal bone levels in differently processed digital radiographs and in film-based radiographs. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with a diagnosis of chronic periodontitis were included in this study. Periapical radiographs were exposed with the Dixi digital intraoral radiographic system (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) and the F-speed Film (Insight, Eastman-Kodak Co., Rochester, NY), respectively. Digital radiographs were subsequently processed into two sets: (a) correction for attenuation and visual response and (b) the same correction but with an additional shift in grey levels. Patients had periodontal surgery immediately after the radiographs were exposed. The vertical distance from cementoenamel junction to the most apical part of the marginal bone was assessed. The measurements were then employed as reference standard and subtracted by the vertical distance from radiographs accordingly. Altogether, 47 sites were evaluated. Seven observers were employed for evaluation under the same viewing conditions. ANOVA was employed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the absolute differences of the vertical distance obtained from radiographs to their corresponding reference standards when comparing differently processed digital radiographs, but the absolute differences were significantly smaller in digital radiographs than in films. Interobserver variances were not significant. CONCLUSION: Digital radiographs have a favourable measurement accuracy compared with film radiographs when assessing marginal bone levels.     

Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy and prediction of asymmetry in panoramic radiographic images

OBJECTIVES: Measurements of ideally positioned and systematically mis-positioned skulls were used to evaluate errors in linear measurements and symmetry ratios made with panoramic X-ray images. METHODS: Digital panoramic images of 30 skulls placed in ideal, shifted and rotated positions, were assessed by measuring distances between anatomic points and fiducial references. Differences between photographic measurements (control) and radiographic measurements were compared. Horizontal measurements included a 20 mm wire and the distance from gonion to mental foramen (G-MF). Vertical distances measured included a 40 mm wire, condyle to sigmoid notch length, and condyle to gonion (posterior mandibular height or PMH). A relative symmetry ratio comparing the difference between right and left PMH was also calculated. Distances measured in panoramic images were corrected using the left vertical wire distance or the panoramic unit's stated magnification factor (1.25x). RESULTS: Greatest differences were noted for horizontal measurements and shifted skull positions. Use of an arbitrary magnification correction was consistently less accurate than use of an internal calibration and resulted in general underestimation of actual dimensions. Measures of PMH varied significantly from expected values for each of the three skull positions (P<0.005). Panoramic accuracy for detecting asymmetry was 67% for ideal, 70% for rotated, and 47% for shifted skull positions when an internal reference was used. CONCLUSIONS: Panoramic radiographs should be used with caution in making absolute measurements or relative comparisons. Even when internal fiducial calibration for image distortion of anatomy is used, measurements such as those assessing posterior mandibular facial symmetry may be unreliable.     

Precision and accuracy of measurements in digital panoramic radiography

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the precision and accuracy of digital measurements in digital panoramic radiography. METHODS: A series of 70 digital panoramic radiographs were obtained of a dry skull in seven different positions with metallic pins and spheres fixed to the mandible. Three replicate measurements were performed with the mouse-driven cursor by one reader at 1:1 and 2:1 magnification. Precision was assessed with the reliability index (R) and Malony/Rastogi test and the effect of magnification on accuracy by paired Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Vertical measurements were less reproducible than horizontal measurements. There were significant differences in assessments between images at 1:1 and 2:1 magnification (P < 0.05). The maximum variation in mean difference was 0.4% of actual object length for pins and 1.2% for spheres. The difference did not exceed 0.1 mm. R was lower for 2:1 magnification and consistently lower for spheres compared with pins. CONCLUSION: The most reliable measurements were obtained of linear objects in the horizontal plane. Digital measurements are sufficiently accurate for clinical use.     

Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography

Objective

To compare proximal caries detection using intraoral bitewing, extraoral bitewing and panoramic radiography.

Methods

80 extracted human premolar and molar teeth with and without proximal caries were used. Intraoral radiographs were taken with Kodak Insight film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY) using the bitewing technique. Extraoral bitewing and panoramic images were obtained using a Planmeca Promax Digital Panoramic X-ray unit (Planmeca Inc., Helsinki, Finland). Images were evaluated by three observers twice. In total, 160 proximal surfaces were assessed. Intra- and interobserver kappa coefficients were calculated. Scores obtained from the three techniques were compared with the histological gold standard using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Az values for each image type, observer and reading were compared using z-tests, with a significance level of α = 0.05.

Results

Kappa coefficients ranged from 0.883 to 0.963 for the intraoral bitewing, from 0.715 to 0.893 for the extraoral bitewing, and from 0.659 to 0.884 for the panoramic radiography. Interobserver agreements for the first and second readings for the intraoral bitewing images were between 0.717 and 0.780, the extraoral bitewing readings were between 0.569 and 0.707, and the panoramic images were between 0.477 and 0.740. The Az values for both readings of all three observers were highest for the intraoral bitewing. Az values for the extraoral bitewing images were higher than those of the panoramic images without statistical significance (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Intraoral bitewing radiography was superior to extraoral bitewing and panoramic radiography in diagnosing proximal caries of premolar and molar teeth ex vivo. Similar intra- and interobserver coefficients were calculated for extraoral bitewing and panoramic radiography.     

Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects

Objectives:

Conventional panoramic radiography, a widely used radiographic examination tool in implant treatment planning, allows evaluation of the available bone height before inserting posterior mandibular implants. Image distortion and vertical magnification due to projection geometry is well described for rotational panoramic radiographs. To assess the accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs, implants and metal balls positioned in the posterior mandible were used as radio-opaque reference objects. The reproducibility of the measuring method was assessed by the inter- and intraobserver agreements.

Methods:

Direct digital panoramic radiographs, performed using a Kodak 8000C (Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY), of 17 partially edentulous patients (10 females, 7 males, mean age 65 years) were selected from an X-ray database gathered during routine clinical evaluation of implant sites. Proprietary software and a mouse-driven calliper were used to measure the radiological length of 25 implants and 18 metal reference balls, positioned in mandibular posterior segments. The distortion ratio (DR) was calculated by dividing the radiological implant length by the implant''s real length and the radiological ball height by the ball''s real height.

Results:

Mean vertical DR was 0.99 for implants and 0.97 for balls, and was unrelated to mandibular sites, side, age, gender or observer. Inter- and intraobserver agreements were acceptable for both reference objects.

Conclusions:

Vertical measurements had acceptable accuracy and reproducibility when a software-based calibrated measurement tool was used, confirming that digital panoramic radiography can be reliably utilized to determine the pre-operative implant length in premolar and molar mandibular segments.     

Evaluation of radiolucency condition in total hip arthroplasty: a statistical comparison of the diagnostic capability of digitised image vs conventional X-ray film

This work analyses the diagnostic capability of radiographic images taken from patients with total hip arthroplasty and visualised on monitor. Images were obtained with digital acquisition of conventional X-ray films. The investigated pathology is the absence of direct contact between bone and prosthesis (radiolucency). Three senior orthopaedists defined the diagnostic “truth” on well-defined regions of interest on 22 conventional X-ray films of total hip arthroplasty, obtaining a total of 110 reference ratings. Films were digitised by use of an X-ray scanner. Four readers evaluated the X-ray images, applying conventional and monitor visualisation. To show any difference between ratings on film and ratings on monitor a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy study jointly with a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) study were performed for each reader and for all combined readings. The intra-observer reproducibility of the radiographic protocol was equal to 87 % and the inter-observer one was in the range 85–92 %. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy study together with the ROC analysis did not show significant differences between the two evaluation modes. The evaluation of radiolucency from digitised X-ray films visualised on a monitor resulted statistically comparable with the conventional evaluation on X-ray films. Received: 31 December 1998; Revised: 6 April 1999; Accepted: 30 June 1999     

CR在传统口腔曲面断层摄影中的探索和改进

目的：介绍传统口腔全景机获得数字化影像的一种简便和实用的方法,并探讨其应用的临床价值。方法：利用现有的岛津曲面断层机设备,自制盛装IP板的特制软皮套载体,在摄影时用它把IP板的软和IP板盒的硬进行互相转化,摄影完后用西门子数字成像处理系统对已摄影好的IP板进行扫描,再用Sony相机打印,从而得到口腔全景数字化影像。结果：改进技术后得到了高质量的数字化影像,随机搜集200例影像资料,进行质量评比和统计分析,其优片率达97%以上。结论：此技术可获得与其它CR一样优点众多的口腔曲面全景数字化影像,可与医院设备支持匹配,合理优化资源,且具有动态范围调节灵活、投资小、收效大等优点。     

Image processing in the digital tomosynthesis for pulmonary imaging

Digital tomosynthesis makes it possible to reconstruct multiple tomographs from digital data obtained during a single tomographic motion and permits digital processing, which adds a number of special advantages to the well-known advantages of conventional tomography. We performed digital tomosynthesis with a fluororadiographic TV unit with tomographic function which was capable of producing pulsed low-and high-energy X-rays alternately, and we studied digital image processing to improve the image clarity of the reconstructed tomographs. To identify the optimal parameters for processing image data by means of spatial frequency filtration we evaluated the spatial frequency distribution of image data in linear tomographs of the lung, and on the basis of the results of this study we developed several types of digital image processing to reduce tomographic blur and system noise, to improve visualisation of faint opacities, to reduce resistant tomographic blur as well as overall blur, and to generate low-noise bone images based on dual-energy subtraction tomosynthesis. Correspondence to: S. Sone     

Fractal analysis of the trabecular bone pattern in the presence/absence of metal artifact–producing objects: Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with panoramic and periapical radiography

Objectives:The effect of metallic objects on the fractal dimension (FD), bone area fraction (BAF) and gray scale values (GSVs) of cone-beam CT (CBCT) images was assessed. Also, FD, BAF and GSV were compared among CBCT, digital periapical and panoramic radiographies.Methods:Digital periapical and panoramic radiographs were acquired from six blocks of bovine rib. Additionally, different arrangements of titanium implants and intracanal metallic posts were created in the bone blocks and CBCT scans were taken from the different implant-root arrangements. The three radiographical modalities were compared by analysis of variance. Pairwise comparisons between the modalities were performed by the Tukey test (significance level set at 0.05).Results:Different root-implant arrangements in the CBCT images revealed no significant differences in the FD (p = 0.920), BAF and GSV values (p = 0.623). FD differed significantly among the three modalities (p < 0.001). Significant differences were found between CBCT and each of the periapical and panoramic techniques (p < 0.001), while no remarkable differences were observed in the FD of the periapical and panoramic images (p = 0.294). BAF and GSV showed significantly different results among the three radiographical techniques (p < 0.001). The difference was remarkable between CBCT and periapical (p < 0.001), CBCT and panoramic (p < 0.001) and periapical and panoramic (p = 0.008).Conclusion:Presence of titanium implants and intracanal posts does not produce different results in the fractal analysis (FA) of the CBCT images. The trabecular bone pattern is best assessed by FA of the periapical radiographs followed by the panoramic and CBCT techniques, respectively.     

Accuracy and precision of spiral CT in the assessment of neoplastic lesions associated with the mandible

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy (validity) and precision (reliability) of spiral computed tomographic (CT) images by using film- and computer graphics-based measurements of simulated neoplastic lesions associated with the mandible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four cadaver heads, each with two simulated tumors containing contrast medium positioned medial to the mandibles, were examined by using a subsecond spiral CT scanner. Data were transferred to film and to a computer workstation. With computer graphics, data were analyzed by using multiplanar reconstructed images. Linear measurements of the length, width, and depth of simulated tumors were made by two observers, twice each, on the film scans by using manual calipers and on the multiplanar reconstructed images by using computerized measurements. The soft tissues were then removed from the cadavers and the same measurements made by using the same calipers. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences between computer graphics- or film-based measurements and physical measurements (P > .05) or between inter- and intraobserver measurements (P > .05) were found. CONCLUSION: The authors found high reproducibility of measurements for all dimensions. Spiral CT allows accurate computer graphics- and film-based measurements of neoplastic lesions associated with the mandible.