389例脑胶质瘤立体定向放射治疗效果评价(英文)

目的探讨脑胶质瘤立体定向放射治疗的疗效及放疗副反应。方法从1995年6月到1998年12月,用立体定向放射治疗的方法共治疗脑胶质瘤病人389例,其中用立体定向放射外科(ster-eotactic radiosurgery,SYS)方法治疗151例,分次立体定向放射治疗(fractionated stereotatic radiotherapy,FSRT)方法治疗238例。SRS组单次周边剂量20～30Gy,靶点1～6个,平均2.48个,照射弧5～21个,平均8.45个;FSRT 组每日或隔日照射,每次周边剂量8～12Gy,共照射2～5次,靶点1～6个,平均2.53个,照射弧6～20个,平均8.25个。结果治疗结束后3个月,SRS 组完全缓解(CR)21例,占13.9%,部分缓解(PR)69例,占45.7%,稳定(SD)26例,占17.2%,进展(PD)35例,占23.2%,总有效率(PR+CR+SD)为76.8%;FSRT 组完全缓解(CR)47例,占19.7%,部分缓解(PR)114例,占47.9%,稳定(SD)49例,占20.6%,进展(PD)28例,占11.8%,总有效率(PR+CR+SD)为88.2%,两组差别有显著性(X~2=9.874,P=0.020)。全部病人的1、3、5年生存率分别为54.3%、29.3%、16.5%;SRS 组和 FSRT 组的1、3、5年生存率分别为52.3%、26.5%、11.9%和55.5%、31.1%、19.3%,两组差别没有显著性意义(X~2=2.16,P=0.1417);放射治疗的主要副反应为脑水肿,SRS组较 FSRT 组为重(X~2=4.916,P=0.027)。结论立体定向放射治疗对脑胶质瘤有较好的疗效,FSRT 与 SRS 相比,具有疗效好副作用小的优点。     

82例脑胶质瘤立体定向放射治疗的疗效观察

目的探讨立体定向放射治疗（SRT）对于脑胶质瘤患者的治疗效果。方法采用SRT治疗82例脑胶质瘤，其中初治63例，复治19例。所有患者均采用分次立体定向放射治疗（FSRT）。中位照射剂量46Gy，中位随访期为25个月（12-36个月）。结果全组局部病灶控制率为68．3％（56／82），中位生存期（MST）为12．5个月。初治和复治者MST分别为19．5和9．5个月。1年生存率为58．5％（48／82）。结论SRT可有效控制局部病灶，可作为瘤体较小、边界较清楚胶质瘤的一种安全有效治疗手段。     

389例脑胶质瘤立体定向放射治疗效果评价

Objective： To investigate the treatment effectiveness and side effects of stereotactic radiotherapy for brain glioma. Methods： From Jun. 1995 to Dec. 1998, 389 cases of brain gliomas were treated by stereotactic radiotherapy, among which 151 cases were treated by stereotactic radiosurgery （SRS） and the other 238 cases, by fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy （FSRT）. In the SRS group, the marginal tumor dose was 20 to 30 Gy （median, 2.6 Gy）. One to 6 isocenters （median, 2.48） and 5 to 21 irradiation arcs （median, 8.45） were applied. In the FSRT group, the per-fraction marginal tumor dose was 8 to 12 Gy with 1 to 6 isocenters （median, 2.53）, 6 to 20 irradiation arcs （median, 8.25） and 2-5 fractions delivered everyday or every other day. Results： Three months after treatment, the complete and partial response rates were 13.9% and 45.7% in SRS group respectively. The stable disease rate was 17.2%. The total effective rate was 76.8%. In FSRT group, the complete and partial remission rates were 19.7% and 47.9% respectively. The stable disease rate was 20.6%. The total effective rate was 88.2%. The total effective rate of FSRT group was higher than that in SRS group （X^2=9.874, P=0.020）. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rate of all patients was 54.3%, 29.3%, 16.5% respectively. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rate in SRS group and FSRT group was 52.3% vs 26.5%, 11.9% vs 55.5%, and 31.1 vs 19.3% respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups （X^2=2.16, P=0.1417）. The brain edema caused by the main radiation was more severe in the SRS group than in FSRT group （X^2=4.916, P=0.027）. Conclusion： It is effective for brain glioma to be treated by stereotactic radiotherapy. Compared with SRS, the FSRT has the advantage of good effect and less side response.     

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using gamma unit after hyperbaric oxygenation on recurrent high-grade gliomas

Background To reduce this complication and to enhance the radiation effect to hypoxic cells of high-grade gliomas, the authors performed noninvasive fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) using a Gamma unit combined with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy for the treatment of recurrent disease. Patients and methods Twenty-five consecutive patients who had previously received radiotherapy with chemotherapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas, including 14 patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) and 11 with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), underwent Gamma FSRT immediately after HBO therapy (2.5 atmospheres absolute for 60 min). The Gamma FSRT was repeatedly performed using a relocatable head cast. Median tumor volume was 8.7 cc (range, 1.7–159.3 cc), and the median total radiation dose was 22 Gy (range, 18–27 Gy) to the tumor margin in 8 fractions. Results Actuarial median survival time after FSRT was 19 months for patients with AA and 11 months for patients with GBM, which was significantly different (P = 0.012, log-rank test). Two patients underwent subsequent second FSRT for regional or remote recurrence. Seven patients (28%) underwent subsequent craniotomies and resections at a mean of 8.4 months after FSRT treatment, and 4 of them had radiation effects without viable cells and remained alive for 50–78 months. Conclusion Gamma FSRT after HBO therapy appears to confer a survival benefit for patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas and warrants further investigation.     

伽玛刀治疗肺癌脑转移瘤生存与预后分析

目的:分析伽玛刀治疗肺癌脑转移瘤患者的生存及预后影响因素。方法:回顾性分析行伽玛刀治疗的56例肺癌脑转移瘤患者,单纯SRS组22例,单纯SRT组16例,联合全脑放疗(WBRT)组9例,行伽玛刀挽救组7例,行联合WBRT挽救组2例。Log rank法单因素分析影响预后的因素。结果:全组经治疗后6月、1年生存率分别为50%、10%,中位生存期为6个月。单纯SRS、单纯SRT、SRS联合WBRT、SRS/SRT挽救组、SRS+WBRT挽救组6月生存率分别为59%、55%、40%、33%、0%,中位生存期分别为8、9、6、5、3个月（P=0.005）。其中,SRS对SRT（P=0.157）、SRS对SRS+WBRT（P=0.551）、SRT对SRS+WBRT（P=0.266）、SRS/SRT挽救组对SRS+WBRT挽救组（P=0.177）无统计学意义。单因素分析显示影响总生存率的因素有原发灶的控制情况、病理、中枢外转移情况、KPS评分、RPA分级、病灶所处位置、前期化疗、前期颅内治疗、病灶数目(P=0.000、0.013、0.002、0.000、0.000、0.000、0.043、0.011、0.037)。多因素分析显示KPS评分、原发灶控制、病理、前期颅内处理影响生存（P=0.000、0.005、0.006、0.002）。结论:用伽玛刀行单次SRS或分次SRT或与WBRT联合治疗在对生存获益上相似;KPS评分、原发灶控制情况、病理类型、前期颅内处理是影响生存的主要因素。     

Stereotactic radiosurgery versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy boost for patients with glioblastoma multiforme

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy boost (SRB) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) by comparing two different regimens, single dose or fractionated treatment. Between December 1994 and January 2000, 24 patients with GBM were treated with SRB in conjunction with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Fourteen patients (58%) were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and 10 patients (42%) with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). Median interval between EBRT and SRS or FSRT was 1.4 months (range -0.4-3.9 months). Actuarial survival rates of the entire 24 patients at one and two years following SRB were 63% and 34% respectively, with median survival time of 16 months. Variables predicting survival were age, extent of surgery, re-operation and the RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) classes based on recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). In comparison to historical controls, improved survival benefit after SRB was observed. The median survival times for the RTOG classes 4, 5, and 6 were 28.3, 10.3, and 6.0 months following EBRT+SRB, respectively. Expected values for these classes after EBRT are 11.1, 8.9, and 4.6 months, respectively. This improvement in survival was seen predominantly for the RTOG class 4. There was no difference in survival between SRS and FSRT treated groups. Late complications developed in 4 patients in the SRS group and 1 patients in the FSRT group. Our retrospective data suggest that SRB in conjunction with EBRT may improve survival in patients with GBM with median survival time of 16 months, when compared to historical controls of the RTOG data following EBRT. The addition of SRB appeared to improve the median survival most demonstrably in RTOG RPA class 4 patients. SRS and FSRT are equally effective with similar median survival, but potentially less late complications associated with FSRT. Since this is a nonrandomized study, further investigation is needed to confirm this and to determine an optimal dose/fractionation scheme.     

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy boost after post-operative radiotherapy in patients with high-grade gliomas.

PURPOSE: To determine the value and the toxicity of an additional fractionated stereotactic boost as used in the joint randomized EORTC-22972/MRC-BR10 study in patients with malignant gliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients (11 male, six female) with a high-grade glioma (two WHO III, 15 WHO IV) < or =4 cm in maximum diameter, with a good performance status (WHO > or =2), were treated with a fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) boost to 20 Gy in four fractions following partial brain irradiation to a dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. This patient group was compared with historical data in a matched-pair analysis. RESULTS: All patients were treated by conventional radiotherapy and a SRT boost (15 patients received 20 Gy and two patients 10 Gy). Acute side effects included fatigue (two), impairment of short-term memory (one) and worsening of pre-existing symptoms (one). No patient developed steroid dependence after SRT. One patient was re-operated for radiation necrosis. At a median follow-up of 25 months (9-50 months) 14 patients recurred locally. Survival was 77% at 1 year and 42% at 2 years; progression-free survival was 70% at 1 year and 35% at 2 years for all patients, respectively. Median survival for the whole patient group is 20 months. Comparison with a matched historical group showed a significantly better survival for the group treated with a stereotactic boost (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: A fractionated stereotactic boost after standard external beam radiotherapy in selected patients with high-grade glioma is feasible and well tolerated with low toxicity. Compared to historical data survival is significantly better with an additional SRT boost. However, its effectiveness has to be proven in a randomized trial.     

The role of salvage reirradiation for malignant gliomas that progress on bevacizumab

Bevacizumab and irinotecan are effective against recurrent malignant gliomas. However, at subsequent progression, patients rarely respond to a second bevacizumab-containing chemotherapeutic regimen. Salvage re-irradiation with bevacizumab for recurrent but bevacizumab naive malignant gliomas showed encouraging results. We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of 23 patients treated with either fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) after progression on an initial bevacizumab regimen. Patients were treated after re-irradiation with bevacizumab but combined with a different chemotherapy. We then compared them to another 23 patients who progressed on an initial bevacizumab + chemotherapy regimen. These patients did not receive re-irradiation but bevacizumab was continued combined with a different chemotherapy. Patients treated with FSRT/SRS/bevacizumab had a longer median progression-free period (2.6 vs. 1. 7 months, P = 0.009), longer median post FSRT/SRS treatment survival (7.2 vs. 3.3 months, P = 0.03) and higher radiographic response rate (22 vs. 0%, P = 0.049). FSRT or SRS followed by bevacizumab + chemotherapy may have a role for patients who progress on bevacizumab.     

Efficacy of fractionated stereotactic reirradiation in recurrent gliomas: long-term results in 172 patients treated in a single institution.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) performed as reirradiation in 172 patients with recurrent low- and high-grade gliomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1990 and 2004, 172 patients with recurrent gliomas were treated with FSRT as reirradiation in a single institution. Seventy-one patients suffered from WHO grade 2 gliomas. WHO grade 3 gliomas were diagnosed in 42 patients, and 59 patients were diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The median time between primary radiotherapy and reirradiation was 10 months for GBM, 32 months for WHO grade 3 tumors, and 48 months for grade 2 astrocytomas. FSRT was performed with a median dose of 36 Gy in a median fractionation of 5 x 2 Gy/wk. RESULTS: Median overall survival after primary diagnosis was 21 months for patients with GBM, 50 months for patients with WHO grade 3 gliomas, and 111 months for patients with WHO grade 2 gliomas. Histologic grading was the strongest predictor for overall survival, together with the extent of neurosurgical resection and age at primary diagnosis. Median survival after reirradiation was 8 months for patients with GBM, 16 months for patients with grade 3 tumors, and 22 months for patients with low-grade gliomas. Only time to progression and histology were significant in influencing survival after reirradiation. Progression-free survival after FSRT was 5 months for GBM, 8 months for WHO grade 3 tumors, and 12 months for low-grade gliomas. CONCLUSION: FSRT is well tolerated and may be effective in patients with recurrent gliomas. Prospective studies are warranted for further evaluation.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of intracranial gliomas

Glial neoplasms are the most common primary intracranial malignancies. Treatment of high-grade gliomas has been frustrating, with less than 5% of patients surviving 5 years after a diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated strereotactic radiotherapy (F-SRT) provide means to either escalate the dose in primary treatment or to palliate recurrences. Because of their lower alpha/beta ratios and more focal nature, low-grade gliomas (LGG) are more attractive targets for stereotactically focused radiation. Results of available phase I-II data are reviewed for both low and high-grade gliomas. In the case of high-grade gliomas disappointing preliminary phase III data from RTOG 93-05 are discussed. Toxicity of SRS is discussed. Acute treatment toxicity of significance is unusual and generally self-limited. Occasionally an exacerbation of existing symptoms occurs. Late complications attributable to SRS are usually defined as necrosis within the treatment volume. The rate of necrosis can be hard to define in high-grade gliomas as tumor cells are often present in surgical specimens. New strategies in the application of stereotactic radiation are touched upon, these include: changes in planning and fractionation, concurrent use of chemotherapy, use of radiation modifiers and biologic agents. After reviewing the current data for high-grade gliomas, it appears that any apparent improvement in outcome seen in phase I-II trials is attributable to patient selection. The best evidence available does not support the use of SRS for primary high-grade gliomas. The somewhat limited experience in LGG also indicates a lack of benefit for patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery or F-SRT. For a very select group of patients with small recurrent lesions, F-SRT may represent a safe, reasonable treatment.     

立体定向放射治疗肺癌脑转移疗效分析

目的探讨不同放射治疗方法对肺癌脑转移的疗效.方法176例由病理学证实的肺癌脑转移患者分为4组:单纯全脑放疗(WBRT)组、全脑放疗加立体定向放射外科(WBRT SRS)组、单纯立体定向放射治疗(SRT)组、全脑放疗加立体定向放射治疗(WBRT SRT)组.SRS治疗单次靶区平均周边剂量8～20Gy,总剂量20～32Gy;SRT治疗单次靶区平均周边剂量2～5Gy,总剂量25～60Gy;WBRT1.8～2Gy/次,总剂量30～40Gy.结果四组的局部控制率分别为47.0%、87.7%、86.5%和78.0%;中位生存期分别为5.0,11.0,11.5和10.0个月;局部无进展生存期分别为3.33,8.33,9.33和7.67个月;颅脑无新病灶生存期分别为4.11,8.57,9.03和6.12个月.在死因分析中,WBRT组死于脑转移的比率为57.6%,较其他三组高.而WBRT SRS组的晚期放射反应的发生率为12.2%,较其他组高.结论肺癌单发脑转移瘤患者的最佳治疗方式是单纯立体定向放射治疗,治疗失败后再行挽救性全脑照射或立体定向放疗.对于多发脑转移,全脑放疗加立体定向放射治疗(WBRT SRT)在提高生存率以及减少并发症方面优于其他治疗方法.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: comparison of efficacy and toxicity in 260 patients with brain metastases

We retrospectively evaluated and compared the efficacy and the toxicity profile of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for the treatment of patients with brain metastases (BM). Between 2000 and 2009, 260 patients with 1-3 BM were treated using either SRS (median dose 20 Gy; n = 138) or two different FSRT dose concepts: 7 × 5 Gy (n = 61) or 10 × 4 Gy (n = 61). The median survival for SRS, 7 × 5 Gy and 10 × 4 Gy was 8, 7 and 10 months (p = 0.575), respectively, and the overall survival (OS) was 9 months. Follow-up imaging data were available in 214 of the 260 patients. The 1-year local progression-free survival (LPFS) was 73, 75 and 71 %, respectively (p = 0.191). After a mean follow-up of 28 months (range: 2.1-77 months), the rate of complete remission, partial remission, stable disease and progressive disease were 29, 40, 21 and 10 %, respectively. On multivariate analysis, RPA class I was associated with better OS and regional progression-free survival (both p < 0.001). SRS was associated with a higher toxicity rate (grade I-III) compared to the 7 × 5 Gy and 10 × 4 Gy groups (14 vs. 6 vs. 2 %, respectively; p = 0.01). Although FSRT was used for large lesions and/or lesions near critical structures, the LPFS was comparable to SRS. Importantly, FSRT presented low toxicity and appears to be an effective and safe treatment for BM not amenable to SRS. The 10 × 4 Gy fractionation scheme warrants further investigation due to its efficacy and safe toxicity profile.     

Progression of hearing loss after LINAC-based stereotactic radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma is associated with cochlear dose,not with pre-treatment hearing level

Background

Although stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for vestibular schwannoma has demonstrated excellent local control rates, hearing deterioration is often reported after treatment. We therefore wished to assess the change in hearing loss after SRT and to determine which patient, tumor and treatment-related factors influence deterioration.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed progression of hearing loss in patients with vestibular schwannoma who had received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) as a primary treatment between 2000 and 2014. SRS had been delivered as a single fraction of 12?Gy, and patients treated with FSRT had received 30 fractions of 1.8?Gy. To compare the effects of SRS and FSRT, we converted cochlear doses into EQD₂. Primary outcomes were loss of functional hearing, Gardner Robertson (GR) classes I and II, and loss of baseline hearing class. These events were used in Kaplan Meier plots and Cox regression. We also calculated the rate of change in Pure Tone Average (PTA) in dB per month elapsed after radiation—a measure we use in linear regression—to assess the associations between the rate of change in PTA and age, pre-treatment hearing level, tumor size, dose scheme, cochlear dose, and time elapsed after treatment (time-to-first-audiogram).

Results

The median follow-up was 36?months for 67 SRS patients and 63?months for 27 FSRT patients. Multivariate Cox regression and in linear regression both showed that the cochlear V90 was significantly associated with the progression of hearing loss. But although pre-treatment PTA correlated with rate of change in Cox regression, it did not correlate in linear regression. The time-to-first-audiogram was also significantly associated, indicating time dependency of the rate of change. None of the analysis showed a significant difference between dose schemes.

Conclusions

We found no significant difference between SRS and FSRT. As the deterioration in hearing after radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma was associated with the cochlea V90, restricting the V90 may reduce progression of hearing loss. The association between loss of functional hearing and baseline PTA seems to be biased by the use of a categorized variable for hearing loss.

     

Audiologic and treatment outcomes after linear accelerator-based stereotactic irradiation for acoustic neuroma

PURPOSE: Although surgical excision is the traditional treatment modality for acoustic neuroma, radiotherapy (RT) is gaining momentum as an alternative. This is particularly evident in patients with useful hearing, in whom fractionated RT offers the potential for hearing preservation. Our objective was to determine the disease control, hearing preservation (via audiograms), and toxicity rates after linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiation for acoustic neuroma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 72 acoustic neuroma patients underwent stereotactic irradiation and had at least 6 months of follow-up between October 1997 and March 2002. Of these, 45 received single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and 27 received fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Before treatment, all SRS patients were functionally deaf and 23 of 25 SRT patients had useful hearing in the affected ear. The minimal peripheral dose was 12 Gy and 45 Gy in all SRS and SRT patients, respectively. Tumor control, toxicity, and hearing preservation were recorded. RESULTS: The median follow-up in the SRS and SRT groups was 27 and 26 months, respectively. No tumor progression was seen after SRS and SRT. On the basis of the audiogram criteria, the 1-year and 2-year hearing preservation rate was 85% and 57%, respectively. The mean pre- and post-SRT speech recognition threshold was 20 and 38 dB, respectively. The mean proportion of pre- and post-SRT speech discrimination was 91% and 59%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic RT achieves good local control, with acceptable toxicity. RT fractionation appears to provide encouraging rates of hearing preservation.     

Clinical outcomes of patients treated with a second course of stereotactic radiosurgery for locally or regionally recurrent brain metastases after prior stereotactic radiosurgery

Patients with metastatic disease are living longer and may be confronted with locally or regionally recurrent brain metastases (BM) after prior stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). This study analyzes outcomes in patients without prior whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) who were treated with a second course of SRS/FSRT for locally or regionally recurrent BM. We identified 32 patients at our institution who were treated with a second course of SRS/FSRT after initial SRS/FSRT for newly diagnosed BM. We report clinical outcomes including local control, survival, and toxicities. Control rates and survival were calculated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and the multivariate proportional hazards model. The Kaplan–Meier estimate of local control at 6 months was 77 % for targets treated by a second course of SRS/FSRT with 11/71 (15 %) targets experiencing local failure. Multivariate analysis shows that upon re-treatment, local recurrences were more likely to fail than regional recurrences (OR 8.8, p = 0.02). Median survival for all patients from first SRS/FSRT was 14.6 months (5.3–72.2 months) and 7.9 months (0.7–61.1 months) from second SRS/FSRT. Thirty-eight percent of patients ultimately received WBRT as salvage therapy after the second SRS/FSRT. Seventy-one percent of patients died without active neurologic symptoms. The present study demonstrates that the majority of patients who progress after SRS/FSRT for newly diagnosed BM are candidates for salvage SRS/FSRT. By reserving WBRT for later salvage, we believe that a significant proportion of patients can avoid WBRT all together, thus putting fewer patients at risk for neurocognitive toxicity.     

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of optic pathway gliomas: tolerance and long-term outcome

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of fractionated stereotactically guided radiotherapy (FSRT) in the management of optic glioma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen patients with optic pathway gliomas were treated with FSRT at our institution between 1990 and 2003. A median target dose of 52.2 Gy (range, 45.2-57.6 Gy) was applied using a median fractionation of 5 fractions of 1.8 Gy weekly using a linear accelerator. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 97 months (range, 8-151 months). Of the 15 patients, 1 died of tumor progression during the follow-up period. The progression-free survival rate at 3 and 5 years was 92% and 72%, respectively. The median overall survival after FSRT was 90 months (range, 8-151 months). The 5-year survival rate after FSRT was 90%. We did not observe secondary malignancies. CONCLUSION: Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy was safe and well tolerated in all patients. The good tumor control and the potential of sparing normal brain tissue, especially the pituitary gland in lesions involving the optic chiasm, permit effective treatment of patients with optic nerve gliomas. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the incidence of late effects fully.     

SRT联合拉帕替尼治疗HER2阳性乳腺癌脑转移疗效及预后分析

目的 探讨立体定向放射治疗(Stereotactic radiotherapy,SRT)联合拉帕替尼治疗HER2阳性乳腺癌脑转移的疗效及预后。方法 回顾性分析91例HER2阳性乳腺癌脑转移患者接受拉帕替尼靶向治疗的同时接受全脑放疗或SRT的情况,其中42例患者接受SRT的同时进行拉帕替尼联合卡培他滨治疗(SRT组),另外49例患者采用全脑放疗同时进行拉帕替尼联合卡培他滨治疗(全脑放疗组)。评价其疗效和毒性,定期随访,并行多因素Cox回归分析其预后相关因素。结果 放疗结束后1月SRT组脑部病灶客观缓解率为92.86%(39/42),全脑放疗组客观缓解率为77.55%(38/49),SRT组优于全脑放疗组(χ²=4.070,P=0.044)。SRT组和全脑组12个月受照射肿瘤病灶无进展生存率分别为95.20%及83.10%, SRT组优于全脑放疗组(χ²=10.851,P=0.001)。 SRT组无颅内转移生存率与全脑放疗组无统计学差异(P＞0.05)。SRT组和全脑放疗组1年生存率分别为85.70%和69.40%,2年生存率分别为66.70%和55.10%,两组中位生存期分别为31.56个月和25.00个月,SRT组优于全脑放疗组(P=0.002)。多因素Cox回归分析结果表明无颅外转移(HR=0.527,95% CI:0.290~0.957,P=0.035),颅内病灶≤3个(HR=2.457,95% CI:1.223~4.933,P=0.012),放疗方式SRT(HR=1.746,95% CI:1.055~2.888,P=0.030)是HER2阳性乳腺癌脑转移放疗预后的独立保护因素。结论 SRT联合拉帕替尼在局部控制率以及生存率上优于全脑放疗联合拉帕替尼。颅内病灶个数少、无颅外转移灶和放疗方式是HER2阳性乳腺癌脑转移治疗的良好预后因素。     

Salvage reirradiation for recurrent glioblastoma with radiosurgery: radiographic response and improved survival

Purpose To determine the radiographic and clinical efficacy of stereotactic single dose radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) as salvage therapy for glioblastoma (GBM) at recurrence. Methods Thirty-six patients with pathologically proven recurrent GBM were treated with salvage reirradiation by either SRS or FSRT between March of 2001 and August of 2006. Thirty-one patients had an initial diagnosis of GBM. Five patients had a malignant transformation. All patients had received radiotherapy with a dose of 50–60 Gy, a median 13.6 months prior to reirradiation (range: 0.8–119 months). At the time of recurrence, 26 patients were treated with SRS with a median dose of 18 Gy (range: 12–20 Gy). FSRT was performed in ten patients with a dose of 36 Gy in six fractions, twice weekly. Follow-up included MRI and clinical examination every 2 months. Results Median survival time after SRS was 8.5 months, compared to 7.4 months after FSRT (P = 0.81). Of 26 patients treated with SRS, radiographic tumor response or stable disease was observed in eight (35%) patients and tumor progression was seen in 18 (65%) patients. Of 10 patients treated by FSRT, radiographic tumor response or stable disease was observed in four (40%) patients and tumor progression was observed in four (40%) patients (two lost to follow-up). Patients who responded to treatment had statistically improved survival compared to non-responders, with median survival of 15.8 vs. 7.3 months (P < 0.05). Conclusion Salvage reirradiation with SRS or FSRT for recurrent GBM results in radiographic response in a proportion of patients. Survival was significantly improved among patients who either responded or had stable disease after salvage reirradiation, compared to non-responders. Further study is warranted to investigate the method and time of reirradiation for recurrent GBM.     

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma (VS): comparison between cystic-type and solid-type VS

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness and complications of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for cystic-type vestibular schwannoma (VS) with those of solid-type VS.

Methods and Materials: In 65 patients treated with fractionated SRT between 1991 and 1999, 20 were diagnosed with cystic VS, in which at least one-third of the tumor volume was a cystic component on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 45 were diagnosed with solid VS. Thirty-six Gy to 50 Gy in 20–25 fractions was administered to the isocenter and approximately 80% of the periphery of the tumor. All cystic and solid components were included in the gross tumor volume. The mean follow-up period was 37 months, ranging from 6 to 97 months.

Results: The actuarial 3-year rate of no episode of enlargement greater than 2.0 mm was 55% for cystic-type and 75% for solid-type VS; the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.023). The actuarial 3-year tumor-reduction (reduction in tumor size greater than 2.0 mm) rates were 93% and 31%, respectively (p = 0.0006). The overall actuarial tumor control rate (no tumor growth greater than 2.0 mm after 2 years or no requirement of salvage surgery) was 92% at 5 years in 44 patients with a follow-up period of 2 or more years. There was no difference in the class hearing preservation rate between cystic VS and solid VS. No permanent trigeminal or facial nerve palsy was observed in either group.

Conclusion: Transient tumor enlargement occurs in cystic VS more frequently than in solid-type VS, but the subsequent tumor-reduction rate in cystic VS is better.     

Dose to the intracranial arteries in stereotactic and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for skull base tumors

PURPOSE: To examine retrospectively the maximum dose to the large skull base/intracranial arteries in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), because of the potential risk of perfusion disturbances. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Overall, 56 patients with tumors adjacent to at least one major artery were analyzed. Our strategy was to perform FSRT with these criteria: 1.8 Gy per fraction, planning target volume (PTV) enclosed by the 95% isodose, maximum dose 107%. Dose limits were applied to established organs at risk, but not the vessels. If FSRT planning failed to meet any of these criteria, IMRT was planned with the same objectives. RESULTS: In 31 patients (median PTV, 23 cm3), the FSRT plan fulfilled all criteria. No artery received a dose > or =105%. Twenty-five patients (median PTV, 39 cm3) needed IMRT planning. In 11 of 25 patients (median PTV, 85 cm3), no plan satisfying all our criteria could be calculated. Only in this group, moderately increased maximum vessel doses were observed (106-110%, n = 7, median PTV, 121 cm3). The median PTV dose gradient was 29% (significantly different from the 14 patients with satisfactory IMRT plans). Three of the four patients in this group had paranasal sinus tumors. CONCLUSION: The doses to the major arteries should be calculated in IMRT planning for critical tumor locations if a dose gradient >13% within the PTV can not be avoided because the PTV is large or includes air cavities.