Antiplatelet activity during coadministration of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine and aspirin in male smokers: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial

Depression is associated with an increased incidence of vascular events and develops after stroke and myocardial infarction. Beside potential clinical outcome benefits of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for vascular diseases, bleeding events were reported. We investigated whether paroxetine and aspirin synergistically inhibit platelet function. Paroxetine (20 mg/d) was administered over 18 days to 20 men in a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover design. Aspirin (100 mg/d) was coadministered within the last 4 study days. Platelet function was assessed by the platelet function analyzer and by flow cytometry. Paroxetine prolonged epinephrine-dependent predictive index within 14 days (P<.02). Aspirin enhanced the predictive index (P<.004 vs baseline and P>.05 between periods). A trend toward decreased thrombin receptor-activating peptide-induced CD62P expression after paroxetine was further enhanced by aspirin treatment (P>.05 between periods). The combination of paroxetine and aspirin did not further inhibit platelet plug formation under high shear stress in male smokers.     

N-methyl-citalopram: A quaternary selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor

We describe the synthesis and the pharmacological characterization of a new quaternary selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) N-methyl-citalopram (NMC) with periphery restricted action due to its inability to cross the blood brain barrier. NMC recognized and blocked the human platelet serotonin transporter (SERT) with similar affinity to that of citalopram as was evident from competition binding studies with [³H]citalopram and uptake studies with [³H]5-HT. In contrast, the affinity of NMC to rat brain SERT was 10-fold lower than its parent compound citalopram. Similarly to citalopram, NMC did not inhibit dopamine and noradrenaline uptake in rat brain synaptosomes at 10⁻⁷ M as well as [³H]ketanserin binding to rat brain membranes at 10⁻⁵ M, demonstrating its SSRI profile. A comparison of radioactivity retained in perfused mice brain following in vivo intraperitoneal injections of tritium-labeled NMC or citalopram showed that unlike citalopram, NMC did not penetrate the brain. Taken together, our observations suggest that N-methyl-citalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor that does not penetrate the mouse brain. Epidemiological studies have suggested that chronic use of SSRI drugs may confer a protective effect against myocardial infarction (MI) apparently reflecting reduced platelet aggregation secondary to reduced platelet serotonin levels. N-methyl-citalopram may therefore have a potential as a new anti-platelet drug that does not cross the blood brain barrier and is thus devoid of the adverse CNS effects of SSRI drugs.     

Gender differences in routine treatment of depressed outpatients with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline

Gender is known to have an influence on medical treatment and the prescribing and outcome of drug treatment. This has also been suggested for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). To examine sex differences in the treatment with the SSRI sertraline in routine treatment of depression, data from a 6-month prospective drug utilization observation study on 3,858 women and 1,594 men were analysed for gender differences. Compared to men, women were more often treated by a general practitioner, were somewhat older, had a later onset of illness, were more likely to suffer from a recurrent rather than a first episode of depression, had been treated for depression before, and showed more anxious and less neurasthenic or retarded syndromes. There was no difference regarding duration of the present episode or severity of illness. The mean prescribed dose of sertraline was marginally lower for females compared to males (45.5 versus 46.5 mg/day) with no difference in the rate of psychoactive concomitant medication (6.76% versus 6.80%). There was no difference in side-effects, treatment termination or treatment response.     

Lamotrigine augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitors in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

The present 16-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial had the aim to explore the efficacy of lamotrigine add-on pharmacotherapy on clinical symptomatology and cognitive functioning in a sample of patients with treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) receiving serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs). After clinical and neurocognitive assessments, patients were randomly allocated to receive, in a double-blind design, 100 mg/day of lamotrigine or a placebo. A final sample of 33 patients completed the study. The results obtained indicate that lamotrigine added to stable SRI treatment substantially improved obsessive-compulsive (Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale: obsessions, p < 0.0001; compulsions, p < 0.0001; total score, p < 0.0001), and affective symptoms (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression p < 0.0001). Regarding cognitive functions, improvement was observed only in Semantic Fluency (p = 0.004). The findings provide evidence that lamotrigine augmentation of SRI treatment is well tolerated and may be proposed as an effective therapeutic strategy to improve outcome in treatment-resistant OCD.     

Influence of citalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, on oesophageal hypersensitivity: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Background Tricyclic antidepressants, which have multiple pharmacological influences, have a therapeutic effect in non-cardiac chest pain, but selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have a single pharmacological effect. Aim To evaluate the acute effect of citalopram on oesophageal hypersensitivity. Methods On two separate occasions, 10 healthy subjects (seven men, mean age 25 years) with established oesophageal hypersensitivity, underwent oesophageal manometry with evaluation of mechanical and chemical sensitivity. Subjects received placebo or citalopram 20 mg i.v. in a randomized, crossover, double-blind fashion. Results Citalopram did not alter oesophageal motility. Citalopram significantly increased the threshold inducing first perception (4.6+/-0.3 vs. 6.7+/-0.4 mL, P<0.005) and discomfort (8.6+/-0.4 vs. 9.9+/-0.6 mL, P<0.01) during balloon distention. It also significantly prolonged the acid perfusion time to induce perception of heartburn (6.0+/-0.9 vs. 10.7+/-0.6 min, P<0.005) and discomfort (12.2+/-0.8 vs. 16.7+/-0.7 mL, P<0.001). Seven subjects experienced a retrosternal sensation during edrophonium provocation with placebo, and this was reduced to two of 10 after citalopram (P=0.02). Conclusions Acute administration of citalopram significantly lowers chemical and mechanical oesophageal sensitivity in oesophageal hypersensitivity, without altering the motility.     

Safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment in recovering stroke patients

Introduction: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely used for psychiatric complications after stroke. Studies have indicated additional effects, and SSRIs could potentially be used as enhancers of stroke recovery. However, beneficial effects should be weighed against potential adverse effects. In particular, the possible association with cerebrovascular events has raised concern.

Areas covered: We review the literature on cerebrovascular events associated with SSRI treatment after stroke. The possible beneficial effects of SSRI treatment for stroke recovery and survival, and potential safety concerns, are discussed.

Expert opinion: Evidence suggests that SSRIs may enhance stroke recovery. Most studies on cerebrovascular risk are from non-stroke populations and little is known about recurrent events and mortality post-stroke. In non-stroke populations treatment has been associated with increased risk of intracerebral and intracranial hemorrhage; however the absolute risk is low. The association between SSRIs and ischemic stroke is less clear. Randomized stroke trials indicate that treatment is safe and well tolerated, and the most common side effects are often benign and transient. The trials are small however and not powered to detect potential differences in cerebrovascular events. We await several ongoing large randomized trials before SSRIs can be recommended as a routine pharmacotherapy in stroke recovery.     

Pharmacogenetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor response: a 6-month follow-up

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the association between some genetic factors and short-term antidepressant outcome. In the present paper we investigated the same gene variants in a prospective 6-months naturalistic follow-up. METHODS: The sample included 185 inpatients affected by recurrent major depression consecutively admitted to the Psychiatric Inpatient Unit of San Raffaele Hospital from 1998 to 2003 and prospectively followed for 6 months after their recovery. All the patients were undertaking continuation therapy. The functional polymorphism in the upstream regulatory region of the serotonin transporter gene (SERTPR), the tryptophan hydroxylase A218C substitution, a VNTR polymorphism located 1.2 kb upstream of the monoamine oxidase-A coding sequences, the CLOCK gene T3111C and the PER3exon15 gene T1940G substitutions were analysed, using PCR-based techniques. RESULTS: No association was found between clinical variables and relapses; subjects showing TT genotype at CLOCK gene tended to relapse within 6 months after recovery more than TC and CC subjects taken together. A non-significant tendency of SERTPR*s/s subjects to a minor frequency of relapse was also observed. CONCLUSION: Some subjects showing remission after acute treatment relapsed within 6 months, despite undertaking a maintenance treatment; the causes could be heterogeneous, but CLOCK gene variants may influence the outcome.     

Venlafaxine in social phobia: a study in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor non-responders.

The study aimed to evaluate the clinical response to venlafaxine in social phobia in 12 patients who were non-responders to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and to assess how the response could be influenced by the comorbidity in Axis II with avoidant personality disorder (APD). The duration of the study was of 15 weeks using open flexible doses regimen in individuals with or without concomitant APD. The venlafaxine dose ranged from 112.5 mg/day to 187.5 mg/day. Venlafaxine improves social phobia and/or APD symptomatology, as demonstrated by decreasing Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale total scores (P < 0.05). In fact, venlafaxine significantly reduced the avoidant behaviour and specific sociophobic aspects, while notably improving the depression dimension and the basic anxiety symptoms. With regard to tolerability, the profile of venlafaxine was satisfactory with the main side-effects being nausea, headache and anxiety.     

8-week, single-blind, randomized trial comparing risperidone versus olanzapine augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitors in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder.

The aim of the present pilot study was to investigate in a single-blind manner, over a period of 8 weeks, the comparative efficacy and tolerability of risperidone versus olanzapine addition in the treatment of OCD patients who did not show a >or=35% decrease in the YBOCS score after 16-week SRI treatment (defined as resistant). The study consisted of two different phases: a 16-week open-label prospective phase to ascertain resistance to SRI treatment and an 8-week single-blind addition phase for resistant subjects only. Ninety-six subjects with DSM-IV OCD (YBOCS>or=16) entered the open-label prospective phase; at the end of the 16-week period, 50 (52%) were judged to be resistant and were randomized to receive risperidone (1 to 3 mg/d) or olanzapine (2.5 to 10 mg/d) addition for 8 weeks. Overall, patients in both groups responded significantly, without differences between the two treatment groups; although no differences emerged for the proportion of patients reporting at least an adverse event, the profiles of adverse experiences differed significantly, being risperidone associated with amenorrhoea and olanzapine with weight gain.     

选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂撤药综合征42例的临床分析

目的:探讨选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)撤药综合征的临床特点、诱发因素及预防。方法:回顾性调查42例SSRI撤综合征的临床症状,诱发因素及处理。结果:42例撤药综合征以头晕、恶心、呕吐、头痛、感觉异常、心情低落、失眠、焦虑、激越等症状为主。撤药症状发生于停药后的1～5d,持续1～7d。42例中应用帕罗西汀27例,舍曲林6例,西酞普兰6例,氟西汀3例。诱发因素:自行突然停药30例,漏服6例,减药4例,换药2例。结论:骤停SSRI可引起撤药综合征,以帕罗西汀较易发生,应引起临床上重视。缓慢减量或使用半衰期较长的SSRI可预防撤药综合征的发生。     

Effect of aripiprazole augmentation of serotonin reuptake inhibitors or clomipramine in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Based on the evidence that aripiprazole added to serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) or clomipramine in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has reported promising results, the present 16-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial had the aim to explore the efficacy of aripiprazole add-on pharmacotherapy on clinical symptoms and cognitive functioning in a sample of treatment-resistant OCD patients receiving SRIs. After clinical and neurocognitive assessments, patients were randomly allocated to receive, in a double-blind design, 15 mg/d of aripiprazole or a placebo. A final sample of 30 patients completed the study. The results obtained indicate that aripiprazole added to stable SRI treatment substantially improved obsessive-compulsive symptoms as measured by changes on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale total score and subscores (obsessions, P = 0.007; compulsions, P = 0.001; total score, P < 0.0001). Regarding cognitive functions, improvement was observed in some explored areas, such as attentional resistance to interference (Stroop score, P = 0.001) and executive functioning (perseverative errors, P = 0.015). The findings provide evidence that aripiprazole augmentation of SRIs/clomipramine treatment is well tolerated and may be proposed as an effective therapeutic strategy to improve outcome in treatment-resistant OCD.     

Duloxetine-bupropion combination for treatment-resistant atypical depression: A double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled trial

The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of combined bupropion versus placebo using duloxetine as active reference drug, in patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of major depression with atypical features and a history of treatment resistance, were evaluated in this preliminary six-week study. Patients (n=46) had a baseline Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) ≥14 and were randomly assigned to 150/300 mg/day bupropion vs. placebo, which was added to 60 to 120 mg/day duloxetine depending on baseline depression severity. Atypical features of depression were assessed using the additional eight-item module of the Structured Interview Guide for the HAM-D with the Atypical Depression Supplement. By week 6, only five (21.7%) patients receiving duloxetine+placebo vs. six (26.1%) patients on the bupropion combination achieved response. No significant difference in final HAM-D scores between the two groups was observed between those patients achieving response. The presence of a higher number of atypical features significantly predicted non-response, with the relevant binary logistic regression model correctly classifying 17 out 22 (77.3%) of non-responders [Exp(B)=0.294; p=0.016] vs. 17 out 23 (73.9%) [Exp(B)=0.353; p=0.028] non-responder cases in the “+placebo” and “+bupropion” groups, respectively. In those patients receiving bupropion, treatment-emergent adverse events leading to withdrawal were more common among those receiving lower doses of the combination drug, and no life-threating dangers were noted. Additional studies, including an adequate course of duloxetine trial, are nonetheless aimed to allow a firm conclusion about the usefulness of the combination of duloxetine and bupropion for treatment-resistant cases of major depression with atypical features.     

Venlafaxine extended release versus citalopram in patients with depression unresponsive to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor

Findings from the National Institute of Mental Health's Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression trial indicate that approximately 50% of patients with major depressive disorder do not experience a treatment response after adequate first-line treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). This study was designed to test the hypothesis that, after treatment failure with an SSRI, switching to venlafaxine extended release (ER) would offer advantages over switching to another SSRI, citalopram. The objectives of this trial were to compare the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine ER and citalopram in the treatment of moderate-to-severe depression in patients who did not experience a treatment response to an SSRI other than citalopram and to investigate the effects of severity of depression by categorizing treatment groups according to baseline severity. This was a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study. Participants were adult outpatients who, following 8 weeks of monotherapy with an adequate dosing regimen of an SSRI other than citalopram and had not responded, met the diagnostic criteria for depression as described in the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, and had a score > or =20 on the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D21). After a 7-day screening period, patients were randomly assigned to receive venlafaxine ER 75 mg/day or citalopram 20 mg/day for the first 2 weeks. Doses could be increased every 2 weeks through week 6. Treatment lasted 12 weeks and was followed by a 1-week tapering period. Maximum dosages were venlafaxine ER 300 mg/day or citalopram 60 mg/day. The primary end point was the final on-therapy total HAM-D21 score. To investigate the treatment effects of the severity of depression on efficacy, a subgroup analysis was performed for baseline HAM-D21 total score < or =31 and >31. The analyses for HAM-D21, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impressions - Severity (CGI-S), and Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement scores were based on intent-to-treat (ITT) population, for both the primary analysis and subgroup analysis according to baseline HAM-D21 total scores < or =31 or >31. Safety assessments included the recording of adverse events (AEs). A total of 406 patients (200 venlafaxine ER, 206 citalopram) were randomly assigned and 396 patients were included in the ITT population (194 venlafaxine ER, 202 citalopram). Treatment groups were similar in terms of demographics and baseline psychiatric assessments. Two hundred and eighty-four patients (137 venlafaxine ER, 147 citalopram) were present in the ITT population with a baseline HAM-D21 total score < or =31 and 112 patients (57 venlafaxine ER, 55 citalopram) in the >31 group. In the primary analysis, there was no statistical difference between groups. The group with a baseline HAM-D21 total score of 20-31 did not differ significantly in any efficacy parameters. In the group with a baseline HAM-D21 total score >31, the venlafaxine ER group differed significantly from the citalopram group on the primary end point HAM-D21 total score (P=0.0121). The secondary end point CGI-S score was statistically significant (P=0.0359), although the MADRS total score (P=0.0930) was not. AEs were reported by 57.8 and 63.4% of venlafaxine ER and citalopram patients, respectively. Overall discontinuation rates were 24.5% for venlafaxine ER and 20.9% for citalopram. Discontinuation rates owing to an AE as a primary or secondary reason were 5.5% for venlafaxine ER and 5.3% for citalopram. Overall, venlafaxine ER and citalopram showed similar efficacy in patients who had an inadequate response to an SSRI. In the subset of more severely depressed patients, venlafaxine ER was significantly more effective on a number of efficacy measures. Patients who remain severely depressed following treatment with an SSRI may gain more benefit from the dual-action drug venlafaxine, rather than switching to another SSRI.     

Effect of buspirone on sexual dysfunction in depressed patients treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

To evaluate the possible influence of buspirone on sexual dysfunction in depressed patients treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), we analyzed data from a placebo-controlled trial designed to explore the efficacy of buspirone as add-on treatment for patients not responding to an SSRI alone. At baseline, all patients met the criteria for a major depressive episode according to DSM-IV and had received citalopram or paroxetine during a minimum of 4 weeks without responding to the treatment. Buspirone (flexible dosage, 20-60 mg/day) or placebo was added to the SSRI for 4 weeks; the mean daily dose of buspirone at endpoint was 48.5 mg (SD = 1.0). Sexual dysfunction was evaluated using a structured interview. Before starting medication with buspirone or placebo, 40% (47 of 117) reported at least one kind of sexual dysfunction (decreased libido, ejaculatory dysfunction, orgasmic dysfunction). During the 4 weeks of treatment, approximately 58% of subjects treated with buspirone reported an improvement with respect to sexual function; in the placebo group, the response rate was 30%. The difference between placebo and active drug treatment was more pronounced in women than in men. The response was obvious during the first week, with no further improvement during the course of the study. It is suggested that the effect of buspirone on sexual dysfunction is a result of a reversal of SSRI-induced sexual side effects rather than of an antidepressant effect of the drug.     

Serum levels and cardiovascular effects of tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in depressed patients

Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are used to treat depression. Whereas cardiovascular effects have occasionally been reported during controlled studies with SSRIs, TCA treatment poses a well-known problem in this respect. To investigate the putative correlation between antidepressant dose or serum levels and adverse effects, the authors devised a naturalistic study to evaluate the tricyclic antidepressants' and SSRIs' effect on the cardiovascular system. The authors also compared antidepressant serum levels to adverse effects. Inpatients treated with TCAs or SSRIs were included; an electrocardiogram (ECG) and a Schellong test were carried out on the day patients entered the hospital and during steady-state treatment with antidepressant drugs when blood was drawn for therapeutic drug monitoring. The patient population consisted of 114 acutely depressed patients; 81 patients were treated with TCAs and 33 with SSRIs. The TCAs comprised amitriptyline (n = 43), clomipramine (n = 11), doxepin (n = 19) and imipramine (n = 8); the SSRIs comprised fluvoxamine (n = 14) and paroxetine (n = 19). In TCA-treated patients, the authors observed the same type of abnormalities in conduction and orthostatic hypotension as had been observed earlier. The authors also observed cases of first-degree atrioventricular block, prolonged QTc interval, and orthostatic hypotension in SSRI-treated patients. Thus SSRIs also appear to affect the cardiovascular system, which might pose a problem for patients with preexisting conduction disease. The authors observed a strong correlation between the decrease in systolic pressure and antidepressant serum concentration (except for clomipramine and paroxetine), suggesting that antidepressant serum level is a better correlate than dose.     

Short-term testosterone augmentation in male schizophrenics: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Although there are few studies on the treatment of schizophrenia with testosterone, several indirect findings have suggested testosterone as a possible treatment modality for schizophrenia. To explore the therapeutic effect of testosterone augmentation of antipsychotic medication on symptoms in male patients with schizophrenia, the authors performed a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial on 30 schizophrenic men, using either 5 g of 1% testosterone gel (Testogel; Besins Iscovesco, Paris, France) or a placebo added to a fixed dosage of antipsychotic medication over a period of 4 weeks with a 2-week washout period. In addition, to get additional information about the involvement of these reproductive hormones after testosterone augmentation, the authors evaluated several hormones such as total testosterone, free testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol, and prolactin. Results indicated a significant improvement of negative symptoms in both the last observation carried forward and the completer analyses and a nonsignificant trend for the improvement of depressive symptoms in completers. There were no significant changes in serum hormone levels except total and free testosterone. The findings of this study suggest that testosterone augmentation may be a potential therapeutic strategy in patients with schizophrenia.