世界卫生组织残疾态度量表中文版的信度、效度分析**

背景：为客观科学地评价人们对待残疾和残疾人的态度,需研制出一份专门针对残疾和残疾人的态度量表,以了解人们对待残疾人的态度及其影响因素。 目的：考核世界卫生组织残疾态度量表中文版的信度和效度。 方法：采用全球多中心同步研究的方法研制世界卫生组织残疾态度量表。通过多阶段分层整群随机抽样抽取1 037名残疾人、507名残疾人照顾者及354名正常人,对其进行问卷调查。对其中109名残疾人间隔1周进行量表的重复测量。采用克朗巴赫α系数评价量表的内部一致性信度,通过前后2次测量各方面得分的相关系数以及配对检验来考察量表的重测信度,采用探索性因子分析评价量表的结构效度。 结果与结论：共回收残疾人问卷1 000份、残疾人照顾者问卷507份、正常人问卷354份。量表回收率大于95.0%,条目缺失率低于1.10%;量表各个方面的克朗巴赫α系数为0.588~0.837;重复测量前后得分差异无显著性意义;不同人群对待残疾的态度各有不同,因子分析结果表明量表反映出的内在结构与原量表构造基本一致。说明世界卫生组织残疾态度量表中文版具有较好的可接受性、信度和效度,可用于国人对待残疾和残疾人态度的研究。 关键词：残疾人;态度;信度;效度;世界卫生组织残疾态度量表     

Eppendorf精神分裂症量表中文版的信度和效度

目的：研究Eppendorf精神分裂症量表(ESI)中文版的信度和效度。方法：信度评价采用分半信度、内部一致性、重测信度。效度评价采用区分效度、内容效度、平行效度、结构效度。结果：KSI量表和各因子的分半信度为0．8087—0．9738，Cronbach α系数为0．7694—0．9508；1周后重测信度为0．677—0．876。各因子与总分的相关系数在0．815—0．909之间，因子之间的相关小于因子与总分的相关；ESI与阳性症状与阴性症状量表(PANSS)有很好的相关性，因子分析得出4个因子与原作者的因子相关系数在0．747—0．943之间。结论：ESI量表有较好的信度和效度，值得推广和使用。     

Yale-Brown强迫量表中文版的信度和效度

目的评价中文版Yale-B rown强迫量表Y-BOCS的信度和效度。方法对110名强迫症患者进行Y-BOCS、HAMD、HAMA的评定。结果Y-BOCS评定者间一致性好,各条目及量表总分的ICC≥0.82;重测信度良好,各条目及量表总分的ICC≥0.75;全量表内部一致性系数(Cronbach's alpha)为0.75。Y-BOCS具有较好的内容效度和结构效度,强迫思维分量表(OS)分与HAMA和HAMD量表分存在相关,OS区分效度欠理想结论Y-BOCS中文版具有可接受的信度和效度,具有临床和科研使用的价值。     

自尊量表信度效度研究

目的 研究自尊量表的信度效应。方法 以１６２名技校学生为测试对象，以ＳＡＳ、ＳＤＳ为效标，对ＳＥＳ进行信度和效度检验。结果 ＳＥＳ各亲衢叫分的平均相关系数为０．４８１１；分半信度系数为０．９５９３；重测信度系数为０．７８１６；与ＳＡＳ、ＳＤＳ呈正相关关系，相关系数分别为０．５２３和０．５０４。结论 ＳＥＳ具有较好的信度、效度，是一种较理想的自尊程度的评定工具，但第８条目应作适当修改。     

中文版精神疾病愤怒量表的信度和效度 评价

目的 检验中文版精神疾病愤怒量表（PARS）的信度和效度。方法 经原著者同意,汉 化英文版精神疾病愤怒量表,该量表包括41 个条目,利用该量表于2016 年1—12 月在上海市精神卫生 中心对125 例精神疾病患者进行评估,Cronbach''s α 计算内部一致性信度,Guttman Split-Half 计算分半 信度;计算每个条目与总分的Pearson 相关系数,并应用探索性因子分析检测PARS 的结构效度;应用 Pearson 相关分析探讨PARS 与阳性与阴性症状量表（PANSS）的校标关联效度。结果 中文版RARS 的 Cronbach''s α 系数为0.89,Guttman Split-Half 系数为0.88;各条目与总分之间的相关系数在0.19～0.72 （P＜ 0.05）;探索性因子分析共得出9 个因子,解释总方差的67%;PARS 与PANSS 中G14 条目（愤怒控制 缺乏）存在明显相关（r=0.54,P＜ 0.05）。结论 中文版PARS评估精神疾病愤怒症状具有良好的信度和 效度,可用于我国精神疾病患者愤怒的症状研究。     

情绪状态量表信度,效度分析

目的 验证情绪状态量表在国内使用的可能性。方法 使用情绪状态量表和ＳＣＬ－９０同时测定１９０名精神科病和２０名正常人，并对其中４０名病人于初评后７－１０天再进行重测；计算量阴的总分、因子分，并作相关性分析。同时对情绪状态量表的内部一致性及重测信度进行统计分析。结果 情绪状态量表与ＳＣＬ－９０总分及因子分之间有较高的相关性，量表内部一致良好。两次重测的分数之间相关性高，显示了良好的信度和效度。结论     

中文版剑桥人格解体量表的信度和效度检验

目的 翻译英文版剑桥人格解体量表（CDS）并对中文版CDS进行信、效度检验.方法 对119例健康受试者分别间隔2、3、4周进行CDS测验以计算其重测信度;临床医生按DSM-IV-TR诊断标准对76例门诊患者做出诊断,之后进行CDS测验,计算测验的重测信度、内部一致性、折半信度和效标关联效度、结构效度.结果 中文版CDS重测信度中等（0.651）,内部一致性和分半信度良好（Cronbach＇s α系数为0.938,Guttman折半信度为0.957）,效标关联效度良好（Mann-WhitneyZ值为-6.059,P＜0.001）,项目-总分相关系数从0.321～0.777,均达到显著性,结构效度尚可.结论 中文版CDS具有良好的信、效度,可以很好地评定人格解体症状.     

自我效能量表的信度及效度研究

目的评价自我效能量表(SES)的信度和效度.方法由专业医生对45例心身科门诊心理咨询者评定SES和症状自评量表(SCL-90),一周后重测SES.对量表的内部一致性、重测信度及平行效度进行分析.结果SES的Cronbach'sα系数为0.7984,重测后各项目的相关系数均在0.672～0.932之间.SES的总分与SCL-90总分间的相关系数为0.454,且半数以上的项目与SCL-90总分呈明显相关.结论SES具有较好的信度和效度.     

分离体验量表中文版信度和效度的初步研究

目的:探讨对住院精神障碍患者分离体验量表第二版(DES-II)中文版评定的信度和效度。方法:404例住院精神障碍患者进行分离体验量表的评定。6周后在初筛病例中随机抽取样本数20%进行量表重测。将DES-II量表初筛评定结果按得分高低随机排序并分组抽样:0～10分第一组抽取样本数的10%;10～20分第二组抽取30%;20～40分第三组抽取50%;40分以上第四组抽取100%。抽取99例样本进行DDIS量表评定,其中完成量表并符合分析要求量表80例,验证DES-II中文版和DDIS分量表的相关效度。结果:DES量表各项目与总分间的相关系数在0.566～0.728之间;DES-II中文版评定量表的Cronbach’s的α系数为0.957;量表奇偶分半系数分别是0.843、0.883。6周后重测量表相关系数为0.617;DES得分分组的一致性Kappa值为0.549。DES量表因子分析结果表明,量表为单一因子的一维量表。对DDIS量表除外躯体性主诉和物质滥用之外所有的13个分量表和DES量表进行关联效度分析,DDIS分量表和DES得分相关系数在0.306～0.720之间,DDIS分量表得分相加的和DES因子分的相关系数为0.994。结论:分离体验量表DES-II中文版信度和效度较好,DES和DDIS各分量表的相关性较高。DES量表可以作为临床筛查的有效工具,具有临床和科研应用价值。     

暴力危险性筛查量表中文版在精神分裂症患者中的信度与效度研究

目的：引入暴力危险性筛查量表（violenceriskscreening-10,V—RISK-10）,对V—RISK-10中文版在精神分裂症患者中的信度与效度进行检验。方法：对英文版V—RISK-10进行翻译和修订,以109例精神分裂症患者为评估对象,完成一般情况调查表、V—RISK-10中文版、卫生部危险性评估、修订版外显行为攻击量表（MOAS）的测评。其中14例患者由2位评估者独立评估V—RISK-10中文版,49例患者2周后重测V—RISK．10中文版。结果：V—RISK-10中文版9个条目的鉴别力良好,内部一致性系数0．833（P〈0．01）。评分者信度（斯皮尔曼等级相关系数：r=0．655—0．899）、重测信度（Kappa=0．536—1．000）较好（P〈0．ol或P〈0．05）。V—RISK．10中文版中7个条目得分与其综合评定建议分级（Kendal和谐系数为0．387～0．685）、危险性评估分级（Kendal和谐系数为0．319～0．618）、MOAS总分（皮尔逊相关系数：,=0,301～0．585）均显著正性相关（P均〈0．01）;关联效度理想。结论：V—RISK-10中文版在精神分裂症患者中的信度与关联效度良好。     

强迫症症状分类量表(修订版)中文版的信效度研究

目的:评价中文版强迫症症状分类量表(修订版)(OCI-R)在正常人群和强迫症患者中的信、效度。方法:采用中文版耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)对299例在校大学生及90例强迫症患者进行评定,同时要求每位被试者自行完成OCI-R中文版的评估。其中44名强迫症患者于4周后进行再次测试。结果:OCI-R中文版Cronbach’salpha=0.88,重测信度r=0.690(P<0.05)。OCI-R验证性因素分析结果:χ2=403.07,ν=120,n=299;拟合优度指数(GFI)=0.87;近似误差均方根(RMSEA)=0.086;比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.96;非标准拟合参数(NNFI)=0.95。OCI-R各条目在总量表中的负荷值r=0.450～0.660(P<0.01),各维度在总量中的负荷值r=0.662～0.782(P<0.01)。强迫症患者中OCI-R总分与Y-BOCS总分之间相关系数r=0.422(P<0.01)。结论:OCI-R(修订版)中文译本具有良好的信效度,符合心理测试要求,可适用于中国人群强迫症状的测量。     

Reliability,validity and factorial dimensions of the Interactive Observation Scale for Psychiatric Inpatients

The Interactive Observation Scale for Psychiatric Inpatients (IOSPI) is characterized by the necessity of interaction between the rater and the patient during the evaluation process. The reliability, validity and factor structure of the IOSPI were evaluated by using a total of 186 sets of ratings accomplished by 2 nursing aides on 34 adult psychiatric inpatients submitted to weekly evaluations during the 3 first weeks of hospitalization. The patients were observed by the 2 nursing aides simultaneously during the morning shift (5 h). In the afternoon of the same day, they were interviewed by two psychiatrists who filled in separately the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Factor analysis of the 16 IOSPI items revealed 5 distinct clusters of items, which represented higher-order constructs of social interest, psychomotor agitation, psychoticism, neatness and irritability. It was found that the IOSPI has significant interrater reliability, estimated by an intraclass correlation coefficient of total score and factor score. The total scores of the IOSPI showed a significant correlation with the total scores of the BPRS, meeting the criteria of concurrent validity. The criteria of predictive validity were also met, since the patients who could be discharged presented IOSPI scores significantly lower than the patients who could not be discharged. In conclusion, the IOSPI met the requirements of an evaluation scale and can stimulate therapeutic attitudes of the nursing staff by its characteristics of interactive observation.     

Reliability and validity of Persian version of Brief Self-Control Scale (BSCS) in motorcyclists

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the Persian version of brief self-control scale (BSCS) in Iranian motorcyclists.

Methods: The original English questionnaire of BSCS has been translated into Persian using the direct-reverse approach. A total of 130 motorcyclists aged 18–65?years old in Iran–Kashan completed the questionnaire. Validity was determined by content validity methods, structural validity through factor analysis, and also the convergence and divergence validity using Spearman correlation coefficient. The intra class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to estimate the reliability of the self-control tool. Reliability was calculated using Cronbach's alpha.

Results: The mean and standard deviation of the age at the time of study was 38.5?±?13.5?years old and all of the subjects were male. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the whole questionnaire (BSCS) was 0.81, which was good in this regard. The ICC coefficient was 0.88 with confidence interval of (0.8–0.93), which confirmed the repeatability of this tool. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) yielded a two-factor solution accounted for 42% of the observed variance.

Conclusion: This study showed that Persian version of BSCS has a good reliability and validity for self-control in the Persian language community.

• Key points

• The Brief Self-Control Scale (BSCS) has good internal consistency.

• The Brief Self-Control Scale (BSCS) has acceptable reliability.

• Brief Self-control Scale (BSCS) has acceptable validity and reliability in the population studies.

     

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment

Aims: The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment, as part of a psychosocial study among family caregivers of cancer patients. Methods: Participants were derived from the Second Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University in Shenyang, China. The research established the internal consistent reliability, test–retest reliability and construct validity. Results: The research comprised 400 family caregivers. The Chinese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment showed adequate internal consistency reliability, test–retest reliability and appropriate construct validity. After adjusting items 4, 8, 15 and 18, confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the five new factors of the Chinese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment had goodness of fit. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the Chinese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring specific aspects of the caregiving experience in the Chinese population.     

The Swedish version of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Construct validity and interrater reliability.

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) has been translated into Swedish and tested in 88 chronic schizophrenic patients. All 4 subscales exhibited a roughly normal distribution. The overall alpha for the positive, negative and general psychopathology subscales were 0.81, 0.58 and 0.63, respectively. The correlation between the positive and negative subscales was -0.17 (NS). The interrater reliability was 0.73-0.75 for the positive, 0.65-0.74 for the negative and 0.75-0.77 for the general psychopathology subscales. The intraclass coefficients were 0.75-0.77 for the positive, 0.27-0.46 for the negative, 0.56-0.72 for the general psychopathology subscales and 0.66-0.71 for the total scale. Thus, the validity and reliability of the PANSS (Swedish version) are quite satisfactory.