Should we perform heart retransplantation in early graft failure?

Cardiac retransplantation represents the gold standard treatment for a failing cardiac graft but the decision to offer the patient a second chance is often made difficult by both lack of donors and the ethical issues involved. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether retransplantation is a reasonable option in case of early graft failure. Between November 1985 and June 2008, 922 patients underwent cardiac transplantation at our Institution. Of these, 37 patients (4%) underwent cardiac retransplantation for cardiac failure resulting from early graft failure ( n  = 11) or late graft failure (acute rejection: n  = 2, transplant-related coronary artery disease: n  = 24). Survival at 1, 5 and 10 years of patients with retransplantation was 59%, 50% and 40% respectively. An interval between the first and the second transplantation of less than ( n  = 11, all in early graft failure) or more than ( n  = 26) 1 month was associated with a 1-year survival of 27% and 73%, and a 5-year survival of 27% and 65% respectively ( P  = 0.01). The long-term outcome of cardiac retransplantation is comparable with that of primary transplantation only in patients with transplant-related coronary artery disease. Early graft failure is a significant risk factor for survival after cardiac retransplantation and should be considered as an exclusion criteria.     

Retransplantation in 7,290 primary transplant patients: a 10-year multi-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac retransplantation is a controversial procedure due to the disparity between donor heart demand and supply. METHODS: Of 7,290 patients undergoing primary cardiac transplantation between January 1990 and December 1999 at 42 institutions contributing to the Cardiac Transplant Research Database (CTRD), 106 patients later underwent a second and 1 patient a third cardiac transplant procedure. RESULTS: The actuarial freedom from retransplantation was 99.2% and 96.8% at 1 and 10 years, respectively. Reasons for retransplantation included early graft failure (n = 34), acute cardiac rejection (n = 15), coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV, n = 39), non-specific graft failure (n = 7), and miscellaneous (n = 10). The only risk factor associated with retransplantation was younger age, reflecting the policy of preferential retransplantation of younger patients. Survival after retransplantation was inferior to that after primary transplantation (56% and 38% at 1 and 5 years, respectively). Risk factors associated with death after retransplantation included retransplantation for acute rejection (p = 0.0005), retransplantation for early graft failure (p = 0.03), and use of a female donor (p = 0.005). Survival after retransplantation for acute rejection was poorest (32% and 8% at 1 and 5 years, respectively) followed by retransplantation for early graft failure (50% and 39% at 1 and 5 years, respectively). Survival after retransplantation for CAV has steadily improved with successive eras. CONCLUSIONS: The results of retransplantation for acute rejection and early graft failure are poor enough to suggest that this option is not advisable. However, retransplantation for CAV is currently associated with satisfactory survival and should continue to be offered to selected patients.     

Cardiac retransplantation: is it justified in times of critical donor organ shortage? Long-term single-center experience

Objective: Survival after heart transplantation has improved significantly over the last decades. There are a growing number of patients that require cardiac retransplantation because of chronic allograft dysfunction. With regard to the critical shortage of cardiac allograft donors the decision to offer repeat heart transplantation must be carefully considered. Methods: Since 1983 a total of 807 heart transplantations have been performed at our institution. Among them 41 patients received cardiac retransplantation, 18 patients because of acute graft failure and 23 because of chronic graft failure. Data were analyzed for demographics, morbidity and risk factors for mortality. The acute and chronic retransplant group was compared to those patients undergoing primary transplantation. Results: The mean interval between primary transplantation and retransplantation was 1.9 days in the acute and 6.7 years in the chronic retransplant group. Mean follow-up was 6.9 years. Baseline characteristics were similar in the primary and retransplant group. Actuarial survival rates at 1, 3, 5 and 7 years after primary cardiac transplantation compared to retransplantation were 83, 78, 72 and 64% vs 53, 50, 47 and 36%, respectively (p < 0.001). Early mortality after acute retransplantation was significantly higher compared to late retransplantation (10/18, 55.6% vs 4/23, 17.4%, p = 0.011). Major causes of death were acute and chronic rejection, infection and sepsis. Conclusions: Cardiac retransplantation is associated with lower survival rates compared to primary transplantation. However, results after retransplantation in chronic graft failure are significantly better compared to acute graft failure. Therefore, we consider cardiac retransplantation in chronic graft failure a justified therapeutic option. In contrast, patients with acute graft failure seem to be inappropriate candidates for cardiac retransplantation.     

Pediatric cardiac retransplantation: intermediate-term results

BACKGROUND: Cardiac retransplantation (re-CTx) in children is a controversial therapy, yet it remains the best treatment option to recipients with failing grafts. Our objective was to determine the incidence of re-CTx in a large pediatric population of recipients and evaluate the outcome of such therapy. METHODS: Between November 1985 and November 1999, 347 children underwent cardiac transplantation at the Loma Linda University Medical Center. Of these, 32 children were listed for re-CTx. Ten patients died while waiting, and 22 recipients underwent re-CTx. Median age at re-CTx was 7.1 years (range, 52 days to 20.1 years). RESULTS: Indications for re-CTx were allograft vasculopathy (n = 16), primary graft failure (n = 5), and acute rejection (n = 1). Two patients with primary graft failure underwent retransplantation within 24 hours of the first transplantation procedure while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Median time interval to re-CTx for the others was 7.2 years (range, 32 days to 9.4 years). Operative mortality for all cardiac re-CTx procedures was 13.6%. Causes of hospital mortality were pulmonary hypertension with graft failure (n = 2) and multiorgan failure (n = 1). Median hospital stay after re-CTx was 14.1 days (range, 6 to 45 days). There was one late death from severe rejection. Actuarial survival at 3 years for re-CTx was 81.9% +/- 8.9% compared with 77.3% +/- 2.6% for primary cardiac transplantation recipients (p = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Elective re-CTx can be performed with acceptable mortality. Although the number of patients undergoing retransplantation in this report is small and their long-term outcome is unknown, the intermediate-term survival after re-CTx is similar to that of children undergoing primary cardiac transplantation.     

Long-term experiences on cardiac retransplantation in adults

Background: It remains disputed whether cardiac retransplantation should be performed. This study aimed to evaluate our long-term experiences on cardiac retransplantation in adults. Patients and methods: Between March 1989 and December 2004, 2% (28/1290) of cardiac retransplantations were performed. Results: The reasons for cardiac retransplantation were cardiac allograft vasculopathy (n = 13; 47%), primary graft failure (n = 11; 39%), and refractory acute rejection (n = 4; 14%). The 30-day mortality risk was 29% (acute rejection: 50%; primary graft failure: 36%; cardiac allograft vasculopathy: 15%, p = 0.324), compared to 8.5% for primary cardiac transplantation (p < 0.001). The causes of early death were acute rejection (n = 3; 37%), multiorgan failure (n = 3; 37%), primary graft failure (n = 1; 13%), and right ventricular failure (n = 1; 13%). The late mortality rate was 96/1000 patient-years. The causes of late death were acute rejection (n = 4; 50%), cardiac allograft vasculopathy (n = 2; 25%), multiorgan failure (n = 1; 13%), and infection (n = 1; 13%). The 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival was respectively 78, 68, 54, and 38% (primary cardiac transplantation), and 46, 41, 32, and 32% (cardiac retransplantation) (p = 0.003). The short-term survival for cardiac retransplantation due to cardiac allograft vasculopathy was likely better than primary graft failure and refractory acute rejection (p = 0.09). Conclusion: The overall outcomes of cardiac retransplantation are significantly inferior to primary cardiac transplantation. Cardiac retransplantation should be only performed for selected patients.     

A decade of living lobar lung transplantation: recipient outcomes

OBJECTIVE: Living lobar lung transplantation was developed as a procedure for patients considered too ill to await cadaveric transplantation. METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight living lobar lung transplantations were performed in 123 patients between 1993 and 2003. Eighty-four patients were adults (age, 27 +/- 7.7 years), and 39 were pediatric patients (age, 13.9 +/- 2.9 years). RESULTS: The primary indication for transplantation was cystic fibrosis (84%). At the time of transplantation, 67.5% of patients were hospitalized, and 17.9% were intubated. One-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival among living lobar recipients was 70%, 54%, and 45%, respectively. There was no difference in actuarial survival between adult and pediatric living lobar recipients (P =.65). There were 63 deaths among living lobar recipients, with infection being the predominant cause (53.4%), followed by obliterative bronchiolitis (12.7%) and primary graft dysfunction (7.9%). The overall incidence of acute rejection was 0.8 episodes per patient. Seventy-eight percent of rejection episodes were unilateral. Age, sex, indication, donor relationship, preoperative hospitalization status, use of preoperative steroids, and HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR typing did not influence survival. However, patients on ventilators preoperatively had significantly worse outcomes (odds ratio, 3.06, P =.03; Kaplan-Meier P =.002), and those undergoing retransplantation had an increased risk of death (odds ratio, 2.50). CONCLUSION: These results support the continued use of living lobar lung transplantation in patients deemed unable to await a cadaveric transplantation. We consider patients undergoing retransplantations and intubated patients to be at significantly high risk because of the poor outcomes in these populations.     

Liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic disease that progresses to end-stage liver disease. This report is a retrospective analysis of a Canadian centre experience with liver transplantation (LT) for PSC. Of 1107 LTs performed between 1984 and 2002, 132 were performed on 111 patients with PSC. Patient survival at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 84.5%, 84.5%, 83.4%, and 68.9%, respectively. Graft survival at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 80.8%, 79.8%, 72.7%, and 55.3%. These were not significantly different from overall patient survival (P =.91) or graft survival (P =.28) in non-PSC patients transplanted over the same time period. Early mortality was predominantly related to primary nonfunction and multi-organ failure; late mortality was predominantly related to malignancy. No patient with known cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) underwent LT, but three patients had an incidental CCA noted on explant pathology. All three died of widespread metastatic disease (10.8, 38.0, and 39.8 months after LT). Nineteen patients lost their primary grafts requiring retransplantation, and two of these patients required a third transplant. Recurrent PSC was detected in six patients and suspected in another six. Four patients have been retransplanted for recurrent PSC. Chronic rejection was detected in nine patients. Eight have required retransplantation. The incidence of biliary complications was 16.2%. CONCLUSIONS: LT is effective therapy for PSC. Patient and graft survival is comparable to that seen in patients transplanted for indications other than PSC, but long-term graft survival may be lower. Recurrent PSC and chronic rejection are the major determinants of graft loss.     

Liver retransplantation in children in Poland

An average of 15% of patients require retransplantation due to irreversible liver graft failure due to primary graft nonfunction, chronic rejection, vascular and biliary complications, or infections. The survival of patients and grafts after retransplantation is inferior to that after primary transplantation. The purpose of the present study was to examine the incidence, indications, and outcome of retransplantation in children. In our center 169 liver transplantations had been performed in 154 patients, and 14 patients (9%) required 15 retransplantations: nine in the early postoperative period, five late after primary transplantation, and one late after the second transplantation. One-year patient survival after primary transplantation was 82%, but after early retransplantation it was 55%.     

Heart transplantation in diabetic recipients: a decade review of 161 patients at Columbia Presbyterian

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes is considered by some transplant centers to be a relative contraindication for cardiac transplantation because of concerns regarding decreased survival, as well as increased incidence of infection and transplant coronary artery disease. We evaluated our experience with diabetic recipients over the last 10 years. METHODS: From January 1992 through June 2002, 881 patients underwent cardiac transplantation at New York Presbyterian Hospital. Of these, 161 (18.3%) were diabetic patients. Diabetic recipients were compared with a control group of 161 nondiabetic recipients matched for age, sex, cause of heart failure, United Network for Organ Sharing status, and immunosuppression era. Outcome measures included posttransplantation survival, incidence of infection, rejection, and transplant coronary artery disease. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in survival between diabetic and nondiabetic recipients, with actuarial survival at 1, 5, and 10 years of 89.3%, 66.9%, and 45.6%, respectively, for diabetic patients and 87.4%, 78.8%, and 59.1%, respectively, for nondiabetic patients (P =.168). There was no significant difference in freedom from infection, rejection, or transplant coronary artery disease between the groups. By using Cox proportional hazard models, development of infection, rejection, and transplant coronary artery disease were independent predictors of decreased survival (P <.001, P =.004, and P =.004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate similar short-term and long-term survivals, as well as similar risks for infection and transplant coronary artery disease, in diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing cardiac transplantation. The trend toward worse survival in the diabetic cohort, however, raises the possibility that if a greater number of diabetic patients were evaluated, a significant difference in survival might be observed, suggesting the need for a multicenter analysis to validate these outcomes.     

Cardiac retransplantation in childhood: analysis of data from the United Network for Organ Sharing

OBJECTIVE: For children in whom graft failure develops after cardiac transplantation, retransplantation is often considered. Although some centers have reported equivalent results for retransplantation as for primary transplantation, this strategy remains controversial. We sought to examine outcomes after retransplantation in children and to identify risk factors for mortality. METHODS: United Network for Organ Sharing records of heart transplantation for subjects younger than 18 years from 1987 to 2004 were reviewed. Indications for retransplantation and patient characteristics were evaluated. Analysis was performed with proportional hazards regression, controlling for other potential risk factors. RESULTS: Among the 4227 pediatric heart transplants, there were 219 retransplants. The most common indication for retransplantation was coronary allograft vasculopathy (51%). The mean interval from initial heart transplant to retransplantation was 4.7 +/- 3.8 years. Forty-two retransplants (19%) were performed within 180 days of primary transplantation. Survivals at 1, 5, and 10 years after retransplantation were 79%, 53%, and 44%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, retransplantation was associated with significantly higher mortality than primary transplantation (odds ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval 1.32-2.12, P < .001). Patients who underwent retransplantation within 180 days of primary transplantation had a significantly lower 1-year survival than did other retransplant recipients (53% vs 86%, respectively, P < .02). Subjects who required mechanical ventilation before retransplantation also had poorer survival (P < .03). CONCLUSION: Survival after cardiac retransplantation in children is inferior to that after primary transplantation. Although results are acceptable, the impact of retransplantation on the availability of donor hearts requires further consideration.     

Late retransplantation of the liver: a single-centre experience

Liver retransplantation is considered to carry a higher risk than primary transplantation. The aim of this study was to analyse a single-center experience with late liver retransplantation. The overall rate of primary retransplantation was 11% (30 re-OLT out of 272 primary OLT). fiftten of these (50%) had retransplantation more than 3 months after the first transplant and were analyzed by reviewing their medical records. Causes of primary graft failure leading to retransplantation were chronic hepatic artery thrombosis in 6 cases (40%), HCV cirrhotic recurrence in 4 cases (28%), chronic rejection in 2 cases (14%), veno-occlusive disease, hepatic vein thrombosis and idiopathic graft failure in 1 case each (6%). UNOS status at re-OLT was 2A in all cases. All patients were hospitalised, and three of them were in intensive care. One- and two-year patient and graft survival rates were 80% and 66% and 66% and 59%, respectively. Death occurred in 5 patients, including 2 of the 3 admitted to the intensive care unit at the time of retransplantation, who died after a mean interval of 15 +/- 9 days from retransplantation. Retransplantation should be considered a very efficient way of saving lives, especially when the optimal timing for its execution is defined.     

Outcome of liver retransplantation in children.

Irreversible liver graft failure is a life-threatening complication. We reviewed the first 200 pediatric liver transplantations in Birmingham. Forty-one children developed primary graft failure, 9 of whom developed secondary graft failure. The main indications for graft failure were primary nonfunction (PRNF; 8 patients), vascular complications (VASC; 23 patients), and chronic rejection (CHRE; 19 patients). Thirty-two children underwent retransplantation (ReTx) (21 children received reduced grafts; 11 children, whole hepatic grafts). Patient survival was significantly worse for retransplant recipients compared with children receiving a single graft (63% v 76. 5% actuarial patient survival at 1 year; P <.05). Primary graft 1-year actuarial survival was 74% in first grafts compared with 47% for regrafts (P <.05), but improved with time. The graft 1-year survival rate was 55% for whole grafts and 45% for reduced and/or split grafts in the first 100 grafts compared with 83% and 66% in the second 100 grafts, respectively (P <.01). Emergency ReTx within a month of transplantation was associated with more complications and a worse outcome (1-year survival rate, 37%) compared with patients who underwent ReTx later (1-year survival rate, 72%; P <. 01). The incidence of primary graft failure decreased from 33% in the first 100 grafts to 16% in the second 100 grafts (P <.01), as did the incidence of PRNF, which decreased from 8% to 0% (P <.05). Although the rates of graft failure from VASC decreased from 15% to 8% (P =.2) and CHRE decreased from 11% to 8% (P =.6), neither reached statistical significance. The improved results overall are because of advances in surgical techniques, intensive care management, and graft preservation and refinements in immunosuppression. We conclude that ReTx for a child with primary graft failure is justified.     

Heart retransplantation for heart allograft failure in Chinese heart transplant recipients: NTUH experience

We investigated the short- and long-term results after heart retransplantation in terms of different causes of heart allograft failure. We sought to establish the data of heart retransplantation in Chinese compared with Western counterparts due to differences in heart allograft vasculopathy. From March 1995 to May 2005, eight heart transplantation recipients with allograft failure underwent retransplantation. Heart allograft failure was due to coronary vasculopathy (CAV) in six patients (75%) and acute rejection in two patients (25%). The mean interval to retransplantation was 32 to 84 months (mean 54.3 months). There were five patients who survived after heart retransplantation for CAV and no patient survived after an earlier diagnosis of acute rejection. Heart retransplantation is a feasible method with acceptable long-term survival rate for heart allograft failure. After careful pretransplant evaluation, retransplantation is acceptable. The survival after retransplantation for CAV is notably great than that after acute rejection. Heart retransplantation is the only way for patients who have cardiac allograft failure to achieve long-term survival.     

Cardiac retransplantation: a 15-year single-center clinical experience

BACKGROUND: Cardiac retransplantation is a controversial therapy because of the shortage of donor hearts. We retrospectively reviewed the short-term and long-term outcomes after cardiac retransplantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-eight cases (18 males, 7 females; mean age, 50.3 +/- 13.5 years) underwent cardiac retransplantation: 25 first retransplantations and 3 second retransplantations. The indications for retransplantation were primary graft failure (PGF) in 11 patients (39.3%), intractable acute cardiac rejection (IACR) in 4 patients (14.3%), and coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in 13 patients (46.4%). The patients had been supported as follows: prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB; n = 3), intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP; n = 1), intravenous inotropic support (n = 7), extracorporeal membranoxygenator (ECMO; n = 3), ventricular assist device (VAD; n = 4), and no inotropic support (n = 10). There were 8 deaths within 30 days after retransplantation (28.6%). The overall 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 46.4%, 40.6%, 32.5%, and 32.5%, respectively. Acute cardiac rejection was the most common cause of death (43.8%). Thirty-day and 1-year survival rates of IACR, PGF, and CAV were 50.0%/0%, 63.6%/45.5%, and 84.6%/68.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival after retransplantation was acceptable for patients with CAV and PGF; however, we must select patients for retransplantation carefully if the indication is IACR, because of the poor outcome.     

Early and late outcomes after cardiac retransplantation

Background

Cardiac retransplantation remains the most viable option for patients with allograft heart failure; however, careful patient selection is paramount considering limited allograft resources. We analyzed clinical outcomes following retransplantation in an academic, tertiary care institution.

Methods

Between 1981 and 2011, 593 heart transplantations, including 22 retransplantations were performed at our institution. We analyzed the preoperative demographic characteristics, cause of allograft loss, short- and long-term surgical outcomes and cause of death among patients who had cardiac retransplantations.

Results

Twenty-two patients underwent retransplantation: 10 for graft vascular disease, 7 for acute rejection and 5 for primary graft failure. Mean age at retransplantation was 43 (standard deviation [SD] 15) years; 6 patients were women. Thirteen patients were critically ill preoperatively, requiring inotropes and/or mechanical support. The median interval between primary and retransplantation was 2.2 (range 0–16) years. Thirty-day mortality was 31.8%, and conditional (> 30 d) 1-, 5- and 10-year survival after retransplantation were 93%, 79% and 59%, respectively. A diagnosis of allograft vasculopathy (p = 0.008) and an interval between primary and retransplantation greater than 1 year (p = 0.016) had a significantly favourable impact on 30-day mortality. The median and mean survival after retransplantation were 3.3 and 5 (SD 6, range 0–18) years, respectively; graft vascular disease and multiorgan failure were the most common causes of death.

Conclusion

Long-term outcomes for primary and retransplantation are similar if patients survive the 30-day postoperative period. Retransplantation within 1 year of the primary transplantation resulted in a high perioperative mortality and thus may be a contraindication to retransplantation.     

Liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis: influence of primary immunosuppression on survival

INTRODUCTION: Liver transplantation is the only established curative therapy for end-stage primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). However, the influence of primary immunosuppression on long-term patient and graft survival is still controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 1372 patients who underwent liver transplantation from April 1989 to January 2001, 95 (6.9%) suffered from PBC. The primary immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine (CyA; n = 56) and tacrolimus (FK; n = 39). RESULTS: The median survival of all PBC patients at 5 years was 92% and at 10 years, 90%. There was no difference between the two primary immunosuppression agents. Seven patients died, including five in the cyclosporine group (median = 25 months) and two in the tacrolimus cohort (median = 37 months). One CyA patient group died due to PBC recurrence. Seven patients underwent retransplantation without any difference in primary immunosuppression (CyA 7%; FK 10%). Fifty patients developed an acute rejection episode (CyA 57%; FK 46%); 2 patients, chronic rejection (CyA 2%; FK 4%). Fifty-five patients developed AMA titers after liver transplantation (CyA 66%; FK 46%). Patients presented cyclosporine-based regimens showed significantly (P = .001) more side effects. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up after liver transplantation for PBC shows excellent organ and patient survival. The choice of the primary immunsuppressant had no significant influence on patient survival, PBC-related graft loss, or development of acute or chronic rejection episodes.     

原位心脏移植治疗终末期心脏病141例

目的分析总结原位心脏移植治疗终末期心脏病的临床疗效及经验。方法为141例终末期心脏病患者施行原位心脏移植术,原发病包括扩张性性心肌病118例,肥厚性心肌病2例,限制性心肌病2例,缺血性心肌病9例,原发性心脏恶性肿瘤4例,瓣膜性心肌病3例,其它病因3例。供心冷缺血时间为(191.0±28.5)m in,供心卵圆孔未闭者9例,大室间隔缺损者1例,冠状动脉开口异常者1例。9例卵圆孔未闭的供心,先行卵圆孔缝闭术,然后再行移植;1例大室间隔缺损的供心,先行室间隔缺损修补术,然后再行移植;1例冠状动脉开口异常的供心,复跳后心肌收缩乏力,遂施行右冠状动脉松解术,其后复跳良好。120例行双腔静脉吻合法原位心脏移植术,19例行标准Stanford原位心脏移植术,2例行全心脏移植术。主动脉阻断时间为(53.0±4.5)m in,吻合时间为(41.5±5.5)m in。术后应用环孢素A(或他克莫司)、激素及霉酚酸酯预防排斥反应,28例患者同时应用达利珠单抗1~5剂。结果手术成功率为97.9%,术后随访1~65个月,1年、3年、5年存活率分别为90.8%、84.6%、81.4%,术后1年内的主要死因是急性排斥反应、感染、移植物功能衰竭及心脏肿瘤转移,术后中远期的主要死因是急性排斥反应、感染、肾功能衰竭及移植心脏冠状动脉硬化。术后并发症以急性排斥反应、感染、肾功能异常、移植心脏功能衰竭多见。结论终末期心脏病行原位心脏移植的临床疗效良好;远期需注意对急性排斥反应、感染及移植心脏冠状动脉硬化的监测及治疗。     

Pediatric liver retransplantation: indications and outcome

INTRODUCTION: Liver transplantation is the only treatment for end-stage liver disease. Not all patients have a favorable outcome. Graft failure secondary to primary nonfunction, vascular complications, or chronic rejection among other problems may lead to retransplantation. Retransplantation represents 8% to 29% of liver transplantations in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to present our experience with retransplanted children by analyzing the indications and the results. METHODS: All patients were prospectively included in our database, including 125 children. We included the indications for retransplantation, complications, and mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Since 1994, 125 patients were transplanted and 25 were retransplanted (20%), including 5 who received a third graft. Primary nonfunction represented 30% of the indications for retransplantation and hepatic artery thrombosis, 20%. Six of 25 patients who received a first retransplantation and 2 of 5 who received a second retransplantation died. The most frequent cause of death was multiorgans failure. The survivals at 1 and 5 years were 82% and 76% for children receiving a first retransplantation, and 60% at 1 and 5 years for those who received a second retransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Organ failure after liver transplantation was a common event in pediatric transplantation. Survival was similar between patients transplanted once and those who received one retransplantation. Survival decreased among patients who received a third graft but was maintained at 60%, which is better than most published results for first retransplanted patients. Retransplantation is a valid option with good results for selected pediatric cases.     

A single-center experience of late retransplantation of the liver

Liver retransplantation is considered to carry a higher risk than primary transplantation. However, there are an increasing number of retransplant candidates, especially owing to late graft failure. The aim of this study was to analyze a single-center experience in late liver retransplantation. The overall rate of primary retransplantation was 11.4% (28 re-OLT out of 245 primary OLT); the 14 (52%) who underwent retransplantation at more than 3 months after the first transplant were analyzed by a medical record review. Causes of primary graft failure leading to retransplantation were chronic hepatic artery thombosis in five cases (36%); recurrent HCV cirrhosis in four cases (29%); chronic rejection in two cases (14%); veno-occlusive disease; hepatic vein thrombosis or idiopathic graft failure in one case each (7%). UNOS status at re-OLT was always 2A, all patients were hospitalized; three were intensive care unit bound. ICU and total hospital stay had been 7 +/- 5 and 28 +/- 16 days, respectively. One- and 2-year patient and graft survivals were 84% and 62% and 67% and 67%, respectively. Death occurred in four patients. Two out of the three recovered in ICU at the time of retransplantation, at a median interval of 15 +/- 9 days after retransplantation. The survival rate after late retransplantation is improving, and this option should be considered to be a efficient way to save lives, especially by defining the optimal timing for retransplantation.     

The results of cardiac retransplantation: an analysis of the Joint International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation/United Network for Organ Sharing Thoracic Registry

BACKGROUND: It is well established that repeat heart transplantation has a significantly worse outcome when compared with primary (first time) transplantation. Defining the risk factors for mortality within this group has been difficult due to small numbers of patients at individual centers. METHODS: All cardiac retransplants performed in the United States and registered in the Joint International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT)/United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Thoracic Registry were analyzed for demographics, morbidity posttransplantation, immunosuppression, and risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: The study cohort included 514 patients of which 81% were male with a mean age of 47+/-12 years. Time from primary transplant to retransplantation ranged from 1 day to 15.5 years and more than 50% of the patients underwent retransplantation for chronic rejection. More than 60% of patients were in the intensive care unit at the time of retransplantation and more than 40% of the patients were reported to be on some form of life support (ventricular assist device, ventilator, and/or inotropic therapy). Survival for the entire retransplant cohort was 65, 59, and 55% for 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, but was substantially lower when the intertransplant interval was short. Conversely, when the interval between primary and retransplantation was more than 2 years, 1 year survival postretransplantation approached that of primary transplantation. Additional independent risk factors for mortality for the retransplant cohort included overall cardiac transplant center volume, the use of a ventricular assist device or ventilator, the patient being in the intensive care unit, and recipient age. The four most common causes of death were infection, primary/nonspecific graft failure, chronic rejection (allograft vasculopathy), and acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm that repeat heart transplantation is a higher risk procedure than primary transplantation, especially early after the primary heart transplant.