Effective delivery of particles with the HandiHaler dry powder inhalation system over a range of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity.

The HandiHaler is a dry powder breath activated inhaler system developed for inhalation therapy for patients with airway disease. Its operation is based on the evacuation of powder from a pierced capsule. We sought to document the inspiratory flow rates attained by patients inspiring through the HandiHaler with various degrees of airflow limitation. Subjects with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were the study's population. An in vitro study of fine particle dose was conducted using an Andersen Cascade Impactor to assess medication delivery at low inspiratory flow rates. Subsequently, an in vivo study was conducted to determine inspiratory flow rates in patients with COPD as measured through a pneumotach with a custom coupler device with and without the HandiHaler. Patients were classified into three approximately equal groups of spirometric severity ranging from mild (46-65% predicted normal forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [FEV1]), to moderate (28-45%) to severe (< or = 27%). The in vitro study indicated delivery of medication at flow rates as low as 20 L/min. Twenty-six men completed the in vivo study (age 66.9 +/- 10.9 years, FEV1 = 1.02 +/- 0.45 l.). The median peak inspiratory flow rates attained in the mild (n = 8), moderate (n = 10), and severe (n = 8) categories were 45, 45.6, and 35.4 L/min respectively. The minimum peak inspiratory flow rates in the three groups were 28.2, 21.6 and 20.4 L/min. The HandiHaler device effectively delivers particles to the lung over a wide range of airflow limitation in patients with COPD.     

Novolizer: a multidose dry powder inhaler

Novolizer is a multidose breath-actuated dry powder inhaler (DPI) approved for use with salbutamol (albuterol) and budesonide. It has multiple patient feedback mechanisms and an inspiratory flow rate threshold designed to optimise dosage. In two studies, children aged 4-11 years with asthma correctly used Novolizer and generated mean peak inspiratory flow rates (PIFRs) through Novolizer of 76 and 92.7 L/min, well above the Novolizer threshold of 35-50 L/min. In healthy volunteers, median lung deposition of budesonide administered via Novolizer was 19.9-32.1% at mean PIFRs of 54-99 L/min. In a randomised, double-blind, single-dose study in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, the 1-hour improvement from baseline in mean maximum forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) was 21.3% with inhalation of salbutamol through Novolizer, and 19.5% through Sultanol pressurised metered-dose inhaler (MDI). FEV(1) increased significantly in patients with asthma and COPD treated for 4 weeks in a randomised, open-label comparison of salbutamol through either Novolizer or Sultanol MDI. A randomised open-label study in adults with asthma treated with inhaled budesonide found equivalent improvements in FEV(1) and symptoms with Novolizer and Turbuhaler. Novolizer was well accepted overall. Most patients preferred it to previously used MDIs or DPIs. Only 4-5% found the taste feedback unacceptable. Physicians observed improved compliance over 4 weeks in 80% of patients with asthma using Novolizer.     

Inspiratory flow rates through a novel dry powder inhaler (Clickhaler) in pediatric patients with asthma.

Inspiratory flow profiles through a novel dry powder inhaler (DPI) (Clickhaler; Innovata Biomed Ltd, St. Albans, UK) were recorded in 17 pediatric patients (aged 7-16 years) with stable mild to moderate asthma. Most patients (n = 14) could generate high peak inspiratory flows (PIFs) (> 60 L/min) and high flows early in the flow profile. These flows have been shown to be adequate to deaggregate and deliver micronized drug with this delivery system.     

Inspiratory flow rates and volumes with the Aerolizer dry powder inhaler in asthmatic children and adults

OBJECTIVE: To assess the peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) and forced inspiratory vital capacity (FIVC) through the formoterol (Foradil*) Aerolizer* in patients with mild, moderate and severe asthma. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: PIFR and FIVC were assessed in 33 adults and 32 children using a spirometer alone (baseline), a spirometer with an adaptor, and a spirometer with an adaptor and the Aerolizer inhaler (placebo loaded). RESULTS: Of adult patients using the Aerolizer inhaler, 73% had PIFR values of >100 l/min and 91% had values of >60 l/min. PIFR in adults was reduced from a mean baseline of 283 l/min to 118 l/min through the loaded Aerolizer inhaler. Similarly, 75% of children using the Aerolizer inhaler had PIFR values >80 l/min and 91% had values of > 60 l/min. The mean PIFR in children was reduced from a baseline of 154 l/min to 100 l/min through the loaded Aerolizer inhaler. Only small mean decreases from baseline were observed in FIVC through the loaded Aerolizer inhaler: 8.4% in adults and 3.8% in children. FIVC values of > 2.0 litre were achieved in 82% of adults, and 81% of children achieved FIVC values of >1.5 litre. CONCLUSIONS: This study, albeit in a relatively small patient population, suggests that most children and adults with asthma can generate PIFRs of > 60 l/min and FIVCs of > 1.5 litre through the Aerolizer inhaler regardless of their disease severity. Such findings compare extremely favourably with other dry powder inhalers.     

Dose delivery characteristics of the AIR pulmonary delivery system over a range of inspiratory flow rates.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo dose delivery characteristics of the AIR pulmonary delivery system over a range of flow rates. A 5-mg placebo powder of engineered particles with low densities (<0.4 g/cc) and large geometric diameters (>5 microm) was delivered via a simple, capsule based, passive dry powder inhaler. The emitted dose, geometric and aerodynamic particle size distributions (aPSDs) were obtained over a range of flow rates (15-60 LPM). The in vitro results demonstrated improved powder dispersion with increasing flow rate through the inhaler. The in vivo dose delivery characteristics were obtained by gamma scintigraphy. Twelve healthy subjects performed the following three inhalation maneuvers: (i) a targeted peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) of 20 +/- 10 LPM, (ii) a deep comfortable inhalation, and (iii) a deep forced inhalation. PIFR and inhaled volume were obtained during the inhalation of the dose using a spirometer. In vivo dose delivery was characterized by high and reproducible emitted doses (mean = 87%; inter and intra-subject CV = 5%) and high lung deposition (mean = 51% of the total dose), with low inter and intra-subject CVs (18% and 13%, respectively) across a range of PIFRs (12-86 LPM). Lung deposition of the total dose was shown not to be dependent on PIFR by analysis of variance across the range of inspiratory flow rates (p = 0.29). This was due to the competing effects of smaller aPSDs, increased extrathoracic deposition and higher emitted doses with increasing PIFR. Fully characterizing the effect of inspiratory flow rate requires analysis of the therapeutic response, as well as in vitro dose delivery and lung deposition.     

On the use of dry powder inhalers in situations perceived as constrained.

Dose delivery from dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are dependent on the inhalation effort of the patient. Some patient groups, including asthmatic children, patients with acute asthma, and patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are perceived as having problems in readily inhaling from a DPI in an efficient way; this opinion is based on alleged low inhalation flows. A review of the literature however shows that these groups can use a DPI in an efficient way and gain good clinical effect from its use. Particularly, it has been shown that children can generate a good peak inhalation flow through a DPI, albeit a lower inhaled volume. Similarly, patients with acute asthma can use a DPI in an efficient way, even reaching a better clinical effect with the DPI than with a pressurized metered dose inhaler with a spacer. Finally, it was shown that patients with severe COPD can generate the inhalation flows needed to generate an efficient drug aerosol from a DPI. Collectively, the discussed patient groups seem to perform as well as other subjects when it comes to their ability to generate an adequate inhalation flow through a DPI.     

Treating asthma in children with beclomethasone dipropionate: Pulvinal versus Diskhaler.

Seventy-two children (mean age, 10.1 years) with stable moderate asthma who completed a 7-day run-in period were randomized to receive a 4-week treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate (200 micrograms twice daily) administered through two different powder inhalers (Pulvinal; Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy and Diskhaler; Glaxo-Wellcome, Evreux, France) in a parallel group design. Sixty-nine patients completed the study. Morning and evening peak expiratory flow values, the use of rescue salbutamol, and the severity of clinical symptoms were recorded daily on a diary card. Pulmonary function tests were performed at baseline and then after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. Pulmonary function values, daily morning and evening peak expiratory flow, and most of the clinical symptoms significantly improved, although the use of rescue salbutamol significantly decreased from the second week of treatment until the end of the study in both groups. Equivalence of efficacy between groups was demonstrated for both pulmonary function and clinical parameters. We conclude that the Pulvinal inhaler is as efficacious as the Diskhaler in beclomethasone-based therapy of asthmatic children.     

Pharmacokinetics of budesonide and formoterol administered via 1 pressurized metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma and COPD

In 3 open-label studies, the systemic bioavailability of budesonide and formoterol administered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) or dry powder inhaler (DPI) formulations was evaluated in asthma (24 children, 55 adults) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; n = 26) patients. Treatments were administered at doses high enough to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters reliably. Two of the studies included an experimental budesonide pMDI formulation. In study 1 (asthma, adults), budesonide area under the curve (AUC) was 32% and 31% lower and maximal budesonide concentration (C(max)) 45% and 56% lower after budesonide/formoterol pMDI and budesonide pMDI versus budesonide DPI. Formoterol AUC and C(max) were 13% and 39% lower after budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus formoterol DPI. In study 2 (asthma, children), budesonide AUC and C(max) were 27% and 41% lower after budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus budesonide DPI + formoterol DPI. In study 3 (COPD/asthma, adults), budesonide AUC and C(max) were similar and formoterol AUC and C(max) 18% and 22% greater after budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI (COPD). Budesonide and formoterol AUC were 12% and 15% higher in COPD versus asthma patients. In conclusion, systemic exposure generally is similar or lower with budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus combination therapy via separate DPIs or monotherapy and comparable between asthma and COPD patients.     

Active and intelligent inhaler device development

The dry powder inhaler, which has traditionally relied on the patient's inspiratory force to deaggregate and deliver the active agent to the target region of the lung, has been a successful delivery device for the provision of locally active agents for the treatment of conditions such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, such devices can suffer from poor delivery characteristics and/or poor reproducibility. More recently, drugs for systemic delivery and more high value compounds have been put into DPI devices. Regulatory, dosing, manufacturing and economic concerns have demanded that a more efficient and reproducible performance is achieved by these devices. Recently strategies have been put in place to produce a more efficient DPI device/formulation combination. Using one novel device as an example the paper will examine which features are important in such a device and some of the strategies required to implement these features. All of these technological advances are invisible, and may be irrelevant, to the patient. However, their inability to use an inhaler device properly has significant implications for their therapy. Use of active device mechanisms, which reduce the dependence on patient inspiratory flow, and sensible industrial design, which give the patient the right clues to use, are important determinants of performance here.     

小气道功能指标在儿童哮喘病情严重程度评估及临床诊断中的应用

目的 探讨小气道功能指标在儿童哮喘病情严重程度评估及临床诊断中的应用价值。方法 选取2013年5月至2016年4月于郑州市第二人民医院56例哮喘急性发作期病儿作为哮喘组,并根据哮喘急性发作严重程度分为轻度(21例)、中度(20例)和重度(15例)三个亚组,同时选取同期、年龄相仿及性别相匹配的30例因其他原因引起喘息咳嗽的慢性炎症病儿和32例入院检查健康儿童分别作为非哮喘组和对照组,收集各组儿童一般资料,采用肺功能测定系统检测各组儿童用力肺活量(FVC)、最大呼气流量(PEF)、第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)和FEV1/FVC比值、呼出25%肺活量时呼气流速(FEF25%)、呼出50%肺活量时呼气流速(FEF50%)、呼出75%肺活量时呼气流速(FEF75%)、最大中期呼气流速(MMEF)等指标。结果 与对照组比较,非哮喘组和哮喘组病儿FVC、FEV1、PEF、FEF25%、FEF50%、FEF75%和MMEF等指标均显著降低(P<0.05),且哮喘组病儿上述指标显著低于非哮喘组[(1.42±0.36)L比(1.85±0.47)L、(1.25±0.32)L比(1.42±0.41)L、(2.68±0.64)L比(3.25±0.77)L/s、(2.54±0.65)L/s比(3.74±0.68)L/s、(1.58±0.36)L/s比(2.24±0.71)L/s、(0.61±0.37)L/s比(1.02±0.41)L/s、(1.42±0.49)L/s比(1.89±0.68)L/s)](均P<0.05),而三组病儿FEV1/FVC指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。哮喘急性发作期不同程度病儿用力呼出25%肺活量的呼气流量占预计值百分比(FEF25pred%)、用力呼出50%肺活量的呼气流量占预计值百分比(FEF50pred%)、用力呼出75%肺活量的呼气流量占预计值百分比(FEF75pred%)、最大呼气中期流量占预计值的百分比(MMEFpred%)等指标比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且随着病情程度增加,病儿FEF25pred%、FEF50pred%、FEF75pred%、MMEFpred%等指标呈现明显降低趋势(P<0.05),FEF25%和FEF75%指标在不同严重程度哮喘病儿中异常率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),FEF50%和MMEF指标比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),其中FEF25%主要表现为轻度异常,而FEF75%主要表现为重度异常。结论 小气道功能指标在儿童哮喘病情严重程度评估及临床诊断具有重要意义,随着病情加剧,小气道功能指标明显降低,且异常率显著增加。     

Identifying the features of an easy-to-use and intuitive dry powder inhaler for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease therapy: results from a 28-day device handling study,and an airflow resistance study

Background: Many patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) symptoms remain insufficiently controlled despite inhalation treatment, with poor inhaler technique recognized as a significant contributor. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) need less coordination of actuation and inspiration than pressured metered dose inhalers.

Objectives: To assess whether consideration of ‘ideal inhaler’ features during design and development of a new DPI device (Forspiro® Sandoz AG, Switzerland) led to an easy-to-use and reliable inhaler.

Methods: Two studies are reported here: i) 24 adult Accuhaler® users received either limited written instructions (n = 12) or fully illustrated instructions (n = 12) for the Forspiro device; and ii) peak inspiratory flow rates through the Forspiro device were assessed in 30 adult and 10 pediatric patients with asthma and 10 adult patients with COPD.

Results: All subjects understood the correct sequence of actions for the Forspiro device and rated all aspects of handling the device as ‘very easy’ or ‘fairly easy’ (except one uninstructed subject who rated ‘ease of determining number of doses left’ as ‘fairly difficult’). All patients achieved ≥ 35 l/min, thus demonstrating that the Forspiro device provides low-medium airflow resistance.

Conclusions: Inhaler design providing good drug delivery with maximum ease of use may lead to more reliable therapy and improved control of airway diseases.     

Pharmacodynamic study of procaterol hydrochloride dry powder inhaler: evaluation of pharmacodynamic equivalence between procaterol hydrochloride dry powder inhaler and procaterol hydrochloride metered-dose inhaler in asthma patients in a randomized, double-dummy, double-blind crossover manner

Therapeutic equivalence between procaterol hydrochloride dry powder inhaler (Meptin DPI) and procaterol hydrochloride metered-dose inhaler (Meptin MDI), the currently marketed formulation, was assessed in 16 patients with bronchial asthma. The study was conducted in a randomized, double-dummy, double-blind crossover manner, using forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) as an index of bronchodilatory effect. In Period I, the patients received 20 mcg of either Meptin DPI or Meptin MDI, and then crossed over in Period II after a washout interval of 3--28 days. Pharmacodynamic equivalence was accessed using AUC (FEV1)/h and peak FEV1 as indices, and the data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Factors used for the analysis were the treatment group and/or carryover effect, patients within each group, period, and treatment. The 90% confidence intervals for the differences between the two treatments were --0.0995 to --0.0204 (L) for mean AUC (FEV1)/h and --0.102 to --0.022 (L) for mean peak FEV1, both within the acceptance criteria of --0.15 to 0.15 (L). Meptin DPI was therefore assessed as being equivalent to the current Meptin MDI.     

Comparison of bronchoprotective and bronchodilator effects of a single dose of formoterol delivered by hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon aerosols and dry powder in a double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study

BACKGROUND: In response to the phasing out of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) inhalers, a metered dose hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulation, Modulite (Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy), to be delivered with a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI), has been developed. Modulite is a HFA formulation technology that has been designed to provide stable and uniform dose delivery of HFA-based formulations to enable an easy transition from CFC to HFA inhalers. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the bronchoprotective and bronchodilator effects of a single dose of 12 microg of formoterol from the HFA Modulite inhaler with the Foradil Aerolizer (dry powder inhaler, DPI) and the Foradil CFC inhalers (Novartis Health Consumer, Basel, Switzerland). METHODS: This was a double blind, double dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study conducted in 38 subjects with mild to moderate asthma (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] 87.5% predicted). The primary endpoint was methacholine challenge provocative dose required for 20% fall in the FEV1 (PD20) 90 min post dose. Bronchodilation was assessed with spirometry (FEV1, FVC, FEF25-75) and impulse oscillometry (resistance at 5 and 20 Hz, reactance at 5 Hz and resonant frequency) over the 90 min post dose. In a subset of 12 subjects formoterol plasma levels, serum potassium and glucose were determined up to 480 min post dose. RESULTS: The three formoterol formulations demonstrated significant (P < or = 0.05) improvements in bronchoprotection compared to placebo and non-inferiority of the HFA preparation compared to the CFC and DPI preparations was demonstrated. Geometric mean PD20 values were 0.51 mg with HFA, 0.62 mg with DPI, 0.62 mg with CFC and 0.2 mg with placebo. The log transformed mean differences in PD20 doubling dose between HFA and (a) DPI was -0.28 (95% CI -0.84-0.29, P = 0.57) (b) CFC was -0.28 (95% CI -0.84-0.28, P = 0.57) and (c) placebo was 1.38 (95% CI 0.82-1.94, P < 0.001). Serum potassium, glucose and formoterol plasma profiles were comparable for the CFC, HFA and DPI devices. CONCLUSION: Our findings of similar efficacy, pharmacokinetics and systemic effects of the HFA formoterol inhaler compared to the CFC and DPI preparations supports the potential use of this novel formulation in the treatment of asthma.     

Inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate: a review of its use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The salmeterol/fluticasone propionate dry powder inhaler (DPI) [Advair Diskus, Seretide Accuhaler] contains the long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonist salmeterol and the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate. In the US, twice-daily salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/250 microg is approved for use in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) associated with chronic bronchitis, and in the EU, the twice-daily 50/500 microg dosage is approved for use in patients with severe COPD, repeat exacerbations and significant symptoms despite bronchodilator therapy. In patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, twice-daily inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/250 or 50/500 microg for 24-52 weeks improves predose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) significantly more than salmeterol monotherapy, improves postdose or postbronchodilator FEV1 significantly more than fluticasone propionate monotherapy and results in clinically significant improvements in health-related quality of life. Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/500 microg significantly reduced annual COPD exacerbations, especially in severe COPD. Some corticosteroid-related adverse events were increased in recipients of fluticasone propionate with or without salmeterol versus salmeterol monotherapy or placebo; withdrawal from fluticasone propionate, including combination therapy, needs careful management to minimise COPD exacerbations. The DPI combining a corticosteroid and long-acting beta2-agonist provides benefits over monotherapy and may encourage patient compliance in COPD.     

Inhalation characteristics and their effects on in vitro drug delivery from dry powder inhalers Part 1. Inhalation characteristics, work of breathing and volunteers'' preference in dependence of the inhaler resistance

A test inhaler with exchangeable air flow resistances encompassing the range of commercial DPIs has been used to study the inspiratory flow curves of 39 healthy adult volunteers. A strong increase in mean Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate (PIFR) has been obtained with decreasing inhaler resistance, varying between 160 1/min for a resistance equivalent to the Rotahaler and 50 1/min for the simulated Inhalator Ingelheim at maximum inspiratory effort. The volunteers experienced on average 55% of maximum effort as comfortable (expressed in PIFR) and gave preference (82%) to relative high air flow resistances in the range of 0.4-0.9 × 10⁵ (N^0.5·s·m⁻⁴). It has been calculated that the real amount of work of breathing does not increase with increasing air flow resistance at comfortable inspiration mode. At maximum inspiration, the amount of work performed through a high resistance inhaler (1.5 × 10⁵) is approx. 70% of that through a low resistance device (0.4 × 10⁵). The calculated mean PIFR of 62 1/min at maximum effort through an air flow resistance of 0.9 × 10⁵, equivalent to the Turbuhaler, is in good agreement with PIFR-values of 68.5 vs. 59 1/min from two other studies with asthmatic patients through this device. It has, therefore, been concluded that the flow curves of healthy volunteers may be used to predict the range of PIFRs for asthmatics through the same air flow resistances.     

Efficacy and safety of budesonide and formoterol in one pressurised metered-dose inhaler in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe asthma: a randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the preferred maintenance therapy for adults and children with mild, moderate and severe persistent asthma, with the addition of a long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist to ICS therapy recommended for patients with moderate or severe persistent asthma. The efficacy and safety of the combination of budesonide and formoterol delivered via dry powder inhaler (DPI) is well documented. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol pressurised metered-dose inhaler (budesonide/formoterol pMDI; Symbicort pMDI, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA) with budesonide pMDI (Pulmicort pMDI, Astra [corrected] Zeneca, Lund, Sweden), formoterol DPI (Oxis Turbuhaler, AstraZeneca, Lund, Sweden), budesonide plus formoterol in separate inhalers (budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI) and placebo. STUDY DESIGN: This was a 12-week randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: This multicentre study was conducted in the respiratory specialty clinical practice setting. PATIENTS: The study included 596 patients > or =12 years of age with moderate to severe persistent asthma previously receiving ICSs. INTERVENTIONS: After 2 weeks on budesonide pMDI 80 microg x two inhalations (160 microg) twice daily, patients received budesonide/formoterol pMDI 160 microg/4.5 microg x two inhalations (320 microg/9 microg); budesonide pMDI 160 microg x two inhalations (320 microg) + formoterol DPI 4.5 microg x two inhalations (9 microg); budesonide pMDI 160 microg x two inhalations (320 microg); formoterol DPI 4.5 microg x two inhalations (9 microg); or placebo twice daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: There were two prespecified primary efficacy variables: mean change from baseline in morning predose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), obtained approximately 12 hours after the most recent administration of study medication at home and immediately before the next administration of study medication at the clinic; and mean change from baseline in 12-hour FEV(1), assessed as the average change in FEV(1) from serial spirometry over the 12-hour period after administration of the morning dose of study medication at the clinic. RESULTS: Mean changes from baseline in morning predose FEV(1) at end of treatment were greater (p < or = 0.049) with budesonide/formoterol pMDI (0.19L) versus budesonide pMDI (0.10L), formoterol DPI (-0.12L) and placebo (-0.17L). Mean changes from baseline in 12-hour FEV(1) were greater (p < or = 0.001) with budesonide/formoterol pMDI after 1 day (0.37L), 2 weeks (0.34L) and at end of treatment (0.37L) versus budesonide pMDI (0.11, 0.15 and 0.15L) and placebo (0.09, -0.03 and -0.03L), and after 2 weeks and at end of treatment versus formoterol DPI (0.19 and 0.17L). Fewer (p < or = 0.025) patients receiving budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus monoproducts or placebo met worsening asthma criteria. Results were similar in the budesonide/formoterol pMDI group and the budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI group on all measures. All treatments were well tolerated with similar safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, twice-daily budesonide/formoterol pMDI provides asthma control significantly greater than the monocomponents or placebo and comparable with budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI. Safety profiles were similar for all treatments.     

Effect of an external resistance to airflow on the inspiratory flow curve

Inhalation is a convenient way to deliver drugs to the respiratory tract in the treatment of respiratory diseases. For dry powder inhalers (DPI's), the principle of operation is to use the patient-generated inspiratory flow as energy source for emptying of the dose system and the delivery of fine drug particles into the respiratory tract. Resistance to airflow of the inhaler device is a major determinant for the inspiratory flow profile through the dry powder inhaler that can be generated by the patient. Therefore, resistance to airflow is one of the design parameters for DPI's, that could be used to control the inspiratory flow profile, and is one of the parameters to optimise particle deposition in the airways. In this study the effect of resistance to airflow on different parameters of the inspiratory flow curves as generated by healthy subjects, asthmatics and COPD patients was determined. As a result of increased resistance to airflow, the peak inspiratory flow (PIF), the flow increase rate (FIR) and the inhaled volume to reach PIF is decreased. On the other hand, the total inhalation time as well as the 80% dwell time is increased. In general, tuning of the resistance to airflow in the design of a dry powder inhaler may improve the drug deposition in the respiratory tract.     

Novolizer: how does it fit into inhalation therapy?

Inhalation therapy is the preferred route of administration of anti-asthmatic drugs to the lungs. However, the vast majority of patients cannot use their inhalers correctly, particularly pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs). The actual proportion of patients who do not use their inhalers correctly may even be under-estimated as GPs tend to over-estimate correct inhalation technique. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) have many advantages over pMDIs. Unlike pMDIs, they are environmentally-friendly, contain no propellant gases and, more importantly, they are breath-activated, so that the patient does not need to coordinate actuation of the inhaler with inspiration. Three key parameters for correct inhaler use should be considered when evaluating existing or future DPI devices and especially when choosing the appropriate device for the patient: (1) usability, (2) particle size distribution of the emitted drug and (3) intrinsic airflow resistance of the device. The Novolizer is a breath-activated, multidose, refillable DPI. It is easy to use correctly, has multiple feedback and control mechanisms which guide the patient through the correct inhalation manoeuvre. In addition, the Novolizer has an intelligent dose counter, which resets only after a correct inhalation and may help to monitor patient compliance. The Novolizer has a comparable or better lung deposition than the Turbuhaler at similar or higher peak inspiratory flow (PIF) rates. A flow trigger valve system ensures a clinically effective fine particle fraction (FPF) and sufficient drug delivery, which is important for a good lung deposition. The FPF produced through the Novolizer is also relatively independent of flow rate and the device shows better reproducibility of metering and delivery performance compared to the Turbuhaler. The low-to-medium airflow resistance means that the Novolizer is easy for patients to use correctly. Even children, patients with severe asthma and patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have no problems to generate the trigger inspiratory flow rate required to activate the Novolizer. The Novolizer uses an advanced DPI technology and may improve patient compliance.     

支气管哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠合并抑郁的临床研究

目的 探讨支气管哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠（ACO）合并抑郁的危险因素。方法 选取我院呼吸内科 2017年1月—2018年1月住院的稳定期ACO患者（ACO组，60例）、稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者（COPD组，59例）及 非急性发作期支气管哮喘患者（哮喘组，22例）。对ACO组、COPD组及哮喘组患者进行汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）-17 问卷调查，并检测患者第 1秒用力呼气容积占预计值百分比（FEV1%pred）和改良版英国医学研究会呼吸困难量表 （mMRC）。按HAMD-17评分将ACO组分为非抑郁组（HAMD-17评分≤7分，15例）及抑郁组（HAMD-17评分＞7分， 45例），分析 ACO 患者合并抑郁可能存在的危险因素。结果 ACO 组 HAMD-17评分高于 COPD 组和哮喘组（P＜ 0.05）。ACO患者中抑郁者 mMRC≥2级及 FEV1%pred＜50%者所占比例均高于非抑郁者（均 P＜0.05）。Logistic回归 分析结果显示，mMRC≥2级、FEV1%pred＜50%为 ACO患者发生抑郁的独立危险因素。结论 ACO合并抑郁的严重 程度较COPD及支气管哮喘更重，临床应注意对ACO患者进行抑郁的筛查工作。     

深吸气量和用力呼气量在支气管哮喘急性发作期的相关性研究

目的研究FEV1和FIV1在支气管哮喘急性发作期的相关性。方法观察支气管哮喘80例在吸入支气管扩张剂前后PEF,FEV1,FVC,FIV1和FIVC的变化。结果支气管哮喘患者PEF,FEV1和FIV1等指标,在吸入支气管扩张剂前后均有明显的差异,且FEV1改善率和FIV1改善率在统计学无差异。结论在评价支气管可逆性方面,FIV1与FEV1具有明显的相关性,两者具有同样的效果。