Quantitative dose-volume response analysis of changes in parotid gland function after radiotherapy in the head-and-neck region.

PURPOSE: To study the radiation tolerance of the parotid glands as a function of dose and volume irradiated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred eight patients treated with primary or postoperative radiotherapy for various malignancies in the head-and-neck region were prospectively evaluated. Stimulated parotid flow rate was measured before radiotherapy and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after radiotherapy. Parotid gland dose-volume histograms were derived from CT-based treatment planning. The normal tissue complication probability model proposed by Lyman was fit to the data. A complication was defined as stimulated parotid flow rate <25% of the preradiotherapy flow rate. RESULTS: The mean stimulated preradiotherapy flow rate of 174 parotid glands was 0.34 mL/min. The mean flow rate reduced to 0.12 mL/min 6 weeks postradiotherapy, but recovered to a mean flow rate of 0.20 mL/min at 1 year after radiotherapy. Reduction in postradiotherapy flow rate correlated significantly with mean parotid dose. No threshold dose was found. Increasing the irradiated volume of parotid glands from 0%-40% to 90-100% in patients with a mean parotid dose of 35-45 Gy resulted in a decrease in flow ratio from, respectively, approximately 100% to less than 10% 6 weeks after radiation. The flow ratio of the 90%-100% group partially recovered to 15% at 6 months and to 30% at 1 year after radiotherapy. The normal tissue complication probability model parameter TD(50) (the dose to the whole organ leading to a complication probability of 50%) was found to be 31, 35, and 39 Gy at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postradiotherapy, respectively. The volume dependency parameter n was around 1, which means that the mean parotid dose correlates best with the observed complications. There was no steep dose-response curve (m = 0.45 at 1 year postradiotherapy). CONCLUSIONS: This study on dose/volume/parotid gland function relationships revealed a linear correlation between postradiotherapy flow ratio and parotid gland dose and a strong volume dependency. No threshold dose was found. Recovery of parotid gland function was shown at 6 months and 1 year after radiotherapy. In radiation planning, attempts should be made to achieve a mean parotid gland dose at least below 39 Gy (leading to a complication probability of 50%).     

Volume effects and region-dependent radiosensitivity of the parotid gland

PURPOSE: To detect volume effects and possible regional differences in radiosensitivity of the rat parotid gland. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Parotid glands of male albino Wistar rats were locally X-irradiated, with collimators with conformal radiation portals used to supply 100% volume and 50% cranial/caudal partial volumes. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging was used to provide the outlines of the parotid glands. Single doses of up to 40 Gy were applied, and the effects on saliva secretion, measured with the aid of miniaturized Lashley cups, were followed up to 365 days after the irradiation. RESULTS: Under conditions of equal mean absorbed doses and small variations in dose distribution, a pertinent volume effect was observed for late but not for early radiation damage. The late effects were different for the cranial part as compared with the caudal part of the parotid gland. The reduction in flow rate was much more severe after irradiation in the cranial part. After a single dose of 30 Gy, the reductions in flow rates were approximately 65% and 25% for the cranial and caudal parts, respectively. At that dose, no saliva flow was observed after irradiation of 100% of the gland. CONCLUSION: From the rat model studies presented, it is concluded that late radiation damage after partial irradiation of parotid glands shows region-dependent volume effects. This finding is expected to be relevant to the radiosensitivity of human salivary glands, and it implies that the predictive power of the mean dose concept in radiotherapeutic practice is limited. The finding of region-dependent late radiation damage also challenges the basic assumptions of most current normal tissue complication probability models for parotid gland function.     

Scintigraphic assessment of early and late parotid gland function after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: a prospective study of dose-volume response relationships

PURPOSE: To investigate the value of scintigraphy as an indirect measurement of parotid function after radiotherapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ninety-six patients with primary or postoperative RT for various malignancies in the head-and-neck region were prospectively evaluated. Parotid gland scintigraphy was performed before RT and 6 weeks and 1 year after RT. The uptake, excretion fraction of the saliva from the parotid gland to the oral cavity (SEF), and the ratios of uptake and SEF after and before treatment were calculated. CT-based treatment planning was used to derive dose-volume histograms of the parotid glands. To establish the effects of both the radiation dose and the volume of the parotid gland irradiated, the normal tissue complication probability model proposed by Lyman was fit to the data. RESULTS: The mean maximal uptake of 192 parotid glands decreased significantly from 3329 counts (ct)-/s before RT to 3084 ct/s and 3005 ct/s at 6 weeks and 1 year after RT. The SEF before treatment was 44.7%. The SEF decreased to 18.7% at 6 weeks after RT, but recovered to a SEF of 32.4% at 1 year after RT. A significant correlation was found between the uptake 1 year after RT and the mean parotid dose. The reduction in post-RT SEF correlated significantly with the mean parotid gland dose. The normal tissue complication probability model parameter TD50 was found to be 29 and 43 Gy at 6 weeks and 1 year after RT, respectively, when a complication was defined as a posttreatment SEF parotid ratio of <45%. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of radiation on parotid gland function using scintigraphy could be well established. A statistically significant correlation between the SEF ratio and the mean parotid dose was shown, with some recovery of function at 1 year after RT, comparable with the flow results. When direct flow measurements are not feasible, parotid scintigraphy appears to be a good indicator of gland function.     

The influence of clinical factors on human stimulated parotid flow rate in cancer and other patients

Reduced salivary secretion can produce a wide variety of complaints, having a negative impact on the daily life of a patient. Multiple causes of salivary hypofunction are described, however, there are no consistent data about the influence of clinical parameters on parotid gland function. We studied a group of patients with head and neck malignancies before treatment with radiotherapy. We used Lashley cups to collect stimulated parotid saliva simultaneously from both parotid glands. Sizes of the parotid gland, gender, age, tobacco and alcohol consumption, and tumour characteristics were related to the function of the parotid gland. A considerable variability in parotid output was found with a range of 0.03-1.66 ml/min (mean 0.34 ml/min). None of the variables were correlated with parotid flow. These results are important, especially when evaluating effects of radiation on parotid gland function.     

Long-term parotid gland function after radiotherapy

PURPOSE: Irradiation of the parotid glands causes salivary dysfunction, resulting in reduced salivary flow. Recovery can be seen with time; however, long-term prospective data are lacking. The objective of this study was to analyze the long-term parotid gland function after irradiation for head-and-neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 52 patients with head-and-neck cancer and treated with radiotherapy (RT) were prospectively evaluated. Stimulated bilateral parotid salivary flow rates were measured before RT and 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and at least 3.5 years after RT completion. A complication was defined as a stimulated parotid flow rate of <25% of the pre-RT flow rate. The normal tissue complication probability model proposed by Lyman was fit to the data. Multilevel techniques were used to model the patterns of flow rates with time. RESULTS: The mean stimulated flow rate of the parotid glands before RT was 0.31 mL/min (standard deviation [SD], 0.21). This was reduced to 0.14 mL/min (SD, 0.15) at 6 weeks after RT and recovered to 0.20 mL/min (SD, 0.22) at 6 months and 0.19 mL/min (SD, 0.21) at 12 months after RT. The mean stimulated flow rate was 0.25 mL/min (SD, 0.28) 5 years after RT. The mean dose to the parotid gland resulting in a 50% complication probability increased from 34 Gy at 6 weeks to 40 Gy at 6 months, 42 Gy at 12 months, and 46 Gy at 5 years after RT. Multilevel modeling indicated that both dose and time were significantly associated with the flow ratio. CONCLUSION: Salivary output can still recover many years after RT. At 5 years after RT, we found an increase in the salivary flow rate of approximately 32% compared with at 12 months after RT.     

Scintigraphy in prediction of the salivary gland function after gland-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate salivary gland scintigraphy in prediction of salivary flow following radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer were treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy with an intention to spare the salivary gland function. The total quantitative saliva secretion was measured prior to and 6 and 12 months after therapy, and the function of the major salivary glands was monitored using Tc-99m-pertechnetate scintigraphy. Two models were designed for prediction of the post-treatment salivary flow: an average model, based on the average proportions of saliva produced by each of the four major glands in healthy subjects, and an individual model, based on saliva produced by each gland as measured by scintigraphy prior to therapy. These models were compared with volume-based (Lyman) normal tissue complication probability models using two published sets of model parameters. RESULTS: The D(50) for the parotid and the submandibular gland function assessed at 6 and 12 months after radiotherapy was approximately 39Gy. The scintigraphy-based individual model predicted well the measured post-treatment saliva flow rates. The correlation coefficient between the predicted stimulated and the measured saliva flow rate was 0.77 (p<0.0001) at 6 months and 0.55 (p=0.034) at 12 months after completion of radiotherapy. The relative changes in unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates showed similar dependency on the cumulative radiation dose. CONCLUSIONS: Salivary gland function assessed by scintigraphy prior to radiotherapy is useful in prediction of the residual salivary flow after radiotherapy.     

Comparison of radiosensitivity of rat parotid and submandibular glands after different radiation schedules.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate the radiosensitivity of rat parotid and submandibular gland functioning after local single dose, conventional fractionated and accelerated fractionated irradiation. METHODS: The salivary glands of male albino Wistar rats were locally irradiated with a single dose (15 Gy) or a calculated (alpha/beta; 9.6) biological effective dose of fractionated irradiation equal to this, viz. conventional fractionation (32 Gy in 16 fractions of 2 Gy/day, five times/week) or accelerated fractionation (32 Gy in 16 fractions of 2 Gy, two fractions/day). Parotid and submandibular/sublingual saliva samples were collected by means of miniaturized Lashley cups before and up to 240 days after irradiation. Salivary flow rate, lag phase and amylase secretion were used as parameters for the assessment of salivary gland function. At the end of the experiments the animals were sacrificed and the glands processed for histopathological examination. RESULTS: Up to 120 days after irradiation no differences were observed between the glands or between the different irradiation schedules. Beyond 120 days, however, the parotid gland performed better in flow rate and lag phase after fractionated irradiation, when compared to the submandibular gland. The observed differences in function corresponded with the observed late histopathological changes. The parotid gland contained more acinar cells and had a higher gland weight. No differences were observed between both fractionation schedules on each gland. CONCLUSIONS: The main observation from this study is the higher radiosensitivity of the submandibular gland compared to the parotid gland for late effects after fractionated irradiation. This may have implications for the treatment planning in case of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.     

Preservation of the rat parotid gland function after radiation by prophylactic pilocarpine treatment: radiation dose dependency and compensatory mechanisms.

PURPOSE: To study the ability of a prophylactic pilocarpine administration to preserve the rat parotid gland function after unilateral irradiation with graded doses of X-rays. METHODS: The right parotid gland of male albino Wistar rats was irradiated with single doses of X-rays (10-30 Gy, at 1.5 Gy min(-1)). Pilocarpine (4 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally, 1 hour prior to irradiation. Saliva samples of both left and right parotid gland were collected by means of miniaturized Lashley cups 4 days before and 3, 7, 10, and 30 days after irradiation. The parotid salivary flow rate (microl/min) was used as a parameter for the assessment of parotid gland function. RESULTS: Our data confirm that a single prophylactic treatment of pilocarpine can attenuate radiation-induced loss of gland function. Surprisingly, the effect of pilocarpine was not restricted to the irradiated gland only. Pilocarpine also enhanced the flow rate in the contralateral, nonirradiated gland. The latter effect was found for all doses above 10 Gy and became apparent around 7 days after the radiation treatment. The effectiveness of pilocarpine to attenuate function loss in the irradiated gland decreased with increasing dose and was lost after single doses of 30 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide direct evidence that increasing the compensatory potential of the nondamaged gland, at least in part, underlies the "radioprotective effect" of pilocarpine in case of unilateral radiation. The ability of pilocarpine to ameliorate the early radiation-induced impairment of the parotid gland function in the irradiated gland may therefore be dependent on the remaining number of functional cells, and thus on the volume of the gland that lies within the radiation portal.     

Evaluation of salivary gland function after treatment of head-and-neck tumors with intensity-modulated radiotherapy by quantitative pertechnetate scintigraphy

PURPOSE: To evaluate salivary gland function after inversely planned stereotactic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for tumors of the head-and-neck region using quantitative pertechnetate scintigraphy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Since January 2000, 18 patients undergoing IMRT for cancer of the head and neck underwent pre- and posttherapeutic scintigraphy to examine salivary gland function. The mean dose to the primary planning target volume was 61.5 Gy (range 50.4-73.2), and the median follow-up was 23 months. In all cases, the parotid glands were directly adjacent to the planning target volume. The treatment planning goal was for at least one parotid gland to receive a mean dose of <26 Gy. Two quantitative parameters (change in maximal uptake and change in the relative excretion rate before and after IMRT) characterizing the change in salivary gland function after radiotherapy were determined. These parameters were compared with respect to the dose thresholds of 26 and 30 Gy for the mean dose. In addition, dose-response curves were calculated. RESULTS: Using IMRT, it was possible in 16 patients to reduce the dose for at least one parotid gland to < or =26 Gy. In 7 patients, protection of both parotid glands was possible. No recurrent disease adjacent to the protected parotid glands was observed. Using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring system, only 3 patients had Grade 2 xerostomia. No greater toxicity was seen for the salivary glands. The change in the relative excretion rate was significantly greater, if the parotid glands received a mean dose of > or =26 Gy or > or =30 Gy. For the change in maximal uptake, a statistically significant difference was seen only for the parotid glands and a dose threshold of 30 Gy. For the end point of a reduction in the parotid excretion rate of >50% and 75%, the dose-response curves yielded a dose at 50% complication probability of 34.8 +/- 3.6 and 40.8 +/- 5.3 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSION: Using IMRT, it is possible to protect the parotid glands and reduce the incidence and severity of xerostomia in patients. Doses <26-30 Gy significantly preserve salivary gland function. The results support the hypothesis that application of IMRT does not lead to increased local failure rates.     

Dose-response relationships within the parotid gland after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the salivary function, after parotid-sparing radiotherapy (RT), of different regions within the parotid gland and to evaluate dose-function relationships within the parotid glands and between patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen head and neck cancer patients, irradiated between September 1999 and November 2000 using a conformal parotid-sparing technique, were included in this study. Before RT and 7 months after RT (range 6-10 months), a salivary gland scintigraphy was performed in all patients combined with a single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The salivary excretion fraction (SEF) was measured, after stimulation, in 8-12 transverse 5mm SPECT slices of each parotid. Loss of salivary excretion fraction (dSEF %) of these slices was calculated as the proportion of SEF after RT as compared to SEF before RT. Since the planning CT-scan and the SPECT-scintigraphy were performed in the same treatment position, the dose to a transverse slice within the parotid gland could be matched to the loss of salivary excretion fraction of that respective slice. A non-linear model was fitted to the dose-loss of function data and the dose resulting in 50% loss of salivary excretion fraction (D50) was calculated. RESULTS: Before RT, all but one patient presented with normal salivary excretion fractions (SEF) of both parotid glands. Within the same parotid gland, the SEF's of the different slices were almost equal. Seven months after RT, the reduction in SEF was statistically significant (P-value<0.0001). A significant difference in loss of salivary excretion fraction (dSEF) was also observed between both parotid glands (P<0.0001) as a result of the parotid-sparing technique. When plotting the dSEF of a slice versus the dose given to that slice, doses as low as 10-15 Gy could result in a serious loss of function (dSEF>50%). After fitting a non-linear model to these plots, the mean dose resulting in 50% loss of salivary excretion fraction (D50) 7 months after RT was 22.5 Gy. A large inter-patient variability was found in D50. CONCLUSIONS: Salivary SPECT is a useful tool for the evaluation of the salivary function of different slices within the parotid gland. Before irradiation, the different slices within one parotid gland act as functional sub-units contributing equally to the function of the entire gland. Seven months after an average dose of 22.5 Gy (D50) the functional sub-unit has lost 50% of its excretion fraction. The high inter-patient variability in D50 and the observation that low doses (10-15 Gy) can induce serious loss of function should prompt us in the clinic to reduce the dose to the parotids even lower than the threshold of 22.5 Gy.     

Parotid-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: preserved parotid function after IMRT on quantitative salivary scintigraphy, and comparison with historical data after conventional radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the parotid function after parotid-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From March 2003 to May 2004, 16 patients with nonmetastatic NPC underwent parotid-sparing IMRT. Eight of these patients had Stage III or IV NPC based on the 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. The post-IMRT parotid function was evaluated by quantitative salivary scintigraphy and represented by the maximal excretion ratio (MER) of the parotid gland after sialogogue stimulation. The parotid function of 16 NPC patients who were previously treated with conventional radiotherapy was reviewed as the historical control. RESULTS: In the parotid-sparing IMRT group, all 16 patients were alive and without cancer at the end of follow-up period (median, 24.2 months). The mean parotid MER was 53.5% before radiotherapy, 10.7% at 1 month post-IMRT, and 23.3% at 9 months post-IMRT. In the conventional radiotherapy group, the mean parotid MER was 0.6% at 6 to 12 months postradiotherapy. The difference was statistically significant (23.3% vs. 0.6%, p<0.001, Mann-Whitney test). In the IMRT group, the mean parotid doses ranged from 33.2 Gy to 58.8 Gy (average, 43.9 Gy). The correlation between the mean parotid dose and the percentage decrease of parotid MER at 9 months post-IMRT (dMER) was statically significant (p=0.008, Pearson correlation). CONCLUSIONS: Although the mean parotid doses are relatively high, the significant preservation of parotid function is achieved with IMRT for NPC patients. The significant correlation between mean parotid dose and parotid dMER demonstrates the dose-function relationship of the parotid gland.     

唾液腺显像对鼻咽癌放疗后腮腺功能的评价

目的探讨唾液腺显像对鼻咽癌放疗后腮腺功能的评价。方法对40例鼻咽癌行适形调强放疗（30例）及常规放疗（10例）的患者,分别于放疗前、放疗结束时及放疗后5个月作口干程度的比较及唾液腺功能显像榆查。结果放疗结束时患苦出现不同程度口干症状,放疗后5个月,部分患者口千症状有明显改善。唾液腺受损后腮腺显像图像征象及时问放射性曲线均有变化。放疗结束时腮腺定量分析摄取指数（UI）及分泌指数（E1）均比放疗前低（P〈0．05）,但适形调强放疗组的UI及EI均比常规放疗组高（P〈0．05）。结论适形凋强放疗可以有效保护腮腺功能,唾液腺显像可用于监测鼻咽癌放疗后腮腺功能变化。     

Preservation of parotid function with uncomplicated conformal radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate (1) parotid function, (2) subjective xerostomia and (3) pattern of relapses after conformal parotid-sparing radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. (4) To study dose-response curves of parotid glands. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From September 1999 to November 2000, 39 head and neck cancer patients requiring bilateral neck RT were treated with a fairly simple conformal RT technique (three-field set-up+anterior lower neck field; two opposed oblique boost fields). The contralateral parotid was spared. Parotid function was assessed by salivary gland scintigraphies performed before, early (median 4 weeks) and late (median 28 weeks) after RT. Xerostomia was monitored by visual analogue scales (VAS) and LENT SOMA scores. Location of locoregional recurrences was studied in relation to the radiation fields. A dose-response curve of parotids was created using logistic regression. RESULTS: (1) Early after RT, on salivary gland scintigraphy, the mean loss of secretion function in the spared parotid was 67% and total in the non-spared. Late after RT, the mean loss remained 19% in the spared and total in the non-spared parotid. Normal excretion function was regained in 75% of the spared parotids. (2) Late after RT, 78% of patients had no, minimal or acceptable subjective xerostomia. (3) No recurrence was seen near the spared parotid (11/39 locoregional recurrences). (4) The dose-response curve of parotids showed that the mean parotid dose should preferentially be < or =20 Gy, to obtain a good chance (> or =70%) for preservation of its function on scintigraphy. CONCLUSIONS: An easy conformal parotid-sparing RT technique prevents moderate or severe subjective xerostomia in 78% of patients. In the spared parotids, nearly complete to complete recovery is obtained after 6-12 months.     

Factors influencing the parotid function in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with parotid-sparing radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the factors influencing post-irradiation parotid gland function in nasopharyngeal cancer treated with parotid-sparing radiotherapy. METHODS: This study consisted of 45 patients with nasopharyngeal cancer treated with radiotherapy including 3D conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The mean follow-up time was 37.5 months (range: 15-50 months). Objective parotid gland function was assessed by series sialoscintigraphy pre-irradiation and post-irradiation at 1, 6, 12 and 18 months. Subjective salivary function was recorded by the LENT/SOMA system. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the secretion ratio (SR) of parotid gland before and after treatment. Mann-Whitney rank-sum test was used to determine the factors influencing the post-irradiated SR. Chi-square test was used to compare the correlation between subjective grading of xerostomia and objective grading of parotid glands. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the pre-irradiation and post-irradiation parotid gland's SR at 1 (0.30 versus 0.01, P < 0.05) and 6 months (0.03 versus 0.08, P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference compared with the pre-irradiation SR at 12 (0.30 versus 0.20, P > 0.05) and 18 months (0.30 versus 0.18, P > 0.05). There was significant correlation between subjective and objective salivary function (P = 0.024) at 12 months after radiotherapy. The factor that impacted the preservation of parotid function was mean dose to the parotid gland >38.0 Gy (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that parotid function could recover 1 year after treatment with parotid-sparing radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer. The most important factor that influenced parotid function was the mean dose to the parotid gland.     

11C-methionine PET, a novel method for measuring regional salivary gland function after radiotherapy of head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Loss of salivary gland function is a distressing side-effect of radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. The aim of this study was to develop a positron emission tomography (PET) method for measuring regional salivary gland function in the major salivary glands irradiated during RT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight head and neck cancer patients were included; two were examined before RT and six after parotid sparing RT. Patients were examined by dynamic 11C-methionine PET of the major salivary glands and parotid gland salivary flow measurements. PET data were analysed using a kinetic model of salivary gland 11C-methionine metabolism, in which salivary gland function was quantified by the net metabolic clearance of 11C-methionine, K. Functional voxel-wise images of K were calculated and matched with the CT-dose-plan for comparing regional salivary gland function with the regional radiation dose. RESULTS: Parotid gland K correlated positively with parotid gland salivary flow, indicating that K can be used as an index of salivary gland function. K of parotid and submandibular glands was reduced dependent on the median radiation dose. In one patient, receiving a heterogeneous radiation dose to the parotid glands, regional salivary gland function was inversely correlated to the regional radiation dose. CONCLUSIONS: Salivary gland function can be measured by dynamic 11C-methionine PET. The net metabolic clearance of 11C-methionine of salivary glands was reduced dependent on the radiation dose. Dynamic 11C-methionine PET offers a method for studying the individual response of the major salivary glands to irradiation.     

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy significantly reduces xerostomia compared with conventional radiotherapy

PURPOSE: Xerostomia is a severe complication after radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer, as the salivary glands are in close proximity with the primary tumor. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) offers theoretical advantages for normal tissue sparing. A Phase II study was conducted to determine the value of IMRT for salivary output preservation compared with conventional radiotherapy (CRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 56 patients with oropharyngeal cancer were prospectively evaluated. Of these, 30 patients were treated with IMRT and 26 with CRT. Stimulated parotid salivary flow was measured before, 6 weeks, and 6 months after treatment. A complication was defined as a stimulated parotid flow rate <25% of the preradiotherapy flow rate. RESULTS: The mean dose to the parotid glands was 48.1 Gy (SD 14 Gy) for CRT and 33.7 Gy (SD 10 Gy) for IMRT (p < 0.005). The mean parotid flow ratio 6 weeks and 6 months after treatment was respectively 41% and 64% for IMRT and respectively 11% and 18% for CRT. As a result, 6 weeks after treatment, the number of parotid flow complications was significantly lower after IMRT (55%) than after CRT (87%) (p = 0.002). The number of complications 6 months after treatment was 56% for IMRT and 81% for CRT (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: IMRT significantly reduces the number of parotid flow complications for patients with oropharyngeal cancer.     

Optimisation of radiotherapy for carcinoma of the parotid gland: a comparison of conventional, three-dimensional conformal, and intensity-modulated techniques.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare external beam radiotherapy techniques for parotid gland tumours using conventional radiotherapy (RT), three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). To optimise the IMRT techniques, and to produce an IMRT class solution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The planning target volume (PTV), contra-lateral parotid gland, oral cavity, brain-stem, brain and cochlea were outlined on CT planning scans of six patients with parotid gland tumours. Optimised conventional RT and 3DCRT plans were created and compared with inverse-planned IMRT dose distributions using dose-volume histograms. The aim was to reduce the radiation dose to organs at risk and improve the PTV dose distribution. A beam-direction optimisation algorithm was used to improve the dose distribution of the IMRT plans, and a class solution for parotid gland IMRT was investigated. RESULTS: 3DCRT plans produced an equivalent PTV irradiation and reduced the dose to the cochlea, oral cavity, brain, and other normal tissues compared with conventional RT. IMRT further reduced the radiation dose to the cochlea and oral cavity compared with 3DCRT. For nine- and seven-field IMRT techniques, there was an increase in low-dose radiation to non-target tissue and the contra-lateral parotid gland. IMRT plans produced using three to five optimised intensity-modulated beam directions maintained the advantages of the more complex IMRT plans, and reduced the contra-lateral parotid gland dose to acceptable levels. Three- and four-field non-coplanar beam arrangements increased the volume of brain irradiated, and increased PTV dose inhomogeneity. A four-field class solution consisting of paired ipsilateral coplanar anterior and posterior oblique beams (15, 45, 145 and 170 degrees from the anterior plane) was developed which maintained the benefits without the complexity of individual patient optimisation. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with parotid gland tumours, reduction in the radiation dose to critical normal tissues was demonstrated with 3DCRT compared with conventional RT. IMRT produced a further reduction in the dose to the cochlea and oral cavity. With nine and seven fields, the dose to the contra-lateral parotid gland was increased, but this was avoided by optimisation of the beam directions. The benefits of IMRT were maintained with three or four fields when the beam angles were optimised, but were also achieved using a four-field class solution. Clinical trials are required to confirm the clinical benefits of these improved dose distributions.     

Dose de tolérance à l’irradiation des tissus sains : les glandes salivaires

Xerostomia is one of the most a common complication of radiotherapy for head and neck cancers, affecting quality of life. Parotid glands produce approximately 60% of saliva and submandibular glands 20% of saliva while the rest is secreted by sublingual and accessory salivary glands. Methods of measuring the salivary output are collection of unstimulated or stimulated saliva or 99mTc-pertechnate scintigraphy. Several studies demonstrated that late salivary dysfunction after radiotherapy has been correlated to the mean parotid gland dose, with recovery occurring with time. Severe xerostomia could be avoided if at one parotid gland is spared to a mean dose of less than approximately 25–30 Gy. Clinical benefit of submandibular gland sparing is more controversial. A mean dose less than 39 Gy could preserve submandibular gland function. This paper aims to review main studies evaluating tolerance dose of salivary glands.