The Influence of Fluoride-releasing Bonding Composites in the Development of Artificial White Spot Lesions. An Ex Vivo Study

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of fluoride-releasing bonding composites on the development of artificially created white spot lesions ex vivo. The severity of the lesions was estimated visually using the von der Fehr Caries Index. The integrated mineral loss of the lesions (Δz) was measured using micro-radiography/microdensitometry. The results of the visual assessment indicated that teeth bonded with Reliance® exhibited more Grade 2 lesions than expected. Teeth bonded with Mirage Dual Cure®, however, showed a high prevalence of teeth with no lesions (Grade 0) and few with Grade 2. Microdensitometric analysis found 17 subsurface lesions; 14 of these were in the non-fluoridated groups (Right-On® and Heliosit®), and 3 and 1 in the fluoridated groups (Reliance® and Mirage Dual Cure®), respectively. Lesion mineral content ranged from 64·93 to 20·43 per cent for Right-On®, from 32·53 to 26·72 per cent for Heliosit®, from 19·52 to 19·58 per cent for Reliance®, and 23·58 per cent for Mirage Dual Cure®. The results of this study suggest that fluoride-releasing composites may have a caries preventive effect around orthodontic brackets.     

Development of a sustained fluoride delivery system

Objective:To develop a novel delivery system by which fluoride incorporated into elastomeric rings, such as those used to ligate orthodontic wires, will be released in a controlled and constant manner.Materials and Methods:Polyethylene co-vinyl acetate (PEVA) was used as the model elastomer. Samples (N  =  3) were prepared by incorporating 0.02 to 0.4 g of sodium fluoride (NaF) into previously prepared PEVA solution. Another group of samples prepared in the same manner were additionally dip-coated in PEVA to create an overcoat. Fluoride release studies were conducted in vitro using an ion selective electrode over a period of 45 days. The amount of fluoride released was compared to the optimal therapeutic dose of 0.7 µg F⁻/ring/d.Results:Only coated samples with the highest fluoride content (group D, 0.4 g of NaF) were able to release fluoride at therapeutic levels. When fluoride release from coated and uncoated samples with the same amount of NaF were compared, it was shown that the dip-coating technique resulted in a fluoride release in a controlled manner while eliminating the initial burst effect.Conclusions:This novel fluoride delivery matrix provided fluoride release at a therapeutically effective rate and profile.     

Long-term fluoride release of some orthodontic bonding resins: a laboratory study.

OBJECTIVES: The present study compared the amounts and profiles of long term fluoride release from four commercial direct bonding resins (Light-Bond, Reliance Orthodontic Products; Rely.a.Bond, Reliance Orthodontic Products; Orthon, Orthon Dental Inc.; Fluor Ever, Macro-Chem Corporation) and one glass ionomer cement (Ketac-Cem, Espe). METHODS: The specimens were equilibrated in double-deionized water at 37 degrees C. At predetermined intervals, and up to 560 days, the fluoride concentration of the equilibrated solution was determined with a fluoride ion selective electrode. For Light-Bond and Rely.a.Bond two batches were studied and the amount of fluoride released in a 0.1 mol/L NaCl solution was also determined. Differences in the fluoride release profiles due to batch, type of solution and time were determined with a three-factor mixed design ANOVA with repeated measures on one factor. RESULTS: The fluoride release profiles of the orthodontic adhesives studied differ markedly. Initially, Fluor Ever and Ketac-Cem release comparable amounts of fluoride which are greater than those released by Orthon. After a few weeks the amounts of fluoride released by Ketac-Cem and Orthon become comparable, but are considerably higher than those released by Fluor Ever. During the first days of the elution, the amount of fluoride released by Light-Bond equals that of Orthon, but then decreases below the determination limit of the analytical method within half a year. No difference was found between the fluoride release profiles in water and the NaCl solution. However, the fluoride release profiles apparently depend on the batch. For Rely.a.Bond, the amount of fluoride released is smaller than the detection limit for the fluoride analysis. SIGNIFICANCE: The fluoride release of the orthodontic adhesives investigated markedly depends on the mechanisms responsible for the fluoride release process.     

Fluoride release/uptake of glass-ionomer cements and polyacid-modified composite resins

The aim of this study was to investigate the fluoride release and fluoride recharge behaviors of two conventional glass-ionomer cements (GICs) and two polyacid-modified composite resins (PMCRs) after exposure to mouthwash and toothpaste. Fluoride released from the materials was measured at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th days. At 28th day, the specimens were divided into three groups. Specimens in the control group were stored in deionized water. For the other two groups, the specimens were exposed to 0.05% NaF solution and fluoridated toothpaste for one month. After refluoridation, fluoride amount was measured at 30th, 31st, 32nd, 36th, 44th, 52nd, and 60th days. All materials released fluoride. The highest amount of fluoride was obtained during the first 24 hours, and there was a statistically significant difference between the amounts of fluoride released from GICs and PMCRs (p < 0.0001). After exposure to mouthwash and fluoridated toothpaste, all materials were recharged and continued releasing fluoride. While the amount of fluoride release from the materials increased after reflouridation, the increase was higher in GICs.     

Characterisation of a Bioactive SiO2-CaO-CaF2-Na2O Glass Used in Composites

ObjectivesTo characterise the ion release, pH changes and apatite formation of a phosphate free bioactive glass.MethodsA SiO₂-CaO-CaF₂-Na₂O glass was synthesized by a melt route with a composition close to the reactive glass in the commercial Cention N® composite. The glass was characterized after immersion in three media: Artificial Saliva pH4 (AS4) Artificial Saliva pH7 (AS7) and in a high phosphate artificial saliva at pH6.5 (AS6.5). The pH and fluoride release were measured using a pH meter and an ion selective electrode. The concentration of Ca, P, Na and Si were measured by ICP-OES. The glass powders after immersion were characterized by FTIR, X-ray powder diffraction and ¹⁹F MAS-NMR.ResultsThe glass increased the pH in all three media. Fluoride was detected in all three media but was much higher in AS 6.5. Calcium fluoride formed in AS4 with a small amount of fluorapatite at long immersion times. Fluorapatite and calcium fluoride formed in AS7, whilst in AS6.5 fluorapatite formed.The ion concentrations in solution after immersion reflected the glass composition and the immersion media with fluorapatite being favoured by higher pHs and phosphate contents in the media.SignificanceThe results demonstrated the ability of the glass to increase the pH and to form fluorapatite in phosphate containing media. This may explain the low incidence of secondary caries found in the commercial composite. Unlike the commercial composite evidence was found for the precipitation of fluorite, which will act to reduce the release of fluoride for preventing secondary caries.     

Effects of different fluoride recharging protocols on fluoride ion release from various orthodontic adhesives

Objective

The purpose of this study was to find the most effective fluoride recharging protocol for orthodontic adhesives.

Methods

Five orthodontic adhesives were used: a non-fluoride-releasing composite, a fluoride-releasing composite, a polyacid-modified composite (compomer), and two resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (RMGICs). Each specimen was placed into deionized water (DW) and the initial fluoride ion release was measured for 2 months. Each specimen was then subjected to four different treatments to simulate a fluoride recharge: 1000 ppm NaF solution, acidulated phosphate fluoride gel (APF), fluoride-containing dentifrice and DW (control). After topical fluoride treatment, each specimen was submitted to fluoride re-release tests.

Results

Fluoride-containing adhesives initially showed higher rates of fluoride ion release, but significantly declined to lower levels. The overall cumulative fluoride ion release during the initial period was RMGICs > compomer > fluoride-containing composite > non-fluoride-releasing composite. After topical fluoride treatment, the amount of fluoride ion re-released was proportional to the amount of fluoride ion previously released from the adhesives. However, the amount of fluoride ions released only lasted for 2 days and then returned to the levels before fluoride application. The overall cumulative fluoride ion re-release according to the fluoride treatments was APF and NaF solution > dentifrice.

Conclusion

This study suggests that using the combination of RMGICs and a fluoride-containing mouth rinse solution is the most effective protocol for long-term fluoride re-release from orthodontic adhesives, given the difficulty of routine use of APF at home, although all topical fluoride treatments can recharge fluoride ion in adhesives.     

Fluoride release by silicate cements and composite resins

abstract – The purpose of the study was to determine the fluoride content of acrylic and composite resins and to study the release of fluoride from these materials in comparison to the release from silicates. The analytical results showed that one composite contained approximately the same amount of fluoride as is generally reported for silicates. The other resins contained none or only minimal amounts of fluoride. The release of fluoride was studied by measuring the uptake of fluoride by synthetic hydroxylapatite. Rectangular test specimens, 2 × 2 × 12 mm, made of the fluoride-containing resin were shaken in a neutral (pH 6.8) and an acidic (pH 5.8) solution with the hydroxylapatite for 7 weeks. The apatite was analyzed for fluoride each week and the test specimens were then transferred to a fresh solution with new apatite. As a control, a composite without fluoride was studied in the same way. For comparison two silicate cements were also included in the study. The results show that, during the first week, the uptake of fluoride by the apatite was greater from the silicates than it was from the composite. After that period the uptake continued at a lower level and did not show any marked decrease during the observation period. This continued uptake was about the same from both the silicates and the composite.     

Fluoride release of polyacid-modified composite resins with and without bonding agents.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the proprietary bonding agents Hytac OSB (OSB) (Espe), Prime&Bond 2.1 (PB) (Dentsply DeTrey) and Syntac Single Component (SSC) (Vivadent) on the fluoride release of the corresponding polyacid-modified composite resins Hytac (HTC), Dyract AP (DAP) and Compoglass F (CGF), respectively. METHODS: Ten cylindrical specimens (6mm diameter and 3mm thick) of each polyacid-modified composite were prepared according to the manufacturers' instructions: five with bonding agent applied and five without bonding agent as a control. The specimens were immersed individually in 10ml ultra-pure water at 37 degrees C immediately after light-curing of the polyacid-modified composite resins. Over 140 days, the water was regularly renewed and the fluoride concentration eluted during each period was determined with a combined fluoride ion selective electrode. RESULTS: The fluoride release decreases according to the sequence: CGF>DAP>HTC. The bonding agent significantly reduces the fluoride released by DAP and CGF, respectively, by a factor 2-3 and +/-1.4. For HTC, the bonding agent reduces the fluoride released initially by a factor of +/-2, but the difference between the fluoride release with and without bonding agent becomes insignificant after approximately 3 weeks. SIGNIFICANCE: It can be concluded that the use of bonding agent can significantly reduce fluoride release of polyacid-modified composite resins in the long-term, and especially in the short-term. The decrease in fluoride release might reduce the material's potential to prevent recurrent caries.     

Fluoride release and uptake characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials

The aims of this study were firstly to investigate the fluoride-releasing characteristics of two composite resins (Tetric and Valux Plus), two polyacid-modified resin composites (Compoglass and Dyract), and conventional glass-ionomer cement (Ceramfil beta). The second aim was to assess the fluoride uptake and subsequent release from the same range of materials. Fifteen discs (6 mm diameter and 1.5 mm height) were prepared for each material. Each disc was immersed in 4 ML of deionized water within a plastic vial. The release of fluoride was measured daily at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 30 and 60 days. After daily fluoride release was measured for 60 days, samples were refluoridated in 1000-ppm sodium fluoride (NaF) solutions (pH 6.6) for 10 min and fluoride release was measured daily for a total of 5 days. The release of fluoride from aesthetic restorative materials was measured by using specific fluoride electrode and an ionanalyser. Results were statistically analysed by two-way repeated measure ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test. The results revealed that all fluoride-containing materials (Ceramfil beta, Compoglass, Dyract, Tetric) released fluoride initially and the release was greatest at the first day. At any time during the test period Ceramfil beta released the most and Valux Plus did not release any detectable fluoride (P < 0.01). Sample exposures to 1000 ppm NaF solution increased the 24-h fluoride release from all fluoride-containing materials. This difference lasted only 24-48 h after exposure. Ceramfil beta had a tendency to recharge not seen with the other materials (P < 0.05).     

Fluoride release from three glass ionomers, a compomer, and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid

The amounts and the pattern of fluoride release from one metal-reinforced glass ionomer cement, two resin-modified glass ionomer cements, one compomer, and one composite resin placed in double-distilled water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid were evaluated in this study. Measurements of fluoride ion release were made for a total of 105 cylindrical specimens (10 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm in height). They were taken over a period of 16 weeks at the intervals of 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours, as well as 2, 3, 7, 14, 28, 56, and 112 days. The pattern of fluoride release was similar for all of the examined materials. The greatest amount of fluoride was released from the metal-reinforced glass ionomer Argion. The resin-modified glass ionomers Vitremer, Fuji II LC; the compomer Dyract; and the composite resin Tetric followed in ranking order. The pH of the environment strongly affected the fluoride release from the materials. There was a significant difference (P < 0.001) in the amounts of fluoride released in lactic acid vs water and artificial saliva, whereas, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the amounts of fluoride released in water vs artificial saliva.     

Evaluation of Fluoride Release in Chitosan-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements

ObjectiveThis study assessed the influence of chitosan nanoparticles on the fluoride-releasing ability of 4 glass ionomer cement (GIC) through an in vitro analysis.MethodsFour types of GIC (type II light cure universal restorative, type II universal restorative, GC Fuji VII, and type IX) were modified with nanochitosan particles; 10% chitosan was added to the glass ionomer liquid. Six specimens for each of the 4 groups were created, using expendable Teflon moulds. Discs of each type of GIC (n = 6) were immersed in deionised water at various time intervals. Electrodes selective for fluoride ions were employed to analyse the amount of released fluoride at 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days.ResultsChitosan-modified GICs showed greater fluoride release than conventional GICs at all time points. All samples showed an initial high release of fluoride that tapered off with time. The total amount of fluoride released increased from the 1st day to the 28th day on adding chitosan to all the 4 types of GIC. Amongst those, type IX high-strength posterior extra with chitosan released a considerably higher quantity of fluoride at all time intervals.ConclusionsIn all the experimental groups, adding chitosan to the glass ionomer liquid had an accelerating effect on its fluoride-releasing property.     

Effects of periodic fluoride treatment on fluoride ion release from fresh orthodontic adhesives

Objective

Periodic fluoride treatment may contribute to the ability of fresh orthodontic adhesives to provide long-term F⁻ release. The effects of periodic fluoride treatment on the amount of F⁻ release from fresh orthodontic adhesives was investigated.

Methods

F⁻ release was measured from a nonfluoride-releasing composite, a fluoride-releasing composite, a polyacid-modified composite (compomer), and two resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (RMGICs) at 1, 2, and 5 days after one of the following treatments: 225 ppm F⁻ solution, 900 ppm F⁻ solution, acidulated phosphate fluoride gel (APF), fluoridated dentifrice, and deionised water (control). F⁻ release was measured in a 5-day cycle, which was repeated 9 consecutive times. The amount of F⁻ release for each group was analysed using the repeated measures analysis of variance. Statistical significance was set at a level of α = 0.05.

Results

Periodic fluoride treatment temporarily increased F⁻ release in fresh fluoride-releasing orthodontic adhesives, but not in fresh nonfluoride-releasing composite. The order of effective fluoride-release was RMGICs > compomer > fluoride-releasing composite > nonfluoride-releasing composite. The application of APF or 900 ppm F⁻ solution was the most effective way to maintain F⁻ release from fresh orthodontic adhesives. However, the amount of F⁻ release gradually decreased with increasing specimen age.

Conclusion

Given the difficulty of routine use of APF at home, the results of this study show that a combination of RMGICs and high-dose fluoride mouth rinse is the most effective protocol to maintain F⁻ release from fresh orthodontic adhesives.

Clinical significance

Most studies have investigated fluoride-uptake abilities using aged materials in which fluoride had been lost for at least 1 month. This study has found that periodic fluoride treatment altered the conventional F⁻ release pattern of fresh fluoride-releasing materials and type of fluoride-containing medium plays a more critical role in fluoride recharging of the materials than fluoride concentration. This study will help clinicians to find the most effective fluoride treatment protocol of fresh materials.     

含氟复合树脂释氟对材料挠曲强度的影响

目的：研究含氟复合树脂释氟对材料本身机械性能的影响。方法：选择不同氟含量的含氟树脂,以氟电极法连续30d测定含氟复合树脂体外释氟量。万能试验机测定含氟复合树脂释氟30d前后的挠曲强度。结果：含氟树脂氟含量越高（重量比分别为0％、0．3％、0．6％和1．2％）,初期释氟量越大（分别为0、21．98、43．98和99．91μg.cm^-2),相应挠曲强度越低（分别为101．70、94．29、82．03和79．84MPa）。随着含氟复合树脂释氟量的增加,材料的挠曲强度相应降低。结论：含氟树脂释氟对其机械性能有一定影响。     

Fluoride release and uptake from glass ionomer cements and composite resins

The aim of this investigation was to evaluate fluoride release and uptake from 4 glass ionomer cements (GICs)--Vitremer (VIT), Fuji II LC (FII LC), Fuji IX (FIX), Chelon Fill (CHE)--and 2 composite resins (CRs)--Heliomolar (H) and Zeta-100 (Z-100). Eight discs (8 mm x 2 mm) were made of each material and were stored in plastic vials containing artificial saliva at 37 degrees C. In group 1 (N = 3), the specimens were immersed in artificial saliva which was changed daily for 25 days. In group 2 (N = 5), besides receiving the same treatment as group 1, the specimens were immersed, after 24 hours, in a fluoride solution (1% NaF) for 1 min before daily saliva change. An ion-specific electrode (9609 BN-Orion) connected to an ion analyzer (SA-720 Procyon) was used to determine the amount of fluoride released at days 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25. Data were analyzed using two way ANOVA and Friedman's test. GICs released more fluoride during the first day and after this period the mean fluoride released decreased. Composite resin H released fluoride during the first day only and Z-100 did not release fluoride. In terms of NaF treatment, CRs did not show fluoride uptake, whereas the GICs showed fluoride uptake (VIT = FII LC = CHE > FIX).     

Surface Roughness of Composite Resins Before and After Finishing

The surface roughness before and after polishing with sand paper discs, cuttlefish discs, and aqueous suspensions of pumice was studied on 6 composite resins (Adaptic ®, Addent 12 ®, Blendant®, Dakor®, D.F.R.® and TD 71®) and two reference materials (Sevriton Simplified® and Biotrey®), with an apparatus, type Perth-O-Meter S4 BD Lowener, where mechanical registrations of the surface profiles were made. The sources of variance used were operators (2), strips (2), test pieces (2), materials (8) and surface treatments (4).

The results, as given by the CLA- and R^MAX-values of the studied surfaces, indicate that the brands of composite resins investigated differed in surface roughness both directly after setting and after the three different types of surface grinding used. The main finding, however, was that no type of grinding could produce as plane surfaces as that found after the resins had set under strips.

When the composite resins as a group were compared with a silicate cement they seemed to have smoother surfaces, especially when no grinding had been performed. When compared with polymethylmethacrylate they seemed to have about the same grade of surface roughness after setting. After grinding, however, most of the tested composite resins had rougher surfaces.     

Release and recharge of fluoride by restorative materials

This study investigated the release and recharge of fluoride by restorative materials. Resin-modified glass ionomers (RGIs), polyacid-modified composite resins (PMCRs) and resin composite containing fluoride were used for comparison of fluoride release. Non-fluoride-releasing resin composite was used as a control. The amounts of fluoride release from RGIs and PMCRs remarkably increased in the citrate-phosphate acid buffer compared with distilled water. The amounts of fluoride recharged in RGIs increased with the concentration of NaF solution, but those of PMCRs exposed to all concentrations of NaF solutions were less than 1.5 ppm. Neither resin composite containing fluoride and non-fluoride-releasing resin composite gave any evidence of recharge. RGIs and PMCRs affected by acid buffer solution could not recharge much fluoride even if they were immersed in the 1000 ppmF NaF solution. The results suggested that the matrix of RGIs and PMCRs functioned as a reservoir of fluoride, but the functions were lost by acid attack.     

Effect of Alcoholic and Low-pH Soft Drinks on Fluoride Release from Compomer

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of fluoride released from compomer restorative materials after immersion in various media. Materials and Methods: In this test, four materials were used: three compomers (Dyract, Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany; Compoglass, Vivadent, Schaan, Principality of Liechtenstein; and Xeno, Sankins, Tochigi, Japan) and one resin‐modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC, GC, Tokyo, Japan). There were four test solutions: one alcoholic (whiskey), two low‐pH drinks (Coca‐Cola, orange juice), and one deionized water. Over a period of 60 days, the tested specimens were immersed in the test solution for 3 hours every day, then kept in deionized water. The fluoride released was detected by using a fluoride ion selective electrode connected to a microprocessor ion analyzer. The fluoride ion concentration (ppm) of the test solutions and deionized water was recorded after 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 30, and 60 days. Electron probe microanalysis was used for surface analysis of the fluoride released. Results: When immersed in low‐pH soft drinks, compomer showed a significantly higher fluoride release than when immersed in deionized water (p <.0001). For specimens immersed in Coca‐Cola, the fluoride release levels (pg/cm², mean ± SD) at 1, 7, and 60 days for Dyract (91.6 ± 1.8, 39.3 ± 3.1, 10.5 ± 0.9), Compoglass (129.5 ± 0.9, 66.5 ± 2.7, 19.0 ± 0.3), Fuji II LC (147.0 ± 4.2, 50.8 ± 3.1, 27.6 ± 3.0), and Xeno (73.6 ± 3.2, 27.3 ± 2.1, 6.6 ± 0.6) demonstrated the trend of significantly lower releases with time in water solution. Over a 60‐day period, materials immersed in 100% orange juice released the highest amount of fluoride, which could be attributable to the erosive effect of the medium. Materials immersed in deionized water released the least amount of fluoride. Among the tested compomers, Compoglass released the most fluoride. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The results of this study indicate that, at low pH, compomer restorative materials tend to release more fluoride.     

Ion release from,and fluoride recharge of a composite with a fluoride-containing bioactive glass

Objectives

Materials that are capable of releasing ions such as calcium and fluoride, that are necessary for remineralization of dentin and enamel, have been the topic of intensive research for many years. The source of calcium has most often been some form of calcium phosphate, and that for fluoride has been one of several metal fluoride or hexafluorophosphate salts. Fluoride-containing bioactive glass (BAG) prepared by the sol–gel method acts as a single source of both calcium and fluoride ions in aqueous solutions. The objective of this investigation was to determine if BAG, when added to a composite formulation, can be used as a single source for calcium and fluoride ion release over an extended time period, and to determine if the BAG-containing composite can be recharged upon exposure to a solution of 5000 ppm fluoride.

Methods

BAG 61 (61% Si; 31% Ca; 4% P; 3% F; 1% B) and BAG 81 (81% Si; 11% Ca; 4% P; 3% F; 1% B) were synthesized by the sol–gel method. The composite used was composed of 50/50 Bis-GMA/TEGDMA, 0.8% EDMAB, 0.4% CQ, and 0.05% BHT, combined with a mixture of BAG (15%) and strontium glass (85%) to a total filler load of 72% by weight. Disks were prepared, allowed to age for 24 h, abraded, then placed into DI water. Calcium and fluoride release was measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy and fluoride ion selective electrode methods, respectively, after 2, 22, and 222 h. The composite samples were then soaked for 5 min in an aqueous 5000 ppm fluoride solution, after which calcium and fluoride release was again measured at 2, 22, and 222 h time points.

Results

Prior to fluoride recharge, release of fluoride ions was similar for the BAG 61 and BAG 81 composites after 2 h, and also similar after 22 h. At the four subsequent time points, one prior to, and three following fluoride recharge, the BAG 81 composite released significantly more fluoride ions (p < 0.05). Both composites were recharged by exposure to 5000 ppm fluoride, although the BAG 81 composite was recharged more than the BAG 61 composite. The BAG 61 composite released substantially more calcium ions prior to fluoride recharge during each of the 2 and 22 h time periods. Thereafter, the release of calcium at the four subsequent time points was not significantly different (p > 0.05) for the two composites.

Significance

These results show that, when added to a composite formulation, fluoride-containing bioactive glass made by the sol–gel route can function as a single source for both calcium and fluoride ions, and that the composite can be readily recharged with fluoride.     

Effect of toothbrushing on fluoride release of polyacid-modified composite resins

The aim of the study was to evaluate the fluoride release of polyacid-modified composite resins (Dyract, Compoglass) submitted to brushing abrasion. Twenty samples were taken from each material and stored in a buffer solution (pH 4.0) for 12 days. Each day, the samples were transferred to a fresh solution. Ten samples of each material were brushed in an automatic tooth-brushing machine (250 strokes, 260-g load) every fourth day. The remaining samples were not subjected to brushing. Fluoride content of the solutions was measured with a fluoride sensitive electrode after the addition of TISAB. Statistical analysis demonstrated significant differences between the two materials with regard to cumulative fluoride release within the 12 days of the experiment. However, no difference was observed between the fluoride release of the brushed samples compared to the unbrushed specimens. This was true for both, the cumulative fluoride release and its release on the day following brushing. It is assumed that regular brushing of the tested materials did not influence their release of fluoride and that brushing of polyacid-modified composite resins does not lead to maintaining their initially high level of fluoride release. Received: 6 May 1999 / Accepted: 21 July 1999     

Fluoride release from restorative materials and a luting cement

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: In addition to conventional glass ionomers, a considerable number of different types of materials have been formulated to release fluoride. Variation in composition results in quantitative differences in the amount of fluoride release by these materials. PURPOSE: This study evaluated and compared fluoride release in distilled water from different types of restorative materials and a luting cement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fluoride release from 4 glass ionomer formulation restorative materials (Miracle-Mix, Fuji ionomer type III, Fuji II LC improved, and Ketac-Silver), a luting cement (Ketac Cem), a compomer (Compoglass Flow), 2 sealants (Fissurit F, Helioseal F), and a composite resin (Tetric) was evaluated at time intervals of 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours and 2, 3, 7, 14, 28, 56, and 112 days. Seven disks of each material were made and stored for equilibration in double distilled water at 37 degrees C for the time of each measurement. The equilibrated solution was analyzed for fluoride with a TISAB and an ion-specific combination electrode (ORION 960900) connected to an expandable ion analyzer (Crison micropH 2002). Data were analyzed by means of univariate analysis of variance, the Dunnett C post hoc test, and repeated measures analysis. RESULTS: Fluoride was released from all the evaluated materials, with considerable variation in the rate of release but a similar pattern. Among the materials tested, fluoride release from glass ionomer formulations was greater than that from composite resin formulations; the rank of decreasing order was as follows: Miracle Mix > Fuji III, Ketac Cem > Fuji II LC > Ketac Silver, Compoglass F > Fissurit F, Helioseal F > Tetric (> indicates statistical significance; P< .05). CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study, glass ionomer formulations and the compomer released more fluoride than the sealants and the composite resin tested.