Use of a single bolus of GnRH agonist triptorelin to trigger ovulation after GnRH antagonist ganirelix treatment in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction, with special reference to the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: preliminary report: short communication

A new treatment option for patients undergoing ovarian stimulation is the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol, with the possibility to trigger a mid-cycle LH surge using a single bolus of GnRH agonist, reducing the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high responders and the chance of cycle cancellation. This report describes the use of 0.2 mg triptorelin (Decapeptyl) to trigger ovulation in eight patients who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH, Puregon) and concomitant treatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran) for the prevention of premature LH surges. All patients were considered to have an increased risk for developing OHSS (at least 20 follicles > or =11 mm and/or serum oestradiol at least 3000 pg/ml). On the day of triggering the LH surge, the mean number of follicles > or =11 mm was 25.1 +/- 4.5 and the median serum oestradiol concentration was 3675 (range 2980-7670) pg/ml. After GnRH agonist injection, endogenous serum LH and FSH surges were observed with median peak values of 219 and 19 IU/l respectively, measured 4 h after injection. The mean number of oocytes obtained was 23.4 +/- 15.4, of which 83% were mature (metaphase II). None of the patients developed any signs or symptoms of OHSS. So far, four clinical pregnancies have been achieved from the embryos obtained during these cycles, including the first birth following this approach. It is concluded that GnRH agonist effectively triggers an endogenous LH surge for final oocyte maturation after ganirelix treatment in stimulated cycles. Our preliminary results suggest that this regimen may prove effective in triggering ovulation and could be said to prevent OHSS in high responders. The efficacy and safety of such new treatment regimen needs to be established in comparative randomized studies.     

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after superovulation using GnRH agonists for IVF and related procedures.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the most serious iatrogenic complication of ovarian stimulation. In severe cases, haemoconcentration, hypovolaemia, thromboembolism and death may result. It is reassuring that its incidence is not increased after ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization despite very high serum oestradiol levels and large numbers of follicles and oocytes. This may be related to follicular aspiration, expert monitoring or low implantation rates. However, complete prevention has not been achieved despite the wide availability of ultrasound and oestradiol assays, thus presenting the clinician with a continuous challenge. Our aim is to analyse critically the most recent published series of OHSS in in-vitro fertilization and other assisted reproduction techniques using stimulation with gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG). The main determining factor in the development of OHSS appears to be ovarian predisposition. Patients with polycystic ovarian disease are at a high risk of OHSS and therefore a small dose and slow start of HMG is recommended, tailoring the dosage according to the ovarian response. Accurate prediction by ultrasound and oestradiol assays and strict prevention by withholding human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) or cryopreservation of all the embryos have a major impact on the occurrence of OHSS. It is interesting that fixed-schedule IVF cycles, without detailed monitoring, are not associated with an increased incidence of OHSS. The use of GnRHa, despite expectations, is associated with a higher prevalence of OHSS. Luteal phase supplementation with progesterone rather than HCG should be used in cycles where oestradiol is greater than 2500 ng/l or where the number of oocytes exceeded 10.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproduction

The available literature concerning the association betweengonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist and ovarian hyperstimulationsyndrome has been reviewed and the different patterns by whichthis agent may contribute to the development of such iatrogeniccomplication has been elicited, and guidelines have been presentedfor prevention of this malady. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormoneagonist acts directly on human granulosa cells, probably inits own dose-dependent manner. The extent of this action isprobably subjected to follicular maturation stage and to thedegree of gonadotrophin pre-treatment. Various agonist effectsin assisted reproduction may be implicated in the developmentof ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a higher amount of menotrophin;premature luteinization prevention; ‘flare-up’ effect;and a higher pregnancy rate. Different methods for preventionof ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome may be attempted: (i) allembryo cryopreservation with luteal phase reinitiation of agonist;(ii) avoidance of ovulatory human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG)and continuation of agonist; (iii) cancellation of ovulatoryHCG, prolongation of agonist and later recommencement of menotrophin;(iv) pre-ovulatory LH surge triggering by agonist instead ofthe conventional HCG. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonistmay affect the steroidogenic ovarian stroma directly and suchinteraction may aggravate the development of ovarian hyperstimulationsyndrome.     

A prospective, randomized comparison of two starting doses of recombinant FSH in combination with cetrorelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI

BACKGROUND: A prospective randomized study was carried out in two centres to compare the number of oocytes retrieved after two different starting doses of recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) (Gonal-F) in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles using the multiple dose regimen of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cetrorelix (Cetrotide) to prevent induction of the premature LH surge. METHODS: Sixty women were randomized to receive rhFSH 150 IU ('low'), and 60 women to receive rhFSH 225 IU ('high') as the starting dose for the first 5 days of stimulation. From stimulation day 6 and onwards, including the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration, the women received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix as a daily dose. The primary endpoint was the number of oocytes retrieved. RESULTS: The mean number (+/- SD) of oocytes was 9.1 +/- 4.4 and 11.0 +/- 4.6 in the 'low' and 'high' groups respectively (P = 0.024). The mean number of 75 IU ampoules of rhFSH was significantly lower in the 'low' group (23.0 +/- 6.3 versus 30.5 +/- 5.6, P < 0.0001). The ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle and per embryo transfer were 25.9 and 28.8% versus 25.4 and 26.8% respectively in the 'low' and 'high' rhFSH groups (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: When using a starting dose of 225 IU rhFSH combined with the multiple dose of 0.25 mg cetrorelix from stimulation day 6, significantly more oocytes were obtained than with a starting dose of 150 IU rhFSH.     

Effect of GnRH antagonists in FSH mildly stimulated intrauterine insemination cycles: a multicentre randomized trial

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of GnRH antagonists in mild controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles is debated. METHODS: Two-hundred and ninety-nine couples with unexplained or mild male factor infertility were enrolled in this international multicentre randomized controlled trial. Women allocated to the GnRH antagonist group (n=148) received 50 IU recombinant FSH starting on day 3 of the menstrual cycle and Ganirelix 0.25 mg daily starting from the day in which a follicle with a mean diameter of 13-14 mm was visualized at ultrasound. Women allocated to the control group (n=151) were administered only 50 IU recombinant FSH starting on day 3 of the menstrual cycle. Couples were recruited only for their first treatment cycle. The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate per initiated cycle. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the two treatment groups were similar. Clinical pregnancy rates per initiated cycle in women who did and did not receive GnRH antagonists were 12.2 and 12.6%, respectively (P=1.00). The relative risk of conception (95% confidence interval) for the use of GnRH antagonists was 1.0 (0.5-1.9). CONCLUSIONS: In mild COH and IUI cycles, any benefit of the use of GnRH antagonists in improving pregnancy rates is <2-fold increase.     

Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproductive technology: definition of high risk groups.

In a retrospective analysis of 637 cycles of ovarian stimulation and transvaginal follicular aspiration for various assisted reproductive technologies, severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (SOH) occurred in six (0.94%) cycles. The patients at a high risk of developing SOH in cycles of assisted reproduction were those who had excessive serum oestradiol levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration (oestradiol greater than 6000 pg/ml; 38% SOH) and a high number of oocytes obtained (greater than 30 oocytes; 23% SOH). In those patients with both oestradiol greater than 6000 pg/ml on the day of HCG administration and greater than 30 eggs retrieved, the chance of developing SOH was 80%. The higher the serum oestradiol levels and the more eggs retrieved, the higher the pregnancy rates observed. High oestradiol level did not appear to have a detrimental effect on pregnancy rates and outcome. Furthermore, our results are not consistent with suggestions that the addition of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist to ovarian stimulation protocols, follicular aspiration and/or luteal support with progesterone may reduce the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.     

GnRH antagonists followed by a decline in serum estradiol results in adverse outcomes in donor oocyte cycles

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess clinical outcomes using GnRH antagonists in oocyte donation cycles. METHODS: Between July 2000 and June 2001, 40 recipient cycles generated from donor oocytes were evaluated. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) was started on cycle day 2 using recombinant gonadotrophins (225 IU daily). GnRH antagonist was started on cycle day 6 of COH. All recipients were synchronized to donors using GnRH agonist followed by estrogen and progesterone supplementation. Main outcome measures were days of stimulation (DOS), number of ampoules used, peak serum estradiol, number of oocytes, fertilization rate, embryo score, clinical on-going pregnancy rate and implantation rate. RESULTS: Thirty-seven donor cycles (93%) underwent oocyte retrieval, resulting in 36 embryo transfers. Fourteen cycles (35%) had decreased serum estradiol after initiation of GnRH antagonist. No differences were seen in numbers of FSH ampoules, DOS, peak serum estradiol, number of retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate and embryo quality. However, clinical pregnancy rate per initiated cycle [14% (2/14) versus 54% (14/26)], ongoing pregnancy rate per initiated cycle [7% (1/14) versus 46% (12/26)] and implantation rate (4 versus 24%) were all significantly less (P <0.05) following a decrease in serum estradiol after initiation of GnRH antagonist. No clinical predictor, including donor age, basal day 2 FSH or estradiol, ovarian morphology or serum estradiol prior to GnRH antagonist, was predictive of a decline in serum estradiol following GnRH antagonist. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate an adverse effect on clinical outcome in cycles, resulting in a decline in serum estradiol after GnRH antagonist administration. This effect was unpredictable and provided a simplified protocol for oocyte donation cycles; nonetheless, further study is needed to clarify the adverse effects of GnRH antagonists in oocyte donation cycles.     

Treatment with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone is effective, safe and convenient: results of a controlled, randomized, multicentre trial. The European Orgalutran Study Group

A multicentre, open-label, randomized study of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran((R))/Antagon((TM))) was performed in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH: Puregon((R))). The study was designed as a non-inferiority study using a long protocol of buserelin (intranasal) and rFSH as a reference treatment. A total of 730 subjects was randomized in a treatment ratio of 2:1 (ganirelix:buserelin) using an interactive voice response system which stratified for age, type of infertility and planned fertilization procedure [IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)]. The median duration of GnRH analogue treatment was 5 days in the ganirelix group and 26 days in the buserelin group, whereas the median total rFSH dose was 1500 IU and 1800 IU respectively. In addition, in the ganirelix group the mean duration of stimulation was 1 day shorter. During ganirelix treatment the incidence of LH rises (LH >/=10 IU/l) was 2.8% versus 1.3% during rFSH stimulation in the buserelin group. On the day of triggering ovulation by human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), the mean number of follicles >/=11 mm diameter was 10.7 and 11.8, and the median serum oestradiol concentrations were 1190 pg/ml and 1700 pg/ml in the ganirelix and buserelin groups respectively. The mean number of oocytes per retrieval was 9.1 and 10.4 respectively, whereas the mean number of good quality embryos was 3.3 and 3.5 respectively. The fertilization rate was equal in both groups (62.1%), and the same mean number of embryos (2.2) was replaced. The mean implantation rates were 15.7% and 21.8%, and the ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt were 20.3% and 25.7% in the ganirelix and buserelin groups respectively. Evaluation of all safety data indicated that the ganirelix regimen was safe and well tolerated. The overall incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was 2.4% in the ganirelix group and 5.9% in the reference group. The results of this study support a safe, short and convenient treatment regimen of ganirelix, resulting in a good clinical outcome for patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF or ICSI.     

Induction of pre-ovulatory luteinizing hormone surge by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist for women at risk for developing the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a major risk inpatients undergoing ovulation induction protocols. Withholdinginjection of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) may preventthe development of OHSS, but can also result in failure to ovulateand conceive. We have used a gonadotrophin-releasing hormoneagonist (GnRHa) as an alternative to HCG in women not undergoingin-vitro fertilization in an attempt to prevent OHSS. The studyincluded 12 cycles in 12 women scheduled for ovulation inductionwith human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) who were at risk ofdeveloping OHSS (oestradiol>3500 pg/ml, number of follicles>20).GnRHa was injected to induce the pre-ovulatory, luteinizinghormone surge which triggers follicular maturation. Progesteronewas administered for luteal support. Six pregnancies were achieved,and none of the 12 women developed OHSS. Since the pregnancyrate in this study was acceptable, we can recommend the useof GnRHa instead of HCG in any case at risk of developing OHSS     

Metabolic characteristics of women who developed ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate whether a higher incidence of hyperinsulinism is found in women who have suffered from ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) as compared with other IVF patients. Additionally, we also assessed whether any abnormalities in the haemostatic system were more frequent in women with a past history of OHSS. METHODS: A pilot study was carried out involving OHSS patients and matched IVF patients. Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) of insulin sensitivity was calculated. The main outcome measures were: insulin sensitivity, coagulation anomalies, factor V Leiden mutations, methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphism and prothrombin gene mutation, protein C and protein S deficiency. RESULTS: No increased incidence in hyperinsulism nor in abnormalities of the haemostatic system were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study does not provide evidence for an increased prevalence of hyperinsulinism among women who have developed OHSS in the past.     

GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in oocyte donation cycles: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: The specific role of LH in folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation is unclear. GnRH antagonists, when administered in the late follicular phase, induce a sharp decrease in serum LH which may be detrimental for IVF outcome. This study was performed to evaluate whether the replacement of GnRH agonist (triptorelin) by a GnRH antagonist (ganirelix; NV Organon) in oocyte donation cycles has any impact on pregnancy and implantation rates. METHODS: A total of 148 donor IVF cycles was randomly assigned to use either a GnRH antagonist daily administered from the 8th day of stimulation (group I) or a GnRH agonist long protocol (group II) for the ovarian stimulation of their donors. The primary endpoints were the pregnancy and the implantation rates. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (39.72%, 29/73 versus 41.33%, 31/75) based on transvaginal scan findings at 7 weeks of gestation, the implantation rate (23.9 versus 25.4%) and the first trimester abortion rate (10.34 versus 12.90%) were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: In oocyte donation cycles the replacement of GnRH agonist by a GnRH antagonist appears to have no impact on the pregnancy and implantation rates when its administration starts on day 8 of stimulation.     

Comparable clinical outcome using the GnRH antagonist ganirelix or a long protocol of the GnRH agonist triptorelin for the prevention of premature LH surges in women undergoing ovarian stimulation

This multicentre, randomized study was performed to assess theefficacy and safety of 0.25 mg ganirelix (Orgalutran^®, Antagon^TM)treatment, using triptorelin (Decapeptyl^®) in a long protocolas a reference treatment. In total, 236 subjects were randomizedto treatment with ganirelix (0.25 mg, s.c.) and 119 to triptorelin(0.1 mg, s.c.) treatment (treatment ratio 2:1). Treatment withganirelix started on day 6 of stimulation, whereas treatmentwith triptorelin started on menstrual cycle day 21 to 24 ofthe previous cycle (i.e. the midluteal phase). The ganirelixregimen was on average 17 days shorter (9 versus 26 days) comparedto the triptorelin regimen. The median total dose of recombinantFSH (Puregon^®) used was 450 IU less (1350 versus 1800 IU)in the ganirelix protocol. The initial follicular growth wasfaster and, consequently, oestradiol concentrations were higherin the ganirelix group. On the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG), the mean number of follicles 11 mm was 10.1 and 10.7and the median serum oestradiol concentration was 1090 and 1370pg/ml in the ganirelix and triptorelin groups respectively.Per attempt, 7.9 and 9.6 oocytes (mean) were retrieved in theganirelix and triptorelin groups respectively. The fertilizationrates (64.0% ganirelix and 64.9% triptorelin) and the mean numberof good quality embryos (2.7 and 2.9) were comparable in bothtreatment groups. The implantation rate was identical (22.9%).The ongoing pregnancy rate per attempt was 31.0 and 33.9% inthe ganirelix and triptorelin groups respectively. The ganirelixregimen showed an improved local tolerance in that the percentageof subjects with at least one local skin reaction was 2-foldlower than in the triptorelin group (11.9 versus 24.1%). Takingall data together, it may be concluded that ganirelix offersa new treatment regimen in ovarian stimulation that is short,safe and well-tolerated, optimizing convenience for the patient.     

Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following salvage of empty follicle syndrome.

We report a case of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) following a rescue of empty follicle syndrome (EFS). This suggests that the risk of developing OHSS remains unaltered even in the presence of EFS. The case supports the possibility of obtaining oocytes that fertilize and cleave normally after a second dose of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and a repeat oocyte retrieval. It supports the suggestion that the follicles are not necessarily empty in EFS. It demonstrates further that OHSS cannot be prevented by aspiration of follicular fluid and patients with large numbers of follicles and EFS must be warned of this potential complication.     

GnRH antagonists and mild ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination: a randomized study comparing different gonadotrophin dosages

BACKGROUND: The precise role of GnRH antagonists in the armamentarium of drugs for stimulation of ovulation associated with intrauterine insemination remains to be clarified. In this study, we have compared two different protocols employing GnRH antagonists in order to determine the lower effective dose of gonadotrophins to use. METHODS: Sixty-six couples with unexplained infertility or moderate male subfertility were recruited. Starting on day 3 of the cycle, 32 patients were randomized to receive 50 IU of recombinant FSH per day, whereas 34 were treated with 50 IU of recombinant FSH on alternate days. Women received the GnRH antagonist Ganirelix at a dose of 0.25 mg per day starting on the day in which a leading follicle > or =14 mm in mean diameter was visualized, until HCG administration. Insemination was performed 34 h after HCG injection. RESULTS: The regimen with daily recombinant FSH was associated with a lower rate of mono-ovulation (53.3% versus 78.8%, P=0.06) but also with a higher clinical pregnancy rate per initiated cycle (34.4% versus 5.9%, P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A protocol of recombinant FSH 50 IU daily and GnRH antagonist may represent an effective and safe regimen for ovulation induction associated with intrauterine insemination.     

Increased early pregnancy loss in IVF patients with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Since severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a potentially life-threatening complication of assisted reproduction, the focus of attention in such cases is placed firmly upon the health of the patient, with the endeavour to achieve a pregnancy being considered of secondary importance. The aim of this study was to focus on the pregnancy rate and pregnancy outcome in IVF patients hospitalized for severe or critical OHSS, in one centre, during a period of 6 years. METHODS: We compared the characteristics of patients with severe OHSS: those who conceived with the ones who did not conceive, and among pregnant IVF patients, those with ongoing pregnancies with those that miscarried. RESULTS: Pregnancy was achieved in 60 of 104 (58%) patients with severe OHSS. Pregnancy continued until delivery in 37 of these 60 patients (62%), whereas the remaining 23 (38%) aborted. The pregnancy and abortion rates in patients with severe OHSS were significantly higher than those of IVF patients without OHSS, during the same time period [23% (1138/4922) and 15% (169/1138) respectively, P < 0.001]. The mean duration of hospitalization for OHSS was significantly shorter in those who delivered compared with those who aborted (5.9 +/- 3.2 versus 10.5 +/- 9.6 days, P < 0.01) and in the non-pregnant patients compared with the pregnant patients (5.2 +/- 3.2 versus 7.6 +/- 6.6 days, P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical pregnancy rate of IVF patients with severe OHSS was significantly higher than that of patients without the syndrome. A longer stay in hospital-reflecting a more severe form of OHSS-was correlated with a higher frequency of abortions. OHSS, necessitating hospitalization, is a detrimental clinical situation not only for the mother but also for the developing pregnancy.     

Aorto-subclavian thromboembolism: a rare complication associated with moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

The case of an arterial aorto-subclavian thromboembolism associatedwith a moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) andfollowing ovulation induction for in-vitro fertilization ina young woman is reported. Because of the lack of response tosystemic thrombolysis, a left postero-lateral thoracotomy wasperformed on day 8 after embryo transfer. A fibrinocruoric embolussituated at the junction of the left subclavian artery fromthe aorta was removed through a left subclavian arteriotomy.The distal axillary embolus was removed by a retrograde ballooncatheter embolectomy. A moderate OHSS was observed. The ovarianstimulation and OHSS-related risks of thromboembolism are discussed.We conclude that, in the absence of risk factors, counsellingabout possible complications resulting from stimulation mustbe emphasized.     

Hormonal profiles and follicular growth in cycles with imminent ovarian hyperstimulation

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is a common and serious complication of human menopausal gonadotrophin/human chorionic gonadotrophin treatment. We evaluated the changes in the pituitary and ovarian hormone profiles and ultrasonographic follicular regression in 12 patients in whom human menopausal gonadotrophin was discontinued due to 'imminent' ovarian hyperstimulation. Following discontinuation, three distinct periods were observed: (i) days 1-2, the levels of oestradiol, testosterone and prolactin, and the total number of follicles continued to rise; (ii) days 3-6, the levels of oestradiol, testosterone and prolactin declined sharply and the total number of follicles was reduced significantly, while the large and medium sized follicles continued to increase. Levels of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone gradually declined to reach their lowest levels by days 5-6 and then increased. (iii) Thereafter the number of follicles and steroid output declined to early follicular phase levels. We conclude that discontinuation of human menopausal gonadotrophin and withholding human chorionic gonadotrophin in cycles with laboratory signs of 'imminent' ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, allows regression of the ovarian ultrasonographic finding and prevents the development of clinical symptoms. However, if rescue of the cycle is attempted, human chorionic gonadotrophin should be given during the first 4 days after discontinuation of stimulation.     

CLINICAL REPORT: The use of intravenous albumin in patients at high risk for severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

Previous experiences in subjects with other forms of third spacefluid accumulation have shown that albumin is efficacious inpreventing and correcting haemodynamic instability. Using asimilar approach in an effort to increase the serum oncoticpressure and to reverse the leakage of fluids from the intravascularspace, high risk subjects for severe ovarian hyperstimulationsyndrome (SOHS) were treated with albumin. In a recent largestudy two high risk factors were identified, i.e. the numberof oocytes and levels of serum oestradiol. Thirty-six womenundergoing assisted reproductive techniques who presented boththese factors, received intravenous albumin at a dose of 5%in Ringers lactate in doses of 500 ml during oocyte retrievaland 500 ml immediately thereafter in the recovery room. Dailymeasurements of urine output, serum and urine electrolytes,weight, abdominal girth, and haematocrit prior to and afteroocyte retrieval revealed normal serum and urine electrolytelevels, and no signs of haemoconcentration. No patient in thisstudy developed SOHS, and of course none had to be hospitalized.Vaginal ultrasound performed in the majority of the subjectsrevealed 100 ml of peritoneal fluid 48–72 h after oocyteretrieval. The only complication from the use of intravenousalbumin was the appearance of a ‘flu-like condition’(low grade temperature, nausea and muscle pains) developed by12 women between days 3 and 5 after oocyte collection. Intravenousalbumin had thus prevented the development of severe ovarianhyperstimulation syndrome in an assisted reproduction programme.Its use could allow the maintenance of treatment in patientsthat otherwise would have been cancelled due to their high riskof developing this condition. The proposed mechanisms of actioninclude increase in plasma oncotic pressure, and in the sexsteroid binding capacity of the plasma. Both factors could preventleakage of fluid from the intravascular space into the peritonealcavity.     

Comparison between a GnRH antagonist and a GnRH agonist flare-up protocol in oocyte donors: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Little information is available on the outcome of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) using GnRH antagonist in oocyte donation cycles especially in comparison with the short GnRH agonist protocol. This study was aimed at comparing the two stimulation protocols in oocyte donation (OD) cycles. METHODS: A total of 113 donors randomly received COH using either GnRH antagonist or GnRH agonist. The primary endpoint was the mean number of mature oocytes retrieved per started donor cycle. Secondary endpoints were the mean number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes (COCs) retrieved, the mean proportion of mature oocytes, pregnancy and implantation rates in recipients. RESULTS: Oocytes were distributed to 166 recipients. The mean number (+/- SD) of COC (11.6 +/- 5.8 versus 12.1 +/- 6.7), mature oocytes (8.4 +/- 4.4 versus 8.9 +/- 5.3) and the proportion of mature oocytes (70.8 versus 75.7%) retrieved per started donor cycle were similar in the antagonist and agonist groups, respectively. The implantation rate (26.1 versus 30.1%), clinical (40.2 versus 45.6%) and ongoing pregnancy rate per recipient cycle (32.2 versus 37.9%) were comparable in antagonist and agonist protocols, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Similar mean number of mature oocytes and comparable pregnancy rates are achieved after OD in which donors received COH using GnRH antagonist or short GnRH agonist protocols.     

A new approach to the management of patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation in an in-vitro fertilization programme.

In this study, we report an alternative method of management of patients at a potential risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in an in-vitro fertilization (IVF) programme, by the use of gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa). Thirty eight women considered at risk of this syndrome, having serum oestradiol greater than 4000 pg/ml following ovarian stimulation, received a GnRHa nasal spray for induction of the preovulatory endogenous luteinizing hormone surge for follicular maturation prior to oocyte recovery. Oocyte recovery (mean oocytes per cycle 18.60 +/- 4.79; range 15-35) and IVF were successfully completed in 27 cycles. Twenty six women had embryos replaced and 11 pregnancies occurred (28.9% per operation, 42.3% per replacement cycle). None of the patients developed OHSS. Where there is a risk of OHSS, the use of GnRHa to induce the preovulatory surge of endogenous luteinizing hormone for final follicular maturation provides a successful and more economical alternative to cancellation of cycles.