Sirolimus reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes despite lower cyclosporine doses in caucasian recipients of mismatched primary renal allografts: a phase II trial. Rapamune Study Group

BACKGROUND: The novel agent sirolimus (SRL; Rapamune; rapamycin) inhibits the immune response by a mechanism distinct from those of calcineurin antagonists or antimetabolites. This randomized, controlled, multicenter, single blind, phase II trial examined the combination of SRL, steroids, and full versus reduced doses of cyclosporine (CsA) for prophylaxis of acute renal allograft rejection. METHODS: A total of 149 recipients of mismatched cadaveric- or living-donor primary renal allografts were randomized into six groups. Three groups received placebo or 1 or 3 mg/m2/day SRL, as well as steroids and full-dose CsA (Sandimmune). Three groups received steroids, reduced-dose CsA (target trough level 50% of full-dose range), and 1, 3, or 5 mg/m2/day SRL. RESULTS: The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes within the first 6 months after transplant was reduced from 32.0% in the control group to 8.5% in patients receiving SRL (1 or 3 mg/m2/day) and full-dose Sandimmune CsA (P=0.018). Similar low rates of acute rejection episodes were observed among non-African-Americans, but not African-Americans, treated with SRL and reduced-dose Sandimmune CsA. Despite the augmented immunosuppression, 1-year patient and graft survival rates did not differ significantly across groups. Adverse effects attributable to CsA, including hypertension and new-onset diabetes mellitus, were not exacerbated by SRL. Except for an increased incidence of pneumonia among patients receiving full-dose CsA and 3 mg/m2/day SRL, the incidences of opportunistic infections were similar in all treatment groups. Although SRL produced more frequent, but reversible, hematological and lipid abnormalities, it had no apparent nephrotoxic effects to exacerbate CsA-induced renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: SRL in combination with CsA and steroids not only lowers the incidence of biopsy-proven acute renal allograft rejection episodes, but also may permit CsA sparing, at least among Caucasian patients, without an increased risk of rejection.     

Sirolimus-based therapy with or without cyclosporine: long-term follow-up in renal transplant patients

This open-label, phase 3b, extension trial in renal transplant recipients (Sirolimus Study 311) assessed the long-term safety of sirolimus (SRL) administered with cyclosporine (CsA) (SRL + CsA group, n = 98) or without CsA (SRL group, n = 69). Renal transplant recipients who had either completed one of seven previous SRL studies sponsored by Wyeth Research or had participated for > or =3 months and reached a protocol-designated endpoint were eligible for enrollment. Data were available for 167 patients, all of whom initially received steroids. Mean total SRL exposure was 1526 days, including previous study participation. After enrollment in the extension study, there were significantly more acute rejections in the SRL + CsA group (6.1% vs 0%, P < .05). Differences in rates of graft loss (3.1% vs 1.4%) and death (6.1% vs 1.4%) were not significantly different between SRL + CsA and SRL groups, respectively. At 48 months after transplantation, calculated GFR (53.4 vs 70.9 mL/min) and hemoglobin (124.9 vs 136.6 g/L) were significantly better in the SRL group. Lipid values were not significantly different between groups at 48 months. The incidence of treatment-emergent increased creatinine, anemia, hypertension, headache, epistaxis, abnormal kidney function, and upper respiratory infection were significantly higher in the SRL + CsA group, whereas no adverse events were significantly higher in the SRL group. Malignancies were reported more frequently (11.2% vs 0%) with SRL + CsA. Results from this extension study indicate that SRL-based therapy without CsA is a safe alternative to combination therapy with CsA, offering long-term improvement in renal function with no increased risk of late acute rejection.     

Impact of the variability of cyclosporin A trough levels on long-term renal allograft function.

BACKGROUND: Among renal allograft recipients, there is a considerable variability in cyclosporin A (CsA) trough levels. Some of the CsA metabolites are pharmacologically active. The variability of polyclonal CsA trough levels may contribute to the fact that long-term renal allograft survival is still not satisfactory. In a retrospective, single-centre study, we investigated the influence of the variability of polyclonal CsA trough levels on long-term renal allograft function. METHODS: Patients (n=381) received double immunosuppression consisting of CsA and methylprednisolone (MP). For each patient the CsA coefficient of variation (CCV) and the mean CsA trough level during the observation period (5 years) were calculated. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, patients were divided into two groups: group I, CCV <28.05%, n=231; group II, CCV >28.05%, n=150. Additionally, patients were divided into three groups according to their mean CsA trough level: group A, <270 ng/ml, n=50; group B, 270-370 ng/ml, n=282; group C: >370 ng/ml, n=49. RESULTS: Compared to group I, patients in group II experienced a higher incidence of acute rejection episodes (40.7% vs 29.4%, P=0.02), reduced 5-year graft survival (81.1% vs 93.3%, P=0.002), and higher serum creatinine levels (1.7+/-1.2 mg/dl vs 1.4+/-0.5 mg/dl, P=0.03). In patients with low mean CsA trough levels, the incidence of acute rejection episodes was elevated (group A vs B, 50.0% vs 30.9%, P=0.008) and 5-year graft survival was reduced (group A vs B, 79.8% vs 89.5%, P=0.005). Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed that the risk of graft failure within 5 years after transplantation was markedly elevated in group II (RR: 6.2, P=0.013) and in group A (RR: 8.9, P=0.008). Whereas the effect of CCV on 5-year graft survival was still evident in patients with normal or high mean CsA trough levels (>270 ng/ml, 81.9% vs 94.8%, P=0.0005), graft survival was independent from CCV in patients with low mean CsA trough levels (<270 ng/ml, 77.0% vs 81.7%, P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: Both, the intra-individual variability and the mean of polyclonal CsA trough levels influence long-term renal allograft survival. Targeting at sufficiently high mean CsA levels with a low intra-individual variability may help to further improve long-term renal allograft survival.     

12-month safety and efficacy of everolimus with reduced exposure cyclosporine in de novo renal transplant recipients

The proliferation signal inhibitor everolimus (Certican), has demonstrated efficacy with full-dose cyclosporine (CsA) (Neoral). Two multicenter randomized controlled studies were performed to compare 12-month efficacy and safety of everolimus 1.5 and 3.0 mg/day with reduced-dose CsA. Study 1 enrolled 237 de novo renal allograft recipients, randomizing 222 nonblack patients to either everolimus 1.5 or 3.0 mg/day, with the Neoral) dose guided by C(2) (monitoring of CsA concentration 2 h after dosing). Study 2 had a similar protocol, with basiliximab included, enrolling 256 recipients and randomizing 243 nonblack patients. In Study 1, there was a lower incidence of acute rejection in nonblack patients on 3 mg/day (16.4%) compared with 1.5 mg/day (25.9%), P = 0.08. In Study 2, the inclusion of basiliximab lowered the overall incidence of acute rejection; 14.3% of nonblack patients (3 mg/day) and 13.6% of nonblack patients (1.5 mg/day) had acute rejection by 12 months (P =0.891). Renal function was preserved throughout the study, with no differences observed between groups within studies. Everolimus was well tolerated with no significant differences between doses. Everolimus, in combination with reduced-dose Neoral), demonstrated efficacy and was well tolerated. Basiliximab allows for utilization of lower doses of everolimus with reduced dosing of Neoral).     

The role of the protocol biopsies in renal allograft recipients

Subclinical rejection and long-term cyclosporine nephrotoxicity are well-known risk factors of chronic allograft nephropathy. In a prospective study 32 low-risk patients were randomized to either a reduced CsA dose (5 mg/kg/d) and daclizumab (group A, n = 16) for 7 months posttransplant with subsequent CsA tapering/withdrawal, or to a normal CsA dose (10 mg/kg/day) without daclizumab (group B, n = 16). Both groups received MMF and prednisone. Protocol biopsies were obtained at engraftment and 3 and 12 months after Tx. The number of rejection episodes was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints were: renal function, histological parameters related to CsA, and serum levels of TGF-beta and PDGF-BB. A low incidence of clinically suspected rejection episodes was observed (19% in group A and 12.4% in group B; P = NS). Although protocol biopsies showed 12 subclinical rejection episodes (six in group A, six in group B), serum creatinine levels were not different between the examined groups at 3 months. However, at 12 months, there was a statistically improved mean creatinine level in group A patients (1.2 mg/dL +/- 0.5 in group A vs 1.54 mg/dL in group B; P <.05). Chronic histopathologic changes were significant for biopsies at 3 and 12 months in both groups compared to the baseline findings for protocol biopsies (with no differences between groups, or between 3 and 12 months in both groups). Serum TGF-beta and PDGF-BB did not differ between the groups. Protocol biopsies may be useful to monitor safety and efficiency of new immunosuppressive protocols. Immunosuppressive regimens with low CsA doses followed by the drug's complete withdrawal seem to be efficient and safe in low-risk kidney allograft recipients.     

西罗莫司在肾移植后近期应用中的疗效分析

目的探讨西罗莫司在肾移植后近期治疗中的应用效果。方法收集使用不同免疫抑制剂方案治疗的50例肾移植患者资料,应用环孢素A(CsA)+西罗莫司(SRL)+泼尼松(Pred)的18例患者为实验组,应用CsA+吗替麦考酚酯(MMF)+Pred的32例患者为对照组。对移植后6个月内的急性排斥反应、移植肾功能及血脂情况进行观察。结果实验组发生排斥反应2例,排斥反应发生率为11.1%;对照组为7例,发生率为21.8%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1个月实验组和对照组肾功能比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后1周及术后3、6个月2组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1、3、6个月实验组患者总胆固醇、甘油三酯及低密度脂蛋白水平均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后1周2组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论肾移植后近期采用CsA、SRL和Pred联合的免疫抑制治疗方案,可取得较好的免疫抑制效果。显著减少移植肾的急性排斥反应发生率,但高脂血症是SRL临床常见的不良反应。     

Amelioration of chronic renal allograft dysfunction in cyclosporine-treated patients by addition of azathioprine

Management of chronic renal allograft dysfunction in cyclosporine-prednisone treated renal allograft recipients remains problematic. We therefore initiated a protocol of azathioprine addition (1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day) to ongoing CsA/Pred therapy. Three groups were treated. Group A (n = 21) had chronic progressive renal dysfunction (serum creatinine greater than or equal to 2.5 mg/dl or more than 15% above baseline) four or more months after transplantation. Group B (n = 8) had frequent or severe rejection episodes occurring despite adequate CsA levels. Group C (n = 7) had constitutional side effects of CsA with or without renal dysfunction persisting despite drug taper or financial difficulty in affording CsA. Aza was initiated 17.8 +/- 2.8 months after transplantation in group A, the mean serum creatinine having risen from 2.55 +/- 27 mg/dl to 3.04 +/- .20 mg/dl (P = .07) over the six months preceding Aza initiation, despite stable and low therapeutic range HPLC whole-blood CsA levels (118 +/- 10 ng/ml vs. 133 +/- 11 ng/ml, P = NS). Renal function declined at a rate of -0.20 +/- .06 Cr1/year in the six-month period before addition of Aza, and then improved at a rate of 0.09 +/- .04 Cr-1/year after addition of Aza (P = .002). These changes in renal function occurred without a decrease in CsA levels (118 +/- 10 six months before Aza vs. 126 +/- 26 six months after Aza, P = NS). In group B Aza was initiated at 58 +/- 8 days after transplantation when mean sCr was 3.56 +/- .29 mg/dl and mean CsA level was 222 +/- 17 ng/ml. At least follow-up 12.7 +/- 2.0 months after addition of Aza, all group B grafts were functioning, mean sCr was 2.69 +/- .31 mg/dl (P = .09 compared with baseline), and mean CsA level was 128 +/- 34 ng/ml (P = .07 compared with baseline). Group C patients had addition of Aza at 43 +/- 19 months after transplantation when mean sCr was 2.97 +/- .60 and mean CsA level was 125 +/- 30 ng/ml; addition of Aza had no influence on the rate of decline in renal function in this group. Of these 36 patients, 6 received therapy for acute rejection over the entire follow-up period of 12.3 +/- 1.4 months after addition of Aza; 4 of these retain graft function. Infectious complications consisted of 2 urinary tract infections, 1 bacterial pneumonia, and one case of otitis media.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

肾移植患者术后早期应用霉酚酸酯的临床观察

目的 观察肾移植术后早期不同剂量霉酚酸酯（ＭＭＦ）与环孢素Ａ（ＣｓＡ）和泼尼松（Ｐｒｅｄ）联用预防急性排斥反应的效果及安全性。方法 将６４例肾移植患者分为３组,分别给予ＭＭＦ２．０ｇ／ｄ（Ａ组）、１．５ｇ／ｄ（Ｂ组）及Ａｚａ ５０～１００ｍｇ／ｄ（Ｃ组）,每组均联用ＣｓＡ及Ｐｒｅｄ（剂量相同）。观察肾移植术后６个月内急性排斥反应的发生率、移植肾功能及药物的副作用。结果 Ａ、Ｂ、Ｃ组急性排斥反应的发     

Long-term improvement in renal function with sirolimus after early cyclosporine withdrawal in renal transplant recipients: 2-year results of the Rapamune Maintenance Regimen Study

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate early cyclosporine (CsA) withdrawal from a sirolimus (SRL)-CsA-steroid (ST) regimen. METHODS: Within 48 hr after transplantation, 525 primary (90%) or secondary (10%) renal allograft recipients with cadaveric (89%) or living (11%) donors received 2 mg of SRL (troughs >5 ng/mL; immunoassay), CsA, and ST. Those eligible (430) were randomly assigned (1:1) at 3 months +/- 2 weeks to remain on triple-drug therapy (SRL-CsA-ST group) or to have CsA withdrawn and SRL trough concentrations targeted to 20 to 30 ng/mL (SRL-ST group) until month 12, and 15 to 25 ng/mL thereafter. RESULTS: At 24 months, there were no statistically significant differences in patient survival (94.0% vs. 95.3%), graft survival (91.2% vs. 93.5%), acute rejection after randomization (5.1% vs. 9.8%) or discontinuations (34% vs. 33%) for SRL-CsA-ST versus SRL-ST, respectively. Serum creatinine level was significantly better in patients who had CsA withdrawn (167 vs. 128 micromol/L, P<0.001), as was the slope of 1/creatinine. Similarly, systolic blood pressure was lower in patients who had CsA withdrawn (141 vs. 134 mm Hg, P<0.001). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol was significantly higher in the SRL-ST group, whereas total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were not significantly different. Hypertension, creatinine increase, abnormal kidney function, toxic nephropathy, edema, hyperuricemia, cataracts, Herpes zoster, and malignancy were reported significantly more often in patients continuing CsA. Thrombocytopenia, hypokalemia, abnormal liver function tests, abnormal wound healing, ileus, and pneumonia were reported significantly more frequently with SRL-ST. CONCLUSION: Data at 2 years confirm that early CsA withdrawal followed by an SRL-ST maintenance regimen results in long-term improvement in both renal function and blood pressure, without increased risk of graft loss or late acute rejection.     

Prospective comparison of the use of sirolimus and cyclosporine in recipients of a kidney from an expanded criteria donor

A 6-month, open-label, multicenter prospective pilot study was conducted to evaluate the effects of sirolimus (SRL) versus cyclosporine (CsA) in recipients of kidneys from expanded criteria donors. All patients also received antithymocyte globulins induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Sixty-nine patients (33 SRL, 36 CsA) were randomized. More patient were withdrawn in the SRL group (16 vs. 6, P<0.01), because of delayed graft function and surgical complications. Delayed graft function tended to be more frequent with SRL than with CsA (45.4% vs. 30.6%, P=0.22). Graft survival was numerically lower in the SRL group (87.5% vs. 97%, P=0.19). At 6 months, there were no significant differences in biopsy-proven acute rejection or calculated creatinine clearance (SRL 12.1% vs. CsA 8.3%; P=0.7 and 44.7+/-16.6 vs. 41.9+/-15.2 mL/min; P=0.54 respectively). These results do not support the use of SRL immediately after transplantation in expanded criteria donor recipients.     

Replacement of calcineurin-inhibitors with sirolimus as primary immunosuppression in stable cardiac transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after cardiac transplantation. The aim of this study was to assess over 2 years the safety and effect on renal function of withdrawal of CNI immunosuppression and replacement with sirolimus (SRL) in stable cardiac transplant recipients. METHODS: CNI was substituted with SRL in 78 cardiac transplant recipients (SRL group) of whom 58 (group A) had CNI-induced renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <50 mL/min) and 20 (group B) had preserved renal function (GFR >50 mL/min). Fifty-one patients (CNI group) with renal impairment (GFR < or =50 mL/min) maintained on CNI served as controls. Secondary immunosuppressants were unchanged. RESULTS: In the SRL group, GFR increased from 47.0+/-18.0 to 61.2+/-22.2 ml/min (P=0.0001) 24 months after SRL initiation. In Group A, GFR increased from 40.5+/-12.7 to 53.9+/-19.8 mL/min (P<0.0001). In Group B, GFR increased marginally from 67.2+/-15.8 to 83.5+/-27.8 mL/min (P=0.10). In the CNI group, GFR declined from 40.5+/-14.0 mL/min to 36.4+/-12.5 mL/min (P=0.23) after 24 months of follow up. There was no significant difference in cardiac rejection or cardiac allograft function. In SRL group, proteinuria increased from 299+/-622 mg/day to 517+/-795 mg/day (P=0.0002) 12 months after SRL initiation and then stabilized; it did not differ from CNI group at 24 months (637+/-806 vs. 514+/-744 mg/day, P=0.39). Uric acid decreased from 7.6+/-2.4 to 6.2+/-1.9 mg/dL (P=0.0007) in the SRL group. CONCLUSIONS: Graduated substitution of CNI with SRL in cardiac transplant recipients is safe and improves renal function, without cardiac compromise.     

Transplant renal artery stenosis: association with acute vascular rejection

BACKGROUND: Transplant renal artery stenosis, the prevalence of which varies from 2% to 12%, is an important cause of hypertension and allograft dysfunction. We sought to determine the clinical characteristics of this disorder, assessing, predisposing factors, establishing treatment options, and examining patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 321 renal allograft recipients between November 1996 and December 2004, six patients were identified with this finding. We analyzed their clinical data before and after treatment compared with the 315 recipients face of the disorder. RESULTS: The six patients with the disorder were diagnosed within the first year (2 to 8 months; median 5.5 months). All patients displayed renal dysfunction, peripheral edema, and new-onset or uncontrolled hypertension at presentation. Abnormal Doppler findings were observed in 5 (83.3%) patients. The hemodynamically significant stenosis was successfully treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in all six. However, 3 (50%) patients displayed recurrent stenosis requiring a second PTA. The mean serum creatinine level decreased from a pre-PTA value of 4.4 +/- 1.8 mg/dL to a 1-month post-PTA value of 2.2 +/- 0.5 mg/dL (P = .027). Patients had no significant improvement in mean systolic and diastolic pressure. Vascular acute rejection episodes were more frequent among the affected than the control group (3/6; 50% vs 18/315; 5.7%; P < .001). No differences were found in age, sex, donor type, etiology of renal disease, immunosuppression, acute tubular necrosis, acute cellular rejection, cold ischemia time, or HLA matching. CONCLUSION: Transplant renal artery stenosis is a common cause of hypertension and renal allograft dysfunction. Acute vascular rejection is associated with this disorder.     

A randomized trial of steroid avoidance in renal transplant patients treated with everolimus and cyclosporine

In this randomized trial renal transplant recipients were treated with basiliximab, everolimus 3 mg/day, low-dose CsA. At transplantation, patients were randomized to stop steroids at the seventh day (group A) or to continue oral steroids in low doses (group B). Of the 113 patients enrolled, 65 were randomized to group A and 68 to group B. All patients were followed for 2 years. During the study 28 (43%) group A patients required reintroduced corticosteroids. One patient died, in group B. The Graft survival rate was 97% in group A and 90% in group B. There were more biopsy-proven rejections in group A (32% vs 16%; P = .044). The mean creatinine clearance was 54 +/- 21 mL/min in group A vs 56 +/- 22 mL/min in group B. Mean levels of serum cholesterol tended to be lower in group A, but the difference was of borderline significance (191 +/- 91 vs 251 +/- 188 mg/dL; P = .07). Vascular thrombosis (0 vs 5) and pneumonia requiring hospitalization (2 vs 7) tended to be more frequent in group B. Only three cases of CMV infection (1 vs 2) occurred. An immunosuppressive therapy with everolimus and low-dose CsA allows one to obtain excellent renal graft survival and stable graft function at 2 years. Early interruption of steroids in patients treated with this regimen may increase the risk of acute rejection, but neither affects graft survival nor graft function, while possibly reducing the risk of hyperlipemia and vascular thrombosis. About 60% of patients given everolimus and low-dose CsA can definitively stop steroids after 1 week.     

Concentration-controlled use of sirolimus associated with reduced exposure of cyclosporine in black recipients of primarily living renal allograft donors: 12-month results

AIM: This study was designed to identify optimal therapeutic sirolimus (SRL) concentrations in black kidney transplant recipients on reduced cyclosporine (CsA) exposure and prednisone. METHODS: Seventy patients (64 living/six deceased) received CsA (8-10 mg/kg/d), prednisone, and 15 mg loading dose followed by 5-mg fixed doses of SRL till day 7 when they were randomized to maintain SRL trough concentrations (high-performance liquid chromatography) of 8-12 (GI = 34) or 15-20 (GII = 36) ng/mL. RESULTS: Mean CsA concentrations were 109 +/- 53 vs. 89 +/- 41 ng/mL and 75 +/- 54 vs. 60 +/- 35 ng/mL (ns) at 2 and 6 months. Accordingly, mean SRL trough concentrations were 12.4 +/- 6.1 vs. 20.0 +/- 9.5 ng/mL (p < 0.001) and 10.8 +/- 5.8 vs. 18.0 +/- 6.1 ng/mL (p < 0.001). The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection [13% (GI: 18% vs. GII: 8%, ns)], graft loss or death was 16% (GI: 21% vs. GII: 11%, ns]. There were no deaths and three graft losses (GI = 1; GII = 2). Creatinine clearance was higher in GI (64.5 +/- 17 vs. 54.4 +/- 14.7 mL/min, p = 0.011). The incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus was 13% and no CMV disease was observed. CONCLUSION: In black recipients of primarily living renal allograft donors reduced CsA exposure and SRL concentration-controlled regimens produced low incidences of acute rejection, post-transplant diabetes mellitus and CMV disease, with no significant impairment in graft function.     

Beneficial effect of concomitant induction with antilymphoblast globulin, cyclosporine, and steroids on long-term renal allograft outcome

BACKGROUND: The addition of induction therapy with antilymphocytic antibodies to cyclosporine (CsA) based immunosuppression, has reduced acute rejection incidence and improved short-term survivals, but has not had well-established effects on long-term renal transplant survival. PATIENTS: We analyzed the long-term allograft outcome of patients included in a prospective randomized clinical study conducted in our center 15 years ago by comparing two strategies: (A) horse antilymphoblast globulin (ALG) given at 10 mg/kg on alternate days to a maximum of 6 doses with low-dose CsA started at 8 mg/kg per day and prednisone at 0.25 mg/kg per day, versus (B) CsA started at 15 mg/kg per day and prednisone at 0.5 mg/kg per day. Diabetic and highly sensitized patients (PRA > 70%) were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The characteristics of the 50 patients enrolled in each group were not different. Although patient survival was not different (88% in group A vs 77% in group B), recipients treated with ALG showed a lower incidence of acute rejection episodes (20% vs 44%, P = .01) and better death-censored renal allograft survival (57% vs 41%, P = .03). Among rejection-free patients, graft survival was 15% higher in group A (60% vs 45%, P = .12). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that an acute rejection episode (relative risk [RR]: 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-4.39; P = .0029) rather than ALG immunosuppression (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.41-1.33; P = NS) was an independent predictor of death-censored graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we confirmed that concomitant induction therapy with ALG, CsA, and steroids improves long-term renal allograft survival.     

Incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus in kidney transplant recipients immunosuppressed with sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine

Sirolimus (SRL) in combination with Cyclosporine A (CsA) and steroids has been shown to lower the incidence of acute renal allograft rejection episodes, allowing CsA sparing. We retrospectively compared the incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) among kidney transplant recipients (KTx) immunosuppressed with SRL + CsA versus CsA alone. Patients were divided into two groups: SRL + CsA (n = 38) versus CsA (n = 48). Mean follow-up was 53.9 +/- 17.1 months. Seventeen/86 subjects (19.8%) developed diabetes after transplantation (7 IFG, 8.1%; 10 PTDM, 11.6%). The incidence was significantly higher in SRL + CsA (12/38 patients, 31.6%) compared with CsA (5/43 patients, 10.4%) (P = .0144, odds ratio 3.97). More patients required treatment in the SRL + CsA compared to CsA alone cohort (13.2% vs 2.1%, P = .051): 4 pts (10.5%) became insulin- dependent among SRL+CsA, vs none in the CsA group. Use of OHD was similar in both groups (2.6% SRL + CsA vs 2.1% CsA). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex distribution, BMI, or serum creatinine at 1 to 3 and 5 years from transplantation. All PTDM patients are alive at follow-up, while two grafts were lost due to chronic renal allograft dysfunction. Within the limits of a small retrospective study, we observed that SRL in combination with CsA increased the diabetogenic potential of CsA. A possible explanation of our findings is that higher CsA doses were used in the early experience with SRL + CsA; therefore the higher incidence of PTDM that we observed in the SRL + CsA combination may be a sign of toxicity. Careful monitoring of blood levels is mandatory in the SRL + CsA combination to avoid pleiotropic toxicity.     

Sirolimus allows early cyclosporine withdrawal in renal transplantation resulting in improved renal function and lower blood pressure

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated whether cyclosporine (CsA) could be eliminated from a sirolimus (Rapamune, rapamycin, SRL)-CsA-steroid (ST) regimen at 3 months. METHODS: This was an open-label study conducted in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Upon enrollment, 525 primary (90%) or secondary (10%) renal allograft recipients with cadaveric (89%) or living (11%) donors received 2 mg of sirolimus (troughs>5 ng/ml), CsA, and steroids. At 3 months+/-2 weeks, eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to remain on SRL-CsA-ST or to have CsA withdrawn and therapy continued with SRL (troughs 20-30 ng/ml)-ST. RESULTS: At 12 months, overall graft and patient survival were 89.1% and 94.9%, respectively. In the 430 (82%) randomized patients, there was no difference in graft survival (95.8% vs. 97.2%, SRL-CsA-ST vs. SRL-ST) or patient survival (97.2% vs. 98.1%, respectively). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed primary acute rejection was 13.1% during the prerandomization period. After randomization, the acute rejection rates were 4.2% and 9.8% for SRL-CsA-ST and SRL-ST, respectively (P=0.035). Renal function (calculated glomerular filtration rate, 57 vs. 63 ml/min, P<0.001) and blood pressure significantly improved when CsA was withdrawn. Hypertension, CsA nephrotoxicity, hyperuricemia, and Herpes zoster occurred statistically more frequently in patients remaining on CsA, whereas thrombocytopenia, abnormal liver function tests, and hypokalemia were reported more often for SRL-ST therapy. CONCLUSION: Sirolimus, CsA, and steroids for 3 months posttransplant, followed by elimination of CsA, is a safe and effective alternative to continuous therapy with sirolimus, CsA, and steroids that can result in better renal function and lower blood pressure.     

Aseptic hip necrosis after renal transplantation

To help determine the etiology of posttransplant aseptic hip necrosis, 11 stable renal allograft recipients (group A) who developed aseptic hip necrosis were compared with 89 patients (group B) without this complication. A comparison of mean age, duration of dialysis, mean daily prednisone dose, and incidence of rejection in the first year following transplant, sex, donor source, incidence of posttransplant parathyroidectomy, and mean serum calcium and alkaline phosphatase levels identified no significant differences between groups A and B. The mean serum creatinine value at three (2.2 +/- 0.31 mg/dL [190 +/- 30 mumol/L] vs 1.9 +/- 0.10 mg/dL [170 +/- 10 mumol/L]) and 12 (2.3 +/- 0.35 mg/dL [200 +/- 30 mumol/L] vs 1.9 +/- 0.10 mg/dL [170 +/- 10 mumol/L]) months and the serum phosphate value at three (3.0 +/- 0.19 mg/dL [0.97 +/- 0.06 mmol/L] vs 2.8 +/- 0.08 mg/dL [0.90 +/- 0.03 mmol/L]) and six (3.2 +/- 0.25 mg/dL [1.03 +/- 0.08 mmol/L] vs 2.9 +/- 0.25 mg/dL [0.94 +/- 0.08 mmol/L]) months were significantly greater in group A. Eight patients in group A underwent 13 total hip replacement an average of 16.5 +/- 3.1 months following transplant without significant complications. In conclusion, posttransplant aseptic hip necrosis occurs frequently, and renal allograft dysfunction may contribute significantly to its pathogenesis. When indicated, total hip replacement is both safe and effective.     

A calcineurin antagonist-free induction strategy for immunosuppression in cadaveric kidney transplant recipients at risk for delayed graft function

BACKGROUND: Avoidance of calcineurin antagonists for a prolonged period de novo after cadaver donor renal transplantation may facilitate recovery from delayed graft function. The present study examined the benefit of prolonging the calcineurin antagonist-free interval by administering sirolimus (SRL) in combination with chimeric (c-) anti-interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) monoclonal antibodies (mAb). METHODS: Three contemporaneous but nonrandomized cohorts were compared for acute rejection episodes, patient and graft survival rates, renal function, and adverse reaction profiles for 12 months. Patients with delayed graft function were treated with either SRL/c-IL-2R mAb/prednisone (Pred) with inception of cyclosporine (CsA) once the serum creatinine value was < or =2.5 mg/dl (n=43; group 1) or anti-lymphocyte preparations/Pred/delayed CsA for 7 to 14 days (n=18; group 3). A third cohort displayed immediate function and was treated de novo with CsA/c-IL-2R mAb/Pred (n=21; group 2). RESULTS: The incidence of acute rejection episodes was significantly lower among group 1 (16%) compared with groups 2 (52%, P=0.004) or 3 (39%, P=0.05). Among the seven rejection episodes in group 1, six of seven occurred among African-American or retransplant recipients, and a separate cluster of six of seven occurred among patients who displayed SRL trough concentrations < or =9 ng/ml. Furthermore, additional antilymphocyte antibody treatment was required to reverse either steroid-resistant or Banff grades II or III acute rejection episodes among 14%, 55% (P=0.08), and 71% (P=0.03) of patients in each group, respectively. Patient and graft survival rates, as well as mean serum creatinine values, were similar at 12 months among the three groups. However, group 1 patients displayed higher serum cholesterol and triglyceride values, as well as lower hemoglobin, platelet, and leukocyte values compared with the other two groups. CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that a SRL/c-IL-2R mAb/Pred induction regimen provides excellent acute rejection prophylaxis.     

Cardiovascular risk profile in nondiabetic renal transplant patients: cyclosporine versus tacrolimus

Calcineurin inhibitors (CIs) contribute to cardiovascular risk (CR) in renal transplant (RT) patients. However, the CR profile in RT patients without preexistent diabetes is not well known. We compared CR factors in 191 nondiabetic RT recipients with functioning grafts beyond 1 year, receivingly either CsA (Neoral; n=100) or tacrolimus (Tac; n= 91). Clinical data and pretransplant CR profiles were similar in both groups. There were no differences in acute rejection episodes and graft survival rates during follow-up. The overall proportions of posttransplant diabetes (9% versus 6%), and of hypertension (73% vs 63%) were similar in both groups. Hyperlipidemia was more frequent in the CsA group (58% vs 31%; P=.0001). The cholesterol levels in the CsA group showed at 3 months (232+/-47 vs 202+/-42 m/dL; P=.0001), 6 months (232+/-49 vs 205+/-41 mg/dL; P=.0001), and 12 months (217+/-50 vs 202+/-40 mg/dL; P=.028), despite receiving a greater proportion of lipid-lowering drugs (49% vs 15%; P=.0001). Logistic regression analysis showed that CsA was an independent predictor of posttransplant hyperlipidemia (OR: 5.8, CI 95%; 3.3-10.7; P=.0001) as were age, female gender, pretransplant dyslipidemia, and body mass index (BMI). Interestingly, an interaction was observed between pretransplant BMI and CIs: Among pretransplant normal weight patients (BMI <25 kg/m2), CsA produced a greater incidence of hyperlipidemia than tacrolimus (58% vs 23%; P=.0001) while not among patients who were overweight (BMI >25 kg/m2: pretransplant 58% vs 42%; P=.341). In conclusion, CsA confers a higher risk of hyperlipidemia after RT in nondiabetic patients, particularly those with normal pretransplant weight.