Experience with an organ procurement organization-based non-directed living kidney donation programme

The organ procurement organization (OPO)-based non-directed living kidney donation programme was developed to decrease wait times for kidney transplants, and to meet the community's desire for altruistic living donation. Community awareness was encouraged through information about non-directed living kidney donation on the state donor registry Web site, and through the media. The OPO received all inquiries and responded with phone calls, e-mails, printed information, medical/social history questionnaires, interviews, and referrals to the transplant centres. Kidneys were allocated according to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) wait list for the evaluating transplant centre. Between March 2002 and 23 September 2005, there were 608 inquiries to the OPO about non-directed living kidney donation. In 41 months, 20 transplants occurred with kidneys from non-directed donors. The donor registry and OPO-sponsored publicity led to 578 of the 608 inquiries and 15 of the 20 transplants. OPO screening saved transplant centre resources by ruling out 523 inquiries, referring 76 to transplant centres for complete evaluations. Optional donor/recipient meetings appeared to be beneficial to those participating. OPO-based non-directed living donor programmes can be effective and efficient. Standardization of evaluation, allocation, and follow-up will allow for better data collection and more widespread implementation.     

Could minors be living kidney donors? A systematic review of guidelines,position papers and reports

The purpose of this study is to systematically review guidelines, position papers, and reports on living kidney donation by minors. We systematically searched the databases such as Medline, Embase, ISI Web of knowledge, Google scholar as well as the websites of various bioethics committees, transplant organizations and societies. Guidelines were included if they provided recommendations for or against living kidney donation by minors. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. We included 39 documents in this study. Twenty seven of these endorse an absolute prohibition of living kidney donation by minors, because of concerns regarding the decision‐making capacity of minors, the impartiality of parental authorization, the best interests of the minor, and the necessity of the donation. Twelve guidelines, however, would exceptionally allow living kidney donation by minors, provided that adequate safeguards are put in place, including an assessment of the minor's autonomy and maturity, authorization by an independent body, assuring that the anticipated psychosocial benefits outweigh the medical and psychosocial risks for the donor and the restriction to situations of last resort. A more adequate medical and psychosocial follow‐up of living kidney donors may likely contribute to a more unified approach towards living kidney donation by minors.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring after renal transplantation in children

Hypertension occurs commonly following renal transplantation and may cause end organ damage, such as cardiac hypertrophy. This study seeks to determine which features of hypertension are related to cardiac hypertrophy in children after renal transplantation. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed in 45 pediatric patients, 4.9+/-3.0 years after renal transplantation. ABPM data were related to clinical features and echocardiographic measurements. Hypertension was demonstrated in 33% of patients by casual blood pressure (BP) measurement and in 40% by ABPM. The mean percentage nighttime decline in BP (dipping) was 8.9+/-5.0% for systolic and 13.9+/-7.7% for diastolic BP. Abnormal dipping (<10%) was seen in 58% of patients. BP load (percentage of BP recordings above 95th percentile) was >30% in 44% of patients. Patients taking antihypertensive medication had more abnormal dipping and greater nighttime BP load. The prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy was 72% before transplantation, 75% after transplantation, and 54% near to ABPM. Left ventricular mass (LVM) indexed to height(3) decreased significantly after transplantation. (40.2+/-14.7 vs. 35.0+/-8.3 g/m(3), P=0.0002). There was no significant relationship between ABPM data and LVM. ABPM was not able to differentiate those patients with persistently elevated LVM. The results suggest that hypertension is not always associated with cardiac hypertrophy following pediatric renal transplantation.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children after renal transplantation

Arterial hypertension is a common complication in children after renal transplantation and the control of hypertension is often difficult. This retrospective investigates the prevalence and rate of control of hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in 45 children (mean age 14.1 +/- 4.3 years, mean time after renal transplantation 2.2 +/- 2.7 years), all on cyclosporine or tacrolimus, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil plus daily steroids. The overall prevalence of hypertension was 82%. None of the transplanted children had normal blood pressure without antihypertensive therapy (ie, spontaneous normotension). Twenty percent of children had untreated hypertension, 18% had controlled hypertension, and 62% had uncontrolled hypertension. Prevalence of the nondipping phenomenon was 53%. The mean number of antihypertensive drugs (without diuretic monotherapy) in treated patients was 1.9 drugs per patient. The prevalence of arterial hypertension in children after renal transplantation is high and the control of hypertension is often unsatisfactorily low.     

Long‐term risk for kidney donors with hypertension at donation – a retrospective cohort study

In the general population, small increases in blood pressure are associated with increased mortality. In kidney donors this association is less certain. We therefore assessed long‐term overall and cardiovascular mortality in donors who were hypertensive at the time of donation compared with normotensive donors. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure >140/90 mmHg or use of antihypertensive drugs. Adequate records available in 2131 donors revealed that 140 were hypertensive and 1991 were normotensive. Multivariable regression analyses were performed for overall and cardiovascular mortality. Hypertensive donors were significantly older (mean 57.7 vs. 46.9 years), more were males (44.3% vs. 41.5%), had higher body mass index (26.4 vs. 24.7) and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (91.8 vs. 101.2 ml/min/1.73 m²). After a median observation time of 20.8 years (interquartile range 11) 71 hypertensive donors had died and 26 of the deaths were cardiovascular. Multivariable analysis did not suggest a generalizable association between hypertension and long‐term overall mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9–1.5, P = 0.34] or cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.7–1.8, P = 0.55). These data may support the use of older healthy kidney donors with hypertension at donation.     

The use and value of procalcitonin in solid organ transplantation

Procalcitonin (PCT) has been increasingly used as a biomarker of bacterial infection and as a tool to guide antimicrobial therapy, especially in lower respiratory tract and bloodstream infections. Despite its increased use, data in patients with solid organ transplants are limited. Even without the presence of infection, PCT increases as a result of surgical procedures during transplantation, implantation of devices, and use of induction immunosuppressive therapy. The risk of infection is also higher in solid organ transplant recipients when compared to the general population. Monitoring PCT in the early post‐transplant period seems to be a promising method for early detection of infectious complications. It has been shown that elevated PCT levels after one wk of transplantation are correlated with infectious complications. PCT may be a useful adjunctive biomarker that may improve early identification and guide appropriate treatment of infection or rejection, with the potential to further improve clinical outcomes. The use of serial PCT measurements may be more reliable than single values. It is important to recognize which factors may lead to PCT increases in the post‐transplantation period, which in turn will help understand the kinetics and utility of this biomarker in this important patient population.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and renal functions in children with a solitary kidney

The aim of this study is to investigate the blood pressure (BP) profile, microalbuminuria, renal functions, and relations with remaining normal kidney size in children with unilateral functioning solitary kidney (UFSK). Sixty-six children with UFSK were equally divided into three groups: unilateral renal agenesis (URA), unilateral atrophic kidney (UAK), and unilateral nephrectomy (UNP). Twenty-two age-, weight-, and height-matched healthy children were considered as a control group. The serum creatinine level and first-morning urine microalbumin and creatinine concentrations were determined by the standard methods. Also, the BP profile was determined by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). We found that the serum creatinine level was higher and creatinine clearance was lower in each patient groups compared to those of the control group (p < 0.05). Compared with the controls, each group of patients had mean office, 24-h, daytime, and night-time systolic and diastolic BP values similar to those of the controls (p > 0.05). An inverse correlation was found between the renal size standard deviation scores (SDS) of normal kidneys and 24-h systolic and diastolic BP load SDS in all of the patients (p < 0.05; r = −0.372, r = −0.295, respectively). The observed relationship between renal size SDS and 24-h mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic and diastolic BP load SDS suggests that children with UFSK should be evaluated by using ABPM for the risk of hypertension.     

Comparison of organ donation and transplantation rates between opt-out and opt-in systems

1. Download : Download high-res image (334KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in healthy schoolchildren

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed in 564 healthy schoolchildren during normal circadian activities. The data of two cohorts (155 boys and 139 girls aged 9–13 years and 184 boys and 168 girls with a body height between 120 and 155 cm) are presented. From the age of 9 to 13 years the mean 24-h systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) increases from 107±9/ 66 ± 7 mmHg to 115 ± 13/68 ± 9 mmHg in boys and from 104 ± 5/64 ± 6 mmHg to 109 ± 8/65 ± 9 mmHg in girls. When related to body height the values rise from 105 ± 6/ 64 ± 6 mmHg at 120 cm to 113 ± 8/67 ± 7 mmHg at 155 cm in boys and from 100±7/65±7 mmHg to 112±9/ 66 ± 9 mmHg in girls. In comparison with the casual blood pressure data obtained from European studies, the presented ABPM values (daytime BP) are higher throughout, which may be explained by the increased activity during daytime with ABPM. There is a mean difference of 4.4 mmHg in boys and of 3.0 mmHg in girls for SBP and of 10.8 mmHg in boys and of 9.0 mmHg in girls for DBP when related to age. In relation to body height, there is a mean difference of 4.4 mmHg in boys and of 3.5 mmHg in girls for SBP and of 10.9 mmHg in boys and of 10.5 mmHg in girls for DBP. We conclude that standards derived from casual blood pressure measurements should not be used for the evaluation of ABPM data.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a versatile tool for evaluating and managing hypertension in children

In recent years, pediatric practitioners have increasingly used ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring for evaluating blood pressure (BP) abnormalities in children. ABP monitoring in adults is superior to casual BP measurements for predicting cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and whereas the association with target-organ damage in children is not as definitive, early evidence does seem to parallel the adult data. In addition to confirming hypertension at diagnosis, ABP monitoring may be useful for identifying isolated nocturnal hypertension, characterizing BP patterns, and assessing response to therapeutic interventions. This article reviews current evidence supporting the use of ABP monitoring in children and discusses limitations in our understanding of this technology, specifically focusing on indications for its use and interpretation of the large quantity of data obtained by ABP monitoring.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: mean blood pressure and blood pressure load

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is commonly used to diagnose pediatric hypertension. Using ABPM, hypertension is usually defined as a mean BP greater than the 95th percentile for height. A BP load >30% (% of BP readings greater than the 95th percentile) is also used for the diagnosis of hypertension. The objective of this study was to determine the agreement between mean BP greater than the 95th percentile and 30% BP load for the diagnosis of hypertension using ABPM. All ABPM records (n =1,009) of patients referred for hypertension to a pediatric center were retrieved. Scans were excluded if: age was >19 and height <115 cm or >185 cm. Mean BP and BP loads were calculated for 728 scans. Agreement between mean BP greater than the 95th percentile for height and various BP loads were calculated using the kappa coefficient. The kappa coefficient of agreement between mean BP greater than the 95th percentile and 30% BP load was 0.56 and 0.57 for daytime systolic and diastolic BP, respectively. The agreement between mean night-time BP greater than the 95th percentile and 30% BP load was 0.70 and 0.66 for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively. Agreement between mean BP greater than the 95th percentile and 30% BP load is only moderate to good. Maximum agreement between mean BP greater than the 95th percentile and BP load is achieved at 50% BP load.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients receiving long, slow home haemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Good blood pressure (BP) control has been reported previously in haemodialysis (HD) patients receiving 8-h dialysis sessions. Home HD allows patients to dialyze for long periods, but there are few data on the BP control achieved by these patients. We studied BP control, using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), in our home-HD patients who were receiving long-hours dialysis. METHODS: Twenty-four patients aged 52.7+/-11 years underwent ABPM. They had been on home HD for 52.9+/-39 months and dialysed for 7.2+/-1.1 h thrice weekly. Two patients were taking antihypertensive drugs. Historical data on BP and weight gains were obtained from the patients' own records. Left ventricular (LV) mass was assessed by echocardiography and total body water (TBW) by bioelectrical impedance. RESULTS: The mean 24-h BP was 129+/-17 mmHg (systolic) and 83+/-14 mmHg (diastolic). The daytime BP was 131+/-17 mmHg (systolic) and 84+/-14 mmHg (diastolic), while the night-time BP was 126+/-22 mmHg (systolic) and 81+/-17 mmHg (diastolic). Six patients (25%) had a normal circadian BP rhythm, but the rest showed a subnormal fall or an increase in BP at night. Mean 24-h BP did not correlate significantly with time on dialysis, dialysis session length, Kt/V, haemoglobin, interdialytic weight gain, or TBW. Twenty-one patients (87%) had LV hypertrophy and 16 of these had diastolic dysfunction. LV mass index was inversely correlated with nocturnal BP fall (r=-0.54, P=0.03). Non-dippers had been treated longer than dippers (29 vs 59.2 months, P=0.03) but they were similar in respect to age, dialysis session length or Hb concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Long, slow haemodialysis at home provides satisfactory daytime BP control in the majority of patients without the need for antihypertensive drugs but abnormal circadian BP rhythm and LV hypertrophy remain common.     

Kidney transplantation from related and unrelated living donors in a single German centre.

BACKGROUND: Organ transplantation began in 1954 with living related donation (LRD). Because of organ shortage from cadavers, unrelated kidney donation (LURD) has been proposed and shown to have good results despite complete HLA mismatching. This study aims to look at differences and similarities comparing LRD and LURD performed in our centre since the implementation of the German transplant law in 1997. METHODS: Between January 1997 and July 2001, 62 out of 112 potential living donors and their recipients were accepted. Immunosuppression consisted of triple therapy (steroids, cyclosporin, mycophenolate) in patients with three or fewer mismatches, or quadruple therapy including mono- or polyclonal antibody treatment in patients with four or more mismatches or cytotoxic antibodies. LRD and LURD groups were compared for number and type of rejections, complications and kidney function at the end of observation (median 15.5 months, range 1-50 months). RESULTS: Out of 112 pairs presenting, transplantation was performed in only 62 cases (55.4%). Reasons to deny transplantation were medical problems of the potential donors in 19, psychological problems in 13, recipient problems in seven and other reasons in 11 pairs. In 38 cases LRD transplantation and in 24 cases LURD transplantation was carried out. Recipient age was significantly lower in the LRD group (37.7+/-12.1 years) compared with the LURD group (53.6+/-7.8 years). Mean donor age was 49.7+/-9.2 years in the LRD group and 50.3+/-9.1 years in the LURD group (ns). The number of mismatches was lower in LRD (2.1+/-1) than in LURD (4.4+/-0.9) (P=0.001) transplantation. The acute rejection rate was similar in both groups (52.2 vs 54.2%). OKT3 and tacrolimus rescue therapy for more severe rejections was more often applied in the LRD group but the difference did not reach the level of significance. There were more infectious complications in LURD transplantation (66.7 vs 36.4%, P=0.036) and a trend towards more surgical complications in LRD transplantation (28.9 vs 8.3%, P=0.062). One graft was lost due to transplant artery thrombosis and one recipient died 4 months after transplantation subsequent to cerebral ischaemia. Both patients belonged to the LRD group. Creatinine values at the end of observation time were 1.76+/-0.6 mg/dl in the LRD group and 1.62+/-0.5 mg/dl in the LURD group (ns). CONCLUSION: Although kidney transplantation from unrelated donors was performed with a lower HLA match and although the recipients were older, the results are equivalent to living related transplantation. Therefore, kidney transplantation from emotionally related living donors represents a valuable option for patients with end-stage renal disease. Careful selection of donors and recipients is a prerequisite of success.     

Kidney transplant recipients after nonrenal solid organ transplantation show low alloreactivity but an increased risk of infection

The number of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) after nonrenal solid organ transplantation (SOT) has increased to almost 5%. Knowledge on patient and allograft outcomes, infections, and alloreactivity, however, remains scarce. We studied 40 KTRs after nonrenal SOT. Seven hundred and twenty primary KTRs and 119 repeat KTRs were used for comparison. Samples were collected pretransplantation, at +1, +2, and +3 months post‐transplantation. Alloreactive and CMV‐specific T cells were measured by interferon‐γ ELISPOT assay. Patient survival in KTRs after SOT, primary and repeat KTRs was comparable. While death‐censored allograft survival was comparable between KTRs after SOT and primary KTRs, KTRs after SOT showed superior 5‐year death‐censored allograft survival of 92.5% compared to 81.2% in repeat KTRs. Interestingly, KTRs after SOT show less preformed panel‐reactive antibodies, frequencies of alloreactive T cells, and acute rejections compared to repeat KTRs. KTRs after SOT, however, show higher incidences of EBV viremia and PTLD, sepsis, and death from sepsis. Impaired CMV‐specific cellular immunity was associated with more CMV replication compared to repeat KTRs. Our results suggest comparable patient and allograft outcomes in KTRs after SOT and primary KTRs. The observed low alloreactivity may contribute to excellent allograft outcomes. Caution should be taken in KTRs after SOT regarding infectious complications due to overimmunosuppression.     

Living donor kidney paired donation transplantation: experience as a founding member center of the National Kidney Registry

Kidney paired donation (KPD) is a safe and effective means of transplantation for transplant candidates with willing but incompatible donors. We report our single-center experience with KPD through participation in the National Kidney Registry. Patient demographics, transplant rates, and clinical outcomes including delayed graft function (DGF), rejection, and survival were analyzed. We also review strategies employed by our center to maximize living donor transplantation through KPD. We entered 44 incompatible donor/recipient pairs into KPD from 9/2007 to 1/2011, enabling 50 transplants. Incompatibility was attributable to blood type (54.4%) and donor-specific sensitization (43.2%). Thirty-six candidates (81.8%) were transplanted after 157 d (median), enabling pre-emptive transplantation in eight patients. Fourteen candidates on the deceased donor waiting list also received transplants. More than 50% of kidneys were received from other transplant centers. DGF occurred in 6%; one-yr rejection rate was 9.1%. One-yr patient and graft survival was 98.0% and 94.8%. KPD involving participation of multiple transplant centers can provide opportunities for transplantation, with potential to expand the donor pool, minimize waiting times, and enable pre-emptive transplantation. Our experience demonstrates promising short-term outcomes; however, longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact of KPD on the shortage of organs available for transplantation.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive CAPD patients

The periodic structure of 24-hour blood pressure variation(circadian rhythm of blood pressure by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring(ABPM) in hypertensive CAPD patients was investigated by a new method of analysis based upon the maximum entropy method(MEM). In addition, this method allows the adequacy of antihypertensive therapies to be evaluated in such patients. The results were as follows; 1) The frequency of non-dipper type hypertension was 88%(36/41 cases), and the remaining 12% (5/41) were dipper type hypertension patients. The rise in morning blood pressure(morning surge: MS) was noted in 64% of the former. 2) Night time systolic blood pressure(182 +/- 22 mmHg, n = 36) was higher in patients with non-dipper type hypertension than in those with the dipper type(151 +/- 17 mmHg, n = 5, p < 0.01). 3) The standardized level of systolic blood pressure(SLSBP) calculated by MEM analysis in patients with non-dipper type hypertension(177 +/- 7 mmHg) was comparable with that in those with dipper type hypertension(168 +/- 13 mmHg, ns). 4) Treatment with long-acting Ca antagonist alone significantly reduced both SLSBP and the area over the SLSBP from 188 +/- 18 mmHg to 160 +/- 7 mmHg(p < 0.01, n = 8), and area over the SLSBP from 2,735 +/- 340 mmHg.hr to 1,945 +/- 298 mmHg.hr(p < 0.01, n = 8). 5) In addition to long-acting Ca antagonist, administration of alpha 1-blocker given at bed time was significantly efficacious in reducing the rise in morning blood pressure, MS. The present study using MEM analysis of ABPM suggests that the blood pressure profile of hypertensive CAPD patients is characterized by a non-dipper type dominance and a frequent morning surge. Furthermore, the combined therapy with long-acting Ca antagonist and alpha 1-blocker was substantially effective both in reducing the overall blood pressure level, and in inhibiting the MS. This combined antihypertensive therapy may be potentially useful to prevent CAPD patients from the future development of cardiovascular complications.     

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation from organ donation after cardiac death

Background: The concept of organ donation after cardiac death (DCD) historically precedes the current practice of organ procurement from heartbeating donors meeting the brainstem death criteria. DCD has not gained widespread interest, however, due partly to initial fears that transplantation of such organs leads to suboptimal outcome. Methods: Available data on long‐term outcomes following simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant (SPK) from DCD donors were reviewed, and it was found that the long‐term outcome is comparable to SPK from heartbeating donors. Australia’s first SPK from a DCD donor was performed. Results: The patient received a kidney and a pancreas from a young healthy donor after cardiac death, and at the time of writing was well with functioning grafts. Conclusion: SPK from donation after cardiac death is safe and should continue to be available for patients in need.     

Gender disparity of living donor renal transplantation in East China

Gender disparity among living kidney donors is common world wide, which demonstrates different social and economic problems in different countries. However, few data are available for China. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed all 139 living donor renal transplants performed in our center between 2003 and 2010. The annual number of living donor renal transplants increased from six to 26 cases per year during the observation period. Among them, 69.2% of all kidney donors were females, whereas 79.5% of the recipients were male. The average age of recipients was 34.1 ± 7.6 yr and 94% (110/117) were younger than 44 yr. In contrast, 53% (62/117) of all donors were “middle‐aged” (45–59 yr) with an average donor age of 47.8 ± 9.2 yr. The first‐degree relatives accounted for the majority of the donor pool, as the most common donor‐recipient combination consisted of mother to son. In conclusion, there was a male and young preponderance among recipients, and a female and middle‐aged one among donors of living kidney transplants in our transplant center, which might be related to socio‐cultural as well as economic factors.     

Generic tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation

The availability of a wide range of immunosuppressive therapies has revolutionized the management of patients who have undergone solid organ transplantation (SOT). However, the cost of immunosuppressive drugs remains high. This situation has led to the development of generic equivalents, which are similar in quality, safety, and efficacy to their approved innovator drugs. There are data available for three generic brands, tacrolimus (Intas), tacrolimus (PharOS), and tacrolimus (Sandoz). Bioequivalence has been demonstrated for generic tacrolimus (Sandoz) within a narrow therapeutic range to its innovator tacrolimus drug (Prograf) in both healthy volunteers and kidney transplant patients. Clinical experience with this generic tacrolimus formulation has also been established in both de novo and conversion patients who have undergone kidney and liver transplantation, as well as in conversion of other SOT patients, including lung and heart recipients.