Regional anesthesia for ambulatory surgery

Ambulatory surgery is increasing at unprecedented rates with more complex procedures being performed. This article reviews the benefits of the use of regional anesthesia during ambulatory surgeries. Regional anesthesia, by putting the anesthetic at the surgical site, provides ideal conditions for ambulatory surgery and provides a smooth, predictable post-operative course.     

Propofol anesthesia for ambulatory surgery in adults

We reported 131 cases of ambulatory surgery in adults mainly anaesthetized with propofol infusion. Without any premedication, anesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl. A laryngeal mask airway was inserted using intravenous injection of vecuronium. Anesthesia was maintained with continuous infusion of propofol and intermittent fentanyl administrations, and local anesthetic infiltration was combined. All patients received air and oxygen mixture (FIO2 0.4) throughout the procedure. During surgery, metoclopramide and flurbiprofen axetil were given to prevent postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting. After surgery, patients were observed at the daycare unit in ward. Average age was 42 years and ASA risk was 1.3. Operation time and anesthesia time and hospital stay were 43.4 minutes, 70.6 minutes and 332 minutes, respectively. In 25 patients (19%) analgesics were needed for postoperative pain. Although 3 patients (2.3%) were unsuccessful as ambulatory surgery due to excessive pain, all patients including these three could be discharged within 24 hours after surgery. We conclude that combined anesthesia with propofol, fentanyl and local anesthetic is suitable for ambulatory surgery in adults.     

Regional anesthesia in ambulatory surgery

Regional anesthesia is an attractive alternative for many ambulatory cases due to excellent postoperative pain relief and potential of speeding up the process from the OR to discharge. Regional anesthesia may be practised successfully in a busy ambulatory unit with a dedicated and simple regimen.     

Loco-regional anesthesia in ambulatory surgery]

Following a brief review of the various types of local anesthesia, including a recent method using EMLA cream, the paper focuses on the different complications which arise in relation to the technique used. Treatment protocols are also analysed in relation to the toxic stage.     

Update in regional anesthesia for shoulder surgery

Recent advances in the application of regional anesthesia to the care of patients undergoing shoulder surgery are discussed. New techniques for the management of postoperative pain are highlighted, with an emphasis on interscalene patient-controlled analgesia and suprascapular block. New developments in the safety and effectiveness of brachial plexus block are presented. The technique of interscalene block used at our institution is discussed in detail. Intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia caused by activation of the Bezold-Jarisch reflex is considered. The ongoing debate regarding the use of paresthesia versus nerve-stimulator techniques is examined.     

Early but no long-term benefit of regional compared with general anesthesia for ambulatory hand surgery

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether either regional anesthesia (RA) or general anesthesia (GA) provided the best analgesia with the fewest adverse effects up to 2 weeks after ambulatory hand surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing ambulatory hand surgery were randomly assigned to RA (axillary brachial plexus block; n = 50) or GA (n = 50). Before surgery, all patients rated their hand pain (visual analog scale) and pain-related disability (Pain-Disability Index). After surgery, eligibility for bypassing the postanesthesia care unit ("fast track") was determined, and pain, adverse effects, and home-readiness scores were measured. On postoperative days 1, 7, and 14, patients documented their pain, opioid consumption, adverse effects, Pain-Disability Index, and satisfaction. RESULTS: More RA patients were fast-track eligible (P < 0.001), whereas duration of stay in the postanesthesia care unit was shorter in the RA group (P < 0.001). Time to first analgesic request was longer in the RA group (P < 0.001), and opioid consumption was reduced before discharge (P < 0.001). In the RA group, the pain ratings measured at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after surgery were lower (P < 0.001), and patients spent less time in the hospital after surgery (P < 0.001). More GA patients experienced nausea/vomiting during recovery in the hospital (P < 0.05). However, on postoperative days 1, 7, and 14, there were no differences in pain, opioid consumption, adverse effects, Pain-Disability Index, or satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant reduction in pain before discharge from the hospital after ambulatory hand surgery, single-shot axillary brachial plexus block does not reduce pain at home on postoperative day 1 or up to 14 days after surgery when compared with GA. However, RA does provide other significant early benefits, including reduction in nausea and faster discharge from the hospital.     

Balanced regional anesthesia for hand surgery

In summary, the clinical goal in regional anesthesia for hand surgery is to constantly approach the ideal of a well-conducted, smooth, "balanced regional technique." This begins with the preoperative interview, assurance, and preoperative sedation (po). In the operating room, monitoring (EKG, BP) and safety measures (IV port, nasal oxygen) precede the regional technique. The block is performed with asepsis, minimal "needling," and correct dosages. The complement to neural blockade anxiolytic medication is titrated, thus the balance of IV sedation and regional block is achieved. The patient's symptoms, vital signs, and general comfort should be attended to during the hand surgery. Monitoring is continued in the recovery room, where special attention is given to positioning, cushioning of pressure areas, dressing, analgesia, and specific physical rehabilitation exercises. With a "balanced regional technique," the patient becomes an early participant in his or her own postoperative care and result. This balanced technique reduces the patient's overall operative risk and maximizes the surgical result.     

Interscalene regional anesthesia for shoulder surgery

BACKGROUND: Despite a trend toward the use of regional anesthesia for orthopaedic procedures, there has been resistance to the use of interscalene regional block for shoulder surgery because of concerns about failed blocks and potential complications. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 568 consecutive patients who had shoulder surgery under interscalene regional block in a tertiary-care, university-based practice with an anesthesiology residency program. The blocks were performed by a group of anesthesiologists who were dedicated to the concept of regional anesthesia in their practice. Complete anesthetic and orthopaedic records were available for 547 patients. The surgical procedure, planned type of anesthesia, occurrence of block failure, and the presence of complications were noted. RESULTS: Of the 547 patients, 295 underwent an arthroscopic procedure and 252 (including eighty who had an arthroplasty) underwent an open procedure. General anesthesia was the initial planned choice for sixty-nine patients because of the complexity or duration of the procedure, the anatomic location, or patient insistence. Thirty-four of the sixty-nine patients also received an interscalene regional block. Interscalene regional block alone was planned for 478 patients. A total of 462 patients (97%) had a successful block whereas sixteen required general anesthesia because the block was inadequate. The success of the block was independent of the type or length of the surgery. No patient had a seizure, pneumothorax, cardiac event, or other major complication. Twelve (2.3%) of the 512 patients who had a block had minor complications, which included sensory neuropathy in eleven patients and a complex regional pain syndrome that resolved at three months in one patient. For ten of the eleven patients, the neuropathy had resolved by six months. CONCLUSIONS: Interscalene regional block provides effective anesthesia for most types of shoulder surgery, including arthroplasty and fracture fixation. When administered by an anesthesiologist committed to and skilled in the technique, the block has an excellent rate of success and is associated with a relatively low complication rate.