The role of D2-like dopamine receptors in the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine in mice

RATIONALE: Previous studies indicate antagonism of cocaine-stimulated locomotor activity by dopamine D2-like receptor antagonists, but only at doses of the antagonists, that by themselves attenuate locomotor activity, raising questions of the specificity of the interaction and whether it might be due solely to a summation of opposing effects. OBJECTIVES: The interactions of cocaine and several D2-like dopamine antagonists and non-dopamine "physiological antagonists" were compared across a full range of doses in order to fully characterize the interaction and assess the specificity of the effects of dopamine antagonists and cocaine. METHODS: Swiss-Webster mice were treated with either vehicle, a D2-like antagonist (haloperidol, spiperone, raclopride, spiperone, (+) or (-) eticlopride), or a "physiological" antagonist (chlordiazepoxide, clonidine, or R(-) N6-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine) and cocaine (5-80 mg/kg) prior to a 30-min locomotor activity test. RESULTS: All test drugs decreased locomotor activity when given alone. All test drugs attenuated cocaine-induced locomotion and decreased peak responding to cocaine. In general, the D2-like antagonists also decreased maximal responding to cocaine and decreased the slope of the ascending limb of the cocaine dose-effect curve, effects not obtained with physiological antagonists. CONCLUSIONS: Blockade of D2-like receptors resulted in an interaction with cocaine that was fundamentally different from that produced through non-dopaminergic mechanisms and appears to be more than a summation of opposing effects. The present data suggest that D2-like receptors are involved in the mechanisms underlying the induction of locomotor activity by cocaine.     

Selective antagonism of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors does not block the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine

The objective of this study was to determine whether the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine could be prevented by either D₁ or D₂ selective dopamine receptor antagonists. Male Wistar rats were treated daily for 7 days with either cocaine (15 mg/kg, IP) or vehicle in combination with the D₁ dopamine antagonist SCH 23390 (0.3 mg/kg, SC), the D₂ dopamine antagonist sulpiride (100 mg/kg, IP), or vehicle. After the daily injections, the rats were tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas. Twenty-four hours after the last pre-exposure test session, all rats were given a challenge injection of cocaine (15 mg/kg, IP) and tested for activity. Cocaine treatments produced a greater relative increase in locomotor activity with repeated exposure (i.e. sensitization). Moreover, this increase in cocaine-induced locomotor activity was attenuated by both SCH 23390 and sulpiride. In contrast, neither sulpiride nor SCH 23390 blocked the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine. That is, rats pretreated with sulpiride or SCH 23390 and cocaine did not differ from rats pre-exposed only to cocaine when given a cocaine challenge injection. These results suggest that behavioral sensitization to cocaine may develop through either D₁ or D₂ dopamine receptor stimulation or possibly through stimulation of some non-dopaminergic receptor.Portions of this paper were presented at the 1992 Society for Neuroscience meetings, Anaheim, Cal., USA     

Combined effects of psychostimulants and morphine on locomotor activity in mice

Simultaneous administration of psychostimulants and opioids is a major drug abuse problem worldwide. This combination appears to produce synergistic effects on behavior at low doses; however, there is little direct evidence that the combination is stronger than either drug alone. Therefore, we investigated interactions between psychostimulants and morphine on locomotor activity in mice. Low doses of cocaine (5.0 mg/kg) or methamphetamine (0.5 mg/kg) and morphine (10 mg/kg) enhance locomotor activity in a synergistic fashion. Effective doses of cocaine (20 mg/kg) and morphine (20 mg/kg) increased locomotion in an additive fashion. In contrast, combination of methamphetamine (1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg) and morphine (10 and 20 mg/kg) did not merely enhance their effects (or attenuated the peak effects of methamphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion). These results indicate that different mechanisms explain the interaction between morphine and methamphetamine or cocaine. It is well known that psychostimulants- and opioids-induced hyperlocomotion is mediated by the activation of the dopaminergic system, however, haloperidol (a dopamine receptor antagonist) and U50,488H (which attenuates dopamine release from nerve terminals) significantly increased the effects of methamphetamine and morphine on the locomotor activity. These results suggest that excess dopaminergic activation may be involved in the effects of methamphetamine and morphine on locomotor activity in mice.     

Effects of a D1 and a D2 dopamine antagonist on the self-administration of cocaine and piribedil by rhesus monkeys

Rhesus monkeys were surgically prepared with chronic intravenous catheters and allowed to self-administer the indirect dopamine (DA) agonist cocaine (0.03 or 0.1 mg/kg/inj) or the direct D2 agonist piribedil (0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg/inj) on a fixed-ratio 10 schedule of drug delivery during daily 2 hour experimental sessions. When responding was stable, they were injected IV with SCH 23390, a selective D1 antagonist (0.003-0.3 mg/kg, 30 min pre-session) or pimozide, a selective D2 antagonist (0.003-0.3 mg/kg, 2 hours pre-session). Intermediate doses of pimozide generally increased self-administration of cocaine or piribedil, though increases in piribedil self-administration were more reliable. In contrast, intermediate doses of SCH 23390 either did not affect or decreased cocaine and piribedil self-administration. High doses of each antagonist decreased the rate of self-administration of each compound and produced catalepsy. The selective increase in responding maintained by cocaine or piribedil following pimozide pretreatment suggests a role for a D2-like receptor in psychomotor stimulant self-administration.     

Nafadotride administration increases D1 and D1/D2 dopamine receptor mediated behaviors

The administration of nafadotride, given at doses known to block the D3 dopamine receptors (0.75, 1.5, 3 mg/kg i.p.) increased locomotor activity both in naive and habituated rats and counteracted the hypothermia but not the hypomotility induced by a low dose of the putative D3 dopamine agonist (+/-)-7-hydroxy-2-(di-N-propylamino)-tetralin (7-OH-DPAT; 0.04 mg/kg). Nafadotride did not antagonize either the motor effects induced by different doses of the D2 agonist quinpirole (0.05 and 0.3 mg/kg) or the hypermotility induced by 7-OH-DPAT given at a dose (0.32 mg/kg) stimulating D2 dopamine receptors. The same nafadotride doses potentiated the grooming behavior induced by the D1 dopamine agonist SKF 38393 (10 mg/kg i.p.) as well as the stereotyped response to the D1/D2 agonist apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg s.c.). Stereotyped behavior was also observed in rats concomitantly treated with nafadotride and the D2 agonist quinpirole. As the activation of D1 dopamine receptors plays an important role in the occurrence of stereotypies, the results suggest that the blockade of D3 receptors by nafadotride could have favored D1/D2 dopamine receptor-mediated behaviors by potentiating D1 receptor function.     

Cocaine-induced locomotor activity and cocaine discrimination in dopamine D2 receptor mutant mice

RATIONALE: Dopamine (DA) D2-like antagonists block several effects of cocaine, including its locomotor stimulant and interoceptive discriminative-stimulus effects. Because these compounds generally lack selectivity among the D2-like DA receptors, the specific roles of the subtypes remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: DA D2 receptor knockout (DA D2R KO), heterozygous (HET), and wild-type (WT) mice were used to study the role of D2 DA receptors in the effects of cocaine. Some effects of the relatively selective DA D2-like antagonist raclopride were also studied to further assess the role of D2 receptors. METHODS: DA D2R KO, HET, and WT mice were treated with cocaine (1-10 mg/kg) or vehicle, and their horizontal locomotor activity was assessed. The mice were also trained to discriminate i.p. injections of saline from cocaine (10 mg/kg) using a two-response key, fixed-ratio-20 response, food-reinforcement procedure. A range of doses of cocaine (1.0-17 mg/kg) was administered before 15-min test sessions. RESULTS: Both DA D2R KO and HET mice showed reduced levels of horizontal activity relative to WT mice. Cocaine dose dependently stimulated activity in each genotype, with the highest level of activity induced in the DA D2R WT mice. All three genotypes acquired the discrimination of 10 mg/kg cocaine; tested doses of 1.0-10.0 mg/kg produced dose-related increases in the number of cocaine-appropriate responses. Raclopride, at inactive to fully active doses (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), did not fully substitute for cocaine. Raclopride dose dependently shifted the cocaine dose-effect curve to the right in DA D2R WT and HET mice. However, in DA D2R KO mice, raclopride was inactive as an antagonist. CONCLUSIONS: The present data indicate an involvement of D2 DA receptors in the locomotor-stimulating effects and the interoceptive discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine in WT subjects. However, the D2 receptor is not necessary for the effects, suggesting redundant dopaminergic mechanisms for the discriminative-stimulus interoceptive effects of cocaine.     

Comparison of dopamine D1 and D5 receptor knockout mice for cocaine locomotor sensitization

RATIONALE: There is compelling support for the contribution of dopamine and the D1R-like (D1R, D5R) receptor subfamily to the behavioral and neural effects of psychostimulant drugs of abuse. The relative roles of D1R and D5R subtypes in mediating these effects are not clear. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to directly compare (C57BL/6J congenic) D1R knockout (KO) and D5R KO mice for baseline locomotor exploration, acute locomotor responses to cocaine, and locomotor sensitization to repeated cocaine administration, and to examine cocaine conditioned place preference (CPP) in D5R KO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: D1R KO, D5R KO, and wild-type (WT) were assessed for baseline open field exploration, locomotor-stimulating effects of 15 mg/kg acute cocaine and sensitized locomotor responses to cocaine after repeated home cage treatment with 20 or 30 mg/kg cocaine. D5R KO and WT were tested for CPP to 15 mg/kg cocaine. RESULTS: D1R KO showed modest basal hyperactivity and increased center exploration relative to WT. Acute locomotor responses to cocaine were consistently absent in D1R KO, but intact in D5R KO. D5R KO showed normal locomotor sensitization to cocaine and normal cocaine CPP. D1R KO failed to show a sensitized locomotor response to 30 mg/kg cocaine. Failure to sensitize in D1R KO was not because of excessive stereotypies. Surprisingly, D1R KO showed a strong trend for sensitization to 20 mg/kg cocaine. CONCLUSIONS: D5R KO does not alter acute or sensitized locomotor responses to cocaine or cocaine CPP. D1R KO abolishes acute locomotor response to cocaine, but does not fully prevent locomotor sensitization to cocaine at all doses.     

Cocaine and SKF-82958 potentiate brain stimulation reward in Swiss-Webster mice

RATIONALE: The dopamine D(1)-like receptor agonist SKF-82958 reportedly blocks reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in rats and non-human primates. It is not known if SKF-82958 reduces drug-seeking behaviors in animals exposed previously to cocaine by causing reward-like effects or withdrawal-like aversive effects. OBJECTIVES: Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) studies were conducted to determine if SKF-82958 has reward-like or withdrawal-like effects in mice exposed previously to cocaine, or under the influence of cocaine at the time of testing. METHODS: Swiss-Webster mice with lateral hypothalamic stimulating electrodes were trained to self-administer rewarding brain stimulation. The mice were tested in a "curve-shift" variant of the ICSS procedure after intraperitoneal administration of cocaine alone (2.5-20 mg/kg), SKF-82958 alone (0.03-0.3 mg/kg), or a mixture of both drugs (SKF 0.03 mg/kg + 2.5 or 5.0 mg/kg cocaine). Each treatment was given twice. RESULTS: Cocaine and SKF-82958 each caused dose-dependent decreases in brain stimulation reward thresholds that were largest immediately after administration. A dose of SKF-82958 with no reward-related effects of its own potentiated the reward-related effects of low doses of cocaine. Repeated administration did not cause progressive changes in the ability of any treatment to decrease thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Cocaine and SKF-82958 each potentiate the rewarding effects of lateral hypothalamic brain stimulation in Swiss-Webster mice, implying that these drugs have rewarding effects of their own. The reward-facilitating effects of low doses of cocaine and SKF-82958 are additive (or synergistic). These data suggest that SKF-82958 may decrease cocaine-seeking behavior by mechanisms related to reward rather than aversion.     

5-HT2 receptor antagonism reduces hyperactivity induced by amphetamine, cocaine, and MK-801 but not D1 agonist C-APB.

The hyperlocomotion induced by the noncompetitive NMDA antagonist MK-801 (0.3 mg/kg SC) in mice was attenuated by the nonselective 5-HT2 antagonist ritanserin (0.12 and 0.25 mg/kg SC) and by the 5-HT2A selective antagonist MDL100907 (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg SC). SB242084 (0.25-1.0 mg/kg), a selective 5-HT(2C) antagonist, had no effect on MK-801-induced hyperactivity. These same doses of ritanserin and MDL100907 reduced the hyperactivity induced by cocaine (10 mg/ kg). Amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg SC) induced hyperlocomotion that was also attenuated by ritanserin (0.064).25 mg/kg SC). The hyperlocomotion induced by the D1 agonist C-APB (1.0 mg/kg) is not altered by pretreatment with ritanserin or MDL100907. This suggests that compounds that increase locomotor activity via indirectly increasing dopaminergic activity (either by increased release or blockade of reuptake) require the activation of a 5-HT2A receptor. Activity of compounds that act directly at the postsynaptic dopamine receptors such as C-APB is not dependent on such a mechanism. This suggests a selective involvement of 5-HT2A receptors but not 5-HT2c receptors in the mediation of the behavioral effects of compounds that increase synaptic concentration of dopamine but not directly acting agonists. This implies that the 5-HT2A receptors modulate elevation of extracellular dopamine, not the postsynaptic sensitivity of dopamine neurons.     

Involvement of dopamine D3 and D4 receptors in the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine in the rat

The present study was carried out to determine the involvement of dopamine receptor subtypes D3 and D4, in the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in the rats trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg of cocaine from vehicle. The discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine (1-10 mg/kg) were dose-dependent. The dopamine D2 receptor agonist bromocriptine (1.25-20 mg/kg) and the dopamine D3 receptor agonist R(+)-7-OH-DPAT (0.0001-0.3 mg/kg) produced cocaine (10 mg/kg)-like discriminative stimulus effects. Both the dopamine D3 receptor antagonist GR103691 (1 mg/kg) and the dopamine D4 receptor antagonist L745870 (1 mg/kg) partially antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine (10 mg/kg) and the cocaine (10 mg/kg)-like discriminative stimulus effects of R(+)-7-OH-DPAT (0.3 mg/kg). L745870 (0.001 mg/kg) inhibited the antagonistic effects of GR103691 (1 mg/kg) on the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine (10 mg/kg), whereas the drug (0.001 mg/kg) enhanced the antagonistic effects of GR103691 (1 mg/kg) on the cocaine (10 mg/kg)-like discriminative stimulus effects of R(+)-7-OH-DPAT (0.3 mg/kg). GR103691 (1 mg/kg) in combination with L745870 (0.001 mg/kg) did not markedly affect the cocaine (10 mg/kg)-like discriminative stimulus effects of bromocriptine (20 mg/kg). These results suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine are different from the cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects of bromocriptine or R(+)-7-OH-DPAT, in terms of dopamine D3 and D4 receptors.     

Differential effects of the 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist M100907 and the 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonist SB242084 on cocaine-induced locomotor activity, cocaine self-administration and cocaine-induced reinstatement of responding.

These studies investigated the effects of antagonists selective for the 5-HT(2A), 5-HT(2B), or 5-HT(2C) receptor subtypes on behaviors elicited or maintained by cocaine. The selective 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist M100907 (0.5 mg/kg, SC) attenuated the locomotor activity elicited by 10 mg/kg cocaine, whereas the selective 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonist SB242084 (0.5 mg/kg IP) potentiated the locomotor stimulant effect of 10 mg/kg cocaine. The selective 5-HT(2B) antagonist SB215505 (3 mg/kg PO) did not alter cocaine-induced locomotor activity. In a second series of experiments, the effects of M100907 and SB242084 were examined in rats self-administering cocaine intravenously according to a progressive ratio schedule. M100907 (0.5-2 mg/kg) did not alter responding for cocaine at an infusion dose of 0.25 mg. Similarly M100907 (0.5 mg/kg) failed to alter responding for cocaine at infusion doses of 0.0625, 0.125 and 0.25 mg. SB242084 (0.5-1 mg/kg) increased responding for cocaine with the infusion dose set at 0.125 mg. Examination of the effects of SB242084 (0.5 mg/kg) on the cocaine dose response curve revealed significant increases in responding at the lowest doses of 0.0625 and 0.125 but not 0.25 mg. After completion of the self-administration experiments responding was extinguished. M100907 (0.5 mg/kg) attenuated the ability of experimenter administered cocaine (10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg) to reinstate lever pressing, whereas the priming effect of cocaine (10 mg/kg) was enhanced by SB242084. These results indicate distinct, and in some cases opposite, effects of a 5-HT(2A) compared with a 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonist on various cocaine-mediated behavioral effects.     

Effects of SCH 23390 and eticlopride on cocaine-seeking produced by cocaine and WIN 35,428 in rats

Rationale. Exposure to a small amount of cocaine can trigger relapse, and so an understanding of the mechanisms underlying cocaine-seeking are important for the development of effective anti-relapse treatments. Objectives. The present study sought to compare the contributions of dopamine D₁- and D₂-like receptors in drug-seeking produced by cocaine and WIN 35,428. Methods. Reinstatement of extinguished cocaine self-administration was measured for rats that received injections of cocaine (5.0–20.0 mg/kg) or WIN 35,428 (0.1–1.0 mg/kg) following extinction. Prior to the injection of cocaine or WIN 35,428, rats received an injection of the D₁-like antagonist, SCH 23390 (0.001–0.010 mg/kg) or the D₂-like antagonist, eticlopride (0.01–0.30 mg/kg). Effects of SCH 23390 (0.01 mg/kg) on cocaine-produced locomotor activation were also measured in separate groups of rats. Results. The ability of both cocaine and WIN 35,428 to produce cocaine-seeking was dose-dependent. Within the range of doses tested, SCH 23390 failed significantly to attenuate the ability of either cocaine or WIN 35,428 to reinstate extinguished cocaine self-administration, although cocaine-produced locomotor activation was significantly attenuated by pretreatment with the highest dose of SCH 23390. Eticlopride attenuated both cocaine and WIN 35,428 produced cocaine-seeking but lower doses were required to decrease WIN 35,428-produced cocaine-seeking. Conclusions. These results suggest that dopamine D₂ mechanisms are involved in cocaine-seeking produced by both cocaine and WIN 35,428. The lower potency of eticlopride in attenuating cocaine-produced cocaine-seeking suggest that cocaine's effects at sites other than the dopamine transporter contribute to its ability to elicit drug-seeking.     

Effect of the mGluR5 antagonist 6-methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (MPEP) on the acute locomotor stimulant properties of cocaine, <Emphasis Type="SmallCaps">d</Emphasis>-amphetamine,and the dopamine reuptake inhibitor GBR12909 in mice

Rationale Recent evidence suggests that, in addition to ascending monoaminergic systems, glutamate systems also play a role in psychostimulant-induced locomotor activity. The present study was conducted to examine the effects of the selective type-5 metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR5) antagonist 6-methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (MPEP) on the acute locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine, d-amphetamine, and the dopamine reuptake inhibitor GBR12909.Methods Male DBA/2J mice were treated with saline or MPEP (1, 5, 20 or 30 mg/kg i.p.) 10 min prior to the administration of cocaine (15 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg i.p.), d-amphetamine (3 mg/kg or 5 mg/kg i.p.) or GBR12909 (10 mg/kg or 20 mg/kg i.p.). Locomotor activity was then monitored in an open-field environment for 30 min. The effects of MPEP alone (1, 5, 20 and 30 mg/kg i.p.) on locomotor activity were also examined.Results MPEP dose dependently inhibited the acute locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine, d-amphetamine, and the 10-mg/kg dose of GBR12909. However, MPEP had no effect on the locomotor stimulant effects of the higher (20 mg/kg) dose of GBR12909. When tested alone, MPEP increased locomotor activity at doses of 5 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg.Conclusions Our data suggest that mGluR5 receptors not only mediate spontaneous locomotor activity in DBA/2J mice but also the acute locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine, d-amphetamine and lower doses of GBR12909. However, the fact that MPEP did not attenuate the locomotor stimulant effects of the high (20 mg/kg) dose of GBR12909 suggests complex interactions between metabotropic glutamate receptors, dopamine transporters and possibly other monoamines in the regulation of psychostimulant-induced locomotor activity.     

Antagonism of the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine at two training doses by dopamine D2-like receptor antagonists

RATIONALE: The relative contributions of different dopamine receptor subtypes to the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine may be influenced by the training dose of cocaine. Substitution tests with dopamine receptor agonists have suggested that the role of dopamine D2-like receptors is diminished relative to that of D1-like receptors at a training dose of 3 mg/kg cocaine compared with a training dose of 10 mg/kg. OBJECTIVES: To test whether dopamine D2-like receptor antagonists were differentially effective at attenuating cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects at different training doses, and to test for the first time an antagonist that is selective for the dopamine D2 receptor within the D2-like receptor subfamily. METHODS: Rats were trained to press one lever after receiving cocaine and another after receiving saline (maintaining >95% drug-appropriate responding). Three dopamine D2-like receptor antagonists (haloperidol, raclopride and L-741,626) were tested in rats trained at 3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg cocaine. At the lower training dose, the D1-like receptor antagonist SCH 39166 was also tested. RESULTS: The antagonists were not differentially effective between training groups: they all produced parallel, rightward shifts in cocaine's dose-effect function, indicating surmountable antagonism. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that D2-like receptor antagonists with different affinities for the various D2-like receptors can antagonise the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine at two training doses. Importantly, antagonism by L-741,626 implies that stimulation of D2 receptors alone (not D3 or D4 receptors) is sufficient to mediate cocaine's discriminative stimulus effects. Finally, the claim that D1-like receptors are preferentially involved at low training doses of cocaine is only consistent with the current findings if indirect stimulation of D2 receptors by low doses of cocaine remains necessary for the expression of the D1-like receptor-mediated effect.     

Analysis of D2 and D3 receptor-selective ligands in rats trained to discriminate cocaine from saline.

This study examined the role of dopamine D3 receptors in the stimulus generalization produced by 7-OH-DPAT and PD 128907 in rats trained to discriminate cocaine from saline. Twelve male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate cocaine (10 mg/kg) from saline in a two-choice operant procedure using a FR20 schedule of water reinforcement. Stimulus generalization tests were administered with the D3-preferring agonists (+/-)-7-OH-DPAT (0.01-0.3 mg/kg), (+)-7-OH-DPAT (0.01-0.3 mg/kg), and PD 128907 (0.01-0.3 mg/kg), and the selective D2 agonist PNU-39156 (0.01-0.3 mg/kg). Complete generalization to cocaine was observed with (+/-)-7-OH-DPAT at doses that markedly suppressed response rate. Only partial stimulus generalization was observed with (+)-7-OH-DPAT and PD 128907 when these compounds were administered intraperitoneally, although subcutaneous injections of these compounds produced complete substitution. Response rate was also significantly reduced by these compounds. The selective D2 agonist, PNU-91356 also fully substituted for the cocaine cue and suppressed response rate in a dose-dependent manner. To ascertain the importance of D3 receptor actions in the stimulus generalization produced by (+/-)-7-OH-DPAT (0.1 mg/kg) and PD-128907 (0.3 mg/kg), the fairly selective D3 antagonist, PNU-99194A (2.5-20 mg/kg) was also tested in combination with these compounds. Although PNU-99194A partially attenuated the stimulus generalization produced by (+/-)-7-OH-DPAT, it failed to block PD-128907 substitution for cocaine. These results indicate at least some involvement of D3 receptors in the stimulus effects of (+/-)-7-OH-DPAT, although further investigations are clearly warranted. The present results also suggest that the cue properties of cocaine may be dissociated from the locomotor activating effects of this drug, because D3/D2 receptor agonists suppress locomotor activity but produce stimulus generalization to cocaine.     

Antagonism of cocaine self-administration by selective dopamine D(1) and D(2) antagonists

Effects of the dopamine D(1) antagonist SCH 39166 were compared with those of the D(2) antagonist eticlopride in squirrel monkeys responding under a second-order fixed-interval schedule of i.v. self-administration of cocaine. Dose-response curves were determined for a range of doses of self-administered cocaine (0.01-1.7 mg/kg/injection) alone and after pretreatment with SCH 39166 (0.01-0.1 mg/kg) or eticlopride (0.001-0.006 mg/kg). Cocaine maintained self-administration behavior in a dose-related manner; as the dose of cocaine was increased, rates of responding first increased and then either decreased or leveled off. Optimum doses (0.03-0.3 mg/kg) maintained high rates of responding (0.7-1.7 responses per second) among the different monkeys, and patterns of responding that were characteristic for second-order schedules. Pretreatment with either SCH 39166 or eticlopride altered self-administration behavior in all monkeys. In most cases, dose-response curves for cocaine were shifted to the right, indicative of surmountable antagonism, and a 3 to 6-fold increase in dose of cocaine was necessary to restore optimal performances. In some instances, dose-response curves were shifted either downward or downward and to the right, indicating that the antagonistic effects of SCH 39166 and eticlopride were not always fully surmountable. These results show that self-administration of cocaine can be comparably modified by drugs that selectively block dopamine D(1) or D(2) receptors.     

Comparison of dopamine receptor antagonists on hyperlocomotion induced by cocaine, amphetamine, MK-801 and the dopamine D1 agonist C-APB in mice

Rationale: Direct or indirect stimulation of dopamine receptors increases locomotor activity in mice. Determining the role played by D₁ and D₂ dopamine receptors in the mediation of this activity can be difficult due to the wide variety of experimental paradigms used to investigate these phenomena. Objectives: This study set out to compare the role of selective antagonism of dopamine D₁ and D₂ receptors on the hyperactivity induced by a range of stimulants. Methods: Mice were habituated to perspex locomotor activity boxes (30×30× 30 cm) and activity was measured via photobeam interrupts. Results: Haloperidol and clozapine both reduced the hyperactivity induced by MK-801. Haloperidol did so only at a dose that also decreased spontaneous activity (0.1 mg/kg), whereas clozapine reduced MK-801-induced hyperactivity at a dose that had no effect on spontaneous activity (1.25 mg/kg). The D₁ antagonist SCH23390 (0.01 mg/kg) reduced hyperlocomotion induced by amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg), cocaine (10 mg/kg) and C-APB (1.0 mg/kg) at doses that did not consistently alter spontaneous activity, whereas the selective D₂ antagonist raclopride only attenuated the hyperlocomotion induced by amphetamine, cocaine and C-APB at doses in excess of the minimum dose required to attenuate spontaneous locomotor activity significantly. The latency to peak levels of hyperlocomotion induced by MK-801 (0.3 mg/kg) was delayed by SCH23390 (0.1 mg/kg) but peak levels of activity were not reduced. Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest that selective blockade of D₁ receptors suppresses amphetamine and cocaine-induced hyperactivity in mice but not MK-801-induced locomotor activity. Received: 1 January 1998 / Final version: 4 March 1999     

Evidence for involvement of both D1 and D2 receptors in maintaining cocaine self-administration.

Rats trained to self-administer cocaine (0.75 mg/kg/infusion) on an FR-5 schedule were treated with selective D1 or D2 antagonists. A69045, a D1 antagonist with no appreciable affinity for 5-HT receptors increased cocaine self-administration to 147, 172 and 167% of baseline at doses of 2.5, 5.0 or 10.0 mumol/kg, SC respectively. SCH-23390 (0.007, 0.015 and 0.030 mumol/kg, SC) increased self-administration to 116, 147 and 165% of baseline, respectively. Both D1 antagonists decreased responding in some animals at the highest dose tested. The D2 antagonist YM-09151-2 showed a similar profile, increasing cocaine self-administration at 0.01 and 0.016 mumol/kg, SC and suppressing responding by most animals at the dose of 0.03 mumol/kg, SC. These data give further support to the hypothesis that both D1 and D2 receptors are involved in maintaining cocaine self-administration.     

The effects of the novel DA D3 receptor antagonist SR 21502 on cocaine reward, cocaine seeking and cocaine-induced locomotor activity in rats

Rationale

There is a focus on developing D3 receptor antagonists as cocaine addiction treatments.

Objective

We investigated the effects of a novel selective D3 receptor antagonist, SR 21502, on cocaine reward, cocaine-seeking, food reward, spontaneous locomotor activity and cocaine-induced locomotor activity in rats.

Methods

In Experiment 1, rats were trained to self-administer cocaine under a progressive ratio (PR) schedule of reinforcement and tested with vehicle or one of three doses of SR 21502. In Experiment 2, animals were trained to self-administer cocaine under a fixed ratio schedule of reinforcement followed by extinction of the response. Then, animals were tested with vehicle or one of the SR 21502 doses on cue-induced reinstatement of responding. In Experiment 3, animals were trained to lever press for food under a PR schedule and tested with vehicle or one dose of the compound. In Experiments 4 and 5, in separate groups of animals, the vehicle and three doses of SR 21502 were tested on spontaneous or cocaine (10 mg/kg, IP)-induced locomotor activity, respectively.

Results

SR 21502 produced significant, dose-related (3.75, 7.5 and 15 mg/kg) reductions in breakpoint for cocaine self-administration, cue-induced reinstatement (3.75, 7.5 and 15 mg/kg) and cocaine-induced locomotor activity (3.75, 7.5 and 15 mg/kg) but failed to reduce food self-administration and spontaneous locomotor activity.

Conclusions

SR 21502 decreases cocaine reward, cocaine-seeking and locomotor activity at doses that have no effect on food reward or spontaneous locomotor activity. These data suggest SR 21502 may selectively inhibit cocaine’s rewarding, incentive motivational and stimulant effects.     

Comparison of interactions of D<Subscript>1</Subscript>-like agonists,SKF 81297, SKF 82958 and A-77636, with cocaine: locomotor activity and drug discrimination studies in rodents

RATIONALE: Recent data suggest that dopamine (DA) D1-like receptor full agonists may be potential pharmacotherapeutic agents for treating cocaine abuse. The structurally novel isochroman D1-like agonist, A-77636, has not been well characterized and may prove to be useful as such an agent. OBJECTIVES: The interactions of cocaine and A-77636 were compared to those obtained with the better investigated benzazepine D1-like dopamine agonists, SKF 82958 and SKF 81297. The alterations in the locomotor stimulant and discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine by the full D1-like dopamine receptor agonists were investigated across a full range of doses in order to characterize their interactions. METHODS: Drug-naive Swiss-Webster mice were pretreated with SKF 81297, SKF 82958 or A-77636 (1-10 mg/kg) and cocaine (5-56 mg/kg) prior to a 30-min period in which locomotor activity was assessed. Rats were trained on a fixed ratio 20 (FR20) schedule to discriminate IP saline from cocaine (10 mg/kg) injections. Cocaine alone (1-10 mg/kg) and with either A-77636 (0.56-1.7 mg/kg), SKF 82958 (0.01-0.1 mg/kg) or SKF 81297 (0.1-0.56) were injected IP 5 min prior to a 15-min test session. RESULTS: Cocaine maximally stimulated activity at 20-40 mg/kg with higher and lower doses stimulating activity less. Each D1-like agonist produced a dose-related decrease in cocaine-induced locomotor activity and lowered its maximal rate. Each of the D1-like agonists partially substituted for cocaine, with maximal substitution approximating 49, 35, and 24% for SKF 81297, SKF 82958, and A-77636, respectively. SKF 82958 significantly shifted the cocaine dose-effect curve approximately 3-fold to the left. With SKF 81297, there was a trend towards a leftward shift of cocaine dose effects, however the change was not statistically significant. In contrast to the other two D1-like agonists, A-77636 either did not affect the cocaine dose-effect curve or shifted it to the right. CONCLUSIONS: All three agonists produced similar effects on cocaine-induced locomotor activity, however the discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine were affected differently by the D1 agonists. These results suggest fundamental differences in the actions of these D1 agonists. Because A-77636 consistently attenuated the present effects of cocaine, it may prove more useful than the others as a pharmacotherapy to treat cocaine abuse.