Physical activity and survival after diagnosis of invasive breast cancer

Previous studies suggest that increased physical activity may lower the risk of breast cancer incidence, but less is known about whether levels of physical activity after breast cancer diagnosis can influence survival. We prospectively examined the relation between postdiagnosis recreational physical activity and risk of breast cancer death in women who had a previous invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 1988 and 2001 (at ages 20-79 years). All women completed a questionnaire on recent postdiagnosis physical activity and other lifestyle factors. Among 4,482 women without history of recurrence at the time of completing the questionnaire, 109 died from breast cancer within 6 years of enrollment. Physical activity was expressed as metabolic equivalent task-hours per week (MET-h/wk); hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression. After adjusting for age at diagnosis, stage of disease, state of residence, interval between diagnosis and physical activity assessment, body mass index, menopausal status, hormone therapy use, energy intake, education, family history of breast cancer, and treatment modality compared with women expending <2.8 MET-h/wk in physical activity, women who engaged in greater levels of activity had a significantly lower risk of dying from breast cancer (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.39-1.08 for 2.8-7.9 MET-h/wk; HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35-1.01 for 8.0-20.9 MET-h/wk; and HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.29-0.89 for > or =21.0 MET-h/wk; P for trend = 0.05). Results were similar for overall survival (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.32-0.60 for > or =21.0 versus <2.8 MET-h/wk; P for trend <0.001) and were similar regardless of a woman's age, stage of disease, and body mass index. This study provides support for reduced overall mortality and mortality from breast cancer among women who engage in physical activity after breast cancer diagnosis.     

Prospective study of body mass index,physical activity and thyroid cancer

Increased body size and physical inactivity are positively related to risk of several cancers, but only few epidemiologic studies have investigated body‐mass index (BMI) and physical activity in relation to thyroid cancer. We examined the relations of BMI and physical activity to thyroid cancer in a prospective cohort of 484,326 United States men and women, followed from 1995/1996 to 2003. During 3,490,300 person‐years of follow‐up, we documented 352 newly incident cases of thyroid cancer. The multivariate relative risks (RR) of thyroid cancer for BMI values of 18.5–24.9 (reference), 25.0–29.9 and ≥30 kg m^?2 were 1.0, 1.27 and 1.39 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05–1.85]. Adiposity predicted papillary thyroid cancers (RR comparing extreme BMI categories = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.03–2.10) and, based on small numbers, suggestively predicted follicular thyroid cancers (RR = 1.49; 95% CI = 0.79–2.82) and anaplastic thyroid cancers (RR = 5.80; 95% CI = 0.99–34.19). No relation with BMI was noted for medullary thyroid cancers (RR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.27–3.43). The positive relation of BMI to total thyroid cancer was evident for men but not for women. However, the test of interaction (p = 0.463) indicated no statistically significant gender difference. Physical activity was unassociated with thyroid cancer. The RRs of total thyroid cancer for low (reference), intermediate, and high level of physical activity were 1.0, 1.01 and 1.01 (95% CI = 0.76–1.34, p for trend = 0.931), respectively. Our results support an adverse effect of adiposity on risk for developing total and papillary, and possibly follicular thyroid cancers. Based on only 15 cases, adiposity was unrelated to medullary thyroid cancers. Physical activity was unrelated to total thyroid cancer.     

Influence of prediagnostic recreational physical activity on survival from breast cancer

Recreational physical activity (RPA) is associated with a reduced risk of developing breast cancer, but there is limited research on whether prediagnostic RPA influences survival after breast cancer diagnosis or not. We evaluated the association between prediagnostic RPA and risk of death in 1508 women with a first breast cancer diagnosis during 1996 and 1997 in the population-based Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project. A 5-year mortality, through the end of 2002, was assessed using the National Death Index (N=196). An in-person interview was completed shortly after diagnosis to obtain information on lifetime RPA, which was expressed as metabolic equivalent task hours per week (MET-h/week). A lower risk of all-cause death was observed for women who engaged in an average of 9 or more MET-h/week of RPA from menarche to diagnosis compared with women who did not exercise [age-adjusted and BMI adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.39-0.83], an association that was similar when evaluated according to menopausal status. Compared with women who did not engage in moderate RPA, those who engaged in any moderate intensity lifetime RPA (>0 MET-h/week) were found to have lower all-cause mortality (HR=0.62; 95% CI=0.46-0.84) and breast cancer-specific mortality (HR=0.64; 95% CI=0.43-0.93). Among postmenopausal women, RPA that took place after menopause resulted in a decrease in overall mortality, whereas no association was observed for RPA which took place prior to menopause (for >0 MET-h/week of RPA vs. no RPA, the HR=0.61; 95% CI=0.39-0.94 and HR=1.00; 95% CI=0.65-1.54, respectively). This study provides support that RPA prior to breast cancer diagnosis improves survival.     

Recreational physical activity and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in a large cohort of US women

Due to its potential effects on ovarian hormone production, physical activity has been proposed as a modifiable risk factor for breast cancer. The authors analyzed data from the American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II (CPS-II) Nutrition Cohort to examine the association between various measures of physical activity and postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Information on physical activity was obtained in 1992 via a self-administered questionnaire for 72,608 postmenopausal female participants who were cancer-free. During the five year prospective follow-up, 1520 incident breast cancer cases were identified among these women. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to compute hazard rate ratios (RR) and to adjust for potential confounding factors including mammography. Women who were most physically active (>42.0 MET-h/week) at baseline had 29% lower incidence rates than active women with the least activity (>0–7.0 MET-h/week) (95% CI, 0.49–1.02). The difference in risk was largest for localized breast cancer, and for women who did not use hormone replacement therapy (HRT) at enrollment. Our findings are consistent with other studies that show lower risk of postmenopausal breast cancer associated with regular physical activity.     

Obesity, recreational physical activity, and risk of pancreatic cancer in a large U.S. Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Obesity and physical activity, in part through their effects on insulin sensitivity, may be modifiable risk factors for pancreatic cancer. METHODS: The authors analyzed data from the American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort to examine the association between measures of adiposity, recreational physical activity, and pancreatic cancer risk. Information on current weight and weight at age 18, location of weight gain, and recreational physical activity were obtained at baseline in 1992 via a self-administered questionnaire for 145,627 men and women who were cancer-free at enrollment. During the 7 years of follow-up, 242 incident pancreatic cancer cases were identified among these participants. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to compute hazard rate ratios (RR) and to adjust for potential confounding factors including personal history of diabetes and smoking. RESULTS: We observed an increased risk of pancreatic cancer among obese [body mass index (BMI) >/= 30] men and women compared with men and women of normal BMI [<25; RR, 2.08; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.48-2.93, P(trend) = 0.0001]. After adjustment for between BMI, risk of pancreatic cancer was independently increased among men and women who reported a tendency for central weight gain compared with men and women reporting a tendency for peripheral weight gain (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.02-2.07). We observed no difference in pancreatic cancer incidence rates between men and women who were most active (>31.5 metabolic equivalent hours per week) at baseline compared with men and women who reported no recreational physical activity (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.63-2.27). CONCLUSION: This study, along with several recent studies, supports the hypothesis that obesity and central adiposity are associated with pancreatic cancer risk.     

Does obesity modify the relationship between physical activity and breast cancer risk?

Purpose

With only 5–10% of breast cancer cases attributed to genetic inheritance, prevention efforts have focused on modifiable risk factors. Physical activity plays a role in reducing breast cancer risk; however, the interaction between physical activity and other modifiable risk factors, such as obesity, has received little attention.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of studies examining the relationship between physical activity and breast cancer and how it may be modified by body mass index (BMI).

Results

A total of 29 papers were included: 18 were cohort and 11 were case–control studies. Overall, a significant reduction in the relative risk of breast cancer was found in postmenopausal women with high versus low levels of physical activity for women with a BMI <25 kg/m² (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79, 0.92) and ≥25 kg/m² (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81, 0.93) but not ≥30 kg/m² (RR: 0.93, 95% CI 0.76, 1.13). Physical activity was not associated with a significant reduction in risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women in any BMI group.

Conclusion

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that physical activity is associated with a larger breast cancer risk reduction among women who are normal weight or overweight than among women who are obese. Since the included studies used diverse methods for assessment of physical activity and categories of BMI, results should be interpreted with caution and additional work is needed.

     

Physical activity and breast cancer risk in the College Alumni Health Study (United States)

Objectives: It is unclear whether physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. Some studies also suggest different effects between pre- and postmenopausal women, and lean and heavy women.Methods: We followed 1,566 University of Pennsylvania alumnae (mean age, 45.5 years), initially free of breast cancer, from 1962 until 1993. Physical activity at baseline was assessed by asking women about stairs climbed, blocks walked, and sports played. We estimated energy expenditure and categorized women into approximate thirds (< 500, 500-999, 1,000+ kcal/wk). We identified 109 breast cancer cases during 35,365 person-years from follow-up questionnaires or from death certificates.Results: After adjustment for age and body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2), the relative risk (RR) of breast cancer was 0.92 (95 percent confidence interval [CI]=0.58-1.45) among women expending 500-999 kcal/wk and 0.73 (CI=0.46-1.14) for those expending 1,000+ kcal/wk, compared with women expending < 500 kcal/wk (P trend=0.17). This association was modified by menopausal status, but not BMI. For postmenopausal women, corresponding RRs were 0.95 (CI=0.58-1.57) and 0.49 (CI=0.28-0.86), respectively (P trend=0.015). Increased physical activity in premenopausal women was not significantly associated with decreased risk of breast cancer.Conclusions: These data support an inverse association between physical activity and breast cancer among postmenopausal women. Cancer Causes and Control 1998, 9, 433–439     

Physical activity and risk for breast cancer a prospective cohort study among Swedish twins

The epidemiologic association between physical activity and breast cancer has been corroborated in many studies. Some inconsistencies remain, possibly due to variation in life periods for exposure assessment, confounding and undetected effect modification. In our cohort study, we address some of these questions by taking into account physical activity in different periods of life and by investigating effect modification by birth cohort and body mass index (BMI). Altogether 9,539 same-sex twin women aged 42-70 years who answered a questionnaire about their work and leisure-time physical exercise from ages 25 to 50 during 1967 and 1970 were included in our cohort. During follow-up, 506 breast cancer cases occurred through 1997. We used multivariate Cox models to estimate relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). We found no associations between physical activity and breast cancer overall. Women born between 1901 and 1917 (aged 51-70 at baseline) who reported regular leisure-time activity had a borderline significant 40% lower risk compared with those who reported no activity (RR 0.6; 95% CI 0.4-1.0; test for trend, p = 0.07). This association appeared to be confined to women with a low BMI after the age of 50 and to women with a high BMI during the premenopausal period. We found no evidence that work activity reduces risk for breast cancer. The importance of physical activity for breast cancer risk seems to depend on birth cohort. The association may be limited to normal-weight postmenopausal women and overweight premenopausal women.     

Physical activity and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies

We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the evidence from prospective studies regarding the association between physical activity and breast cancer risk. A comprehensive search was conducted to identify eligible studies. The fixed or random effect model was used based on heterogeneity test. The dose–response relationship was assessed by restricted cubic spline model and multivariate random-effect meta-regression. Overall, 31 studies with 63,786 cases were included, and the combined relative risk (RR) with 95 % CI of breast cancer was 0.88 (0.85–0.91). In subgroup analysis by activity type, data from 27 studies including 37,568 cases for non-occupational activity (including recreational activity and household activity) and seven studies including 28,268 cases for occupational activity were used, and the RR (95 % CI) of breast cancer was 0.87 (0.83–0.91) and 0.90 (0.83–0.97), respectively. The inverse association was consistent among all subgroups analyses. Stronger association was found for subjects with BMI <25 kg/m² [0.72 (0.65–0.81)], premenopausal women [0.77 (0.72–0.84)], and estrogen and progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer [0.80 (0.73–0.87)]. Dose–response analysis suggested that the risk of breast cancer decreased by 2 % (P < 0.00) for every 25 metabolic equivalent (MET)-h/week increment in non-occupational physical activity, 3 % (P < 0.00) for every 10 MET-h/week (roughly equivalent to 4 h/week of walking in 2 miles/h or 1 h/week of running in 6 miles/h) increment in recreational activity, and 5 % (P < 0.00) for every 2 h/week increment in moderate plus vigorous recreational activity, respectively. Physical activity could significantly reduce the risk of breast cancer.     

Body size, physical activity, and breast cancer hormone receptor status: results from two case-control studies.

We evaluated whether our previous reports of increased postmenopausal breast cancer risk with higher body mass index (BMI) or of reduced premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer risk with higher physical activity levels varied according to the tumor's estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. Participants enrolled in either of two population-based case-control studies in Los Angeles County, California: one of premenopausal women (ages < or = 40 years), and one of postmenopausal women (ages 55-64 years). Case participants were diagnosed for the first time with in situ or invasive breast cancer from 7/1/83 through 12/31/88 (premenopausal women) or from 3/1/87 through 12/31/89 (postmenopausal women). Joint ER/PR status was collected for 424 premenopausal and 760 postmenopausal case participants. The analysis included 714 premenopausal and 1091 postmenopausal age-matched, race-matched (white or Hispanic), parity-matched (premenopausal women only), and residential neighborhood-matched control participants. Among the postmenopausal women, obesity was associated with an increased odds of ER+/PR+ breast cancer (odds ratio, 2.45 for women in the highest versus the lowest body mass index quartile; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-3.47). Body mass index was associated with neither ER-/PR- tumors among the postmenopausal women nor with any ER/PR subgroup among the premenopausal women. For both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, higher recreational physical activity levels (> or = 17.6 MET-hours/week versus no activity) were associated with a 30-60% reduction in risk of nearly all ER/PR subtypes, although the associations were generally of borderline statistical significance. Examining these potentially modifiable breast cancer risk factors by tumor ER and PR status may provide us with greater insight into breast cancer etiology and the mechanisms underlying the risk factor associations.     

Joint effects of body size,energy intake,and physical activity on breast cancer risk

To evaluate the joint effect of body size, energy intake, and physical activity on breast cancer risk, we analyzed information on body weight history, energy intake, anthropometric measurements, and physical activity patterns in a population based case–control study. Included in this analysis were 3,458 incidence breast cancer cases and 3,474 age-frequency matched controls from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study. High weight, height, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and weight gain showed stronger associations with breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women than premenopausal women. High total physical activity was inversely associated with postmenopausal breast cancer risk (p for trend = 0.026) and premenopausal breast cancer (p for trend = 0.059). The odds ratios for women with a high waist-to-hip ratio (≥0.84) and low total physical activity (≤10.9 MET-h/day) had the highest risk for breast cancer (OR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.4–4.9 for postmenopausal women, OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5–3.1 for premenopausal women) compared to their counterpart with low waist-to-hip ratio (<0.76) and high total physical activity (>20.5 MET-h/day). We did not find a statistically significant multiplicative interaction between body size, caloric intake and total physical activity on breast cancer risk.     

Physical activity and survival in postmenopausal women with breast cancer: results from the women's health initiative

Although studies have shown that physically active breast cancer survivors have lower all-cause mortality, the association between change in physical activity from before to after diagnosis and mortality is not clear. We examined associations among pre- and postdiagnosis physical activity, change in pre- to postdiagnosis physical activity, and all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality in postmenopausal women. A longitudinal study of 4,643 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer after entry into the Women's Health Initiative study of postmenopausal women. Physical activity from recreation and walking was determined at baseline (prediagnosis) and after diagnosis (assessed at the 3 or 6 years post-baseline visit). Women participating in 9 MET-h/wk or more (～ 3 h/wk of fast walking) of physical activity before diagnosis had a lower all-cause mortality (HR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44-0.87; P = 0.01) compared with inactive women in multivariable adjusted analyses. Women participating in ≥ 9 or more MET-h/wk of physical activity after diagnosis had lower breast cancer mortality (HR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.35-0.99; P = 0.049) and lower all-cause mortality (HR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38-0.79; P < 0.01). Women who increased or maintained physical activity of 9 or more MET-h/wk after diagnosis had lower all-cause mortality (HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.96) even if they were inactive before diagnosis. High levels of physical activity may improve survival in postmenopausal women with breast cancer, even among those reporting low physical activity prior to diagnosis. Women diagnosed with breast cancer should be encouraged to initiate and maintain a program of physical activity.     

Association of energy intake and energy balance with postmenopausal breast cancer in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.

Energy restriction remains one of the most effective ways known to prevent breast cancer in animal models. However, energy intake has not been consistently associated with risk of breast cancer in humans. In a prospective study, we assessed whether energy intake, body size, and physical activity each independently influence breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women and estimated the joint effect of combinations of these individual factors. As part of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial, 38,660 women, ages 55 to 74 years and recruited from 10 centers in the United States during 1993 to 2001, were randomized to the screening arm of the trial. At baseline, the women completed a self-administered questionnaire, including a food frequency questionnaire. During follow-up from 1993 to 2003, 764 incident breast cancer cases were ascertained. Women in the highest quartile of energy intake (> or = 2,084 kcal/d) compared with those in the lowest quartile (<1,316 kcal/d) had a significantly increased risk for breast cancer [multivariate relative risk (RR), 1.25; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.02-1.53; P(trend continuous) = 0.03]. Current body mass index (BMI) was also positively and significantly associated with risk (multivariate RR comparing >30 kg/m2 with <22.5 kg/m2, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.06-1.70; P(trend) = 0.01). Women with > or = 4 hours/wk of vigorous recreational physical activity had a significantly reduced risk of breast cancer compared with those who reported no recreational physical activity (multivariate RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60-0.99; P(trend) = 0.15). None of these associations with individual energy balance measures was substantially confounded by the other two measures. When we estimated the joint effect of all three variables, women with the most unfavorable energy balance (the highest energy intake, highest BMI, and least physical activity) had twice the risk (RR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.27-3.45) of women with the most favorable energy balance (the lowest energy intake, lowest BMI, and most physical activity). Although our estimates of absolute energy intake, based on a food frequency questionnaire, are imperfect, these results suggest that energy intake, in addition to BMI and physical activity may be independently associated with breast cancer risk. In addition, these three aspects of energy balance may act jointly in determining breast cancer risk.     

Physical activity, adiposity, and risk of endometrial cancer

Objective  We examined the associations of leisure-time physical activity and adiposity with endometrial cancer risk. Methods  Eligible subjects were 32,642 healthy US women, ≥45 years, from the Women’s Health Study. Women reported on questionnaires about their weight, height, and physical activity at baseline (1992–1995) and waist and hip circumference at 72 months. During an average follow-up of 8.8 years, 264 women developed endometrial cancer, confirmed using medical records. Results  The heaviest women (body mass index, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) had more than twice the risk of endometrial cancer as those who were least heavy (BMI < 22.5 kg/m²) [multivariable-adjusted relative risk, RR = 2.49 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.73, 3.59)]. Neither waist nor waist/hip ratio predicted risk in multivariate analyses. Leisure-time physical activity and walking were also unrelated to risk. Women reporting any vigorous activity had lower risk than those reporting none (multivariable-adjusted RR = 0.74 [0.56, 0.97]) independent of BMI, but there was no trend of declining risk with increasing energy expended in such activities. In examining the joint effects of BMI and physical activity, compared with active (≥15 MET-h/week), normal weight (BMI < 25) women, those who were both inactive (<15 MET-h/week) and overweight (BMI ≥ 25) had higher risk (multivariable-adjusted RR = 1.85 [1.26, 2.72]), as did women who were overweight and active (multivariable-adjusted RR = 1.60 [1.01, 2.54]), whereas normal weight, inactive women (multivariable-adjusted RR = 1.17 [0.77, 1.77]) did not. Conclusions  This study confirms BMI as a strong predictor of endometrial cancer risk. Central adiposity did not independently predict risk after adjustment for BMI; there also was no clear evidence of an inverse relation with leisure-time physical activity.     

Height, body mass index, and ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of 12 cohort studies.

BACKGROUND: Although many studies have investigated the association between anthropometry and ovarian cancer risk, results have been inconsistent. METHODS: The associations of height, body mass index (BMI), and ovarian cancer risk were examined in a pooled analysis of primary data from 12 prospective cohort studies from North America and Europe. The study population consisted of 531,583 women among whom 2,036 epithelial ovarian cancer cases were identified. To summarize associations, study-specific relative risks (RR) were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model and then combined using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Women with height > or =1.70 m had a pooled multivariate RR of 1.38 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.16-1.65] compared with those with height <1.60 m. For the same comparison, multivariate RRs were 1.79 (95% CI, 1.07-3.00) for premenopausal and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.04-1.49) for postmenopausal ovarian cancer (P(interaction) = 0.14). The multivariate RR for women with a BMI > or =30 kg/m(2) was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.86-1.22) compared with women with a BMI from 18.5 to 23 kg/m(2). For the same comparison, multivariate RRs were 1.72 (95% CI, 1.02-2.89) for premenopausal and 1.07 (95% CI, 0.87-1.33) for postmenopausal women (P(interaction) = 0.07). There was no statistically significant heterogeneity between studies with respect to height or BMI. BMI in early adulthood was not associated with ovarian cancer risk. CONCLUSION: Height was associated with an increased ovarian cancer risk, especially in premenopausal women. BMI was not associated with ovarian cancer risk in postmenopausal women but was positively associated with risk in premenopausal women.     

Circulating insulin and c-peptide levels and risk of breast cancer among predominately premenopausal women.

Insulin and insulin resistance have been hypothesized to increase the risk of breast cancer as insulin increases breast cell proliferation and inhibits sex hormone binding globulin. Although insulin is directly related to body weight, adiposity is inversely associated with breast cancer risk in premenopausal women but directly related to risk in postmenopausal women. To explore the association between insulin and c-peptide levels and breast cancer risk, we conducted a nested case-control study of predominantly premenopausal women within the Nurses' Health Study II cohort. From 1996 to 1999, blood samples were collected from 29,611 participants. A total of 317 cases were diagnosed after blood collection and before June 2003 and matched to 634 controls; 75% of these women were premenopausal at blood collection. Logistic regression models, controlling for breast cancer risk factors, were used to calculate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Among women with fasting blood samples (n = 211 cases), insulin was suggestively inversely associated with breast cancer risk (highest versus lowest quartile: RR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-1.0; P(trend) = 0.06). Among all women, c-peptide was not associated with breast cancer risk (highest versus lowest quartile: RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.7; P(trend) = 0.79); results were similar among fasting samples. These associations did not differ by age, body mass index, or waist-to-hip ratio. Overall, higher levels of insulin and c-peptide were not associated with a higher risk of breast cancer among predominantly premenopausal women.     

Body size and breast cancer risk: findings from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer And Nutrition (EPIC)

The evidence for anthropometric factors influencing breast cancer risk is accumulating, but uncertainties remain concerning the role of fat distribution and potential effect modifiers. We used data from 73,542 premenopausal and 103,344 postmenopausal women from 9 European countries, taking part in the EPIC study. RRs from Cox regression models were calculated, using measured height, weight, BMI and waist and hip circumferences; categorized by cohort-wide quintiles; and expressed as continuous variables, adjusted for study center, age and other risk factors. During 4.7 years of follow-up, 1,879 incident invasive breast cancers were identified. In postmenopausal women, current HRT modified the body size-breast cancer association. Among nonusers, weight, BMI and hip circumference were positively associated with breast cancer risk (all ptrend < or = 0.002); obese women (BMI > 30) had a 31% excess risk compared to women with BMI < 25. Among HRT users, body measures were inversely but nonsignificantly associated with breast cancer. Excess breast cancer risk with HRT was particularly evident among lean women. Pooled RRs per height increment of 5 cm were 1.05 (95% CI 1.00-1.16) in premenopausal and 1.10 (95% CI 1.05-1.16) in postmenopausal women. Among premenopausal women, hip circumference was the only other measure significantly related to breast cancer (ptrend = 0.03), after accounting for BMI. In postmenopausal women not taking exogenous hormones, general obesity is a significant predictor of breast cancer, while abdominal fat assessed as waist-hip ratio or waist circumference was not related to excess risk when adjusted for BMI. Among premenopausal women, weight and BMI showed nonsignificant inverse associations with breast cancer.     

Anthropometric variables, physical activity, and incidence of ovarian cancer: The Iowa Women's Health Study

BACKGROUND: Reports on the relation between anthropometric variables (height, weight) and physical activity with ovarian cancer have been inconclusive. The objective of the current study was to extend investigation of potential associations in the Iowa Women's Health Study cohort. METHODS: The relation between self-reported anthropometric variables and incident ovarian cancer was studied in a prospective cohort of women ages 55-69 years who were followed for 15 years. Two hundred twenty-three incident cases of epithelial ovarian cancer were identified by linkage to a cancer registry. RESULTS: No association was found overall between ovarian cancer and height, but a positive association was observed for serous ovarian cancers (relative risk [RR], 1.86 for highest quartile vs. lowest quartile; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.06-3.29). Although current body mass index (BMI) was not associated with ovarian cancer, a BMI > or =30 kg/m2 at age 18 years appeared to be associated positively with ovarian cancer (multivariate-adjusted RR, 1.83 for BMI > or =30 kg/m2 vs. BMI <25 kg/m2; 95% CI, 0.90-3.72), and this association was stronger after exclusion of the first 2 years of follow-up (RR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.05-4.40). In a multivariate analysis, waist-to-hip ratio was associated with ovarian cancer (RR, 1.59 for highest quartile vs. lowest quartile; 95% CI, 1.05-2.40), but a linear dose response was not found. An index that combined the frequency and intensity of leisure-time physical activity was associated positively with ovarian cancer incidence (multivariate-adjusted RR, 1.42 for high activity vs. low activity; 95% CI, 1.03-1.97). This association was particularly strong for frequency of vigorous physical activity (multivariate-adjusted RR, 2.38 for >4 times per week vs. rarely/never; 95% CI, 1.29-4.38). CONCLUSIONS: Anthropometric variables were not major risk factors for ovarian cancer in the cohort studied; however, high BMI in early adulthood and frequent and vigorous physical activity may increase the risk of ovarian cancer among postmenopausal women.     

Anthropometry, breast cancer and menopausal status: use of repeated measurements over 10 years of follow-up-results of the French E3N women's cohort study

The association between weight, BMI and breast cancer was analyzed on 94,805 women of the E3N cohort according to their menopausal status. Seven hundred eighty-six incident invasive premenopausal breast cancers and 1,522 incident invasive postmenopausal breast cancers occurred during a mean follow-up of 9.7 years. Weight and BMI were updated every 24 months and considered as time-dependent variables. Data were analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Trend RRs of premenopausal breast cancer were 0.97 (0.92-1.01) for a 5 kg increase in weight and 0.96 (0.91-1.01) for a 2 kg/m(2) increase in BMI, adjusted for other known risk factors. Opposite trend RRs were found after menopause: 1.05 (1.02-1.08) for weight and 1.06 (1.02-1.09) for BMI, respectively, for similar increases. Women with a BMI of over 30 kg/m(2) had a RR of premenopausal breast cancer of 0.66 (0.40-1.10) compared to those with a BMI of between 18.5 and 25 kg/m(2). Postmenopausal women with a BMI of over 30 kg/m(2) had a RR of breast cancer of 1.23 (1.00-1.59). The increase in risk of postmenopausal breast cancer with increased weight or BMI was similar whatever the HRT used, although the point estimates were higher in HRT users. We strongly recommend to use anthropometric measurements updated during follow-up to assess the effect of weight, BMI on breast cancer risk.     

Body mass index and physical activity as risk factors for pancreatic cancer: the Multiethnic Cohort Study

Objective To examine body mass index (BMI) and physical activity as risk factors for pancreatic cancer. Methods Eight-year prospective data from 77,255 men and 90,175 women including 237 and 235 pancreatic cancer cases, respectively, in the Hawaii-Los Angeles Multiethnic Cohort Study were analyzed. Participants completed a questionnaire that included questions on body weight, height, and physical activity. Cox proportional hazards models were calculated to estimate relative risks (RR) of pancreatic cancer by levels of BMI and total physical activity (as metabolic equivalents (METs)) adjusted for several potential confounders. Results Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) was associated with an increased pancreatic cancer risk in men (RR = 1.51 (95% CI: 1.02–2.26)), but a reduced risk in women (RR = 0.65 (95% CI: 0.43–0.99)). In men the risk was higher in never smokers than in current or former smokers, though differences were not statistically significant. Physical activity was not associated with pancreatic cancer risk in either men or women. Conclusion The findings suggest, that a BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m² may be a risk factor for pancreatic cancer in men. No evidence of an effect of physical activity on risk was found.