Understanding and Treating Dyslipidemia Associated With Noninsulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension

Hypertension and diabetes appear to increase coronary heart disease risk in part by causing an abnormality in lipid metabolism. Most affected are patients with familial dyslipidemic hypertension (FDH) and noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The lipid disorders most often encountered in these patients are increased levels of triglycerides, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, and small, dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. These abnormalities appear to result from increased hepatic secretion of VLDL particles due to increased concentrations of free fatty acids and glucose, reduced VLDL clearance due to reduced activity of lipoprotein lipase, and reduced LDL clearance due to glycosylation of ligand proteins. Treatment of the dyslipidemia associated with FDH should follow the guidelines from the National Cholesterol Education Program. Treatment in men and women with NIDDM should be considered when LDL cholesterol levels are 130 mg/dl or above, triglyceride levels are 200 mg/dl or above, or non-HDL cholesterol levels are 160 mg/dl or greater. Aggressive lifestyle changes should be initiated first, including weight loss in obese patients, control of glucose levels in those with NIDDM, avoidance of antihypertensive drugs that may worsen lipid levels in patients with FDH, and eating a diet restricting saturated fat and cholesterol. Addition of lipid-altering drugs should be considered if such changes do not achieve effective lipid control. The agent should be tailored to the patient's lipid profile, in general by using bile acid resins, niacin, or reductase inhibitors to lower LDL cholesterol and gemfibrozil or niacin to lower triglycerides. Niacin should be avoided in patients with NIDDM.     

Niacin for dyslipidemia: considerations in product selection.

The efficacy and safety profiles of various forms of niacin for treating dyslipidemia are described. Niacin is well recognized for treating dyslipidemia in adults and has been shown to be effective in reducing coronary events. It has a broad range of effects on serum lipids and lipoproteins, including lowering total cholesterol, low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides. Niacin is the most effective lipid-modifying drug for raising high-density-lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels and has been shown to lower Lp(a) lipoprotein. Niacin reduces triglycerides and very-low-density-lipoprotein and LDL cholesterol synthesis, primarily by decreasing fatty acid mobilization from adipose tissue. Niacin appears to raise HDL cholesterol by reducing hepatic apolipoprotein A-l clearance and enhancing reverse cholesterol transport. Niacin is metabolized through a conjugation or nicotinamide pathway. Standard immediate-release niacin is metabolized primarily through the conjugation pathway, which results in a high frequency of flushing. Long-acting niacin is metabolized through the nicotinamide pathway, which results in less flushing but increases the risk of hepatotoxicity. Extended-release niacin has a more balanced metabolism and causes fewer of both types of adverse effects. Improved serum lipid levels during niacin therapy have been associated with clinical and angiographic evidence of reduced coronary artery disease, especially when combined with statins. Niacin is particularly useful for managing high triglyceride and low HDL cholesterol levels as well as the lipid abnormalities associated with metabolic syndrome, including those commonly encountered in patients with diabetes. Several niacin products are available with significant differences in their safety and efficacy profiles. Health care providers must consider the differences between agents when recommending niacin for dyslipidemia treatment.     

Treating dyslipidemic patients with lipid-modifying and combination therapies

Updated guidelines from the National Cholesterol Education Program give greater emphasis to lipoproteins other than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) than previous guidelines. Although statins remain first-line therapy for most patients to lower LDL, combination therapy is the next logical step in achieving goals in patients with mixed dyslipidemia or elevated LDL despite statin therapy. As the prevalence of diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and atherogenic dyslipidemia rises, the importance of treating the total lipid profile becomes even more crucial. Niacin, fibrates, and bile acid sequestrants are effective in combination with statins in lowering LDL, triglycerides, and total cholesterol levels and increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL). Although combination therapies may increase the risk of myopathy, both fibrate-statin and niacin-statin combinations are considered safe. In addition, niacin-statin therapy reduces atherosclerotic progression and coronary events. New pharmacologic formulations exist that will further affect treatment: a single-tablet combination of lovastatin and extended-release niacin is available, as is ezetimibe, a cholesterol-absorption inhibitor. In all, both HDL and triglyceride levels correlate with cardiovascular risk and should be considered secondary targets of therapy. Combination therapy can be safe and effective and can be constructed to affect all lipoprotein parameters.     

Combination Therapy with Low-Dose Lovastatin and Niacin Is as Effective as Higher-Dose Lovastatin

Study Objectives . To determine if low-dose lovastatin in combination with niacin causes a greater percentage reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol than lovastatin alone, and to determine if the combination increases the risk of serious adverse effects. Design . Prospective, randomized, open-label, clinical trial. Setting . Family medicine clinic of a university-affiliated hospital. Patients . Patients with fasting LDL cholesterol concentrations of at least 150 mg/dl after 4 weeks of dietary stabilization and washout of any cholesterol-lowering drugs. Interventions . Twenty-eight patients received lovastatin 20 mg/day for 4 weeks after dietary stabilization and washout. If LDL cholesterol remained above 130 mg/dl (100 mg/dl in patients with coronary artery disease), they were randomized to receive either lovastatin 40 mg/day or a combination of lovastatin 20 mg/day and niacin 500 mg 3 times/day. Measurements and Main Results . There was no difference in actual or percentage reductions of LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglycerides between the groups. A greater increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol occurred with combination therapy (p=0.024). There was no difference in liver function tests, glucose, or uric acid between the therapies. Based on drug-acquisition cost, combination therapy is approximately 40% less expensive than monotherapy. Conclusion . Low-dose niacin plus low-dose lovastatin was as effective as higher-dose lovastatin in lowering total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. The combination may offer benefit in raising HDL cholesterol levels.     

Clinical trials and lipid guidelines for type II diabetes

The management of dyslipidemia in adults with diabetes is receiving more attention. However, there is a paucity of large, prospective, randomized outcome trials designed for diabetic patients. Diabetic dyslipidemia is characterized by an increase in triglyceride levels, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations, and small, dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles. The treatment goals include an LDL cholesterol less than 100 mg/dL, triglyceride level less than 150 mg/dL, and an HDL greater than 40 mg/dL for men and more than 50 mg/dL for women. In the Diabetic Atherosclerosis Intervention Study, fenofibrate resulted in a 42% less increase in the percent stenosis, as assessed by quantitative coronary arteriography. The Heart Protection Study documented the unambiguous benefit of simvastatin in reducing all-cause mortality among 5963 diabetic patients. The Lescol Intervention Prevention Study observed a reduction in major adverse cardiac events in diabetics undergoing percutaneous intervention who received fluvastatin. The Veterans Affairs HDL Cholesterol Intervention Trial reported a reduction in major coronary events among 627 diabetic patients with low HDL cholesterol who sustained a myocardial infarction. The Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetics (FIELD) Trial (n = 9795), the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD, n = 10,000), the Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in Non Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (ASPEN, n = 2421), and the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS, n = 2140) will provide the prospective outcome data that are needed for the management of patients. Combination drug therapy will be necessary to achieve treatment goals. Careful monitoring will be required to avoid myositis and hepatotoxicity.     

Combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus

INTRODUCTION: A significant drop in cardiovascular risk has been seen in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with statins. However, this cardiovascular risk remains high, compared with nondiabetic individuals. This is partly due to the typical abnormalities of diabetic dyslipidemia - hypertriglyceridemia and decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) - that are uncontrolled by statins. For this reason, combination lipid therapy may be considered in patients with type 2 diabetes. AREAS COVERED: This review presents the main reasons for a combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes and the effects of several drugs, including fibrates, pioglitazone, niacin and omega 3, on diabetic dyslipidemia and the prevention of cardiovascular events. The real cardiovascular benefit of fibrates in patients with type 2 diabetes is not totally clear, but they may produce a significant benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic dyslipidemia (hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL-C). Pioglitazone, which reduces triglycerides and increases HDL-C, has been shown to reduce the risk for major cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes. Niacin and omega 3 fatty acids have a positive effect on diabetic dyslipidemia, but warrants clinical trials to demonstrate a clear cardiovascular benefit in type 2 diabetes. EXPERT OPINION: Although combination lipid therapy seems to be useful to control diabetic dyslipidemia, the efficacy of such combined therapies on significantly reducing cardiovascular risk has still to be confirmed by additional clinical trials.     

Baseline triglyceride levels and insulin sensitivity are major determinants of the increase of LDL particle size and buoyancy induced by rosuvastatin treatment in patients with primary hyperlipidemia

The influence of various statins on low-density-lipoprotein (LDL)-particle phenotype has been reportedly trivial or moderate. We assessed the effect of rosuvastatin (the newest statin available) on the LDL subfraction profile in patients with primary hyperlipidemia. One hundred and twenty patients with primary hyperlipidemia without evidence of cardiovascular disease were randomized to therapeutic lifestyle modification ('control' group, N=60) or therapeutic lifestyle modification plus rosuvastatin 20 mg/day (N=60). Laboratory evaluation was performed at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. LDL subfraction analysis was carried out electrophoretically using of high-resolution 3% polyacrylamide gel tubes and the Lipoprint LDL System. Rosuvastatin induced a redistribution of LDL-cholesterol from small-dense LDL particles to large-buoyant ones and increased the mean LDL particle size. This beneficial effect was observed only in patients with baseline triglyceride levels >or=150 mg/dl (mean LDL particle size 255+/-7 A vs 260+/-5 A, P<0.01), whereas the LDL subfraction profile was not altered in those with triglyceride levels <150 mg/dl. Stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that baseline triglyceride levels (R(2)=0.29, P=0.001) followed by baseline insulin resistance as assessed by the HOmeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) (R(2)=0.25, P=0.001) were independently associated with the rosuvastatin-induced increase in the mean LDL particle size. In conclusion, rosuvastatin at 20 mg/day favorably modified the relative distribution of LDL-cholesterol distribution on LDL subfractions as well as on the mean LDL particle size in patients treated for primary dyslipidemia. Baseline triglyceride levels as well as baseline HOMA-index were found to be the major predictors of this beneficial action of rosuvastatin.     

Combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Introduction: A significant drop in cardiovascular risk has been seen in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with statins. However, this cardiovascular risk remains high, compared with nondiabetic individuals. This is partly due to the typical abnormalities of diabetic dyslipidemia – hypertriglyceridemia and decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) – that are uncontrolled by statins. For this reason, combination lipid therapy may be considered in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Areas covered: This review presents the main reasons for a combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes and the effects of several drugs, including fibrates, pioglitazone, niacin and omega 3, on diabetic dyslipidemia and the prevention of cardiovascular events. The real cardiovascular benefit of fibrates in patients with type 2 diabetes is not totally clear, but they may produce a significant benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic dyslipidemia (hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL-C). Pioglitazone, which reduces triglycerides and increases HDL-C, has been shown to reduce the risk for major cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes. Niacin and omega 3 fatty acids have a positive effect on diabetic dyslipidemia, but warrants clinical trials to demonstrate a clear cardiovascular benefit in type 2 diabetes.

Expert opinion: Although combination lipid therapy seems to be useful to control diabetic dyslipidemia, the efficacy of such combined therapies on significantly reducing cardiovascular risk has still to be confirmed by additional clinical trials.     

Dyslipidemias in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Classification and Risks and Benefits of Therapy

To characterize the lipid and lipoprotein abnormalities in patients with diabetes mellitus and evaluate the risks and benefits of marketed pharmacologic therapies, a MEDLINE search of the National Library of Medicine data base was performed of studies published from January 1966 to March 1994. Clinical trials assessing effects on lipids and lipoproteins, and adverse effects of marketed lipid-lowering agents were extracted. Reviews and other relevant articles were included if they provided information regarding lipid and lipoprotein metabolism or guidelines on the treatment of dyslipidemias in patients with diabetes mellitus. An extensive review of clofibrate was not included. The most common dyslipidemia in patients with poorly controlled insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is combined elevated triglyceride and cholesterol levels, with reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (mixed hyperlipidemia). Hypertriglyceridemia combined with a reduced HDL cholesterol is the most common dyslipidemia in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, but essentially any pattern of dyslipidemia may be present. Small and dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL), glycosylation of lipoproteins, and increased oxidized lipoproteins may be present in patients with diabetes mellitus; all contribute to accelerated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Insulin therapy generally corrects quantitative lipid abnormalities in patients with IDDM, so drug treatment is seldom indicated. Diet, exercise, and insulin or oral sulfonylureas will improve hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL concentrations, but do not always return them to normal. Drug therapy is indicated when nonpharmacologic measures are inadequate. It is administered based on the effects of each agent on lipids and lipoproteins, patient age, adverse effect profile, patient tolerability, and drug-disease and drug-drug interactions. A fibric acid derivative is the drug of choice for marked hypertriglyceridemia in patients with diabetes mellitus. Niacin can worsen glycemic control, but it may be required in severe hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, or mixed hyperlipidemia. Bile-acid binding resins may accentuate hypertriglyceridemia but may be useful in selected patients with marked hypercholesterolemia and normal triglycerides. Hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors are preferred in patients with elevated LDL cholesterol and mild hypertriglyceridemia. Patients with marked lipid abnormalities or mixed hyperlipidemias may require carefully dosed combinations of lipid-lowering drugs.     

Assessment of hypercholesterolemia control in a managed care organization.

To determine the extent of achievement of goal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) as defined by National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel II (NCEP-ATP 11) and American Diabetes Association (ADA) 2000 guidelines, we conducted a retrospective study by integrating data from medical, laboratory, and pharmacy claims databases. Subjects were selected from a 232,000-member staff-model managed care organization consisting of 19 clinics in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, metropolitan area. A total of 124,971 members aged 18 years and older, who had been continuously enrolled from July 1, 1996-June 6, 1998, were included. Outcome measures were the extent of achievement of goal LDL as defined by NCEP-ATP II and the use of antihyperlipidemic drugs for patients with and without diabetes at various levels of risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). Of 124,971 subjects, 6538 had a history of CHD, 1523 of whom met their LDL goal. Of the population with CHD who did not achieve goal, 1141 (43%) missed by over 30 mg/dl; 621 (54%) of these patients were not receiving drug therapy A total of 17,267 had no history of CHD but had two or more risk factors; 3,298 of these achieved their LDL goal. Of those who did not achieve goal, 1,136 (35%) missed by over 30 mg/dl; 897 (79%) of these were not receiving drug therapy A total of 6,586 had a history of diabetes; 1,004 and 2,340 reached an LDL of 100 mg/dl or lower and less than 130 mg/dl, respectively Of those with diabetes who had an LDL greater than 100 mg/dl, 1,276 (49%) missed their goal by over 30 mg/dl; 898 (70%) of these were not receiving drug therapy. Inadequate use of pharmacologic agents plays a significant role in failure to achieve goal LDL for patients with CHD, without CHD, and with diabetes. Analysis of the data based on the new ADA guidelines for LDL demonstrates the need for continued vigilance. Finally, the successful merging of medical, laboratory, and pharmacy claims databases provides a benchmark for other institutions.     

Management of Diabetic Dyslipidemia

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality among people with diabetes mellitus, accounting for 70% of all deaths. As the prevalence of diabetes increases significantly worldwide, greater attention must be focused on preventing cardiovascular events in this group. One contributor to this increased event rate is the characteristic pattern of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients, consisting of elevated serum triglyceride levels, decreased high-density lipoprotein levels, and an increased proportion of small, dense, low-density lipoproteins. Several pharmacologic agents have been used to treat this dyslipidemia including HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, fibric acid derivatives, niacin (nicotinic acid), thiazolidinediones, and fish oils, as well as other non-pharmacologic measures. Currently, the most extensive data for a reduction in cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes exist for HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. The results of these trials indicate that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy should be considered for all patients with diabetes at sufficient risk for cardiovascular events, regardless of serum low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol level. Several ongoing trials of various pharmacologic agents should help clarify the role of these agents alone and in combination with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in the management of diabetic dyslipidemia.     

Diabetic dyslipidaemia: current treatment recommendations

Insulin deficiency and hyperglycaemia in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus produce lipid abnormalities, which can be corrected by appropriate insulin therapy. Diabetic nephropathy, which is the main risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) in type 1 diabetes, causes pro-atherosclerotic changes in lipid metabolism. Detection and treatment of elevated cholesterol levels is likely to be of benefit in these patients. Type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus is associated with abnormal lipid metabolism, even when glycaemic control is good and nephropathy absent. Elevated triglyceride levels, reduced high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and a preponderance of small, dense low density lipoprotein (LDL) particles are the key abnormalities that constitute diabetic dyslipidaemia. The prevalence of hypercholesterolaemia is the same as for the nondiabetic population, but the relative risk of CHD is greatly increased at every level of cholesterol. Based on effectiveness, tolerability and clinical trial results, treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors to lower LDL cholesterol is recommended as primary therapy. These agents are also moderately effective at reducing triglyceride and increasing HDL cholesterol levels. If hypertriglyceridaemia predominates, treatment with fibric acid derivatives is appropriate, although there is currently only limited clinical trial evidence that the risk of CHD will be reduced. In type 1 diabetes, but particularly in type 2 diabetes, lipid disorders are likely to contribute significantly to the increased risk of macrovascular complications. especially CHD. Management of the disordered lipid metabolism should be given a high priority in the clinical care of all patients with diabetes.     

Analysis of serum lipids and lipoproteins in Ethiopian diabetic patients

Serum lipids and lipoproteins were determined in 302 randomly selected diabetic patients attending the Tikur Anbessa Hospital diabetic clinic. The main objective of the study was to analyse lipid levels in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. Lipid measurement was done by cholesterol pap method. The mean age was 41.4 +/- 14.4 years (range 14-85 years). One hundred sixty (53%) were males and 142 (47%) were females. There were 140 (46.4%) type 1 and 162 (53.6%) type 2 patients. The mean duration of diabetes mellitus, haemoglobin A1c, fasting blood glucose and random blood glucose were 9.4 +/- 5.4 years, 10.4 +/- 2.2%, 195.5 +/- 79.9 mg/dl and 273.1 +/- 114.5 mg/dl respectively. The mean cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL, VLDL and HDL were 166.5 +/- 45.5 mg/dl, 129.9 +/- 92.4 mg/dl, 94.5 +/- 36.4 mg/dl, 24.4 +/- 15.1 mg/dl and 44.3 +/- 11.5 mg/dl respectively. Hypercholesterolemia and Hypertriglyceridemia were seen in 18.5% and 14.2% of the patients. Total cholesterol was significantly higher in females than in males and in type 2 than in type 1 patients (179.3 +/- 48.4 mg/dl versus 154.1 +/- 38.2 mg/dl, P < 0.01 and 183.2 +/- 43.7 mg/dl versus 145.9 +/- 37.6 mg/dl, P < 0.001) respectively. Triglycerides and LDL cholesterol were also significantly higher in type 2 diabetic patients than in type 1 diabetic patients (162.7 +/- 10.5 mg/dl versus 91.5 +/- 53.3 mg/dl, P < 0.001 and 105.6 +/- 36.2 mg/dl versus 81.9 +/- 32.2 mg/dl, P < 0.001), but HDL cholesterol was the same in both types of diabetic patients. Similarly, hyperlipidemia was associated with obesity and hypertension. The study confirms that lipid values are high particularly in type 2 diabetic patients. Hence our patients are at increased risk of developing atherosclerosis therefore periodic check up of lipids in diabetic patients and effective treatment of the dyslipidemia along with a tight metabolic control was recommended.     

Niacin extended-release/simvastatin

Niacin extended-release (ER)/simvastatin is a once-daily, fixed-dose combination of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin and an ER formulation of niacin (a B-complex vitamin). In healthy volunteers who were given niacin ER/simvastatin 2000 mg/40 mg, niacin exposure was similar to that with niacin ER 2000 mg, while simvastatin exposure was increased compared to that with simvastatin 40 mg. In patients with elevated non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) but with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at or below the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goal after a > or = 2-week simvastatin 20 mg/day run-in period (SEACOAST I), 24 weeks of niacin ER/simvastatin 1000 mg/20 mg or 2000 mg/20 mg per day reduced median plasma non-HDL-C levels to a significantly greater extent than simvastatin 20 mg/day. In patients with elevated non-HDL-C and LDL-C at any level after a > or = 2-week simvastatin 40 mg/day run-in period (SEACOAST II), 24 weeks of niacin ER/simvastatin 1000 mg/40 mg or 2000 mg/40 mg per day was noninferior to simvastatin 80 mg/day in reducing median plasma non-HDL-C levels. Compared with simvastatin monotherapy, there was no significant difference in reduction in plasma LDL-C levels with niacin ER/simvastatin in SEACOAST I, and the noninferiority criterion for LDL-C was not met in SEACOAST II. However, plasma HDL-C levels increased more and triglyceride levels were lowered more than with simvastatin monotherapy (SEACOAST I and II). Niacin ER/simvastatin was generally well tolerated, with flushing being the most common adverse reaction.     

Clinical impact of a pharmacist-managed diabetes mellitus drug therapy management service

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacist interventions, including drug therapy management, on outcomes relevant to diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Ambulatory, multispecialty physician group practice within a managed care environment in suburban Chicago, Illinois. PATIENTS: Three hundred sixteen patients aged 18 years or older, with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (89% with type 2), who were referred to a clinical pharmacy service. INTERVENTION: Drug therapy management and education service provided by a clinical pharmacist. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were collected for glycosylated hemoglobin A(1c) (A1C), blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), and triglyceride concentrations. Data also were collected regarding patient adherence with American Diabetes Association guidelines for preventive care, including annual eye and foot examinations, influenza shots, and daily aspirin use at both baseline and follow-up. Mean +/- SD A1C reduction was 1.4% +/- 1.94% (p<0.001); the percentage of patients whose A1C was at goal level at baseline (< 7%) increased from 14.8% to 43.2% (p<0.001). Mean +/- SD LDL level reduction was 14 +/- 41.1 mg/dl (p=0.002), mean +/- SD triglyceride level reduction 42 +/- 97.6 mg/dl (p<0.001). The percentage of patients who reached goal for LDL level (< 100 mg /dl), HDL level (> 40 mg/dl), and blood pressure (< 130/80 mm Hg) did not increase significantly from baseline, whereas those who reached the triglyceride level goal (< 150 mg/dl) increased from 36% to 55% (p<0.005). Frequency of annual dilated retinal examinations and monofilament foot examinations increased by 29% (p<0.05) and 12.5% (p<0.05), respectively. Daily aspirin use increased from 35% to 59% (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Significant clinical improvement occurred in patients referred to the pharmacist in a diabetes drug therapy management program.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of simvastatin and lovastatin/extended- release niacin to achieve LDL and HDL goal using NHANES data

OBJECTIVE: The Third Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults, Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) encouraged reduced low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels for a greater number of patients and reemphasized the benefits of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. The purpose of this study was to compare 2 regimens achieving simultaneous LDL and HDL goals. METHODS: A decision-analytic model compared the cost-effectiveness of simvastatin and lovastatin/extended-release niacin. The perspective of the analysis was that of a health system. Product labeling was used to determine changes in cholesterol concentrations and frequencies of clinically important adverse events. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) adult data were used for baseline cholesterol levels. Each product was titrated to achieve LDL and HDL goals unless an adverse effect occurred. Direct medical costs were determined for each treatment to determine cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: For both the 130 mg/dL and 100 mg/dL LDL goal analyses (and HDL e40 mg/dL), lovastatin/extended-release niacin had higher success rates and lower estimated direct-medical costs than simvastatin. Simvastatin had the highest success rate in achieving LDL level <160 mg/dL and HDL e40 mg/dL; however, its estimated direct-medical cost was approximately twice that of lovastatin/extended-release niacin (665 US dollars versus 333 US dollars). CONCLUSION: For the LDL goals <130 mg/dL and <100 mg/dL (and HDL e40 mg/dL) required of the majority of U.S. residents, lovastatin/extended-release niacin was both more successful and less costly than simvastatin.     

2型糖尿病合并冠心病患者冠状动脉狭窄相关因素分析

目的探讨2型糖尿病（T2DM）合并冠心病患者冠状动脉狭窄程度的相关因素。方法选择52例由冠状动脉造影术确诊为冠心病且合并T2DM住院患者（A组）,Gensini评分系统对冠状动脉造影结果进行评分;选择同期住院的48例不合并冠心病的T2DM患者为对照组（B组）。分别检测两组空腹血糖（FPG）、糖化血红蛋白（HbA1c）、总胆固醇（TC）、甘油三酯（TG）、高密度脂蛋白（HDL）、低密度脂蛋白（LDL）、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶（GGT）,比较两组间上述指标的水平,分析冠状动脉狭窄程度（Gensini评分）与各指标间的相关性。结果①A组BMI、FPG、HbA1c、TC、TG、LDL与B组比较,差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．05,P〈0．01）;②Pearson相关分析显示,BMI、FPG、HbA1c、TC、LDL、GGT与Gensini评分呈显著正相关（r=0．802、r=0．660、r=0．614、r=0．508、r=0．347、r=0．808,P〈0．05）,HDL与Gensini评分旱显著负相关（r=-0．371,P〈0．05）;③多元线性回归分析显示,GGT、LDL—C、BMI、FPG是Gensini评分的影响因素（P〈0．05）。结论降低体重、控制血糖、调节血脂是T2DM心血管病变防治措施的重要组成部分。GGT水平升高与心血管疾病及T2DM密切相关,可作为T2DM合并心血管病变的预测指标。