Salvaging of severely ruptured living-related renal allograft secondary to acute antibody mediated rejection

INTRODUCTION

Spontaneous renal allograft rupture (RAR) is a serious and potentially life-threatening complication of kidney transplantation. Debate on the management of RAR has focused on graft nephrectomy versus salvaging in cases where: the allograft rupture site is surgically manageable; the bleeding can be controlled; and/or leaving the renal allograft in situ does not compromise patient survival.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 45-year-old, living-related, female, kidney allograft recipient experienced RAR on the fourth day post transplantation. Surgical exploration showed 12 cm laceration along the convex border of the graft. Histologically the graft demonstrated mild acute kidney injury and linear deposition of C4d along the cortical peritubular capillaries; morphological features for violent humoral or cellular rejection were not identified. The graft was surgically salvaged with excellent clinical and biochemical improvement.

DISCUSSION

Observations arising from this case are: (1) RAR caused by rejection is still encountered in clinical practice despite effective immunosuppressive management; (2) the severity of the histopathological features of rejection does not necessarily correlate with the extent of graft rupture; and (3) salvaging the graft should be attempted whenever possible as current immunosuppression and advances in surgical techniques may have an impact on long-term graft function and survival, differing from those previously published.

CONCLUSION

With modern immunosuppression therapy and proven surgical procedures, the efficacy of salvaged renal grafts and graft survival rates may improve substantially.     

Renal allograft rupture caused by acute tubular necrosis

Renal allograft rupture is a rare but potentially lethal complication of kidney transplantation. A renal allograft recipient receiving quadruple immunosuppressive therapy developed a spontaneous allograft rupture 13 days after kidney transplantation. Warm ischaemia time during the transplant was 80 minutes. The ruptured kidney graft could not be salvaged because of the patient's haemodynamic instability. The histopathological examination showed interstitial oedema with severe acute tubular necrosis with no signs of acute rejection. The most common causes of renal graft rupture are acute rejection and vein thrombosis, while acute tubular necrosis may only rarely be responsible for this complication. Renal graft rupture may be the result of interstitial damage attributed both to the prolonged warm ischaemia time during the transplant and to post-transplant acute tubular necrosis in the absence of graft rejection. In those patients whose haemodynamic status cannot be stabilized by appropriate aggressive haemodynamic support therapy, graft nephrectomy should be considered the only definitive treatment.     

Long-term survival of kidney allografts in dogs after withdrawal of immunosuppression with ciclosporin and azathioprine

We have examined the immunosuppressive effects of combined azathioprine (Aza) and ciclosporin (CS) in two groups of mongrel dogs receiving kidney allografts. In group 1, Aza and CS were given together daily after transplantation and in group 2 twice the dose of each drug was given separately on alternate days. Doses were halved in each group at successive 84-day intervals and all immunosuppression was stopped on day 336. Thus the same total amounts of Aza and CS were given to all recipients in both groups. Up to day-60 the incidence of rejection in each group was similar, thereafter recipients in group 1 were more susceptible to fatal infection and marrow hypoplasia. This accounted for the difference in long-term survival between the two groups (1/14 in group 1, 5/12 in group 2 at day 420). Subsequently, two long-term survivors in group 2 died, 1 on day 452 from chronic rejection and the other on day 529 from gastroenteritis with a histologically normal allograft kidney. An in vitro analysis of the alloreactive repertoire of two healthy recipients in group 2, bearing each other's kidneys for more than 2.5 years and more than 500 days without immunosuppression, showed a profound donor-specific defect which could account for their operationally tolerant state.     

Piceatannol in combination with low doses of cyclosporine A prolongs kidney allograft survival in a stringent rat transplantation model

BACKGROUND: The discovery of new immunosuppressive agents has enhanced short-term graft survival. However, current immunosuppressants often induce toxicities that limit their clinical use. Thus, there is a need for new immunosuppressants for use in clinical transplantation. Piceatannol blocks Syk and ZAP-70, tyrosine kinases involved in immune cell activation. We examined whether piceatannol prolongs kidney allograft survival in the stringent ACI-to-Lewis rat model. METHODS: Kidney recipients were divided into four groups. Group 1 (n=8) received piceatannol 30 mg/kg per day intravenously and cyclosporine A (CsA) 2 mg/kg per day intramuscularly from day -3 to day 7 after transplantation. At day 8, piceatannol was reduced to 10 mg/kg per day and the combined treatment continued until day 60. Group 2 (n=9) received 2 mg/kg per day CsA alone from day -3 to day 60. Group 3 (n=4) received piceatannol alone as in group 1. Group 4 (n=2) received only the vehicle dimethyl sulfoxide from day -3 to day 60. Graft rejection was defined as either a serum creatinine level more than 2 mg/dL or animal death. RESULTS: Group 1 animals survived for at least 115 days (n=8, P<0.05), with several animals maintaining their grafts for more than 200 days. In contrast, 8 of 9 animals in group 2 rejected their grafts within 10 days of transplantation; one animal survived for 71 days. Excellent graft function was maintained in group 1 animals despite withdrawal of immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: These results are the first to show that piceatannol, when combined with subtherapeutic dosages of CsA, prevents graft rejection, suggesting that targeting Syk and Zap could be useful for preventing graft rejection.     

Prevention of renal allograft rejection in primates by blocking the B7/CD28 pathway.

BACKGROUND: There is accumulating evidence that blockade of the costimulatory pathways offers a valid approach for immune suppression after solid organ transplantation. In this study, the efficacy of anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) to prevent renal allograft rejection was tested in non-human primates. METHODS: Rhesus monkeys were transplanted with a partly major histocompatibility complex-matched kidney on day 0. Anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 mAbs were administered intravenously daily for 14 days starting at day - 1. CsA was given intramuscularly for 35 days starting just after transplantation. The kidney function was monitored by determining serum creatinine levels. RESULTS: The combination of anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 mAbs completely abrogated the mixed lymphocyte reaction. Untreated rhesus monkeys rejected the kidney allograft in 5-7 days. Treatment with anti-CD80 plus anti-CD86 mAbs resulted in a significantly prolonged graft survival of 28+ 7 days (P=0.025). There were no clinical signs of side effects or rejection during treatment. Kidney graft rejection started after the antibody therapy was stopped. The anti-mouse antibody response was delayed from day 10 to 30 after the first injection. No difference in graft survival was observed between animals treated with CsA alone or in combination with anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 mAbs. However, treatment with anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 mAbs reduced development of vascular rejection. CONCLUSIONS: In combination, anti-CD80 and antiCD86 mAbs abrogate T-cell proliferation in vitro, delay the anti-mouse antibody response in vivo, and prevent graft rejection and development of graft vascular disease in a preclinical vascularized transplant model in non-human primates.     

Ten-year follow-up in patients with combined heart and kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Combined heart and kidney transplantation has been documented, although data regarding immunosuppression, rejection episodes, and graft or patient survival have not been detailed. We evaluated our experience and more than 10-year outcome with patients selected for combined heart and kidney transplantation. METHODS: Eight patients aged 29 to 59 years were selected for combined heart and kidney transplantation. The indications were end-stage heart disease and underlying renal pathology, or secondary renal insufficiency, or renal failure. Six patients were dialysis dependent before transplantation. There were 7 simultaneous procedures and 1 staged procedure. The heart was transplanted first in all cases. All patients were maintained after transplantation on azathioprine (2 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)) and whole-blood monoclonal cyclosporine levels at greater than 200 microg/L; prednisone was not decreased to less than 10 mg/d. RESULTS: Seven (87.5%) patients have survived a mean duration of 100.4 months (range, 51-144 months), and each allograft has continued to function. The only death was due to pulmonary emboli and was not related to allograft rejection or failure. Only 4 cardiac and 4 kidney allograft rejections have occurred. Five patients have been free of kidney rejection, 1 patient has been rejection free for more than 8 years, and no patient has had simultaneous rejection. CONCLUSIONS: In select patients, combined heart and kidney transplantation can provide long-term graft function and patient survival. The low rates of rejection support our current approach to immunosuppression. Our experience indicates that end-stage failure of either heart or kidney does not necessarily preclude dual-organ transplantation.     

肾移植术后早期无尿或少尿的诊治(附66例报告)

目的:探讨肾移植术后早期无尿或少尿的原因及诊治方法.方法:回顾性分析66例肾移植术后早期无尿或少尿患者的发生情况.并分别应用以FK506或CsA为主的免疫抑制剂(FK506/CA+MMF+Pred)等综合治疗方案.结果:66例肾移植术后早期无尿或少尿的主要原因是急性肾小管坏死(77.27%),其次是急性排斥反应(10.61%),其中有2例移植肾原发无功能和移植肾破裂、肾动脉栓塞各1例术后切除移植肾.FK506组的34例移植肾功能在术后5～35天内均恢复正常,CsA组有1例因急性排斥反应合并严重肺部感染而死亡,24例移植肾功能在术后7～48天内均恢复正常,3例血肌酐在142～215 μmol/L之间.结论:肾移植术后早期出现无尿或少尿后应及时分析原因,并给予相应的综合治疗.FK506+MMF+Pred的三联免疫治疗有助于移植肾功能的早期恢复.     

Spontaneous kidney allograft rupture

Spontaneous renal allograft rupture is one of the most dangerous complications of kidney transplantation, which can result in graft loss. This condition needs immediate surgical intervention. Conservative management has dismal results. Its prevalence varies from 0.3% to 3%. Rupture occurs in first few weeks after transplantation. Predisposing factors for graft rupture are acute rejection, acute tubular necrosis, and renal vein thrombosis. There are growing reports about successful results of repairing these ruptured kidneys. In this study, we reviewed the medical records of 1682 patients who received kidney allografts from living donors from 1986 through 2003. There were six (0.35%) cases of renal allograft rupture. All were preceded by acute graft rejection. They were treated with antirejection medications. In first three cases, the kidney allografts were removed because the procedure of choice in this situation is graft nephrectomy; but in three next cases we repaired the ruptured grafts with good results in two of them. In conclusion, the procedure of choice for kidney allograft rupture is graft repair.     

Early biological and immune response to semi-identical liver or kidney allograft in miniature swine

In inbred miniature swine, semi-identical liver allograft recipients survive up to 3 months without immunosuppression, whereas similarly mismatched kidney allografts are uniformly rejected within 2 weeks. The early biological and immunological events were assessed in this unique model. SLA(d/d) pigs (MGH, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA) received liver or kidney allograft from heterozygous SLA(c/d) miniature swine. Survival, graft function, histology, intragraft cytokines, peripheral lymphocyte and platelet count, plasma cortisol level and cellular/humoral anti-donor immune response were assessed. Kidney allografts were uniformly rejected within 2 weeks, whereas liver allografts survived for up to 87 days. After both liver and kidney transplantation, the peripheral lymphocyte count decreased during the first week concomitantly to a significant elevation of plasma cortisol level. Early decrease of peripheral platelet count was observed after liver but not renal transplantation. Up-regulation of transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-beta1) and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) was observed during the first postoperative week in semi-identical liver allografts and IFN-gamma as well as IL-10 in kidney allografts. In liver recipients, labelled autologous lymphocytes accumulated in the liver graft and native spleen, whereas after renal allograft, lymphocytes accumulated in the native spleen and liver but never in the kidney allograft. Specific cellular anti-donor unresponsiveness was observed from the first post-transplant day in both liver and kidney recipients, while the humoral anti-donor response remained intact. In semi-identical liver allograft, recipient rejection is milder and slower than in similarly matched kidney allograft. The intragraft up-regulation of TGF-beta1 in semi-identical liver allograft might be one mediator to explain the modulation of rejection after liver transplant. The rapid, nonspecific accumulation of recipient lymphocytes in the liver allograft but not in kidney allograft might also play a role in the different survival time in this model.     

Incidence of graft rejection in small bowel transplanted pigs after immunosuppression withdrawal

As intestinal grafts require heavy immunosuppression, there are no reports of immunosuppression withdrawal after clinical small bowel transplantation. In this large-animal study, we investigated the occurrence of graft rejection in intestinal-transplanted pigs after withdrawal. Large-White unrelated piglets were transplanted and divided in three groups: group 1 (n = 5), intestinal transplantation (ITx) with no immunosuppression; group 2 (n = 7), Itx and 60 days of treatment with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil; group 3 (n = 5), Itx and donor bone marrow infusion (DBMi) and 60 days of treatment with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Follow-up time after withdrawal was 120 days. Group 1 pigs died of graft acute cellular rejection (ACR) after a median of 11 days. In group 2, two pigs died of ACR-related infection and another two of ACR within 90 days. The remaining three animals (43%) were sacrificed at day 180, and their grafts showed no signs of ACR. In group 3, two pigs died of ACR-related infection and one of graft versus host disease within 80 days; at day 180 the two surviving animals showed signs of chronic rejection in the allograft. This study demonstrates that total withdrawal after ITx is followed by sudden and lethal ACR (or ACR-related infection) in more than 50% of the recipients. When a tolerance-inducing strategy as DBMi is applied, lethal graft versus host disease may also occur. In group 3, the intestinal allograft, to which the recipients were partially tolerant, developed chronic rejection that was probably associated with a decline with time of donor-leukocytes chimerism, as recently demonstrated in rats.     

Improved results using OKT3 as induction immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients with delayed graft function

Delayed graft function remains a major problem in cadaveric renal allograft transplantation. We have used 2 different immunosuppressive induction regimens in patients with delayed graft function. The first regimen, used in 40 patients from January 1985 to December 1986, consisted of CsA (8 mg/kg/day, orally within 48 hr of cadaveric renal transplantation regardless of graft function), azathioprine (1.5-2.5 mg/kg/day), and steroids (methylprednisolone 375 mg on day 0, then prednisone tapered to 30 mg/day by day 10 with slow tapering to 7.5-10 mg/day over the first 6 months after transplantation). A second regimen, used from January 1987 to March 1989, employed the same doses of azathioprine and steroids; however, OKT3 (5 mg i.v./day for 7-21 days) was administered in the 34 patients who had delayed graft function. CsA was withheld until ATN resolved. The use of OKT3 as induction immunosuppression in patients with ATN led to a significant increase in 1-year graft survival (80% vs. 55%) while markedly decreasing the incidence of rejection episodes (44% vs. 82%) and the duration of nonfunction (9.4 vs. 14.9 days). There were 5 CMV infections in patients treated with OKT3. Antibodies to OKT3 developed in only 1 of 34 patients treated with OKT3. Five of 7 patients who received a second course of OKT3 successfully reversed the rejection episode. Patient survival (89%) was the same in the 2 groups. The benefit of OKT3 on long-term graft survival appears to stem from elimination of early rejection episodes that may be difficult to diagnose in a poorly functioning allograft. We conclude that OKT3 induction provides superior results over CsA induction at doses given in renal allograft recipients with delayed graft function without a significant increase in morbidity or mortality and permits the reuse of OKT3 for treatment of rejection in most cases.     

Attenuation of acute rejection in a rat liver transplantation model by a liver-targeted dextran prodrug of methylprednisolone

BACKGROUND: The use of methylprednisolone (MP) and other corticosteroids for the treatment of acute liver allograft rejection is associated with severe toxicities in nontarget tissues. Therefore, selective delivery of MP to the liver may improve its efficacy and alleviate its side effects. We investigated the effects of a novel liver-targeted dextran prodrug of MP (DMP) in an orthotopic rat liver transplantation (OLT) model. METHODS: The model consisted of a high responder rejection strain combination (Dark Agouti donors and Lewis recipients). Liver recipients were intravenously administered saline or a single subtherapeutic dose of MP (5 mg/kg) as the parent drug (MP) or its prodrug (DMP). Different groups were then monitored for graft survival or euthanized 5 or 9 days posttransplantation. Plasma chemistry, including alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin, allograft histology, and survival duration were determined. RESULTS: Untreated recipients exhibited elevated plasma levels of liver injury markers, progressive portal and venous inflammation and cellular infiltration in liver allografts, and a mean graft survival time (MST) of 10.5 days. MP treatment did not alter any of these parameters. In contrast, a single dose of DMP resulted in a decrease in plasma levels of liver injury markers, a decrease in histological grade of rejection on day 5, and a substantial increase in MST (27.5 days). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate attenuation of acute rejection following local (allograft) immunosuppression with a single subtherapeutic dose of MP delivered as a liver-targeted prodrug. Dextran prodrugs may be useful for selective delivery of immunosuppressants to the liver following liver transplantation.     

Role of CXCR3 and CCR5 in allograft rejection

Chemokines are known to participate in allograft rejection by mediating leukocyte trafficking. Despite redundancy in chemokine family, several chemokine-chemokine receptor interactions have proven critical in alloimmune responses. We sought to determine the effect of combined blockade of CXCR3 and CCR5, two critical chemokine receptors, in acute rejection. METHODS: Heterotopic heart transplantation was performed using BALB/c to B6/129 mice deficient in CCR5. Following transplantation these mice were treated with goat anti-CXCR3 serum every other day. In the control group, BALB/c hearts were transplanted in wild type B6/129 recipients and treated with goat serum alone. No immunosuppression was given to either group. Recipient mice were then assessed daily for allograft function by abdominal palpation, and graft survival was confirmed by laparotomy. RESULTS: The donor hearts in the control group were rejected at 6 +/- 1 days posttransplantation. Combined blockade of CXCR3 and CCR5 prolonged allograft survival versus control; all allografts survived to 24 days. In addition, there was a decrease in graft infiltrating CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes in the experimental group at 24 days. CONCLUSION: Combined CXCR3 and CCR5 blockade is effective in prolonging allograft survival in a fully MHC mismatched murine model. Combined chemokine blockade holds promise in control of acute rejection in organ transplantation.     

Experimental study on vascularized bone allografts for reconstruction of massive bone defects

To study the healing mechanism of vascularized bone allografts under short-term as well as long-term immunosuppression with cyclosporin A, experimental vascularized intercalary bone allograft transplantation was carried out between inbred rats using the tibiofibula graft model. Bone scintigram and radiographs were used as an indicator for early detection of rejection after transplantation and bone union. In vascularized bone allografts under long-term immunosuppression with cyclosporin A, early bone union and continuous incorporation were similar to that observed in vascularized bone autograft transplantation. When administration of cyclosporin A was discontinued before completion of bone union, the graft was rejected and bone union was delayed. Apparent swelling on the operated limb associated with a decrease in bone scintigram uptake suggested the occurrence of rejection of the allograft. Vascularized bone allograft transplantation is useful for reconstruction of massive bone defects only if immunosuppressants are used and maintained at least until bone union is obtained. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Stable kidney function in the second decade after kidney transplantation while on cyclosporine-based immunosuppression

BACKGROUND: Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have been the mainstay of immunosuppressive protocols in kidney transplantation over the past 20 years. However, in some recipients, the adverse effects of CNIs contribute to chronic allograft nephropathy and death with function--the two leading causes of late graft loss. Other recipients maintain stable graft function. METHODS: We studied the impact of continuing CNI-based immunosuppression in the second decade after kidney transplantation. From 1984 through 1996, a total of 1,263 patients underwent a primary kidney transplant at the University of Minnesota and received cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Antibody induction was used only in deceased donor recipients. RESULTS: The actuarial 20-year patient survival rate was 38%; graft survival, 30%; and death-censored graft survival, 60%. The annual mean serum creatinine level for recipients whose grafts survived > or =1 year remained stable, although recipients with a history of > or =1 acute rejection episode had a higher serum creatinine level vs. recipients who were rejection-free. The annual mean calculated creatinine clearance was also stable over time. In addition, for recipients who were acute rejection-free, chronic allograft nephropathy/chronic rejection was only responsible for 9% of graft losses. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that some kidney transplant recipients tolerate long-term CNI-based immunosuppression with stable creatinine levels. Identifying certain recipients' predisposition to CNI toxicity and individualizing immunosuppressive therapy may be important in order to improve long-term kidney function, while simultaneously preserving low short-term acute rejection rates.     

Patient and renal allograft survival in the late posttransplant period.

Finding the proper balance between too much and not enough immunosuppression is just as important in the late posttransplant period as it is during the first year after transplantation. In general, too much immunosuppression leads to an increase in patient mortality, whereas inadequate immunosuppression can lead to an inordinately high rate of allograft failure (Fig 5). In the late posttransplant period, patient and allograft survival are both critically dependent on the degree of immunosuppression and on the long-term side effects of the agents used to achieve this immunosuppression. Adequate immunosuppression is important in treating and preventing the acute allograft rejection episodes that are common during the first year after transplantation (Fig 6). Some data suggest that the severity of early acute rejection episodes may influence the development of chronic rejection, the most common cause of graft failure in the late posttransplant period. Otherwise, the role of immunosuppression in treating and preventing chronic rejection is unclear. The discontinuation of immunosuppression by noncompliant patients is a major cause of late graft failure. Whether the nephrotoxicity of CsA will also result in graft failure in the very late posttransplant period is still unknown. The agents used to achieve immunosuppression, along with decreased graft function and proteinuria, contribute to hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and hyperglycemia. These and other risk factors have a negative impact on both graft and patient survival. Thus, immunosuppression is directly, or indirectly linked to most of the common causes of death and graft failure after renal transplantation. Although potent new immunosuppression protocols have increased the rate of short-term patient and allograft survival after renal transplantation, future advances in long-term survival after renal transplantation will depend on improvements that are effective in the late posttransplant period. Currently, the best approach to preventing complications in the late posttransplant period is to maintain a vigilant, comprehensive program of on-going medical care. The minimal amount of immunosuppression required to prevent allograft rejection should be used, while adhering to the principle that it is better to lose the graft than to lose the patient.     

alpha4 integrin in islet allograft rejection.

BACKGROUND: Adhesion molecules are involved in multiple steps of the continuum of allograft rejection. We studied the effects of blockade of the interactions between alpha4 integrin and its ligands, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and fibronectin, on allograft survival. METHODS: Streptozotocin-induced diabetic CBA (H-2k) mice received islet transplants from BALB/c (H-2d) donors. Recipient mice were treated with antibodies against alpha4 integrin (PS/2), VCAM-1 (MK 2.7), and a peptide corresponding to the binding site of alpha4 integrin on fibronectin (connecting segment 1 peptide, CS1-peptide). Graft function was measured by daily tail vein blood glucose levels, with rejection defined as the return of hyperglycemia. Graft-bearing kidneys were removed for immunohistochemical analysis. RESULTS: Treatment with anti-alpha4 integrin antibody, anti-VCAM-1 antibody, or with CS1-peptide led to long-term survival of islet allografts. Recipients with long-surviving islet grafts did not show tolerance, in that they rejected a second donor-type islet allograft. Although both anti-alpha4 integrin antibody and CS1-peptide completely abolished cellular infiltration of the islet graft 7 days after transplantation, anti-VCAM-1-treated recipients showed a dense peri-islet infiltrate of activated, alpha4 integrin+, cytotoxic T cells. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that alpha4 integrin is critically important to allograft rejection. Anti-VCAM-1 antibody appears to prevent rejection without qualitatively affecting either T cell activation or migration to the graft. Conversely, anti-alpha4 integrin antibody and CS1-peptide may prevent islet allograft rejection by altering either T cell activation or lymphocyte trafficking. Blocking interactions between alpha4 integrin and its ligands may provide novel forms of immunosuppression.     

Successful third kidney transplantation with intensive immunosuppression in a highly sensitized recipient

HLA sensitization associated with previous kidney transplantation is a major drawback to retransplantation. Recently we successfully performed a third graft using intensive immunosuppression for a highly sensitized recipient. The patient was a 31-year-old man who had previously undergone a living donor graft from his father at our institute in 1999. His kidney graft function had deteriorated due to chronic allograft nephropathy, returning to hemodialysis therapy in 2005. He received a second graft from a deceased donor in another country on August 14, 2006. It rejected on postoperative day 3 possibly due to acute accelerated rejection. He was offered a third kidney from his brother. Panel-reactive antibody (PRA) tested before the third procedure revealed positive class I (88%) and class II (96%) PRAs. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was started 3 weeks before the third transplantation, and preoperative plasmapheresis performed thrice. He underwent the living donor graft on March 9, 2007. Immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, MMF, methylprednisolone, and basiliximab. Immediately afterward there was a sudden decrease in allograft blood flow and urine output, implying hyperacute rejection. Following treatment with plasmapheresis and a single dose of rituximab (200 mg), the kidney allograft function recovered, although the PRA at 3 weeks was still positive. Six months posttransplantation, he is well with a creatinine of 0.9 mg/dL. Our protocol may reduce the risk for graft loss in a highly sensitized transplant recipient.     

Surgical repair of spontaneous renal allograft rupture: a new procedure

Background: The purpose of the present paper is to introduce a new surgical procedure using the external oblique aponeurosis (EOA) for repair of spontaneous renal allograft rupture. Methods: Thirty‐eight cases with spontaneous renal allograft rupture were encountered in 1000 consecutive kidney transplants between April 1991 and August 2000. Thirty‐three cases underwent surgical exploration with two grafts undergoing nephrectomy, while a further 31 were repaired using the new surgical procedure. The external oblique aponeurosis (EOA) from the incision was trimmed into 1 cm × 1 cm square pieces. A 2/0 Dexon suture was placed through each piece of the EOA, then through the parenchyma of the kidney perpendicular to the rupture. Each suture was then placed through another piece of EOA and tied. Results: Two repaired grafts were removed on day 7 and day 10, one due to graft re‐rupture and another with ischaemia secondary to irreversible acute rejection. The graft function of 29 cases had recovered completely at 30 days following surgical repair with one graft improving rapidly. Thirteen grafts were diagnosed as undergoing mild to moderate acute rejection, whereas a further 20 cases were considered to have acute tubular necrosis on histopathology. The allograft survival rate at 1 year and 5 years post grafting was 86% and 64%, respectively. No patients died from postoperative complications following repair using this procedure. Conclusions: Spontaneous renal allograft rupture is a relatively common post‐transplant complication secondary to either acute tubular necrosis or acute rejection. This new surgical procedure is proposed as a reliable and practical method of repair following graft rupture. Preservation of graft function and viability following rupture appears achievable both in the medium and long‐term.     

Treatment of Simultaneous Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Acute Cellular Rejection With Alemtuzumab in Kidney Transplantation: A Case Report

This is a case report of a living related donor kidney transplantation using basiliximab induction and maintenance immunosuppression with cyclosporine, mycophenolate sodium, and steroid. On the second posttransplant day, the patient developed acute antibody-mediated rejection, which was treated with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Five days later, the graft had still not responded to the treatment. Another biopsy revealed additional acute cellular rejection (Banff IIA). As alemtuzumab can rapidly deplete T and B lymphocytes, monocytes, and natural killer cells, the patient was treated with alemtuzumab (30 mg subcutaneously) together with methylprednisolone (500 mg) and two more plasmaphereses. The kidney graft responded within 48 hours, producing more than 4 L of urine per day. The total lymphocyte decreased from 530/μL to 50/μL remaining in the 50 to 220/μL range. The patient received valgancyclovir and cotrimoxazole as infection prophylaxis. The kidney graft responded well to the rescue treatment and the patient was discharged with a serum creatinine of 1.1 mg/mL and has been uneventfully followed in the outpatient clinic for 8 months. Today, with the potent, effective, and selective immunosuppressive regimens, the rate and severity of acute cellular rejection in kidney transplantation has decreased in most centers. However, the rate of acute antibody-mediated rejection has increased to levels greater than those of acute cellular rejection in many centers. Acute antibody-mediated rejection is more difficult and expensive to treat successfully. The treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection included plasmapheresis and IVIG. Herein we have reported a case of kidney transplantation simultaneously developing acute antibody-mediated and acute cellular rejection; the patient was successfully treated with alemtuzumab.