Replacement of oral proton pump inhibitors with intravenous pantoprazole to effectively control gastric acid hypersecretion in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

OBJECTIVES: In patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) or other conditions requiring oral doses of proton pump inhibitors, it frequently becomes necessary to use parenterally administered gastric acid inhibitors. However, i.v. histamine-2 receptor antagonists are not effective at usual doses and lose their effectiveness because of tachyphlaxis. With the approval in the United States of i.v. pantoprazole, a substituted benzimidazole available in i.v. formulation, it will become possible to acutely manage gastric acid secretion in the acute care setting of a hospital. This study was developed to monitor the safety and establish the efficacy of i.v. pantoprazole as an alternative to oral proton pump inhibitors for the control of gastric acid hypersecretion in patients with ZES. METHODS: The efficacy of replacing oral PPI therapy with i.v. pantoprazole was evaluated in 14 ZES patients. After study enrollment, patients taking their current doses of oral PPI (omeprazole or lansoprazole) were switched to pantoprazole i.v. for 6 days during an 8-day inpatient period in the clinical research center. Effective control was defined as an acid output (AO) of < 10 mEq/h (< 5 mEq/h in patients with prior gastric acid-reducing surgery). RESULTS: The mean age of the 14 patients enrolled in the study was 52.4 yr (range = 38-67). Mean basal AO was 0.55 +/- 0.32 mEq/h and mean fasting gastrin was 1089 pg/ml (range = 36-3720). Four patients were also diagnosed with the multiple endocrine neoplasia type I syndrome, nine were male, and two had previously undergone acid-reducing surgery. Before study enrollment, gastric acid hypersecretion was controlled in nine of 14 patients with omeprazole (20-200 mg daily) and five of 14 with lansoprazole (30-210 mg daily). In the oral phase of the study all patients had adequate control of gastric acid secretion, with a mean AO of 0.55 +/- 0.32 mEq/h (mean +/- SEM). Thereafter, 80 mg of i.v. pantoprazole was administered b.i.d. for 7 days by a brief (15 min) infusion and the dose was titrated upward to a predetermined maximum of 240 mg/24 h to control AO. A dose of 80 mg b.i.d. of i.v. pantoprazole controlled AO in 13 of 14 of the patients (93%) for the duration of the study (p > 0.05 compared to baseline values for all timepoints). One sporadic ZES patient (oral control value = 0.65 mEq/h on 100 mg of omeprazole b.i.d. p.o.) was not controlled with 80 mg of i.v. pantoprazole b.i.d. and dosage was titrated upward to 120 mg b.i.d. after day 2. CONCLUSIONS: There were no serious adverse events observed. Intravenous pantoprazole provides gastric acid secretory control that is equivalent to the acid suppression observed with oral proton pump inhibitors. Most ZES patients (93%) maintained effective control of AO previously established with oral PPIs when switched to 80 mg of i.v. pantoprazole b.i.d.; however, for difficult-to-control patients, doses > 80 mg b.i.d. may be required.     

Intravenous pantoprazole rapidly controls gastric acid hypersecretion in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Parenteral control of gastric acid hypersecretion in conditions such as Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) or idiopathic gastric acid hypersecretion is necessary perioperatively or when oral medications cannot be taken for other reasons (e.g., during chemotherapy, acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, or in intensive care unit settings). METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 15-minute infusions of the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole (80-120 mg every 8-12 hours) in controlling acid output for up to 7 days. Effective control was defined as acid output >10 milliequivalents per hour (mEq/h) (<5 mEq/h in patients with prior acid-reducing surgery) for 24 hours. RESULTS: The 21 patients enrolled had a mean age of 51.9 years (range, 29-75) and a mean disease duration of 8.1 years (range, <0.5-21); 13 were male, 7 had multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type I, 4 had undergone acid-reducing surgery, 2 had received chemotherapy, and 13 had undergone gastrinoma resections without cure. Basal acid output (mean +/- SD) was 40.2 +/- 27.9 mEq/h (range, 11.2-117.9). In all patients, acid output was controlled within the first hour (mean onset of effective control, 41 minutes) after an initial 80-mg intravenous pantoprazole dose. Pantoprazole, 80 mg every 12 hours, was effective in 17 of 21 patients (81%) for up to 7 days. Four patients required upward dose titration, 2 required 120 mg pantoprazole every 12 hours, and 2 required 80 mg every 8 hours. At study end, acid output remained controlled for 6 hours beyond the next expected dose in 71% of patients (n = 15); mean acid output increased to 4.0 mEq/h (range, 0-9.7). No serious or unexpected adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous pantoprazole, 160-240 mg/day administered in divided doses by 15-minute infusion, rapidly and effectively controlled acid output within 1 hour and maintained control for up to 7 days in all ZES patients.     

Effect of 7-day therapy with different doses of the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole on the intragastric pH in healthy human subjects.

BACKGROUND: Systematic, randomized, and controlled studies on the effect of low to high doses of the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole on intragastric acidity and plasma gastrin levels have not previously been performed. METHODS: We investigated the effect of 7-day therapy with different doses of lansoprazole (15 mg once or twice daily, 30 mg once or twice daily, and 15 mg three times daily) on intragastric acidity and meal-stimulated daytime plasma gastrin levels in 12 healthy Helicobacter pylori-negative human subjects in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-way crossover study. On days 1, 2, and 7 of the study 24-h intragastric pH-metry and 12-h integrated daytime plasma gastrin determinations were done. RESULTS: Lansoprazole in a dose regimen of 1 x 30 mg/day, 3 x 15 mg/daily, and 2 x 30 mg/day significantly (P < 0.05) increased the intragastric 24-h median pH on days 1, 2, and 7 of therapy as compared with placebo. Lansoprazole in doses of 1 x 15 mg/day and 2 x 15 mg/day significantly increased the intragastric 24-h median pH on days 2 and 7 but not on day 1 of therapy. Doses of 3 x 15 mg and 2 x 30 mg lansoprazole daily significantly increased the intragastric 24-h median pH on days 2 and 7 of treatment as compared with 1 x 30 mg lansoprazole daily. Except for 1 x 15 mg lansoprazole on day 1 of therapy, all given dose regimens of lansoprazole (15-60 mg/day) significantly (P < 0.05) stimulated the 12-h integrated meal-stimulated daytime plasma gastrin response (pM x min) on days 1, 2, and 7 of therapy as compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: A dose of 1 x 30 mg/day is nearly as potent as higher dose regimens of lansoprazole. Thus it most likely is the optimum dose for therapy of gastric and duodenal peptic lesions. A dose of 1 x 15 mg lansoprazole daily is a potent inhibitor of gastric acid output and could be a therapeutic dose for prevention of peptic lesions (that is, reflux oesophagitis or ulcers).     

Gastric acid control with esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole: a five-way crossover study

OBJECTIVES: Proton pump inhibitors owe their clinical efficacy to their ability to suppress gastric acid production. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare intragastric pH following standard doses of esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, comparative five-way crossover study evaluated the 24-h intragastric pH profile of oral esomeprazole 40 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg, omeprazole 20 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg, and rabeprazole 20 mg once daily in 34 Helicobacter pylori-negative patients aged 18-60 yr with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Patients were randomly assigned to one of five treatment sequences and study drug was taken on 5 consecutive mornings 30 minutes prior to a standardized breakfast. A washout period of at least 10 days separated each treatment phase. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients provided evaluable data for all five comparators. The mean number of hours of evaluable pH data was > or =23.75 hours. On day 5, intragastric pH was maintained above 4.0 for a mean of 14.0 h with esomeprazole, 12.1 h with rabeprazole, 11.8 h with omeprazole, 11.5 h with lansoprazole, and 10.1 h with pantoprazole (p < or = 0.001 for differences between esomeprazole and all other comparators). Esomeprazole also provided a significantly higher percentage of patients with an intragastric pH greater than 4.0 for more than 12 h relative to the other proton pump inhibitors (p < 0.05). The frequency of adverse events was similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole at the standard dose of 40 mg once daily provided more effective control of gastric acid at steady state than standard doses of lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.     

Maintenance oral pantoprazole therapy is effective for patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and idiopathic hypersecretion

OBJECTIVE: Maintenance proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is effective for gastric acid hypersecretory states, although data with pantoprazole are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long term p.o. pantoprazole in individuals with hypersecretion. METHODS: All subjects had Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or idiopathic hypersecretion. Baseline acid output was measured in the presence of prior maintenance antisecretory therapy before pantoprazole exposure. The starting dose was 40 mg b.i.d. in most cases, and the dose was adjusted to document control within the first 2 wk of therapy. The maximal allowable dose was 240 mg daily. Acid output was measured on day 28 and then quarterly from month 3. The primary efficacy endpoint was documented control of acid secretion at 6 months, i.e., acid output in the last 1 h before the next dose of therapy of <10 mEq/h (<5 mEq/h in subjects with prior acid-reducing surgery). RESULTS: A total of 26 subjects had Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (six with multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 1) and nine had idiopathic hypersecretion. Pre-enrollment therapy included omeprazole in 27 subjects and lansoprazole in eight, and 82.4% of subjects were controlled on their prior regimens. With upward dose titration, acid output was controlled in all subjects by day 10 and in all but two (6%) at the 6-month time point. Median acid secretion on therapy at 6 months was <2 mEq/h (mean 2.2 mEq/h; range 0-10.5 mEq/h) at a dose of 40 mg b.i.d. for 24 subjects, 80 mg b.i.d. for seven subjects, and 120 mg b.i.d. for two subjects. During the course of the study, five subjects required doses of 240 mg daily. Pantoprazole was generally well tolerated. No cases of anterior optic ischemic neuropathy occurred. Five subjects died during follow-up, all because of events unrelated to the study drug. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance p.o. pantoprazole therapy at a dose of 80-240 mg/day in divided doses was both effective and generally well tolerated for patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and idiopathic hypersecretion.     

Oral pantoprazole for acid suppression in the treatment of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with gastric acid hypersecretion due to gastrinoma, usually recognized as Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES), was radically changed 10 years ago by the use of proton pump inhibitors. Surgical treatment now concentrates on tumour excision, and in the majority of patients, gastrectomy is no longer required to prevent complications of acid hypersecretion that can be managed pharmacologically. AIMS: To verify the ability of pantoprazole to control gastric acid hypersecretion and the clinical effects of acid hypersecretion in seven patients with documented ZES. METHODS: Pantoprazole was administered at an initial dose of 80 mg daily for seven days before basal acid output (BAO) was measured at 08:00, ie, 1 h before the next dose of pantoprazole was normally ingested. A lower (40 mg) or higher (120 mg or more) dose of pantoprazole was then used to keep the BAO in the therapeutic range (between 0.1 and 10 mmol/h) and to control clinical symptoms such as acid-related pain or diarrhea. RESULTS: BAO and clinical symptoms were controlled with pantoprazole 40 mg daily in one patient, 80 mg daily in two patients, 120 mg daily in three patients and 160 mg daily in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Pantoprazole was able to control acid hypersecretion in ZES patients when administered in doses between 40 and 160 mg daily. An initial dose of 120 mg given before further titration of the drug regimen appears to be a reasonable therapeutic strategy.     

Comparison of p.o. or i.v. proton pump inhibitors on 72-h intragastric pH in bleeding peptic ulcer

Background and Aims:  After successful endoscopic hemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcer, addition of proton pump inhibitors reduce the rate of recurrent bleeding by maintaining intragastric pH at neutral level. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of various proton pump inhibitors given through different routes on intragastric pH over 72 h after endoscopic hemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcer.
Methods:  Ninety consecutive patients who had successful endoscopic therapy of bleeding peptic ulcer underwent 72-h continuous ambulatory intragastric pH study, were randomly assigned to receive p.o. omeprazole 80 mg bolus followed by 40 mg every 12 h for 72 h or i.v. 80 mg omeprazole followed by infusion 8 mg/h for 72 h. Oral pantoprazole 80 mg bolus followed by 80 mg every 12 h for 72 h or i.v. 80 mg pantoprazole followed by infusion of 8 mg/h for 72 h. Oral rabeprazole 80 mg bolus followed by 40 mg every 12 h for 72 h or i.v. 80 mg rabeprazole followed by infusion 8 mg/h for 72 h. Five patients received no treatment after successful endoscopic therapy and underwent 72-h pH study.
Results:  Mean 72-h intragastric pH for p.o. omeprazole was 6.56 versus 6.93 for omeprazole infusion ( P  = 0.48). Mean 72-h intragastric pH for p.o. pantoprazole was 6.34 versus 6.32 for pantoprazole infusion ( P  = 0.62). Mean 72-h intragastric pH for rabeprazole p.o. was 6.11 versus 6.18 rabeprazole i.v. ( P  = 0.55). Mean 72-h pH for the no proton pump inhibitor group was 2.04.
Conclusion:  There was no significant difference among various proton pump inhibitors given through different routes on raising intragastric pH above 6 for 72 h after successful endoscopic hemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcer.     

Rebound nocturnal hypersecretion after four weeks treatment with an H2 receptor antagonist.

Daytime intragastric pH, fasting and meal stimulated serum gastrin and nocturnal acid output were studied in eight male duodenal ulcer patients before, during and two days after completing nizatidine 300 mg nocte (20:00 h) for four weeks. Median nocturnal acid output (mmol/10 h) decreased during treatment to 11.6 (range 0.4-26.7) compared with pretreatment value of 39.4 (9.8-91.2); median acid inhibition 77% (p less than 0.01) which was strongest between 24:00 and 04:00 h. Two days after discontinuing treatment, nocturnal acid output increased to 74.1 (11-181). Compared with the pretreatment value this represents median rebound hypersecretion of 77% (p less than 0.05), caused by increased H+ concentration and volume of secretion. Overall median daytime intragastric pH (09:00-21:00 h) was unchanged on the final day of treatment and two days after completing therapy, compared with the pretreatment values. Fasting serum gastrin measured between 09:30 and 10:00 h and the integrated gastrin response to an OXO breakfast taken out at 10:00 h were also similar during and after treatment, compared with pretreatment values. The rebound nocturnal hypersecretion may be relevant to the high ulcer relapse rates after stopping H2 receptor antagonists.     

Potential uses of intravenous proton pump inhibitors to control gastric acid secretion

Proton pump inhibitors are the most effective agents for suppressing gastric acidity and are the preferred therapy for many acid-related conditions. While proton pump inhibitors have been accessible in intravenous formulations in several European countries, they have been available only as oral drugs in the United States. In the near future, the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole is likely to become available in an intravenous formulation for American patients. Potential uses for intravenous proton pump inhibitors include treatment of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and peptic ulcers complicated by bleeding or gastric outlet obstruction, as well as prevention of stress ulcers and acid-induced lung injury. These intravenous proton pump inhibitors are also likely to be beneficial to patients undergoing long-term maintenance with oral proton pump inhibitors who cannot take oral therapy for a period of time. Intravenous pantoprazole is especially distinguished in its lack of clinically relevant drug interactions, and it requires no dosage adjustment for patients with renal insufficiency or with mild to moderate hepatic dysfunction. Both omeprazole and pantoprazole are well tolerated in both oral and intravenous forms. Although further studies are needed to define their roles clearly, the availability of intravenous formulations of proton pump inhibitors will certainly assist with the treatment of gastric acid-related disorders.     

Effect of long-term, continuous versus alternate-day omeprazole therapy on serum gastrin in patients treated for reflux esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors have been proven to have a major role in the management of peptic diseases, especially the long-term control of reflux esophagitis. The potent inhibitory effect of omeprazole on gastric acid secretion is frequently associated with hypergastrinemia, and gastrin and its intermediates have been reported to promote gastrointestinal cellular functions and cell growth. Experimental data suggest that gastrin may affect the proliferation of colon cells and some other cancer cells. However, so far the direct role of gastrin in tumorigenesis is unclear. Although most clinical studies on long-term treatment with omeprazole or other proton pump inhibitors do not report serious adverse effects, the issue of prolonged hypergastrinemia and tissue growth is unsettled, and many clinicians are reluctant to recommend long-term use of omeprazole or of other proton pump inhibitors. STUDY: We examined the effect of long-term omeprazole treatment on serum gastrin levels in patients with reflux esophagitis when given either 20 mg daily (group 1) or on alternate days (group 2). During the follow-up period, clinical remission was monitored and maintained in all patients in group 1 and in the majority of patients in group 2. RESULTS: The mean serum gastrin level was significantly elevated in group 1 (mean +/- SE, 159 +/- 23.6 pg/mL; range, 45-620 pg/mL; n = 31) as compared with the alternate-day treatment group (group 2) (66 +/- 4.8 pg/mL; range, 37-115 pg/mL; n = 21) (p < 0.005). In controls, serum gastrin levels showed similar values to those found in group 2 (54 +/- 4.3 pg/mL; range, 27-94 pg/mL; n = 20). Fourteen patients (45%) in group 1 had serum gastric ranging from 140 to 620 pg/mL, and 8 (25%) had a 6-fold or greater increase in serum gastrin. The follow-up treatment period ranged between 3 and 60 months (mean +/- SE, 16.1 +/- 2.1 months) for group 1 and 3-36 months (9.7 +/- 1.4 months) for group 2. Upon multivariate adjustment for age and duration of treatment, a significantly lower mean serum gastrin level was observed in the alternate-day group as compared with the daily treated group. CONCLUSION: Alternate-day, long-term treatment with omeprazole may be adequate to maintain remission in patients with reflux esophagitis. This regimen can assure serum gastrin levels within the normal range, thus reducing the potential risk of prolonged, sustained hypergastrinemia and profound hypochlorhydria.     

Effect of intravenous application of esomeprazole 40 mg versus pantoprazole 40 mg on 24-hour intragastric pH in healthy adults

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that therapy with proton pump inhibitors reduces recurrence of bleeding following initial endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. AIM: This study compared the effects of esomeprazole 40 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg on intragastric acid control. Both substances were administered intravenously as 15-min infusion and as bolus injection. METHODS: Healthy men and women volunteers were enrolled in this single-center, open, randomized, three-way crossover study. After administration of esomeprazole 40 mg and pantoprazole 40 mg intravenously as 15-min infusion, and pantoprazole 40 mg intravenously as bolus injection, continuous 24-h intragastric pH monitoring was carried out. RESULTS: pH data were available for 21 Helicobacter pylori-negative and seven H. pylori-positive volunteers. In H. pylori-negative volunteers, esomeprazole 40 mg intravenously resulted in 11.8 h with an intragastric pH>4 compared with 5.6 h for pantoprazole 40 mg intravenously as infusion (P<0.0001), and 7.2 h for pantoprazole 40 mg intravenously as bolus injection (P<0.001). During the first 6 h of administration, the corresponding values were 3.4, 1.1 (P<0.000001), and 2.1 h (P<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In H. pylori-negative patients, a single dose of esomeprazole 40 mg intravenously provides an intragastric acid control that is faster and more pronounced than administration of pantoprazole 40 mg intravenously.     

Helicobacter pylori and hypergastrinaemia during proton pump inhibitor therapy.

The rise in serum gastrin and pepsinogen I after 5 days' treatment with the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole (40 mg/day) was examined in eight duodenal ulcer patients with Helicobacter pylori infection and compared with eight in whom it had been eradicated. Before treatment, the post-prandial serum gastrin concentrations were higher in the H. pylori-positive than -eradicated patients (p less than 0.05). The median rise in pre-prandial serum gastrin concentrations on treatment was similar in the H. pylori-positive (41%) and -eradicated patients (45%). The rise in post-prandial serum gastrin was also similar in the H. pylori-positive (81%) and -eradicated patients (69%), resulting in significantly higher gastrin concentrations during treatment in the former. The median rise in serum pepsinogen I on treatment was greater in the H. pylori-positive (114%) than in the -eradicated patients (8%), resulting in significantly higher concentrations during treatment in the former. These observations indicate that eradication of H. pylori may be a means of moderating the hypergastrinaemia caused by acid-inhibitory therapy. They also indicate that H. pylori-related hypergastrinaemia is not due to an increase of the antral surface pH by the bacterium's urease activity.     

Oral buffered esomeprazole is superior to i.v. pantoprazole for rapid rise of intragastric pH: A wireless pH metry analysis

Background and Aims:  A pH of more than 6 is required for clot stability and hemostasis. Intravenous proton pump inhibitors have a rapid onset of action compared to oral and have been preferred for management of non-variceal bleeding. Intravenous pantoprazole has been used extensively. Buffered esomeprazole (BE) is an oral preparation consisting of an inner core of non-enteric-coated esomeprazole with a shell of sodium bicarbonate. The buffer protects against acid degradation of esomeprazole in addition to immediate antacid action. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of BE for raising and maintaining an intragastric pH of more than 6 in comparison to i.v. pantoprazole in equivalent dosing.
Methods:  A randomized two-way cross-over study was conducted. Ten healthy volunteers were randomized to twice daily BE 40 mg or pantoprazole 40 mg i.v. bolus. Intragastric pH was measured with a wireless pH radiotelemetry capsule (Bravo, Medtronic). A 2-week washout period was given between doses.
Results:  BE achieved a steady pH of more than 6 in a median time of 2 min (range 1–5 min) after the first dose. The mean % time that intragastric pH was more than 6.0 for BE was 96%, and 90% of the 24-h period compared to pantoprazole (47% and 18%), P  = 0.000. A median pH (interquartile range) for the BE group was 6.2 (6.175–6.2) which was higher than i.v. pantoprazole 4.60 (4.5–5.0) ( P  = 0.005).
Conclusion:  BE achieves and maintains a pH of more than 6 within minutes of administration. It was significantly superior to i.v. pantoprazole in equivalent dosing. This finding could have implications in the management of non-variceal bleed where a rapid and sustained pH of more than 6 is desirable.     

Pantoprazole therapy in the long-term management of severe acid peptic disease Clinical efficacy, safety, serum gastrin, gastric histology, and endocrine cell studies

OBJECTIVE: Pantoprazole is the third proton pump inhibitor to become available. When this study was started, there were few data on its long-term use. Our aim was to investigate this aspect and, because powerful inhibitors of acid secretion can cause hypergastrinemia and, in experimental animals, enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia, we also monitored serum gastrin and endocrine cell histology. METHODS: One hundred fifty patients refractory to H2-receptor antagonists, running an aggressive course or with complications, were entered into a 5-yr treatment program. We performed serial endoscopy, checked for adverse events, and laboratory values. We also monitored serum gastrin, gastric endocrine cell histology, and antral and corpus gastritis. RESULTS: This report presents results from up to 3 yr of treatment. Cumulative healing on 40-80 mg of pantoprazole was 82% at 4 wk and 92% by 12 wk. Most patients became asymptomatic within 4 wk. Remission on maintenance treatment with 40 mg (n = 111) was 85% at 12 months and 78% at 24 months. Treatment was safe; only four patients had adverse events definitely related to pantoprazole. Elevations in gastrin were modest and there were no significant changes in gastric endocrine cells. The number of enterochromaffin-like cells tended to decrease. CONCLUSION: Pantoprazole is effective, safe, and does not seem to be associated with large increases in serum gastrin or alterations in gastric endocrine cells.     

Stability of gastric secretory inhibition during 6-month treatment with omeprazole in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE: A trend toward relapse of reflux symptoms and esophagitis during long-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors has been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the existence of tachyphylaxia to the effect of proton pump inhibitors on gastric acidity and gastroesophageal reflux over time. METHODS: A total of 23 patients with reflux esophagitis underwent 24-h intragastric and intraesophageal pH-metry after 7, 90, and 180 days of continued dosing with 20 mg of omeprazole once daily before breakfast. RESULTS: The total median percentages of time gastric pH <4 (interquartile range) were 49% (35-70%), 60% (36-76%), and 42% (26-66%) after 7, 90, and 180 days (p = 0.14). Percentages of time gastric pH <3 were 41%, 54%, and 34%, respectively (p = 0.19). The median percentages of total time esophageal pH <4 were 1.1%, 2.5%, and 1.1%, respectively (p = 0.70). Healing of esophagitis was achieved in 84% of the patients after 6 months. Heartburn improved in six, worsened in three, and was unchanged in 10 patients (p = 0.16). There was no statistical significant relationship between change in esophageal acid exposure and change in severity of heartburn. CONCLUSIONS: A dose of 20 mg of omeprazole once daily consistently controlled patients' symptoms and kept gastric acidity at a stable level over a period of 6 months. There is no evidence of diminution in the effects of 20 mg of omeprazole over time that could indicate the development of tolerance.     

Idiopathic gastric acid hypersecretion

Many patients with acid-peptic disease have idiopathic gastric acid hypersecretion defined as a basal acid output >10.0 meq/hr; however, a significant proportion have basal acid outputs >15.0 meq/hr, which is within the range found in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Although idiopathic gastric acid hypersecretion is more common than Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, it is important that these two disorders be differentiated because of differences in treatment and natural history. In the present study, we compared 124 patients with idiopathic gastric acid hypersecretion and 137 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. There were no significant differences with regard to age at diagnosis, history of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, nausea, vomiting, and family history of duodenal ulcer and other acid-peptic disease. However, significant differences were observed between patients with idiopathic gastric acid hypersecretion and patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome with regard to percentage of males: 77% compared to 64% (P=0.008), mean serum gastrin: 60 pg/ml compared to 3679 pg/ml (normal <100 pg/ml) (P<0.001), mean basal acid output: 15.4 meq/hr compared to 47.0 meq/hr (P<0.001), mean age at onset of symptoms: 33 years compared to 41 years (P<0.001), mean duration of symptoms before diagnosis: 11 years compared to five years (P<0.001), percentage with abdominal pain: 67% compared to 82% (P=0.00004), percentage with diarrhea: 12% compared to 75% (P<0.000001), percentage with pyrosis: 58% compared to 40% (P=0.003), percentage with duodenal ulcer: 53% compared to 74% (P<0.000001), and percentage with esophagitis: 31% compared to 42% (P=0.0004). The differences in clinical features could be attributed to difference in mean basal acid output, and/or differences in levels of basal acid output used for diagnosis of idiopathic gastric acid hypersecretion (basal acid output >10.0 meq/hr) and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (basal acid output >15.0 meq/hr). When 45 patients with idiopathic gastric acid hypersecretion and 39 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome with basal acid outputs 15.1–30.0 meq/hr were compared, the main significant differences were with regard to mean serum gastrin: 69 pg/ml compared to 655 pg/ml (P<0.001), percentage of male gender: 82% compared to 62% (P=0.03), and percentage with diarrhea: 16% compared to 64% (P=0.000005). These results indicate that in general patients with idiopathic gastric acid hypersecretion and patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome often have similar clinical features that can be difficult to distinguish. However, the increased frequency of diarrhea and female gender should lead to a strong suspicion of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, which can be distinguished in almost every case by measurement of serum gastrin.     

Pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion and pharmacokinetics following single and repeated intravenous administration of the gastric H+, K(+)-ATPase-inhibitor pantoprazole (BY1023/SK&F96022) in healthy volunteers

The objective of the study was to investigate the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the gastric H+, K(+)-ATPase inhibitor pantoprazole in man following repeated i.v. dosing. 8 healthy male volunteers aged from 25 to 31 years (median: 29 years), body weight between 72 and 95 kg (median: 82 kg) entered this single-blind two-period cross-over study. Each subject underwent two treatment periods of 5 days each with daily infusion of 15 mg or 30 mg pantoprazole, respectively. A placebo day preceeded the trial. On the placebo day as well as on days 1, 4 and 5 of each treatment period, gastric secretion was stimulated submaximally by a pentagastrin infusion of 0.6 micrograms/h/kg over a period of 4 h, starting one hour before administration of drug or placebo. Repeated once-daily infusion (15 min) of pantoprazole resulted in a rapidly increasing pharmacodynamic effect: as compared to placebo the mean percent inhibition of acid output measured from 1 to 3 h after start of infusion was 22%, 63% and 78% for the 15 mg dose, and 56%, 97% and 99% for the 30 mg dose on days 1, 4 and 5, respectively. The pH also increased in relation to the dose and the duration of treatment. Mean fasting gastrin serum concentrations increased by about 50%, yet remained within the normal range. Only in one subject, one of the individual values was above the upper limit of the normal range.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Long-term efficacy and safety of omeprazole in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: a prospective study

To determine the long-term efficacy, safety, and toxicity of omeprazole, we studied 40 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome given omeprazole for 6-51 mo (median 29). The mean daily dose of omeprazole required to control gastric acid secretion was 82 +/- 31 mg. Thirty-one patients required omeprazole once per day. In 9 patients acid output was not controlled by 120 mg once per day, but was controlled by 60 mg every 12 h. The daily dose of omeprazole correlated with the previous dose of histamine H2-receptor antagonist (r = 0.89, p less than 0.001), basal acid output (r = 0.43, p less than 0.01), and maximal acid output (r = 0.39, p less than 0.02) but not with serum concentration of gastrin (r = -0.32). Increases in the dose of omeprazole were required in 9 patients. Twenty-nine patients had mild peptic symptoms with acid outputs less than 10 mEq/h while taking histamine H2-receptor antagonists. Symptoms resolved completely in 23 patients and partially in 3 when taking omeprazole. Omeprazole prevented mucosal disease in all patients including 17 in whom histamine H2-receptor antagonists had produced only partial resolution despite acid output being less than 10 mEq/h and in those with symptoms during omeprazole therapy. Omeprazole therapy was not associated with any significant side effects, nor with any evidence of hematologic or biochemical toxicity. Serum concentrations of gastrin did not change significantly during therapy. In 6 patients treated with omeprazole for 1 yr there was no change in basal or maximal acid output. In all patients, gastric morphology and histopathology demonstrated no evidence of gastric carcinoid formation. These results demonstrate that with long-term treatment of up to 4 yr, omeprazole is safe, with no evidence of hematologic, biochemical, or gastric toxicity. Furthermore, omeprazole remained effective, with only 23% of patients requiring an increase in dose, and continued to control symptoms in patients who had not been entirely symptom-free despite high doses of histamine H2-receptor antagonists. Omeprazole is now the drug of choice in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.     

Homeostasis of the adult colonic epithelium: a role for morphogens

The rise in serum gastrin and pepsinogen I after 5 days' treatment with the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole (40 mg/day) was examined in eight duodenal ulcer patients with Helicobacter pylori infection and compared with eight in whom it had been eradicated. Before treatment, the post-prandial serum gastrin concentrations were higher in the H. pylori-positive than -eradicated patients (p < 0.05). The median rise in pre-prandial serum gastrin concentrations on treatment was similar in the H. pylori-positive (41%) and -eradicated patients (45%). The rise in post-prandial serum gastrin was also similar in the H. py/on'-positive (81%) and -eradicated patients (69%), resulting in significantly higher gastrin concentrations during treatment in the former. The median rise in serum pepsinogen I on treatment was greater in the H. pylori-positive (114%) than in the -eradicated patients (8%), resulting in significantly higher concentrations during treatment in the former. These observations indicate that eradication of H. pylori may be a means of moderating the hypergastrinaemia caused by acid-inhibitory therapy. They also indicate that H. pylori-related hypergastrinaemia is not due to an increase of the antral surface pH by the bacterium's urease activity.     

Effects on 24-hour intragastric pH: a comparison of lansoprazole administered nasogastrically in apple juice and pantoprazole administered intravenously

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 24-h intragastric pH effects of lansoprazole, 30 mg administered nasogastrically, with pantoprazole, 40 mg administered i.v. METHODS: Healthy adults were enrolled in an open label, two-way crossover, single-center study. Thirty milligrams of lansoprazole (administered nasogastrically in apple juice) or pantoprazole (i.v.) were administered once daily at 8:00 AM for 5 consecutive days with at least a 2-wk washout period between the regimens. Ambulatory 24-h intragastric pH was monitored at baseline and on days 1 and 5 of each treatment period. Blood specimens were collected on days I and 5 for pharmacokinetic parameter determinations. RESULTS: Thirty-three adults completed both crossover periods, with the exception of one patient with a zero lansoprazole plasma concentration on day 1 of period 2. Lansoprazole, 30 mg per nasogastric tube, produced significantly higher mean 24-h intragastric pH values relative to pantoprazole, 40 mg i.v., on both day 1 (3.05 vs 2.76, p < 0.002) and day 5 (3.65 vs 3.45, p = 0.024). Lansoprazole sustained the intragastric pH above 3 (days 1 and 5), 4, and 5 (day 1) significantly longer relative to pantoprazole. Lansoprazole's time to the maximum observed concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the 24-h time interval increased significantly from day I to day 5 (1.7 h vs 2.0 h and 1865 ng x h/ml vs 2091 ng x h/ml, respectively), and a significant increase in half-life relative to day 1 (0.96 h) was observed on day 5 (1.03 h) during pantoprazole treatment. CONCLUSION: Lansoprazole, 30 mg administered nasogastrically, effectively controls intragastric pH and is an alternative to i.v. pantoprazole in patients who are unable to swallow solid dosage formulations.