Carcinogenesis studies with benzoyl peroxide (Panoxyl gel 5%)

Several groups of hairless mice were given UV radiation with and without pretreatment with 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA), 5% benzoyl peroxide in a gel (Panoxyl), and gel alone, in various combinations, with appropriate control groups included, in order to see whether benzoyl peroxide, which is known to enhance chemical skin carcinogenesis after a single, small dose of DMBA, also enhances UV carcinogenesis. The mice were observed for skin tumors, and all skin lesions were histologically investigated. The percentage of tumor-bearing animals with time is called the tumor rate, the total number of tumors occurring is called the tumor yield. Continual treatment with 5% benzoyl peroxide in gel twice a week, with or without a short pretreatment period of UV radiation resulted in only 2 skin carcinomas, which is remarkable, but not significant. Both Panoxyl and gel alone enhanced tumorigenicity significantly in animals pretreated with a single dose of 51.2 micrograms DMBA. There was no difference between the enhancement caused by Panoxyl and the gel as regards the tumor rate, but when measured as final tumor yield, Panoxyl was slightly more tumor-enhancing than gel alone. However, both Panoxyl and gel protected significantly against UV tumorigenesis (all tumors). There was no difference between the protective effect of the 2 types of treatment. Neither Panoxyl nor gel alone influenced significantly UV skin carcinogenesis (malignant tumors). It is concluded that under these experimental conditions both Panoxyl and gel alone tend to protect against the tumorigenicity and do not enhance the carcinogenicity of UV radiation in hairless mice, whereas both gel and Panoxyl enhance chemical carcinogenesis. The carcinogenic mechanisms may be different for UV and chemical carcinogenesis, respectively.     

A comparison of the effectiveness of topical tetracycline, benzoyl-peroxide gel and oral oxytetracycline in the treatment of acne

A proprietary topical tetracycline preparation (Topicycline) was compared with an alcohol-based 5% benzoyl-peroxide gel and with oral oxytetracycline (250 mg twice daily) using a randomized group-comparative double-blind study in 69 patients with mild to moderate acne. Facial acne grades improved significantly in all three treatment groups over the 12-week study period but chest acne grades did not change significantly and only oxytetracycline produced a significant improvement in back grade. All three treatment groups produced a significant reduction in facial inflamed and non-inflamed lesions apart from oxytetracycline which failed to produce a significant reduction in inflamed lesions. However, there were no overall significant differences between the three treatment groups either in improvement of acne grade or in reduction of inflamed and non-inflamed lesions. We conclude that topical tetracycline is as effective as either 5% benzoyl-peroxide gel or 250 mg oxytetracycline twice daily in the treatment of mild to moderate acne.     

An Evaluation,Using Computerized Image Analysis,of Antimicrobial Efficacy of an Automatic Hand Washing Machine with Ultrasonic Wave Spraying

We studied the antimicrobial efficacy of hand washing with a quick-dry hand washing machine [TE-KIREIKI]® employing ultrasonic wave spraying and its incidental alcohol-based product [AROKULIN-E]®. The subjects of this study were 10 males who had been instructed not to use any antimicrobial agent for the previous 2 weeks or any hand soap for the previous 5 hours. They pressed their palms on agar before and after washing their hands. After 48-hour incubation at 37°C, the bacterial colonies grown on the agar were counted using the [ASPECT]® image processing system. The colony count was expressed as the post-stamp versus pre-stamp percent (%) reduction. Two patterns of hand washing were examined in this study: [A] a 3-second hand wash using an alcohol-based product [AROKULIN-E]® and [B] a 30-second hand wash using a non-medicated detergent soap with running water in addition to hand washing by [A]. The percent (%) reduction after hand washing patterns [A] and [B] were 49.1% and 51.3%. These reduction rates indicated that these patterns did not eradicate bacteria from the hand surface. Therefore, we concluded that this quick-dry hand washing machine employing an ultrasonic wave spraying method combined with an alcohol-based product needs improvement.     

Effects of disinfectants and detergents on skin irritation

We investigated the biological response of regular human skin to alcohol-based disinfectants and detergents in a repetitive test design. Using non-invasive diagnostic tools such as transepidermal water loss, laser-Doppler flowmetry and corneometry, we quantified the irritative effects of a propanol-based hand disinfectant (Sterillium), its propanol mixture (2-propanol 45% w/w and 1-propanol 30% w/w), sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) 0.5% and distilled water. The substances were applied in a 2-D patch test in a repetitive occlusive test design to the back. Additionally, we performed a wash test on the forearms that was supposed to mimic the skin affection in the normal daily routine of health care workers. In this controlled half-side test design, we included the single application of the hand rub, SLS 0.5% and water as well as a tandem application of the same substances. Patch test and wash test showed similar results. The alcohol-based test preparations showed minimal irritation rather comparable to the application of water. However, the detergent SLS produced stronger barrier disruption, erythema and dryness than the alcohol-based preparations. There was no additional irritation at the combined use of SLS and disinfectants. By contrary, there was even a decrease in barrier disruption and erythema induced by the tandem application of SLS followed by alcohol-based disinfection compared with the use of SLS alone. These findings show a less irritant effect of alcohol-based disinfectants on the skin than detergents. Our study shows that there is no summation of irritating effects of a common detergent and propanol and that the combination of washing and disinfection has a rather protective aspect compared with washing alone.     

Study of the Efficacy of Antiseptic Handrub Lotions with Hand Washing Machines

The effectiveness of quick handwashing in regards to four alcohol-based handrub lotions, including two products already on the market and our original lotions 1, 2, with two different kinds of hand washing machines was studied in vivo. We also tried to evaluate the efficacy of the four lotions in vitro. The in vivo testing of each lotion, including ethanol, was evaluated using two hand washing methods, first with and then without a previous soap wash. Computerized image analysis was used to calculate the bacterial count on the hand surface. The results showed that a 3 second application of the original lotion 2 (0.5% chlorhexidine in a 77% ethyl alcohol solution) preceded by a soap wash eradicated 89.3% of the bacteria on the hands; this was the highest reduction rate of all four detergents. AROKULIN-E (67.9% ethyl alcohol solution) without a prior handwashing produced the lowest reduction, 49.1% against hand surface bacteria. These results were compatible with those in vitro. It seems that an alcohol-based solution containing an effective antimicrobial detergent preceded by a soap wash is neccessary to acceptably reduce hand surface bacteria.     

Do atopics tolerate alcohol-based hand rubs? A prospective, controlled, randomized double-blind clinical trial

Alcohol-based hand rubs are used frequently in healthcare settings, but their tolerance among atopic subjects is unknown. The dermal tolerance to five alcohol-based hand rubs was assessed among atopic and non-atopic subjects in a repetitive occlusive patch test. In total, 54 subjects were analysed. One half of the subjects were atopic (modified Erlanger atopy score > or = 8), the other half were non-atopic. Treatments were controlled with water and 2% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS). Treatment sites were assessed by visual inspection (tolerability score 0-4). Skin redness was determined with a chromameter. The overall mean tolerability to all five hand rubs was lower than or identical to the negative control (0.02+/-0.07) and significantly different from the SDS control (0.19+/-0.39). Skin redness was in the same range as for the negative control (0.15+/-0.8) which was significantly lower than the SDS control (1.35+/-1.6). A comparison of the atopic and non-atopic subjects revealed no significant difference. In conclusion, we found that tolerance to the five alcohol-based hand rubs was good among atopic and non-atopic subjects.     

Observer-blind,randomized, intrapatient comparison of a novel 1% coal tar preparation (Exorex) and calcipotriol cream in the treatment of plaque type psoriasis

BACKGROUND: In a recent pilot study a novel, patented fatty acid-based 1% coal tar preparation (Exorex) has been found to be similar in efficacy to calcipotriol in the treatment of psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy, safety and cosmetic acceptability of the new 1% coal tar preparation in comparison with calcipotriol cream in a larger patient cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with chronic plaque type psoriasis were included in this randomized, observer-blind, intrapatient comparison trial. In each patient two comparable target plaques were treated twice daily with 1% coal tar preparation or calcipotriol cream. At the onset of therapy and at weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8, the response to treatment was determined by the psoriasis severity index (PSI) that assesses the degree of erythema, infiltration and scaling of the psoriatic lesions on a five-point scale. In addition, all treatment-related side-effects were recorded and cosmetic acceptability of both treatments was rated every second week by the patients. After complete or near complete clearing the patients were followed up until relapse or for a maximum period of 18 months. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients completed the study. At termination of the trial the mean +/- SD baseline PSI score of 9.2 +/- 1.5 was reduced to 3.0 +/- 2.9 by 1% coal tar preparation and to 2.8 +/- 2.7 by calcipotriol. The mean PSI reduction between baseline and final assessment did not differ significantly between 1% coal tar preparation and calcipotriol (P = 0.77). The mean intraindividual difference in reduction of PSI score between 1% coal tar preparation and calcipotriol was 0.1 score points (95% confidence interval - 0.84 to + 0.63). No difference between either preparation was observed with regard to time until relapse. Itching was caused by 1% coal tar preparation in four patients and by calcipotriol in one patient. Unpleasant odour or staining of the 1% coal tar preparation was reported by six patients, whereas one patient complained about the smell of the calcipotriol cream. CONCLUSIONS: The novel 1% coal tar preparation was found to be comparably as effective as calcipotriol in treating psoriasis. Tolerability and cosmetic acceptability was better for calcipotriol. Taking into consideration that the coal tar preparation is considerably less expensive than calcipotriol this new product appears as a very useful topical medication for chronic plaque type psoriasis.     

Short-term effects of alcohol-based disinfectant and detergent on skin irritation

The most important risk factor for occupational contact dermatitis in hospital personnel is the exposure to irritants such as water, detergents and alcohol-based solutions. This study was undertaken to evaluate the short-term effects of repeated exposure to an alcohol-based disinfectant, to a detergent and to an alcohol-based disinfectant/detergent alternately. The hardening effect in preirritated skin after a 4-week interval was also evaluated. Detergent, disinfectant and disinfectant/detergent alternately were applied daily every 15 min for 6 h for 2 days to the flexor upper arms and forearms of 15 volunteers. A control area was included. After 4 weeks, a sodium lauryl sulfate patch was applied to each area. Irritant reactions were quantified by visual score, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin colour at baseline, D3, D8, D35 and D37. As evaluated by clinical assessment, detergent caused more redness of the skin than both disinfectant applied alone and disinfectant/detergent alternately at D3 and D8, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively. An increased irritant response for detergent as compared to disinfectant alone and disinfectant/detergent was confirmed by TEWL and colour evaluations, P = 0.001 and P = 0.001 and P = 0.006 and P = 0.009, respectively. No hardening effect in preirritated skin was found after a 4-week interval. In conclusion, hand disinfection with alcohol-based disinfectant or alternate use of disinfectant/detergent causes less skin irritation than hand disinfection with a detergent. This study evaluated the short-term effects of disinfectant and detergent exposure only, and more long-term studies are necessary before recommendations can be made.     

Skin tolerance and effectiveness of two hand decontamination procedures in everyday hospital use

BACKGROUND: Hand decontamination is crucial to control nosocomial infections. The utility of hand decontamination is related not only to its antimicrobial effectiveness, but also to its acceptability by hospital staff. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess skin tolerance and antimicrobial effects of two widely accepted hand hygiene measures under in-use conditions. METHODS: Fifty-two nurses were randomly assigned for an 8-day period to either an alcohol-based disinfectant or a hand wash with a non-antiseptic soap. At baseline and at the end of the test period, microbiological hand samples were obtained both before and after a hand hygiene procedure, and skin tolerance was assessed using clinical scores and measurement of transepidermal water loss. RESULTS: Self-assessment of skin condition and grade of skin damage worsened significantly more in the group using soap than in the group using alcoholic disinfectant (P = 0.004 and P = 0.01, respectively). The alcohol-based rinse was significantly more effective than liquid soap in removing transient contaminant micro-organisms (P = 0.016). Twenty of 50 hand washes with non-antiseptic soap apparently resulted in bacterial contamination of the hands. At the end of the study, the total bacterial count increased with the increasing number of hand washes in the soap group (P = 0.003), and with the degree of skin damage (P = 0.005) in the antiseptic group. CONCLUSIONS: In everyday hospital practice, alcohol-based disinfectant is more effective and better tolerated than non-antiseptic soap; soap is at risk of spreading contamination; and skin comfort strongly influences the number and the quality of hand hygiene procedures.     

Skin condition associated with intensive use of alcoholic gels for hand disinfection: a combination of biophysical and sensorial data

Although hand hygiene is an important and inexpensive measure to prevent nosocomial infections in clinical settings, the compliance of healthcare workers remains low. In Europe, alcoholic hand disinfection is first choice, but there exists a limited user acceptability due to estimated adverse effects on skin condition. This study was designed to investigate skin tolerance to alcohol-based disinfecting gels and changes in skin condition depending on humectant concentration, alcohol grades, as well as type of alcohol used. A comparison of 6 alcohol-based gels was made based on a randomized double-blind study under in use conditions for 1 day. Skin condition was evaluated by measuring transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum hydration, apparent skin pH, redness and degree of scaliness. With respect to user acceptability, all gels were sensorially evaluated using a questionnaire. We saw that none of the alcohol-based gels, applied under in use conditions, altered TEWL or caused irritation. All gels hydrated the skin, proportionally to their glycerine content, and decreased skin pH. Elevated ethanol concentrations resulted in increased scaliness. Sensorial assessment revealed less appreciation for isopropanol. From this study, it was concluded that gels containing an elevated glycerine concentration and 70% (v/v) ethanol are preferred.     

A comparison of the Tzanck smear and viral isolation in varicella and herpes zoster

We compared the usefulness of the Tzanck smear to viral culture in patients with varicella and herpes zoster. All 11 patients with early lesions of varicella had a positive Tzanck preparation, while only seven (64%) of 11 had a positive culture. Twelve (80%) of 15 patients with zoster had a positive Tzanck preparation, while only nine (60%) of 15 had a positive culture. The predominance of the Tzanck yield over the culture is probably due to the increased difficulty in isolation of the varicella zoster virus. These results suggest that the Tzanck preparation is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of patients with varicella and zoster and offers a much more immediate answer than does viral culture, which often takes one to two weeks. These results contrast with those of our previous study of the Tzanck preparation and herpes simplex, in which the viral culture was more accurate than the Tzanck preparation.     

Topical alpha-interferon ointment with dimethyl sulfoxide in the treatment of recurrent genital herpes simplex.

The recent in vivo appearance of acyclovir-resistant strains of herpes simplex virus stresses the need for new therapeutic agents to combat this common virus. Topical interferon preparations may help fill this void. In the present study dimethyl sulfoxide was combined with alpha-interferon in an ointment base to increase percutaneous penetration. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with recurrent genital herpes simplex using the topical alpha-interferon preparation had a more rapid cessation of viral shedding when compared to the placebo group (66% culture negative on day 1 vs. 25% of placebo patients; p less than 0.02). In the 90-day post-treatment period, interferon-treated patients had fewer recurrences than their placebo-treated counterparts (1.18 vs. 2.25). This reduction while not statistically significant was encouraging (p less than 0.10).     

Soap or alcohol-based products? The effect of hand hygiene on skin characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

Different strategies for hand skin hygiene have been used to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2. However, frequent hand sanitization has been associated with skin damage. The present study aimed to evaluate hand hygiene habits during the COVID-19 pandemic and the effect of the repetitive use of soap or alcohol-based products on skin characteristics.

Methods

We conducted a survey regards hand hygiene habits acquired during the COVID-19 pandemic. Also, we performed cutometry in a cohort of individuals who cleansed their volar forearms every 30 min, during 4 h, using soap or alcohol-based products.

Results

We received 138 responses from people with medium-high educational level who reported a 2.5-time increase in the frequency of hand cleansing (p < 0.0001) that resulted in skin damage. An in vivo analysis of skin moisture and elasticity was also performed among 19 health workers and students. In general, skin moisture decreased with every cleansing, mainly after 2 h of washing with soap (p < 0.01), while skin elasticity only reduced after 4 h of treatment (p < 0.05). Alcohol-based solution or alcohol-based gel (70% ethanol, both) did not affect skin moisture or elasticity during testing.

Conclusion

It is known that the excessive use of soap or alcohol-based products causes dermatological issues. The present study demonstrates that non-medicated soap significantly affects skin moisture and elasticity, probably because the soap removes the hydrolipidic protective barrier, favoring transepidermal water loss, where the lack of the appropriate stratum corneum hydration also affects skin elasticity, mainly associated with changes in epidermal structure.     

Allergic contact dermatitis from the preservative 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one (1,2-BIT; Proxel®): a case report, its prevalence in those occupationally at risk and in the general dermatological population, and its relationship to allergy to its analogue Kathon® CG

Occupational contact allergy to 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one (1,2-BIT, Proxel) is analysed. This compound is widely used in industry as a preservative in water-based solutions such as pastes, paints and cutting oils. The optimal concentration for patch testing proved to be 0.4 g/l (0.04%) in water. In 4 out of 17 patients (23%) at occupational risk (painters, paper-hangers), contact allergy to 1,2-BIT was found. Of 556 consecutive dermatological patients without clear occupational risk, 10 (1.8%) showed positive patch tests to 1,2-BIT; in 3 patients 1,2-BIT contact allergy was related to domestic paper-hanging. Although the chemical structure of 1,2-BIT shows some analogy with the preservative Kathon CG, true cross-sensitivity was found to be unlikely.     

Results of a randomised, multicentre study comparing a new water-based gel of clindamycin 1% versus clindamycin 1% topical solution in the treatment of acne vulgaris

Several topical formulations of clindamycin phosphate are currently marketed for the treatment of acne vulgaris. This 12 week, multi-centre, investigator-blind, randomised, active and placebo-controlled, parallel group study assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of clindamycin 1% gel once-a-day vs clindamycin 1% solution twice-a-day, and to demonstrate its superiority vs its vehicle alone. A total of 592 subjects were included. After 12 weeks, a 65% reduction in inflammatory lesion count was observed with both active treatments. The gel was superior to its vehicle for total and inflammatory lesion reduction, Global Assessment of Improvement, and Global Severity Grade at final visit (all p < 0.01). No difference was found between the 2 active treatments for any of the evaluated criteria. Local tolerance in each active treatment group was slightly better with clindamycin gel (1.9% of subjects) relative to 3.1% in the topical solution group. In conclusion, the new water-based gel once-a-day formulation of clindamycin 1% is an effective, safe, and convenient alternative to the twice-a-day topical solution formulation in the treatment of acne vulgaris.     

Less skin irritation from alcohol-based disinfectant than from detergent used for hand disinfection

BACKGROUND: The benefit of alcohol-based disinfectant used on normal skin has been debated. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of repeated exposure to an alcohol-based disinfectant, a detergent and an alcohol-based disinfectant/detergent alternately for 10 days, including noninvasive measurements in the evaluation. Skin reactivity in irritated skin after a 4-week interval was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Detergent, disinfectant and alternate disinfectant and detergent were applied twice daily every 10 min for 1 h to the ventral upper arms and forearms of 17 healthy volunteers. A control area was included. After 4 weeks an SLS patch was applied to each area. Irritant reactions were quantified with a visual score recording and measurements of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin colour were performed on days 1, 5, 11, 38 and 40. RESULTS: On day 5 the detergent caused a higher visual score than either disinfectant applied alone or alternate disinfectant and detergent, P < 0.05. On day 11 detergent and alternate disinfectant and detergent caused a higher score than disinfectant, P < 0.05. An increased irritant response for detergent compared with disinfectant alone and alternate disinfectant and detergent was confirmed by TEWL evaluations on days 5 and 11, P < 0.001, while no significant difference was found by colour measurement. After 4 weeks, when evaluated by colour measurement, significantly less response to the SLS patch was found on the disinfectant-treated area compared with the control area and detergent area, and a similar trend was found for TEWL, although it was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Alcohol-based disinfectant caused less visible skin irritation and less skin barrier disruption than the use of detergent. The alternate use of detergent and disinfectant caused less irritation than the use of detergent, and a possible interaction between the two irritants was not indicated. After 4 weeks there was a tendency for decreased skin reactivity in the skin areas which had 4 weeks previously been exposed to disinfectant.     

Prospective randomized study comparing the debriding effect of krill enzymes and a non-enzymatic treatment in venous leg ulcers

The debriding potential of a recently discovered potent enzyme preparation derived from Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) was compared to a routine non-enzymatic treatment in 31 patients with venous leg ulcers. To assure a reliable interpretation of the cleaning effect, computer image analysis was used to measure wound size and the amount of debris day by day. Krill enzyme treatment was significantly (p less than 0.01) better than the non-enzymatic treatment. The necrotic area diminished by 53%, while in the control group no reduction of the necrotic area was observed in 7 days. The median time required to clean the ulcer was 7 days in the krill group and 10 days in the control group. Afterwards the ulcers were grafted with autologous skin biopsies, which yielded similar results in both groups. No side effects were observed. It was concluded that krill enzymes fulfil criteria for effective debridement of venous leg ulcers.     

Comparison of indirubin concentrations in indigo naturalis ointment for psoriasis treatment: a randomized,double‐blind,dosage‐controlled trial

Corticosteroids are commonly used topical (applied to the skin) therapies in psoriasis; although beneficial, there are concerns about their prolonged use and there is a need for effective alternatives. Many herbal remedies have been used topically, although evidence for their benefit is often limited. Indigo naturalis has been used for several years in Chinese traditional medicine; unfortunately, when taken by mouth it can cause gastro‐intestinal side effects or liver damage. Previous studies have shown it may be effective, as a crude ointment or a refined preparation, containing the active ingredient indirubin, which causes less skin staining than the crude preparation. Indirubin has anti‐inflammatory properties and reduces the excessive turnover of cells called keratinocytes in the outermost layer of skin, the epidermis, which is seen in psoriasis. The authors, based in Taiwan, aimed to find the optimal concentration of indirubin in a topical preparation. They recruited 109 adults with psoriasis affecting less than 20% body surface area. The subjects received different concentrations of indirubin (ranging from 10 to 200 μg/g) for an 8 week treatment period, followed by a further 12 week monitoring period. The researchers measured the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) before and after treatment, which is a measurement of how severe a person's psoriasis is. 200 μg/g was the most effective concentration: in this group 56.5% of patients achieved a 75% improvement and 30.4% a 90% improvement in PASI score, with a reduction of itching. The improvement was maintained after discontinuing treatment. No major side effects were observed, although skin irritation occurred in some patients, even on the lowest dose. Clearly this study needs confirmation, but the authors propose that topical indirubin is beneficial in psoriasis, with an efficacy between that of a topical medicine called calcipotriol and the combination of calcipotriol with a potent corticosteroid, but with less toxicity than the latter.     

Topical vitamin B12--a new therapeutic approach in atopic dermatitis-evaluation of efficacy and tolerability in a randomized placebo-controlled multicentre clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Vitamin B(12) is an effective scavenger of nitric oxide (NO). As the experimental application of a NO synthase inhibitor, N omega-nitro-L-arginine, led to a clear decrease in pruritus and erythema in atopic dermatitis, it would be reasonable to assume a comparable effect of vitamin B(12). OBJECTIVES: The efficacy and tolerability of a new vitamin B(12) cream as a possible alternative to current therapies was examined. METHODS: A prospective, randomized and placebo-controlled phase III multicentre trial, involving 49 patients was conducted. For the treatment duration of 8 weeks, each patient applied twice daily (in the morning and evening) the vitamin B(12)-containing active preparation to the affected skin areas of one side of the body and the placebo preparation to the contralateral side according to the randomization scheme. RESULTS: On the body side treated with the vitamin B(12) cream, the modified Six Area Six Sign Atopic Dermatitis score dropped to a significantly greater extent than on the placebo-treated body side (for the investigational drug 55.34 +/- 5.74 SEM, for placebo 28.87 +/- 4.86 SEM, P < 0.001). At the conclusion of the study, the investigator and patients awarded mostly a 'good' or 'very good' rating to the active drug (58% and 59%, respectively) and a 'moderate' or 'poor' rating to the placebo (89% and 87%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Topical vitamin B(12) is a new therapeutic approach in atopic dermatitis. These results document a significant superiority of vitamin B(12) cream in comparison with placebo with regard to the reduction of the extent and severity of atopic dermatitis. Furthermore, the treatment was very well tolerated and involved only very low safety risks for the patients.     

Hand hygiene in the dermatologist's office: to wash or to rub?

Hand hygiene is a central factor in preventing the spread of disease in the dermatologist's office. The role of hand washing and alcohol-based hand rubs is considered with emphasis on compliance, effectiveness, side effects, and cost. Specific recommendations highlight the importance of using alcohol-based hand rubs as an adjunct to traditional hand-washing methods.