Whole-body FDG PET/CT is more accurate than conventional imaging for staging primary breast cancer patients

Purpose

This retrospective study aimed (1) to compare the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body FDG PET/CT for initial breast cancer staging with the accuracy of a conventional, multimodal imaging algorithm, and (2) to assess potential alteration in patient management based on the FDG PET/CT findings.

Methods

Patients with primary breast cancer (106 women, mean age 57?±?13?years) underwent whole-body FDG PET/CT and conventional imaging (X-ray mammography, MR mammography, chest plain radiography, bone scintigraphy and breast, axillary and liver ultrasonography). The diagnostic accuracies of FDG PET/CT and a conventional algorithm were compared. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed in terms of primary tumour detection rate, correct assessment of primary lesion focality, T stage and the detection rates for lymph node and distant metastases. Histopathology, imaging or clinical follow-up served as the standards of reference.

Results

FDG PET/CT was significantly more accurate for detecting axillary lymph node and distant metastases (p?=?0.0125 and p?Conclusion Full-dose, intravenous contrast-enhanced FDG PET/CT was more accurate than conventional imaging for initial breast cancer staging due to the higher detection rate of metastases and synchronous tumours, although the study had several limitations including a retrospective design, a possible selection bias and a relevant false-positive rate for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases. FDG PET/CT resulted in a change of treatment in a substantial proportion of patients.     

Added value of dedicated axillary hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI for improved axillary nodal staging in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients: a feasibility study

Purpose

To investigate the feasibility and potential added value of dedicated axillary 18F-FDG hybrid PET/MRI, compared to standard imaging modalities (i.e. ultrasound [US], MRI and PET/CT), for axillary nodal staging in clinically node-positive breast cancer.

Methods

Twelve patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer underwent axillary US and dedicated axillary hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI. Nine of the 12 patients also underwent whole-body PET/CT. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were measured for the primary breast tumor and the most FDG-avid axillary lymph node. A positive axillary lymph node on dedicated axillary hybrid PET/MRI was defined as a moderate to very intense FDG-avid lymph node. The diagnostic performance of dedicated axillary hybrid PET/MRI was calculated by comparing quantitative and its qualitative measurements to results of axillary US, MRI and PET/CT. The number of suspicious axillary lymph nodes was subdivided as follows: N0 (0 nodes), N1 (1–3 nodes), N2 (4–9 nodes) and N3 (≥ 10 nodes).

Results

According to dedicated axillary hybrid PET/MRI findings, seven patients were diagnosed with N1, four with N2 and one with N3. With regard to mean SUVmax, there was no significant difference in the primary tumor (9.0 [±5.0] vs. 8.6 [±5.7], p = 0.678) or the most FDG-avid axillary lymph node (7.8 [±5.3] vs. 7.7 [±4.3], p = 0.767) between dedicated axillary PET/MRI and PET/CT. Compared to standard imaging modalities, dedicated axillary hybrid PET/MRI resulted in changes in nodal status as follows: 40% compared to US, 75% compared to T2-weighted MRI, 40% compared to contrast-enhanced MRI, and 22% compared to PET/CT.

Conclusions

Adding dedicated axillary 18F-FDG hybrid PET/MRI to diagnostic work-up may improve the diagnostic performance of axillary nodal staging in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients.

     

PET/CT与增强CT检测乳腺癌及其腋淋巴结转移的对照研究

目的探讨^18F-脱氧葡萄糖（FDG）PET／CT显像与螺旋CT增强扫描检测乳腺癌及其腋淋巴结转移的临床价值。方法27例乳腺肿块患者于同日行^18F—FDG PET／CT显像与CT增强扫描。患者俯卧于乳腺专用泡沫垫上接受检查，前者图像由3位核医学科医师采用目测法结合半定量法进行诊断，后者图像由3位影像科医师分析诊断；最后与病理检查结果对照。结果27例患者PET／CT与增强CT均发现31个乳腺肿块，病理检查证实其中21个为乳腺癌，10个为良性病变；发现腋淋巴结91个，共有66个转移（1例有双侧腋淋巴结转移）；PET／CT显像检测乳腺癌原发灶的灵敏度为80．95％，特异性为90％，阳性预测值为94．44％；检测淋巴结转移的灵敏度为89．39％，特异性为88％，阳性预测值为95．16％。增强CT检测乳腺癌原发灶的灵敏度为90．48％，特异性为60％，阳性预测值为82．61％；检测淋巴结转移的灵敏度为86．36％，特异性为52％，阳性预测值为82．61％。^18F—FDG PET／CT和增强CT对腋淋巴结状态的诊断与病理检查结果的列联系数分别为0．64和0．37；两者对乳腺癌及其腋淋巴结转移的诊断特异性差异有显著性（P〈0．05）；对直径〈2cm的病灶，^18F—FDG PET／CT诊断准确性明显高于增强CT（P〈0．05）。结论^18F—FDG PET／CT对诊断乳腺癌及其腋淋巴结转移的特异性均高于增强CT。     

18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation.

Accurate evaluation of primary tumors and cervical lymph node status of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity is important to treatment planning and prognosis prediction. In this prospective study, we evaluated the use of 18F-FDG PET, CT/MRI, and their visual correlation for the identification of primary tumors and cervical nodal metastases of SCC of the oral cavity with histologic correlation. METHODS: One hundred twenty-four patients with pathologically proven diagnoses of oral cavity SCC underwent 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI within 2 wk before surgery. We interpreted 18F-FDG PET, CT/MRI, and visually correlated 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI separately to assess the primary tumors and their regional lymph node status. We recorded lymph node metastases according to the neck level system of imaging-based nodal classification. Histopathologic analysis was used as the gold standard for assessment of the primary tumors and lymph node involvement. We analyzed differences in sensitivity and specificity among the imaging modalities using the McNemar test. The receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve and calculation of the area under the curve were used to evaluate their discriminative power. RESULTS: The accuracy of 18F-FDG PET, CT/MRI, and their visual correlation for the identification of primary tumors was 98.4%, 87.1%, and 99.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET for the identification of nodal metastases on a level-by-level basis was 22.1% higher than that of CT/MRI (74.7% vs. 52.6%, P < 0.001), whereas the specificity of 18F-FDG PET was 1.5% lower than that of CT/MRI (93.0% vs. 94.5%, P = 0.345). The sensitivity and specificity of the visual correlation of 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI were 3.2% and 1.5% higher than those of 18F-FDG PET alone (77.9% vs. 74.7%, P = 0.25; 94.5% vs. 93.0%, P = 0.18, respectively). The area under the curve obtained from the ROC curve showed that 18F-FDG PET was significantly superior to CT/MRI for total nodal detection (0.896 vs. 0.801, P = 0.002), whereas the visual correlation of 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI was modestly superior to 18F-FDG PET alone (0.913 vs. 0.896, P = 0.28). CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET is superior to CT/MRI in the detection of cervical status of oral cavity SCC. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET for the detection of cervical nodal metastasis on a level-by-level basis was significantly higher than that of CT/MRI, whereas their specificities appeared to be similar. Visual correlation of 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI showed a trend of increased diagnostic accuracy over 18F-FDG PET alone but without a statistically significant difference, and its sensitivity was still not high enough to replace pathologic lymph node staging based on neck dissection.     

18F-FDG PET/CT with Contrast Enhancement for Evaluation of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in T1 Breast Cancer

Background

¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography ((PET) safely predicts axillary status in patients with breast cancer, but is not sufficiently accurate in early breast cancer patients. This study analyzed the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) with contrast enhancement in detecting axillary lymph node involvement in T1 breast cancer patients.

Methods

Contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was performed within 20 days of surgery in 143 breast cancer patients with tumors ≤2 cm in size. The patients underwent either axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and histopathology reports were used to provide the definitive diagnosis against which the contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT study results were compared.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in detecting axillary involvement were 70.0%, 92.2%, 88.8%, and 77.8%, respectively, in the entire series of 143 patients, with eight false-positive and 12 false negative results. The false-negative results were associated with the number of metastatic lymph nodes and the rate of FDG uptake.

Conclusion

Contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT cannot replace histologic staging using SLNB in patients with breast cancer, but ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT increases the sensitivity for predicting axillary node metastasis, and allows for a selective approach to either ALND or SLNB, even in patients with T1 breast cancer.     

18F-FDG PET/CT for staging of penile cancer.

The value of PET or PET/CT with (18)F-FDG for the staging of penile cancer has yet to be determined. The objective of this study was to investigate the pattern of (18)F-FDG uptake in the primary malignancy and its metastases and to determine the diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the staging and restaging of penile cancer. METHODS: Thirteen patients (mean +/- SD age, 64 +/- 14.0 y) with suspected penile cancer or suspected recurrent disease were examined with a Gemini PET/CT system (200 MBq of (18)F-FDG). The reference standard was based on histopathologic findings obtained at biopsy or during surgery. RESULTS: Both the primary tumor and regional lymph node metastases exhibited a pattern of (18)F-FDG uptake typical for malignancy. Sensitivity in the detection of primary lesions was 75% (6/8), and specificity was 75% (3/4). On a per-patient basis, sensitivity in the detection of lymph node metastases was 80% (4/5), and specificity was 100% (8/8). On a nodal-group basis, PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 89% (8/9) in the detection of metastases in the superficial inguinal lymph node basins and a sensitivity of 100% (7/7) in the deep inguinal and obturator lymph node basins. The mean +/- SD maximum standardized uptake value for the 8 primary lesions was 5.3 +/- 3.7, and that for the 16 lymph node metastases was 4.6 +/- 2.0. CONCLUSION: According to our results, the main indication for (18)F-FDG PET in the primary staging or follow-up of penile cancer patients may be the prognostically crucial search for lymph node metastases. With the use of a PET/CT unit, the additional information provided by CT may be especially useful for planning surgery. Implementing (18)F-FDG PET and PET/CT in future staging algorithms may lead to a more precise and stage-appropriate therapeutic strategy. Furthermore, invasive procedures with a high morbidity rate, such as general bilateral lymphadenectomy, may be avoided.     

Prospective evaluation of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyclucose positron emission tomography in breast cancer for staging of the axilla related to surgery and immunocytochemistry

The noninvasive staging of axillary lymph nodes for metastases is investigated in patients with breast cancer prior to surgery by positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine- l8-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG). In 124 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, whole-body PET was performed to determine the average differential uptake ratio (DUR) of¹⁸F-FDG in the axillary lymph nodes. Results were correlated with the number of the dissected lymph nodes, size of the primary tumor, tumor type, tumor grade, estrogen and progesterone receptors, DNA ploidy, and the proportion of cells in the synthetic phase of the cell cycle (S-phase). In this prospective study of 124 patients with breast carcinoma, PET correctly categorized all 44 tumor-positive axillary lymph nodes, a sensitivity of 100%. Sixty tumor-negative axillary lymph nodes were negative by PET and 20 tumor-negative axillary lymph nodes were positive by PET. No false-negative PET findings were encountered. A weak correlation was found between DUR and tumor size as well as between DUR and the S-phase of the tumor. In patients with breast carcinoma,¹⁸F-FDG PET can be of value in evaluating axillary lymph nodes for metastatic involvement prior to surgery. It is of particular importance that no false-negative PET findings were encountered, and axillary lymph node dissection might not be necessary in patients without axillary uptake by PET. The DUR of the positive axillary lymph nodes seems to bear a relationship with some of the purported prognostic parameters of the primary tumor.     

The role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in initial staging of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma with an emphasis on M staging

Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is a distinct entity in breast carcinoma with high incidence of distant metastases (M). However, there is scarce data in the literature addressing the role of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) in LABC. This study was performed to assess the sensitivity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in confirming known lymph nodal and M and in identifying new ones in LABC. We performed a retrospective analysis of data of 16 patients with LABC who underwent histopathology, for the diagnosis of LABC and clinical examination, chest X-rays, ultrasound of the abdomen and whole body bone scans. Findings for M obtained by all the above examinations were compared to the (18)F-FDG PET/CT findings that followed. Lymph nodal and distant metastases detected by all other examinations were detected by (18)F-FDG PET/CT in all patients, except subcentimetric metastases in 2 patients in the axilla that were detected in another examination later. Additionally, (18)F-FDG PET/CT identified unknown ipsilateral, supraclavicular, internal mammary metastases and upstaged disease in 3 patients and additional distant metastases were noted in 3/16 patients. In conclusion, our study suggests that more extra axillary lymph nodal and distant metastases can be identified by (18)F-FDG PET/CT as compared to a group of clinical, X-rays, ultrasound and bone scan examinations together.     

The Potential of F-18-FDG PET in Breast Cancer. Detection of Primary Lesions, Axillary Lymph Node Metastases, or Distant Metastases

This retrospective study was done to evaluate the utility of 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (F-18-FDG PET) in identifying primary and recurrent breast cancer and lymph node metastases. One hundred whole-body PET scans of 87 patients were reviewed. PET results obtained with F-18-FDG and an ECAT/EXACT-921 or an ECAT-931 (Siemens/CTI) were based on visual interpretation, or standardized uptake values (SUVs), related to histology and also compared to computerized tomography (CT) and mammography results. The sensitivity for PET in detecting primary (N = 35 studies) and recurrent breast cancer (N = 65 studies) was 96% and 85% with a specificity of 91% and 73%. The sensitivity for lymph node metastases at the time of initial diagnosis was 100% with a specificity of 100%. Quantitative SUV information did not improve the accuracy of F-18-FDG PET in identifying primary breast cancers. The results suggest that whole-body PET is useful in detecting recurrence or metastases, may be useful in detecting lymph node metastases prior to initial axillary lymph node dissection, but is less sensitive in excluding axillary lymph nodes metastases later in the course of the disease.     

Clinical role of (18)F-FDG PET for initial staging of patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer

In extrahepatic bile duct cancer, preoperative evaluation is important because only surgical excision of all detectable tumours is associated with improvement in 5-year survival. However, morphological imaging techniques, including computed tomography (CT), are still insufficient for accurate staging. The purpose of this study was to assess the additional value, in relation to CT, of 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy- D-glucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) for the evaluation of extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Thirty patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer underwent both (18)F-FDG PET and CT for initial staging. The results of the two modalities for evaluation of primary tumours and regional lymph nodes were compared with the final diagnoses based on pathological or clinical findings. The primary tumours were interpreted as malignant on the basis of CT in 24 (80%) of the patients, while (18)F-FDG PET revealed increased (18)F-FDG uptake in 18 (60%) of them. On the other hand, (18)F-FDG PET showed focal accumulation of (18)F-FDG in the bile duct in three of the six patients with equivocal findings on CT. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CT for regional lymph node metastases were 54%, 59% and 57%, while those of (18)F-FDG PET were 38%, 100% and 73%, respectively. The specificity of (18)F-FDG PET for regional lymph node metastases was significantly higher than that of CT ( P<0.01). Of 14 patients with N1 or N2 disease diagnosed by CT, only seven (50%) had a final diagnosis of regional lymph node metastasis. In these 14 patients, (18)F-FDG PET accurately evaluated the N component of the disease in 12 patients (86%). In conclusion, in the initial staging of patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer, (18)F-FDG PET offers additional value in relation to CT in evaluating both the primary tumour and regional lymph nodes.     

Evaluation of head and neck cancer with 18F-FDG PET: a comparison with conventional methods

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis and staging of primary and recurrent malignant head and neck tumours in comparison with conventional imaging methods [including ultrasonography, radiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)], physical examination, panendoscopy and biopsies in clinical routine. A total of 54 patients (13 female, 41 male, age 61.3+/-12 years) were investigated retrospectively. Three groups were formed. In group I, 18F-FDG PET was performed in 15 patients to detect unknown primary cancers. In group II, 24 studies were obtained for preoperative staging of proven head and neck cancer. In group III, 18F-FDG PET was used in 15 patients to monitor tumour recurrence after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. In all patients, imaging was obtained at 70 min after the intravenous administration of 180 MBq 18F-FDG. In 11 of the 15 patients in group I, the primary cancer could be found with 18F-FDG, yielding a detection rate of 73.3%. In 4 of the 15 patients, CT findings were also suggestive of the primary cancer but were nonetheless equivocal. In these patients, 18F-FDG showed increased 18F-FDG uptake by the primary tumour, which was confirmed by histology. One patient had recurrence of breast carcinoma that could not be detected with 18F-FDG PET, but was detected by CT. In three cases, the primary cancer could not be found with any imaging method. Among the 24 patients in group II investigated for staging purposes, 18F-FDG PET detected a total of 13 local and three distant lymph node metastases, whereas the conventional imaging methods detected only nine local and one distant lymph node metastases. The results of 18F-FDG PET led to an upstaging in 5/24 (20.8%) patients. The conventional imaging methods were false positive in 5/24 (20.8%). There was one false positive result using 18F-FDG PET. Among the 15 patients of group III with suspected recurrence after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, 18F-FDG was true positive in 7/15 (46.6%) and true negative in 4/15 (26.6%). The conventional imaging methods were true positive in 5/15 (33.3%) and true negative in 4/15 (26.6%). One false negative (6.6%) and three false positive findings (20%) on 18F-FDG PET were due to inflamed tissue. The conventional imaging methods were false positive in three (20%) and false negative in three cases (20%). It is concluded that in comparison to conventional diagnostic methods, 18F-FDG PET provides additional and clinically relevant information in the detection of primary and metastatic carcinomas as well as in the early detection of recurrent or persistent head and neck cancer after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. 18F-FDG PET should therefore be performed early in clinical routine, usually before CT or MRI.     

Positron emission tomography with 11C-acetate and 18F-FDG in prostate cancer patients

Visualisation of primary prostate cancer, its relapse and its metastases is a clinically relevant problem despite the availability of state-of-the-art methods such as CT, MRI, transrectal ultrasound and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of carbon-11 acetate and (18)F-FDG PET in the detection of prostate cancer and its metastases. Twenty-five patients were investigated during the follow-up of primary prostate cancer, suspected relapse or metastatic disease using (11)C-acetate PET; 15 of these patients were additionally investigated using (18)F-FDG PET. Fourteen patients were receiving anti-androgen treatment at the time of the investigation. Lesions were detected in 20/24 (83%) patients using (11)C-acetate PET and in 10/15 (75%) patients using (18)F-FDG PET. Based on the results of both PET scans, one patient was diagnosed with recurrent lung cancer. Median (18)F-FDG uptake exceeded that of (11)C-acetate in distant metastases (SUV =3.2 vs 2.3). However, in local recurrence and in regional lymph node metastases, (11)C-acetate uptake (median SUVs =2.9 and 3.8, respectively) was higher than that of (18)F-FDG (median SUVs =1.0 and 1.1, respectively). A positive correlation was observed between serum PSA level and both (11)C-acetate uptake and (18)F-FDG uptake. (11)C-acetate seems more useful than (18)F-FDG in the detection of local recurrences and regional lymph node metastases. (18)F-FDG, however, appears to be more accurate in visualising distant metastases. There may be a role for combined (11)C-acetate/(18)F-FDG PET in the follow-up of patients with prostate cancer and persisting or increasing PSA.     

18F-FDG PET/CT在胃癌中的临床应用进展

胃癌是全球范围内最常见的恶性肿瘤之一。18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖（FDG）PET/CT在胃癌中的应用既有优点又有局限性。胃癌原发灶对18F-FDG的摄取与癌症分期、组织学分型和肿瘤大小密切相关。早期胃癌18F-FDG摄取阳性预示着内镜黏膜下剥离术的不可治愈性。进展期胃癌的最大标准化摄取值（SUV_max）在肠型与印戒细胞癌（SRC）或弥漫型胃癌间的差异显著,SRC的SUV_max与患者的总生存时间和无病生存时间呈负相关。18F-FDG PET/CT对区域淋巴结转移的诊断灵敏度较低,但其特异度很高,区域淋巴结对18F-FDG摄取呈阳性是预后不良的指征。18F-FDG PET/CT可检出隐匿的远处转移（7.2%~10.0%）,其中大部分（4.7%~8.8%）使用腹腔镜也不能检出。常规性应用18F-FDG PET/CT并联合腹腔镜检查对明确胃癌分期的意义重大。因此,笔者就18F-FDG PET/CT在胃癌中的临床应用进展进行综述。     

Diagnostic value of full-dose FDG PET/CT for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients

Purpose

The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate FDG PET/CT and CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer (BC) patients and (2) to evaluate FDG PET/CT as a pre-test for the triage to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).

Methods

The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV), and accuracy of FDG PET/CT and CT for axillary lymph node metastases were determined in 61 patients (gold standard: histopathology). According to the equation “NPV = specificity ? (1-prevalence) / [specificity ? (1-prevalence) + (1-sensitivity) ? prevalence]” FDG PET/CT was evaluated as a triage tool for SLNB versus ALND.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of FDG PET/CT was 58, 92, 82, 77 and 79% and of CT 46, 89, 72, 71 and 72%, respectively. Patients with an up to ~60% risk for axillary lymph node metastases appear to be candidates for SLNB provided that the axilla is unremarkable on FDG PET/CT.

Conclusion

FDG PET/CT cannot replace invasive approaches for axillary staging but may extend the indication for SLNB.     

A seldom case of primary urethral malignant melanoma and breast cancer detected by (18)F-FDG PET/CT

In the 1(st )issue of HJNM for 2012 we read with interest a case where 3 different cancers were detected. Synchronous second malignancy can be incidentally detected in routine fluorine-18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( (18)F-FDG PET/CT) imaging in approximately 1% of cancer patients with lungs being the most frequent site. We report the (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan for staging of the primary malignant melanoma of the urethra and for the detection of another malignancy in the breast in the same patient, since primary malignant melanoma of urethra is very seldom. A 65 years old post-menopausal woman presented with increased frequency of micturition, dysuria and a gradually enlarging mass protruding from the external urethral meatus. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) performed from the mass revealed malignant melanoma. On cystourethrescopy examination, a 4x4 cm blackish mass was noted at the external urethral meatus with a satellite nodule in the bladder trigone. Contrast enhanced CT (CeCT) of the pelvis showed soft tissue thickening along the urethra infiltrating urinary bladder neck and vagina. Analysis of (18)F-FDG PET/CeCT was performed to assess the extent of the disease. Intensely (18)F-FDG avid soft tissue mass (SUV(max): 20.1) was noticed along the entire length of the urethra with hypermetabolic right inguinal and left external iliac lymph nodes. In addition to (18)F-FDG uptake in the bladder wall and the vaginal wall, intense (18)F-FDG uptake was also seen in two soft tissue nodules in the right breast and in the axillary lymph nodes suggestive of a second primary in the breast. Cytological diagnosis of intraductal breast carcinoma was made after FNAC from the breast nodule. Urethral melanoma was treated with anterior exenteration and ileal conduit. Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of primary malignant melanoma of urethra infiltrating the urinary bladder and anterior vaginal wall. Postoperative histopathology from the right inguinal and left external iliac lymph nodes revealed metastatic disease. The diagnostic contribution of PET/CT was crucial. Melanotic melanoma cells have a distinctive MRI signal, which may be helpful in diagnosis. In this case whole body MRI could have been of equal value for accurate staging of urethral melanoma, but whole body MRI is a cumbersome procedure and often is not practical. Primary urethral carcinoma is very rare and an annual ageadjusted incidence rate of 4.3 per 106 in males and 1.5 per 106 in females has been reported in USA. Primary malignant melanoma of the urethra is rare, representing less than 1% of all melanomas and 4% of urethral cancers. Furthermore, the incidence of two primary cancers is rare and is reported to be between 0.3% and 4.3%. Primary malignant melanoma of the urethra has a worse prognosis than its cutaneous counterpart, partly due to delayed diagnosis. At the time of diagnosis, urethral melanoma is usually deeply invasive and locally extended to the vagina or vulva or the corpora cavernosa. Inguinal lymph node metastases are present at diagnosis in half of the cases and distant metastases in one third of them. Positron emission tomography demonstrates specificity and accuracy of 94.7% and 73% respectively in detecting lymph nodal metastases. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in detecting metastases in high risk patients were 85%, 96%, 91% while for (18)F-FDG PET/CT with dedicated CT interpretation were 98%, % and 96%, respectively. Recently, the role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in treatment response evaluation of melanoma patients has also been demonstrated. Incidental (18)F-FDG uptake in the breasts is rare, and the lesion may be malignant in up to 57% of the cases. To our knowledge no published literature is available on synchronous breast carcinoma and urethral melanoma. The reason why some patients are more prone to develop multiple cancers remains obscure. One possibility may be of a genetic predisposition linking the two cancers. Research suggests that mutations in CDKN2A, a gene that indicates high risk of developing melanoma, also puts carriers at an up to 3.8 times greater risk of breast cancer. Similarly, mutations in the gene of breast cancer susceptibility, BRCA2, increase carriers' risk of melanoma by as much as 2.58 times. In conclusion, we describe a case of two primary carcinomas: a unique urethral malignant melanoma and a breast carcinoma, detected and staged by (18)F-FDG PET/CT.     

Comparison of FDG PET/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer

Objective

Endometrial cancer is the most frequent cancer occurring in the female genital tract in the Western countries. Because surgical staging is currently the standard, noninvasive techniques that accurately identify lymph node (LN) metastases would be beneficial by reducing costs and complications. The purpose of our study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting LN metastases in the preoperative staging of endometrial cancer.

Methods

Two hundred eighty-seven consecutive patients with endometrial cancer underwent preoperative PET/CT and MRI for staging. The malignancy criteria for LNs were a short diameter of 1 cm or more by MRI and focally increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake by PET/CT. After evaluating PET/CT and MRI separately, morphologic and functional image findings were compared with the histological findings regarding LN metastasis for all patients. PET/CT and MRI images were classified on the basis of histological findings as true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, or false-negative. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated.

Results

Histologic examination revealed LN metastases in 51 patients (17.8 %). The maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of the primary lesions by PET/CT ranged from 1.4 to 37.7, with a mean value of 9.3, whereas those of the metastatic LNs ranged from 2.0 to 22.5 with a mean of 7.3. On a per-patient basis, node staging resulted in sensitivities of 70.0 % with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and 34.0 % with MRI, and specificities of 95.4 % with PET/CT and 95.0 % with MRI. The NPV of PET/CT was 94.3 %, and that of MRI was 87.2 %. On a lesion base analysis, sensitivity of PET/CT was 79.4 % while that of MRI was 51.6 %. In detecting distant metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of PET/CT were 92.9, 98.9, 98.6, 81.3, and 99.6 %, respectively.

Conclusion

Diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT was better than MRI for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in patients with endometrial cancer both by patient basis and lesion basis analyses. Due to high NPV, FDG PET-CT could aid in selecting candidates for lymphadenectomy.

     

18F-FDG PET/CT Findings in a Breast Cancer Patient with Concomitant Tuberculous Axillary Lymphadenitis

Although ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is a sensitive modality for detecting a malignant lesion, increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake is also seen in infected or inflammatory processes. Here, we report the case of a breast cancer patient with concomitant tuberculous axillary lymphadenitis that showed increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake. A 39-year-old woman underwent preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) as a part of the work-up for right breast cancer. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT images showed a malignant lesion in the right breast with moderate ¹⁸F-FDG uptake, and multiple enlarged right axillary lymph nodes with intense ¹⁸F-FDG uptake. Subsequently, the patient underwent right mastectomy and right axillary lymph node dissection. Histopathological examination confirmed breast cancer and tuberculous lymphadenitis, and the patient was treated concomitantly with anti-tuberculous therapy.     

Evaluation of head and neck cancer with 18F-FDG PET: a comparison with conventional methods

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of ¹⁸F-FDG PET in the diagnosis and staging of primary and recurrent malignant head and neck tumours in comparison with conventional imaging methods [including ultrasonography, radiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)], physical examination, panendoscopy and biopsies in clinical routine. A total of 54 patients (13 female, 41 male, age 61.3ᆠ years) were investigated retrospectively. Three groups were formed. In group I, ¹⁸F-FDG PET was performed in 15 patients to detect unknown primary cancers. In group II, 24 studies were obtained for preoperative staging of proven head and neck cancer. In group III, ¹⁸F-FDG PET was used in 15 patients to monitor tumour recurrence after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. In all patients, imaging was obtained at 70 min after the intravenous administration of 180 MBq ¹⁸F-FDG. In 11 of the 15 patients in group I, the primary cancer could be found with ¹⁸F-FDG, yielding a detection rate of 73.3%. In 4 of the 15 patients, CT findings were also suggestive of the primary cancer but were nonetheless equivocal. In these patients, ¹⁸F-FDG showed increased ¹⁸F-FDG uptake by the primary tumour, which was confirmed by histology. One patient had recurrence of breast carcinoma that could not be detected with ¹⁸F-FDG PET, but was detected by CT. In three cases, the primary cancer could not be found with any imaging method. Among the 24 patients in group II investigated for staging purposes, ¹⁸F-FDG PET detected a total of 13 local and three distant lymph node metastases, whereas the conventional imaging methods detected only nine local and one distant lymph node metastases. The results of ¹⁸F-FDG PET led to an upstaging in 5/24 (20.8%) patients. The conventional imaging methods were false positive in 5/24 (20.8%). There was one false positive result using ¹⁸F-FDG PET. Among the 15 patients of group III with suspected recurrence after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, ¹⁸F-FDG was true positive in 7/15 (46.6%) and true negative in 4/15 (26.6%). The conventional imaging methods were true positive in 5/15 (33.3%) and true negative in 4/15 (26.6%). One false negative (6.6%) and three false positive findings (20%) on ¹⁸F-FDG PET were due to inflamed tissue. The conventional imaging methods were false positive in three (20%) and false negative in three cases (20%). It is concluded that in comparison to conventional diagnostic methods, ¹⁸F-FDG PET provides additional and clinically relevant information in the detection of primary and metastatic carcinomas as well as in the early detection of recurrent or persistent head and neck cancer after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. ¹⁸F-FDG PET should therefore be performed early in clinical routine, usually before CT or MRI.     

18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting nodal metastases in patients with oral cancer staged N0 by clinical examination and CT/MRI.

(18)F-FDG PET has a high accuracy in staging head and neck cancer, but its role in patients with clinically and radiographically negative necks (N0) is less clear. In particular, the value of combined PET/CT has not been determined in this group of patients. METHODS: In a prospective study, 31 patients with oral cancer and no evidence of lymph node metastases by clinical examination or CT/MRI underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT before elective neck dissection. PET/CT findings were recorded by neck side (left or right) and lymph node level. PET/CT findings were compared with histopathology of dissected nodes, which was the standard of reference. RESULTS: Elective neck dissections (26 unilateral, 5 bilateral; a total of 36 neck sides), involving 142 nodal levels, were performed. Only 13 of 765 dissected lymph nodes harbored metastases. Histopathology revealed nodal metastases in 9 of 36 neck sides and 9 of 142 nodal levels. PET was TP in 6 nodal levels (6 neck sides), false-negative in 3 levels (3 neck sides), true-negative in 127 levels (23 neck sides), and false-positive in 6 levels (4 neck sides). The 3 false-negative findings occurred in metastases smaller than 3 mm or because of inability to distinguish between primary tumor and adjacent metastasis. TP and false-positive nodes exhibited similar standardized uptakes (4.8 +/- 1.1 vs. 4.2 +/- 1.0; P = not significant). Sensitivity and specificity were 67% and 85% on the basis of neck sides and 67% and 95% on the basis of number of nodal levels, respectively. If a decision regarding the need for neck dissection had been based solely on PET/CT, 3 false-negative necks would have been undertreated, and 4 false-positive necks would have been overtreated. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET/CT can identify lymph node metastases in a segment of patients with oral cancer and N0 neck. A negative test can exclude metastatic deposits with high specificity. Despite reasonably high overall accuracy, however, the clinical application of PET/CT in the N0 neck may be limited by the combination of limited sensitivity for small metastatic deposits and a relatively high number of false-positive findings. The surgical management of the N0 neck should therefore not be based on PET/CT findings alone.     

The impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT on assessment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma at diagnosis

The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of whole-body (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT alters staging and management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) when compared with current staging practice. 52 patients with Stage III-IV NPC without distant metastases on chest X-ray/CT, abdominal ultrasound or bone scan were recruited for the study. Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MRI of the head and neck were performed. The scans were compared for extent of the primary tumour (PT), cervical nodal metastases (CNM) and distant metastases (DM). Any discordance in results was assessed with respect to staging and impact on management. MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans were discordant in 28 (54%) patients. There was discordance in the extent of PT at 28 sites; in all sites, MRI showed more extensive tumour involving the nasopharynx (n = 8), skull base (n = 14), brain (n = 4) and orbit (n = 2). There was also variation among the extent of CNM in four nodes of the retropharyngeal region, with the nodes being positive on MRI. (18)F-FDG PET /CT did not identify any additional distant metastases but did identify a second primary tumour in the colon. The additional use of (18)F-FDG PET/CT did not "up-stage" the overall stage or change management in any patient. In conclusion, there is discordance between MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT, and the additional use of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the current assessment of NPC at diagnosis does not appear to be justified in this cohort of patients.