Redo operations for recurrent aneurysmal disease of the ascending aorta and transverse aortic arch

Sixty-seven operations were performed in 59 patients for aneurysmal disease occurring after previous operations involving the ascending aorta and transverse aortic arch. The initial aortic pathological condition included the following: fusiform aneurysm due to medial degenerative disease in 34 patients, 12 of whom had Marfan's syndrome; aortic dissection in a previously undilated aorta in 23; and aneurysm persisting or occurring after brachiocephalic bypass in 2. One of the latter had an aneurysm because of aortitis. Various operations initially performed did not completely treat the disease, and certain complications occurred spontaneously, including infection and dissection. The residual pathological condition led to the development of aortic insufficiency, aortic dissection, coronary artery insufficiency, and progressive aneurysmal dilatation. These complications were treated by composite valve graft replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta or the transverse aortic arch or both, simple aortic valve replacement, graft replacement of the ascending aorta or arch or both, and suture of false aneurysm with viable tissue wrap. Twenty patients (34%) had an aneurysm of the distal aorta. The entire aorta was replaced in 3, thoracoabdominal segments in 9, and the abdominal aorta in 1. Of the 59 patients, 49 (83%) were early survivors and 40 (68%) were alive on January 1, 1985. Principles of therapy that may have prevented the complications leading to reoperation include aneurysm replacement at the time of aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass; total replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve in patients with Marfan's syndrome; the same procedure or aortic valve replacement and separate graft replacement in patients with non-Marfan's medial degenerative disease; ascending aortic replacement in all patients with dissection combined with valve resuspension, aortic valve replacement, or composite valve graft depending on the involvement of the aortic sinuses and the presence of aortic insufficiency.     

Aortic root replacement after operation for the ascending aorta and/or aortic valve

We reviewed ten cases who underwent aortic root replacement after operation for the ascending aorta and/or aortic valve. As initial operation, aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed in five patients, replacement of the ascending aorta in two, original Bentall operation in two, and entry closure and suspension of the aortic valve in one. At reoperation, three patients were diagnosed as aneurysm of the ascending aorta, two were annulo-aortic ectasia, and one was acute aortic dissection, chronic dissecting aneusym, pseudoaneurysm of the ascending aorta, prosthetic valve endocarditis, and massive aortic regurgitation. Aortic root replacement was performed using mechanical valved composite graft in all cases. One patient who underwent repeat aortic root replacement for prosthetic valve endocarditis was died of septemia and ventricular fibrillation. Five patients had nine complications (two low output syndrome, respiratory failure and cerebral infarction, one gastrointestinal bleeding, septemia and ventricular fibrillation). In conclusion, aortic root replacement after operation for the ascending aorta and/or aortic valve was performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality.     

One advice to the decision of graft size for ascending and total arch graft replacement (in a case of differential diameters in ascending aorta and descending aorta)

We carried out the surgery of thoracic aortic aneurysm in fifty-eight patients from June 1994 to February 1999 (including aortic dissection in twenty-six patients). The mean size of grafts were 28.1 mm in ascending graft replacement, 25.8 mm in both ascending and arch graft replacement and 23.8 mm in descending graft replacement. The grafts for ascending aortic aneurysm were significantly larger than those for descending aortic aneurysm. In two of twenty-six patients undergoing both ascending and arch graft replacement, different size of grafts were used for ascending replacement and for arch replacement with satisfactory results in terms of bleeding from the anastomotic sites. Case 1; A 45-year-female with aortitis syndrome and aortic regurgitation due to annuloaorticectasia and thoracic aortic aneurysm underwent simultaneous aortic root replacement with composite graft (25 mm St. Jude Medical valve and 28 mm Hemashield graft) and total arch replacement (30 mm Hemashield graft with two side branches). Case 2; A 64-year-female was diagnosed as chronic type II dissecting aneurysm combined with acute type I aortic dissection. Ascending aorta was replaced with a 26 mm Hemashield graft, and the aortic arch was replaced with a 24 mm Hemashield graft with three side branches.     

Ascending aortic aneurysms with associated aortic regurgitation

A safe method for replacement of the entire aortic valve, root, and ascending aorta for aortic insufficiency associated with an ascending aortic aneurysm is supported. This method utilizes a composite synthetic graft and valve with direct annular suture and implantation of the coronary arteries in the graft. The advantages of the technique include a shortened operation and freedom from postoperative hemorrhage, paraprosthetic leakage, and recurrent aneurysm formation.     

Surgical repair of dissection of the upper descending thoracic aorta and discrete ascending aortic aneurysm.

This report describes successful staged surgical repair in 2 patients with dissection of the upper descending thoracic aorta (DeBakey type III) with coexisting discrete Marfan's aneurysms of the ascending aorta. Initial repair of the descending aortic dissection was done through a left thoracotomy using a transverse aorta--femoral artery shunt in 1 patient and a left ventricular apex--femoral artery shunt without systemic heparinization in the other. Emphasis is placed on the need for pharmacological reduction of blood pressure during aortic cross-clamping as well as the use of a shunt to prevent dissection of the ascending aortic aneurysm. In both patients, subsequent repair of the ascending aortic aneurysm was accomplished using composite graft replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta. This operation is advised for such patients even in the absence of notable aortic valve incompetence.     

Surgical implication of aortic dissection on long-term outcome in marfan patients

We herein review our 17-year surgical experience for the treatment of ascending aortic aneurysm in patients with Marfan syndrome to clarify the risks of increased mortality and reoperation. The subjects consisted of 15 patients who had all undergone surgery for the aortic root and ascending aorta at Niigata University Hospital between July 1978 and January 1995. Aortic valve replacement and ascending aortic wrapping were performed in 5 patients, Bentall or Cabrol operation in 6, and combined aortic arch reconstruction and Carbrol operation in 2, as the initial surgery. Patients who had an aortic dissection (Stanford type A) at initial surgery were assigned to group I (n=7), while those with an aortic root aneurysm were assigned to group II (n=8). In group I, 3 patients required a second operation for the remaining aortic arch aneurysm, and 1 died due to a late rupture of the distal aneurysm. In group II, no patient needed a reoperation; however, 1 died due to an intracranial hemorrhage and another due to composite valve graft failure and distal dissection. The results thus indicate that aortic dissection seems to affect long-term outcome, and therefore the combined repair of the aortic root and transverse arch is recommended in Marfan patients with aortic dissection involving the transverse aortic arch.     

Reoperations on the ascending aorta and aortic root: pitfalls and results in 134 patients

BACKGROUND: This analysis was performed to evaluate the results of reoperations on the ascending aorta and aortic root. METHODS: All reoperations (n = 134) on the aortic root and ascending aorta performed between February 1981 and April 1998 were retrospectively analyzed. Indications for reintervention were a true or false aneurysm (35%), acute dissection (3.0%), aortic valve stenosis and/or insufficiency (23.1%), prosthetic valve endocarditis (32.8%), and combinations (4.5%). The principal reoperations performed were aortic root replacement (composite graft, freestyle, aortic allograft, or pulmonary autograft) in 116 patients, ascending aortic replacement in 10 patients, and closure of a false aneurysm in 5 patients. Results were analyzed using univariate statistical methods. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 6.6% (8 patients). Univariate predictors of hospital death were preoperative functional class III or IV (p = 0.02), an interval of less than 6 months between the primary and actual operation (p = 0.02), preoperative creatinine level of more than 200 micromol/L (p = 0.001), acute aortic dissection (p = 0.001), intraoperative technical problems (p = 0.001), and postoperative dialysis (p = 0.001). Freedom from repetitive reoperation was 99% at 1 year and 98% at 5 and 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperations on the aortic root and ascending aorta can be performed with an early mortality which is very acceptable.     

Complete aortic root replacement in patients with small aortic annulus

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effectiveness of our surgical method using a modified self-assembled valved composite graft in patients with a narrow aortic annulus. METHODS: Between August 2000 and May 2001, 10 consecutive patients with a narrow aortic annulus underwent replacement of the aortic valve and the ascending aorta using a valved composite graft with mechanical valve prosthesis. The indication for surgery was aneurysm of the ascending aorta (8 patients) and aortic dissection (2 patients). To avoid valve-patient mismatch, a modified self-assembled valved composite graft was used. RESULTS: There was no hospital mortality. Echocardiographic evaluation before discharge showed excellent hemodynamics with a mean transvalvular gradient of 10.7 mm Hg (standard deviation +/- 2.8 mm Hg). CONCLUSIONS: The described valved composite graft offers very good hemodynamic performance and is a simple and effective device to avoid valve-patient mismatch in patients with a small aortic annulus who need aortic root replacement.     

Repair of an ascending aortic aneurysm using reduction aortoplasty in a Jehovah's Witness

Reduction ascending aortoplasty has been advocated as a possible alternative to traditional graft replacement for treatment of aneurysms of the ascending aorta and root. We report a case of a 58-year-old Jehovah's Witness female, with a 5.5-cm ascending aortic aneurysm and critical aortic stenosis. She underwent aortic valve replacement and reduction aortoplasty buttressed with a Dacron graft. We reviewed the history and contemporary applications of this technique and concluded that aortic reduction with externally supported aortoplasty may represent a viable option to treat Jehovah's Witness patients with ascending aorta and root aneurysm.     

Surgery for aortic dissection associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve

Congenital bicuspid aortic valve is a relatively rare malformation. It is reported that the presence of this anomaly predisposes the patient to the development of dissecting aortic aneurysms. Between 1981 and October 1997, 7 patients with aortic dissection associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve underwent surgical treatment at our institution. The patients consisted of six males and one female. The age of the patients ranged from 54 to 74 years (mean 61 years). The classification of dissecting aortic aneurysms was DeBakey type I dissection in 4 patients, type II dissection in 2 patients and type IIIb dissection in 1 patient. These 7 patients constituted 2.0% (7/356) of all cases of surgical operation for dissecting thoracic aneurysm. Aortic valve dysfunction was noted in 5 patients, 4 of whom had previously undergone aortic valve replacement. We performed graft replacement of the ascending aorta in 4 patients, graft replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic arch in 2 patients, and graft replacement of the descending aorta in 1 patient. There were no hospital deaths in any of the 7 patients. Pathological examination of surgical specimens of the aortic wall showed cystic medial necrosis in 2 patients and mucoid degeneration in 4 patients. In addition to complication by valve dysfunction, patients with congenital bicuspid aortic valve are at risk for the development of aortic dissection.     

Surgical Treatment of Ascending Aortic Pathology

Among the first 10,200 valvular replacements performed in our unit, 288 complex repairs of the ascending aorta were done for various aortic pathology. Aneurysms of the ascending aorta were the most frequent; 53 supracoronary artery aneurysms with aortic valvular insufficiency were treated by the separate replacement of the aortic valve and the supracoronary ascending aorta; 206 annulo-aortic ectasia had total and combined replacement of the ascending aorta and the aortic valve with a personal modification of the Bentall's technique using an 8-mm diameter Dacron graft to perform the reimplantation of the coronary arteries on the composite aortic grafts. The operative mortality for the first 100 patients was 4% and for the entire 206 patients, 6%. Late mortality during a follow-up period ranging from 18 months to 8 years was 11%. The actuarial survival rate at 8 years is 75%; 25 patients restudied by angiography demonstrated satisfactory results with neither stenosis nor aneurysm on the coronary graft but a recurrent or persisting chronic distal aortic dissection in four patients. In 26 cases of aortic valvular endocarditis, large abscesses of the aortic annulus involved the aortic root. In 11, the aortic repair consisted of the insertion of a subcoronary valved conduit (two early deaths, two late deaths, one reoperation, seven good results--maximum follow-up of eight years). Twelve patients had a supracoronary valved conduit with four early deaths, one late death, and two reoperations; seven are alive and well, two to six years later. Three patients previously operated had a left ventricular abdominal aorta valved conduit; two of them are alive and well up to six years later. In three patients with iterative aortic paravalvular leak (recurring three or four times), ablation of the aortic insufficiency was obtained by interposition of a composite valved graft in the ascending aorta.     

Thoracic aortic aneurysm associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve.

Congenital bicuspid aortic valve is a relatively rare malformation. It is reported that the presence of this anomaly predisposes the patient to development of true aortic aneurysms or dissecting aortic aneurysms. Between 1981 and August 1997, 25 patients with an aneurysm of the thoracic aorta associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve underwent surgical treatment at the authors' institution. There were 20 males and five females. The age of the patients ranged from 27 to 74 years (mean 53 years). There were 18 patients with true ascending aortic aneurysms (of which 10 presented with annulo-aortic ectasia) and seven with dissecting aortic aneurysms (four with DeBakey type I dissection, two with type II and one with type IIIb). These 25 patients constituted 2.6% (25/973) of all cases of surgical operations for aneurysms in the thoracic aorta. Aortic valve dysfunction was noted in 20 patients. The authors performed a valved conduit operation in nine patients, aortic valve replacement and wrapping of the ascending aorta in six, graft replacement of the ascending aorta in five, graft replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic arch in four, and graft replacement of the descending aorta in one. No hospital deaths occurred in the authors' patients. Pathological examination of surgical specimens of the aortic wall showed cystic medial necrosis in 11 patients and mucoid degeneration in nine. In patients with congenital bicuspid aortic valve, attention should be paid to aneurysmal dilatation and aortic dissection as complications in addition to valve dysfunction.     

Surgical treatment of aneurysms of the ascending aorta associated with severe aortic regurgitation

From January 1979 to June 1982 31 patients have had simultaneous ascending aortic aneurysm repair and aortic valve replacement. Fifteen patients (group 1) received a composite graft; seven patients (group 2) had separate aortic valve and supracoronary ascending aorta prostheses; and nine patients (group 3) had aortic valve replacement and "tailoring" of the ascending aorta. The mean age was 50 (SD 14) years. Nine patients had acute dissection, five with the coronary ostia affected. Emergency surgery was performed in 10 cases. There were six early deaths (19.4%), none of them due to technical complications during surgery. The mortality rate was 56% for patients with acute dissection operated on as an emergency and 4.5% for patients having elective operations. Appreciable haemorrhage occurred in four patients (12.9%). No neurological complications occurred. There was one late death. The survivors were followed up for one to four years. There was one case of recurrence of aneurysm. No ischaemic complications resulted from coronary reimplantation. There were no significant differences in the results of the three groups. Simultaneous ascending aortic aneurysm repair and aortic valve replacement can be accomplished with an acceptable mortality rate and little morbidity.     

Effects of ascending aorta replacement on aortic root dilatation.

OBJECTIVE: Because of an increase of aortic root wall stress, prosthetic replacement of the ascending aorta might be a risk factor for the progressive increase of the aortic root dimension. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the aortic root diameter change and the progression of aortic valve regurgitation late after ascending aorta replacement for different ethiology. METHODS: Sixty-three late survivors after supracoronary ascending aortic replacement were evaluated. Forty-one patients were operated on for acute aortic dissecting aneurysm (group I) and 22 for chronic atherosclerotic non-dissecting aneurysm (group II). Aortic root diameter and aortic valve regurgitation were assessed echocardiografically after a mean follow-up of 63+/-31 months and were compared with those early after surgery. RESULTS: Seven patients of group I (17%) needed reoperation for aortic root dilatation or dissection. Twenty-five percent of the patients (15 of group I and 1 of group II) showed at least a 10% increase in aortic root diameter at follow-up (46.8+/-6.1 vs. 38.1+/-6.1mm, P<0.0001). Aortic root diameter increased almost exclusively in patients operated on for acute dissecting aneurysm. A significant worsening of aortic valve insufficiency with time was evident only in patients operated on for acute dissecting aneurysm with an higher incidence in those with progressive root dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: Both the increase of aortic root diameter and the progressive worsening of aortic valve insufficiency seem to justify a more aggressive treatment of the aortic root at the time of surgery for acute aortic dissecting aneurysm but not for chronic atherosclerotic non-dissecting aneurysms.     

Long-term effectiveness of operations for ascending aortic dissections

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term effectiveness of a strategy for managing the aortic root and distal aorta according to the pathology in ascending aortic dissection. METHODS: From 1978 to 1995, 208 patients underwent operations for acute (n = 135) and chronic (n = 73) ascending aortic dissection. Surgical strategies included valve resuspension with supracoronary aortic root repair and ascending aortic graft for normal sinuses and valve (n = 135), composite valve and ascending aortic graft for abnormal sinuses and valve (n = 47), and valve replacement and supracoronary ascending aortic graft for normal sinuses and abnormal valve (n = 26). Resection extended into the arch only if the intimal tear originated in or extended to the aortic arch (n = 31). RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 14%. Cardiogenic shock (P =.002) and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (P =.001) were associated with increased risk; use of circulatory arrest (P =.0003) decreased risk. Survival was 87%, 68%, and 52% at 30 days, 5 years, and 10 years, respectively. Advanced age, earlier date of operation, composite graft, and arch resection were associated with decreased survival; residual distal dissected aorta was not. Reoperation was required for 5 proximal and 8 distal problems. CONCLUSIONS: In both acute and chronic ascending aortic dissections, (1) circulatory arrest is associated with low early mortality; (2) with normal sinuses and valve, supracoronary repair of the dissected aortic root and valve resuspension is effective long term; and (3) residual distal dissected aorta does not decrease late survival and has a low risk of aneurysmal change and reoperation for at least 10 years.     

A case of ascending aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement in congenital bicuspid aortic valve]

Congenital bicuspid aortic valve is a risk factor of aortic dissection, but the case is rare in Japan. Several reports described ascending aortic aneurysm after aortic valve replacement. In these reports, most of aneurysms were false aneurysm, but the cases of ascending aortic dissection were rare. In this case, dissecting aneurysm of the ascending aorta occurred 4 years after aortic valve replacement, which was performed with mechanical prosthesis because of infective endocarditis, and it was repaired successfully by the modified Cabrol's method. This case was congenital bicuspid aortic valve, and had already been complicated with moderate aortic dilatation in the ascending aorta. In patients of congenital bicuspid aortic valve with aortic dilatation, consideration of complete replacement of the ascending aorta with aortic valve replacement is important.     

Surgical treatment of aneurysm of the ascending aorta with aortic insufficiency and marked displacement of the coronary ostia.

Six patients with a large aneurysm of the ascending aorta involving the root of the aorta and severe aortic valve insufficiency owing to marked annular dilatation were treated by replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve with a composite unit. It was also necessary to transpose the origin of the coronary arteries with the use of saphenous vein grafts. In 3 patients, the aneurysm was due to a chronic dissection. In one patient, the aneurysm extended beyond the arch of the aorta. There were no operative deaths. One patient died suddenly of pulmonary emboli 11 months after surgery. The remaining 5 patients are doing well, 5 months to 4 years postoperatively.     

Aortic root replacement versus aortic valve replacement: a case-match study

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that patients with aortic valve disease and dilatation of the ascending aorta are at risk for later dissection or rupture of the aortic wall when the dilated ascending aorta is not replaced or reinforced at the time of aortic valve replacement. In order to find out whether the more complex surgical procedure of aortic root replacement carries a higher early or late postoperative risk than isolated aortic valve replacement, we conducted a matched-pair study with patients of both groups. METHODS: Between June 1993 and August 1998, 100 consecutive patients with aortic valve disease and ectasia/aneurysm of the ascending aorta underwent replacement of the aortic valve and the ascending aorta with a CarboSeal composite graft (CarboSeal; Sulzer Carbo-Medics Inc, Austin, TX). Identical bileaflet valve prostheses (CarboMedics; Sulzer CarboMedics Inc, Austin, TX) were implanted during the same time period in 928 patients for aortic valve disease. On the basis of various preoperative clinical variables 100 patients with aortic valve replacement were matched to the 100 patients with replacement of the aortic root. The duration of follow-up for both groups was similar with 37 + 17 months (range, 9 to 70) for the CarboSeal group and 38 + 14 months (range, 13 to 65) for the CarboMedics group. Survival and morbidity were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and risk-adjusted mortality was evaluated by multivariate analysis in a Cox regression model. RESULTS: The early postoperative mortality of 1% in the CarboSeal group and 4% in the CarboMedics group was insignificantly different. Although the overall survival rate at 5 years was lower (60.7% vs 86.3%; p = 0.13) in the CarboSeal group, the freedom from cardiac mortality and valve-related morbidity was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve can be performed with similar operative risk, valve-related morbidity, and late cardiac mortality as isolated aortic valve replacement.     

Evaluation of composite graft replacement of the aortic root and ascending aorta

Replacement of the entire aortic root and ascending aorta with a composite graft was done in 7 patients with ascending aortic aneurysm and aortic regurgitation. There was no worrisome postoperative bleeding, and follow-up aortography has demonstrated correction of the aortic root disease in all patients and no complications referable to the coronary artery implantation.     

Surgically treated aortic root aneurysm following aortic valve replacement

A 65-year-old man with aortic regurgitation underwent aortic valve replacement with a St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve about 6 years ago. At that time, the aortic root was slightly dilated at about 40 mm in diameter and the ascending aorta was within the normal range. This year, the man was diagnosed with an aortic root aneurysm in regular follow-up echocardiography. Chest-enhanced computed tomography and chest aortography at our hospital demonstrated a pear-like aortic root aneurysm about 60 mm in diameter. Elective operation for the aortic root aneurysm was conducted September 29, 1999, based on the Bentall procedure. Composite graft replacement with coronary reconstruction was conducted using a 28-mm Hemashield prosthetic graft and a 23-mm St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve under cardiopulmonary bypass. An 8-mm Hemashield graft was interposed on the left main coronary artery and the right coronary artery was directly anastomosed using a Carrel patch method. The postoperative course was uneventful and post-operative examination demonstrated good surgical results. Histological findings of the aortic aneurysm wall showed cystic medial necrosis. Surgical cases of aortic root aneurysm after aortic valve replacement are rare, but serious complications with the possibility of rupture or dissection warrant surgical intervention.