De novo concurrent papillary renal cell carcinoma and angiomyolipoma in a kidney allograft: evidence of donor origin

In the general population, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a relatively common neoplasm; however, the papillary RCC subtype is infrequent and represents only 10 to 15% of all RCC. Angiomyolipoma is a well-known common benign tumor. The occurrence of RCC in association with angiomyolipoma is a rare event, with only approximately 50 cases reported in the nontransplantation setting. In transplant recipients, RCC can develop in native kidneys, but its occurrence "de novo" in the renal allograft is very rare with an estimated incidence of less than 0.5%. We report here the case of a 39-year-old woman who underwent cadaveric renal transplantation in 1990. No lesion was observed in the allograft during the pre- and perioperative period or on early postoperative ultrasounds. No graft rejection occurred under a standard triple immunosuppressive therapy. Thirteen years later, during a routine ultrasonography, 2 solid masses were discovered in the allograft, both of them richly vascularized. She underwent allograft nephrectomy and the histologic findings revealed that one of the tumors was a chromophilic (type 1) papillary RCC (2.5 cm in diameter) and the other, an angiomyolipoma (1.5 cm). Microsatellite analysis of the allograft, as compared with the recipient peripheral blood leukocytes, demonstrated that the 2 tumors (1 malignant and 1 benign) were of donor origin. To our knowledge, this is the first report of de novo concurrent papillary RCC and angiomyolipoma in a renal allograft.     

Subtypes of renal cell carcinoma with defined genomic alterations: diagnostic and prognostic significance

The World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 classification of renal neoplasia defines renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) with genomic alterations: (1) succinate dehydrogenase deficient (SDH) RCC, (2) hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC) syndrome-associated RCC and (3) the MiT family translocation carcinoma (Xp11 translocation carcinoma and t(6;11) carcinoma). Genomic alterations also define two syndromes associated with RCC that have a varied histology; tuberous sclerosis complex and Birt-Hogg-Dube. This review will examine the WHO entities and the two aforementioned syndromes, and discuss a genomic alteration (TCEB1 mutation) that appears to define a subset of clear cell RCCs that histomorphologically overlap with clear cell tubulopapillary RCC. The focus will be on diagnostic considerations from the pathologic perspective, and include discussion of clinical features, prevalence, prognosis, common and uncommon immunohistochemistical stains and molecular testing.     

Coexistence of multiple myeloma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a case report and review of literature

Coexistence of multiple myeloma (MM) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an extremely rare condition. Nevertheless, there is a higher than expected incidence of co-occurrence of these two malignancies. Several case series, in the recent past, have postulated an association between MM and RCC. Population-based data analyses have revealed a bi-directional association between these two malignancies. However, the cause still remains speculative up to date. Here, we aim to describe a patient with MM and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) one after another for the second time from China. Clinical implications are discussed with a critical review of existing literature and we expect to draw much more awareness among clinicians regarding such association.     

The expanding role of renal mass biopsy

Usage of renal mass biopsy has increased in recent years, ranging from selected clinical scenarios to routine implementation in some institutions. Major tasks for the field of diagnostic histopathology include discriminating primary renal cell cancers from other tumors, especially metastases, hematolymphoid tumors, and urothelial carcinoma. Within primary renal cell neoplasms, relevant distinctions include recognizing clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma, which despite its resemblance to clear cell cancer is nonaggressive, as well as discriminating oncocytoma from chromophobe carcinoma. Helpful immunohistochemical markers include PAX8 for verification of primary renal cell lineage and carbonic anhydrase IX for support of clear cell subtype. Cytokeratin 7 is generally considered the best marker for discriminating oncocytoma from chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, showing only rare positive cells in oncocytoma and greater staining in chromophobe carcinoma. For metastatic tumors, attempting to discriminate clear cell from non-clear cell types may be important for treatment selection.     

Tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma with poorly differentiated foci is indicative of aggressive behavior: clinicopathologic study of two cases and review of the literature

Tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma (TCRCC) is a rare, recently characterized RCC subtype with distinctive clinicopathologic and genetic characterizations as well as typical behaviors in an indolent fashion. However, sporadic case reports in the literature have indicated that TCRCC with sarcomatoid differentiation or poorly differentiated (PD) foci could behave aggressively. Herein, we reported two cases of TCRCC with PD foci indentified from our consultative service. Both patients were male and aged 66 y and 47 y, respectively. The first patient experienced radical nephrectomy while the other was treated by partial nephrectomy. Macroscopically, both tumors were described as partly cystic and solid with the greatest diameter measuring of 12-cm and 4.5-cm, respectively. Histologically, both lesions had classic areas of TCRCC occupying most part of the tumor with small papillary RCC component. In case one, PD foci were scatteredly distributed and mixed with TCRCC and papillary RCC components, while in the other case the PD foci were adjacent to the areas of TCRCC. In both tumors, the PD foci were composed of irregular, often angulated, small tubules lined by atypical eosinophilic cells and surrounded by desmoplastic stroma, resembling collecting duct carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry, in both tumors, both TCRCC component and PD foci showed the similar immunoprofiles, i.e., labeling strongly and diffusely with PAX8, AMACR and Vimentin, and focally with CK34βE12 but not with renal cell carcinoma marker or P63. In case one, the tumor invaded extensively into the adjacent renal parenchyma and focally into both renal sinusal and perirenal adipose tissues. The patient had metastasis in the pelvic cavity at the time of diagnosis and succumbed to the disease without further treatment 3 months later. The other case was organ confined but with focal positive renal parenchymal margin. The patient subsequently underwent radical nephrectomy and was in a good status without evidence of tumor recurrence or metastasis at a follow-up of 8 months.     

Metastasis of breast cancer to renal cancer: report of a rare case

Tumor-to-tumor metastasis (TTM) is a rare phenomenon. We present a case of an invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast metastasizing to a clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Breast cancer (BC) metastasis to the RCC is rarely reported, especially in resected kidney tumor. In several cases reported, IDC was the exclusively histologic type of BC metastasized to RCC. It seems that the different molecular type of IDC doesn’t affect the metastatic tendencies to RCC. TTM was an indicator of diffuse disease. For any patient with a history of breast cancer, especially with multi-organs metastasis, resection of kidney tumor should be carefully considered.     

Decreased expression of receptor tyrosine kinase of EphB1 protein in renal cell carcinomas

Receptors tyrosine kinase of Eph superfamily plays an important role in human cancers. We previously found that EphB1 subtype is down-regulated in gastric cancer, colorectal cancer and ovary serous carcinoma. Fore the more, the decreased expression of EphB1 is related to invasion and metastasis in cancers. Although EphB1 has been revealed as an important receptor in cancers, our understanding of its roles in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is limited. In the present study, using specific anit-EphB1 polyclonal antibody and immunohistochemistry, we evaluated EphB1 protein expression levels in RCC specimens surgically resected from 82 patients (including 62 conventional clear-cell RCC, 10 papillary, and 10 chromophobic RCC cases). We found EphB1 protein is positively expressed in the epithelium of renal tubules. Decreased expression of EphB1 was found in all RCC carcinomas compared with expression in the normal epithelium of renal tubules. EphB1 protein moderately expressed in chromophobic RCC, weakly expressed in clear-cell RCC and negatively expressed in papillary RCC. Our results indicate that EphB1 may be involved in carcinogenesis of RCC, the molecular mechanisms of down-regulation of EphB1 including genetic and epigenetic alterations and the dedicated roles of EphB1 in occurrence and progress of RCC need to be explicated in next step.     

Multicentric papillary renal cell carcinoma associated with renal adenomatosis

A case of multicentric papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) associated with renal adenomatosis in the bilateral kidneys is reported. Bilateral multiple renal cysts in a 46-year-old man were pointed out incidentally by ultrasonography. Some of the left renal lesions were considered to be RCC, and left radical nephrectomy was performed accordingly. The left kidney was occupied by numerous solid nodules, which ranged from yellow to tan in color, and some of the large ones had foci of hemorrhage and necrosis. Microscopically, most of the tumors showed papillary RCC associated with renal adenoma, while others consisted only of adenomas. Ten months later, multiple lesions of the right kidney, which were initially considered to be multiple cysts, were found to have become enlarged and some of them were diagnosed as RCC. Thus, right radical nephrectomy was also performed, and these tumors showed the same features as the left renal tumors. The patient's familial history was not remarkable. The kidneys revealed various histological features, ranging from dysplastic to adenoma or carcinoma, including transitional or overlapping features between them. The findings suggest an adenoma-carcinoma sequence in papillary RCC. It is worth considering such entities.     

囊性肾细胞癌3例报道及文献复习

目的探讨囊性肾细胞癌的病理形态学特征及鉴别诊断。方法对3例囊性肾细胞癌进行光镜观察及免疫组化标记,并复习文献。结果肿瘤有确切的瘤体,由厚的假纤维包膜围绕,切面见大小不等的囊腔。镜下见囊腔被覆无明显异型的透明细胞,纤维性囊壁间隔中可见透明细胞巢。免疫表型:透明细胞CK、EMA强阳性,CD68、M ac387阴性,K i-67、p53弱阳性。结论囊性肾细胞癌少见,预后好,术前易与多囊肾、囊性变肾细胞癌和囊性肾瘤等混淆。本瘤的特征是囊性区显著,囊腔内衬单层或数层异型小的透明细胞,囊壁之间可见透明细胞巢。     

Ghrelin expression in normal kidney tissue and renal carcinomas

Ghrelin expression in cancers is either reduced/absent or increased depending on the organs involved. The aims of this study were to investigate: (i) whether there are differences in ghrelin peptide expression between kidney tissues from a series of renal cell carcinoma cases, oncocytomas, and normal controls; (ii) whether there are correlations between tissue ghrelin levels in a series of renal carcinoma cases and normal controls; and (iii) how normal is kidney ghrelin expression per mg tissue as compared with the normal stomach tissue ghrelin level. We studied 7 normal stomach and 7 normal kidney samples, 21 clear cell renal carcinomas, 7 chromophobe type renal cell carcinomas (RCC), 7 papillary type RCC, and 7 oncocytoma samples. Tissue ghrelin expression was measured by RIA and immunohistochemistry. Grades 1–3 clear renal cell carcinomas, chromophobe type RCC, papillary type RCC, and oncocytomas expressed 88%, 94%, 95%, 51%, 75%, and 48% less ghrelin than the normal kidney, respectively. Overall, we concluded that ghrelin expression in renal cell carcinoma tissues is always lower than that in normal kidney or is absent. This low level or lack of ghrelin may play a role in the etiopathogenesis and progression of cancer.     

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma: a review

The disease concept of clear cell (tubulo) papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCP-RCC) as a distinct subtype of renal cell carcinoma has been recently established. First described in the setting of end stage renal disease, this tumor type is more frequently recognized and encountered in a sporadic setting. In this article, we provide an overview of the recent understanding of this tumor. Macroscopically, tumors are well circumscribed with well-developed tumor capsule. Histologically, the tumor cells are cuboidal to low columnar cell with clear cytoplasm and papillary and tubulo-papillary configuration. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells generally show diffuse expression for cytokeratin 7, CA9 (cup-shaped pattern), HIF-1, GLUT-1 and high molecular weight cytokeratin, but negative for AMACR, RCC Ma and TFE3. CD10 is negative or focally positive in most tumors. Genetically, this tumor has no characteristics of clear cell RCC or papillary RCC. Prognostically, patients with CCP-RCC behave in an indolent fashion in all previously reported cases. In conclusion, although this tumor has been integrated into recent International Society of Urologic Pathology Classification of renal neoplasia, both aspects of disease concept and clinical behavior are yet to be fully elucidated. Further publications of large cohorts of patients will truly help understand the biologic potential and the molecular underpinnings of this tumor type.     

Low-grade renal cell carcinoma arising from the lower nephron: a case report with immunohistochemical, histochemical and ultrastructural studies

Most renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are composed of clear cells with sinusoid-like vasculatures and originate from the proximal tubule. On the other hand, collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) and chromophobe RCC are thought to originate from the lower nephron. In the present study, we present a case of unusual RCC. The patient was a 68-year-old Japanese woman who had developed general fatigue with hematuria. Computed tomography revealed a left renal tumor suggesting sarcoma. The resected tumor was located in the renal parenchyma, measuring 12 x 10 x 8 cm in size. Histologically, the tumor consisted principally of cuboidal cells forming parallel or radiating arrays, continuous with the spindle-shaped cells. Most parts of the tumor showed hemorrhagic necrosis. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells were positive for high molecular weight cytokeratins, vinculin, vimentin, CD15 and epithelial membrane antigen, and showed affinities with some kinds of lectins. N- and E-cadherins and beta-catenin were diffusely positive in tumor cells. Nuclear positivity for Ki-67 and p53 protein were approximately 2.0 and 1.7%, respectively. Considering its morphological and histochemical natures, this tumor is considered to have originated from the lower nephron, which is unique for a tumor of low-grade malignancy.     

Fluorescence in situ hybridization as an adjunct tool in the diagnosis of primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma in fine needle aspiration specimens

We investigated the role of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the diagnosis of primary renal neoplasms and lesions suspicious for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Consecutive fine‐needle aspiration biopsies (FNAB) of 39 renal masses and 41 metastatic tumours suspicious for renal cell origin were assessed with an immunohistochemical panel for CK7, RCC antigen, CD10, AMACR, PAX8, vimentin, and CD117. In addition, FISH was performed using probes for chromosomes 1p, 3p, 7, 17, X, and Y. A total of 31 of 39 primary renal masses and 33 of 41 metastatic tumors suspicious for renal origin demonstrated typical cytological and immunohistochemical (IHC) features of subtypes of renal neoplasms (40 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), 20 papillary RCC, and 4 renal oncocytomas). FISH analysis of 15 randomly selected cases each of primary and metastatic lesions revealed chromosomal abnormalities consistent with the diagnosis in 73% of these cases. Of 8 primary renal masses demonstrating atypical microscopic features and noncontributory IHC profiles, FISH was helpful in subtyping 5 (62%) of these lesions (2 clear cell RCC, 1 solid variant of oncocytic papillary RCC, 1 mixed clear cell and papillary RCC, and 1 chromophobe RCC with papillary architecture). Of 8 metastatic tumors clinically suspicious for renal cell origin and supportive, but nondiagnostic IHC, FISH revealed supportive chromosomal changes in 6 (75%) cases. In conclusion FISH analysis on FNAB material, even with limited tissue, may be contributory to the diagnosis and subtyping of RCC in diagnostically challenging biopsies. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2014;42:1013–1023. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: an immunohistochemical evaluation of the use of antibodies for differential diagnosis

Collecting duct carcinoma is a highly aggressive renal epithelial malignancy, although it accounts for less than 1% of the incidence of renal epithelial neoplasms. Differential diagnoses between collecting duct carcinoma, pelvic urothelial carcinoma with marked invasion to the renal parenchyma (invasive urothelial carcinoma), and papillary renal cell carcinoma is often challenging. In our current study, we examined the utility of using commercially available antibodies, in conjunction with lectin histochemistry, for such differential diagnoses. We examined 17 cases of collecting duct carcinoma, 10 cases of invasive urothelial carcinoma and 15 cases of papillary renal cell carcinoma (type 1, 6 cases; type 2, 9 cases) in these evaluations. Our results indicated that Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1, E-cadherin, and c-KIT were frequently positive in collecting duct carcinoma and invasive urothelial carcinoma, in comparison with papillary renal cell carcinoma, which had negative results for CD10 and α-methylacyl CoA racemase. We found, however, that collecting duct carcinoma showed positivity for high-molecular-weight cytokeratin and low-molecular-weight cytokeratin at a low frequency compared with invasive urothelial carcinoma, and that these distinctions need further careful evaluation. In addition, high-molecular-weight cytokeratin positivity was not a reliable marker for collecting duct carcinoma. We conclude that Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1 reactivity and positivity for E-cadherin and c-KIT are effective in distinguishing collecting duct carcinoma from papillary renal cell carcinoma, and that negative results for α-methylacyl CoA racemase and CD10 are potentially useful hallmarks of this distinction also. In contrast, a differential diagnosis for collecting duct carcinoma and invasive urothelial carcinoma will require careful examination of multiple routinely stained specimens, particularly in cases of in situ neoplastic lesions in the pelvic mucosa.     

Tumour-to-tumour metastasis: a rare cause of apparent intratumoural heterogeneity in conventional clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Tumour-to-tumour metastasis is a rare phenomenon and few case reports exist that describe tumor-to-tumor metastases to and from clear cell renal cell carcinoma.¹ In order for metastases to become established, tumour cells must be shed, survive in circulation, and implant, grow, and establish vascularity in a distant site - which in our case was within another primary tumour.² Tumours are, by definition, environments that promote growth of neoplastic cells. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma, in particular, provides a unique pro-tumour environment, in part due to its molecular characteristics, affording metastatic tumours the opportunity to survive and grow.³ We describe a case of metastatic breast carcinoma that was found within a conventional clear cell type renal cell carcinoma. Further, this case illustrates the potential for sampling errors with percutaneous biopsies of renal masses and highlights the need for pathologists to consider the rare possibility of tumour-to-tumour metastasis when confronted with tumours showing striking morphologic heterogeneity.     

Pathogenic germline variants in patients with features of hereditary renal cell carcinoma: Evidence for further locus heterogeneity

Inherited renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is associated with multiple familial cancer syndromes but most individuals with features of non‐syndromic inherited RCC do not harbor variants in the most commonly tested renal cancer predisposition genes (CPGs). We investigated whether undiagnosed cases might harbor mutations in CPGs that are not routinely tested for by testing 118 individuals with features suggestive of inherited RCC (family history of RCC, two or more primary RCC aged <60 years, or early onset RCC ≤46 years) for the presence of pathogenic variants in a large panel of CPGs. All individuals had been prescreened for pathogenic variants in the major RCC genes. We detected pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants of potential clinical relevance in 16.1% (19/118) of individuals, including P/LP variants in BRIP1 (n = 4), CHEK2 (n = 3), MITF (n = 1), and BRCA1 (n = 1). Though the power to detect rare variants was limited by sample size the frequency of truncating variants in BRIP1, 4/118, was significantly higher than in controls (P = 5.92E‐03). These findings suggest that the application of genetic testing for larger inherited cancer gene panels in patients with indicators of a potential inherited RCC can increase the diagnostic yield for P/LP variants. However, the clinical utility of such a diagnostic strategy requires validation and further evaluation and in particular, confirmation of rarer RCC genotype‐phenotype associations is required.     

Metastatic urinary tract cancers in pap test: Cytomorphologic findings and differential diagnosis

Although the cervical Pap test was devised for the detection of primary cervical neoplasia, it can provide additional diagnostic information, and in some cases, be diagnostic for noncervical processes. The diagnosis of metastatic extrauterine cervical cancers on the Pap test is extremely rare; and in most cases, it is the result of an ovarian or fallopian tube primary. Further, urinary tract cancers, including renal and urinary primaries are exceedingly rare. To our knowledge, six surgical cases of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been described. We report the first case of metastatic clear cell RCC detected on the cervical Pap test. Additionally, to our knowledge, we report the second case of metastatic high‐grade urothelial carcinoma detected on the cervical Pap test. Both patients had a history of malignancy, which underscore the importance of broadening the differential diagnosis to rule out cytomorphologic features consistent with a patient's primary diagnosis when interpreting the cervical Pap test. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016;44:1078–1081. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Renal cell carcinoma arising in a long pre-existing angiomyolipoma

Angiomyolipoma (AML) is a mixed mesenchymal tumor belonging to the family of perivascular epithelioid cell tumors. Concurrent development of AML and adult renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is very rare. Herein is presented a unique case in which RCC arose within a previously detected AML tumor mass. A 40-year-old woman had been diagnosed with AML of the right kidney. Fifteen years later, during a regular radiographic examination, a new lesion was detected at the lower pole of the right kidney adjacent to the previously described AML. Because RCC was clinically suspected, the patient underwent right nephrectomy. Macroscopically, the tumor had a yellowish, transparent, fatty area and an opaque yellowish area with cystic features. Microscopically, the former tumor, consisting of an admixture of mature adipose tissue with smooth muscle and vascular tissue, was diagnosed as AML. The latter tumor was diagnosed as RCC (clear cell type). RCC was not completely enclosed within the AML, but overlapped it. No fibrous capsule was found between these tumors. Although this situation is very rare, from a clinical and pathological point of view it is important to consider the possibility that RCC might arise within AML. The relationship between the two lesions is discussed with a review of the literature.