Prevalence of adverse childhood experiences and effect on outcomes in bariatric surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are defined as childhood maltreatment (sexual, physical, and emotional abuse and neglect) and other childhood traumatic experiences. Published prevalence estimates for ACEs in bariatric samples vary greatly and evidence on the association between ACEs and bariatric surgery weight loss and psychosocial outcomes is inconclusive. A systematic literature search on PubMed/Medline, PsycInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Open Grey for studies published until August 30, 2021, yielded 21 publications for qualitative synthesis: 20 reporting on prevalence of ACEs in bariatric surgery candidates and patients, and 10 on the association of ACEs with outcomes. In meta-analysis, overall moderate to high heterogeneity was observed for prevalence estimates and moderate heterogeneity was observed for associations. Prevalence estimate for at least 1 form of ACEs (6 studies, n = 1368 patients) was 51% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32%–70%). Effect size (Hedge’s g) for the difference between the groups of patients reporting any or a high number of ACEs versus no or a low number of ACEs was calculated from means, standard deviations and group size, or P values. Based on 7 studies (n = 946 patients), the association between ACEs and weight loss was not significant (Hedge’s g = –.15 [95% CI: –.38 to .09]; I² = 53%), regardless of short- or long-term follow-up (P = .413) and the proportion of patients in each study receiving Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (β = .0005, P = .868). Preliminary findings based on 3 short- and long-term studies (n = 414 patients) showed that ACEs were significantly (P = .001) associated with higher postoperative depressive symptoms (Hedge’s g = .50 [95% CI: .22–.78]; I² = 36%). Associations between ACEs and other psychosocial outcomes such as eating pathology were reported narratively. There is a need for additional long-term studies using validated assessment tools for ACEs to evaluate the effect of ACEs on weight and psychosocial outcomes after bariatric surgery.     

Revisional bariatric surgery in a transplant patient

IntroductionA BMI of over 35–45 kg/m2 is deemed the upper limit for considering a patient for a renal transplant. Voluntary weight loss attempts are a major concern for patients while on hemodialysis, however, bariatric surgeries have opened up a new door to notable weight loss results, even demonstrating significant improvements of patients’ diabetic profile and hypertension.Case reportCase of a 52-year-old male with a BMI of 42 in end-stage renal disease, that needed a kidney transplant but was ineligible to be placed on the waiting list due to his weight. A laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was performed to aid with his weight loss. He also showed major improvements in his hypertension and diabetes profiles. The patient started gaining weight as well as showing deterioration in his diabetic control. He underwent the renal transplant 1.5 years post LSG, after which he showed improvements in his blood results, diabetic and hypertensive control. However, his weight began to increase again, for which he underwent gastric bypass. Since then, the patients' glucose, BUN and creatinine have normalized and his weight continued to drop, reaching a BMI of 31.83 kg/m2 2 years post bypass.ConclusionBariatric surgery is a safe and effective procedure to assist renal transplant patients in losing weight. In addition, it has proven to be effective in the management of the co-morbidities that are associated with renal failure. Our study was also able to prove that converting form an SG to a bypass in a transplant patient is a safe and feasible option.     

Low overall mortality during 10 years of bariatric surgery: nationwide study on 63,469 procedures from the Scandinavian Obesity Registry

BackgroundBariatric surgery results in an improvement in quality of life, co-morbid diseases, and an increased life expectancy. However, to obtain these benefits perioperative mortality rates need to be low.ObjectivesEvaluate 90-day and 1-year mortality after bariatric surgery in Sweden from 2008 to 2017.SettingNational quality register.MethodsData on applicable patients from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry, including 63,469 patients (85.1% gastric bypass, 12.5% sleeve gastrectomy, .8% duodenal switch, .5% minor revisions, and 1.1% other procedures), were retrieved and matched to the Cause of Death registry.ResultsDuring the 10-year period, 36 patients died within 90 days, resulting in a .06% overall mortality. The 1-year mortality rate was .19% (n = 111). Both mortality rates decreased over the study period. In a multivariate analysis, depression (odds ratio [OR] 2.38, [95% confidence interval 1.48–3.84]), leakage (OR 9.32 [4.85–17.94]), and thromboembolic events (OR 7.60 [1.63–35.37]) increased mortality risks at both 90 days and 1 year, whereas age (OR 1.03 [1.01–1.06] per increased year of age) and abdominal circumference (OR 1.03 [1.01–1.05] per cm) were also associated with increased mortality at 1 year. The predictive value of the Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score was confirmed.ConclusionsThe low 90-day and 1-year mortality, .06% and .19%, respectively, demonstrates that bariatric surgery in Sweden is safe. The use of antidepressants and 2 serious postoperative complications were the most significant risk factors for early deaths, while increased age and preoperative abdominal circumference also contributed at 1 year.     

Nephrolithiasis after bariatric surgery: A comparison of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy

IntroductionLaparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is known to increase risk for calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis due to hyperoxaluria; however, nephrolithiasis rates after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are not well described. Our objective was to determine the rate of nephrolithiasis after LRYGB versus LSG.MethodsThe electronic medical records of patients who underwent LRYGB or LSG between 2001 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed.Results1,802 patients were included. Postoperative nephrolithiasis was observed in 133 (7.4%) patients, overall, and 8.12% of LRYGB (122/1503) vs. 3.68% of LSG (11/299) patients (P < 0.001). Mean time to stone formation was 2.97 ± 2.96 years. Patients with a history of UTI (OR = 2.12, 95%CI 1.41–3.18; P < 0.001) or nephrolithiasis (OR = 8.81, 95%CI 4.93–15.72; P < 0.001) were more likely to have postoperative nephrolithiasis.ConclusionThe overall incidence of symptomatic nephrolithiasis after bariatric surgery was 7.4%. Patients who underwent LRYGB had a higher incidence of nephrolithiasis versus LSG. Patients with a history of stones had the highest risk of postoperative nephrolithiasis.     

The impact of bariatric surgery on colorectal cancer risk

Obesity is considered a risk factor for different types of cancer, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Bariatric surgery has been associated with improvements in obesity-related co-morbidities and reductions in overall cancer risk. However, given the contradictory outcomes of several cohort studies, the impact of bariatric surgery on CRC risk appears controversial. Furthermore, measurement of CRC biomarkers following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has revealed hyperproliferation and increased pro-inflammatory gene expression in the rectal mucosa. The proposed mechanisms leading to increased CRC risk are alterations of the gut microbiota and exposure of the colorectum to high concentrations of bile acids, both of which are caused by RYGB-induced anatomical rearrangements. Studies in animals and humans have highlighted the similarities between RYGB-induced microbial profiles and the gut microbiota documented in CRC. Microbial alterations common to post-RYGB cases and CRC include the enrichment of pro-inflammatory microbes and reduction in butyrate-producing bacteria. Lower concentrations of butyrate following RYGB may also contribute to an increased risk of CRC, given the anti-inflammatory and anticarcinogenic properties of this molecule. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy appears to have a more moderate impact than RYGB; however, relatively few animal and human studies have investigated its effects on CRC risk. Moreover, evidence regarding the impact of anastomosis gastric bypass on one is even more limited. Therefore, further studies are required to establish whether the potential increase in CRC risk is restricted to RYGB or may also be associated with other bariatric procedures.     

Surgeon and hospital volume outcomes in bariatric surgery: a population-level study

BackgroundOutcomes after bariatric surgery are tied to surgical volume; however, this relationship is not clearly established for each procedure.ObjectivesTo evaluate the impact of surgeon/hospital volumes on morbidity after bariatric surgery and identify volume cutoffs.SettingMulti-centric population-level study, province of Quebec, Canada.MethodsWe studied a population-based cohort of all morbidly obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery in Quebec, Canada during 2006 to 2012. We evaluated only the most common procedures in North America, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Multilevel, cross-classified logistic regressions were used to test the effects of annual surgeon volume (SV) and hospital volume (HV) on a composite 90-day postoperative outcome. Receiver operator curve was used to identify volume thresholds.ResultsOverall, 821 patients had RYGB and 1802 underwent SG by 34 surgeons in 15 centers. For RYGB, 10-case increase in SV was associated with adjusted odds ratio of .82 (95% confidence interval: .71–.94). Similar increase in HV resulted in odds ratio of .86 (95% confidence interval: .77–.96). Annual SV threshold of 21 RYGBs and HV of 25 cases were identified (area under the curve = .60 and .61, respectively). For SV, being in the higher volume category translated into an absolute risk reduction of 12.5% for 90-day major morbidity. For SG, annual 10-case increase in SV and HV was not significantly associated with a decrease in 90-day postoperative morbidity.ConclusionSV and HV are significant independent predictors of 90-day major morbidity after RYGB. This study further supports establishing minimum surgical volume requirements for more complex anastomotic procedures like RYGB. However, the role of volume targets in SG remains unclear.     

Postoperative pneumonia after bariatric surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study

BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, surgical centers had to weigh the benefits and risks of conducting bariatric surgery. Obesity increases the risk of developing severe COVID-19 infections, and therefore, bariatric surgery is beneficial. In contrast, surgical patients who test positive for COVID-19 have higher mortality rates.ObjectiveThis study investigates the national prevalence of postoperative pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic in the bariatric surgery population.SettingThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) database.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study using the ACS-NSQIP database. The population of concern included patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures. Information was extracted on rate of postoperative pneumonia and other 30-day complications between 2018 and 2020.ResultsAll baseline characteristics were similar among patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2018 and 2020. However, there was a 156% increase in postoperative pneumonia in 2020 compared with the previous year. Furthermore, despite the similar postoperative complication rates across the years, there was a statistically significant increase in all-cause mortality in 2020. The multivariate analysis showed that having surgery in 2020 was a statistically significant risk factor for pneumonia development postoperatively.ConclusionsThis study showed a statistically significant increase in the prevalence of postoperative pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic among bariatric surgery patients. Surgical centers must continuously evaluate the risks associated with healthcare-associated exposure to COVID-19 and weigh the benefits of bariatric surgery.     

Risk factors for postoperative bleeding in bariatric surgery

BackgroundPostoperative bleeding remains a relatively common complication following bariatric surgery and may lead to morbidity and even mortality.ObjectiveTo develop a prediction model to identify patients at risk for postoperative bleeding.SettingRode Kruis Ziekenhuis, Beverwijk, the Netherlands. Based on Dutch nationwide obesity audit data.MethodsPatients undergoing primary bariatric surgery were selected from January 2015 to December 2020 from the Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity. The primary outcome was postoperative bleeding within 30 days. Assessed predictors included patient factors and operative data. A prediction model was developed using backward stepwise logistic regression. Internal validation was performed using bootstrapping techniques.ResultsA total of 59,055 patients were included; 13,399 underwent a sleeve gastrectomy, and 45,656 underwent a gastric bypass procedure. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 1.5%. The following predictors were identified: male patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21–1.63), patients >45 years of age (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.29–1.76), body mass index <40 kg/m² (OR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.06–1.41), cardiovascular disease (OR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.17–1.57), and sleeve gastrectomy (OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.24–1.67). Area under the curve for the model was .612. Following bootstrapping for internal validation, a correction of .9817 was applied.ConclusionA clinical decision rule was designed to assess the risk of postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. If 3 or more risk factors are present, there is an increased risk for postoperative bleeding. The model can aid in clinical decision-making: implementing extra preventative measures in high-risk patients. External validation is needed to further develop the model.     

Postoperative sepsis after primary bariatric surgery: an analysis of MBSAQIP

BackgroundIdentifying patients at higher risk of postoperative sepsis (PS) may help to prevent this life-threatening complication.ObjectivesThis study aimed to identify the rate and predictors of PS after primary bariatric surgery.SettingAn analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) 2015-2017.MethodsPatients undergoing elective sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were included. Exclusion criteria were revisional, endoscopic, and uncommon, or investigational procedures. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of organ/space surgical site infection (OS-SSI), and patients who developed sepsis were compared with patients who did not develop sepsis in each cohort. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of PS.ResultsIn total, 438,752 patients were included (79.4% female, mean age 44.6±12 years). Of those, 661 patients (.2%) developed PS of which 245 (37.1%) developed septic shock. Out of 892 patients with organ/space surgical site infections (OS-SSI), 298 (45.1%) developed sepsis (P <.001). Patients who developed PS had higher mortality (8.8% versus .1%, P < .001), and this was highest in patients without OS-SSI (11.8% versus 5%, P = .002). The main infectious complications associated with PS in patients without OS-SSI were pneumonia and urinary tract infection. Independent predictors of PS in OS-SSI included RYGB versus SG (OR, 1.8), and age ≥50 years (OR, 1.4). Independent predictors of PS in patients without OS-SSI were conversion to other approaches (OR, 6), operation length >2 hours (OR, 5.7), preoperative dialysis (OR, 4.1), preoperative therapeutic anticoagulation (OR, 2.8), limited ambulation most or all of the time (OR, 2.4), preoperative venous stasis (OR, 2.4), previous nonbariatric foregut surgery (OR, 2), RYGB versus SG (OR, 2), hypertension on medication (OR, 1.5), body mass index ≥50 kg/m²(OR, 1.4), age ≥50 years (OR, 1.3), obstructive sleep apnea (OR, 1.3).ConclusionDevelopment of OS-SSI after primary bariatric surgery is associated with sepsis and increased 30-day mortality. Patients without OS-SSI who develop PS have a significantly higher mortality rate compared with patients with OS-SSI who develop PS. Early identification and intervention in patients with PS, including those without OS-SSI, may improve survival in this high-risk group.     

30-day Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) after elective bariatric surgery: the development and validation of the Bari-MACE clinical predictive tool

BackgroundMajor adverse cardiac events (MACEs) after bariatric surgery are poorly understood yet are thought to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality.ObjectivesTo evaluate the prevalence and clinical impact of short-term, 30-day MACE and to develop a pragmatic clinical predictive MACE scoring tool.SettingThis retrospective study was conducted using all the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP)–accredited center data from 2015 to 2019.MethodsPrimary Roux-en-Y and sleeve gastrectomy procedures were included, and prior revisional surgeries and emergency surgeries were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to examine the risk factors associated with 30-day MACE. Using forward regression, a Bari-MACE clinical prediction model was generated.ResultsA total of 750,498 patients were included in our analysis of which 959 (.1%) experienced a MACE. MACE patients were older (54.0 ± 11.5 yr versus 44.4 ± 12.0 yr, P < .0001), and comprised a higher proportion of males (36.3% versus 20.4%, P < .0001) and patients of White racial status (74.0% versus 71.6%, P < .0001). The MACE cohort also had a higher body mass index (46.6 ± 9.7 kg/m² versus 45.2 ± 7.8 kg/m², P < .0001), higher rates of sleep apnea (56.8% versus 38.2%, P < .0001), and a higher proportion of insulin-dependent diabetes (26.1% versus 8.4%, P < .0001) than non-MACE patients. Derivation of our clinical predictive Bari-MACE scoring model revealed 12 variables associated with development of MACE with a specificity of 97.8% using a 55-point threshold.ConclusionThirty-day major adverse cardiac events after elective bariatric surgery are rare, occurring in approximately .1% of all patients, but are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Using the MBSAQIP, we developed a Bari-MACE clinical predictive tool to risk-stratify patients with the aim to better guide perioperative care and foster improved surgical outcomes.     

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on bariatric surgery in North America: a retrospective analysis of 834,647 patients

BackgroundCOVID-19 has transformed surgical care, yet little is known regarding implications for bariatric surgery.ObjectiveWe sought to characterize the effect of COVID-19 on bariatric surgery delivery and outcomes.SettingThe Metabolic and Bariatric Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) collects data from 885 centers in North America.MethodsThe MBSAQIP database was evaluated with 2 cohorts described: the COVID-19 and the pre–COVID-19, with patients receiving surgery in 2020 and 2015–2019, respectively. Yearly operative trends were characterized, and bivariate analysis compared demographics and postoperative outcomes. Multivariable modeling evaluated 30-day readmission, reintervention, and reoperation rates and factors associated with undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.ResultsWe evaluated 834,647 patients, with 155,830 undergoing bariatric surgery during the 2020 pandemic year. A 12.1% reduction in total cases (177,208 in 2019 versus 155,830 in 2020; P < .001) and 13.8% reduction in cases per center occurred (204.2 cases per center in 2019 versus 176.1 cases per center in 2020; P < .001). Patients receiving bariatric surgery during the pandemic were younger and had fewer co-morbidities. Use of sleeve gastrectomy increased (74.5% versus 72.5%; P < .001), and surgery during COVID-19 was associated with reduced Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure selection (odds ratio = .83; 95% CI: .82–.84; P < .001). Length of stay decreased significantly (1.4 ± 1.4 days versus 1.6 ± 1.4 days; P < .001), yet postoperative outcomes were similar. After adjusting for co-morbidities, patients during COVID-19 had decreased 30-day odds of readmission and reintervention and a small increase in odds of reoperation.ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic dramatically changed bariatric surgery delivery. Further studies evaluating the long-term effects of these changes are warranted.     

Portomesentric and splenic vein thrombosis (PMSVT) after bariatric surgery: a systematic review of 110 patients

Background

Portomesenteric and splenic vein thrombosis (PMSVT) is a rare but potentially serious complication after bariatric surgery. No study has systematically analyzed its incidence and risk factors.

Factors implicated in discharge disposition following elective bariatric surgery

BackgroundCurrent bariatric surgery studies have focused on traditional outcomes such as mortality and morbidity and have thus far have neglected an important marker of surgical care- discharge destination.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to 1) characterize the prevalence of and clinical characteristics of patients who undergo bariatric surgery with respect to discharge disposition and to 2) evaluate factors which predict alternate care facility (ACF) discharge.SettingParticipating Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) centers.MethodsData was extracted from the MBSAQIP data registry from 2015 to 2018. All primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) procedures were included while prior revisional surgeries and emergency surgeries were excluded. Our primary objective was to characterize the prevalence of and clinical characteristics of patients who undergo bariatric surgery and are discharged to an alternate care facility (ACF). Our secondary outcome was to identify predictors of discharge to an ACF using multivariable logistic regression modeling.ResultsMost patients (n = 588,256; 99.6%) were discharged home while only a small proportion were discharged to an ACF (n = 1502; .4%). Patients discharged to an ACF were older (51.5 ± 13.5 yr versus 44.4 ± 12.0 yr; P < .0001), of increased body mass index (49.7 ± 11.9 kg/m² versus 45.3 ± 7.8 kg/m²; P < .0001), and more likely to be of male sex (26.8% versus 20.4%; P < .0001). Patients with hypertension (65.2% versus 47.9%; P < .0001), dyslipidemia (40.1% versus 23.7%; P < .0001), sleep apnea (52.7% versus 38.1%; P < .0001), and medication-dependent diabetes (39.5% versus 26.3%; P < .0001) were more likely to be discharged to an ACF. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that partially dependent and dependent functional status were the single greatest preoperative predictors of ACF discharge with an 8- and 7-fold respective increase in odds of ACF versus patients of independent functional status.ConclusionImpaired functional status was the single greatest independent preoperative predictor of ACF discharge, providing evidence against the current use of a strict age cut-off criteria and support for implementation of a more patient-centered functional approach in selection of surgical candidates.     

The effect of bariatric surgery on hypothyroidism: Sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass

Background

Hypothyroidism is prevalent in morbidly obese patients and may improve after a weight reduction surgery.

Determining the incidence of postbariatric surgery emergency department utilization: an analysis of a statewide insurance database

BackgroundPrior studies have found rates of emergency department (ED) visits after bariatric surgery approach 15% with the majority (>60%) not requiring admission. The timeframe for which ED utilization remains elevated postoperatively remains unknown. We hypothesize that ED utilization following bariatric surgery remains elevated for months after surgery with the majority of visits not requiring admission.ObjectiveNo study has determined the impact bariatric surgery has on health care resource utilization in the two years following surgery. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency of ED visitation in the 2 years following bariatric surgery.SettingsDatabase study, single state-wide insurance database.MethodsWe queried the Colorado All Payers Claim Database. Patients with data 1 year before and 2 years after surgery were included. Primary outcomes of interest were ED visits or readmissions during the 2-year period. Bariatric surgeries were identified using CPT codes. Diagnoses for an ED visit or readmission were determined by ICD codes.ResultsA total of 5399 patients underwent bariatric surgery from January 2013–November 2017. Of these, 59% underwent sleeve gastrectomy, 38% Roux-en-Y, 2% gastric band, and 1% another surgery. Median age was 44 (IQR 35–54) years, and 82% were female. Overall, 3103 patients (57%) visited the ED at least once with a total of 12,988 visits, 1267 of which (9.8%) resulted in admission. ED use was highest in the 30 days following surgery (17%) but remained above presurgery baseline for 8 months (7.4% at 8 mo compared with baseline mean 6.4% [95% CI 6.0%–6.8%]).ConclusionsED visits remain elevated for 8 months post bariatric surgery with over 90% of visits not requiring an admission. Interventions that prevent emergency department utilization should be key focus of quality improvement projects to limit health care resource utilization following bariatric surgery.     

The risk of inflammatory bowel disease after bariatric surgery

BackgroundThe association between bariatric surgery and new onset of inflammatory bowel disease has so far only been sparsely studied and with conflicting results.ObjectivesTo investigate the association between bariatric surgery and inflammatory bowel disease in a large population-based cohort.SettingNationwide in Sweden.MethodsThis population-based retrospective cohort study included Swedish individuals registered in the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry who underwent primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy during 2007–2018. Ten control individuals from the general population were matched according to age, sex, and region of residence at time of exposure. The study population was followed until 2019 with regard to the development of inflammatory bowel disease. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare disease-free survival time between subgroups and control individuals for each outcome.ResultsThe final cohort consisted of 64,188 exposed individuals with a total follow-up of 346,860 person-years and 634,530 controls with total follow-up of 3,444,186 person-years. Individuals who underwent Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass had an increased risk of later development of Crohn’s disease (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8, 95% CI 1.5–2.2) and unclassified inflammatory bowel disease (HR 2.7, 95% CI 2.0–3.7) but not ulcerative colitis (HR .9, 95% CI .8–1.1) compared with control individuals, whereas individuals who underwent sleeve gastrectomy had an increased risk of ulcerative colitis (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1–3.1) but not Crohn’s disease (HR .8, 95% CI .3–2.1) and unclassified inflammatory bowel disease (HR 2.5, 95% CI .8–7.8).ConclusionsRoux-en-Y gastric bypass was associated with increased risk of Crohn’s disease and unclassified inflammatory bowel disease, whereas sleeve gastrectomy was associated with increased risk of ulcerative colitis only.     

Weight regain after bariatric surgery: a systematic literature review and comparison across studies using a large reference sample

Published estimates of weight regain (WR) after bariatric surgery vary greatly. Understanding the sources of variability in the literature and clarifying the magnitude of WR after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are critical for informing expectations and planning interventions. A literature search through January 2019 yielded 15 English-language studies that reported WR in at least 30 participants, not selected based on weight loss or WR, at least 3 years after primary RYGB (n = 11) or SG (n = 5). Median follow-up was 5.0 (range, 3.2–10.0) years. Median sample size was 62 (range, 33–464). Samples represented a median of 54.3% (range, 10.7%–100%) of eligible participants. Nadir weight was determined by serial research assessments (n = 1), medical records (n = 7), participant recall (n = 4), or an undisclosed method (n = 4). Three continuous and 8 binary WR measures (the latter, based on various thresholds for clinically meaningful WR) were reported. To enable comparison across studies, the percentage difference in WR in each study versus a reference sample (n = 1433 RYGB), matched on time since surgery and WR measure, was calculated. Median WR in the reference sample increased from 8.2 (25th–75th percentile: 0–19.5) to 23.8 (25th–75th percentile: 9.0–33.9) percent of maximum weight lost, 3 to 6 years post RYGB surgery. Studies of RYGB versus SG, with larger versus smaller samples, with higher versus lower participation rates, that determined nadir weight via participant recall versus medical records, and reported continuous versus binary WR measures tended to have WR values closer to the reference sample and each other. Variation in WR estimates was explained by heterogeneity in WR measures, timing of assessment, surgical procedure, and study design characteristics. The best estimate of WR after RYGB likely comes from the large reference sample. WR after SG versus RYGB appears higher. However, additional high-quality studies with uniform reporting of WR by surgical procedure are needed.     

Early postoperative complications after gastric bypass revisional surgery in patients with previous sleeve gastrectomy versus primary gastric bypass

BackgroundRevisional bariatric surgery (RS) is indicated if there is weight regain or insufficient weight loss, no improvement or reappearance of co-morbidities, or previous bariatric surgery complications. It has been associated with higher postoperative morbidity.ObjectiveTo evaluate the early postoperative complications (<30 d) of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass RS (RYGB-RS) after primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG-1) compared with primary RYGB (RYGB-1) at a bariatric surgery referral center.SettingDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery of General Universitary Hospital of Alicante, Spain.MethodsRetrospective cohort study comparing RYGB-RS after SG-1 and RYGB-1 between January 2008 and March 2021. Postoperative complications, hospital stay, mortality, and readmissions were analyzed.ResultsSix hundred and twenty-eight RYGB surgeries (48 RYGB-RS, 580 RYGB-1) were studied. The mean age of patients undergoing RYGB-RS was 50 years, compared with 46 years in the RYGB-1 group (P = .017). Mean initial body mass index was 44.2 kg/m² (RYGB-RS) versus 47.6 kg/m² (RYGB-1; P = .004). Cardiovascular risk factors were higher in the RYGB-1 group (P < .05). Indications for RS were weight regain or insufficient weight loss (72.9%), weight regain or insufficient weight loss plus gastroesophageal reflux disease (14.6%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (12.5%). There were no differences in the frequency of complications (RYGB-RS 22.9% vs RYGB-1 20.5%) or in their severity (Clavien–Dindo ≥IIIa; RYGB-RS 10.4% vs RYGB-1 6.4%; P > .05). There were no differences in emergency room visits (RYGB-RS at 12.5% vs RYGB-1 at 14.9%) or in readmissions (RYGB-RS at 12.5% vs RYGB-1 at 9.4%).ConclusionNo differences were observed between primary RYGB and revisional RYGB in early morbidity, mortality, emergencies, or readmissions. Revisional bariatric surgery is a safe procedure at referral centers and must be done by expert hands.