Comparison of one-anastomosis gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for treatment of obesity: a 5-year study

BackgroundRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the gold standard in bariatric surgery. One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has been reported to have equivalent or better weight loss, with added advantages of being technically easy, amenable to reintervention/reversal, and offering better food tolerance.ObjectiveThis study was undertaken to compare weight loss, metabolic syndrome outcome, complications, and long-term nutritional outcomes between the 2 procedures.SettingsA high-volume, private-practice bariatric surgery center in India.MethodThis retrospective study is based on prospectively maintained data in a cohort of patients who had either RYGB or OAGB in 2012 at a single institution by a single surgeon. Patients were all eligible for 5-year follow-up.ResultsOn hundred twenty-two patients had RYGB and 90 had OAGB. The mean age was 44 and 46.4 years, body mass index was 45.8 and 42, percentage of total weight loss was 36.4 and 25.9, and percentage of excess weight loss was 81.6 and 66.7 for OAGB and RYGB groups, respectively. Resolution of type 2 diabetes was 79%, hypertension 57%, dyslipidemia 56%, and sleep apnea 94.54% in OAGB patients compared with type 2 diabetes of 61%, hypertension of 43%, dyslipidemia of 53%, and sleep apnea of 90.74% in RYGB patients. OAGB patients had more nutritional deficiencies than RYGB patients: anemia 44% versus 17%, hypoalbuminemia 32% versus 15%, and hypocalcemia 19% versus 8%, and other complications 7.8% versus 1.6%, respectively. There were no deaths in this study.ConclusionOAGB is associated with more weight loss and better resolution of co-morbid conditions. However, it is also associated with more nutritional deficiencies. There is a need for long-term follow-up and multicenter reports to confirm these findings.     

Metabolic comparison of one-anastomosis gastric bypass,single-anastomosis duodenal-switch,Roux-en-Y gastric bypass,and vertical sleeve gastrectomy in rat

Background

One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and single-anastomosis duodenal switch (SADS) have become increasingly popular weight loss strategies. However, data directly comparing the effectiveness of these procedures with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and vertical sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are limited.

Ten-year outcome of one-anastomosis gastric bypass with a biliopancreatic limb of 150 cm versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a single-institution series of 940 patients

BackgroundLong-term outcomes of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) need to be compared with those of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).ObjectiveThe present study evaluates the long-term outcomes at 10-year follow-up of OAGB with a biliopancreatic limb of 150 cm versus RYGB.SettingPrivate practice, France.MethodsData of patients who underwent OAGB or RYGB as primary or secondary procedures between 2010 and 2011 at a referral center were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively.ResultsA total of 940 patients underwent OAGB (n = 405) or RYGB (n = 535). Operative time was significantly shorter in the OAGB group. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 17.2% of patients after RYGB versus 8.1% after OAGB (P ≤ .0001). Patients in the RYGB group had a significantly higher rate of kinking of the jejuno-jejunal anastomosis, stenosis of the gastrojejunal anastomosis, and dysphagia for early ulcers. At long term, no differences were found in the rate of severe malnutrition. Cumulated morbidity was significantly higher after RYGB, with higher incidence of internal hernia, anastomotic ulcer, blind-loop syndrome, and hypoglycemia. Conversion to RYGB and laparoscopic exploration for chronic pain were more frequent after OAGB. Surgery for weight regain was significantly more frequent after RYGB. Patients in the OAGB group had significantly lower weight, body mass index, and greater percentage excess, and total weight losses at 120 months. No significant differences were detected in co-morbidity outcomes.ConclusionAfter 10 years, both RYGB and OAGB are effective procedures. However, OAGB is associated with shorter operative times and better results in short- and long-term morbidity and weight loss outcomes.     

Conversion of one-anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: short-term results from a tertiary referral center

BackgroundOne-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), also known as minigastric bypass, is an increasingly popular bariatric surgery option worldwide. While OAGB offers advantage in terms of procedure time and technical ease, revisional operations to correct complications may be necessary.ObjectivesWe aimed to describe the indications and perioperative outcomes for OAGB conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) at a single-referral center.SettingAcademic hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.MethodsAll patients undergoing conversion from OAGB to RYGB from February 2016 through September 2018 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database of revisional bariatric surgeries.ResultsSixteen patients underwent conversion from previous OAGB to RYGB during the study period. The cohort was 62.5% female (n = 10) with a mean age of 40.2 years and median body mass index of 30.7 kg/m². Indications for conversion included intractable nausea/vomiting (n = 8, 50.0%), biliary reflux (n = 3, 18.8%), weight recidivism (n = 3, 18.8%), and protein-calorie malnutrition (n = 2, 12.5%). Twelve cases (75.0%) were successfully completed with a laparoscopic approach, with 4 cases (25.0%) converted to open. The median length of stay was 5.5 days. Six patients (37.5%) experienced minor and major complications within 30 days of discharge. Fourteen patients (87.5%) were available for follow-up at 6 months, with 100% of these patients reporting resolution of their preoperative symptoms. There were no mortalities.ConclusionsData from this largest reported single-center experience demonstrates that conversion of OAGB to RYGB is safe and technically feasible. Further studies and longer-term follow-up are needed to definitively describe outcomes after this revisional bariatric surgery.     

Decreased visceral fat area correlates with improved total testosterone levels after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in obese Chinese males with type 2 diabetes: a 12-month follow-up

Background

Obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are recognized as risk factors for hypogonadism in males. Serum sex hormone profiles have not been assessed adequately in obese Chinese males with T2D who have undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

Conversion of gastric sleeve to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: overall outcomes and predictors of below-average weight loss

BackgroundConversion of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been utilized to promote further weight loss, but results are variable in available literature.ObjectivesTo evaluate outcomes of SG to RYGB conversion for weight loss and to identify predictors of below-average weight loss.SettingUniversity-affiliated hospital, United States.MethodsChart review was performed of our patients who underwent SG to RYGB conversion from November 1, 2013, to November 1, 2020. Primary outcomes were below-average percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 and 2 years. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for preconversion demographics to evaluate their relationship to the primary outcome.ResultsSixty-two patients underwent conversion from SG to RYGB with weight loss as a goal. One-year data was available for 47 patients. The average %EWL at 1 year was 41.5%. Twenty-six patients had below-average %EWL at 1 year. Interval to conversion <2 years (OR = 4.41, 95% CI [1.28,15.17], P = .019) and preconversion body mass index (BMI) >40 (OR = 4.00, 95% CI [1.17,13.73], P = .028) were statistically significant predictors of below-average 1-year %EWL. Two-year data was available for 36 patients. The average %EWL at 2 years was 30.8%. Seventeen patients had below-average %EWL at 2 years. Evaluated demographics were not statistically significant predictors of below-average 2-year %EWL.ConclusionsFollowing SG to RYGB conversion, %EWL outcomes are lower at 1 year (41.5%) and 2 years (30.8%) than reported values for primary RYGB. Interval to conversion <2 years and preconversion BMI >40 are predictors of below-average 1-year weight loss after conversion.     

The influence of the percentage of the common limb in weight loss and nutritional alterations after laparoscopic gastric bypass

BackgroundRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered the gold standard for the treatment of morbid obesity. There is no consensus over ideal limb length when the bypass is created and published studies do not take into account the influence of the common limb (CL) on weight loss. The objective was to study the influence of the common limb after RYGB. The setting was the Virgen de la Arrixaca University Clinical Hospital in Murcia, Spain.Material and MethodsThis prospective study includes 151 patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGB surgery for morbid obesity. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to their body mass index. The small intestine (SI) was measured using micro forceps so that the percentage of common limb (%CL) could then be compared against the total SI in each patient. The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) in relation to the %CL was calculated at 3, 12, and 24 months. A series of tests was conducted simultaneously to analyze nutritional deficiencies and their relation to the %CL.ResultsThe total jejunoileal segment and the %CL in the groups of both obese and super-obese patients had no influence on the %EWL in either group for any of the periods studied. The patients with a %CL<50% had greater nutritional deficiencies in the follow-up period and required supplements and more frequent laboratory tests.ConclusionsThe %CL has no effect on weight loss in RYGB patients. A lower %CL is related to greater nutritional deficiencies.     

Conversion from one-anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: when and why—a single-center experience of all consecutive OAGB procedures

BackgroundOne-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a well-established treatment method in patients with morbid obesity. Its long-term impact on de novo reflux, anastomotic complications, and malnutrition needs further evaluation. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a technically feasible procedure in revisional bariatric surgery. This study presents our institutional data on conversion from OAGB to RYGB.ObjectiveTo determine the reasons for conversion, preoperative endoscopic findings, and feasibility of revisional bariatric surgery after OAGB.SettingUniversity hospital in AustriaMethodsRetrospective analysis of a prospectively fed database. All patients undergoing OAGB between January 2012 and December 2019 were included. Screening was carried out for all patients needing conversion to RYGB. Percent total weight loss, percent excess weight loss, time to conversion, postoperative complications, and reasons for conversion were assessed.ResultsEighty-two of 1,025 patients who underwent OAGB were converted laparoscopically to RYGB. Seven patients were converted early because of anastomotic/gastric tube leakage. Median time to late conversion was 29.1 ± 24.3 months, mean percent excess weight loss was 86.6% ± 33.1% and percent total weight loss was 35.1% ± 13.5%. Forty-two patients were converted because of reflux, 11 because of persistent marginal ulcers, 10 because of anastomotic stenosis, 9 because of malnutrition, and 3 because of weight regain. Seven patients showed Barrett’s metaplasia in biopsies at the gastroesophageal junction before conversion.ConclusionLaparoscopic conversion from OAGB to RYGB is technically feasible with a moderate rate of postoperative complications. Severe (bile) reflux is a serious long-term complication after OAGB, with 4.1% of patients needing conversion to RYGB. Endoscopy after OAGB in patients showing clinical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease is strongly advised to detect underlying pathologic changes.     

Short- to medium-term results of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass compared with one-anastomosis gastric bypass for weight recidivism after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

BackgroundSingle-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) and the one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are 2 revisional procedures to address the problem of weight recidivism after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of SADI and OAGB as revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) in initially super-obese patients (body mass index [BMI] >50 kg/m²).SettingAcademic hospital, bariatric center of excellence, Germany.MethodsObservational study of outcomes in 84 initially super-obese patients who had undergone RBS after LSG (SADI n = 42, OAGB n = 42) between July 2013 and April 2018. Follow-up examinations were performed at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after RBS. The variables analyzed included time between LSG and RBS, BMI, excess weight loss, total weight loss, operation time, and complications.ResultsThe time interval between LSG and RBS was 45.5 ± 22.8 and 43.5 ± 24.2 months for SADI and OAGB, respectively. At the time of RBS, the mean BMI was 42.8 ± 7.9 kg/m² for SADI and 43.4 ± 9.2 kg/m² for OAGB. The follow-up examinations rates (%) after SADI were 97.6, 92.8, 90.5, 78.6, 57.1, and 100, 97.6, 95.2, 85.7, and 59.5 after OAGB. The BMI at the follow-up examinations were 39.1 ± 7.2, 34.2 ± 6.9, 31.2 ± 5.8, 30.2 ± 5.3, 29.3 ± 5.1 for SADI, and 39.5 ± 8.1, 36.6 ± 7.4, 34.7 ± 7.9, 32.9 ± 6.3, and 31.6 ± 5.9 for OAGB. The mean operating times for SADI and OAGB were 138 ± 40 and 123 ± 39 minutes, respectively. Three patients in the SADI group and 1 patient in the OAGB group developed a major complication within the first 30 postoperative days.ConclusionSADI and OAGB were effective second-step procedures for further weight reduction after LSG in initially super-obese patients after short to medium follow-up. There was a trend toward higher weight loss for SADI though this did not reach statistical significance. Substantial differences concerning surgery time and complications between the 2 procedures were not observed.     

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: nationwide data from the Danish quality registry for treatment of severe obesity

BackgroundBariatric surgery as treatment of obesity is increasing worldwide. No guidelines exist on which type of bariatric procedure to choose for the individual patient.ObjectivesThis study aims to compare Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with respect to weight loss, complications, comorbidities, and quality of life.SettingA nationwide multi-center register-based cohort study.MethodsWe identified 16,053 patients treated by bariatric surgery from 2008 to 2021 (RYGB, n = 13,075; SG, n = 2978) from the Danish quality registry for treatment of severe obesity (DBSO). We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and prevalence ratios (PRs) comparing surgical complications, weight loss, and medical comorbidities by type of procedure up to 2 years after surgery.ResultsPatients treated with RYGB experienced a greater weight loss than patients treated by SG both after 1 year (PR, .53; 95% confidence interval [CI], .48–.58) and 2 years (PR, .46; 95% CI, .39–.54). Compared with RYGB, SG yielded a lower risk of readmission (RR, .71; 95% CI, .60–.85). Likewise, the risk of reoperation between 30 days and 1 year (RR, .40; 95% CI, .30–.53) and 1 and 5 years (RR, .15; 95% CI, .12–.20]) were lower following SG. At 1-year follow-up, 76% of patients treated with RYGB and 63% of patients treated with SG experienced diabetes remission. Ten percent and 61% of patients were lost to follow-up after 1 and 2 years, respectively.ConclusionThe DBSO is an important resource in studying treatment of severe obesity. Weight loss is slightly greater after RYGB than after SG, but RYGB is associated with more frequent readmissions and reoperations.     

One-year weight loss after primary or revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for failed adjustable gastric banding

BackgroundAdjustable gastric banding has been widely used in Europe, but recently gastric bypass (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB]) has become the procedure of choice. With a gastric banding failure rate of nearly 40% at 5 years, the need for revisional surgery is increasing. The effect of a failed previous bariatric surgery on the weight loss curve after RYGB is still a controversial issue.MethodsA total of 259 patients underwent RYGB from 2003 to 2007, 58 after failed gastric banding and 201 as primary surgery. All the procedures were laparoscopically performed by the same surgeon at a single institution. The postoperative course and the percentage of excess weight loss were compared between the 2 groups.ResultsThe 2 groups were similar in age and initial body mass index (46.3 ± 7.2 kg/m² for revision versus 47.7 ± 6.7 kg/m² for primary RYGB). In contrast, the prerevision body mass index was 43.2 ± 7.0 kg/m². Revisional RYGB required a significantly longer operative time (128.3 ± 25.9 minutes versus 89.0 ± 14.7 minutes, P <.0001) and the morbidity was greater (8.6% versus 5.5%), but no patient died in the postoperative period after revision. As determined from the initial body mass index, the 1-year percentage of excess weight loss was comparable between the 2 groups (66.1% ± 26.8% and 70.4% ± 18.9%).ConclusionWhen RYGB is performed after an adjustable gastric band failure to restore weight loss or because of a complication, the weight loss curve is similar to that after primary RYGB. Therefore, the strategy of adjustable gastric banding first is an option that does not seem to preclude satisfactory weight loss after revision to RYGB.     

Bariatric revisional surgery for gastrogastric fistula following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass positively impacts weight loss

BackgroundGastrogastric fistula (GGF) is a rare complication from Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). It is a known risk factor associated with weight recidivism and an indication for Bariatric Revisional Surgery (BRS).ObjectivesThe primary outcome of this study is to evaluate perioperative outcomes and the long-term total body weight loss (TBWL) outcomes following revision.SettingSingle Academic Institution, Center of Bariatric Excellence.MethodsWe selected patients who had primary bariatric surgery and BRS from 2003 to 2020, followed by BRS for GGF. Patients’ demographics, perioperative outcomes, and TBWL were analyzed.ResultsOne hundred five patients underwent BRS for GGF. Mean body mass index (BMI) at index operation and revision was 51.6 ± 10.1, and 42.4 ± 11.2 respectively. Ninety percent of patients had open primary RYGB, and 69% had open revisional surgery. The median length of stay after BRS was 3 days. The 30-day reintervention rate was 19%. The 30-day readmission rate was 34%. Of the 77 patients included for weight loss analysis, the mean %TBWL after primary RYGB was 34% ± 14. The total mean %TBWL at the time of revision was 18.8%, translating into a weight regain of 13.6% ± 9.5. The total mean %TBWL after revision was 37.6% ± 11.4, translating into TBWL of 18.8% ± 9.4 after revision when compared to TBWL at revision time.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that revision for GGF can be safely performed, however is associated with higher morbidity than primary bariatric surgery. Revision for GGF results in significant long-term weight loss.     

The role of total alimentary limb length in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review

BackgroundRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an established surgical treatment for obesity. Variations in limb length during RYGB procedures have been investigated for optimizing weight loss while minimizing nutritional deficiencies. The role of the total alimentary limb length (TALL; Roux limb plus common channel [CC]), however, is poorly defined.ObjectiveCompare TALL in RYGB procedures for weight loss outcomes and malnutrition.SettingSystematic review.MethodsOvid Medline and PubMed databases were searched for entries between 1993 and 2020. Search terms included “gastric bypass” and “TALL.” Two independent reviewers screened the results.ResultsA total of 21 studies measured TALL in RYGB. Of these, 4 of 6 reported a relationship between TALL and weight loss. Additionally, 11 studies reported that when TALL was ≤400 cm and CC <200 cm, 3.4% to 63.6% of patients required limb lengthening for protein malnutrition.ConclusionsThe majority of studies on RYGB do not report TALL length. There is some evidence that weight loss is affected by shortening TALL, while a TALL ≤400 cm with CC<200 should be avoided due to severe protein malnutrition. More studies on the effect of TALL are needed.     

Conversion from laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): preliminary data from a multicenter retrospective study

BackgroundLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure, while laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has been for a decade one of the most popular interventions for weight loss. After LSG and LAGB, some patients may require a second surgery due to weight regain or late complications. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a promising bariatric procedure, which provides effective long-term weight loss and has a favorable effect on type 2 diabetes.ObjectivesTo retrospectively analyze data from 10 Italian centers on conversion from LAGB and LSG to OAGB.SettingHigh-volume centers for bariatric surgery.MethodsProspectively collected data from 10 high-volume centers were retrospectively reviewed. Body mass index (BMI), percentage of excess BMI loss, reasons for redo, remission from co-morbidities (hypertension, diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux, and dyslipidemia), and major complications were recorded.ResultsThree hundred patients were included in the study; 196 patients underwent conversion from LAGB to OAGB and 104 were converted from LSG. BMI was 45.1 ± 7 kg/m² at the time of first intervention, 41.8 ± 6.3 kg/m² at redo time, and 30.5 ± 5.5 kg/m² at last follow-up appointment. Mean percentage of excess BMI loss was 13.2 ± 28.2 at conversion and 73.4 ± 27.5 after OAGB. Remission rates from hypertension, diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux, and dyslipidemia were 40%, 62.5%, 58.7% and 52%, respectively. Mean follow-up was 20.8 (range, 6–156) months and overall complications rate was 8.6%.ConclusionOur data show that OAGB is a safe and effective revisional procedure after failed restrictive bariatric surgery.     

Impact of limb length on nutritional status in one-anastomosis gastric bypass: 3-year results

BackgroundBariatric metabolic surgery is a well-established treatment option associated with significant weight loss and an improvement of metabolic co-morbidities. However, the changes in gastrointestinal anatomy frequently result in nutritional deficiencies.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of biliopancreatic limb length in one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) on micronutrient and protein deficiencies.SettingUniversity hospital, Austria.MethodsAll patients that were (1) undergoing OAGB between 2012 and 2014, and (2) had at least 3 postoperative follow-up visits were retrospectively analyzed. Systemic levels of parathyroid hormone, vitamins (A, D, E, and B12), folic acid, magnesium, calcium, iron, albumin, and ferritin were correlated to biliopancreatic limb length as follows: short limb (150 cm), intermediate limb (200 cm), and long limb (250 cm).ResultsA total of 155 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria (female/male: n = 111/44). OAGB led to a mean percent excess weight loss of 79.9 (±24.2) and a reduction of mean body mass index from 45.4 kg/m² (±6.1 kg/m²) at baseline to 30.2 kg/m² (±9.9 kg/m²). Preoperative deficiencies were seen in 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (93.8%), folic acid (27.6%), ferritin (4.1%), vitamin A (5.5%), and vitamin B12 (2.3%). In patients with long limb, systemic folic acid levels were significantly lower after 24 months postoperatively compared with short and intermediate limb (P < .05). No difference was observed for vitamin D, A, E, B12, and iron and no patient suffered from severe protein malnutrition.ConclusionNutritional deficiencies were common after OAGB without severe deficiencies in biliopancreatic limb lengths ranging from 150 to 250 cm. A trend can be observed with more pronounced deficiencies with intermediate and long limb lengths without significant differences for most micronutrients.     

Mucosal and hormonal adaptations after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive literature review regarding the relevant hormonal and histologic changes observed after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). We aimed to describe the relevant hormonal (glucagon-like peptides 1 and 2 [GLP-1 and GLP-2], peptide YY [PYY], oxyntomodulin [OXM], bile acids [BA], cholecystokinin [CCK], ghrelin, glucagon, gastric inhibitory polypeptide [GIP], and amylin) profiles, as well as the histologic (mucosal cellular) adaptations happening after patients undergo RYGB. Our review compiles the current evidence and furthers the understanding of the rationale behind the food intake regulatory adaptations occurring after RYGB surgery. We identify gaps in the literature where the potential for future investigations and therapeutics may lie. We performed a comprehensive database search without language restrictions looking for RYGB bariatric surgery outcomes in patients with pre- and postoperative blood work hormonal profiling and/or gut mucosal biopsies. We gathered the relevant study results and describe them in this review. Where human findings were lacking, we included animal model studies. The amalgamation of physiologic, metabolic, and cellular adaptations following RYGB is yet to be fully characterized. This constitutes a fundamental aspiration for enhancing and individualizing obesity therapy.     

Comparison of Short-term Safety of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in the United States: 341 cases from MBSAQIP-accredited Centers

BackgroundOne anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is the third most common (4%) primary bariatric procedure worldwide but is seldom performed in the United States and is currently under consideration for endorsement by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Evidence from the United States on safety of OAGB compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is limited.ObjectiveTo compare the short-term safety outcomes of the three primary bariatric procedures.SettingMetabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP)-accredited hospitals in the United States and Canada.MethodsUsing the 2015–2019 MBSAQIP database, we compared the safety outcomes of adult patients who underwent primary laparoscopic OAGB, RYGB, and SG. Exclusion criteria included age over 80 years, emergency operation, conversion, and incomplete follow-up. The primary outcome was 30-day overall complication. Secondary outcomes were 30-day surgical and medical complications and hospitalization length.ResultsA total of 341 patients underwent primary OAGB. Using propensity scores, we matched the OAGB cohort 1:1 with two cohorts of similar baseline characteristics who underwent RYGB and SG, respectively. The OAGB cohort had a lower overall complication rate than the RYGB cohort (6.7% versus12.3%, P = .02) and a similar rate to the SG cohort (5.0%, P = .43). The OAGB cohort had a similar rate of surgical complication to the RYGB cohort (5.0% versus 8.5%, P = .1) and a higher rate than the SG group (1.2%, P = .009). The OAGB cohort had a shorter median hospitalization than the RYGB cohort (1 d [interquartile range (IQR) 1–2 d] versus 2 d [IQR 1–2 d], P < .001) and a similar hospitalization length to the SG cohort ([1–2 d], P = .46).ConclusionUsing the largest and the most current U.S. data, this study demonstrated that the short-term safety profile of primary OAGB is acceptable, but future studies should determine the long-term safety.     

Preoperative assessment of gut hormones does not correlate to weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery

BackgroundRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery is an effective and frequently used surgical treatment for severe obesity. Postoperative weight loss varies markedly, but biomarkers to predict weight loss outcomes remain elusive. Levels of the satiety gut hormones glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY (PYY) are attenuated in obese patients but elevated after RYGB surgery. We aimed to evaluate the preoperative responses of GLP-1 and PYY to a standard meal as a predictor of weight loss after RYGB surgery. We hypothesized that weak satiety gut hormone responses preoperatively, would predict poor weight loss after RYGB surgery.MethodsPreoperatively 43 patients (F = 25/M = 18) had GLP-1 and PYY measured in the fasting state and at 30-minute intervals over 180 minutes after a standard 400 kcal mixed meal. Weight loss was assessed at weight stability after surgery (mean 16.2 mo [CI 15.516.9]).ResultsBody mass index decreased from 44.0 kg/m² (CI 42.2–45.7) before surgery to 30.3 kg/m² (CI 28.4–32.2) after surgery (P<.001). Preoperative GLP-1 and PYY responses to food intake; as delta value between fasting and maximum as well as total responses during 180 minutes did not correlate to total weight loss (GLP-1; rho = .060 and rho = −.089, PYY; rho = −.03 and rho = −.022, respectively) or to excess weight loss % (GLP-1; rho = .051 and rho = −.064, PYY; rho = −.1 and rho = −.088, respectively).ConclusionPreoperative responses of GLP-1 and PYY to a 400 kcal mixed meal do not correlate to postoperative weight loss after RYGB surgery for morbid obesity.     

Association between hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms after one-anastomosis/mini gastric bypass

BackgroundOne-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is an accepted bariatric and metabolic surgery with certain important complications, such as postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and bile reflux (BR), which are not well addressed in literature.ObjectivesThe present study was conducted to determine the true incidence of postoperative de novo GERD and BR and their associations with a hiatal hernia (HH).SettingThe present research setting comprised the Center of Excellence of the European Branch of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, Hazrat-e-Rasoul Hospital, Tehran, Iran.MethodsThe present cohort study recruited 200 patients with morbid obesity undergoing OAGB/minigastric bypass from December 2016 to February 2018 without any preoperative GERD symptoms. These patients were followed up for 1 year after the surgery. The incidence of post-OAGB GERD and BR was determined in all the patients using the GERD symptom questionnaire, GerdQ.ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 41.0 ± 11.6 years. A hernia was observed in 56 (29.2%) cases and GERD in 37 (19.3%). Hernia was small in 44 (22.9%) cases, medium in 11 (5.7%), and large in 1 (.5%). HH was found to be significantly correlated with GERD (P = .012).ConclusionThe important post-OAGB complications, such as GERD and BR, have not been adequately addressed in literature. The present study found moderate and large HHs to be important factors for de novo GERD and repairing a HH during OAGB may be essential for preventing GERD-like symptoms.