The Impact of Durvalumab on Local-Regional Control in Stage III NSCLCs Treated With Chemoradiation and on KEAP1-NFE2L2-Mutant Tumors

IntroductionKEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant NSCLCs are chemoradiation resistant and at high risk for local-regional failure (LRF) after concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT). To elucidate the impact of durvalumab on local-regional control, we evaluated LRF in patients with NSCLC treated with cCRT with and without durvalumab.MethodsPatients with stage III NSCLC treated with cCRT or cCRT and durvalumab who underwent tumor genomic profiling were evaluated. The incidence of LRF and outcomes of patients with and without KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors were evaluated.ResultsWe analyzed 120 consecutive patients (cCRT alone, n = 54; cCRT and durvalumab, n = 66). Patients treated with cCRT alone had significantly more LRF events compared with those treated with cCRT and durvalumab, with 12-month LRF incidence of 39% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24%–54%) and 18% (95% CI: 8%–28%), respectively (p = 0.002). Among patients treated with cCRT alone and cCRT and durvalumab, 20 patients (37%) and 18 patients (27%), respectively, had KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors. In patients treated with cCRT alone, those with KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors had worse local-regional control (p = 0.015), and on multivariate analysis, KEAP1-NFE2L2 mutation predicted for LRF (hazard ratio = 3.9, 95% CI: 1.6–9.8, p = 0.003). Nevertheless, patients with and without KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors had similar LRF outcomes (p = 0.541) when treated with cCRT and durvalumab, and mutational status did not predict for LRF (p = 0.545). Among those with KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors, cCRT and durvalumab significantly reduced the incidence of LRF compared with cCRT alone: 12-month LRF incidence of 62% (95% CI: 40%–84%) versus 25% (95% CI: 4%–46%), respectively (p = 0.021).ConclusionsDurvalumab after cCRT significantly improves local-regional control and reduces LRF in chemoradiation-resistant KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant NSCLC tumors.     

Comprehensive Analysis of TP53 and KEAP1 Mutations and Their Impact on Survival in Localized- and Advanced-Stage NSCLC

IntroductionTP53 and KEAP1 are frequently mutated in NSCLC, but their prognostic value is ambiguous, particularly in localized stage tumors.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included a total of 6297 patients with NSCLC who were diagnosed between November 1998 and February 2020. The primary end point was overall survival. Patients were diagnosed in a central pathology laboratory as part of the Network Genomic Medicine collaboration, encompassing more than 300 lung cancer-treating oncology centers in Germany. All patients underwent molecular testing, including targeted next-generation panel sequencing and in situ hybridization.ResultsA total of 6297 patients with NSCLC were analyzed. In 1518 surgically treated patients (Union for International Cancer Control [UICC] I–IIIA), truncating TP53 mutations and KEAP1 mutations were independent negative prognostic markers in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR]_{TP53truncating} = 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–1.91, p = 0.015; HR_KEAP1mut = 1.68, 95% CI:1.24–2.26, p = 0.001). Consistently, these mutations were associated with shorter disease-free survival. In 4779 patients with advanced-stage (UICC IIIB–IV) tumors, TP53 mutations did not predict outcome in univariable analysis. In contrast, KEAP1 mutations remained a negative prognostic factor (HR_KEAP1mut = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.23–1.61, p < 0.001) in patients with advanced-stage tumors. Furthermore, those with KEAP1-mutant tumors with co-occurring TP53 missense mutations had longer overall survival than those with KEAP1-mutant tumors with wild-type or truncating TP53 mutations.ConclusionsThis study found that TP53 and KEAP1 mutations were prognostic for localized and advanced-stage NSCLC. The increased relative hazard of harboring TP53 or KEAP1 mutations was comparable to an increase in one UICC stage. Our data suggest that molecular stratification on the basis of TP53 and KEAP1 mutation status should be implemented for localized and advanced-stage NSCLC to optimize and modify clinical decision-making.     

NFE2L3在非小细胞肺癌组织中的表达及其临床意义

目的:探讨核因子Ｅ２相关因子３（NFE2L3）在非小细胞肺癌组织中的表达情况及临床意义。方法:从川北医学院附属医院收集非小细胞肺癌36例(肺鳞癌)及癌旁组织,采用免疫组化方法检测NFE2L3的表达差异与临床参数的关系。结果:肺癌组织与癌旁组织的NFE2L3 阳性表达率分别为77.8%（28／36）、13.9%（5／36）,肺癌组织NFE2L3阳性表达率明显高于癌旁组织（P<0.001）。在非小细胞肺癌组织中,NFE2L3的表达水平在不同分化程度、淋巴结转移中的差异有统计学意义,而与患者年龄、性别无关（P>0.05）。结论:NFE2L3在非小细胞肺癌组织中表达量显著升高,并与转移密切相关。     

Clinicopathological,microenvironmental and genetic determinants of molecular subtypes in KEAP1/NRF2-mutant lung cancer

Somatic KEAP1-NRF2 pathway alterations are frequently detected in both lung adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas. However, the biological characteristics and molecular subtypes of KEAP1/NRF2-mutant lung cancer remain largely undefined. Here, we performed a stepwise, integrative analytic and experimental interrogation of primary tumors and cancer cell lines harboring KEAP1 or NFE2L2 (encoding NRF2) gene mutations. First, we discovered that KEAP1/NRF2-mutant lung cancer presented APOBEC-mediated mutational signatures, impaired tumor angiogenesis, elevated hypoxic stress and deficient immune-cell infiltrates. Second, gene expression-based subtyping revealed three molecular subsets of KEAP1/NRF2-mutant lung adenocarcinomas and two molecular subsets of KEAP1/NRF2-mutant lung squamous cell carcinomas, each associated with distinguishing genetic, differentiation, immunological and clinicopathological properties. Third, single-sample prediction allowed for de novo identification of KEAP1/NRF2-active tumors within KEAP1/NRF2-wild-type samples. Our data demonstrate that KEAP1/NRF2-mutant lung cancer is a microenvironmentally distinct, biologically heterogeneous, and clinically underestimated disease. These new pathological and molecular insights may accelerate the development of efficacious therapeutic strategies against human malignancies featured by KEAP1-NRF2 pathway activation.     

Survival Outcomes and Treatment Patterns in Patients With NFE2L2 and/or KEAP1 Mutation-Positive Advanced Squamous Cell NSCLC Using a Real-World Clinico-Genomic Database

BackgroundNFE2L2 and/or KEAP1 mutations are associated with worse prognosis in all non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We determined real-world survival outcomes and treatment patterns among patients with advanced squamous cell NSCLC by NFE2L2 and KEAP1 mutation status.Patients and MethodsA retrospective study (January 2011-December 2018) was conducted using a de-identified US-based clinico-genomic database. Adult patients with advanced squamous cell NSCLC with ≥ 2 in-network visits and comprehensive genomic profiling during the study period were included. Outcomes included real-world progression free survival (rwPFS) by line of therapy and overall survival (OS). The real-world effectiveness of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 first-line therapy was also evaluated in patients with a NFE2L2 and/or KEAP1 mutation.ResultsOf 703 patients included (median age: 70.0 years), 31.6% had a NFE2L2 and/or KEAP1 mutation. The most common first- and second-line treatments regardless of mutation status were platinum-based chemotherapies and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. The most common third-line treatment was anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in patients with a NFE2L2 and/or KEAP1 mutation and single-agent chemotherapy in patients with wild-type disease. Patients with a NFE2L2 and/or KEAP1 mutation versus wild-type disease had significantly shorter rwPFS (4.54 vs. 6.25 months; P = .003) following first- but not second- or third-line therapy and shorter median OS (13.59 vs. 17.37 months; P  =  .4105). No survival differences were observed in patients with a NFE2L2 and/or KEAP1 mutation receiving first-line anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies versus other therapies.ConclusionsPatients with advanced squamous cell NSCLC with a NFE2L2 and/or KEAP1 mutation have poor real-world survival, highlighting the need for a genotype-directed therapeutic strategy in this population.     

p62 promotes bladder cancer cell growth by activating KEAP1/NRF2‐dependent antioxidative response

p62 is associated with 2 major cellular defense mechanisms against metabolic and oxidative stress, autophagy and the Kelch‐like ECH‐associated protein 1 (KEAP1)‐nuclear factor‐E2‐related factor 2 (NRF2) system. Recent studies indicate that the p62‐KEAP1‐NRF2 pathway promotes tumorigenesis and tumor growth mediated by NRF2‐dependent antioxidative response. However, whether p62 is involved in bladder cancer (BCa) development remains unknown. Here, we found that p62 is overexpressed in BCa tissue and several BCa cell lines. The knockdown of p62 inhibits BCa cell growth both in vitro and in vivo, with increased intracellular reactive oxygen species level. Mechanically, p62 activates NRF2 signaling by sequestrating KEAP1, which leads to the upregulation of antioxidant genes (Gclc, Gstm5, and Gpx2), thus protecting BCa cells from oxidative stress. Our findings indicate that p62 might be involved in the development of BCa and serve as a potential therapeutic target.     

基于Oncomine和GEPIA数据库分析NFE2L3基因在胃癌组织中的表达及其临床意义

目的:通过数据库挖掘分析NFE2L3基因在胃癌组织中的表达水平及其临床意义.方法:通过On-comine数据库和GEPIA网站分析NFE2L3基因在胃癌组织中的差异性表达及其与生存预后关系;胃癌与正常组织的表达采用t检验分析,采用单因素方差分析胃癌不同临床分期的表达差异,使用Pearson指数分析胃癌相关研究,使用Ka...     

Phase 1b Study of Sintilimab Plus Anlotinib as First-line Therapy in Patients With Advanced NSCLC

IntroductionAlthough the interaction between tumor immune microenvironment and angiogenesis has been well established, evidence supporting the chemo-free combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors in treatment-naive patients with advanced NSCLC is insufficient. This report provides the efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with anlotinib as first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC from a phase 1b trial (NCT03628521).MethodsEligible patients who were treatment-naive and had unresectable stage IIIB/C or IV NSCLC without EGFR/ALK/ROS1 mutations received sintilimab (200 mg, day 1) and anlotinib (12 mg, day 1–14) every 3 weeks till disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Baseline programmed death-ligand 1 expression and tumor mutation burden status was assessed in all patients. The primary end points were objective response rate and safety.ResultsA total of 22 patients received sintilimab and anlotinib. Median follow-up was 15.8 months (range: 8.3–19.3). Sixteen patients achieved confirmed partial response with an objective response rate of 72.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49.8%–89.3%) and disease control rate of 100% (95% CI: 84.6%–100%). Median progression-free survival was 15 months (95% CI: 8.3 m, not reached), and the 12-month progression-free survival rate was 71.4% (95% CI: 47.2%–86.0%). The incidence rate of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 54.5%, and grade 3 hypertension was predominant (two of 22, 9.1%). No grade 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed, and one case of grade 5 immune-related pneumonitis occurred.ConclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that assessed an anti–programmed cell death protein 1 antibody combined with a multitarget antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor in the frontline setting for patients with NSCLC. In view of its encouraging efficacy, durability, and safety profile, sintilimab plus anlotinib represents a novel chemotherapy-free regimen in this patient population.     

Randomized Phase 2 Study of Osimertinib Plus Bevacizumab Versus Osimertinib for Untreated Patients With Nonsquamous NSCLC Harboring EGFR Mutations: WJOG9717L Study

IntroductionTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab for previously untreated patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations.MethodsWe conducted a randomized, open-label, phase 2 study at 21 institutions in Japan. Previously untreated patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations received either osimertinib (80 mg, daily) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, every 3 wk) or osimertinib monotherapy, and were stratified according to sex, stage, and EGFR mutation status. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population, assessed by means of blinded, independent central radiologic review.ResultsBetween January 2018 and September 2018, a total of 122 patients were enrolled (osimertinib + bevacizumab arm, 61 patients; osimertinib monotherapy arm, 61 patients). At a median follow-up duration of 19.8 months, the median PFS was 22.1 months for osimertinib plus bevacizumab and 20.2 months for osimertinib monotherapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.862 (60% confidence interval: 0.700–1.060, 95% confidence interval: 0.531–1.397, one-sided stratified log-rank p = 0.213). Adverse events of grade 3 or worse were observed in 34 patients (56%) in the osimertinib plus bevacizumab arm and 29 (48%) in the osimertinib monotherapy arm. In addition, two (3%) and 11 patients (18%) experienced any grade pneumonitis, respectively, and grade 3 pneumonitis was observed in one patient (2%) in each arm.ConclusionsThis study failed to exhibit the efficacy of osimertinib plus bevacizumab for improving the PFS among patients with nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations as first-line treatment.     

Avelumab Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Platinum-Treated Advanced NSCLC: 2-Year Follow-Up From the JAVELIN Lung 200 Phase 3 Trial

IntroductionIn the JAVELIN Lung 200 trial, avelumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1] antibody) did not significantly prolong overall survival (OS) versus docetaxel in patients with platinum-treated PD-L1+ NSCLC. We report greater than 2-year follow-up data.MethodsPatients with stage IIIB or IV or recurrent NSCLC with disease progression after platinum-doublet chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or docetaxel 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks. The primary end point was OS in patients with PD-L1+ tumors (greater than or equal to 1% tumor cell expression; IHC 73-10 pharmDx assay).ResultsOf 792 patients, 529 had PD-L1+ tumors (264 versus 265 in the avelumab versus docetaxel arms, respectively). As of March 4, 2019, median duration of follow-up for OS in the PD-L1+ population was 35.4 months in the avelumab arm and 34.7 months in the docetaxel arm; study treatment was ongoing in 25 (9.5%) versus 0 patients, respectively. In the PD-L1+ population, 2-year OS rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) with avelumab versus docetaxel were 29.9% (24.5%–35.5%) versus 20.5% (15.6%–25.8%); in greater than or equal to 50% PD-L1+ subgroups, 2-year OS rates were 36.4% (29.1%–43.7%) versus 17.7% (11.8%–24.7%) and in the greater than or equal to 80% subgroup were 40.2% (31.3%–49.0%) versus 20.3% (12.9%–28.8%), respectively. Median duration of response (investigator assessed) was 19.1 months (95% CI: 10.8–34.8) versus 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.1–8.3). Safety profiles for both arms were consistent with the primary analysis.ConclusionsAlthough the JAVELIN Lung 200 primary analysis (reported previously) revealed that avelumab did not significantly prolong OS versus docetaxel in patients with platinum-treated PD-L1+ NSCLC, posthoc analyses at 2 years of follow-up revealed that 2-year OS rates were doubled with avelumab in subgroups with higher PD-L1 expression (greater than or equal to 50% and greater than or equal to 80%).     

Differential Immune-Related Microenvironment Determines Programmed Cell Death Protein-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Blockade Efficacy in Patients With Advanced NSCLC

IntroductionProgrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is not a completely reliable predictive marker of the efficacy of anti–programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Immune-related tumor microenvironment (TME) is classified into four different types based on the tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) status and PD-L1 expression.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced NSCLC treated with anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy between 2015 and 2019. We investigated the association between the efficacy of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, the types of TME based on PD-L1 (clone: 22C3) expression, the density of CD8-positive TILs assessed by immunohistochemistry, and mutational profiles by next-generation sequencing.ResultsOverall, 228 patients were included in the analysis. The patients were classified into the following four groups: type I: PD-L1_High (tumor proportion score ≥ 50%)/TIL_High (≥85/mm²; n = 73); type II: PD-L1_Low (tumor proportion score < 50%)/TIL_Low (<85/mm²; n = 70); type III: PD-L1_High/TIL_Low (n = 37); and type IV: PD-L1_Low/TIL_High (n = 48). The objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy clearly differed according to the different TME types (ORR and PFS; type I: 64%, 14.5 mo; type II: 12%, 2.1 mo; type III: 24%, 3.6 mo; type IV; 41%, 10.8 mo). In patients with PD-L1_High tumors, type I tumors had significantly better ORR and PFS than type III tumors (ORR: p < 0.001 and PFS: p < 0.001). The presence of TP53 and KRAS mutation was related to the density of CD8-positive TILs and PD-L1 expression, respectively.ConclusionsDifferential types of TME, including PD-L1 expression and TIL status, could accurately predict the efficacy of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.     

Gefitinib With Concurrent Thoracic Radiotherapy in Unresectable Locally Advanced NSCLC With EGFR Mutation; West Japan Oncology Group 6911L

IntroductionAbout 10% of patients with locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC) harbor EGFR mutation and recent reports suggested the declined benefit with an immune checkpoint inhibitor in this population. The attempt that introduces EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor into the treatment of LA-NSCLC with EGFR mutation has been warranted.MethodsChemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC with sensitive EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R point mutation) were enrolled. Patients were treated with gefitinib (250 mg/d for 2 y) plus concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (64 Gy/32 fractions). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years (trial identifier, UMIN000008366).ResultsBetween August 2012 and November 2017, a total of 28 patients were enrolled and 27 were eligible. The median age was 67 years (range: 45–74); never/current or former smoker in 15/12 patients, respectively; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1 in 19/8; EGFR exon 19 deletion/exon 21 L858R in 13/14; and c-stage IIIA/IIIB in 14/13. The PFS rate at 2 years by independent review was 29.6% (one-sided 95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.6%–). The overall response rate was 81.5% (95% CI: 63.3%–91.3%), median PFS was 18.6 months (95% CI: 12.0–24.5 mo), and median overall survival was 61.1 months (95% CI: 38.1 mo–not reached). Approximately half of the patients exhibited solitary brain metastasis as their first site of relapse. Adverse events greater than or equal to grade 3 were fatigue, skin reaction, and appetite loss (3.7% each).ConclusionsThis prospective study revealed the tolerability and the possible efficacy of gefitinib plus concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in patients with LA-NSCLC having EGFR mutation.     

ERCC1、XRCC1表达对晚期NSCLC患者化疗疗效与预后的影响

目的 探讨晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)组织中切除修复交叉互补基因1(ERCC1)、X射线交叉互补修复基因1(XRCC1)表达对患者化疗疗效与预后的影响.方法 选取给予铂类药物方案治疗的晚期NSCLC患者78例,采用免疫组化SP法检测NSCLC组织标本中ERCC1、XRCC1蛋白表达水平,比较不同ERCC1、XRCC1表达水平患者的临床疗效、疾病进展时间(TrP)以及中位生存时间(MST).结果 78例患者中,ERCC1阳性表达率为43.6％ (34/78),XRCC1阳性表达率为34.6％(27/78);根据ERCC1、XRCC1表现分为+/+组16例、+/-或-/+组29例、-/-组33例.+/+组、+/-或-/+组、-/-组临床疗效、TTP及MST依次上升,3组比较差异均具有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 晚期NSCLC组织中ERCC1、XRCC1表达是评估患者化疗疗效与预后的重要因素之一.     

Cemiplimab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Advanced NSCLC: 2-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 EMPOWER-Lung 3 Part 2 Trial

IntroductionEMPOWER-Lung 3 part 2 (NCT03409614), a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study, investigated cemiplimab (antiprogrammed cell death protein 1) plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC without EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 aberrations, with either squamous or nonsquamous histology, irrespective of programmed death-ligand 1 levels. At primary analysis, after 16.4 months of follow-up, cemiplimab plus chemotherapy improved median overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy alone (21.9 versus 13.0 mo, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53–0.93, p = 0.014). Here, we report protocol-specified final OS and 2-year follow-up results.MethodsPatients (N = 466) were randomized 2:1 to receive histology-specific platinum-doublet chemotherapy, with 350 mg cemiplimab (n = 312) or placebo (n = 154) every 3 weeks for up to 108 weeks. Primary end point was OS; secondary end points included progression-free survival and objective response rates.ResultsAfter 28.4 months of median follow-up, median OS was 21.1 months (95% CI: 15.9–23.5) for cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus 12.9 months (95% CI: 10.6–15.7) for chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51–0.82, p = 0.0003); median progression-free survival was 8.2 months (95% CI: 6.4–9.0) versus 5.5 months (95% CI: 4.3–6.2) (HR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.44–0.68, p < 0.0001), and objective response rates were 43.6% versus 22.1%, respectively. Safety was generally consistent with previously reported data. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or higher was 48.7% with cemiplimab plus chemotherapy and 32.7% with chemotherapy alone.ConclusionsAt protocol-specified final OS analysis with 28.4 months of follow-up, the EMPOWER-Lung 3 study continued to reveal benefit of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC, across programmed death-ligand 1 levels.