Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: In a previous study of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, the LV5FU2 regimen, comprising leucovorin (LV) plus bolus and infusional fluorouracil (5FU) every 2 weeks, was superior to the standard North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Mayo Clinic 5-day bolus 5FU/LV regimen. This phase III study investigated the effect of combining oxaliplatin with LV5FU2, with progression-free survival as the primary end point. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred twenty previously untreated patients with measurable disease were randomized to receive a 2-hour infusion of LV (200 mg/m(2)/d) followed by a 5FU bolus (400 mg/m(2)/d) and 22-hour infusion (600 mg/m(2)/d) for 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks, either alone or together with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 1. RESULTS: Patients allocated to oxaliplatin plus LV5FU2 had significantly longer progression-free survival (median, 9.0 v 6.2 months; P =.0003) and better response rate (50.7% v 22.3%; P =.0001) when compared with the control arm. The improvement in overall survival did not reach significance (median, 16.2 v 14.7 months; P =. 12). LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin gave higher frequencies of National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 neutropenia (41. 7% v 5.3% of patients), grade 3/4 diarrhea (11.9% v 5.3%), and grade 3 neurosensory toxicity (18.2% v 0%), but this did not result in impairment of quality of life (QoL). Survival without disease progression or deterioration in global health status was longer in patients allocated to oxaliplatin treatment (P =.004). CONCLUSION: The LV5FU2-oxaliplatin combination seems beneficial as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer, demonstrating a prolonged progression-free survival with acceptable tolerability and maintenance of QoL.     

Superiority of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil-leucovorin compared with either therapy alone in patients with progressive colorectal cancer after irinotecan and fluorouracil-leucovorin: interim results of a phase III trial.

PURPOSE: In North America, no effective therapy has been available for patients with progressive metastatic colorectal cancer after front-line treatment with irinotecan, bolus fluorouracil (FU), and leucovorin (IFL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed after IFL therapy were randomly assigned to bolus and infusional FU and leucovorin (LV5FU2), single-agent oxaliplatin, or the combination (FOLFOX4). This planned interim analysis evaluated objective response rate (RR), time to tumor progression (TTP), and alleviation of tumor-related symptoms (TRS) in an initial cohort of patients. RESULTS: Between November 2000 and September 2001, 463 patients from 120 sites in North America were randomly assigned to treatment. FOLFOX4 proved superior to LV5FU2 in all measures of clinical efficacy. Objective RRs determined by an independent radiology panel were 9.9% for FOLFOX4 versus 0% for LV5FU2 (Fisher's exact test, P <.0001). Median TTP was 4.6 months for FOLFOX4 versus 2.7 months for LV5FU2 (two-sided, stratified log-rank test, P <.0001). Relief of TRS occurred in 33% of patients treated with FOLFOX4 versus 12% of patients treated with LVFU2 (chi2 test, P <.001). Single-agent oxaliplatin was not superior to LV5FU2 in any measure of efficacy. Patients treated with FOLFOX4 experienced a higher incidence of clinically significant toxicities than patients treated with LV5FU2, but these toxicities were predictable and did not result in a higher rate of treatment discontinuation or 60-day mortality rate. CONCLUSION: For patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, second-line treatment with FOLFOX4 is superior to treatment with LVFU2 in terms of RR, TTP, and relief of TRS.     

Randomised Phase III study of biweekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5FU with folinic acid and oxaliplatin versus monthly plus 5-FU/folinic acid in first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: A phase III study was started to compare oxaliplatin/5FU/LV in the first-line with bolus FU/LV in metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 302 patients were randomised and received bolus 5-FU 425 mg/m(2) day 1-5, FA 20 mg/m(2) day 1-5, q 4 wk or oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), 2 h-infusion, FA 200 mg/m(2), 1-h infusion. 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2), 24-h infusion day 1, q 2 wk. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). RESULTS: The median follow-up is 31.8 months, 90.4% of the patients have died. Confirmed RR, progression free survival (PFS; months) and median overall survival (OS; months) in 5FU/LV versus 5FU/LV/oxaliplatin were respectively 18.5% versus (vs) 33.8% (P = 0.004), 5.6 vs 6.7 (P = 0.016) and 13.3 vs 13.8 (P = 0.619). In the 5FU/LV/oxaliplatin arm less grade (3/4) toxicity was measured for diarrhoea, stomatitis, an increase in idiosyncratic side effects and neurosensory events compared with 5FU/LV. The quality of life (QOL) was equal in both arms. Second line treatment was given in 62% of the patients, crossover of 5FU/LV to 5FU/LV/oxaliplatin occurred in 14%. CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin in the first-line resulted in an increased RR and PFS with less grade 3/4 mucositis/diarrhoea compared with 5FU/LV alone. Idiosyncratic side effects deserve attention with oxaliplatin. Despite a low treatment cross over rate, OS in both groups was comparable.     

Oxaliplatin with weekly bolus fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin as first-line therapy for patients with colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the activity of biweekly oxaliplatin, combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil (FU) and low-dose leucovorin (LV) chemotherapy (bFOL), as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer; no previous therapy for advanced disease (adjuvant therapy allowed if >6 months since completion); and performance status 0, 1, or 2 were eligible and were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 days 1 and 15 plus LV 20 mg/m2 over 10 to 20 minutes, followed by a 500 mg/m2 bolus dose of FU on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Patients underwent response evaluation by computed tomographic scan every 2 months. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were entered, and 41 patients were treated, including 20 men and 22 women, nine with previous adjuvant chemotherapy and four with radiation therapy. Three patients achieved complete response, and 23 patients achieved partial response, for a response rate of 63% (95% CI, 49% to 78%). Major toxicities included cumulative neuropathy grade 2 (24%) and grade 3 (12%; requiring discontinuation of oxaliplatin), diarrhea grade 3 to 4 (29%) and grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity (10%). Median time to progression was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval, 7.1 to 10.8 months) with median survival of 15.9 months (95% confidence interval, 11.4 to 19.7 months). CONCLUSION: The bFOL regimen seems to have activity comparable to be infusional programs of FU combined with oxaliplatin. Prospective trials are warranted to determine the relative merits of this schedule compared with the currently indicated schedules.     

Systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: current options, current evidence.

Combination chemotherapy regimens including irinotecan and oxaliplatin markedly improve response rate and prolong median survival over fluorouracil with leucovorin (FU/LV), and have supplanted FU/LV as the standard systemic approach for metastatic colorectal cancer. The recent availability of five active chemotherapeutic agents has doubled the median overall survival for metastatic colorectal cancer from 10 to 20 months, and though the optimal strategy for incorporation of all drugs is still unclear, current data support the use of chemotherapy doublets in first-line rather than sequential single-agent therapy. Multidrug regimens increase both response rate and the proportion of patients able to undergo potentially curative resection. In addition, as many as 20% to 30% of patients never receive second-line chemotherapy. When used as single agents, bolus and infusional FU/LV and capecitabine are similarly effective but have differing toxicity. Chemotherapy combinations that incorporate infusion of FU are less toxic and more effective than those using bolus FU dosing. Capecitabine is under study as an alternative dosing method for use in combination regimens; however, the optimal dose has not been defined and final safety and efficacy outcomes are being addressed in ongoing phase II and III investigations. Three combinations have shown excellent first-line efficacy in phase III trials--IFL with bevacizumab, FOLFOX, and FOLFIRI--but neither of these combinations is clearly superior. Sound clinical judgment must continue to guide treatment decisions while we await data regarding the optimal combination and sequence of fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and cetuximab.     

Hepatic arterial oxaliplatin infusion plus intravenous chemotherapy in colorectal cancer with inoperable hepatic metastases: a trial of the gastrointestinal group of the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer.

PURPOSE: Isolated hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer constitute a frequent and serious therapeutic problem that has led to the evaluation of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of different drugs. Oxaliplatin combined with fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin is effective in the treatment of colorectal cancer. In this context, a phase II study was conducted to evaluate concomitant administration of oxaliplatin by HAI and intravenous (IV) FU plus leucovorin according to the LV5FU2 protocol (leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), FU 400 mg/m(2) IV bolus, FU 600 mg/m(2) 22-hour continuous infusion on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had metastatic colorectal cancer that was restricted to the liver and inoperable. The patients were not to have previously received oxaliplatin. After surgical insertion of a catheter in the hepatic artery, patients were treated with oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) HAI combined with FU + leucovorin IV according to the LV5FU2 protocol. Treatment was continued until disease progression or toxicity. Response was evaluated every 2 months. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included, and 26 patients were treated. Two hundred courses of therapy were administered, and the median number of courses received was eight courses (range, zero to 20 courses). The most frequent toxicity consisted of neutropenia. The main toxicity related to HAI was pain. The intent-to-treat objective response rate was 64% (95% CI, 44% to 81%; 18 of 28 patients). With a median follow-up of 23 months, the median overall and disease-free survival times were 27 and 27 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of oxaliplatin HAI and FU + leucovorin according to the LV5FU2 protocol is feasible and effective in patients presenting with isolated hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer.     

XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin): active first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Capecitabine has demonstrated high efficacy as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Oxaliplatin shows synergy with fluorouracil (FU), with little toxicity overlap. The XELOX regimen (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin), established in a previous dose-finding study, should improve on infused oxaliplatin with FU and leucovorin (FOLFOX) regimens. The present studies further characterize efficacy and safety of the XELOX regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The antitumor activity of XELOX was investigated in a colon cancer xenograft model. Patients with MCRC received first-line XELOX in 3-week treatment cycles: intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) (day 1) followed by oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily (day 1, evening, to day 15, morning). RESULTS: A preclinical study confirmed that capecitabine has supra-additive activity with oxaliplatin. In the clinical study, 53 of 96 patients (55%) achieved an objective response, and 30 (31%) experienced disease stabilization for >/= 3 months following treatment. After 24 months' minimum follow-up, median time to disease progression (TTP) and median overall survival were 7.7 and 19.5 months, respectively. XELOX safety was predictable and similar to the FOLFOX4 regimen, except that myelosuppression was uncommon with XELOX (grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, 7%). Most adverse events were mild to moderate, the most common being acute sensory neuropathy (85%). Sixty-day, all-cause mortality was 2%. CONCLUSION: XELOX is a highly effective first-line treatment for MCRC. Response rates, TTP, and overall survival are similar to those observed with FU/leucovorin/oxaliplatin combinations. XELOX provides a more convenient regimen, likely to be preferred by both patients and healthcare providers. Capecitabine has the potential to replace FU/LV in combination with oxaliplatin for MCRC.     

FOLFOX in patients aged between 76 and 80 years with metastatic colorectal cancer: an exploratory cohort of the OPTIMOX1 study

BACKGROUND: Patients older than 75 years of age are usually excluded from metastatic colorectal cancer randomized studies. The OPTIMOX1 study evaluated FOLFOX7, a simplified (s) leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) regimen (sLV5FU2) with high-dose oxaliplatin, in a new oxaliplatin stop-and-go strategy. An exploratory cohort of patients aged 76 to 80 years was included in the study. METHODS: In all, 620 previously untreated patients were randomized between FOLFOX4 until progression (arm A), or FOLFOX7 for 6 cycles, maintenance without oxaliplatin for 12 cycles, and reintroduction of FOLFOX7 (arm B). RESULTS: A total of 37 patients aged 76 to 80 years were included, 20 in arm A and 17 in arm B. The overall response rate (ORR) was 59.4%, comparable to younger patients (59%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.0 months and median overall survival (OS) was 20.7 months. These results did not differ from that in younger patients < or =75 years in the OPTIMOX1 study with PFS 9.0 months (P = .63) and OS 20.2 months (P = .57). They experienced slightly more grade 3 of 4 toxicity than younger patients: 65% versus 48% (P = .06), mainly with more neutropenia (41% vs 24%, P = .03) and neurotoxicity (22% vs 11%, P = .06). Tolerability, however, was manageable and no toxic death occurred in this elderly population. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of FOLFOX-based treatment was maintained in patients >75 years with both FOLFOX regimens. The oxaliplatin stop-and-go management strategy performed well in this population.     

奥沙利铂为主方案治疗进展期结直肠癌的临床观察

目的：观察含奥沙利铂联合方案治疗进展期结直肠癌的临床疗效及毒副反应.方法：经病理检查确诊的36例进展期结直肠癌患者分为A、B两组,分别予FOLFOX4（奥沙利铂、氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙）方案及XELOX（奥沙利铂和卡培他滨）方案化疗,按WHO标准评价客观疗效和毒副反应.结果：入组36例均可评价疗效.A组24例,无CR者,PR9例,近期客观有效率37.5%,中位疾病进展时间（TTP）为7.0个月;B组12例,CR1例,PR4例,近期客观有效率41.7%,中位TTP为7.1个月,两组近期有效率无统计学差异.结论：与标准的FOLFOX4方案比较,XELOX方案治疗进展期结直肠癌疗效确切,毒副反应轻,尤其对于一般情况欠佳的患者耐受性好.     

草酸铂联合氟尿嘧啶、甲酰四氢叶酸治疗晚期大肠癌临床疗效观察

目的观察应用草酸铂联合氟尿嘧啶、甲酰四氢叶酸治疗晚期大肠癌的客观疗效及不良反应。方法草酸铂联合甲酰四氢叶酸和氟尿嘧啶持续静脉滴注46小时治疗晚期大肠癌48例(L-OHP130mg/m2静注2小时,d1,CF400mg/m2静脉输注2小时,d2,再接5-FU3.0g/m2用输液泵连续静注46小时,以上治疗方案每2周重复一次,化疗第5~11天均给予升白支持),所有病人均接受3个周期以上化疗。结果PR 23例,SD 18例,PD 7例,总有效率47.9%,中位疾病无进展期6.6个月,中位生存期10.5个月,1年生存率36.8%。主要不良反应有恶心、呕吐、黏膜炎、外周神经炎等。毒性反应多为Ⅰ~Ⅱ度,病人耐受良好。结论应用草酸铂联合氟尿嘧啶、甲酰四氢叶酸治疗晚期大肠癌疗效确切,不良反应轻微,值得临床推广使用。     

Antitumour activity of three second-line treatment combinations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after optimal 5-FU regimen failure: a randomised, multicentre phase II study.

BACKGROUND: We have investigated the efficacy, safety and quality of life profiles of three therapeutic combinations [irinotecan + leucovorin (LV)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin + LV/5-FU and irinotecan +oxaliplatin] in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of a 5-FU-based regimen, or whose disease had progressed within 6 months of the end of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and one patients were randomised to receive either: (i) irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by an LV 200 mg/m(2) infusion, before a 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus followed by a 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) infusion (LV5FU2 regimen), on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; (ii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by the LV5FU2 regimen on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; or (iii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) followed by irinotecan 200 mg/m(2), both on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat ORRs were 11.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-26.7), 21.2% (95% CI 9.0-38.9) and 15.2% (95% CI 5.1-31.9), respectively, in the three arms. Tumour growth control was >or=60% for all three combinations and overall survivals were 12.2 months (95% CI 9.2-16.0), 11.5 months (95% CI 9.0-14.1) and 11.0 months (95% CI 8.1-12.2), respectively. All patients were evaluable for safety. Main grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (33 to 39% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, second-line treatment with irinotecan/LV5FU2, oxaliplatin/LV5FU2 or irinotecan/oxaliplatin, provides good tumour growth control and survival coupled with an acceptable safety profile.     

Mortality associated with daily bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin administered in combination with either irinotecan or oxaliplatin: results from Intergroup Trial N9741

BACKGROUND: Intergroup Trial N9741 evaluated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) administered in conjunction with either irinotecan or oxaliplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The current report describes two treatment arms that were withdrawn from the protocol due to unexpected treatment-related toxicities and a high mortality rate. The complications observed in these arms highlight the importance of aggressive and immediate supportive care in the management of digestive toxicity. METHODS: In Trial N9741, patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following six regimens: 1) irinotecan plus bolus 5-FU/LV (Arm A); 2) sequential irinotecan plus bolus 5-FU/LV (Arm B); 3) bolus 5-FU/LV only (Mayo Clinic regimen; Arm D); 4) oxaliplatin plus bolus 5-FU/LV (Arm E); 5) oxaliplatin plus infusional 5-FU/LV (Arm F); or 6) oxaliplatin plus irinotecan (Arm G). In the current study, the authors investigated treatment-related toxicity in patients who received either of the two combination regimens containing daily bolus 5-FU (i.e., patients in Arm B or Arm E). RESULTS: Sixty-one and 47 patients were enrolled in Arm B and Arm E, respectively. Diarrhea and neutropenia were the most common toxicities in both groups. Five patients in Arm B (8.2%) and 4 patients in Arm E (8.5%) died within 60 days of study entry. All fatal toxicities occurred within 15 days of treatment administration, and all deaths were associated with the simultaneous occurrence of multiple symptoms, which were dominated by Grade > or = 3 diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Combination regimens containing daily bolus 5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin or irinotecan can be associated with severe gastrointestinal toxicity and high mortality rates. Therefore, the authors recommend the use of more tolerable infusional 5-FU-based regimens in the treatment of metastatic CRC.     

Phase I trial of oxaliplatin plus S-1 chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Advanced colorectal cancer can be effectively treated with S-1, as well as with a combination of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and leucovorin (LV). However, S-1 together with oxaliplatin may provide a more convenient alternative to 5FU/LV. To evaluate the performance of S-1 combined with oxaliplatin for patients with colorectal cancer, we conducted a Phase I clinical trial in an outpatient setting. We administered S-1 to 15 patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma for two weeks followed by one week of rest. Oxaliplatin was also administered on day 1 of the S-1 cycle. The dose of oxaliplatin was increased from 40 to 85 mg/m(2) to define the maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose in preparation for a Phase II trial. We administered 102 courses of treatment to 15 patients. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia developed in only 1 patient at a dose of 85 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin plus oral S-1. No other grade 3-4 toxicities developed. No dose-limiting toxicity developed at level 4 of our regimen (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2)), and the recommended dose for a Phase II trial was 85 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin in an outpatient setting.     

Randomized multicenter phase II trial of bolus plus infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin compared with fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin as third-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The addition of oxaliplatin to fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) improves the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This multicenter study evaluated FU/LV with or without oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic CRC after disease progression on sequential fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fourteen patients were randomly assigned to receive LV 200 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) and FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus, followed by FU 600 mg/m2 IV over 22 hours on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks (LV5FU2); or LV and FU as described, plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours on day 1 of the schedule (FOLFOX4). The primary end point was overall response. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in the two treatment arms. Objective response (complete + partial) rates for LV5FU2 versus FOLFOX4 were 2% v 13% (P = .0027), respectively. Median time to disease progression was 2.4 v 4.8 months (P < .0001), and median survival was 11.4 v 9.9 months (P = .20) for LV5FU2 and FOLFOX4, respectively. Among the 72 patients who crossed over from LV5FU2 to FOLFOX4, 6% responded. Symptomatic improvement was significantly better for patients in the FOLFOX4 arm (32% v 18% for LV5FU2, P = .05). Grade 3/4 toxicities for LV5FU2 and FOLFOX4 were neutropenia (13% and 42%, respectively), diarrhea (6% and 16%, respectively), and overall neuropathy (0% and 6%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with metastatic CRC, the FOLFOX4 regimen was superior to LV5FU2 with a higher response rate and time to disease progression. FOLFOX4 is an effective regimen even after disease progression on two previous chemotherapy regimens with fluoropyrimidines and irinotecan.     

A four-arm, randomized, multicenter phase II trial of oxaliplatin combined with varying schedules of 5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy in previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), with or without leucovorin (LV), is effective and well tolerated for first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). However, there is no consensus as to which oxaliplatin/5-FU-containing regimen is superior in the first-line setting. This randomized, multicenter phase II trial was designed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of 4 different oxaliplatin/5-FU regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated metastatic CRC (mCRC; n = 129) were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment regimens: (1) continuous 5-FU infusion plus oxaliplatin (n = 23); (2) weekly 5-FU bolus with LV plus oxaliplatin (n = 40); (3) oxaliplatin with 2-day infusion 5-FU/LV (FOLFOX4, n = 41); and (4) chronomodulated 5-FU plus oxaliplatin (n = 25). RESULTS: Overall response rates, after expert assessment, ranged from 24% to 34%, and median progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 6 months to 8 months. Although no significant differences in efficacy were detected in pairwise comparisons of the 4 different regimens, patients randomized to FOLFOX4 had the highest response rate and longest PFS. The FOLFOX4 regimen was also associated with the lowest incidence of severe (grade 3/4) toxicity, with the exception of cumulative peripheral neurotoxicity. CONCLUSION: This randomized phase II trial provides evidence that oxaliplatin/5-FU regimens are effective and well tolerated for first-line therapy of previously untreated mCRC. The FOLFOX regimens are now an established standard for CRC.     

A meta-analysis of chemotherapy regimen Fluorouracil/Leucovorin/Oxaliplatin Compared with Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in treating advanced colorectal cancer

BackgroundWe performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Fluorouracil (FU)/Leucovorin (LV)/Oxaliplatin compared to FU/LV in treating advanced colorectal cancer.MethodsTwo independent researchers identified and extracted all relevant literature using MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library Database. The regimens included arm A (FU/LV) and arm B (FU/LV/Oxaliplatin) with no other chemotherapy agent.ResultsFive randomized controlled trials (RCTs) fulfilled the requirements. All RCTs showed superiority of FU/LV/Oxaliplatin to FU/LV when measuring RR (response rate) and PFS (progression-free survival); no significant improvement in OS (overall survival) was observed. This meta-analysis shows a better RR for the FU/LV/Oxaliplatin group (OR 4.02, 95% CI 2.37–6.82, p < 0.00001). The incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, vomiting, neurological toxicity, toxicity-related dose modification and discontinuation was higher in the FU/LV/Oxaliplatin group, while the incidence of anemia, nausea and diarrhea was not different.ConclusionFU/LV/Oxaliplatin offers better efficacy (RR and PFS) than FU/LV in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. The incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities, i.e. neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, vomiting, neurological toxicity, is significantly higher in the FU/LV/Oxaliplatin than in the FU/LV group but these are manageable or reversible.     

奥沙利铂联合氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙治疗晚期大肠癌

目的：研究奥沙利铂、氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙联合治疗晚期大肠癌的疗效和毒性反应，并将该方案和氟尿嘧啶与亚叶酸钙联合治疗方案相比较。方法：经病理确诊的晚期大肠癌83例分为以下两组：治疗组行奥沙利铂(oxalipatin)130mg／m^2静脉滴注，第1天给药：氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)425mg／m^2静脉滴注，第1-5天给药；亚叶酸钙(CF)100mg／m^2静脉滴注，第1～5天给药；每3周重复。对照组行氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)42h5mg／m^2静脉滴注,第1～5天给药；亚叶酸钙(CF)100mg／m^2。静脉滴注，第1-5天给药；每3周重复。每例患者至少完成两个周期。结果：治疗组有效率为46．5％，常见的毒性反应为神经毒性；对照组有效率为17．5％，与治疗组差别有统计学意义，未见神经毒性，其他毒性与治疗组无统计学差异。结论：奥沙利铂联合氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙治疗晚期大肠癌,患者对其耐受良好，毒副反应较轻，疗效高于氟尿嘧啶加亚叶酸钙方案。     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of two different schedules of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the toxicities and clinical activity of two irinotecan (CPT-11), fluorouracil (FU), leucovorin (LV), and oxaliplatin schedules in patients with advanced solid tumors. Additionally, we investigated the effect of CPT-11 on oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients (cohort 1) received intravenous CPT-11 (infusion) and FU/LV (bolus) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 and oxaliplatin (infusion) on days 1 and 15 every 6 weeks for a total 37 courses (median, three courses) at three dose levels. Twenty-two cohort 2 patients received intravenous CPT-11/oxaliplatin (infusion, day 1) and FU/LV (90-minute bolus infusion, days 2 to 5) every 3 weeks for a total of 122 courses (median, four courses) at three dose levels. Pharmacokinetic and neurotoxicity assessments were performed at the cohort 2 MTD. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) seen in both cohorts at the starting dose required dose de-escalation. Cohort 1 DLT included diarrhea and neutropenia. In cohort 2, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and paresthesias were DLTs. Antitumor activity was seen in both cohorts. In cohort 2, the total platinum area under the curve of patients increased 17% in cycle 2 (P =.048), but objective neurotoxicity was not seen. CONCLUSION: The toxicities resulting from the addition of oxaliplatin to CPT-11/FU/LV are significant but manageable. The MTDs for the weekly schedule are CPT-11 (75 mg/m2), oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2), FU (320 mg/m2), and LV (20 mg/m2); and, for the 3-weekly schedule, the MTDs are CPT-11 (175 mg/m2), oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2), FU (240 mg/m2), and LV (20 mg/m2). Second-cycle platinum accumulation raises the possibility for enhanced cumulative neurotoxicity with CPT-11/oxaliplatin combinations.     

High-dose irinotecan plus LV5FU2 or simplified LV5FU (HD-FOLFIRI) for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a new way to allow resection of liver metastases?

The antitumor efficacy of irinotecan may be dose dependent. This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of high-dose (HD) irinotecan combined with LV5FU2 or simplified LV5FU (LV5FUs) in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients with unresectable and measurable metastatic colorectal cancer, not pretreated for metastatic disease, were given irinotecan 260 mg/m(2) combined with LV5FU2 in the first 25 patients, then with LV5FUs (HD-FOLFIRI) in 35 patients. G-CSF was given in case of febrile neutropenia, grade 4 neutropenia >7 days or neutropenia grade >1 at day 15. Results: The response rate was 57% (95% confidence interval 43-69%). Second surgery with curative intent was performed in 28% of patients, leading to 20% radiological complete response. Median response duration, time to progression and overall survival were 11, 9 and 22 months, respectively. The median dose intensity of irinotecan was 117 mg/m(2)/week. G-CSF was given to 45% of patients over 33% of cycles. Usual toxicity of irinotecan and 5-FU were observed without major increased frequency, except hematological toxicity. Tolerance was similar with LV5FU2 and LV5FUs, though more asymptomatic grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed with LV5FU2. Conclusion: HD-irinotecan plus LV5FU2 or HD-FOLFIRI is feasible and achieved a high response rate and postsurgery complete response rate.     

FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study.

PURPOSE: In metastatic colorectal cancer, phase III studies have demonstrated the superiority of fluorouracil (FU) with leucovorin (LV) in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin over FU + LV alone. This phase III study investigated two sequences: folinic acid, FU, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) followed by folinic acid, FU, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX6; arm A), and FOLFOX6 followed by FOLFIRI (arm B). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with assessable disease were randomly assigned to receive a 2-hour infusion of l-LV 200 mg/m(2) or dl-LV 400 mg/m(2) followed by a FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) and 46-hour infusion 2,400 to 3,000 mg/m(2) every 46 hours every 2 weeks, either with irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) or with oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 1. At progression, irinotecan was replaced by oxaliplatin (arm A), or oxaliplatin by irinotecan (arm B). RESULT: Median survival was 21.5 months in 109 patients allocated to FOLFIRI then FOLFOX6 versus 20.6 months in 111 patients allocated to FOLFOX6 then FOLFIRI (P =.99). Median second progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.2 months in arm A versus 10.9 in arm B (P =.64). In first-line therapy, FOLFIRI achieved 56% response rate (RR) and 8.5 months median PFS, versus FOLFOX6 which achieved 54% RR and 8.0 months median PFS (P =.26). Second-line FOLFIRI achieved 4% RR and 2.5 months median PFS, versus FOLFOX6 which achieved 15% RR and 4.2 months PFS. In first-line therapy, National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3/4 mucositis, nausea/vomiting, and grade 2 alopecia were more frequent with FOLFIRI, and grade 3/4 neutropenia and neurosensory toxicity were more frequent with FOLFOX6. CONCLUSION: Both sequences achieved a prolonged survival and similar efficacy. The toxicity profiles were different.