Lateral approach to the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa: a comparison between 1.5% mepivacaine and 0.75% ropivacaine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ropivacaine and mepivacaine are commonly used local anesthetics for peripheral nerve blockade. The purpose of the present study was to compare onset time, quality of anesthesia, and duration of analgesia with ropivacaine 0.75% and mepivacaine 1.5% for lateral popliteal nerve block. METHODS: Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II patients scheduled for foot and ankle surgery with calf tourniquet under lateral popliteal sciatic nerve block were randomly assigned to receive 30 mL of either ropivacaine 0.75% or mepivacaine 1.5%. Time required for onset of sensory and motor block, resolution of motor blockade, onset of postsurgical pain, and time of first analgesic medication were recorded. RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar with regard to demographic variables and duration of surgery. Onset of sensory and motor block was significantly shorter in the mepivacaine group (9.9 +/- 3.3 min and 14.7 +/- 3.6 min, respectively) than in the ropivacaine group (18.1 +/- 6.1 min and 23.6 +/- 5.5 min, respectively) (P < 0.001). Resolution of motor block occurred later in the ropivacaine group than in the mepivacaine group (P < 0.001), and duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly longer in the ropivacaine group (19 +/- 3.4 h) compared with the mepivacaine group (5.9 +/- 1.1 h) (P < 0.001). Analgesic requirements were higher in mepivacaine group than in the ropivacaine group (P < 0.001). There were 2 failed blocks, one in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Both ropivacaine and mepivacaine provided effective sciatic nerve blockade. Mepivacaine 1.5% displayed a significantly shorter onset time than ropivacaine 0.75%. Postoperatively, ropivacaine 0.75% resulted in longer-lasting analgesia and less need for oral pain medication.     

Pulmonary function changes after interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia with 0.5% and 0.75% ropivacaine: a double-blinded comparison with 2% mepivacaine

The purpose of this investigation was to compare, in a prospective, double-blinded fashion, 0.5% and 0.75% ropivacaine with 2% mepivacaine to determine their effects on respiratory function during interscalene brachial plexus (IBP) anesthesia. With ethical committee approval and written, informed consent, 30 healthy patients presenting for elective shoulder capsuloplastic or acromioplastic procedures were randomized to receive IBP anesthesia by 20 mL of either 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 10), 0.75% ropivacaine (n = 10), or 2% mepivacaine (n = 10). Block onset time, pulmonary function variables, ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic motion (ultrasonographic evaluation), and first requirement of postoperative analgesic were evaluated. Surgical anesthesia (loss of pinprick sensation from C4 to C7 and motor block of the shoulder joint) was achieved later with 0.5% ropivacaine than with either 0.75% ropivacaine or 2% mepivacaine (P < 0.05), whereas the first pain medication was requested later with both ropivacaine concentrations than with mepivacaine (P < 0.0005). No differences in quality of the block or patient acceptance were observed in the three groups. All 30 patients had ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic paresis and large mean decreases in forced vital capacity (ropivacaine 0.5%: 40% +/- 17%, ropivacaine 0.75%: 41% +/- 22%, mepivacaine 2%: 39% +/- 21%) and forced expiratory volume at 1 s (ropivacaine 0.5%: 30% +/- 19%, ropivacaine 0.75%: 38% +/- 26%, mepivacaine 2%: 40% +/- 10%). We conclude that, when performing IBP anesthesia, 0.5% ropivacaine does not decrease the incidence of ipsilateral paresis of the hemidiaphragm compared with 0.75% ropivacaine and 2% mepivacaine. IMPLICATIONS: During the first 30 min after placing interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia, 0.5% ropivacaine does not provide clinically relevant advantages in terms of pulmonary function changes compared with either 0.75% ropivacaine or 2% mepivacaine. However, 0.75% ropivacaine allows a short onset, similar to that of mepivacaine, with long postoperative analgesia.     

Ropivacaine or 2% mepivacaine for lower limb peripheral nerve blocks. Study Group on Orthopedic Anesthesia of the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, and Intensive Care

BACKGROUND: Intra- and postoperative clinical properties of sciatic-femoral nerve block performed with either ropivacaine at different concentrations or mepivacaine have been evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, blinded study. METHODS: Adult patients scheduled for foot and ankle surgery were randomized to receive combined sciatic-femoral nerve block with 225 mg of either 0.5% (n = 83), 0.75% (n = 87), or 1% (n = 86) ropivacaine, or with 500 mg of 2% mepivacaine (n = 84). A thigh tourniquet was used in all patients. Onset time, adequacy of surgical anesthesia, time to offset of nerve block, and time until first postoperative requirement for pain medication were evaluated by a blinded observer. RESULTS: The adequacy of nerve block was similar in the four treatment groups (the ratios between adequate:inadequate: failed blocks were 74:9:0 with 0.5% ropivacaine, 74:13:0 with 0.75% ropivacaine, 78:8:0 with 1% ropivacaine, and 72:12:0 with 2% mepivacaine). The onset of the block was slower with 0.5% ropivacaine than with other anesthetic solutions (P < 0.001). Regardless of the concentration, ropivacaine produced a longer motor blockade (10.5+/-3.8 h, 10.3+/-4.3 h, and 10.2+/-5.1 h with 0.5%, 0.75%, and 1% ropivacaine, respectively) than with mepivacaine (4.3+/-2.6 h; P < 0.001). The duration of postoperative analgesia was shorter after mepivacaine (5.1+/-2.7 h) than after ropivacaine (12.2+/-4.1 h, 14.3+/-5 h, and 14.5+/-3.4 h, with 0.5%, 0.75%, or 1% ropivacaine, respectively; P < 0.001). Pain relief after 0.5% ropivacaine was 14% shorter than 0.75% or 1% ropivacaine (P < 0.05). During the first 24 h after surgery, 30-37% of patients receiving ropivacaine required no analgesics compared with 10% of those receiving mepivacaine (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that 0.75% ropivacaine is the most suitable choice of local anesthetic for combined sciatic-femoral nerve block, providing an onset similar to mepivacaine and prolonged postoperative analgesia.     

Interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia with 0.5%, 0.75% or 1% ropivacaine: a double-blind comparison with 2% mepivacaine

We have compared interscalene brachial plexus block performed with ropivacaine or mepivacaine in 60 healthy patients undergoing elective shoulder surgery. Patients were allocated randomly to receive interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia with 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 15), 0.75% ropivacaine (n = 15), 1% ropivacaine (n = 15) or 2% mepivacaine (n = 15). Readiness for surgery (loss of pinprick sensation from C4 to C7 and inability to elevate the limb from the bed) was achieved sooner with 1% ropivacaine (mean 10 (SD 5) min) than with 0.5% ropivacaine (22 (7) min) (P < 0.001) or 2% mepivacaine (18 (9) min) (P < 0.02). Postoperative analgesia was similar with the three ropivacaine concentrations (11.5 (5) h, 10.7 (2) h and 10 (2.4) h with 0.5%, 0.75% and 1% concentrations, respectively) and nearly two-fold longer compared with 2% mepivacaine (5.1 (2.7) h) (P < 0.001).      

Ropivacaine or 2% Mepivacaine for Lower Limb Peripheral Nerve Blocks

Background: Intra- and postoperative clinical properties of sciatic-femoral nerve block performed with either ropivacaine at different concentrations or mepivacaine have been evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, blinded study.

Methods: Adult patients scheduled for foot and ankle surgery were randomized to receive combined sciatic-femoral nerve block with 225 mg of either 0.5% (n = 83), 0.75% (n = 87), or 1% (n = 86) ropivacaine, or with 500 mg of 2% mepivacaine (n = 84). A thigh tourniquet was used in all patients. Onset time, adequacy of surgical anesthesia, time to offset of nerve block, and time until first postoperative requirement for pain medication were evaluated by a blinded observer.

Results: The adequacy of nerve block was similar in the four treatment groups (the ratios between adequate:inadequate: failed blocks were 74:9:0 with 0.5% ropivacaine, 74:13:0 with 0.75% ropivacaine, 78:8:0 with 1% ropivacaine, and 72:12:0 with 2% mepivacaine). The onset of the block was slower with 0.5% ropivacaine than with other anesthetic solutions (P < 0.001). Regardless of the concentration, ropivacaine produced a longer motor blockade (10.5 +/- 3.8 h, 10.3 +/- 4.3 h, and 10.2 +/- 5.1 h with 0.5%, 0.75%, and 1% ropivacaine, respectively) than with mepivacaine (4.3 +/- 2.6 h; P < 0.001). The duration of postoperative analgesia was shorter after mepivacaine (5.1 +/- 2.7 h) than after ropivacaine (12.2 +/- 4.1 h, 14.3 +/- 5 h, and 14.5 +/- 3.4 h, with 0.5%, 0.75%, or 1% ropivacaine, respectively; P < 0.001). Pain relief after 0.5% ropivacaine was 14% shorter than 0.75% or 1% ropivacaine (P < 0.05). During the first 24 h after surgery, 30-37% of patients receiving ropivacaine required no analgesics compared with 10% of those receiving mepivacaine (P < 0.001).     

The bilateral superficial cervical plexus block with 0.75% ropivacaine administered before or after surgery does not prevent postoperative pain after total thyroidectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients undergoing thyroid surgery need postoperative pain management. Bilateral superficial cervical plexus block by administration of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200000 epinephrine at the end of surgery has been shown to improve postoperative analgesia. The objective of this study was to assess the analgesic efficacy in the first 36 postoperative hours after total thyroidectomy of bilateral superficial cervical plexus block with 0.75% ropivacaine administered before the incision or on completion of the surgical procedure. METHODS: We performed a prospective double-blinded, randomized controlled trial that compared 3 parallel groups: the CONT group did not receive any block, the PRE group received bilateral superficial cervical plexus block before surgery while under general anesthesia, and the POST group received bilateral superficial cervical plexus block after surgery while under general anesthesia. The study included 111 patients (37 in each group). Postoperative pain was assessed every 4 hours by use of a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale. All patients received paracetamol every 6 hours. Morphine was administered following a standardized protocol if the numeric rating scale was 4 or higher. The main outcome variables were the proportion of patients given morphine during the 36 hours period, pain intensity scores, and morphine consumption. RESULTS: No intergroup differences were observed in terms of percentage of patients who required morphine, morphine delivery, pain scores, and intraoperative opioid consumption. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral superficial cervical plexus block with 0.75% ropivacaine administered before or after surgery does not improve postoperative analgesia after total thyroidectomy.     

Peribulbar anesthesia with either 0.75% ropivacaine or a 2% lidocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine mixture for vitreoretinal surgery: a double-blinded study.

No study has evaluated the efficacy of ropivacaine in peribulbar block for ophthalmic surgery. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was to compare ropivacaine and a lidocaine-bupivacaine mixture in peribulbar anesthesia. Sixty ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for elective vitreoretinal surgery were randomized to receive a peribulbar block with 8 mL of either 0.75% ropivacaine (ropivacaine group, n = 30) or a 1:1 mixture of 2% plain lidocaine and 0.5% plain bupivacaine (lido-bupivacaine group, n = 30). Time required for onset of surgical anesthesia, quality of postoperative analgesia, incidence of side effects, and analgesic consumption were recorded. Surgical block was achieved after 8 +/- 5 min in the lido-bupivacaine group and after 10 +/- 5 min in the ropivacaine group (P = 0.23). A 3-mL supplemental injection 15 min after block placement was required in 6 patients in the lido-bupivacaine group (20%) and in 10 patients in the ropivacaine group (33%) due to inadequate motor block (P = 0.38). On Postoperative Day 1, 26 patients in the ropivacaine group (87%) reported no pain at the verbal rating score, compared with 18 patients in the lido-bupivacaine group (60%) (P = 0.005). We conclude that 0.75% ropivacaine may be a suitable choice when performing peribulbar anesthesia for vitreoretinal surgery. IMPLICATIONS: Quick onset of block with prolonged postoperative analgesia is an important goal in regional anesthesia for ophthalmic surgery. Evaluating clinical properties of 0.75% ropivacaine and a 1:1 mixture of 2% lidocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia, we demonstrated that ropivacaine has an onset similar to that of the lidocaine-bupivacaine mixture and provides a better quality of postoperative analgesia.     

A comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for cervical plexus block

We compared bupivacaine 0.5% and ropivacaine 0.75% for cervical plexus block (CB). Forty patients scheduled for carotid artery surgery were allocated randomly to undergo superficial and deep CB with 30 mL of one of the two anesthetic solutions. We evaluated the onset of anesthetic block; the requirement for supplementation during the surgery; the patients' satisfaction; postoperative pain on a visual analog scale at 1, 2, and 3 h; and the use of paracetamol as a rescue analgesic medication. Arterial blood was sampled immediately and 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after CB for measurements of bupivacaine or ropivacaine concentrations. Patients in both groups had equivalent onset of CB, local infiltration with lidocaine during surgery, and satisfaction scores. In the Bupivacaine group, visual analog scale scores were lower at 2 and 3 h, and the delay before paracetamol administration was prolonged. Observed peak concentrations were larger in the Ropivacaine group (4.25 [2.07-6.59 mg/L] vs 3.02 [0.98-5.82 mg/L]), but time to reach peak concentrations was comparable (5 [1-15 min] vs 5 [0-45 min] in the Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine groups, respectively). We conclude that ropivacaine has no advantage over bupivacaine for CB. IMPLICATIONS: Compared with bupivacaine (150 mg), a larger dose of ropivacaine (225 mg) produces comparable features of cervical plexus block but less postoperative analgesia and larger plasma concentrations. There is no reason to favor ropivacaine in such a case.     

Interscalene brachial plexus block with continuous intraarticular infusion of ropivacaine

Providing intraarticular analgesia with a continuous infusion of local anesthetic via a disposable infusion pump has gained popularity. Despite the prevalence of this technique, data comparing this method of analgesia to conventional regional anesthesia are not available. We present a prospective study that compared a single-dose interscalene block with a single-dose interscalene block plus continuous intraarticular infusion of local anesthetic. Forty patients scheduled for shoulder arthroscopy were entered in this prospective, double-blinded study. All patients received an interscalene brachial plexus block as their primary anesthetic. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: 1. interscalene block with 1.5% mepivacaine (40 mL) followed by a postoperative intraarticular infusion of 0.5% ropivacaine at 2 mL/h, or 2. interscalene block with 0.5% ropivacaine (40 mL) followed by a postoperative intraarticular infusion of 0.9% saline (placebo) at 2 mL/h. Postoperative infusions were maintained for 48 h. Visual analog scale pain scores and postoperative oxycodone consumption were measured for 48 h. Visual analog scale scores at rest and with ambulation in the Mepivacaine/Intraarticular Ropivacaine group were reduced when compared with the Ropivacaine/Saline group (rest: P = 0.003, ambulation: P = 0.006). Oxycodone consumption was also decreased (28 +/- 21 mg vs 44 +/- 28 mg, P = 0.046), respectively. We conclude that a brachial plexus block with 1.5% mepivacaine and a continuous intraarticular infusion of 0.5% ropivacaine at 2 mL/h provides improved analgesia for minor surgery at 24 and 48 h versus a single-injection interscalene block with 0.5% ropivacaine.     

Pre- and intraoperative epidural ropivacaine have no early preemptive analgesic effect in major gynecological tumour surgery

PURPOSE: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is an established technique for postoperative pain relief after major abdominal surgery. However it is still under discussion whether pre-incisional TEA can reduce postoperative pain perception or postoperative analgesic consumption. METHODS: The present prospective, randomized, double-blind study was performed to investigate the effects of intra- and postoperative TEA vs only postoperative TEA using ropivacaine 0.375% in 30 women scheduled for major abdominal tumour surgery. Prior to induction of general anesthesia patients received an epidural bolus of 10 mL saline in Group I (GI) and 10 mL ropivacaine 0.375% in Group II (GII) followed by an infusion of 6 mL x hr(-1) of the respective solution during surgery. Postoperatively all patients received an epidural infusion of 6 mL x hr(-1) ropivacaine 0.375% during 24 hr followed by patient controlled epidural analgesia for the next 72 hr. Operative data, dynamic pain scores, consumption of local anesthetics and standardized supplemental analgesics were analyzed. RESULTS: No difference was seen between groups with respect to the amount of required postoperative local anesthetics and supplemental analgesics, pain scores and side effects during the first 96 hr following surgery except a reduction of intraoperative sufentanil consumption (GI: 143.2 +/- 52.6 vs GII: 73.3 +/- 32.6 microg, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative TEA with ropivacaine 0.375% did not significantly reduce the amount of analgesics required after major abdominal gynecological tumour surgery.     

Sciatic nerve block with 0.5% levobupivacaine, 0.75% levobupivacaine or 0.75% ropivacaine: a double-blind, randomized comparison

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the onset time and duration of sciatic nerve block produced with 0.5% levobupivacaine, 0.75% levobupivacaine and 0.75% ropivacaine. METHODS: Forty-five healthy patients undergoing hallux valgus repair were randomly allocated to receive sciatic nerve block with levobupivacaine 0.5% (n=15), levobupivacaine 0.75% (n=15) or ropivacaine 0.75% 20 mL (n=15). A femoral nerve block was also performed with mepivacaine 2% 15 mL to cover pain related to the thigh tourniquet. A blinded observer recorded the onset time and duration of sciatic nerve block. RESULTS: The median (range) onset time was 5 (5-40) min with 0.75% levobupivacaine, 30 (5-60) min with 0.5% levobupivacaine and 20 (5-50) min with 0.75% ropivacaine (P = 0.02 and P = 0.12, respectively). Mean (25-75 percentiles) first request for pain medication occurred after 13 (11-14) h with 0.75% ropivacaine, 18 (15-19) h with 0.75% levobupivacaine and 16 (13-20) h with 0.5% levobupivacaine (P = 0.002 and P = 0.002, respectively). Rescue tramadol after surgery was required by three patients in the 0.75% levobupivacaine group, eight patients in the 0.5% levobupivacaine group and nine patients in the 0.75% ropivacaine group (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that 0.75% levobupivacaine provides a shorter onset time than 0.5% levobupivacaine and a longer duration of postoperative analgesia than both 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.75% ropivacaine with reduced need for rescue analgesia after surgery.     

Prilocaine or mepivacaine for combined sciatic-femoral nerve block in patients receiving elective knee arthroscopy

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the onset time of surgical block, recovery of motor function and duration of post-operative analgesia of combined sciatic-femoral nerve block performed with either mepivacaine or prilocaine. METHODS: With Ethical Committee approval and written informed consent, 30 ASA physical status I-II patients, undergoing elective arthroscopic knee surgery, received a combined sciatic-femoral nerve block with 30 ml of either 2% mepivacaine (n=15) or 1% prilocaine (n=15). An independent observer recorded the onset time of sensory and motor blocks, the need for intraoperative analgesia supplementation, recovery of motor function, and first request of post-operative pain medication. RESULTS: Onset time of nerve block required 15+/-5 min with prilocaine and 12+/-7 min with mepivacaine (p=0.33). No patient required general anesthesia to complete surgery; 3 patients receiving prilocaine (20%) and 2 patients receiving mepivacaine (13%) required 0.1 mg fentanyl intravenously to complete surgery (p=0.99). Recovery of motor function and first request of post-operative pain medication occurred after 238+/-36 min and 259+/-31 min with prilocaine, and 220+/-48 min and 248+/-47 min with mepivacaine (p=0.257 and p=0.43, respectively). Patient satisfaction was good in all studied patients. CONCLUSION: Prilocaine 1% provides adequate sensory and motor block for arthroscopic knee surgery, with a clinical profile similar to that produced by 2% mepivacaine, and may be a good option for surgical procedures of intermediate duration and not associated with severe postoperative pain.     

Interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia and analgesia for open shoulder surgery: a randomized,double-blinded comparison between levobupivacaine and ropivacaine

We compared the onset time and quality of interscalene brachial plexus block produced with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in 50 patients undergoing open shoulder surgery randomly allocated to receive 30 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 25) injected through a 20-gauge catheter placed into the interscalene sheath using a 18-gauge insulated and stimulating Tuohy introducer. The block was also prolonged after surgery using a patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with 0.125% levobupivacaine or 0.2% ropivacaine, respectively (basal infusion rate, 6 mL/h; bolus, 2 mL; lockout period, 15 min; maximum boluses per hour, three). Three patients (two with levobupivacaine [8%] and one with ropivacaine [4%]) failed to achieve surgical block within 45 min after the injection and were excluded. The onset time of surgical block was 20 min (10-40 min) with levobupivacaine and 20 min (5-45 min) with ropivacaine (P = 0.53). Rescue intraoperative analgesia (0.1 mg of fentanyl IV) was required in eight patients in each group (34%) (P = 0.99). Forty-two patients completed the 24-h postoperative infusion (22 with levobupivacaine and 20 with ropivacaine). Postoperative analgesia was similarly effective in both groups. Total consumption of local anesthetic infused during the first 24 h was 147 mL (144-196 mL) with levobupivacaine and 162 mL (144-248 mL) with ropivacaine (P = 0.019), with a ratio between boluses received and requested of 0.8 (0.4-1.0) and 0.7 (0.4-1.0), respectively (P = 0.004). The degree of motor block of the operated limb was deeper with levobupivacaine than ropivacaine when starting postoperative analgesia; however, no further differences in degree of motor function were observed between the two groups. We conclude that 30 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% induces an interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia of similar onset and intensity as the one produced by the same volume and concentration of ropivacaine. Postoperative interscalene analgesia with 0.125% levobupivacaine results in similar pain relief and recovery of motor function with less volume of local anesthetic than with 0.2% ropivacaine. IMPLICATIONS: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study demonstrates that 30 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine produces an interscalene brachial plexus block of similar onset and quality as the one produced by the same volume of 0.5% ropivacaine. When prolonging the block after surgery, 0.125% levobupivacaine provides adequate pain relief and recovery of motor function after open shoulder surgery, with less volume infused during the first 24 h after surgery than 0.2% ropivacaine.     

A comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 1% mepivacaine for sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare anesthetic efficacy and postoperative analgesia of 0.5% ropivacaine and 1% mepivacaine for sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa (popliteal block). METHODS: A prospective, double-blind study was carried out in 58 adult patients scheduled for outpatient foot or ankle surgery. They were randomized to receive popliteal block with 40 ml of either 0.5% ropivacaine (group R) or 1% mepivacaine (group M). An atraumatic, Teflon-coated needle connected to a neurostimulator was used to make a single puncture using a posterior approach. The times to onset of sensory and motor block, and the need for intraoperative sedation were recorded. Before discharge, patients were asked to document the time to first analgesic use, time to return of full sensation in the foot, and their evaluation of the technique. RESULTS: Onset time (mean+/-standard deviation, 95% confidence interval) of both sensory block (6.5+/-5.1 min, 4.47-8.49, in group R and 6.2+/-3.7 min, 4.83-7.69, in group M) and motor block (6.6+/-4.4 min, 4.81-8.23, in group R and 7.9+/-4.1 min, 6.29-9.53, in group M) was similar in both groups. Postoperative analgesia lasted longer in group R (15.2+/-5.1 h, 13.25-17.21) than in group M (5.7+/-1.8 h, 5.01-6.41; P<0.001). Duration of sensory block was longer in group R (20.7+/-6.2 h, 18.51-23.01) than in group M (6.5+/-1.7 h, 5.86-7.16; P<0.001). Acceptance of the anesthetic procedure was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: In this study we demonstrated that both 0.5% ropivacaine and 1% mepivacaine for popliteal block produced rapid, effective and safe anesthesia but postoperative analgesia was more long-lasting with ropivacaine.     

A comparison of superficial versus combined (superficial and deep) cervical plexus block for carotid endarterectomy: a prospective, randomized study

Carotid endarterectomy may be performed by using cervical plexus blockade with local anesthetic supplementation by the surgeon during surgery. Most practitioners use either a superficial cervical plexus block or a combined (superficial and deep) block, but it is unclear which offers the best operative conditions or greatest patient satisfaction. We compared the two techniques in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Forty patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy were randomized to receive either a superficial or a combined cervical plexus block. Bupivacaine 0.375% to a total dose of 1.4 mg/kg was used. The main outcome measure was the amount of supplemental lidocaine 1% used by the surgeon. Subsidiary outcome measures were postoperative pain score, sedative and analgesic requirements before and during surgery, and postoperative analgesic requirements. Median supplemental lidocaine requirements were 100 mg (range 30-180 mg) in the superficial block group and 115 mg (range 30-250 mg) in the combined block group. These differences were not statistically significant (Mann-Whitney U-test). There was no significant difference in the number of patients needing postoperative analgesia between the groups (11 of 20 in the deep block group versus 8 of 20 in the superficial block group) in the 24 h after surgery. The median time to first analgesia in the superficial block group was 150 min, more than in the combined block group (median time 45 min) but this difference, although large, was not statistically significant (Mann-Whitney U-test). We found no significant differences between the anesthetic techniques studied. All patients reported satisfaction with the techniques.     

超声引导下颈浅丛神经阻滞对颈椎前路减压融合术患者术后早期康复质量的影响

目的评价超声引导下颈浅丛神经阻滞对颈椎前路减压融合术患者术后早期康复质量的影响。方法择期行颈前路手术的颈椎病患者60例,男37例,女23例,年龄18~70岁,BMI 18.5~29.5 kg/m^2,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,采用随机数字表法分为两组:颈浅丛神经阻滞联合全麻组(S组)和全麻组(C组),每组30例。S组在全麻诱导前实施超声引导下右侧颈浅丛神经阻滞,注入0.375%罗哌卡因15 ml;C组不行神经阻滞。两组均静脉注射依托咪酯0.3 mg/kg、舒芬太尼0.4μg/kg、罗库溴铵0.6 mg/kg进行麻醉诱导,麻醉维持采用静-吸复合麻醉,术中维持BIS值40~60。分别于术前1 d、术后1 d采用QoR-40量表对患者进行评分。记录术中瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚用量、拔管时间、术后住院时间、术后补救镇痛情况,术后恶心呕吐、咽喉痛、吞咽困难、声音嘶哑等不良反应及神经阻滞相关并发症的发生情况。结果与C组比较,S组术后1 d的QoR-40总评分及身体舒适度、情绪状态、心理支持、疼痛评分明显提高(P<0.05),术中瑞芬太尼用量明显减少(P<0.05),术后补救镇痛率、术后恶心呕吐和吞咽困难发生率明显降低(P<0.05)。两组丙泊酚用量、拔管时间、术后住院时间、术后咽喉痛和声音嘶哑发生率差异无统计学意义。S组未出现神经阻滞相关并发症。结论超声引导下颈浅丛神经阻滞用于颈椎前路减压融合术,有利于提高患者早期康复质量。     

A double-blinded, randomized comparison of either 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block

To compare intraoperative and postoperative clinical properties of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block, 50 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing hallux valgus repair received a femoral nerve block with 15 mL of 2% mepivacaine. They were then randomly allocated in a double-blinded fashion to receive a sciatic nerve block with either 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 25). An independent blinded observer evaluated the onset time of surgical anesthesia as well as the quality of the surgical block and postoperative analgesia. The median (range) onset time of surgical block at the sciatic nerve distribution was 30 min (5-60 min) with levobupivacaine and 15 min (5-60 min) with ropivacaine (P = 0.63). Four patients (two patients in each group) received a supplementary ankle block by the surgeon just before the beginning of surgery. All four patients also received IV fentanyl supplementation, but in three of them, propofol infusion was required to complete surgery (two in the Levobupivacaine group [8%] and one in the Ropivacaine group [4%]; P = 0.99). In six patients of the Levobupivacaine group (24%) and five patients of the Ropivacaine group (20%), IV fentanyl supplementation was required to complete surgery (P = 0.99). No differences in the time to recovery of sensory and motor function were observed between the two groups, whereas median (range) duration of postoperative analgesia was 16 h (8-24 h) with levobupivacaine and 16 h (8-24 h) with ropivacaine (P = 0.83). We conclude that 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine provide comparable surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. IMPLICATIONS: No studies have compared the clinical properties of levobupivacaine with those of ropivacaine when providing sciatic nerve block for hallux valgus repair. Results from this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study demonstrate that 20 mL of either 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine provide comparable surgical block with prolonged postoperative analgesia.     

The continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% with 0.5 μg·mL−1 sufentanil provides effective postoperative analgesia after total hip replacement: a pilot study

PURPOSE: To assess the analgesic efficacy and functional outcome of postoperative epidural infusion of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil in a randomized, controlled trial. METHODS: Thirty-two ASA I-III patients undergoing elective total hip replacement (THR) were included. Lumbar epidural block using 0.75% ropivacaine was combined with either propofol sedation or general anesthesia for surgery. On arrival in the recovery room, the epidural infusion was commenced at a rate in mL calculated as follows: (height in cm - 100) x 0.1. Eleven patients received an epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% with 0.5 microg x mL(-1) sufentanil (Group R+S0.5), ten patients ropivacaine 0.1% with 0.75 microg x mL(-1) sufentanil (Group R+S0.75), and 11 patients ropivacaine 0.1% with 1 microg x mL(-1) sufentanil (Group R+S1) over a postoperative study period of 44 hr. All patients had access to iv piritramide via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Postel-Merle-d'Aubigné scoring system (PMA score) was assessed preoperatively, three weeks after surgery, and three months after surgery by an orthopedic surgeon blinded to study group. RESULTS: Motor block was negligible in all three groups. After eight hours of epidural infusion, sensory block had regressed completely in all patients. There was no significant difference with regard to visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (at rest: P = 0.55, on movement: P = 0.63), consumption of rescue medication (P = 0.99), patient satisfaction (P = 0.22), and the incidence of adverse events. All treatment regimens provided effective postoperative analgesia with only a minimal use of supplemental opioid PCA. There was no difference between groups regarding orthopedic PMA score (pain: P = 0.24, mobility: P = 0.65, and ability to walk: P = 0.44). CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine 0.1% with 0.5 microg x mL(-1) sufentanil for postoperative analgesia after THR provides efficient pain relief and, compared with 0.75 and 1 microg x mL(-1) sufentanil, reduces sufentanil consumption without compromise in patient satisfaction, VAS scores, and functional outcome.     

Pre‐operative brachial plexus block compared with an identical block performed at the end of surgery: a prospective,double‐blind,randomised clinical trial

We evaluated whether pre‐emptive analgesia with a pre‐operative ultrasound‐guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block resulted in better postoperative analgesia than an identical block performed postoperatively. Fifty‐two patients undergoing fixation of a fractured radius were included. All patients received general anaesthesia with remifentanil and propofol. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: a pre‐operative block or a postoperative block with 0.5 ml.kg^?1 ropivacaine 0.75%. After surgery, all patients received regular paracetamol plus opioids for breakthrough pain. Mean (SD) time to first rescue analgesic after emergence from general anaesthesia was 544 (217) min in the pre‐operative block group compared with 343 (316) min in the postoperative block group (p = 0.015). Postoperative pain scores were higher and more patients required rescue analgesia during the first 4 h after surgery in the postoperative block group. There were no significant differences in plasma stress mediators between the groups. Analgesic consumption was lower at day seven in the pre‐operative block group. Pain was described as very strong at block resolution in 27 (63%) patients and 26 (76%) had episodes of mild pain after 6 months. We conclude that a pre‐operative ultrasound‐guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block provides longer and better analgesia in the acute postoperative period compared with an identical postoperative block in patients undergoing surgery for fractured radius.     

The difficulties of ambulatory interscalene and intra-articular infusions for rotator cuff surgery: a preliminary report

PURPOSE: Rotator cuff repair may result in severe postoperative pain. We compared a continuous intra-articular infusion to a continuous interscalene block with ropivacaine for patients undergoing outpatient rotator cuff repair. METHODS: Seventeen patients were randomized to one of two groups: 1) interscalene block with 0.5% ropivacaine (40 mL) followed by a postoperative intra-articular infusion or; 2) interscalene block with 0.5% ropivacaine (40 mL) followed by a postoperative continuous interscalene infusion. Infusions were 0.2% ropivacaine at 10 mL x hr(-1) for both groups. Infusions were maintained for 48 hr. Patients were discharged on the day of surgery. Verbal analogue pain scores (VAS) and postoperative oxycodone consumption were measured for 48 hr. RESULTS: Eight patients (47%; four in each group) had side effects or logistical problems complicating care. The mean VAS scores at rest and with movement in the postanesthesia care unit and at 12 hr, 24 hr, and 48 hr were not different (P > 0.1). Inadequate analgesia was reported in 50-75% of all study patients. Time until first oxycodone use was similar between groups 829 min +/- 432 (interscalene) and 999 min +/- 823 (intra-articular; P = 0.6). Total oxycodone consumption was also similar 49 mg +/- 48 and 59 mg +/- 51 (P = 0.7), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the difficulties of ambulatory interscalene and intra-articular infusion for rotator cuff surgery. The high VAS scores and need for additional medical care suggest that intra-articular administration may not be reasonable for this magnitude of surgery. Further refinement of the perineural local anesthetic infusion is necessary to consistently provide analgesia after ambulatory rotator cuff surgery.