Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide concentration after subtenon injection

PURPOSE: To determine concentration of intravitreal triamcinolone after subtenon injection. DESIGN: Prospective series of vitrectomy candidates and laboratory investigation. METHODS: Twenty eyes of 20 patients received subtenon injections of triamcinolone acetonide, 40 mg, before vitrectomy surgery. Exclusion criteria included previous history of vitrectomy, triamcinolone injection, and retinal detachment. Posterior subtenon injections were performed using the standard technique. Undiluted vitreous specimens were obtained at the time of vitrectomy, which was performed from one to 29 days after subtenon injection. Intravitreal triamcinolone concentration was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: No complications were associated with subtenon injections. Intravitreal triamcinolone concentrations varied considerably, from zero in five eyes to a high of 4.94 microg/ml. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone concentrations vary considerably after subtenon injection. The findings indicate that subtenon injection can be a method for administering intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide that is comparable, in some cases, to the levels achieved after intravitreal injection.     

Vitreous prolapse and IOL dislocation during intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide

Background To report on procedure-related anterior segment complications during intravitreal injections.Methods In a prospective interventional case series, 614 eyes received a total of 723 intravitreal injections of about 20 mg triamcinolone acetonide (in 0.2 ml) after paracentesis and aqueous humor drainage for various indications.Results In three eyes (0.49% of all eyes) a vitreous prolapse occurred during the injection. In one eye, the vitreous prolapse was combined with dislocation of the intraocular lens (IOL). All three eyes were pseudophakic, showing an posterior capsule defect, and the IOL located in the ciliary sulcus. They were treated by translimbal vitrectomy, and one eye with reposition of the IOL. No other procedure-related postoperative complications were observed during injection or follow-up (7.8±7.1 months).Conclusions Intravitreal injections may cause a vitreous prolapse into the anterior chamber with or without IOL decentration or dislocation in predisposed eyes. Ophthalmologists should be aware of this possible complication and inform patients at risk.None of the authors received any financial support, or had any financial interest.     

Intraocular pressure after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide

AIM: To investigate the intraocular pressure (IOP) response after intravitreal injections of triamcinolone acetonide as treatment of intraocular neovascular or oedematous diseases. METHODS: The prospective consecutive non-comparative interventional case series study included 71 patients (75 eyes) with progressive exudative age related macular degeneration (n = 64 eyes) or diffuse diabetic macular oedema (n = 11 eyes), who received an intravitreal injection of 25 mg triamcinolone acetonide. Mean follow up time was 6.86 (SD 2.52) months (range 3.1-14.47 months). RESULTS: IOP increased significantly (p<0.001) from 15.43 (3.26) mm Hg preoperatively to a mean maximum of 23.38 (8.37) mm Hg (range 13-64 mm Hg) postoperatively. An IOP rise to values higher than 21 mm Hg was observed in 39 (52%) eyes. Elevation of IOP occurred about 2 months after the injection. Preoperative predictive factor for the rise in IOP was younger age (p=0.013). It was statistically independent of refractive error, presence of diabetes mellitus, and indication for the injection. In all but one eye, IOP could be lowered to the normal range with topical medication, without development of glaucomatous optic nerve head changes. In the eyes with an elevation of IOP, IOP normalised about 6 months after the injection, without further medication. Eyes undergoing repeatedly intravitreal injections of triamcinolone acetonide showed only an elevation of IOP, if after the first injection a rise of IOP had occurred. CONCLUSIONS: After intravitreal injections of 25 mg of triamcinolone acetonide, an IOP elevation can develop in about 50% of eyes, starting about 1-2 months after the injection. In the vast majority, IOP can be normalised by topical medication, and returns to normal values without further medication about 6 months after the injection.     

Cataract surgery after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide

PURPOSE: To report the clinical outcome of patients undergoing cataract surgery after one or repeated intravitreal injections of triamcinolone acetonide as treatment of intraocular neovascular or oedematous diseases. METHODS: The interventional clinical case series study included all patients (n=22) who presented with cataract which had progressed after a single or repeated intravitreal injection of 25 mg of triamcinolone acetonide as treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration (n=18) or diffuse diabetic macular oedema (n=4). Duration of the follow-up period was 3.76+/-4.99 months. With topical anaesthesia, the patients underwent standard cataract surgery including clear cornea incision, phakoemulsification and aspiration of the lens nucleus and cortex, and implantation of a foldable posterior chamber lens. The main outcome measures were frequencies of capsular rupture, vitreous loss, postoperative infectious endophthalmitis, secondary cataract, and decentration of the intraocular lens, visual acuity and intraocular pressure. RESULTS: Intraoperative dialysis of the lens zonules occurred in one (4.5%) eye and resulted in a loss of vitreous. Secondary cataract leading to Nd : YAG laser capsulotomy was observed in one (4.5%) eye. An optically significant decentration of the IOL or infectious endophthalmitis was not encountered in any patient. Visual acuity increased from 0.11+/-0.10 to 0.13+/-0.94 during the follow-up. Within 1 week after surgery, intraocular pressure was in the normal range in all the eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Cataract surgery after single or repeated intravitreal injection of 25 mg of triamcinolone acetonide does not harbour a markedly elevated frequency or a markedly changed profile of surgical complications.     

Intraocular pressure elevation after intravitreal or posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection

BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of intraocular steroids for the treatment of inflammatory, neovascular, proliferative, and edematous diseases, one of the side effects is raised intraocular pressure (IOP). In this study, we attempted to identify when IOP elevates, peaks, and returns to the preinjection baseline IOP after intravitreal or posterior sub-Tenon administration of triamcinolone acetonide, as well as the factors that might affect IOP. METHODS: Retrospective case review was undertaken of 69 patients (82 eyes), who received either a 4 mg intravitreal (16 eyes) or a 20 mg posterior sub-Tenon (66 eyes) triamcinolone acetonide injection. IOP assessment for each eye was completed at the preinjection baseline and at the first, third, and sixth month of follow-up. RESULTS: The mean IOP of all eyes increased significantly at each follow-up. The mean maximum elevation ratio from the baseline was 4.0 (SD 5.2) mm Hg. An elevation of 5 mm Hg or greater occurred in 28 eyes (34.1%). The maximum elevation correlated significantly with age (p < 0.01). The incidence of an elevation of 5 mm Hg or greater was significantly higher among patients younger than 60 years (p < 0.01) and relatively higher among female patients (p = 0.051). The mean IOP increased significantly at the first month after intravitreal injection but at all follow-up periods after posterior sub-Tenon injection. There was no significant difference in IOP elevation according to disease type, although eyes with diabetic retinopathy tended to be at higher risk of IOP elevation. Two eyes of two female patients, who had received posterior sub-Tenon injections for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy, required glaucoma surgery. INTERPRETATION: The IOP elevation of 5 mm Hg or greater observed in 34.1% of the eyes was consistent with past reports. IOP elevation was associated with patients of less than 60 years of age and with female sex, and it lasted longer after posterior sub-Tenon injection than after intravitreal injection. Careful assessment of IOP during a follow-up period of at least 6 months is paramount, especially in younger female patients after posterior sub-Tenon injection.     

Filtering bleb rupture after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide is effective in treating various ocular disorders associated with inflammation and swelling of the retina. Unfortunately, the use of intraocular steroids is also associated with several side effects, including increased intraocular pressure and the development of cataracts. This article describes a case of intravitreal steroid injection resulting in filtering bleb rupture due to an acute rise of intraocular pressure, expands on the mechanism, and provides possible ways to avoid such an occurrence in thin, cystic filtering blebs.     

Serum levels of triamcinolone acetonide after intravitreal injection

PURPOSE: To evaluate serum levels of triamcinolone acetonide after intravitreal high-dose injection. DESIGN: Prospective, interventional case series study. METHODS: For 20 consecutive patients, venous blood samples were taken before and 13 +/- 19 days (range 4 to 92) after an intravitreal injection of 20 to 25 mg triamcinolone acetonide as treatment of edematous macular diseases. RESULTS: Serum levels of triamcinolone acetonide did not differ significantly (P =.174; t test for paired matches) preoperatively (0 microg/l) and postoperatively (0.065 microg/l +/- 0.21 microg/l). In 18 eyes (90%), triamcinolone acetonide could not be detected in serum samples. For two patients (10%), serum samples taken 5 days and 7 days after the injection, respectively, contained 0.5 microg/l triamcinolone acetonide and 0.8 microg/l triamcinolone acetonide, respectively. CONCLUSION: After an intravitreal high-dose injection of 20 to 25 mg triamcinolone acetonide, triamcinolone acetonide is not, or only marginally, detectable in serum samples obtained within 4 to 92 days after the injection.     

Intraocular availability of triamcinolone acetonide after intravitreal injection

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the intraocular concentration of triamcinolone acetonide after intravitreal injection. METHODS: The prospective clinical interventional case series study included 17 patients who had received a 20 to 25-mg intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide as treatment for exudative age-related macular degeneration, diffuse diabetic macular edema, or retinal vein occlusions. During a secondary intraocular surgery taking place 4.1 weeks to 25.7 months after the intravitreal injection, aqueous humor samples were obtained. None of the eyes were vitrectomized. RESULTS: In the aqueous humor samples, triamcinolone acetonide was in low, but measurable, concentrations detected up to 1.5 years after the intravitreal injection. Concentrations found in samples obtained during the first 6 months, or 7 to 12 months, respectively, after the injection ranged between 3.0 microg/l and 436 microg/l, and between 0.0 microg/l and 11.2 microg/l, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After injection of triamcinolone acetonide, triamcinolone can be present in measurable concentrations up to 1.5 years after the application.     

Intraocular pressure elevation after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection

PURPOSE: This study investigated firstly the change of intraocular pressure (IOP) after injection of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) for the treatment of macular edema and secondly the factors that influence these changes. METHODS: A prospective, non-comparative study was performed in 60 patients at Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital from October 2003 to September 2004. All the patients received 4-mg IVTA injection. RESULTS: Mean IOP was elevated from the day after injection and peaked at 20.5 mmHg after 2 months (p=0.000). Twenty-six eyes (43.3%) showed significant IOP elevation. IOP was not controlled despite full glaucoma medication in 7 (11.7%) eyes. Two eyes underwent filtering surgery. Younger age was a statistically significant predictive factor for IOP elevation (p=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, patients who needed filtering surgery developed an IOP spike within one week after the injection. Therefore, clinicians should consider checking IOP at the end of the first week. Furthermore, greater cautions is mandatory with relatively younger patients.     

Intraocular pressure elevation after subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide during uveitis

INTRODUCTION: New therapeutic concepts in the management of ocular inflammation have led to the development of periocular and intravitreal injections. Such treatment modalities can induce intraocular pressure elevation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Periocular injections have been given to patients suffering from strictly unilateral or bilateral but asymmetrical and noninfectious posterior uveitis. A history of corticosteroid-induced glaucoma was a contraindication to such treatment. A retrospective review of cases who were given subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injection between May and October 2001 was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment and the risk of intraocular pressure elevation. Ocular pressure was measured before and after the injection and the efficacy of the treatment was evaluated by measurements of visual acuity and fluorescein angiography. RESULTS: One or several injections were given to 61 patients. Intraocular pressure rose in 13 patients (21.3%). Medical treatment was unsuccessful in three cases and surgical excision of periocular corticosteroid deposit was required. Therefore, intraocular pressure was controlled with no other medication. Treatment was considered effective in 32 patients (52.45%): improvement of visual acuity (more than two lines) or control of inflammation on fluorescein angiography. DISCUSSION: and conclusions: Periocular subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in posterior noninfectious uveitis is a safe procedure. Intraocular pressure elevation is not frequent and can be controlled through medical treatment or surgical excision of a residual deposit, in which pharmacologically active triamcinolone can be present several months after the injection.     

Pseudohypopyon following intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of a pseudohypopyon that developed after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide for choroidal neovascularization from age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: Observational case report. RESULTS: A 62-year-old woman received an intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of a choroidal neovascular membrane that developed as a result of age-related macular degeneration. A layer of yellowish deposits was observed in the anterior chamber 1 day after the injection. The patient denied any pain or reduced vision, and there was no redness noted on examination. The deposits cleared spontaneously on the fourth postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS: Pseudohypopyon may develop after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide. Distinguishing this from a true hypopyon is important because the treatment and prognosis are very different for the two conditions.     

Orbital abscess following posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide

Orbital cellulitis is a serious sight threatening and potentially life threatening condition which can be complicated by orbital abscess formation. Posterior subtenon (PST) injection of corticosteroid is commonly used in the treatment of posterior segment inflammation including post-operative macular oedema. We report a case of orbital abscess formation as a late complication of PST triamcinolone acetonide and discuss the presentation, diagnosis and management.     

Refractory severe ocular hypertension after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection

PURPOSE: To report a serious complication following intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection. METHODS: Observational case report. RESULTS: In 2 patients, secondary intractable severe ocular hypertension occurred 2 months after a single 4-mg intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide for macular edema. Both patients required trabeculectomy intervention to control intraocular pressure (IOP). CONCLUSION: We highlight the occurrence of intractable high IOP elevation as a serious complication 2 months after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. Cautious monitoring of IOP for several months after this therapy is recommended. The risks of this potentially devastating complication need to be weighed against the benefits of intravitreal triamcinolone in the individual patient.