Antitumor immune response to colorectal cancer antigen detected by the leukocyte adherence inhibition test (LAI) in groups at high risk for colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in western populations. As treatment outcome is highly correlated with stage at diagnosis, early detection is a very important task. Three high-risk groups for colorectal cancer (first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients; individuals with past history of colorectal neoplasms, polyps, or carcinoma; and patients with ulcerative colitis) were screened for colonic neoplasms. The study program included the leukocyte adherence inhibition test (LAI), a specific immune response test for colorectal cancer antigen; fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy; and guaiac impregnated slide test. The main finding was the detection of 92 positive LAI tests out of 451 high-risk individuals tested (20%), compared to eight positive tests out of 194 (4.1%) in a control group. Fifty-six colonic neoplasms were found out of 344 (16%) colonoscopies performed, most of them adenomatous polyps and a few carcinomas. Our findings, compared with the expected 2-3% neoplasms in low-risk groups, would prove that the screenees were indeed at high risk. However, only 11/56 (19%) of the polyps identified were LAI positive. The number of polyps found among LAI positive individuals were, so far, 11/92 (11%). The guaiac impregnated slide test for occult blood in the stool was performed in 221 screenees. Of these only 10 were positive (4.5%) compared with the average of 1% positive tests in low-risk groups.     

厦门市海沧区结直肠癌筛查结果分析

目的通过分析厦门市海沧区结直肠癌的筛查结果,探索筛查的结直肠癌最佳方案,以期达到对结直肠肿瘤的早发现、早诊断和早治疗。方法 自2008年12月—2010年10月,采用中国癌症基金会推荐的结直肠癌筛查方案,对海沧区4个行政村40~74岁常住居民结合问卷调查和连续粪便隐血试验(Fecal occult blood test,FOBT)进行初筛,共8179人,实际接受筛查6380人。高危人群接受全结肠镜检查。结果 经问卷调查和FOBT检测,获得结直肠癌高危人群1035例。81.06%的高危者接受全结肠镜检查,结直肠癌和腺瘤息肉及其他病变检出率分别为1.67%和23.96%。问卷调查及FOBT均阳性者结直肠癌检出率显著高于单纯问卷调查阳性者或单纯FOBT阳性者(P＜0.05);FOBT两次阳性者结直肠癌检出率显著高于FOBT阴性和FOBT单次阳性检出率(P＜0.05)。FOBT检测阳性次数与结直肠癌检出率和腺瘤息肉及其他病变检出率呈线性关系(P＜0.05)。结论 调查问卷和连续粪便隐血试验筛查可明显缩小高危人群,大大降低筛查的工作量。     

A pilot study of participation in faecal occult blood testing and screening colonoscopy after health education in Hong Kong.

Colorectal cancer is the second commonest cancer in Hong Kong. The screening behaviour of the Chinese population has not been assessed. The aim of this study is to report a pilot study of educating and subsequent evaluation of colorectal cancer screening behaviour in the Hong Kong Chinese population. Subjects were invited to attend a free health talk on colorectal cancer. Both self-paid faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and free screening colonoscopy were offered after the education programme. Of the participants taking part in the education programme 113/119 (95%) completed the FOBT. Of the FOBT 8/113 (7%) showed positive result and three patients had neoplasia at colonoscopy. Twenty-five patients with negative FOBT also completed colonoscopy; two had adenomas. Screening colonoscopy after FOBT was accepted by 28% of subjects. Those younger than 65 years and those with a positive FOBT (7/8 versus 25/105 for those with negative FOBT, P=0.0003) were more likely to agree to screening colonoscopy. In conclusion, health education is important for ensuring high acceptance and implementation of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong Chinese. FOBT is an acceptable and feasible screening method in Hong Kong.     

Rectal mucosal quantitative galactose oxidase-Schiff reaction as an early detection biomarker for colorectal cancer: comparison to fecal occult stool blood test

The galactose oxidase-Schiff (GOS) reaction detects D-galactose-β-[1,3]-N-acetyl-D-galactosamine. This is a T-antigen expressed in mucus from malignant cells and colonic mucosa adjacent to cancer but not in normal mucosa. Previous studies using a qualitative GOS assay proved to be of limited value for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. We used a newly developed quantitative GOS assay to determine its potential as an early detection biomarker for colorectal cancer. We completed a multi-center, prospective, cross-sectional cohort validation study consisting of 70 normal controls, 23 high-risk normal patients (polyp history or family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) with currently normal colonoscopy), 137 patients with adenomatous polyps, and 69 with colorectal cancers. Prior to colonoscopy, two samples of stool were collected via a rectal exam: one for FOBT, and one for GOS. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detecting colonic adenomas and cancer for normal colons, computed with logistic regression was 0.69 for GOS, 0.62 for FOBT, and 0.73 for GOS combined with FOBT. Adding GOS to FOBT did not significantly change the ROC of FOBT alone. GOS does not appear to be a suitable marker of colorectal neoplasia.     

Family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps as a risk factor for colorectal cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of common colorectal cancer among first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal adenomatous polyps. In a population screening programme, 59406 subjects underwent an immunochemical faecal occult blood test. In a medical check-up-based cross-sectional study, 6139 subjects had a colonoscopic examination. They were divided into two groups, according to the results of a questionnaire on family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps, and the detection rates for colorectal cancer were compared in the groups positive or negative for a family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps. In the screening programme-based cross-sectional study, the detection rate for colorectal cancer was 0.57% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38-0.76) and 0.15% (95% CI: 0.12-0.18) in subjects with and without a family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps, respectively, showing a significant difference in the detection rate for colorectal cancer between the two groups (P<0.05). In the medical check-up-based cross-sectional study, the detection rate for colorectal cancer was 2.31% (95% CI: 1.15-3.47) and 0.53% (95% CI: 0. 34-0.72) in subjects with and without a family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps, respectively, indicating a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). These findings indicate that first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal adenomatous polyps have an elevated risk for common colorectal cancer, and that people with a family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps should be considered as a priority group for colorectal cancer screening.     

Use of faecal markers in screening for colorectal neoplasia: a European group on tumor markers position paper

Several randomized controlled trials have shown that population‐based screening using faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) can reduce mortality from colorectal neoplasia. Based on this evidence, a number of countries have introduced screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) and high‐risk adenoma and many others are considering its introduction. The aim of this article is to critically review the current status of faecal markers as population‐based screening tests for these neoplasia. Most of the available faecal tests involve the measurement of either occult blood or a panel of DNA markers. Occult blood may be measured using either the guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) or a faecal immunochemical test (iFOBT). Although iFOBT may require a greater initial investment, they have several advantages over gFOBT, including greater analytical sensitivity and specificity. Their use results in improved clinical performance and higher uptake rates. Importantly for population screening, some of the iFOBTs can be automated and provide an adjustable cutoff for faecal haemoglobin concentration. However, samples for iFOBT, may be less stable after collection than for gFOBT. For new centres undertaking FOBT for colorectal neoplasia, the European Group on Tumour Markers recommends use of a quantitative iFOBT with an adjustable cutoff point and high throughput analysis. All participants with positive FOBT results should be offered colonoscopy. The panel recommends further research into increasing the stability of iFOBT and the development of improved and affordable DNA and proteomic‐based tests, which reduce current false negative rates, simplify sample transport and enable automated analysis.     

Evaluation of an automated immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal neoplasia detection in a Chinese population

BACKGROUND: Most commercial fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) used for colorectal carcinoma screening of Western populations are guaiac-based, manually developed, subjective, and sensitive to dietary components. Preliminary studies demonstrated the unsuitability of these tests for screening a Chinese population. The goal of the current study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of a human hemoglobin-specific automated immunochemical FOBT, the Magstream 1000/Hem SP (Fujirebio, Inc., Tokyo, Japan), in a Chinese population referred for colonoscopy. METHODS: Two hundred fifty consecutive patients who were referred for colonoscopy and met the study inclusion criteria provided samples for the immunochemical FOBT (without dietary restrictions) from two successive stool specimens. Tests were developed with an automated instrument that had an adjustable sensitivity threshold. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for detecting colorectal adenomas and carcinomas were calculated according to the manufacturer's instructions over a range of sensitivity levels. RESULTS: At the optimal threshold level, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for detection of significant colorectal neoplasia (adenomas >or= 1.0 cm and carcinomas) were 62%, 93%, and 44%, respectively. The test was easy to use, and results did not depend on operator experience. CONCLUSIONS: The automated immunochemical FOBT used in the current study was a robust, convenient, and useful tool for colorectal carcinoma screening in the study population.     

Measuring interval cancers in population-based screening using different assays of fecal occult blood testing: the District of Florence experience

The fecal occult blood test (FOBT) has demonstrated its efficacy in reducing mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). The guaiac-based FOBT has been criticized for its low sensitivity. In this study, two different assays for FOBT (guaiac or an immunochemical test based on reversed passive hemagglutination [RPHA]) were tested for comparison within a population-based screening program for colorectal cancer in the province of Florence (Italy). The proportional incidence method was used to calculate sensitivity for both FOBTs, according to rank of screening (first or repeat), age at entry (two groups of 50 to 59 and 60 to 70 years old) and lesion site (colon or rectum). When comparing FOBTs, the sensitivity multivariate Poisson regression was used to adjust for other variables. The sensitivity after the first 2 years was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI] 34% to 63%) for the guaiac test versus 82% (95% CI 67% to 92%) for RPHA. At multivariate analysis the risk of developing an interval cancer after a guaiac test is almost 3 times that after RPHA (rate ratio = 2.64; 95% CI 1.3 to 5.4). Our study confirms that RPHA is more sensitive than the guaiac test. The assumption that FOBT screening for CRC has to be based on a guaiac test should be reconsidered, and RPHA should be recommended as the standard FOBT for screening purposes.     

上海市社区居民大肠癌筛查便隐血检测效果分析

背景与目的：上海市为符合条件的居民提供免费的大肠癌筛查服务,通过对上海市居民大肠癌筛查中两次便隐血检测和后续诊断检查结果的分析,评价筛查中两次便隐血检测的效果,为基于人群的疾病筛查项目提供科学依据。方法：筛查的目标人群为50~74岁的上海居民,使用两次免疫法便隐血检测和危险度评估为初筛,初筛阳性者进行肠镜检查。结果：筛查期间,共有809 528人完成了两次便隐血检测,便隐血检测阳性者共有104 953人,其中第一次阳性的人数为47 421人,阳性率为5.9%,第二次阳性的人数为36 462人,阳性率为4.5%,两次阳性的人数为21 070人,阳性率为2.6%。便隐血检测阳性的筛查对象中,有49 339人接受了肠镜检查,肠镜检查顺应性为47.0%。两次阳性的筛查对象的肠镜参与率明显高于单次阳性的筛查对象（P<0.001）。在所有筛查出的大肠癌和癌前期病变中,仅进行一次便隐血检测可以诊断出大肠癌1 200例,占79.5%;发现癌前期病变3 777例,占68.1%。进行第二次便隐血检测可以多诊断出大肠癌310例,占20.5%;发现癌前期病变1 767例,占31.9%。结论：相比于单次便隐血检测, 进行两次便隐血检测的初筛可以更有效地检测出阳性对象,两次便隐血检测可提高后续肠镜检查的参与率,所检出的大肠癌和癌前期病变数量也均有所提高且增量成本较低。因此建议在以人群为基础的大肠癌筛查中采用两次或更多次数的便隐血检测,以提高筛查效率。     

Colorectal cancer screening programme by faecal occult blood test in Tuscany: first round results.

Screening with faecal occult blood test (FOBT) has been shown to be effective in reducing mortality from colorectal cancer. Tuscany was the first region in Italy in which a screening programme for colorectal cancer by FOBT was initiated region-wide. The aim of the paper was to describe organizational aspects, a quality control model and the results of this experience. From June 2000 to December 2001, 192583 subjects aged 50-70 were invited to undergo a 1-day immunochemical test without any dietary restriction. A total of 78505 subjects (41%) performed the screening test, of whom 4537 responders had a positive test result (5.8%). Among them, 1122 refused any form of assessment or underwent a colonoscopy outside the screening referral centres, with an overall assessment compliance of 75.3%. Malignancies were found in 193 patients and at least a high-risk adenomatous polyp in 692 patients. In about a quarter of the positive subjects who underwent assessment, cancer or high-risk adenoma was detected. In conclusion, data from this experience supported the feasibility of biennial colorectal screening programme by FOBT, particularly regarding invitation compliance and positivity rate. Further efforts are necessary to implement screening extension and to improve data collection.     

Unscheduled DNA synthesis in mononuclear leukocytes from patients with colorectal polyps

The mononuclear leukocytes from peripheral blood samples of individuals with (n = 30) and without (n = 48) colonic polyps were examined for their abilities to carry out unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) induced by N-acetoxy-N-2-fluorenylacetamide (N-AcO-2-FAA). Individuals with polyps had significantly reduced UDS values compared to the nonpolyp group (P less than 0.01). Furthermore, in a more comprehensive study, patients with hyperplastic polyps had N-AcO-2-FAA-induced UDS values not significantly different from control individuals who were asymptomatic and free from colonic disease as judged by complete colonoscopy. However, patients who had had adenomatous polyps in their large bowel had significantly reduced levels of N-AcO-2-FAA-induced UDS in their mononuclear leukocytes (P less than 0.005). When N-AcO-2-FAA binding to DNA determinations were made in parallel and DNA repair proficiency indices were calculated (i.e., N-AcO-2-FAA-induced UDS/N-AcO-2-FAA binding to DNA), the patients with adenomatous polyps were still shown to be deficient in carrying out DNA repair synthesis. Since adenomatous polyps of the large bowel are considered the premalignant lesion for colorectal cancer, we postulate that reduced UDS may be a genetically sensitive marker that is useful in studying the mechanisms of genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer.     

Long‐term risk of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy in a Danish gFOBT screening cohort

Faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is implemented in several countries. Approximately half of all screen positive persons have negative colonoscopy, but consensus is lacking on how these persons should be followed up. Health authorities in Denmark and The Netherlands recommend suspending screening for 8–10 years, while patients in UK are invited to screening after 2 years. In this cohort‐study, we followed 166,277 individuals invited to FOBT‐screening in 2005–2006 and a reference group comprising the remaining 1,240,348 Danes of the same age. We linked Danish population and health service registers to obtain information about colonoscopy outcome and incident CRC. We estimated CRC risk by colonoscopy outcome (adenoma, other colorectal pathology or negative colonoscopy) for the reference group, the screening group, and subgroups. Persons with positive screening FOBT followed by negative colonoscopy had the same long‐term CRC risk as persons with adenoma detected due to a positive screening FOBT (aHR 1.33, 95% CI: 0.65–2.71). We found no difference in the long‐term CRC risk between persons with negative colonoscopy after a positive FOBT screening test and the unscreened reference population (aHR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.62–1.78). Since FOBT screen positive persons in our study remained at average risk of CRC despite of a negative index colonoscopy, we question the safety of suspending FOBT screening for this group. It needs to be monitored whether recent efforts to improve colonoscopy quality have been successful in ensuring low CRC risk after negative colonoscopy also in FOBT positive persons.     

Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance

Screening and surveillance substantially reduce both the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. Screening of normal-risk individuals may be accomplished by several methods, including fecal occult blood testing, fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy, double contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy. New technologies for screening are being developed, such as fecal immunochemical testing for blood,fecal DNA testing, and virtual colonoscopy. Patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer, such as those with a positive family history, previous adenomatous polyps or cancer, and inflammatory bowel disease, should be offered more intensive evaluation and surveillance.     

Comparative screening with a sensitive guaiac and specific immunochemical occult blood test in an endoscopic study

BACKGROUND: HemoccultSENSA (HOS), the sensitive guaiac fecal occult blood test (FOBT) for colorectal neoplasia, is faulted for its low specificity, which might be improved by substituting or adding FlexSure OBT (FS), the immunochemical test for human hemoglobin. (Both tests are manufactured by Beckman-Coulter Inc., Primary Care Diagnostics, Palo Alto, CA.) The authors compared both FOBTs in an endoscopic study to determine which FOBT to recommend for a population-screening program. METHODS: Both FOBTs, without dietary restrictions, were prepared by 1410 screenees or nonbleeding symptomatic patients (3%). All underwent colonoscopy (51.8%) or flexible sigmoidoscopy (if asymptomatic and both FOBTs were negative). RESULTS: HOS sensitivity for significant neoplasia, cancers, or adenomas >/= 1 cm (20 cases) was similar to that of FS (50% vs. 35%, not significant). However, HOS specificity was lower (95% vs. 99%, confidence interval (CIs) 94-96 vs. 98-99, P < 0.05). In those 11 cases in which both HOS and FS were positive, specificity for significant neoplasia was 100% but sensitivity decreased to 25% (less than HOS alone, P < 0.05). HOS was more sensitive than FS for any neoplasia (55 cases), including adenomas < 1 cm (35% vs. 18%, CIs 22-47 vs. 8-28, P < 0.05), but less specific (96% vs. 99%, CIs 95-97 vs. 98-100, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Guaiac HOS, which does not require dietary restrictions, is significantly more sensitive for any colorectal neoplasm than the immunochemical FS; it identifies more adenomas with a specificity that is low but acceptable for population screening.     

Superior diagnostic performance of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin in a head-to-head comparison with guaiac based faecal occult blood test among 2235 participants of screening colonoscopy

There is increasing evidence that faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for haemoglobin offer a number of advantages over traditional guaiac based faecal occult blood tests (gFOBTs). However, evidence on diagnostic performance from direct comparisons with colonoscopy findings in all participants in the average risk population is still sparse. We aimed for a head-to-head comparison of three quantitative FITs with a gFOBT among participants of the German screening colonoscopy programme. Pre-colonoscopy stool samples and colonoscopy reports were obtained from 2235 participants of screening colonoscopy in 2005–2009. To enhance comparability of diagnostic performance of the various tests, we assessed sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios of FITs after adjusting the FIT cut-off haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations in such a way that FIT positivity rates equalled the positivity rate of the gFOBT. Colorectal cancer, advanced adenomas and other adenomas were found in 15 (0.7%), 207 (9.3%) and 398 (17.8%) participants. The gFOBT was positive in 111 (5.0%) participants, with sensitivities (specificities) for detecting colorectal cancer, any advanced neoplasm or any neoplasm of 33.3% (95.2%), 8.6% (95.4%) and 5.5% (95.2%). At the same positivity rate, all three FITs outperformed the gFOBT in all indicators. In particular, all sensitivities of FITs were approximately two to three times higher at increased levels of specificity. All differences were statistically significant, except for some of the performance indicators for colorectal cancer. In conclusion, FITs can detect much larger proportions of colorectal neoplasms even if their cut-offs are set to levels that ensure equally low positivity rates as gFOBT.     

A higher detection rate for colorectal cancer and advanced adenomatous polyp for screening with immunochemical fecal occult blood test than guaiac fecal occult blood test,despite lower compliance rate. A prospective,controlled, feasibility study

Immunochemical fecal occult blood test (FIT) is a new colorectal cancer (CRC) screening method already recommended by the American screening guidelines. We aimed to test the feasibility of FIT as compared to guaiac fecal occult blood test (G‐FOBT) in a large urban population of Tel Aviv. Average‐risk persons, aged 50–75 years, were offered FIT or G‐FOBT after randomization according to the socioeconomic status of their clinics. Participants with positive tests underwent colonoscopy. Participants were followed through the Cancer Registry 2 years after the study. Hemoccult SENSA? and OC‐MICRO? (three samples, 70 ng/ml threshold) were used. FIT was offered to 4,657 persons (Group A) and G‐FOBT to 7,880 persons (Group B). Participation rate was 25.9% and 28.8% in Group A and B, respectively (p < 0.001). Positivity rate in Group A and B was 12.7% and 3.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). Cancer found in six (0.49%) and eight (0.35%) patients of Group A and B, respectively (NS). Cancer registry follow‐up found missed cancer in five (0.22%) cases of Group B and none in Group A (NS). The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value for cancer in Group A and B were 100%, 85.9%, 100%, 3.9% and 61.5%, 96.4%, 99.8%, 9.1%, respectively. There was increased detection of advanced adenomatous polyp (AAP) by FIT, irrespective of age, gender, and socioeconomic status (Per Protocol: odds ratio 2.69, 95% confidence interval 1.6–4.5; Intention to Screen: odds ratio 3.16, 95% confidence interval 1.8–5.4). FIT is feasible in urban, average‐risk population, which significantly improved performance for detection of AAP and CRC, despite reduced participation.     

Emerging technologies in screening for colorectal cancer: CT colonography,immunochemical fecal occult blood tests,and stool screening using molecular markers

The American Cancer Society's (ACS) Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group held a workshop on new technologies for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps as part of a regular review of ACS guidelines for colorectal cancer screening. The Advisory Group formally reviewed CT colonography, immunochemical fecal occult blood tests (FOBT), and stool screening using molecular markers, and also addressed other technologies including capsule video endoscopy. With the exception of immunochemical stool testing, the ACS has determined that at this time there is insufficient evidence to recommend these technologies for routine colorectal cancer screening. Based on recommendations of the Advisory Group, only a minor modification has been made to the ACS's Recommendations for Screening and Surveillance of the Early Detection of Adenomatous Polyps and Colorectal Cancer.     

786例大肠腺瘤性息肉的癌变特征

目的:探讨大肠腺瘤性息肉的癌变特征.方法:对6 144例因有下消化道症状患者行结肠镜检查,记录大肠息肉患者的临床表现以及年龄、性别等资料,对大肠腺瘤性息肉的发生率、内镜下表现、病理类型进行分析.结果:1)结肠腺瘤性息肉占息肉患者总数的41.72%,男性占55.34%,女性占44.66%;年龄＞60岁患者占69.72%.临床症状中便血占66.28%.分布于左半结肠患者显著多于右半结肠患者(P＜0.001);2)重度不典型增生和癌变息肉直径＞2cm者占79.73%,分布于左半结肠患者也显著多于右半结肠患者(P＜0.0001).重度不典型增生和癌变率在腺瘤性息肉显著高于炎性息肉(P＜0.001);且在三种腺瘤性息肉间存在显著差异(P＜0.001).结论:结肠镜检查大肠腺瘤性息肉的检出率较高,临床症状以便血最多.其中重度不典型增生和癌变息肉具有一定的结肠镜下特征表现并且和息肉的病理类型密切相关.     

Adding familial risk assessment to faecal occult blood test can increase the effectiveness of population-based colorectal cancer screening

Background

The Dutch Health Council recently recommended the introduction of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme by faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) for individuals aged 55-75 at population risk of CRC. Individuals at an increased familial CRC risk (?2 times population risk) should be identified at a younger age, so they and their relatives can receive earlier, more intensive surveillance instead of FOBT.

Aims

To determine the percentage of participants with a positive FOBT in a CRC screening programme with an increased familial CRC risk.

Methods

In a population-based study, 10,569 individuals aged 50-75 received an FOBT. Individuals with a positive FOBT were invited for colonoscopy and familial risk assessment. Participants with an average familial CRC risk were compared to those with an increased risk. Increased familial CRC risk was defined as a cumulative lifetime risk of CRC of at least 10%.

Results

Of 6001 participants, 430 had a positive FOBT, of whom 324 (63% males; mean age 63 years) completed colonoscopy and familial risk assessment. CRC (n = 22) and/or advanced adenomas (n = 122) were found in 133 participants. Familial CRC risk was increased in 6% of participants with a positive FOBT. No significant differences were found between participants with an average versus an increased familial CRC risk.

Conclusion

Six percent of participants with a positive FOBT had an increased familial CRC risk. Identifying at-risk participants enables them and their relatives to undergo regular colonoscopies. Adding familial risk assessment to FOBT screening may thus prevent a substantial number of CRCs.