Influence of proprioceptive input from leg, thigh, trunk and neck muscles on the equilibrium of standing]

To investigate and compare the roles of proprioceptive input from the leg, thigh, trunk and neck muscles on equilibrium, we performed static posturography in 50 normal subjects in the standing position on a force platform by applying vibratory stimulations to the muscles. The length of the displacement of the center of gravity, maximum sway length and sway area were measured. The amplitude of the body sway was maximum when the stimulation was applied to the dorsal neck. The forward shift of the center of gravity was also marked by stimulation applied to the dorsal neck. The amplitude of the body sway on stimulation of the leg muscles was also marked, although less than that of dorsal neck stimulation. The backward shift during stimulation of the gastrocnemius and the forward shift during stimulation of the anterior tibialis were remarkable. The results indicate that the leg muscles, which directly regulate the movement of the ankle joint, and the dorsal neck muscles, which change the static equilibrium through the central nervous system, are important for maintaining the standing posture.     

The importance of cervical muscles in responses of galvanic body sway test

Body sway in normal subjects was analyzed by means of various methods to study a role of cervical muscles in galvanic body sway test. Galvanic stimulation through the retro-auricular electrode induced an initial response and a deviation response in body sway. When the anodal stimulation was given through the right retro-auricle during standing, a deviation response toward the right side was observed. While keeping a posture weighted on one foot, the stimulation induced a similar response. The stimulation during squatting produced also a deviation response toward the right side. When the head was rotated to the right, the stimulation produced backward responses. When rotated to the left, it produced forward responses. Even without galvanic stimulation, similar responses were also induced by some other method, for example, inclining the head to one side. Galvanic stimulation while sitting resulted in slight but apparent head inclination. The results suggested that cervical muscles played an important role in galvanic body sway test. Initial and deviation responses appeared to be secondarily produced by changes in the cervical muscular tension.     

Influence of Neck Proprioception on Vibration-induced Postural Sway

Objective --Several reports have shown that the direction of the postural responses induced by vestibular stimulation is affected by the positions of the neck and torso. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the postural responses to vibratory proprioceptive stimulation of the calf muscles are affected by the position of the head and thus by proprioceptive and vestibular information from the neck and head. Material and Methods --Ten normal subjects were exposed to vibratory proprioceptive stimulation of the calf muscles when the head was maintained in five different positions: in a neutral position facing forwards, with the head turned to the right or left sides or with the head tilted backwards or forwards. Body movements were evaluated by analyzing the anteroposterior and lateral torques induced towards the supporting surface. Results --The analysis showed that only the anteroposterior body sway was significantly affected by the position of the head. The anteroposterior postural responses were primarily increased during the tests with the head tilted backwards or forwards, whereas the postural responses were unaffected by head torsion towards the sides. The lateral responses were primarily affected by vision and not by the position of the head. Conclusion --The findings suggest that the responses evoked by vibratory proprioceptive stimulation of the calf muscles may be affected by different mechanisms, either by purely proprioceptive information or by an interaction between proprioceptive and vestibular information. Moreover, the increasing difference between the test conditions over time suggests that fatigue of the neck muscles may be one of the factors affecting the responses induced by the perturbations.     

Influence of vibration to the neck, trunk and lower extremity muscles on equilibrium in normal subjects and patients with unilateral labyrinthine dysfunction

To investigate the role of proprioceptors of different skeletal muscles in postural control, in normal subjects and patients with unilateral labyrinthine dysfunction (ULD), the effect of vibration on these muscles was studied by postulography. The subjects comprised 59 normal subjects and 12 patients with ULD due to resection of acoustic tumours. Sagittal body sway was observed during vibration to the triceps surae, tibialis anterior and upper dorsal neck muscles. No significant change in sway was observed in the frontal plane in normal subjects. Significant differences between normal subjects and patients were found on stimulation of the muscle groups of triceps surae and biceps femoris during vibration. In patients with ULD, vibration to the dorsal neck muscles caused a deviation towards the diseased side. It can be speculated that the upper dorsal neck muscle plays an important role in maintaining the body balance in the frontal plane in patients with ULD. On the other hand, the lower extremity muscles, especially the muscles on the dorsal side of the body, play a significant role in adjusting the standing posture in the sagittal plane.     

Influence of Vibration to the Neck,Trunk and Lower Extremity Muscles on Equilibrium in Normal Subjects and Patients with Unilateral Labyrinthine Dysfunction

To investigate the role of proprioceptors of different skeletal muscles in postural control, in normal subjects and patients with unilateral labyrinthine dysfunction (ULD), the effect of vibration on these muscles was studied by postulography. The subjects comprised 59 normal subjects and 12 patients with ULD due to resection of acoustic tumours. Sagittal body sway was observed during vibration to the triceps surae, tibialis anterior and upper dorsal neck muscles. No significant change in sway was observed in the frontal plane in normal subjects. Significant differences between normal subjects and patients were found on stimulation of the muscle groups of triceps surae and biceps femoris during vibration. In patients with ULD, vibration to the dorsal neck muscles caused a deviation towards the diseased side. It can be speculated that the upper dorsal neck muscle plays an important role in maintaining the body balance in the frontal plane in patients with ULD. On the other hand, the lower extremity muscles, especially the muscles on the dorsal side of the body, play a significant role in adjusting the standing posture in the sagittal plane.     

Influence of neck proprioception on vibration-induced postural sway

OBJECTIVE: Several reports have shown that the direction of the postural responses induced by vestibular stimulation is affected by the positions of the neck and torso. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the postural responses to vibratory proprioceptive stimulation of the calf muscles are affected by the position of the head and thus by proprioceptive and vestibular information from the neck and head. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten normal subjects were exposed to vibratory proprioceptive stimulation of the calf muscles when the head was maintained in five different positions: in a neutral position facing forwards, with the head turned to the right or left sides or with the head tilted backwards or forwards. Body movements were evaluated by analyzing the anteroposterior and lateral torques induced towards the supporting surface. RESULTS: The analysis showed that only the anteroposterior body sway was significantly affected by the position of the head. The anteroposterior postural responses were primarily increased during the tests with the head tilted backwards or forwards, whereas the postural responses were unaffected by head torsion towards the sides. The lateral responses were primarily affected by vision and not by the position of the head. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the responses evoked by vibratory proprioceptive stimulation of the calf muscles may be affected by different mechanisms, either by purely proprioceptive information or by an interaction between proprioceptive and vestibular information. Moreover, the increasing difference between the test conditions over time suggests that fatigue of the neck muscles may be one of the factors affecting the responses induced by the perturbations.     

Cervical muscle afferents play a dominant role over vestibular afferents during bilateral vibration of neck muscles

A previous study showed that vibratory stimulation of neck muscles in humans induced short-latency electromyographic (EMG) activation of lower leg muscles, producing postural reactions at the feet. These findings indicated that cervical proprioception contributes to stabilization of stance through rapidly integrated pathways. However, as vibration may excite both proprioceptive and vestibular afferents, and because of the proximity of neck muscles to the vestibular apparatus, neck muscle vibration could also have activated the vestibular system thereby contributing to the effect observed. To investigate any possible contribution of vestibular stimulation, vibratory stimuli were applied bilaterally and separately to the splenius muscles of the neck and the planum mastoideum overlying the vestibular organs. Ten normal subjects, with eyes closed, were exposed to vibratory stimulation of two different amplitudes and frequencies. Responses were assessed by EMG activity recorded from tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius muscles of both legs and by changes in center of pressure as measured by a force platform. Results indicated that vibration induced reproducible EMG and postural responses in the anteroposterior direction, particularly on cessation of vibration. EMG and postural responses were considerably lower and less consistent with mastoid vibration compared with neck muscles vibration. Previous reports suggest that vibratory stimulation could propagate to the vestibular organs and generate a vestibular-induced postural activation. However, our findings indicate that cervical muscles afferents play a dominant role over vestibular afferents when vibration is directed towards the neck muscles.     

Galvanically induced body sway in the anterior-posterior plane

Anterior-posterior body sway was evoked with monopolar bi-aural galvanic stimulus of the vestibular nerves in normal subjects and recorded with a force platform, two experiments being conducted. In an experiment of paired design, 9 normal subjects showed an increase in anterior-posterior sway as compared with lateral sway when exposed to the stimulus. In a second experiment another group of 10 normal subjects were exposed to a galvanic stimulus between a neck electrode and two electrodes placed on the arms, but there was no change in the relationship between anterior-posterior and lateral body sway. It is concluded that monopolar galvanic stimulus of the vestibular nerves can induce anterior-posterior body sway, a phenomenon which can be utilised to investigate the vestibulo-spinal contribution in postural control in the anterior-posterior plane.     

Effect of head orientation on human postural stability following unilateral vestibular ablation.

Effective interpretation of vestibular inputs to postural control requires that orientation of head on body is known. Postural stability might deteriorate when vestibular information and neck information are not properly coupled, as might occur with vestibular pathology. Postural sway was assessed in unilateral vestibulopathic patients before and acutely, 1, 4, and 18+ months after unilateral vestibular ablation (UVA) as well as in normal subjects. Postural equilibrium with eyes closed was quantified as scaled pk-pk sway during 20 s trials in which the support surface was modulated proportionally with sway. Subjects were tested with the head upright and facing forward, turned 45 degrees right, and 45 degrees left. Equilibrium was uninfluenced by head orientation in normal subjects. In contrast, patients after UVA showed both a general reduction in stability and a right/left head orientation-dependent asymmetry. These abnormalities adaptively recovered with time. It is concluded that vestibular inputs to postural control are interpreted within a sensory-motor context of head-on-body orientation.     

Effect of proprioceptor stimulation on postural stability in patients with peripheral or central vestibular lesion

Body sway in upright stance at rest and after inducing proprioceptor stimulation, elicited by vibration applied to the calf or neck muscles, was studied in 11 patients with peripheral lesion and in 17 patients with central vestibular lesion. The responses were compared with those of 20 normal subjects. Vibratory stimulus was applied at five different frequencies, ranging from 32 to 150 Hz, and at a constant amplitude of 2.1 mm. Postural stability was measured with a force platform in terms of average deviation of body position (ADBP) analyzed in relation to the individual maximum support distance in the anterio-posterior direction. In patients with peripheral vestibular lesion ADBP was moderately increased, compared to normal subjects, when the calf muscles were exposed to vibration under eyes closed conditions (i.e. no visual information available); stimulation of neck muscles both under eyes open and eyes closed conditions and stimulation of calf muscles with open eyes produced an ADBP of the same magnitude as in controls. In patients with central vestibular lesion, proprioceptor stimulation of calf and neck muscles caused increased ADBP whether with eyes open or closed. The ADBP induced by stimulation of neck muscles was significantly greater in patients with a central lesion than in those with a peripheral vestibular lesion. The results indicate that patients with peripheral lesion differ from those with central vestibular lesion in their reaction to proprioceptor stimulus; and that in patients with central vestibular lesion proprioceptor stimulation of the neck muscles produces disproportionately powerful cervico-collic reflexes.     

Long-term postural abnormalities in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a disorder in which patients suffer from acute rotatory vertigo due to the presence of free otoconial debris migrating into one or more semicircular canals during head movements and resulting in abnormal stimulation of the ampullary crest. A prolonged loss of equilibrium of unclear origin is also present. Static posturography is a useful tool for the study of postural control systems and their role in these abnormalities. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the frequency of body sway and long-term instability of BPPV patients by posturography frequency analysis. Twenty patients with canalithiasis of the posterior semicircular canal and 20 normal controls were subjected to static posturography. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Patients were tested 1 h after diagnosis, and 3 days and 12 weeks after the characteristic Epley repositioning maneuver. Patients with BPPV showed significantly increased body sway both on lateral (X) and anteroposterior (Y) planes compared to normal subjects. Corporal oscillation with a broad-frequency spectrum was observed in both closed and open eye tests. The repositioning maneuver decreased the X plane body sway, while the anteroposterior sway was unchanged. Twelve weeks after treatment, a normalization of the anteroposterior sway was observed. Results of this study suggest that the long-term postural disturbance associated with BPPV differs from the acute disequilibrium that subsides after canalith repositioning: the former is a sagittal plane/broad spectrum body sway, while the latter is primarily a frontal plane/low frequency sway. The Epley maneuver was shown to reduce frontal sway, a postural abnormality that might therefore be linked to posterior semicircular canal function. Conversely, the observed sagittal body sway was only partially relieved by the restoration of canal function, and therefore, may be more related to the chronic dizziness observed in these patients.     

Direction of galvanically-induced vestibulo-postural responses during active and passive neck torsion

The direction of a postural response induced by galvanic vestibular stimulation depends on the head and trunk position. The relative importance of afferent information (proprioception) and efferent motor command/corollary discharge is unknown. We studied the direction of body sway evoked by galvanic vestibular stimulation in 9 healthy subjects during active and passive head positioning at 0 degrees frontal position, 35 degrees to the left, and 75 degrees to the right, using a custom-built collar. At 0 degrees and 75 degrees there were no significant differences in sway direction between active and passive head positioning. The galvanic stimulation invoked sway toward the anode, mainly in the inter-aural direction. The sway direction differed significantly between active and passive positioning at 35 degrees to the side (p < 0.05). When the head was actively kept in this position, the body sway was mainly in an inter-aural direction. The sway shifted to a naso-occipital direction when the head was passively positioned at 35 degrees. Our results indicate that the afferent proprioceptive information has the largest influence on the direction of the galvanically-induced postural response, although some dependence on efferent motor commands and non-linear cervical proprioception cannot be ruled out entirely.     

Direction of Galvanically-induced Vestibulo-postural Responses during Active and Passive Neck Torsion

The direction of a postural response induced by galvanic vestibular stimulation depends on the head and trunk position. The relative importance of afferent information (proprioception) and efferent motor command/corollary discharge is unknown. We studied the direction of body sway evoked by galvanic vestibular stimulation in 9 healthy subjects during active and passive head positioning at 0° frontal position, 35° to the left, and 75° to the right, using a custom-built collar. At 0° and 75° there were no significant differences in sway direction between active and passive head positioning. The galvanic stimulation invoked sway toward the anode, mainly in the inter-aural direction. The sway direction differed significantly between active and passive positioning at 35° to the side (p&lt;0.05). When the head was actively kept in this position, the body sway was mainly in an inter-aural direction. The sway shifted to a naso-occipital direction when the head was passively positioned at 35°. Our results indicate that the afferent proprioceptive information has the largest influence on the direction of the galvanically-induced postural response, although some dependence on efferent motor commands and non-linear cervical proprioception cannot be ruled out entirely.     

Adaptation of multi-segmented body movements during vibratory proprioceptive and galvanic vestibular stimulation

Control of orthograde posture and use of adaptive adjustments constitutes essential topics of human movement control, both in maintenance of static posture and in ensuring body stability during locomotion. The objective was to investigate, in twelve normal subjects, how head, shoulder, hip and knee movements and torques induced towards the support surface were affected by vibratory proprioceptive and galvanic vestibular stimulation, and to investigate whether movement pattern, body posture and movement coordination were changed over time. Our findings suggest that the adaptive process to enhance stability involves both alteration of the multi-segmented movement pattern and alteration of body posture. The magnitude of the vibratory stimulation intensity had a prominent influence on the evoked multi-segmented movement pattern. The trial conditions also influenced whether the posture were altered and if these posture adjustments were done directly at stimulation onset or gradually over a longer period. Moreover, the correlation values showed that the subjects, primarily during trials with vibratory stimulation alone, significantly increased the body movement coordination at stimulation onset and maintained this movement pattern throughout the stimulation period. Furthermore, when exposed to balance perturbations the test subjects synchronized significantly the head and torso movements in anteroposterior direction during all trial conditions.     

The deviation of the body's sway center with galvanic stimulation

We investigated galvanic body sway of ten healthy adults and eight patients by using the averaging program for measuring T1 and T2, which were latencies at the onset and at the cutoff of galvanic stimulation, respectively, and the plotting program, which adopted 1.73 sec as T1 and 0.39 sec as T2, for calculating the coordinates of the body's sway center. We estimated galvanic body sway with the difference between the coordinate of the body's sway center during stimulation and that during no stimulation. The deviation in lateral direction on the healthy subjects ranged from 0.7 or 0.9 to 2.1 cm at right- or left-side stimulation. One of the patients with peripheral disorders revealed differences between right- and left-side stimulation. The other patients did not reveal any differences. In antero-posterior direction six of the healthy subjects deviated backward at right-side stimulation and nine subjects deviated backward at left-side stimulation. The patients with peripheral disorders did not reveal any differences. The other patients revealed some differences. Waves computed by the averaging program do not always show the quantity of galvanic body sway. The deviation of the body's sway center shows the quantity of body sway consistently. The body's sway center is considered to be a suitable parameter in the galvanic body sway test for statistical analysis.     

Gait disturbance in aging and equilibrium disorders--body sway research no. 45

Initiation of gait in relation to aging in normal adults and patients with equilibrium disorders were examined by a large force platform to analyze trace of the center of foot pressure while walking with eyes open. Sixty normal adults and fifty-one patients with equilibrium disorders underwent examinations. Normal adult subjects were divided into three groups by depending on the age; the young age group (20-39 years), the middle age group (40-64 years), and the aged group (over 65 years). The patients consisted of peripheral vestibular disorders and central equilibrium disorders. Analyzed items were step length (mm), step width (mm), cadence (steps/min), walking speed (m/min), step length/body height (step length ratio), step width/step length, and LG/LS. The aged group showed characteristic gait pattern: marked shortness of step length, broadness of step width, slight decrease in cadence, slowness of walking speed and increased body sway during walking. Instable body sway was expressed by step width/step length and LG/LS. No statistically significant difference was obtained between the normal young and the normal middle age groups. The patients with central equilibrium disorders showed shortness of step length in comparison with contemporary normal generations. Both patients with peripheral and central disorders revealed remarkable lower walking speed. In the patients with central disorders the walking was characterized with increase of body sway during their walking.     

Effects of restrained cervical mobility on voluntary eye movements and postural control

The effects of restrained cervical mobility on pursuit eye movements (PEMS), voluntary saccades and postural control, as measured by posturography, were studied in 11 healthy subjects whose cervical spine movement had been restrained for 5 days by means of a rigid neck-collar. At day 5 mean peak velocity of voluntary saccades at amplitudes of 40 degrees and 60 degrees was significantly reduced, as was mean peak gain of PEMs at a stimulus velocity of 50 degrees/s; the variance of body position in vibration-induced body sway was significantly increased, but there was no difference in variance of galvanically-induced body sway or in velocity of vibration-induced body sway. The results suggest that restriction of cervical movements per se affects voluntary eye movements, a conclusion also consistent with findings in patients with tension headache. Restriction of cervical movement only marginally affects postural control.     

Postural responses evoked by sinusoidal galvanic stimulation of the labyrinth. Influence of head position

In 15 healthy subjects we studied body sway reactions to sinusoidal 0.3 Hz binaural bipolar galvanic current up to 2 mA under three conditions. With the head forward and eyes closed, there is only a periodic lateral displacement of the centre of gravity, following the stimulation with a phase lag. In two other conditions, the head turned to the left or to the right without trunk torsion, the direction of sway was modified in such a way that there were mainly anteroposterior movements. It is thought that this experiment shows the modulatory influence of neck afferents on the direction of vestibulospinal motor effects in man.     

Effects of hypothermic anesthesia of the feet on vibration-induced body sway and adaptation

The aim of this study was to investigate the significance of information from the plantar cutaneous mechanoreceptors in postural control and whether postural control could compensate for reduced cutaneous information by adaptation. Sixteen healthy subjects were tested with eyes open or eyes closed with hypothermic and normal feet temperature during posturography where body sway was induced by vibratory proprioceptive stimulation towards both calf muscles. The hypothermic anesthesia was obtained by cooling the subject's feet in ice water for 20 minutes. Body movements were evaluated by analyzing the anteroposterior and lateral torques induced towards the supporting surface by a force platform during the posturography tests. The reduction of cutaneous sensor information from the mechanoreceptors of the feet significantly increased the vibration-induced torque variance mainly in the anteroposterior direction. However, the effects of disturbed mechanoreceptors information was rapidly compensated for through postural adaptation and torque variance was in level with that without anesthesia within 50 to 100 seconds of stimulation, both when standing with eyes open and eyes closed. Our findings suggest that somatosensory input from mechanoreceptors in the foot soles contribute significantly in maintaining postural control, but the sensory loss could be compensated for.     

Visual influence on postural control,with and without visual motion feedback

Body sway was investigated in 20 healthy subjects to determine whether visual input must contain motion feedback information from the surroundings in order to influence postural control. Posturography was used to record body sway under the following visual conditions: eyes open with or without a restricted visual field; eyes open in ganzfield white light; eyes open in darkness with a head-fixed visual target; eyes open in darkness; and eyes closed in darkness. Stance was perturbed by means of a pseudorandomly applied vibratory stimulation to the calf muscles. Least sway was found with eyes open in an unrestricted visual field but increased in a restricted visual field. Greatest sway was found without visual motion feedback, i.e. under the following conditions: eyes closed; eyes open in darkness; eyes open in ganzfield white light; and with a head-mounted fixation point. Sway was significantly (p < 0.05) greater with eyes open in darkness compared with eyes closed during the initial 50 s with perturbations. After 150 s, sway was almost identical under the four test conditions without visual motion feedback. Standing with eyes open in darkness was initially a disadvantage compared with having the eyes closed. The postural control system may be programmed to expect visual feedback information when the eyes are open, which may delay changes in postural strategy.