Sensitivity of a modified version of the ARCHITECT Anti-HCV test in detecting samples with immunoblot-confirmed, low-level antibody to hepatitis C virus.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Compliance with current regulations regarding the prevention of hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission in the blood transfusion setting requires the use of sensitive assays for HCV antibody (anti-HCV) detection, which should, ideally, identify any donor having had prior contact with the virus. Therefore, low-level anti-HCV positive blood units should be detected by the screening assays, even those reflecting a past and resolved infection. To assess the sensitivity of two versions of an automated chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) for anti-HCV screening (ARCHITECT Anti-HCV), 113 single serum samples containing low levels of anti-HCV, assessed by two immunoblot tests, were selected from 3686 samples received for confirmation of HCV infection by a reference laboratory over a 2-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The panel included 17 samples with HCV RNA detected by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and 96 PCR negative samples with either positive or indeterminate (anti-Core and anti-NS3 alone) results by immunoblot. RESULTS: All but 13 specimens (100/113, 88.5%) were detected by the current version of the ARCHITECT Anti-HCV assay and 10 additional samples (110/113, 97.3%) tested positive in a modified version of the test. CONCLUSION: The results showed that the modification introduced in the ARCHITECT Anti-HCV assay achieves a significant sensitivity improvement including samples with low-level anti-HCV which are either PCR positive or negative.     

Multicenter evaluation of a fully automated third-generation anti-HCV antibody screening test with excellent sensitivity and specificity

Early detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an important step in preventing progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Serologic assays for anti-hepatitis C (anti-HCV) antibody are valuable first-line tests in the screening and diagnosis of HCV infection. The aim of this multicenter study was to compare the Elecsys^® Anti-HCV assay with alternative CE-marked Anti-HCV antibody assays against a range of samples that included 1,138 blood donors, 3,553 unselected routine daily specimens, and 46 pre-selected seroconversion panels. Specificity of the Elecsys Anti-HCV assay was 99.5% with blood donor samples and 99.4% with routine clinical specimens. These were similar to those obtained with the Prism^® Anti-HCV, Architect^® Anti-HCV assay, ADVIA^® Centaur Anti-HCV assay and Vitros^® Eci aHCV assays. Seroconversion sensitivity for the Elecsys Anti-HCV assay was similar to that of the Architect Anti-HCV, AxSYM HCV version 3.0, ADVIA Centaur Anti-HCV, and Vitros Eci aHCV assays. In fact, seroconversion testing on 46 commercially available panels showed that the difference in first detecting a positive blood sample was less than one day between assays (not statistically significant). The Elecsys Anti-HCV assay as well as the Architect, Prism, and Vitros Anti-HCV immunoassays revealed a seroconversion sensitivity of 100%, whereas the ADVIA Centaur HCV immunoassay showed a sensitivity of only 97.5% (39/40). Overall, the performance of the Elecsys Anti-HCV assay was similar to the performances of the comparator CE-marked Anti-HCV antibody assays.     

Evaluation of the new ARCHITECT Rubella IgM assay.

BACKGROUND: Rubella infections are usually characterized by mild self-limiting courses in immunocompetent individuals. However, infections in pregnant women during the first trimester of pregnancy pose a high risk of congenital rubella syndrome possibly resulting in severe defects in the unborn child. Rubella serology of a primary rubella infection is mainly determined by diagnostic confirmation of levels of specific IgM. STUDY DESIGN: Here, we report on the performance of the Rubella IgM assay in development on the ARCHITECT instrument, a fully automated high throughput chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay platform. Sensitivity was examined using commercially available seroconversion panels from vaccinated individuals; specificity was addressed by testing populations of pregnant women, blood donors and hospitalized patients. In addition, the potential for assay interference was evaluated by testing samples of several disease states. As methods of comparison AxSYM, BioMérieux VIDAS and Behring Rubella IgM assays were used. RESULTS: The study demonstrates that the ARCHITECT Rubella IgM assay shows improved specificity compared to AxSYM and Behring. Seroconversion sensitivity is equivalent on all assays evaluated. CONCLUSION: Together with high throughput, optimized specificity and suppression of rheumatoid factor (RF) interference the ARCHITECT assay provides a useful improvement for the diagnosis of rubella serology.     

Evaluation of two commercial enzyme immunoassays for diagnosis of hepatitis C in the conditions of a virology laboratory

BACKGROUND: Most studies which evaluate antibody detection assays are conducted on blood donors specimens, i.e healthy individuals. Sera collected in patients, vs healthy individuals, can make serological tests difficult because of possible non specific reactions interfering with serological tests. The aim of this work was to compare the specificity and the sensitivity of two commercial automated assays for the detection of hepatitis C virus antibody, Monolisa anti-HCV Plus on the Evolis automate (Biorad) and Axsym anti-HCV 3.0 (Abbott). PATIENTS AND METHOD: The prospective study of specificity included 2020 routine serum samples sent to our virology laboratory. The sensitivity was established with eight commercially available HCV seroconversion panels. RESULTS: The Monolisa and the Axsym assays showed a specificity of 99.64 and 99.12%, respectively. Of 49 specimens from eight commercially available HCV seroconversion panels, the number of positive results was 21 and 24 for the two tests, respectively. CONCLUSION: A statistical analysis of specificity and sensitivity results proved no significant difference between the two tests. Nevertheless, the Monolisa kits could be preferred for its more homogeneous sensitivity than the Axsym test and for its apparent better specificity. The final choice of a kit should also take into account the easiness to perform and an optimal integration in the usual practice of the concerned laboratory.     

A chemiluminescent, magnetic particle-based immunoassay for the detection of hepatitis C virus core antigen in human serum or plasma

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) exposure in blood donors is determined serologically by the detection of anti-HCV antibodies in serum or plasma. However, a "window" period of 30-70 days after exposure exists where specific antibodies to HCV antigens are not detected. The use of nucleic acid testing for the detection of HCV RNA or antigen testing for the detection of HCV core protein have resulted in dramatic reductions in the pre-seroconversion window period. In this study, an automated HCV core antigen detection test was developed. This magnetic microparticle-based assay utilizes anti-HCV core monoclonal antibody to capture antigen present in human serum or plasma. Captured antigen is then detected using an anti-HCV core monoclonal antibody conjugated with a chemiluminescent compound. The specificity of this assay was established at 99% upon testing a population of normal volunteer blood donors. Sensitivity was determined by testing 16 commercially available HCV seroconversion panels representing genotypes 1a, 1b, 2b, and 3a. In each panel tested, HCV core antigen was detected prior to anti-HCV antibody, resulting in a reduction of the window period by greater than 23 days on average, and greater than 34 days on panels initially NAT negative. In addition, HCV core antigen was detected in >97% of HCV RNA positive/antibody negative specimens, exhibiting sensitivity nearly equivalent to nucleic acid testing in the pre-seroconversion window period for the panels examined.     

Clinical performance evaluation of Elecsys HIV Duo,Anti-HCV II,HBsAg II,Anti-HBc II,and Syphilis assays for routine screening of first-time blood donor samples at a French blood donation center

ObjectivesImplementing fully automated analyzers has become a crucial safety step in blood donation centers. The Elecsys® assays were evaluated on the cobas e 801 module (Roche Diagnostics) for routine first-time blood donor screening.Materials & MethodsFive Elecsys infectious disease assays were tested on the cobas e 801 module at Etablissement Français du Sang, Montpellier, France (March–April 2018). The performance of Elecsys HIV Duo, Anti-HCV II, HBsAg II, Anti-HBc II, and Syphilis assays was compared with PRISM HIV O Plus, HCV, HBsAg, HBcore, and newbio pk TPHA assays (specificity analyses)/ARCHITECT Syphilis TP (sensitivity analyses), respectively. Specificity was determined in residual fresh serum samples from unselected first-time blood donors (n ≥ 5195 per parameter). Elecsys assay sensitivity was tested using 30 preselected, positively characterized samples per assay and compared with archived routine testing data for comparator assays.ResultsAcross all parameters, specificities for repeatedly reactive samples ranged from 99.81–100.00% for Elecsys assays and 99.71–99.98% for comparator assays. Sensitivities of Elecsys and comparator assays were the same for hepatitis C (85.19%), hepatitis B surface antigen (70.00%), hepatitis B core antigen antibodies (100.00%), and syphilis (100.00%). The sensitivity of the Elecsys HIV Duo assay was higher than the comparator assay (83.33% vs. 76.67%), but the difference was not statistically significant.ConclusionsElecsys infectious disease assays on the cobas e 801 module demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity for screening first-time blood donor samples, and were comparable with other commercially available assays. The Elecsys assays are reliable tests for screening blood donations.     

Detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus: false-negative results in an automated chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (ARCHITECT Anti-HCV) compared to a microparticle enzyme immunoassay (AxSYM HCV Version 3.0).

BACKGROUND: Following an accidental observation of reduced sensitivity for detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) with a novel commercially available automated chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA, ARCHITECT Anti-HCV) compared to a well-established microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA, AxSYM HCV Version 3.0), we wanted to explore whether this could be explained by a variation in marginal sensitivity, to be expected between highly sensitive assays of different formats, or represented a reduced sensitivity of the CMIA to certain antibody profiles. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability of the CMIA to detect low concentrations of anti-HCV antibodies as defined by various patterns in the recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) and already detected in the MEIA system. STUDY DESIGN: All patient sera tested for anti-HCV reactivity during a period of 3 years (27,978) were evaluated. A total of 90 sera had a sample/cut-off ratio (S/CO) between 1.0 and 1.5 in the MEIA test and were available for further testing. Of these, 19 had a probable/possible presence of anti-HCV antibodies based on presence of at least two bands of > or = 1+ strength in the RIBA, or because the patient was known to be anti-HCV positive. These 19 sera were tested with the CMIA. In addition, 16 sera with strong reactivity to various antigen combinations in the RIBA were serially diluted until testing negative in both microparticle test systems. RESULTS: Seven of the 19 sera (37%) were negative (S/CO < 1.0) in the CMIA. At least 3 (16%) of these 19 sera were very likely to be true anti-HCV positive sera (from infants with known anti-HCV positive mothers). HCV-RNA was not detected in any of the sera tested. Testing of sera after serial dilution indicates that the CMIA has a lower sensitivity to c22- and c33c-antibodies than the MEIA, possibly also to c100-3-antibodies. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that ARCHITECT Anti-HCV is less sensitive than AxSYM HCV Version 3.0 in detecting antibodies to c22 and c33c in patients who have cleared their HCV-infection and have naturally declining levels of antibodies.     

Evaluation of performance of the RIBA processor system for automated analysis of the strip immunoblot assay for detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus.

The performance of a new automated analyzer for the processing and interpretation of the RIBA Strip Immunoblot Assay (SIA), used in the diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, was evaluated. Laboratory performance of the RIBA SIA was compared with that of two manually processed supplementary anti-HCV tests (RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA and INNO-LIA HCV Antibody III). Specificity of the automated processing of SIA was 100% for 90 selected anti-HCV-negative samples. On the other hand, 119 of 120 (99.2%) previously confirmed anti-HCV-positive samples were also positive when assayed on the automated processor. Results for all specimens except one (51 of 52) were concordant for manual and automated RIBA, while 15 of 68 sera tested with automated RIBA and the INNO-LIA assay showed different patterns of reactivity. Three HCV sensitivity panels and one seroconversion panel were also compared. The results show a high sensitivity for SIA NS3- and NS5-encoded antigens. Moreover, data obtained for the anti-HCV seroconversion panel and for samples with borderline or discordant anti-HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results suggest that bands with a relative intensity of >0.5 on the automated analyzer (theoretically negative) should be evaluated with care. Coefficients of variability ranged from 9 to 14.8% in an interassay reproducibility study. Overall, the performance of the automated analysis of SIA is comparable to that of the manual RIBA assay. The new automated processor for SIA bands proved to be sensitive and specific. Its use makes the optical scoring of bands unnecessary by indicating relative intensity values, which could be particularly useful in the follow-up care of anti-HCV-positive patients receiving antiviral therapy.     

Detection of hepatitis C virus antibody in non-A non-B liver diseases

Hepatitis C virus antibody (anti-HCV) was assessed in serum samples from patients with non-A, non-B liver diseases using an Ortho HCV ELISA kit. In patients with posttransfusion hepatitis, anti-HCV was found in 89% and the interval between onset and anti-HCV seroconversion was 51 to 168 (mean 80) days. Anti-HCV remained positive with fluctuating serum GPT levels in 88% of the patients in whom anti-HCV seroconversion was observed. In chronic liver diseases, anti-HCV was found in 70 to 100%, being more common in patients who had a history of blood transfusion. The average interval between transfusion and detectable anti-HCV was 21.5 years. Anti-HCV was also found occasionally in patients having normalized serum GPT level after the onset, HBV carrier with posttransfusion hepatitis and patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Decreasing anti-HCV titer was noted with the normalization of serum GPT levels in the patients who received interferon therapy. These findings suggest that anti-HCV is closely associated with blood transfusion and HCV infection plays an important role in non-A, non-B liver diseases. The improvement of the current HCV assay system seems to contribute to further evaluation of the clinical entity of HCV infection.     

Performance of ARCHITECT HCV core antigen test with specimens from US plasma donors and injecting drug users

BackgroundHepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen is a serological marker of current HCV infection.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was mainly to evaluate the performance characteristics of the ARCITECT HCV core antigen assay with specimens from US plasma donors and injecting drug users.Study designA total of 551 serum and plasma samples with known anti-HCV and HCV RNA status were tested for HCV core antigen using the Abbott ARCHITECT HCV core antigen test.ResultsHCV core antigen was detectable in 100% of US plasma donor samples collected during the pre-seroconversion phase of infection (anti-HCV negative/HCV RNA positive). Overall sensitivity of the HCV core antigen assay was 88.9–94.3% in samples collected after seroconversion. The correlation between HCV core antigen and HCV RNA titers was 0.959.ConclusionsHCV core antigen testing may be reliably used to identify current HCV infection.     

Performance comparison of the 4th generation Bio-Rad Laboratories GS HIV Combo Ag/Ab EIA on the EVOLIS™ automated system versus Abbott ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo,Ortho Anti-HIV 1 + 2 EIA on Vitros ECi and Siemens HIV-1/O/2 enhanced on Advia Centaur

BackgroundA multisite study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the Bio-Rad 4th generation GS HIV Combo Ag/Ab EIA versus Abbott 4th generation ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo. The performance of two 3rd generation EIAs, Ortho Diagnostics Anti-HIV 1 + 2 EIA and Siemens HIV 1/O/2 was also evaluated.ObjectiveStudy objective was comparison of analytical HIV-1 p24 antigen detection, sensitivity in HIV-1 seroconversion panels, specificity in blood donors and two HIV false reactive panels.Study designAnalytical sensitivity was evaluated with International HIV-1 p24 antigen standards, the AFFSAPS (pg/mL) and WHO 90/636 (IU/mL) standards; sensitivity in acute infection was compared on 55 seroconversion samples, and specificity was evaluated on 1000 negative blood donors and two false reactive panels.ResultsGS HIV Combo Ag/Ab demonstrated better analytical HIV antigen sensitivity compared to ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo: 0.41 IU/mL versus 1.2 IU/mL (WHO) and 12.7 pg/mL versus 20.1 pg/mL (AFSSAPS); GS HIV Combo Ag/Ab EIA also demonstrated slightly better specificity compared to ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo (100% versus 99.7%). The 4th generation HIV Combo tests detected seroconversion 7–11 days earlier than the 3rd generation HIV antibody only EIAs.ConclusionBoth 4th generation immunoassays demonstrated excellent performance in sensitivity, with the reduction of the serological window period (7–11 days earlier detection than the 3rd generation HIV tests). However, GS HIV Combo Ag/Ab demonstrated improved HIV antigen analytical sensitivity and slightly better specificity when compared to ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo assay, with higher positive predictive values (PPV) for low prevalence populations.     

Clinical performance evaluation of four automated chemiluminescence immunoassays for hepatitis C virus antibody detection

Various automated chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) analyzers for the detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) are now commercially available in clinical laboratories and are replacing conventional enzyme immunoassays. We investigated the performance of four anti-HCV CLIAs (the Architect Anti-HCV assay on the Architect i2000 system, the Vitros Anti-HCV assay on the Vitros ECiQ Immunodiagnostic System, the Access HCV Ab PLUS assay on the UniCel DxI 800 analyzer, and the newly developed Elecsys Anti-HCV assay on the Cobas e 411 analyzer). The total percent coefficient of variation values of imprecision were 3.5 to 5.7% with positive control materials and 7.2 to 10.2% with negative control materials. The agreement between the results of the Elecsys, Architect, Vitros, and Access CLIAs ranged from 94.5 to 98.1%. The clinical sensitivity of all CLIAs was 100%. Each CLIA showed excellent reproducibility and clinical sensitivity. The Elecsys, Architect, Vitros, and Access CLIAs showed clinical specificities of 98.2, 98.8, 96.5, and 98.2%.     

Evaluation of 14 commercial HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody assays using serum panels of different geographical origin and clinical stage including a unique seroconversion panel

The performance of 14 commercially available HIV-1/2 antibody assays were compared using well-characterized serum panels containing in total 1500–1800 sera. The panels included consecutive HIV-negative blood donor sera from Sweden, unselected blood donor and patient sera from Tanzania and unselected sera from outpatient clinics in Guinea-Bissau. Furthermore selected HIV-1 antibody positive sera from Sweden and Tanzania and HIV-2 antibody positive sera from Guinea-Bissau were included in the panels. The HIV-1 antibody positive sera were from individuals at various stages of HIV infection, from primary infection, to asymptomatic phase and late stage disease. 12 of the 14 assays identified correctly all HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibody positive sera. One Tanzanian HIV-1 antibody positive sample with complete banding pattern on Western blot was not detected by two of the ELISAs employing synthetic peptides. There were small differences in sensitivity between the assays when used for analysis of seroconversion panels. The most sensitive assay, Abbott IMx HIV-1/HIV-2 III Plus detected antibodies in all nine samples collected from four individuals during the first week after onset of symptoms of primary HIV-1 infection. Most of the assays became reactive during the second week after onset of symptoms and the least sensitive assays were reactive from the third week. The assays showed a high specificity ranging from 99.2 to 100% when used for analysis of Swedish blood donor sera, while most of the assays showed a significantly lower specificity, 91.9–99.6%, when used for testing African specimens.     

Detection of HIV-1 proviral DNA with the AMPLICOR HIV-1 DNA Test, version 1.5, following sample processing by the MagNA Pure LC instrument.

BACKGROUND: The AMPLICOR HIV-1 DNA Test, version 1.5 (AMP HIV-1 DNA 1.5), is a new commercially available PCR assay for the detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) proviral DNA in human whole blood. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the performance characteristics of the assay following automated sample processing by the MagNA Pure LC instrument (MP). STUDY DESIGN: Analytical sensitivity and reproducibility were assessed by testing replicate HIV-1 DNA dilution panels over 5 days. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were studied among 28 HIV-1 DNA-positive clinical specimens, 60 specimens from healthy blood donors, and 63 specimens from HIV-1-seropositive patients with HIV-1 RNA plasma levels ranging from <50 to >100,000 copies/mL. RESULTS: Following MP sample processing, the assay yielded an analytical sensitivity (95% detection rate) of 66.3 copies/mL (95% CI, 50.7-106.8), with clinical sensitivity and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: MP is a reliable, labor-saving platform capable of processing specimens for AMP HIV-1 DNA 1.5. When combined with MP sample processing, AMP HIV-1 DNA 1.5 is a sensitive and reproducible assay for the detection of HIV-1 DNA in clinical whole blood specimens. However, the current AMP HIV-1 DNA 1.5 kit configuration may result in inefficient utilization of reagents.     

Evaluation of a new, fully automated immunoassay for detection of HTLV-I and HTLV-II antibodies

Screening blood donations for human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II (HTLV-I/II) continues to be important in protecting the safety of blood products and controlling the global spread of these retroviruses. We have developed a fully automated, third generation chemiluminescent immunoassay, ARCHITECT rHTLV-I/II, for detection of antibodies to HTLV-I/II. The assay utilizes recombinant proteins and synthetic peptides and is configured in a double antigen sandwich assay format. Specificity of the assay was 99.98% (9,254/9,256, 95% CI = 99.92-100%) with the negative specimens from the general population including blood donors, hospital patients and pregnant women from the US, Japan and Nicaragua. The assay demonstrated 100% sensitivity by detecting 498 specimens from individuals infected with HTLV-I (n = 385) and HTLV-II (n = 113). ARCHITECT rHTLV-I/II results were in complete agreement with the Murex HTLV-I/II reference assay and 99.7% agreement with the Genelabs HTLV Blot 2.4 confirmatory assay. Analytical sensitivity of the assay was equivalent to Murex HTLV-I/II assay based on end point dilutions. Furthermore, using a panel of 397 specimens from Japan, the ARCHITECT rHTLV-I/II assay exhibited distinct discrimination between the antibody negative (Delta Value = -7.6) and positive (Delta Value = 7.6) populations. Based on the excellent specificity and sensitivity, the new ARCHITECT rHTLV-I/II assay should be an effective test for the diagnosis of HTLV-I/II infection and also for blood donor screening.     

Comparative evaluation of three FDA-approved HIV Ag/Ab combination tests using a genetically diverse HIV panel and diagnostic specimens

BackgroundHIV Ag/Ab combination assays are recommended by CDC for routine screening and several HIV Ag/Ab combination tests are now FDA-approved. Maintaining high specificity and consistent sensitivity across diverse HIV strains is critical for these assays to accurately detect HIV infection and expedite delivery of patient results.ObjectivesTo evaluate performance of three FDA-approved HIV tests: ARCHITECT HIV Combo (Abbott), ADVIA Centaur HIV Combo (Siemens) and BioPlex HIV Ag-Ab (Bio-Rad).Study designSensitivity and specificity were evaluated using an extensive panel of 28 HIV infected human specimens and 17 cultured virus isolates representing multiple genotypes, 6 seroconversion panels, 4 human samples with acute infection, WHO p24 standard and 4020 clinical specimens.ResultsThe p24 limit of detection (LOD) for the WHO standard was 0.19 IU/ml, 0.70 IU/ml, and 1.77 IU/ml in BioPlex, ARCHITECT, and Centaur respectively. The distribution of LODs across 15 HIV-1 isolates was substantially narrower in ARCHITECT (5–33 pg/ml) than in BioPlex (11–198 pg/ml) and Centaur (6–384 pg/ml). All assays detected antibodies to the majority of HIV-1 and HIV-2 variants. However, reduced sensitivity was observed for Centaur in detection of antibodies to HIV-1 group M (CRF02_AG), O and N variants. BioPlex and ARCHITECT showed better seroconversion sensitivity than Centaur, detecting one bleed (3–7 days) earlier in 4 (BioPlex) and 3 (ARCHITECT) of 6 seroconversion panels. ARCHITECT demonstrated the highest specificity (99.90–100%) compared to BioPlex (99.80%) and Centaur (99.42%).ConclusionsThe overall performance of ARCHITECT and BioPlex was superior to Centaur, especially for detection of acute HIV infection.     

A novel semi-automated paramagnetic microparticle based enzyme immunoassay for hepatitis C virus: its application to serologic testing.

A new rapid serologic enzyme immunoassay for antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) is described. The assay combines synthetic peptide and recombinant antigens representing putative structural and non structural HCV gene products with paramagnetic microparticle assay (MP assay) technology. Assay readout is based upon an enzymatically generated fluorescent product which is quantified with a novel semi-automated washer/reader instrument system. Assay sensitivity and specificity was determined to be greater than the first generation HCV C-100 EIA using a non-A, non-B hepatitis disease panel, an HCV performance panel, an HCV seroconversion panel, dilutions of HCV reactive sera, and random volunteer blood donor specimens.     

Performance evaluation of the ADVIA Centaur((R)) anti-HBe and HBeAg assays

BACKGROUND: Detection of HBeAg and anti-HBe is valuable for the evaluation and therapeutic management of hepatitis B infection. OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical performance of the newly CE-approved(a) HBeAg and anti-HBe assays on the fully automated, random access ADVIA Centaur((R)) immunoassay system. STUDY DESIGN: Patient samples collected at two sites were used to compare the ADVIA Centaur assays to Abbott AxSYMtrade mark assays. Consensus of discordant results was reached using Roche Elecsys((R)) assays. Additionally, two well-characterized seroconversion panels were evaluated. RESULTS: The ADVIA Centaur HBeAg assay sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 99.5%. The ADVIA Centaur anti-HBe assay sensitivity was 100% and the resolved specificity was 98.2%. Fewer samples required retesting with the ADVIA Centaur assays than with the AxSYM. In two well-characterized seroconversion panels, the ADVIA Centaur anti-HBe assay detected anti-HBe 20-25 days earlier than the AxSYM assay; the ADVIA Centaur and AxSYM HBeAg assays detected HBe reactivity on the same day. CONCLUSIONS: The ADVIA Centaur HBeAg and anti-HBe assays demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity, and thus are suitable for clinical use. Their novel algorithms require reduced retesting, suggesting these assays may be more cost effective.     

Improved Detection of Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen by a New Rapid Automated Assay

The performance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) screening assays is continuously improved in order to reduce the residual risk of transfusion-associated hepatitis B. In a multicenter study, a new automated rapid screening assay, Elecsys HBsAg (Roche Diagnostics), was compared to well-established tests (Auszyme Monoclonal [overnight incubation] version B and IMx HBsAg [Abbott]). Included in the evaluation were 23 seroconversion panels; sera from the acute and chronic phases of infection; dilution series of various HBsAg standards, HBV subtypes, and S gene mutants; and isolated anti-HBV core antigen-positive samples. To challenge the specificity of the new assay, sera from HBsAg-negative blood donors, pregnant women, and dialysis and hospitalized patients and potentially cross-reactive samples were investigated. Elecsys HBsAg showed a higher sensitivity for HBsAg subtypes ad, ay, adw2, adw4, ayw1, ayw2, ayw4, and adr detection in dilution series of different standards or sera than Auszyme Monoclonal version B and/or IMx HBsAg. Acute hepatitis B was detected in 11 to 16 of 23 seroconversion panels between 2 and 16 days earlier with Elecsys HBsAg than with the alternative assays. Elecsys HBsAg and Auszyme Monoclonal version B detected HBsAg surface mutants with equal sensitivity. The sensitivity and specificity of Elecsys HBsAg were 100%. Auszyme Monoclonal version B had a 99.9% specificity, and its sensitivity was 96.6%. IMx HBsAg showed a poorer sensitivity and specificity than the other assays. In conclusion, Elecsys HBsAg permits earlier detection of acute hepatitis B and different HBV subtypes than the alternative assays. By using highly sensitive HBsAg screening assays, low-level HBsAg carriers among isolated anti-HBV core antigen-positive individuals can be detected.