Cyclical etidronate increases bone density in the spine and hip of postmenopausal women receiving long term corticosteroid treatment. A double blind, randomised placebo controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of cyclic etidronate in secondary prevention of corticosteroid induced osteoporosis. METHODS: A double blind, randomised placebo controlled study comparing cyclic etidronate and placebo during two years in 37 postmenopausal women receiving long term corticosteroid treatment, mainly for polymyalgia rheumatica (40% of the patients) and rheumatoid arthritis (30%). Bone density was measured in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and femoral trochanter. RESULTS: After two years of treatment there was a significant difference between the groups in mean per cent change from baseline in bone density in the spine in favour of etidronate (p = 0.003). The estimated treatment difference (mean (SD)) was 9.3 (2.1)%. Etidronate increased bone density in the spine (4.9 (2.1)%, p < 0.05) whereas the placebo group lost bone (-2.4 (1.6)%). At the femoral neck there was an estimated difference of 5.3 (2.6)% between the groups (etidronate: 3.6% (1.4)%, p < 0.05, placebo: -2.4 (2.1)%). The estimated difference at the trochanter was 8.2 (3.0) (etidronate: 9.0 (1.5)%, p < 0.0001, placebo: 0.5 (2.3)%). No significant bone loss occurred in the hip in placebo treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclic etidronate is an effective treatment for postmenopausal women receiving corticosteroid treatment and is well tolerated.     

A pooled data analysis on the use of intermittent cyclical etidronate therapy for the prevention and treatment of corticosteroid induced bone loss

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pooled data analysis in a group of patients defined by sex, menopausal status, and underlying disease in order to examine the effect of intermittent cyclical etidronate in the prevention and treatment of corticosteroid induced osteoporosis. METHODS: We selected 5 randomized, placebo controlled studies that examined the efficacy of intermittent cyclical etidronate therapy in which the raw data were available for analysis. Three were prevention studies and 2 treatment studies. The primary outcome was the difference between treatment groups in the percentage change from baseline in lumbar spine bone density. Secondary outcomes included the difference between treatment groups in the percentage change from baseline in femoral neck and trochanter bone density, and vertebral fracture rates. RESULTS: Results are separately pooled for the prevention and treatment studies. The prevention studies had significant mean differences (95% CI) between groups in mean percentage change from baseline in lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter bone density of 3.7 (2.6 to 4.7), 1.7 (0.4 to 2.9), and 2.8% (1.3 to 4.2) after one year of treatment, in favor of the etidronate group. The treatment studies displayed a mean difference between groups in mean percentage change from baseline in lumbar spine bone density of 4.8 (2.7 to 6.9) and 5.4% (2.5 to 8.4) after one and 2 years of therapy. In the prevention studies, a reduced fracture incidence was observed in the etidronate group compared with the placebo group (relative risk 0.50; CI 0.21 to 1.19). CONCLUSION: Etidronate therapy was effective in preventing bone loss in the prevention studies and in preventing or slightly increasing bone mass in the treatment studies. A fracture benefit was observed in postmenopausal women treated with etidronate in the prevention studies.     

Fracture thresholds in osteoporosis: implications for hormone replacement treatment.

The bone mineral densities of the lumbar spine and femoral neck were determined by dual energy chi ray absorptiometry in 110 women aged 40-82 years (average 65 years) with spinal osteoporosis who had had at least one atraumatic vertebral compression fracture and in 1026 normal women aged 40-79 years (average 52 years). The women with osteoporosis showed a significant decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck compared with age matched normal women (sixth decade of life -26% spine, -23% femoral neck; seventh decade -26% spine, -16% femoral neck). The fracture threshold, defined as the 90th centile of spinal BMD for women with osteoporosis, was 0.81 g/cm2 at the lumbar spine and 0.656 g/cm2 at the femoral neck. Five per cent of normal women aged 40-49 years, 20% aged 50-59 years, and 45% aged 60-69 years had a BMD below this threshold. To maintain the bones of women above the fracture threshold until the age of 70 years about 50% of postmenopausal women need hormone replacement therapy. However, if the BMD is to be kept above the fracture threshold for a women's lifetime, e.g. until the age of 80-90 years, then most women will need treatment, though for various lengths of time depending on their initial BMD. Measurements of BMD in postmenopausal women currently help in identifying the risk of osteoporotic fractures but in the lifetime assessment of risk in a single subject they may have a more important role in deciding the duration of hormone replacement therapy.     

Comparison of changes in bone mineral in idiopathic and secondary osteoporosis following therapy with cyclical disodium etidronate and high dose calcium supplementation

OBJECTIVE Our clinical practice has been to offer treatment with cyclical disodlum etidronate and high dose calcium supplements (1500–1600 mg/day) to ail female patients with osteoporosis who are unable or unwilling to take hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and male osteoporotics. In a retrospective study we compared the effect of this treatment on measures of bone mineral over a 12-month period in women wlth post-menopausal and secondary osteoporosis. We also assessed its effects in 10 male osteoporotics. DESIGN A retrospective analysis of 83 consecutive patients with osteoporosis who completed 12 months of treatment with disodlum etldronate and calcium and who had a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan at baseline and foilowing 12 months of therapy. PATIENTS The study Included 73 women (45 post-meno-pausal and 28 secondary osteoporotics) and 10 men with established osteoporosis as shown by spinal and femoral bone mineral densities (BMD) > 2 standard deviations (SD) below young normals, and radioiogical evidence of osteoporosis. MEASUREMENTS Each patient had routine biochemistry at baseline, an X-ray of thoracic and lumbar spine and a DEXA scan of lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck. The DEXA scan was repeated following 12 months of therapy. RESULTS There was no difference between increase in spinal BMD in the post-menopausal (5·7%) versus secondary osteoporotic group (6·7%). There was a significant increase in spinal BMD at 12 months in the 10 male osteoporotics (9·0%, P < 0·01). No overall change in femoral neck BMD was noted. CONCLUSIONS Cyclical disodium etidronate given with hlgh dose calcium supplements is equally effective in increasing spinal bone mineral density in post-menopausal and secondary osteoporosis. It also results in a significant rise In spinal bone mineral density in male osteoporotics. Whether this produces a reduction in fracture rates is unknown.     

Transdermal oestrogen therapy protects postmenopausal liver transplant women from osteoporosis. A 2-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) prevents osteoporosis in postmenopausal women by inhibiting bone resorption, but the benefits of oestrogen therapy in liver transplant patients have not been studied. METHODS: The effect of transdermal HRT was studied in 33 postmenopausal liver transplant women. The main outcome measure was the change in bone mineral density (BMD) which was measured annually for 2 years. The effect on bone turnover was studied by assessment of the serum aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP). RESULTS: The mean lumbar BMD increased from 0.816 at baseline to 0.858 and to 0.878 g/cm2 (P < 0.001) after 1 and 2 years of therapy, respectively. The BMD of the femoral neck increased from 0.665 to 0.690 g/cm2 (P < 0.006). During the first and second years, the mean BMD of the lumbar spine increased by 5.3 and 1.2%, while that of the femoral neck increased by 3.3 and 1.2%. After 2 years of HRT, only one-fifth of the patients had osteoporosis, whereas over half of the women had osteoporosis at baseline. The median serum PINP decreased by 47% at 1 year and remained decreased at 2 years compared with baseline levels. CONCLUSION: Transdermal HRT decreased the turnover rate of mineralized bone matrix. Transplant women responded with increased BMD, just like healthy postmenopausal women.     

Comparative efficacy of hormone replacement therapy, etidronate, calcitonin, alfacalcidol, and vitamin K in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: The Yamaguchi Osteoporosis Prevention Study

PURPOSE: To assess the comparative effectiveness of several medications on bone mineral density, biochemical bone markers, and the incidence of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS: A total of 396 postmenopausal women, aged 50 to 75 years, were allocated randomly to six equal-sized groups: hormone replacement therapy, etidronate, eel calcitonin, alfacalcidol, vitamin K (menatetrenone), or control (no treatment). Thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs, bone mineral density at the distal radius, and markers of bone turnover were assessed at baseline and every 3 months during the 2-year study. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, the 2-year mean changes in bone mineral density were 2.0% for hormone replacement therapy, -0.5% for etidronate, 1.6% for calcitonin, -3.6% for alfacalcidol, -1.9% for vitamin K, and -3.3% for control. Seventeen (26%) of the 66 control patients developed new vertebral fractures. Compared with controls, the relative risks of vertebral fracture were 0.35 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14 to 0.83) for hormone replacement therapy, 0.40 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.92) for etidronate, 0.41 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.93) for calcitonin, 0.56 (95% CI: 0.26 to 1.12) for alfacalcidol, and 0.44 (95% CI: 0.20 to 0.99) for vitamin K. CONCLUSION: We observed significant reductions in the incidence of vertebral fractures with hormone replacement therapy, etidronate, and calcitonin, and significant improvements in bone mineral density with hormone replacement therapy and calcitonin.     

Prevention of bone loss with tibolone in postmenopausal women: results of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding studies

Tibolone, a novel compound with tissue-specific effects, has been found to have antiresorptive properties in bone. To confirm the efficacy of tibolone and determine its minimum effective dose for prevention of bone loss in early postmenopausal women, two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding studies were performed. Seven hundred seventy healthy women postmenopausal within 1-4 yr, with normal bone density for their age, were treated for 2 yr with 0.3, 0.625, 1.25, or 2.5 mg tibolone daily or placebo. All subjects took supplemental calcium carbonate (500 mg daily). Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and right proximal femur was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for up to 2 yr. At each dose level, except the lowest (0.3 mg), tibolone produced a progressive increase in lumbar spine and total hip BMD over the 2-yr treatment period; at 0.3 mg, total hip density was maintained. However, only the doses 1.25 mg and 2.5 mg produced a progressive increase in femoral neck BMD. The differences in mean percent change from baseline in spine and total hip density were significant (P < 0.05) for all tibolone dose groups compared with placebo at all time points. Tibolone was well tolerated, with a similar overall incidence of adverse events compared with placebo. Tibolone 1.25 mg per day is recommended because it shows a positive and statistically significant change in BMD of spine and femoral neck.     

Osteoporosis in mixed connective tissue disease

The existence of osteoporosis in 58 postmenopausal women with mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) was investigated. The mean bone mineral density assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in the lumbar spine was decreased in 25.8% of the patients, reflecting osteoporosis (T score < –2.5). In the femoral neck there was no significant difference between the BMD of MCTD patients and that of age-matched, healthy postmenopausal women. Low bone mineral density was found among patients on, as well as off, corticosteroids. The extent of bone loss was associated with disease duration, as well as corticosteroid therapy. Serum osteocalcin levels were lower in MCTD patients than in controls. Lower serum oestradiol, testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate levels were detected in MCTD patients than in controls. Thus, MCTD may be associated with increased bone loss. Pathogenic factors may include the disease itself, corticosteroid therapy, impaired osteoblast function, and low serum sex hormone levels.     

Etidronate for osteoporosis in primary biliary cirrhosis: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND/AIM: Osteoporosis is a common complication of primary biliary cirrhosis but there is no accepted therapy for the osteoporosis. In this randomized controlled trial, we compared the effects of etidronate to placebo on the treatment of osteoporosis associated with primary biliary cirrhosis. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and osteopenia, defined by bone mineral density criteria (T-score < -2.0) were enrolled. Measurements of the lumbar spine and proximal femur, as well as x-rays of the lumbar spine, were obtained. Patients received cyclical etidronate 400 mg/day for 14 days every 3 months for at least 1 year. Supplemental calcium was administered on the days patients did not receive etidronate. RESULTS: Of the 67 patients entered, 60 completed at least 1 year of therapy. There was no significant difference in changes in bone density at either the lumbar spine or femur in patients receiving etidronate when compared to placebo. Fractures occurred in eight patients, four receiving etidronate. Etidronate therapy was associated with a significant reduction in markers of bone turnover compared to placebo. These changes did not correlate with changes in bone density. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclical etidronate administered with supplemental calcium did not significantly improve bone density in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.     

36 month intermittent cyclical etidronate treatment in patients with established corticosteroid induced osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the longterm safety and efficacy of etidronate therapy in patients in whom corticosteroid induced bone loss has already occurred. METHODS: We performed a 36 month observational cohort study in which all data were obtained from Canadian Database of Osteoporosis and Osteopenia (CANDOO) patients. The etidronate group consisted of 24 patients who received 400 mg of etidronate disodium for 14 days, followed by 76 days of calcium carbonate (500 mg of elemental calcium), repeated every 3 mo; the control group included 37 patients who received calcium carbonate 500 to 1000 mg daily. Outcome measurements included changes within groups from baseline and differences between groups in the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter at 12, 24, and 36 months. The incidence of vertebral fractures was also determined. RESULTS: Etidronate therapy resulted in a meaningful percentage increase from baseline in lumbar spine BMD, primarily during the first 24 months of treatment, and this increase was sustained for the remainder of the 36 month study period (5.2%; p = 0.016). Analysis of covariance revealed a significant percentage difference (SD) between groups in lumbar spine BMD at 12 [5.5 (13.5) percent; p = 0.003] and 24 months [6.0 (17.4) percent; p = 0.011] in favor of the etidronate group. After 3 years of therapy, one patient (4%) experienced one vertebral fracture in the etidronate group, whereas 3 patients (8%) experienced 5 vertebral fractures in the control group. CONCLUSION: Etidronate treatment administered for 36 months reversed lumbar spine bone loss, and appeared to be safe in patients with established corticosteroid induced osteoporosis.     

Risedronate reverses bone loss in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: results from a multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMD-MN Study Group

Our objective was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of risedronate in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. Women with a mean lumbar spine T-score of -2 or less (n = 543) received 24 months of placebo or risedronate (2.5 or 5 mg/day). All received calcium (1 g/day). The principal outcome measures were bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and femoral trochanter. At 24 months, lumbar spine BMD increased from baseline by 4% with 5 mg risedronate and 1.4% in the 2.5-mg group, compared with no change with placebo. Efficacy was similar in women who were less than 5 yr and more than 5 yr postmenopausal. At 24 months, risedronate (5 mg) had also increased BMD at the femoral neck and trochanter, whereas BMD decreased in the placebo group. BMD increases were seen at all three sites with risedronate (5 mg) after only 6 months of therapy. Risedronate was well tolerated; upper gastrointestinal adverse events were similar to placebo. We conclude that risedronate (5 mg) increases BMD rapidly and effectively and is well tolerated in postmenopausal women with low bone mass, regardless of time since menopause.     

Combination of intermittent cyclical etidronate and hormone replacement therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis

Treatment with etidronate alone is unlikely to increase the bone mineral density of the femoral neck. In combination of etidronate and hormone replacement therapy has been shown to markedly increase the bone mineral density of the femur and may decrease the risk of fracture. These findings suggest that etidronate and hormone replacement therapy inhibit bone resorption by different mechanisms of action. Treatment with a combination of etidronate and hormone replacement therapy may therefore be an important option for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.     

Usefulness of bone densitometry in postmenopausal women with clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures

OBJECTIVE: To analyse whether bone mineral density (BMD) assessment is required in postmenopausal women presenting with low trauma vertebral fracture. METHODS: Women with vertebral fracture diagnosed over a 10 year period were recruited from our database. The following were excluded: (a) patients with high energy trauma; (b) patients with malignancies; (c) patients with a metabolic bone disease other than osteoporosis. All postmenopausal women were included in whom BMD had been evaluated at both the lumbar spine and femoral neck by dual energy x ray absorptiometry during the six months after the diagnosis. Patients with a potential cause of osteoporosis other than age and menopause were not considered. A total of 215 patients were identified. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the patients was 65.9 (6.9) years. BMD at the lumbar spine was 0.725 (0.128) g/cm(2) and the T score was -2.94 (1.22); BMD at the femoral neck was 0.598 (0.095) g/cm(2) and the T score was -2.22 (0.89). The BMD of the patients was significantly lower than that of the general population at both the lumbar spine and femoral neck. When the lowest value of the two analysed zones was considered, six patients (3%) showed a normal BMD, 51 (23.5%) osteopenia, and 158 (73.5%) osteoporosis. The prevalence of osteoporosis at the femoral neck increased with age; it was 25% in patients under 60, 35% in patients aged 60-70, and 60% in patients over 70. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that bone densitometry is not required in postmenopausal women with clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures if it is performed only to confirm the existence of a low BMD.     

Bone mineral density and frequency of osteoporosis among Vietnamese women with early rheumatoid arthritis

Generalised bone mineral density (BMD) reduction often occurs in established rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, in early RA, there is a disagreement with regard to BMD in the femoral neck and lumbar spine, and there is no available information for the whole body. Therefore, the aims of this study were to investigate the BMD, frequency of osteoporosis and the risk factors for BMD reduction in Vietnamese women with early RA. BMD in the femoral neck, lumbar spine L1–4 and whole body was measured in 105 women with early RA (disease duration ≤3 years) and 105 age-matched healthy women (26–73 years) using a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Femoral neck and whole body BMD in women with RA were lower (p < 0.05) than controls, while lumbar spine BMD was similar between two groups. The frequency of osteoporosis in the femoral neck, lumbar spine and whole body in women with RA aged ≥50 were higher (p < 0.05) than controls: 41.8% versus 29.5%, 42.2% versus 37.7% and 37.1% versus 28%, respectively. There were associations between the frequencies of osteoporosis at all sites with postmenopausal status, glucocorticoid use, rheumatoid factor positivity and disease activity with lumbar spine BMD and disease disability with femoral neck and whole body BMD. In conclusion, women with early RA had significantly lower femoral neck and whole body BMD, but had similar lumbar spine BMD compared with controls. The frequency of osteoporosis at all sites was significantly higher in women with RA than controls, suggesting that assessment of BMD should be considered in women with early RA.     

Development and validation of the osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) tool to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density

Osteoporosis and its consequent increase in fracture risk is a major health concern for postmenopausal women and older men and has the potential to reach epidemic proportions. The "gold standard" for osteoporosis diagnosis is bone densitometry. However, economic issues or availability of the technology may prevent the possibility of mass screening. The goal of this study was to develop and validate a clinical scoring index designed as a prescreening tool to help clinicians identify which women are at increased risk of osteoporosis [bone mineral density (BMD) T-score -2.5 or less] and should therefore undergo further testing with bone densitometry. Records were analyzed for 1522 postmenopausal females over 50 years of age who had undergone testing with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporosis risk index scores were compared to bone density T-scores. Hologic QDR 4500 technology was used to measure BMD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine (L1-L4). Participants who had a previous diagnosis of osteoporosis or were taking bone-active medication were excluded. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to identify the specific cutpoint value that would identify women at increased risk of low BMD. A simple algorithm based on age, weight, history of previous low impact fracture, early menopause, and corticosteroid therapy was developed. Validation of this five-item osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) index showed that the tool, at the recommended threshold (or cutoff value) of two, had a sensitivity that ranged from 88.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) for the mean: 86.2-91.9%] at the femoral neck to 90% (95% CI for the mean: 86.1-93.1%) at the lumbar spine area. Corresponding specificity values were 60.6 (95% CI for the mean: 57.9-63.3%) and 64.2% (95% CI for the mean: 61.4-66.9%), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) ranged from 29 at the femoral neck to 39.2% at the lumbar spine, while the corresponding negative predictive values (NPVs) reached 96.5 and 96.2%, respectively. Based on this cutoff value, the area under the ROC curve was 0.866 (95% CI for the mean: 0.847-0.882) for the lumbar spine and 0.814 (95% CI for the mean: 0.793-0.833) for the femoral neck. We conclude that the OPERA is a free and effective method for identifying Italian postmenopausal women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Its use could facilitate the appropriate and more cost-effective use of bone densitometry in developing countries.     

Osteoporosis in treated adult coeliac disease.

Forty five women and 10 men with coeliac disease diagnosed in adult life, who were already on a gluten free diet, had serial bone mineral density measurements at the lumbar spine and femoral neck over 12 months. Osteoporosis, defined as a bone mineral density (BMD) < or = 2 SD below the normal peak bone mass was found in 50% of male and 47% of female coeliac patients. Patients with a BMD < or = 2 SD below age and sex matched normal subjects, had a significantly lower body mass index (21.3 kg.m-2 compared with 25.2 kg.m-2, p < 0.02 Wilcoxon rank sum test) and lower average daily calcium intake (860 mg/day compared with 1054 mg/day, p < 0.05 Wilcoxon rank sum test) than patients with normal bone mineral density. In postmenopausal women with coeliac disease there was a strong correlation between the age at menopause and BMD at both the lumbar spine (r = 0.681, p < 0.01, Spearman's rank correlation) and femoral neck (r = 0.632, p < 0.01). No overall loss of bone was shown over the 12 months of follow up, and relative to the reference population there was a significant improvement in BMD at the lumbar spine in women (p < 0.025, paired t test) and at the femoral neck in men (p < 0.05, paired t test). There was a significant negative correlation between the annual percentage change in BMD at the lumbar spine and the duration of gluten free diet (r = -0.429, p<0.01, Spearman's rank correlation), with the largest gain in BMD in patients with most recently diagnosed coeliac disease. Osteoporosis was shown in 47% of patients with treated adult coeliac disease. Recognised risk factors for osteoporosis in the general population including low body mass index, dietary calcium intake, and early menopause are particularly important in coeliac disease. Treatment of coeliac disease with a gluten free diet probably protects against further bone loss, and in the early stages is associated with a gain in bone mineral density.     

Coeliac disease and bone mineral density in adult female patients.

A cross sectional study was undertaken to examine the relationship between coeliac disease and bone mineral density. The 135 female coeliac patients registered on the database of the Department of Gastroenterology at Hull Royal Infirmary were approached by letter, advising them of a potential risk of osteoporosis and inviting them to undergo bone densitometry. A total of 81 registered women (60%) attended the Osteoporosis Laboratory, Princess Royal Hospital and underwent dual energy x ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck. Historical data relating to the time of diagnosis and adherence to a gluten free diet were obtained. A control group was selected from the local normal population and was first matched for height, weight, and menopausal status. Postmenopausal patients were then further matched to controls of equivalent menopausal age. In coeliac patients, bone mineral density expressed in g/cm2 as mean (SD) was significantly lower at the lumbar spine (1.076 (0.186)) than in the control group (1.155 (0.143), p < 0.001). This was also the case at the femoral neck (0.887 (0.142) versus 0.965 (0.127), p < 0.001). When the coeliac patients were stratified by menopausal status, it was found that femoral neck bone mineral density was significantly below control values in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Spinal bone mineral density exhibited a significant decrement only in the postmenopausal group. The age at diagnosis of coeliac disease and adherence to a gluten free diet did not influence bone mineral density at either hip or spine. These results confirm coeliac patients' higher risk of osteopenia. Coeliac disease should be added to the list of medical conditions which constitute an indication for bone densitometry in order that the individual risk of osteoporosis related fracture may be determined.     

Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. III. Meta-analysis of risedronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE: To review the effect of risedronate on bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE from 1966 to the end of 2000 and examined citations of relevant articles and the proceedings of international osteoporosis meetings. STUDY SELECTION: We included eight randomized, placebo-controlled trials of postmenopausal women receiving risedronate or placebo with a follow-up of at least one year and providing data on bone density or fracture rate. DATA EXTRACTION: For each trial, two independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality and abstracted data. DATA SYNTHESIS: The major methodological limitation of the trials was the loss to follow-up, which was over 20% in most trials and over 35% in the largest study. However, the magnitude of the treatment effect was unrelated to loss to follow-up, and in one of the largest trials, more high-risk patients were lost to follow-up in the control than in the treatment group. The pooled relative risk (RR) for vertebral fractures in women given 2.5 mg or more of risedronate was 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54, 0.77]. The pooled RR of nonvertebral fractures in patients given 2.5 mg or more of risedronate was 0.73 (95% CI 0.61, 0.87). Risedronate produced positive effects on the percentage change in bone density of the lumbar spine, combined forearm, and femoral neck that were generally larger with the 5-mg daily dose than with cyclical administration or the 2.5-mg dose. The pooled estimate of the difference in percentage change between 5 mg risedronate and placebo after the final year of treatment (1.5-3 yr) was 4.54% (95% CI 4.12, 4.97) for the lumbar spine, and 2.75% (95% CI 2.32, 3.17) at the femoral neck. CONCLUSIONS: Risedronate substantially reduces the risk of both vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. This fracture reduction is accompanied by an increase in bone density of the lumbar spine and femoral neck in both early postmenopausal women and those with established osteoporosis.     

Risedronate: a clinical review

BACKGROUND: Risedronate sodium has recently been approved for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal and corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. METHODS: Studies of risedronate were obtained from the MEDLINE database (1966 to the present) of references using risedronate, risedronic acid, osteoporosis, and human subject as keywords. Additional references were sought from the reference lists of the articles obtained. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials and 7 other clinical trials were obtained. In postmenopausal women with normal bone density, risedronate increases lumbar spine bone density and preserves femoral neck density. In postmenopausal women with prior vertebral fracture, risedronate decreases new vertebral and nonvertebral fracture incidence. In patients who experienced breast cancer and who have chemotherapy-induced menopause, risedronate preserves bone. Risedronate prevents vertebral bone loss in patients beginning long-term corticosteroid therapy. Risedronate decreases pagetic bone pain and induces radiological improvement in pagetic lesions. Risedronate induces normalization of biochemical abnormalities and may be more effective than etidronate disodium for Paget disease. Only one study, a trial in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis using a low dose (2.5 mg) of risedronate, did not have a positive result. Adverse effects in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, breast cancer, and Paget disease and in those taking corticosteroids are similar to those of patients taking placebo, and do not include notable upper gastrointestinal tract adverse event rates or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Risedronate prevents postmenopausal bone loss, decreases fracture in those with established postmenopausal osteoporosis, effectively treats Paget disease, and prevents corticosteroid-induced bone loss. Long-term toxic effects and efficacy, particularly fracture end point data, are unknown. Also undefined are optimal duration of therapy, potential for use in combination with other agents, and direct comparison with other bisphosphonates used for osteoporosis.     

Association between baseline values of bone turnover markers and bone mineral density and their response to raloxifene treatment in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

It has been well established that raloxifene improves bone turnover, increases bone mineral density (BMD), and reduces the risk of fractures. However, it remains obscure which patients are more likely to respond to treatment with raloxifene in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between baseline values of BMD and bone turnover markers (BTMs) and changes of those values after 1-year treatment with raloxifene. Sixty-eight Japanese postmenopausal women with untreated osteoporosis were selected for this study, among whom 58 patients (mean age 70.40 +/- 9.2 years) completed this study. Lower baseline values of BMD at the lumbar spine, the femoral neck, and the distal radius were significantly correlated with greater increases of BMD at those corresponding sites after 1-year treatment with raloxifene. On the other hand, higher baseline values of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and serum N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) were significantly correlated with greater reductions of BAP and NTx, respectively, after 1-year treatment with raloxifene. Although longer and larger studies with fracture endpoints are needed, our findings suggest that baseline values of BMD and BTMs can be used to predict subsequent skeletal response to raloxifene therapy in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.