Long-term outcomes after ascending aortic replacement and aortic root replacement for type A aortic dissection

 Open in a separate windowOBJECTIVESWe investigated whether the selective use of supracoronary ascending aorta replacement achieves late outcomes comparable to those of aortic root replacement for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD).METHODSPatients who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection from 2005 to 2018 at the Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, were included in this analysis. Late mortality was evaluated with the Kaplan–Meier method and proximal aortic reoperation, i.e. operation on the aortic root or aortic valve, with the competing risk method.RESULTSOut of 309 patients, 216 underwent supracoronary ascending aortic replacement and 93 had aortic root replacement. At 10 years, mortality was 33.8% after aortic root replacement and 35.2% after ascending aortic replacement (P = 0.806, adjusted hazard ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval, 0.77–2.02), and the cumulative incidence of proximal aortic reoperation was 6.0% in the aortic root replacement group and 6.2% in the ascending aortic replacement group (P = 0.65; adjusted subdistributional hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.15–1.89). Among 71 propensity score matched pairs, 10-year survival was 34.4% after aortic root replacement and 36.2% after ascending aortic replacement surgery (P = 0.70). Cumulative incidence of proximal aortic reoperation was 7.0% after aortic root replacement and 13.0% after ascending aortic replacement surgery (P = 0.22). Among 102 patients with complete imaging data [mean follow-up, 4.7 (3.2) years], the estimated growth rate of the aortic root diameter was 0.22 mm/year, that of its area 7.19 mm²/year and that of its perimeter 0.43 mm/year.CONCLUSIONSWhen stringent selection criteria were used to determine the extent of proximal aortic reconstruction, aortic root replacement and ascending aortic replacement for type A aortic dissection achieved comparable clinical outcomes.     

Aortic dissection late after aortic valve replacement

We experienced 3 cases of an aortic dissection occurring late after an aortic valve replacement, and sucessfully treated by an aortic root replacement. An aortic dissection involving the ascending aorta can develop late after an aortic valve replacement, and such an occurrence is associated with a high mortality and morbidity. The development of effective surgical strategies at the initial aortic valve surgery, strict control of blood pressure after aortic valve replacement, serial evaluations of aortic size, and the prophylactic replacement of the ascending aorta for patients with aortic dilatation after aortic valve replacement, all play clinically important roles in preventing an aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement. When an aortic dissection occurs in patients with a previous aortic valve replacement, an aortic root replacement should be performed in order to avoid leaving the fragile diseased aortic wall including the sinus of Valsalva.     

Ruptured giant aneurysm of the ascending aorta caused by chronic aortic dissection

A 55-year-old man developed acute chest pain and dyspnea. Computed tomography demonstrated a rupture of a giant aneurysm of the ascending aorta. The lesion was 14 cm in diameter—the largest ever reported—and resulted from chronic aortic dissection. The patient did not have aortic insufficiency or aortic dissection around the coronary ostium. Graft replacement of the ascending aorta was performed successfully under deep hypothermia with right hemisphere perfusion.     

Distal arch aneurysm and acute aortic dissection with bicuspid aortic valve; report of a case

A 49-year-old man was admitted to our institution with acute chest and back pain. Chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed type A aortic dissection from the ascending aorta to the bilateral common iliac arteries and a distal arch aneurysm with a diameter of 65 mm. Echocardiogram showed a bicuspid aortic valve with severe regurgitation. We performed total arch replacement and aortic valve replacement. Pathological examination of the aortic wall revealed a typical cystic medial necrosis. After 3 months, we performed the 2nd stage operation for the distal arch aneurysm and descending aortic dissection. Here, we report a rare case of bileaflet aortic valve with aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection.     

Ascending aortic aneurysm following aortico-ventricular tunnel repair

Aortico-left ventricular tunnel is a very rare congenital anomaly. An 18-year-old boy had undergone tunnel closure at 3 years of age. A moderate degree of aortic regurgitation remained postoperatively. Seven years later, aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation was performed. Eight years later, the ascending aortic aneurysm had grown to 63 mm in diameter. This dilatation became an operative indication. Ascending aortic replacement was performed with a Dacron graft. Pathological examination of the resected aortic wall revealed cystic medial degeneration. We report a rare case of ascending aortic aneurysm following surgical repair of the aortico-left ventricular tunnel and aortic valve replacement. (Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 54:182-184)     

Modified Bentall operation with concomitant total aortic arch replacement for DeBakey type I aortic dissection: Report of a case

The successful implementation of a reoperative Bentall procedure with concomitant total aortic arch replacement after ascending aortic replacement for acute aortic dissection is infrequently reported. We performed a modified Bentall procedure with total replacement of the aortic arch in a patient suffering from worsening aortic regurgitation (AR) and residual dissection. Our strategy involved the button method for coronary reconstruction, selective cerebral perfusion, the use of a composite graft with four branches for aortic arch replacement, and the administration of high-dose aprotinin to decrease bleeding.     

Aortoiliac dissection due to aortic cannulation

A case of acute aortoiliac dissection due to cannulation of the ascending aorta for extracorporeal circulation is reported. Although this patient was proved to have cystic medial necrosis, the exact cause of the dissection is not known. It is suggested that insertion of the cannula perpendicular to the aorta with penetration of all aortic layers may help to minimize this problem. Other patients with dissection of the ascending aorta are reviewed, and the central role of cystic medial necrosis as a causative factor is stressed.     

Surgery for aortic dissection associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve

Congenital bicuspid aortic valve is a relatively rare malformation. It is reported that the presence of this anomaly predisposes the patient to the development of dissecting aortic aneurysms. Between 1981 and October 1997, 7 patients with aortic dissection associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve underwent surgical treatment at our institution. The patients consisted of six males and one female. The age of the patients ranged from 54 to 74 years (mean 61 years). The classification of dissecting aortic aneurysms was DeBakey type I dissection in 4 patients, type II dissection in 2 patients and type IIIb dissection in 1 patient. These 7 patients constituted 2.0% (7/356) of all cases of surgical operation for dissecting thoracic aneurysm. Aortic valve dysfunction was noted in 5 patients, 4 of whom had previously undergone aortic valve replacement. We performed graft replacement of the ascending aorta in 4 patients, graft replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic arch in 2 patients, and graft replacement of the descending aorta in 1 patient. There were no hospital deaths in any of the 7 patients. Pathological examination of surgical specimens of the aortic wall showed cystic medial necrosis in 2 patients and mucoid degeneration in 4 patients. In addition to complication by valve dysfunction, patients with congenital bicuspid aortic valve are at risk for the development of aortic dissection.     

Surgically treated aortic root aneurysm following aortic valve replacement

A 65-year-old man with aortic regurgitation underwent aortic valve replacement with a St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve about 6 years ago. At that time, the aortic root was slightly dilated at about 40 mm in diameter and the ascending aorta was within the normal range. This year, the man was diagnosed with an aortic root aneurysm in regular follow-up echocardiography. Chest-enhanced computed tomography and chest aortography at our hospital demonstrated a pear-like aortic root aneurysm about 60 mm in diameter. Elective operation for the aortic root aneurysm was conducted September 29, 1999, based on the Bentall procedure. Composite graft replacement with coronary reconstruction was conducted using a 28-mm Hemashield prosthetic graft and a 23-mm St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve under cardiopulmonary bypass. An 8-mm Hemashield graft was interposed on the left main coronary artery and the right coronary artery was directly anastomosed using a Carrel patch method. The postoperative course was uneventful and post-operative examination demonstrated good surgical results. Histological findings of the aortic aneurysm wall showed cystic medial necrosis. Surgical cases of aortic root aneurysm after aortic valve replacement are rare, but serious complications with the possibility of rupture or dissection warrant surgical intervention.     

Surgical implication of aortic dissection on long-term outcome in marfan patients

We herein review our 17-year surgical experience for the treatment of ascending aortic aneurysm in patients with Marfan syndrome to clarify the risks of increased mortality and reoperation. The subjects consisted of 15 patients who had all undergone surgery for the aortic root and ascending aorta at Niigata University Hospital between July 1978 and January 1995. Aortic valve replacement and ascending aortic wrapping were performed in 5 patients, Bentall or Cabrol operation in 6, and combined aortic arch reconstruction and Carbrol operation in 2, as the initial surgery. Patients who had an aortic dissection (Stanford type A) at initial surgery were assigned to group I (n=7), while those with an aortic root aneurysm were assigned to group II (n=8). In group I, 3 patients required a second operation for the remaining aortic arch aneurysm, and 1 died due to a late rupture of the distal aneurysm. In group II, no patient needed a reoperation; however, 1 died due to an intracranial hemorrhage and another due to composite valve graft failure and distal dissection. The results thus indicate that aortic dissection seems to affect long-term outcome, and therefore the combined repair of the aortic root and transverse arch is recommended in Marfan patients with aortic dissection involving the transverse aortic arch.     

Acute type a aortic dissection complicated with acute inferior myocardial infarction following aortic valve replacement

Acute aortic dissection complicated with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the most fatal situation. We experienced the successful treatment for acute type A aortic dissection complicated with inferior AMI following aortic valve replacement (AVR). A 60-year-old man had had AVR for aortic regurgitation. Sixteen months after the AVR, he had a sudden onset of severe chest pain with complete atrioventricular block. Immediately, temporary pacing and cardiac catheterization were conducted, showing the occlusion of the right coronary artery due to acute type A aortic dissection. On his way to our hospital, direct current shock was conducted 3 times for ventricular fibrillation. We replaced the ascending aorta combined with coronary artery bypass grafting and the postoperative course was uneventful. The key to treat acute aortic dissection complicated with AMI is early accurate diagnosis, prompt temporary pacing for bradycardia, defibrillation for lethal arrhythmia and insertion of a perfusion catheter if possible. These preoperative hemodynamic stabilization gives us the chance to save these patients.     

Surgery for aortic dissection involving an aberrant right subclavian artery

On diagnosis of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection with an aberrant right subclavian artery, emergency operation was performed. Aortic arch replacement was undertaken with additional ‘elephant trunk’ procedure to cover the entry site and decrease the blood flow through the false lumen. We consider this technique will become one of the effective procedures for acute aortic dissection involving an aberrant right subclavian artery.     

Concomitant David’s operation and total arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection

A 61-year-old man complained of chest pain and developed congestive heart failure due to massive acute aortic regurgitation. Computed tomographic scan demonstrated Stanford type A aortic dissection from the aortic root to common iliac arteries. David’s aortic valve sparing operation and total aortic arch replacement were applied to the patient, because the aortic dissection was extended into two aortic commissures and all arch vessels, though the tear was present at the proximal ascending aorta. The surgery was well tolerated without any significant complication.     

Non-A non-B acute aortic dissection with entry tear in the aortic arch

Open in a separate window OBJECTIVESOur aim was to describe the outcomes of the latest treatment options of acute non-A non-B aortic dissection involving an entry tear in the aortic arch.METHODSIncluded were patients who presented between January 2001 and February 2020 with a non-A non-B aortic dissection involving the aortic arch but not the ascending aorta and with the most proximal entry tear located within the aortic arch between the innominate and left subclavian artery. Clinical data and operative details were retrieved from medical histories and surgical protocols. Preoperative, postoperative and follow-up computed tomography angiography scans were analysed.RESULTSWe analysed a total of 39 patients [median age 62 (52; 67) years, men 76.9%] with non-A non-B arch entry aortic dissections type. They underwent 15 thoracic endovascular aortic repairs, 20 frozen elephant trunk implantations, 1 hybrid arch replacement, or 1 conventional arch replacement. Two patients were managed conservatively. Twelve (31%) patients underwent emergent intervention, 12 (31%) were treated invasively within 2 weeks. Another 2 (5%) and 9 (23%) patients were treated 2 and 4 weeks after dissection occurred, respectively. Six (15%) patients presented with an impending aortic rupture, while 19 (49%) had at least one malperfused organ. Four patients (27%) died after thoracic endovascular aortic repair; the 30-day mortality following frozen elephant trunk was 0%.CONCLUSIONSNon-A non-B acute aortic dissection reveals a frequently complicated course requiring emergency intervention. The majority of patients required aortic arch repair within the first 2 weeks. Total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique seems to be low procedural mortality, and may become the treatment of choice in arch entry non-A non-B aortic dissection.     

Acute type B aortic dissection

Aortic dissection is infrequent in everyday practice; however, it can result in life-threatening complications and causes more deaths each year in the UK than road traffic collisions. It is one of the family of acute aortic syndromes, which includes penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) and intramural haematoma (IMH). Type A aortic dissections involve the ascending aorta and arch and almost invariably require prompt surgical treatment due to exceptionally high early 48-hour mortality without surgery. Many type B aortic dissections (TBAD) are not complicated at presentation and can be treated conservatively in high dependency and discharged without intervention. Complicated aortic dissection requires intervention, often with a thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The survival after TBAD is higher than type A dissection that invariably requires emergency operative intervention, with 65% of patients surviving to 1 year. Following acute aortic syndrome, best medical therapy involves tight blood pressure and heart rate control using beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers. Statin therapy may be of benefit. Regular cross-sectional imaging surveillance is important to detect late complications such as aortic dilatation. In type B aortic dissection, aortic dilatation is a common cause of late rupture with only 50% of patients surviving after 5 years without intervention. One of the most important questions at present is whether people at high risk of further aortic dilatation can be identified and intervened on early to prevent these late complications?     

Acceleration-induced acute type A aortic dissection in the sky: 10-year follow-up

Acute aortic dissection is uncommon, but can turn into a fatal disease if not managed quickly. A 49-year-old male fighter pilot presented to us after sudden excruciating chest pain during a flight at the moment of an acute spiral down action. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography showed Stanford type A aortic dissection that required surgical ascending aorta and hemiarch replacement with uneventful postoperative recovery and 10-year follow-up. Here, we presented the first report of a previously healthy pilot developed acute aortic dissection in the sky. Physicians should be aware of such a case that might happen more common with rapid aviation progress.     

Progress in treatment of ascending aortic aneurysms due to dissection,arteriosclerosis, or cystic medial degeneration

The recent results of surgical treatment of ascending aortic aneurysms caused by dissection, arteriosclerosis, or cystic medial degeneration are reviewed. Important technical advances and the various techniques currently employed are examined. Recent improvements in the results of surgical treatment of acute dissections have resulted in a more aggressive surgical approach with early operative intervention. For patients with cystic medial degeneration treated by supracoronary graft replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve replacement, late development of aneuryms of the sinuses of Valsalva suggests that composite graft replacement to exclude the aortic sinuses may be the preferred method of treatment.     

A case of type A dissection involving right aortic arch

Aortic dissection involving right aortic arch (RAA) is quite rare. A patient with RAA and aberrant left subclavian artery (type 3 RAA) developed type A dissection, but successfully underwent ascending and hemiarch replacement under hypothermic circulatory arrest with continuous retrograde cerebral perfusion. We approached the lesion through a midline sternotomy and could reconstruct the first two arch vessels involved by the dissection. We would have added bilateral thoracotomy, if the distal arch vessels had required reconstruction. To our knowledge, this is the first report of successful surgical repair for type A dissection involving RAA.     

The role of ascending aortic size in outcomes of patients with uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection

Objective

Recent studies demonstrate that uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection (uATBAD) patients with enlarged descending thoracic aortic diameters are at high risk for development of complications. This study aimed to determine the association of maximum ascending aortic diameter and area and outcomes in patients with uATBAD.

Successful surgical treatment for acute aortic dissection in pregnancy with Marfan’s syndrome

A 34-year-old pregnant woman with Marfan’s syndrome in the 34th week of gestation was diagnosed with acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection. Immediately after cesarean section, she underwent emergent operation of combined total aortic arch and aortic root replacement using cardiopulmonary bypass, deep hypothermia and antegrade cerebral perfusion. Both maternal and fetal outcomes were good and uneventful. Pregnancy increases the risk of aortic dissection especially for patients with Marfan’s syndrome. Moreover it should be noted that cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermia generally results in fetal loss. If fetal maturity can be confirmed as in our case, cesarean section should be done before cardiovascular surgery. We describe here a case of successful operation for mother and infant at the 34th week of gestation.