Patterns of brain atrophy in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and compare the patterns of cerebral atrophy associated with two clinical variants of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD): frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and semantic dementia (SemD). METHODS: Twenty patients with FTLD were classified as having FTD (N = 8) or SemD (N = 12) based on current clinical criteria. Both groups showed a similar spectrum of behavioral abnormalities, as indicated by the neuropsychiatric inventory. T1-weighted MRI was obtained for each patient and 20 control subjects. The regions of focal gray matter tissue loss associated with both FTD and SemD, as well as those differing between the two groups were examined using voxel-based morphometry. RESULTS: Regions of significant atrophy seen in both groups were located in the ventromedial frontal cortex, the posterior orbital frontal regions bilaterally, the insula bilaterally, and the left anterior cingulate cortex. The FTD, but not the SemD, group showed atrophy in the right dorsolateral frontal cortex and the left premotor cortex. The SemD, but not the FTD, group showed tissue loss in the anterior temporal cortex and the amygdala/anterior hippocampal region bilaterally. CONCLUSIONS: Although FTD and SemD are associated with different overall patterns of brain atrophy, regions of gray matter tissue loss in the orbital frontal, insular, and anterior cingulate regions are present in both groups. The authors suggest that pathology in the areas of atrophy associated with both FTD and SemD may underlie some the behavioral symptoms seen in the two disorders.     

Deformation-based morphometry reveals brain atrophy in frontotemporal dementia

OBJECTIVE: To compare deformation-based maps of local anatomical size between subjects with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and healthy subjects to identify regions of the brain involved in FTD. DESIGN: Structural magnetic resonance images were obtained from 22 subjects with FTD and 22 cognitively normal, age-matched controls. We applied deformation-based morphometry and compared anatomy between groups using an analysis of covariance model that included a categorical variable denoting group membership and covaried for head size. SETTING: University of California, San Francisco, Memory and Aging Center, and the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS: Twenty-two subjects with FTD and 22 cognitively normal, age-matched controls. INTERVENTIONS: Neurological, neuropsychological, and functional evaluations and magnetic resonance imaging. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Deformation maps of local anatomical size. RESULTS: Patients with FTD showed extensive, significant atrophy of the frontal lobes, affecting both gray matter and white matter. Atrophy of similar magnitude but less significance was observed in the anterior temporal lobes. The subcortical and midbrain regions, particularly the thalamus, pons, and superior and inferior colliculi, showed strongly significant atrophy of smaller magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed frontal and anterior temporal gray matter atrophy in FTD. The observed white matter loss, thalamic involvement, and midbrain atrophy are consistent with pathological findings in late-stage FTD. Dysfunction of ventral-frontal-brainstem circuitry may underlie some of the unique clinical features of FTD.     

Distribution of brain atrophy in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

Marked brain atrophy occurs in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) yet substantial variation between cases is seen. Recently, a four-level staging scheme which reflects increasing disease duration, severity of dementia and degree of neurodegeneration was described. In the present study, the extent and magnitude of atrophy in behavioral variant FTD and its relationship to disease duration and pathological subtype was further evaluated by quantifying the volume of 30 anatomically-defined regions. A validated point count technique was applied to 17 patients with FTD (9 Pick's disease, 6 dementia lacking distinctive histology, 2 FTD with motor neuron disease) and 21 controls. Atrophy was seen in all brain regions except the inferior frontal cortex and area 37. As might be expected, increasing severity of atrophy occurred with increasing disease duration and stage however measurable atrophy was more widespread than indicated by the staging scheme. Furthermore, severity of atrophy was not related to pathological subtype. Frontal, limbic and temporal regions appeared to be severely affected early in the disease process with temporal lobe atrophy the best predictor of disease duration. White matter, more posterior regions and the subcortex were affected later in the disease. These findings demonstrate a pattern of selective vulnerability which progresses over time. Furthermore, they demonstrate that although patients with a similar clinical subtype may have differing underlying histopathology, the pattern, severity and progression of brain atrophy is the same. This suggests that the regional pattern of neurodegeneration, rather than the type of histopathology influences the clinical syndrome in FTD.     

Brainstem atrophy is linked to extrapyramidal symptoms in frontotemporal dementia

Journal of Neurology - Extrapyramidal (EP) symptoms are a known feature in a subpopulation of patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Concomitant EP symptoms with FTD-like...     

Lobar atrophy in frontotemporal dementia: diagnostic and prognostic implications

We review the practical importance of lobar atrophy in frontotemporal dementia (FTD), for diagnosis and prognosis. We discuss specific patterns of frontotemporal atrophy that denote clinical and pathological subtypes of FTD (e.g. semantic dementia). We also discuss the unsatisfactory clinical experience of interpreting MRI scans in individual FTD cases, especially the behavioural presentations (without aphasic or motor impairments). This issue is explored by examining the FTD phenocopy concept. Lobar atrophy emerges as a key observation in defining behavioural FTD patients whose symptoms are likely to progress. In a situation where objective clinical data are few, we highlight the importance of applying caution before diagnosing FTD is the absence of visible brain atrophy.     

Rates of global and regional cerebral atrophy in AD and frontotemporal dementia.

OBJECTIVE: Serial registered MRI provides a reproducible technique for detecting progressive cerebral atrophy in vivo and was used to determine if there were differences between the rates of cerebral atrophy in AD and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). METHODS: Eighty-four patients with dementia (54 AD and 30 FTD) and 27 age-matched control subjects each had at least two volumetric MR scans. Serial scans were positionally matched (registered), and brain volume loss was determined by calculation of the brain boundary shift integral. RESULTS: There was a difference between the rates of whole-brain atrophy in patients (mean annual volume loss 2.7% of total brain volume) and in control subjects (mean annual volume loss 0.5%). AD and FTD were associated with different rates of atrophy (mean annual losses 2.4 and 3.2%). The range of atrophy rates in the FTD group (0.3 to 8.0%) greatly exceeded that in the AD group (0.5 to 4.7%). Frontal-variant FTD was associated with a wider range of atrophy rates than temporal-variant FTD. Analysis of regional brain atrophy rates revealed that there was widespread symmetrically distributed cerebral volume loss in AD, whereas in frontal FTD there was greater atrophy anteriorly and in temporal FTD the atrophy rate was greatest in the left anterior cerebral cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Both AD and FTD patients had increased rates of brain atrophy. Whereas the patients with AD were associated with a relatively restricted spread of atrophy rates, the greater spread of rates observed in the patients with FTD may reflect the heterogeneity of disease in FTD, with differences observed between frontal and temporal FTD. Increased rates of whole-brain atrophy did not discriminate AD from FTD, but analysis of regional atrophy rates revealed marked differences between patient groups.     

Topographical patterns of lobar atrophy in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Fronto-temporal dementia (FTD) designates a group of relatively common neurodegenerative disorders. The aim of this study was to characterize the patterns of brain atrophy in FTD compared to Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: A novel semiautomatic volumetric MRI analysis method was applied to measure regional brain volumes in FTD (n = 15; behavioural variant n = 9, language variant n = 6) in contrast with AD patients (n = 15) and age-matched controls (NC) (n = 15). FTD and AD patients were matched on demographic measures and Mini Mental State Examination scores. RESULTS: Significant atrophy was present in the frontal and anterior temporal lobes of subjects with FTD compared to AD (p = 0.02; effect size = 1.11) and compared to NC (p < 0.001; effect size = 1.86). Severe atrophy of the left anterior temporal region distinguished the language variant. AD patients, by contrast, did not differ from NC for frontal lobe volume but had smaller anterior temporal lobes (p = 0.03). Both dementia groups had medial temporal lobe atrophy of similar magnitude. A logistic regression model including 4 regional measures correctly classified 100% of subjects. CONCLUSION: FTD can be reliably differentiated from AD by virtue of a topographical pattern of atrophy involving the frontal lobes and anterior temporal regions. Medial temporal lobe volumes do not distinguish FTD from AD.     

Frontal paralimbic network atrophy in very mild behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

BACKGROUND: Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) strikes hardest at the frontal lobes, but the sites of earliest injury remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine atrophy patterns in distinct clinical stages of bvFTD, testing the hypothesis that the mildest stage is restricted to frontal paralimbic cortex. DESIGN: A bvFTD cohort study. SETTING: University hospital dementia clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with bvFTD with Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale scores of 0.5 (n = 15), 1 (n = 15), or 2 to 3 (n = 15) age and sex matched to each other and to 45 healthy controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Magnetic resonance voxel-based morphometry estimated gray matter and white matter atrophy at each disease stage compared with controls. RESULTS: Patients with a CDR score of 0.5 had gray matter loss in frontal paralimbic cortices, but atrophy also involved a network of anterior cortical and subcortical regions. A CDR score of 1 showed more extensive frontal gray matter atrophy and white matter losses in corpus callosum and brainstem. A CDR score of 2 to 3 showed additional posterior insula, hippocampus, and parietal involvement, with white matter atrophy in presumed frontal projection fibers. CONCLUSIONS: Very mild bvFTD targets a specific subset of frontal and insular regions. More advanced disease affects white matter and posterior gray matter structures densely interconnected with the sites of earliest injury.     

Two cases of frontotemporal dementia with predominant temporal lobe atrophy

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a subtype of frontotemporal lobar degeneration, which also includes semantic dementia (SD) and progressive non‐fluent aphasia. Frontotemporal dementia is characterized by changes in personality and behavioral abnormalities, generally associated with predominant frontal lobe atrophy. Conversely, SD is typically characterized by Gogi (word meaning) aphasia based on semantic memory impairment and is associated with predominant temporal lobe atrophy. However, in the present cases, we diagnosed FTD on the basis of clinical symptoms, such as disinhibition, indifference, and stereotypy, without semantic memory impairment, even though neuroimaging showed predominant temporal lobe atrophy. We suggest that clinical symptoms are the most important cues for an accurate clinical diagnosis and there is no exclusive relationship between the syndrome and atrophy of the temporal lobes.     

Clinicopathological staging of frontotemporal dementia severity: correlation with regional atrophy

The pattern and degree of brain atrophy in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) has the potential for use as an aid in the diagnosis of this disorder and its differentiation from other neurodegenerative diseases. However, before this can occur, the sequence and progression of atrophy needs to be fully elucidated. Recently, we have described a four-point scheme for staging the severity of degeneration in FTD, which correlates with both duration of disease and severity of dementia [Broe M., et al.: Neurology 2003;60:1005-1011]. When volumetric analysis is performed in post-mortem-confirmed cases of FTD, atrophy of all lobes is present by stage 2 and then progresses with successive stages. Within each lobe, there is variation in the degree of atrophy between different functionally discreet brain regions with some regions showing marked atrophy and others showing little. Much of the frontal lobe, the amygdala and hippocampus are severely atrophic by stage 2, suggesting that they are some of the earliest areas affected in FTD.     

Inheritance of frontotemporal dementia.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of families with fronto-temporal dementia (FTD) support an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, but most studies have described genetic transmission in individual families specifically selected for the presence of multiple affected individuals. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the familial presentation and inheritance of FTD and related disorders among a large group of FTD index cases unselected for family history of dementia. DESIGN AND SETTING: We interviewed family members and reviewed medical records and autopsy reports at a university hospital and a university-affiliated hospital to determine the frequency of familial FTD and the most likely mode of inheritance. Characteristic families with the disorder are described, along with the history, clinical findings, and neuroimaging results in affected members of these families. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: The 42 index cases of FTD had a mean age of onset of 56.1 years (range, 40-69 years). Of these patients, 21 (50%) were women. All but one of the patients were white. Participants included male and female spouses and children of the index cases. family member with an FTD spectrum disorder and were considered familial cases. The majority (17 [89%]) of familial FTD cases showed a pattern consistent with dominant inheritance. If depression is excluded, familial cases decrease from 19 (45%) to 17 (40%), of which 15 (88%) showed a dominant transmission pattern. The initial presentations in the nonindex familial cases varied but most frequently consisted of personality and behavioral changes that preceded cognitive impairment (19 [43%]), followed by psychiatric illness (14 [33%]), dementia without behavioral change (5 [11%]), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (5 [11%]), and parkinsonism (2[5%]). Two of the affected nonindex cases had dual presenting diagnoses. The average age of onset was 56.1 years and did not differ significantly between familial and nonfamilial cases. Onset of FTD-related symptoms occurred after the age of 65 years in only 4(10%) of 42 index cases and 3 (5%) of 60 affected relatives. CONCLUSIONS: Familial FTD is usually inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. The initial onset is insidious, often consisting of mood and behavioral changes occurring in presenile years that are often erroneously attributed to other nonneurologic causes. Although the precise incidence of FTD in North America is not known, it is one of the most common presenile dementias.     

Patterns of frontal lobe atrophy in frontotemporal dementia: a volumetric MRI study

OBJECTIVES: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD), the second commonest degenerative cause of dementia under the age of 65, often presents with striking changes in behaviour and personality in association with frontal lobe atrophy. Based on the behavioural changes observed in FTD, it is commonly assumed that the orbitofrontal cortex is the earliest and most severely affected frontal sub-region. However, evidence to support this assumption has to date been largely lacking. METHODS: Using a novel volumetric MRI method, we performed a detailed volumetric analysis of six frontal regions in 12 subjects with the frontal or behavioural variant of FTD (fvFTD) and 12 age-, education- and sex-matched normal controls. The regions studied were: the orbitofrontal and insula regions (representing the orbitobasal cortex); the inferior and middle frontal regions (representing the dorsolateral prefrontal areas); and the superior frontal and anterior cingulate regions (representing the medial prefrontal areas). RESULTS: As a group, the fvFTD patients showed atrophy involving all six regions. We then segregated the 12 patients into three sub-groups according to their overall degree of atrophy. In the mildest group (n = 3) all regions fell within 2 standard deviations of normal. In the intermediate group (n = 6) only the orbitofrontal region (bilaterally) fell clearly outside the control range (>2 z scores below the control mean); the next most atrophic region in this group was the right insular region. The severe group (n = 3) had generalized atrophy throughout the frontal regions measured. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, patients with the earliest stages of fvFTD show no significant loss of volume in any frontal lobe area as measured by a novel MRI volumetric technique. When volume loss does occur, changes are initially seen in the orbitofrontal cortex before atrophy becomes more widespread. These results provide some partial support for the often-quoted assumption that the orbitofrontal cortex is the locus of earliest pathology in fvFTD, although these findings must be regarded as preliminary in view of the small numbers of patients involved.     

Amyloid Abeta40 CSF concentrations correlate to frontal lobe atrophy in frontotemporal dementia

We wanted to further study amyloid Abeta protein alterations in non-AD neurodegenerative diseases. Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of the amyloid Abeta protein with 40 (Abeta40) and 42 (Abeta42) amino acid residues were measured in eleven patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Abeta40 and Abeta42 concentrations were related to the degree of frontal lobe atrophy as assessed with MRI volumetry. Abeta40 concentrations showed a statistically significant linear correlation with degree of frontal lobe atrophy (r = -0.77, p<0.02). Similar results have not been found in previous studies of CSF Abeta40 concentrations and atrophy in patients with AD which suggest that the role of Abeta40 differs between the pathological processes of FTD and AD.     

Neuroimaging in frontotemporal dementia

Abstract

The term frontotemporal dementia (FTD) refers to a group of neurodegenerative disorders that are associated with atrophy of the frontal and temporal lobes, and present clinically with impairments of behaviour or language. Three main subtypes are described, behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD) and two subtypes of the language presentation (known as primary progressive aphasia or PPA) called semantic variant of PPA and non-fluent variant of PPA. Most imaging studies of FTD have used volumetric T1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or positron emissions tomography imaging to identify patterns of grey matter atrophy or hypometabolism in these different subtypes, but more recently newer imaging techniques have been used to help define abnormalities in structural connectivity (white matter tract integrity using diffusion tensor imaging), functional connectivity (resting state networks using resting state functional MRI) and perfusion (using arterial spin labelling perfusion MRI) in FTD. These techniques have the potential to improve the differential diagnosis of FTD from other disorders and to provide more informative imaging signatures of FTD syndromes.     

Misdemeanor in frontotemporal dementia

The nature and prevalence of misdemeanor in patients with dementia due to frontotemporal lobar degeneration has been described in a few case reports and in two small U.S. studies. Our clinical impression suggests that antisocial and aggressive behaviour are relatively frequent in this patient population. The objective of the present study was to verify this observation. For this purpose we developed a standardized questionnaire on misdemeanor in Frontotemporal Dementia. Using this instrument caregivers of 30 patients with Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD), 11 patients with Semantic dementia (SD) and 33 patients with Alzheimer-type dementia (AD) were interviewed. The interview included questions about theft, burglary, damaging other peoples' belongings, verbal or physical offence, bodily harm, drug abuse and use of weapons. Questions about the frequency of criminal behaviour, the amount of damages and consequences if applicable completed the questionnaire. Misdemeanor was found in half of the patients with FTD (15 out of 30) and in 7 out of 11 patients with SD, but only in one out of 33 patients with AD. The most frequent type of inappropriate behaviour was theft (13 patients), particularly shoplifting. 8 patients with FTD, 1 patient with SD and 1 patient with AD entered someone else's house without permission. 10 patients with FTD and 3 patients with SD but none of the patients with AD had physically threatened spouses, relatives or strangers. In one case another person was hurt.