Polyomavirus Nephropathy in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients

Given the limited information regarding BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVN) in pediatric kidney transplant recipients, we assessed the incidence, risk factors, clinical and virologic features of BKVN in pediatric renal transplant recipients at a single transplant center by means of a retrospective cohort study. Histologically confirmed BKVN developed in 6 of 173 (3.5%) kidney transplant recipients at a median of 15 months post-transplant (range: 4-47 months). At a median follow-up of 28 months (range: 5-32), all patients had functioning grafts with mean creatinine and GFR of 1.9 mg/dL and 58 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. At the time of diagnosis, all cases had viruria (median 6.1 x 10(6) copies/mL, range: 10(5) to 3.9 x 10(8) copies/mL) and viremia (median 21,000 copies/mL, range: 10,000-40,000 copies/mL). Recipient seronegativity for BKV was significantly associated with the development of BKVN (p = 0.01). BKVN is an important cause of late allograft dysfunction and is strongly associated with recipient seronegativity in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Further studies to confirm this finding and to define the clinical utility of routine pre-transplant BKV serologic testing are warranted.     

Polyomavirus BK and JC infections in well matched Finnish kidney transplant recipients

Since 2003, only one case of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) has occurred in our clinic despite screening protocols. In contrast to BK virus, the role of JC virus in PVAN is unclear. We studied the incidence and impact of polyomavirus BK and JC viruria and PVAN in well-matched Finnish kidney transplant recipients. All Helsinki University Hospital kidney transplant recipients between 2004 and 2006 were prospectively followed ( n  = 163). Patients with a 12-month protocol-biopsy taken and polyomavirus urinary secretion screened by PCR were studied ( n  = 68). Cyclosporine-based triple-drug immunosuppression was usually used. BK or JC viruria was detected in 18 (27%) and 14 (21%) patients after transplantation respectively. Persistent BK or JC viruria was found in 5 (7%) and 9 (13%) patients. No cases of PVAN were diagnosed from protocol biopsies or from biopsies taken for clinical indications. A positive BK or JC viruria or persistent viruria was not associated with reduced renal function at follow-up, histopathologic changes in 12-month protocol biopsies, or acute rejections. The incidence of BK and JC viruria was similar to what has been previously reported, but no cases of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy were seen in our well-matched kidney transplant population.     

Preemptive Retransplantation for BK Virus Nephropathy: Successful Outcome Despite Active Viremia

BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) is now recognized as a major cause of renal allograft loss. Recent reports suggest that retransplantation in patients with graft loss due to BKVN is safe after return to dialysis. Since early transplantation is associated with improved outcomes, it would be advantageous if this procedure could be performed prior to ultimate graft loss. However, little data are available regarding the safety of this approach during active viremia. In this report, we describe successful preemptive retransplantation with simultaneous allograft nephrectomy in two patients with active BKVN and viremia at the time of surgery. With 21- and 12-month follow-up, respectively, both patients have stable allograft function and no evidence for active viral replication. We conclude that preemptive retransplantation can be considered in patients with failing allografts due to BKVN.     

Polyomavirus Nephropathy in Native Kidneys of Non-Renal Transplant Recipients

Chronic renal dysfunction is common in non-renal solid organ (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients and is commonly attributed to calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, often without renal histopathologic evaluation. Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) is an important cause of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients but has rarely been reported in native kidneys of non-renal transplant recipients. We report the clinical, pathologic and virologic features of PVN in native kidneys of two allograft recipients. In both, severe renal dysfunction was accompanied by histopathologic evidence of PVN, including characteristic viral inclusions by routine stains, immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy. High levels of BK virus (BKV) DNA were detected in kidney tissue of patients using BKV-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In 1 patient, high levels of BKV DNA were detected in plasma and urine, and administration of low-dose cidofovir was associated with clearance of BK viremia. These results extend the populations in which PVN has been documented in native kidneys to include heart and stem cell transplant recipients, and suggest that cidofovir has activity against BKV in vivo. Studies to define the incidence and potential contribution of PVN to chronic renal dysfunction commonly attributed to calcineurin inhibitor toxicity in non-renal transplant recipients are warranted.     

Tubular Basement Membrane Immune Deposits in Association with BK Polyomavirus Nephropathy

Tubular basement membrane immune deposits (TBMID) are rare in renal allografts and usually have been found in association with immune complex mediated glomerular injury. We report an association between TBMID and BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKN). We reviewed clinical data and results of allograft biopsies of 30 patients with BKN (16 with and 14 without TBMID). TBMID were detected by immunofluorescence or electron microscopy. Initial and follow-up biopsies were assessed for degree of interstitial inflammation and fibrosis and severity of viral infection, and were correlated with patients' clinical data. Biopsies initially diagnostic for BKN with TBMID, compared to BKN biopsies without deposits, demonstrated more severe interstitial inflammation and fibrosis, and greater numbers of virally infected cells. Similar findings were present in follow-up biopsies. Utilizing three different antibodies directed against viral epitopes, viral antigens could not be detected within TBMID. Thirty percent of patients with TBMID and 70% without deposits had follow-up biopsies, in which virus could not be detected immunohistochemically. Treatment for all included decreasing immunosuppression, cidofovir and/or leflunomide. Clinical data correlated well with histological findings. We conclude that a significant proportion of patients with BKN show TBMID on kidney biopsy. The prognostic significance of this finding remains to be elucidated.     

Polyomavirus BK Replication Dynamics In Vivo and In Silico to Predict Cytopathology and Viral Clearance in Kidney Transplants

Fast BK virus (BKV) replication in renal tubular epithelial cells drives polyomavirus‐BK‐associated nephropathy (PVAN) to premature kidney transplant (KT) failure. BKV also replicates in urothelial cells, but remains asymptomatic in two‐thirds of affected KT patients. Comparing 518 day‐matched plasma‐urine samples from 223 KT patients, BKV loads were ～3000‐fold higher in urine than in plasma (p < 0.000001). Molecular and quantitative parameters indicated that >95% of urine BKV loads resulted from urothelial replication and <5% from tubular epithelial replication. Fast BKV replication dynamics in plasma and urine with half‐lives of <12 h accounted for daily urothelial and tubular epithelial cell loss of 4×10⁷ and 6×10⁷, respectively. BKV dynamics in both sites were only partly linked, with full and partial discordance in 36% and 32%, respectively. Viral expansion was best explained by models where BKV replication started in the kidney followed by urothelial amplification and tubular epithelial cell cross‐feeding reaching a dynamic equilibrium after ～10 weeks. Curtailing intrarenal replication by 50% was ineffective and >80% was required for clearing viremia within 7 weeks, but viruria persisted for >14 weeks. Reductions >90% cleared viremia and viruria by 3 and 10 weeks, respectively. The model was clinically validated in prospectively monitored KT patients supporting >80% curtailing for optimal interventions.     

Risk factors for BK polyomavirus nephritis in renal allograft recipients

Recurrent episodes of acute rejection (AR) and/or the intense immunosuppression used for their treatment have been proposed as risk factors for BK nephritis (BKN; BK refers to the initials of the first patient from whom this polyomavirus was isolated). To further examine the relationship between AR and BKN, we analyzed all kidney transplants performed at our center between January 1999 and August 2001 (n = 286). After a mean follow-up of 737 +/- 22 d, we identified nine cases of BKN (3.1%). The mean time to diagnosis of BKN was 326 +/- 56 d. No patient with BKN had a prior history of AR. During the same period, 62 patients were diagnosed with AR (22%). The mean time to diagnosis of AR was 197 +/- 40 d (p = 0.01 vs. time to diagnosis of BKN). Despite aggressive therapy with methylprednisolone and, in some cases, anti-lymphocyte antibody, none of these patients with AR developed BKN. We compared the baseline characteristics of patients in both groups and found that BKN patients were more likely to be white people (78 vs. 44%, p = 0.05) and male (89 vs. 53%, p = 0.04). Moreover, the mean tacrolimus (TAC) levels before diagnosis were higher in BKN than in AR patients (11.7 +/- 0.5 vs. 6.5 +/- 0.6 ng/mL, p < 0.001). In summary, our study shows that BKN often occurs in the absence of prior episodes of AR. In addition, our findings suggest that white males exposed to higher TAC levels are at greater risk of developing BKN.     

Incidence of BK with Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine and Impact of Preemptive Immunosuppression Reduction

Our purposes were to determine the incidence of BK viruria, viremia or nephropathy with tacrolimus (FK506) versus cyclosporine (CyA) and whether intensive monitoring and discontinuation of mycophenolate (MMF) or azathioprine (AZA), upon detection of BK viremia, could prevent BK nephropathy. We randomized 200 adult renal transplant recipients to FK506 (n = 134) or CyA (n = 66). Urine and blood were collected weekly for 16 weeks and at months 5, 6, 9 and 12 and analyzed for BK by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). By 1 year, 70 patients (35%) developed viruria and 23 (11.5%) viremia; neither were affected independently by FK506, CyA, MMF or AZA. Viruria was highest with FK506-MMF (46%) and lowest with CyA-MMF (13%), p = 0.005. Viruria >/= 9.5 log(10) copies/mL was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of viremia and a 13-fold increased risk of sustained viremia. After reduction of immunosuppression, viremia resolved in 95%, without increased acute rejection, allograft dysfunction or graft loss. No BK nephropathy was observed. Choice of calcineurin inhibitor or adjuvant immunosuppression, independently, did not affect BK viruria or viremia. Viruria was highest with FK506-MMF and lowest with CyA-MMF. Monitoring and preemptive withdrawal of immunosuppression were associated with resolution of viremia and absence of BK nephropathy without acute rejection or graft loss.     

Detection of BK polyomavirus after kidney transplantation: a comparison of urine electron microscopy with plasma polymerase chain reaction

BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection continues to be a significant source of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. The optimal screening method to detect BKV remains undetermined. In this retrospective analysis of 347 consecutive kidney transplant recipients, we compare the diagnostic and screening performance of urine electron microscopy (EM) with plasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in testing for BKV, using biopsy‐proved polyomavirus‐associated nephropathy (PVAN) as the gold standard. Sixty‐nine of 347 recipients had a positive screening test for BKV infection. Twenty‐nine patients underwent biopsy, and 11 were diagnosed with PVAN. Sensitivity rates of urine EM and plasma PCR were 88% and 100%, respectively. Specificity rates of urine EM and plasma PCR were 91% and 78%. There was no statistical difference in the operating characteristics of the two tests. The majority of both plasma PCR and urine EM tests were positive in the six months prior to a diagnostic biopsy confirming PVAN. In those patients who had evidence of BKV infection but did not have PVAN, the percentage of positive screening tests decreased with aggressive lowering of immunosuppression. We conclude that urine EM and plasma PCR both function well in screening for BKV infection and in the diagnosis of PVAN. There is an opportunity to detect viral replication, lower immunosuppression, and to prevent PVAN in this population.     

Polyomavirus BK Nephropathy: A (Re-)emerging Complication in Renal Transplantation

Persisting polyomavirus replication is now widely recognized as a (re-)emerging cause of renal allograft dysfunction. Up to 5% of renal allograft recipients can be affected about 40weeks (range 6-150) post-transplantation. Progression to irreversible failure of the allograft has been observed in up to 45% of all cases. The BK virus strain is involved in the majority of the cases. Risk factors may include treatment of rejection episodes and increasing viral replication under potent immunosuppressive drugs such as tacrolimus, sirolimus or mycophenolate. The diagnosis requires the histological demonstration of nuclear polyomavirus inclusions in affected tubular epithelial cells. Interstitial inflammatory infiltrates and fibrosis become more prominent in the persisting disease and may be difficult to distinguish from (coexisting) rejection. Detection of polyomavirus-inclusion bearing cells ('decoy cells') in the urine and quantification of BK virus DNA in the plasma have been proposed as surrogate markers for polyomavirus replication and allograft disease, respectively. Antiviral treatment is not yet established; however, reports of treatment with cidofovir are encouraging. Current management aims at the judicious modification and/or reduction of immunosuppression which, in view of preceding or concurrent rejection, is not without risk.     

Prospective Monitoring of Polyomavirus BK Replication and Impact of Pre-Emptive Intervention in Pediatric Kidney Recipients

Polyoma BK virus (BKV)-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is a relevant cause of poor renal allograft survival. In a prospective analysis, we monitored BKV DNA in blood and urine samples from 62 consecutive pediatric kidney recipients. In patients with BKV replication, we analyzed the impact of reduction of maintenance immunosuppression on viral load kinetics and PVAN in patients with BKV replication. BKV-specific immunity was concomitantly evaluated on blood samples of viremic patients, by measuring the frequency of BKV-specific interferon-gamma-producing and cytotoxic T cells, and BKV IgG antibody levels. At a median follow-up of 24 months, BK viruria was observed in 39 of 62 patients, while BK viremia developed in 13 patients (21%). In all viremic patients, immunosuppression reduction resulted in the clearance of viremia, and prevented development of PVAN, without increasing the rate of acute rejection or causing graft dysfunction. As a consequence of immunosuppression adjustment, an expansion of BKV-specific cellular immunity was observed that coincided with viral clearance. We conclude that treating pediatric kidney transplant patients pre-emptively with immunosuppression reduction guided by BKV DNA in blood is safe and effective to prevent onset of PVAN. BKV-specific cellular immunity may be useful to guide this intervention.     

BK Virus‐Specific Immunity Kinetics: A Predictor of Recovery From Polyomavirus BK‐Associated Nephropathy

Impaired BKV‐specific immunity is associated with development of BKV‐associated nephropathy. Suitable immunological parameters to identify patients at risk, however, are still debated. We monitored 18 kidney‐transplant recipients through the course of self‐limited BKV‐reactivation (n = 11) and BKV‐associated nephropathy (n = 7). BKV‐specific cellular immunity directed to nonstructural small and Large T‐antigen, and structural VP1–3 was analyzed in an interferon‐γ Elispot assay. BKV‐specific IgM and IgG were measured using an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay simultaneously. BKV‐specific cellular immunity directed to five BKV‐proteins increased significantly from diagnosis to resolution of BKV‐reactivation (p < 0.001). Patients with self‐limited BKV‐reactivation developed BKV‐specific T cells without therapeutic interventions, and cleared BKV‐reactivation within a median period of 1 month. Patients with BKV‐associated nephropathy, however, showed BKV‐specific T cells after a median period of 5 months after therapeutic interventions only, and cleared BKV‐reactivation after a median period of 8 months. Anti‐structural T cells were detected earlier than anti‐nonstructural T cells, which coincided with BKV‐clearance. Patients with BKV‐associated nephropathy showed the highest frequencies of BKV‐specific T cells at recovery, the highest increase in BKV‐specific IgG and persistence of increased IgM levels (p < 0.05). Our results suggest prognostic values of BKV‐specific immune monitoring to identify those patients at risk of BKV‐associated nephropathy and to aid in the management of therapeutic interventions.     

Pretransplantation Donor–Recipient Pair Seroreactivity Against BK Polyomavirus Predicts Viremia and Nephropathy After Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplant donors are not currently implicated in predicting BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection in kidney transplant recipients. It has been postulated, however, that BKPyV infection originates from the kidney allograft. Because BKPyV seroreactivity correlates with BKPyV replication and thus might mirror the infectious load, we investigated whether BKPyV seroreactivity of the donor predicts viremia and BKPyV‐associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) in the recipient. In a retrospective cohort of 407 living kidney donor–recipient pairs, pretransplantation donor and recipient sera were tested for BKPyV IgG levels and correlated with the occurrence of recipient BKPyV viremia and BKPyVAN within 1 year after transplantation. Donor BKPyV IgG level was strongly associated with BKPyV viremia and BKPyVAN (p < 0.001), whereas recipient BKPyV seroreactivity showed a nonsignificant inverse trend. Pairing of high–BKPyV‐seroreactive donors with low‐seroreactive recipients resulted in a 10‐fold increased risk of BKPyV viremia (hazard ratio 10.1, 95% CI 3.5–29.0, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, donor BKPyV seroreactivity was the strongest pretransplantation factor associated with viremia (p < 0.001) and BKPyVAN (p = 0.007). The proportional relationship between donor BKPyV seroreactivity and recipient infection suggests that donor BKPyV seroreactivity reflects the infectious load of the kidney allograft and calls for the use of pretransplantation BKPyV serological testing of (potential) donors and recipients.     

A direct association of polyomavirus BK viruria with deterioration of renal allograft function in renal transplant patients

Abstract: Background:  Polyomavirus BK virus (BKV) causes a BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN), frequently causing allograft dysfunction in renal transplant recipients. As BK viruria is a surrogate marker for early detection of BKVAN, the aim of this study was to clarify an association between BK viruria and allograft dysfunction in renal transplant recipients.
Methods:  One hundred and six renal transplant recipients with average 5.9-yr transplant duration received screening for quantification of BK viruria detected by real time polymerase chain reaction and were followed up for 12 months.
Results:  Twenty-six patients (25%) had detectable BK viruria. In comparison of the patients without BK viruria, more patients in the BK viruria group were treated with steroids and had a past history of acute rejection. There was no difference in sex, age, transplant duration, allograft type and previous cytomegalovirus infection. During follow-up, the patients with BK viruria had higher serum creatinine levels at the sixth, ninth and 12th month. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that BK viruria was the only risk factor for more than 25% or 50% rise of serum creatinine level above baseline at the end of one yr follow-up.
Conclusions:  BK viruria alone is associated with allograft dysfunction and early intervention is indicated.     

Renal Failure Five Years After Lung Transplantation Due to Polyomavirus BK‐Associated Nephropathy

Polyomavirus‐associated nephropathy (PyVAN) is rare in nonrenal solid organ transplantation and only limited information is available from single cases. We describe a 67‐year‐old female presenting with hypertension and progressive kidney failure due to PyVAN 60 months after lung transplantation. Plasma BK virus (BKV) loads were 4.85 log₁₀ copies/mL at diagnosis and cleared slowly over 14 months after switching from tacrolimus, mycophenolate and prednisone to low‐dose tacrolimus, sirolimus and leflunomide, the latter being discontinued for anemia and diarrhea. BKV‐ and JC virus‐specific immunoglobulins were detectable prior to transplantation. Only BKV‐specific IgG and IgM increased during follow‐up. BKV‐specific T cells were detectable in blood following in vitro expansion, but cleared with reincreased sirolimus, yet BKV viremia remained undetectable. We identified eight other cases of PyVAN in nonrenal solid organ transplantation including lung (n = 1), heart (n = 6) and pancreas (n = 1). Overall, diagnosis was later than commonly seen in kidney transplants (median 18 months, interquartile range 10–29). Seven patients were male, five received triple immunosuppression consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate, prednisone. Immunosuppression was reduced in four cases and cidofovir and/or leflunomide administered in five and two cases, respectively. Renal function deteriorated in five requiring hemodialysis in four. We discuss mTOR inhibitors versus cidofovir and leflunomide as potential PyVAN rescue therapy.     

Polyomavirus nephropathy in renal allograft: prevalence and correlation of histology with graft failure

BACKGROUND: While polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) is recognized as an emerging cause of graft loss in renal transplants, the prevalence rate of PVN in renal grafts is unclear in Taiwan. METHODS: Biopsies (n = 412) from 323 Taiwanese renal transplant patients were retrospectively analysed. PVN was diagnosed by the characteristic viropathic change in epithelial cells under light microscopic examination and a positive immunohistochemistry staining of anti-SV40 large T antigen. The viral cytopathic changes, interstitial inflammation, fibrosis and tubular atrophy were semiquantitatively assessed, based on the Banff 1997 classification and scoring for renal allograft. RESULTS: Seventeen cases were identified with evidence of PVN; the prevalence rate is 5.26%. Compared with non-PVN patients, they were more likely to have had previous rejection episodes, higher graft loss and shorter graft survival. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study showed that we have similar findings to other reports with at least 5% prevalence of PVN and that patients diagnosed early do better, while those diagnosed with severe inflammation or damage do worse or are likely to lose their grafts.     

Adjuvant Low-Dose Cidofovir Therapy for BK Polyomavirus Interstitial Nephritis in Renal Transplant Recipients

BK virus interstitial nephritis (BKVIN) is a serious complication after kidney grafting, necessitating drastic reduction of immunosuppressive therapy in order to enable viral clearance. Despite these measures, progressive graft dysfunction and graft loss occur in the majority of recipients. We diagnosed BKVIN in 21 recipients grafted between 1998 and 2004. Eight of 21 patients were treated with weekly, adjuvant low-dose cidofovir in addition to reduction of immunosuppressive therapy. BKVIN caused irreversible deterioration of graft function in all patients but renal function stabilized after antiviral treatment (creatinine clearance: 51.8-32 mL/min; p=0.001) and no graft loss occurred in cidofovir-treated recipients during 24.8 (8-41) months follow-up. Peak serum cidofovir concentrations were dose-dependent and attained approximately one-tenth of thein vitroEC50 for cidofovir against BK-virus, while pre-treatment with probenecid did not alter peak serum concentrations nor affected the incidence of nephrotoxicity. In fact, no cidofovir-related renal toxicity occurred; few patients had minor transient side effects (nausea, skin rash). In contrast, 9 of 13 patient who received no adjuvant cidofovir therapy lost their graft after median 8 (4-40) months. In this selected group of recipients with BKVIN, the use of adjuvant low-dose cidofovir therapy resulted in prolonged graft survival and stabilized graft function.     

The Banff 2009 Working Proposal for Polyomavirus Nephropathy: A Critical Evaluation of Its Utility as a Determinant of Clinical Outcome

Clinical outcome in BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) was examined in relation to clinical and histologic parameters with reference to the Banff Working Proposal 2009, which emphasizes tubular injury and viral load. Seventy one patients were evaluated in three eras: (i) Era‐I: No BKV PCR performed (n = 36), (ii) Era‐II: PCR performed for rising creatinine (n = 24) and (iii) Era III: PCR performed for routine screening (n = 11). Six of seventy‐one (8.4%) patients were classified as Class A, 46/71 (64.8%) as Class B and 19/71 (26.8%) as Class C. Banff class A never occurred in Era‐I. It is a heterogeneous class that includes biopsies with inflammation that have hitherto been included in Class B. Higher inflammation, but not tubular injury, nor histologic viral load correlated with worse creatinine at 3 months. On long‐term follow‐up, class C associated with graft loss (hazard ratio 2.45, p = 0.03). Clearance of viremia was associated with better graft survival at 5 years (46.0% vs. 25.0%). Viruria clearance was infrequent (15.6%). In conclusion, the clinical utility of the Banff Working Proposal 2009 derives from scoring of fibrosis and not extent of tubular injury or viral cytopathic effect. The proposal is not superior to existing schemas that include assessment of inflammation, which is a well‐known prognostic marker in other renal allograft diseases.