Clinical experience with nevirapine combined with tenofovir plus emtricitabine or lamivudine-containing regimens in HIV-infected subjects

We retrospectively evaluated the durability and reasons for discontinuation of nevirapine (NVP) in combination with a tenofovir (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) or lamivudine (3TC)-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen in an Australian outpatient setting. Between January 2003 and June 2009, 64 patients (29 na?ve and 35 treatment-experienced) received NVP/TDF-based regimens. The median exposure was 13.0 months (interquartile range [IQR] 6.0-20.0 months). The two- and three-year probability of continuing a NVP/TDF with FTC or 3TC regimen was 76% and 70%, respectively. Thirteen (20.3%) patients discontinued their regimen during the observation period. Reasons for discontinuation included virological failure in four (6.3%), rash in three (4.7%), lost to follow-up in three (4.7%), liver toxicity in two (3.1%) and HIV-1-related encephalopathy in one (1.6%). Long-term follow-up with a NVP/TDF-based regimen showed a low rate of discontinuation and enabled physicians to extend the use of ART over a long period, often with simplified (once-daily) regimens.     

Comparative Effectiveness of First Antiretroviral Regimens in Clinical Practice Using a Causal Approach

The objective of this study was to estimate the cumulative incidences of failure by months 12 (M12) and 24 (M24) for the most prescribed first-line anti-retroviral regimens (ART).It is retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database.All patients who initiated their first ART with the most prescribed regimens between 1st January 2004 and 30th June 2013 in 12 large HIV reference centers in France were included. The outcome was treatment failure—defined by any treatment modification for virological or tolerability reasons—and comparisons between regimens were carried out at M12 and M24. Adjusted and weighted methods via the propensity score (PS) were used to compare the effectiveness of the first antiretroviral regimens. Potential confounders of the treatment-outcome association were used to estimate PS with multinomial logistic regression.Overall, 3128 and 2690 patients were included in the M12 and M24 analyses, respectively. Patients received 5 different regimens (ABC/3TC with ATV/r or DRV/r, TDF/FTC with ATV/r, DRV/r, or EFV). Failure was reported in 25% and 42% at M12 and M24, respectively. Patients who received TDF/FTC/EFV had a significantly higher proportion of failure at M12 by comparison with TDF/FTC with DRV/r (reference), but not at M24. Patients in the 3 other groups had a trend toward a higher proportion of failure at M12 although not statistically significant. No difference was found at M24.Using data from a large prospective cohort, we found that boosted atazanavir and darunavir had comparable effectiveness, whatever the associated NRTIs, whereas efavirenz-based regimens were relatively less performing on the short term.     

Patient-reported outcomes in the single-tablet regimen (STaR) trial of rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in antiretroviral treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 through 48 weeks of treatment

This 96-week, randomized, open-label study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of two single-tablet regimens in treatment naïve HIV-1-infected adults: rilpivirine (RPV) + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) and efavirenz (EFV) + FTC/TDF. Assessments included patient-reported Medication Adherence Self-Report Inventory, SF-12v2 Quality of Life assessment, HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, and HIV Symptom Index Questionnaire through Week 48. Additional evaluations included study drug discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). A total of 786 participants (n=394 RPV/FTC/TDF, n=392 EFV/FTC/TDF) were included. Fewer RPV/FTC/TDF-treated than EFV/FTC/TDF-treated participants discontinued study drug due to TEAEs (2.5% vs. 8.7%), with 41% (14/34) TEAE-related discontinuations in the EFV/FTC/TDF group occurring within the first four weeks of treatment. Treatment adherence and satisfaction remained high through Week 48 and quality of life improved from baseline in both groups. There were no significant between-group differences in virologic success (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) regardless of adherence (<95% or ≥95%). Significant between-group differences favouring RPV/FTC/TDF were observed for the HIV SIQ symptoms of difficulty falling or staying asleep (p = .022) and diarrhea or loose bowel movements (p = .002). In conclusion, 48-week treatment with RPV/FTC/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF was associated with high adherence, high treatment satisfaction, and improved quality of life. TEAE-related discontinuations and patient-reported symptoms indicate that RPV/FTC/TDF may be somewhat better tolerated than EFV/FTC/TDF.     

Early virologic failure in HIV-1 infected subjects on didanosine/tenofovir/efavirenz: 12-week results from a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of two once-daily antiretroviral regimens containing lamivudine (3TC) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), each administered with didanosine (ddI) and efavirenz (EFV) as initial therapy to HIV-1-infected subjects. METHODS: Single centre, randomized (1: 1), open-label study in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected adults. Subjects commenced either 3TC/ddI/EFV (3TC group) or TDF/ddI/EFV (TDF group). Safety, Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMScap) and plasma EFV concentration monitoring was performed over the study period. Comparisons between groups were assessed using chi test and linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between EFV concentrations and virological response. RESULTS: Seventy-seven subjects were enrolled prior to recruitment being suspended, 36 to the 3TC group and 41 to the TDF group. Intention-to-treat analysis in which last observation carried forward (LOCF) found the mean viral log10 load [95% confidence interval (CI)] at weeks 4 and 12 to be 2.67 (2.47-2.87) and 1.83 (1.74-1.92) for the 3TC group and 2.75 (2.45-3.05) and 2.28 (1.96-2.6) for the TDF group (P = 0.013). Emergence of resistance occurred in five of 41 (12.2%) subjects in the TDF group up to week 12 compared with none of 36 in the 3TC group, (P < 0.05); these five subjects shared similar baseline characteristics (CD4+ cell counts < 200 x 10 cells/l and HIV-1 RNA > 100,000 copies/ml). Despite MEMScap monitoring showing > 99% adherence in all subjects, among the five failures, three had low EFV concentrations. CONCLUSION: TDF/ddI/EFV as initial therapy appears to have diminished efficacy in subjects with CD4 < 200 x 10 cells/l and viral load > 100,000 copies/ml. Treatment failure with resistance was not attributable to baseline resistance, efavirenz exposure or poor adherence.     

Patient-reported symptoms on the antiretroviral regimen efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir

Most patients (80-90%) newly diagnosed with HIV are started on the antiretroviral regimen efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir (EFV/FTC/TDF). Existing studies of patient tolerability, however, are limited. We compared symptom experiences of patients on EFV/FTC/TDF, and the subsequent impact on health-related quality of life, with those of patients on other combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the Veterans Aging Cohort Study from February 2008 to August 2009 to compare the symptom experiences of patients on EFV/FTC/TDF vs. other cART, unadjusted and then adjusted for treatment characteristics, and comorbid disease severity. We then assessed the association between EFV/FTC/TDF use and health-related quality of life. Among the 1,759 patients in our analytic sample, EFV/FTC/TDF use was associated with fewer symptoms than was other cART. The use of EFV/FTC/TDF was independently associated with health-related quality of life, and this association was at least partially explained by symptom burden.     

Effect modification by sex and baseline CD4+ cell count among adults receiving combination antiretroviral therapy in Botswana: results from a clinical trial

The Tshepo study was the first clinical trial to evaluate outcomes of adults receiving nevirapine (NVP)-based versus efavirenz (EFV)-based combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in Botswana. This was a 3 year study (n=650) comparing the efficacy and tolerability of various first-line cART regimens, stratified by baseline CD4(+): <200 (low) vs. 201-350 (high). Using targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE), we retrospectively evaluated the causal effect of assigned NNRTI on time to virologic failure or death [intent-to-treat (ITT)] and time to minimum of virologic failure, death, or treatment modifying toxicity [time to loss of virological response (TLOVR)] by sex and baseline CD4(+). Sex did significantly modify the effect of EFV versus NVP for both the ITT and TLOVR outcomes with risk differences in the probability of survival of males versus the females of approximately 6% (p=0.015) and 12% (p=0.001), respectively. Baseline CD4(+) also modified the effect of EFV versus NVP for the TLOVR outcome, with a mean difference in survival probability of approximately 12% (p=0.023) in the high versus low CD4(+) cell count group. TMLE appears to be an efficient technique that allows for the clinically meaningful delineation and interpretation of the causal effect of NNRTI treatment and effect modification by sex and baseline CD4(+) cell count strata in this study. EFV-treated women and NVP-treated men had more favorable cART outcomes. In addition, adults initiating EFV-based cART at higher baseline CD4(+) cell count values had more favorable outcomes compared to those initiating NVP-based cART.     

The reverse transcriptase 67N 70R 215Y genotype is the predominant TAM pathway associated with virologic failure among HIV type 1C-infected adults treated with ZDV/ddI-containing HAART in southern Africa

HIV-1C has become the dominant HIV-1 subtype in the global AIDS epidemic. Historically, the evolution of drug-resistant mutations was characterized primarily among antiretroviral (ARV)-treated HIV-1B infections. Whereas the non-B viruses are susceptible to the currently used ARVs, some differences between HIV-1 subtypes in response to ARV regimens have been reported. We analyzed the profile of ARV-associated mutations in HIV-1C infection treated with ZDV/ddI-containing regimens in an open-label, randomized 3 x 2 x 2 factorial study comparing ZDV/3TC vs. ZDV/ddI vs. d4T/3TC and EFV vs. NVP regimens in drug-naive adults in Botswana. The overall rate of virologic failure in the ZDV/ddI-containing arms was 14%. We addressed the development of NRTI-associated mutations in 23 virologically failed patients in the ZDV/ddI-containing arms. The 67N 70R 215Y genotype with wild-type amino acids at codon positions 41 and 210 was a dominant pattern of NRTI-associated mutations at the time of virologic failure. The mutation T215Y was the first step in the evolution of the 67N 70R 215Y genotype and was followed by mutations K70R and D67N. Representing a mixture of TAM-1 (41L/210W/215Y) and TAM-2 (67N/70R/215F /219Q) pathways, the 67N 70R 215Y genotype with wild-type amino acids at codon positions 41, 210, and 219 is a unique TAM pathway that is rarely seen in HIV-1B infection. Although limited by relatively small numbers, our data suggest that the 67N 70R 215Y genotype may be the HIV-1C-specific response to the first-line ZDV/ddI-containing regimen at the time of virologic failure. The presence of the 67N 70R 215Y genotype with wild-type amino acids at codon positions 41, 210, and 219 in HIV-1C infection suggests that the evolution of ARV-associated mutations and TAM pathways might be unique in non-B HIV-1 subtypes treated with particular ARV regimens.     

Emergent HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations Were Not Present at Low-Frequency at Baseline in Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor-Treated Subjects in the STaR Study

At Week 96 of the Single-Tablet Regimen (STaR) study, more treatment-naïve subjects that received rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (RPV/FTC/TDF) developed resistance mutations compared to those treated with efavirenz (EFV)/FTC/TDF by population sequencing. Furthermore, more RPV/FTC/TDF-treated subjects with baseline HIV-1 RNA >100,000 copies/mL developed resistance compared to subjects with baseline HIV-1 RNA ≤100,000 copies/mL. Here, deep sequencing was utilized to assess the presence of pre-existing low-frequency variants in subjects with and without resistance development in the STaR study. Deep sequencing (Illumina MiSeq) was performed on baseline and virologic failure samples for all subjects analyzed for resistance by population sequencing during the clinical study (n = 33), as well as baseline samples from control subjects with virologic response (n = 118). Primary NRTI or NNRTI drug resistance mutations present at low frequency (≥2% to 20%) were detected in 6.6% of baseline samples by deep sequencing, all of which occurred in control subjects. Deep sequencing results were generally consistent with population sequencing but detected additional primary NNRTI and NRTI resistance mutations at virologic failure in seven samples. HIV-1 drug resistance mutations emerging while on RPV/FTC/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF treatment were not present at low frequency at baseline in the STaR study.     

不同的抗病毒治疗方案对HIV／AIDS病人治疗48周后估计肾小球滤过率的影响

目的比较国内目前抗艾滋病病毒（HIV）治疗方案,对HIV感染者／艾滋病（AIDS）病人（HIV／AIDS病人）估计肾小球滤过率（eGFR）的影响。方法2011年3月至2013年3月就诊于北京地坛医院感染一科、初治为接受一线抗病毒治疗方案的HIV／AIDS病人,以及一线治疗失败更换为二线方案的HIV／AIDS病人,收集他们治疗48周的临床资料,分析不同抗病毒治疗方案对HIV／AIDS病人估计肾小球滤过率的影响。结果共收治96名病人,其中初治接受齐多夫定（AZT）＋拉米夫定（3TC）＋奈韦拉平（NVP）治疗的病人30例,初治接受替诺福韦（TDF）＋3TC＋依非韦伦（EFV）的病人46例,一线治疗失败更换为TDF＋3TC＋克力芝（LPV／r）的病人20例。三组病人治疗48周后,血肌酐水平差异无统计学意义（P=0．264）,eGFR平均水平差异无统计学意义（P=0．683）。与基线相比,一线治疗失败后更换为TDF＋3TC＋LPV／r方案的病人治疗48周后,eGFR平均水平差异无统计学意义（P=0．077）,但eGFR平均水平与基线相比下降程度明显,为-14．12ml／min／1．73m2。结论三组不同抗病毒治疗方案的病人,均没有发现明显的eGFR的变化,可能需要对HIV／AIDS病人进行长期的肾脏功能指标的监测。     

Long-term efficacy and tolerance of efavirenz- and nevirapine-containing regimens in adult HIV type 1 Senegalese patients

Owing to their low toxicity, low price, and ease of use, efavirenz (EFV) and nevirapine (NVP) are frequently used as part of antiretroviral regimens for AIDS treatment. Several clinical trials have already studied their efficacy and tolerance. However, long-term observations of the effects of these drugs in patients are limited. We used data from a prospective Senegalese cohort to analyze long-term tolerance and efficacy of these two drugs in a low-resources setting. Patients were included if they started their therapy with EFV or NVP. They were censored after treatment discontinuation. The primary endpoint was the time to treatment discontinuation. Secondary endpoints included time to death, time to disease progression, occurrence of severe adverse effects, CD4 cell recovery, and virological response. Confounding factors were controlled using marginal structural models. The median follow-up time in both EFV and NVP arms was 48 months. The hazard ratio (HR) of drug discontinuation in the EFV arm vs. the NVP arm was 0.84 (0.34; 1.87). There was a borderline difference in virological response [HR 1.38 (0.999; 1.89)] but no differences in time to death [HR 1.15 (0.41; 3.24)], time to AIDS progression [HR 1.25 (0.61; 2.58)], or time to increase in CD4 cell count above 500 cells/mm3. Adverse effects were different between NVP and EFV, but long-term tolerance was good for both. This analysis provided further information on long-term tolerance and efficacy of EFV and NVP in a resource-limited setting.     

Nevirapine- versus efavirenz-based highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens in antiretroviral-naïve patients with advanced HIV infection

Objective

To compare virological and immunological responses to nevirapine (NVP)‐based and efavirenz (EFV)‐based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens in antiretroviral‐naïve patients with advanced HIV infection.

Methods

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on antiretroviral‐naïve HIV‐infected patients whose pretreatment CD4 cell counts were less than 100 cells/μL or whose viral loads were greater than 100 000 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL.

Results

Baseline characteristics of patients in the NVP (n=24) and EFV (n=29) groups were not different. The proportion of patients with viral loads >100 000 copies/mL was higher in the EFV group. The probability of virological success estimated by the Kaplan‐Meier method showed that 3‐ and 6‐month success rates were 30.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.7–52.2%] and 63.1% (95% CI: 44.7–81.3%) for the NVP group. The corresponding values were 41.2% (95% CI: 25.8–61.0%) and 62.9% (95% CI: 45.7–80.1%) for the EFV‐based group. The median success times of the two groups were about 4 and 3 months (P=0.678), respectively, for NVP and EFV. Cox's proportional hazard was used after adjusting for age, previous opportunistic infections (OIs), and viral load at baseline, and showed that patients who received the NVP‐based regimen had about 25% [hazard ratio (HR)=0.75, 95% CI: 0.37–1.51] less chance of virological success than patients who received the EFV‐based regimen (P=0.415). The median times to CD4≥100 cells/μL were 5.6 and 4.4 months for the NVP‐ and EFV‐based regimens, respectively (log‐rank test, P=0.144).

Conclusions

NVP‐ and EFV‐based HAART regimens as initial regimens in patients with advanced HIV infection are effective and comparable, in term of virological and immunological responses. However, further large‐scale randomized controlled clinical trials in this group of patients with advanced HIV infection are needed.

     

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), emtricitabine/TDF, and entecavir in patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis B liver disease

Data are limited on the safety and effectiveness of oral antivirals other than lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil for treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in patients with decompensated liver disease. This Phase 2, double-blind study randomized 112 patients with CHB and decompensated liver disease to receive either tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF; n = 45), emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF (fixed-dose combination; n = 45), or entecavir (ETV; n = 22). The primary endpoint was safety; more specifically, tolerability failure (adverse events resulting in permanent treatment discontinuation) and confirmed serum creatinine increase ≥ 0.5 mg/dL from baseline or confirmed serum phosphorus <2 mg/dL. Patients with insufficient viral suppression (e.g., confirmed HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at week 8 or 24) could begin open-label FTC/TDF but were considered failures in this interim week 48 analysis for efficacy endpoints. Tolerability failure was infrequent across arms: 6.7% TDF, 4.4% FTC/TDF, and 9.1% ETV (P = 0.622) as were confirmed renal parameters meeting threshold 8.9%, 6.7%, and 4.5% (P = 1.000), respectively. Six patients died (none considered related to study drug) and six received liver transplants (none had HBV recurrence). The adverse event and laboratory profiles were consistent with advanced liver disease and complications, with no unexpected safety signals. At week 48, HBV DNA was <400 copies/mL (69 IU/mL) in 70.5% (TDF), 87.8% (FTC/TDF), and 72.7% (ETV) of patients. Proportions with normal alanine aminotransferase were: 57% (TDF), 76% (FTC/TDF), and 55% (ETV). Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss/seroconversion occurred in 21%/21% (TDF), 27%/13% (FTC/TDF), and 0%/0% (ETV). Child-Turcotte-Pugh and Modification for End-stage Liver Disease scores improved in all groups. CONCLUSION: All treatments were well tolerated in patients with decompensated liver disease due to CHB with improvement in virologic, biochemical, and clinical parameters.     

3组常用一线抗HIV药物疗效观察

目的通过动态临床试验分析,对广西地区目前常用的AZT、d4T及TDF为主的3组抗反转录病毒治疗方案进行临床疗效比较。方法收治HIV/AIDS患者76例,分为3组,AZT组接受AZT+3TC+EFV治疗,d4T组接受d4T+3TC+EFV治疗,TDF组接受TDF+3TC+EFV治疗。对3组30个月内新发机会性感染率、免疫重建效果、病毒学应答效果、主要生化指标变化、换药及耐药情况进行动态分析比较。结果 3组患者经治疗满6个月时HIV RNA载量显著下降(P均0.05),CD4+T淋巴细胞计数显著上升(P均0.05),但是3组间差异无统计学意义;6个月以后各组CD4+T淋巴细胞计数上升缓慢,12个月和18个月时,d4T组CD4+T淋巴细胞计数上升幅度均大于AZT组和TDF组(P均0.05);3组患者治疗满6个月ALB显著升高(P均0.05),而后各阶段变化不大;AZT组、d4T组、TDF组随访期间新发机会性感染发生率分别为15.62%、11.53%、27.77%,不良反应换药率分别为12.50%、30.80%、16.67%,但差异均无统计学意义。结论广西地区3组常用一线抗HIV药物方案的治疗效果显著且相似,但d4T方案因药物不良反应和耐药而换药的发生率较高,应考虑停用。     

广西16例患AIDS儿童抗病毒治疗病毒学失败者的基因型耐药性研究

目的了解广西自治区患艾滋病（AIDS）儿童抗病毒治疗病毒学失败病例的耐药规律及特点。方法分析16例患AIDS儿童接受过高效抗反转录病毒治疗（HAART）,并出现病毒学失败的临床及实验室资料,进行基因型耐药检测并对耐药突变结果进行分析。结果 16例患AIDS儿童的平均年龄（3.4±1.6）岁,平均治疗的时间为（13.2±5.5）个月,平均CD4T淋巴细胞百分比（11.08±7.05）%个,病毒载量的平均值（4.02±0.58）log10 IU/ml。在16例儿童中,基因型耐药检测结果为耐药的有15例,病毒学失败后耐药发生率为93.75%。在15例耐药的儿童中,7例（占46.67%）对非核苷类反转录酶抑制剂（NNRTI）的三种药物全部高度耐药,15例（占100%）对NVP耐药;10例（占66.67%）对DLV高度耐药,1例（占6.67%）为可能耐药;7例（46.67%）对EFV高度耐药,8例（占53.33%）为可能耐药。在15例耐药的儿童中,对核苷类反转录酶抑制剂（NRTI）的耐药突变结果显示：13例（占86.67%）对3TC和FTC高度耐药,1例对AZT高度耐药;1例对ddI高度耐药,1例为可能耐药;1例对d4T高度耐药,2例为可能耐药;1例对ABC高度耐药,2例为可能耐药;1例对TDF高度耐药,1例为可能耐药。结论 15例病毒学失败的艾滋病患儿,对正在使用的抗病毒药有不同程度耐药,需考虑更换新的抗病毒治疗方案。     

Unexpected CD4 cell count decline in patients receiving didanosine and tenofovir-based regimens despite undetectable viral load

BACKGROUND: We recently observed a significant CD4 cell count decline in patients receiving didanosine (ddI) 400 mg, tenofovir (TDF) and nevirapine (NVP), despite virological suppression. METHODS: We identified from our computerized patient database subjects who initiated combinations containing ddI and/or TDF for reasons other than virological failure, including simplification or intolerance. Changes in total, CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte counts since the initiation of therapy were analysed retrospectively. Plasma concentration of ddI was prospectively determined in eight of these patients receiving ddI 400 mg + TDF + NVP and 3 weeks after a ddI dosage reduction. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients were studied. A significant decrease in CD4 and CD8 and in total lymphocyte counts was only seen in subjects receiving ddI standard dose + TDF-containing regimens, despite the maintenance of viral suppression. More than 50% of these patients showed a decline of more than 100 CD4 cells at 48 weeks. In contrast, subjects not receiving ddI + TDF together experienced the expected progressive increase in CD4 T-cell counts. Plasma levels of ddI were elevated in all patients receiving the standard ddI dose + TDF. DdI plasma levels significantly decreased when patients weighting > 60 kg reduced ddI dose to 250 mg, achieving similar levels to those generated by ddI 400 mg without TDF. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of ddI at standard doses plus TDF appears to exert a deleterious effect on CD4 and CD8 counts. Although lymphocyte toxicity related to excessive ddI plasma levels could explain our findings, other mechanisms cannot be excluded. Pharmacokinetic data suggest ddI dose reduction when coadministered with TDF.