Aids to successful shoulder arthrography performed with a fluoroscopically guided anterior approach.

One method for performing effective shoulder arthrography with a fluoroscopically guided anterior approach is described. The technique can ensure success while injury to the cartilaginous labrum is avoided, which is essential when arthrography is performed in conjunction with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The key features of the technique include supine positioning of the patient with the shoulder in external rotation, marking the skin just lateral to the humeral head cortex, inserting the needle perpendicular to the fluoroscopy beam, testing the injection with an anesthetic agent, and confirming intraarticular needle placement with iodinated contrast material. The procedure can be followed by an injection of dilute gadolinium solution for subsequent MR imaging. Proper patient and needle positioning as well as accurate confirmation of intraarticular needle placement are critical to a successful and atraumatic shoulder arthrographic examination.     

MR-Arthrographie des Sprunggelenkes

Due to its superior soft tissue contrast conventional MRI is the imaging method of choice in the evaluation of ankle joint disorders. Conventional MR imaging can accurately demonstrate normal or acutely injured ligaments; however, in subacute and chronic injury joint fluid necessary for delineation of injured ligaments is absent and MR arthrography should be performed. MR arthrography uses the intraarticular injection of contrast material to distend the joint, yielding improved discrimination of intraarticular structures. This joint distension with MR arthrography is also helpful in the staging of osteochondritis dissecans, since in cases of unstable lesions tracking of contrast material into the interface can be more easily demonstrated. Finally, high contrast and joint distension by MR arthrography improves the detection of intraarticular loose bodies, which often require surgery. MR arthrography, although invasive, may provide additional information in various ankle joint disorders.     

Multidetector spiral CT arthrography of the shoulder. Clinical applications and limits, with MR arthrography and arthroscopic correlations

Although MR imaging and MR arthrography are the first choice modalities for shoulder imaging, CT arthrography (CTA) may be used successfully to address many clinical questions. The advent of submillimeter multiple detector CT technology and subsequent excellent three-plane resolution has considerably increased the quality of CTA examinations and has propelled this technique to the forefront in a growing number of indications. The combined use of iodinated contrast material for fluoroscopic confirmation of the articular position of the needle before injection of gadolinium chelates for MR arthrography offers the unique opportunity to compare CTA and MRA findings in carefully selected cases. This paper illustrates capabilities and limits of CTA for the study of rotator cuff tears, shoulder instability, cartilage lesions, anatomical variants and abnormalities of the glenoid labrum, with correlations to MR arthrography and surgical findings.     

MR arthrography: anatomic-pathologic investigation

To enhance the efficacy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating articular soft-tissue structures, arthrography was performed before imaging 45 fresh cadaveric specimens. Contrast agents used were gadolinium-DTPA, 0.9% saline, diatrizoate, and air. MR imaging was performed with and without intraarticular contrast material, and specimens were subsequently sectioned in the same plane. Gd-DTPA was the most effective agent. Saline and diatrizoate exhibited equivalent signal behavior and necessitated T2-weighted sequences, while air was not useful. Depiction of normal anatomy was enhanced with MR arthrography. After surgical creation of lesions in selected specimens, subtle tears were delineated exclusively with MR arthrography, and major tears were diagnosed more confidently. Intraarticular contrast material may enhance the diagnostic capabilities of MR imaging in the setting of joint disease.     

An overview of MR arthrography with emphasis on the current technique and applicational hints and tips

Magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography has been investigated in every major peripheral joint of the body, and has been proven to be effective in determining the integrity of intraarticular ligamentous and fibrocartilaginous structures and in the detection or assessment of osteochondral lesions and loose bodies in selected cases. Several methods could be used to create arthrogram effect during MR imaging, however, direct MR arthrography using diluted gadolinium as the contrast agent is the most commonly used technique and is the most reliable of all. MR arthrography is useful for demonstrating labrocapsular-ligamentous abnormalities and distinguishing partial thickness rotator cuff tears from focal full thickness tears in the shoulder, identifying or excluding recurrent tears following meniscal operations in the knee, demonstrating perforations of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and ligaments in the wrist, showing labral tears in the hip, diagnosing ligament tears in the ankle and identifying osteochondral lesions or loose bodies in any of the aforementioned joints. In this article, an overview of techniques of MR arthrography is provided with emphasis on direct MR arthrography using diluted gadolinium as the contrast agent. The current applications of the technique in major peripheral joints are reviewed, with emphasis given to the shoulder joint where the role of this technique has become well established.     

Evaluation of the postoperative meniscus of the knee: a study comparing conventional arthrography, conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography with iodinated contrast material, and MR arthrography with gadolinium-based contrast material

Objective. To compare four imaging methods in the evaluation of the postoperative meniscus: conventional arthrography, conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography with iodinated contrast material, and MR arthrography with gadolinium-based contrast material. Design and patients. Thirty-three patients referred for knee MR examinations with a history of meniscal surgery were studied prospectively. At the first patient visit, conventional MR examination was followed by an MR arthrogram with gadolinium-based contrast material. At the second visit, a conventional arthrogram with iodinated contrast material was followed immediately by an MR examination. Imaging examinations were interpreted by a masked reader, and then compared with the results of repeat arthroscopic surgery in 12 patients. Results. The correct evaluation of the status of postoperative menisci was allowed in 12 of 13 patients (92%) by MR arthrography using gadolinium-based contrast agent, 10 of 13 patients (77%) by conventional MR examination, 9 of 12 patients (75%) by MR arthrography, and 7 of 12 patients (58%) by conventional arthrography. Conclusion. Intra-articular fluid is advantageous in the evaluation of patients with a suspected meniscal retear. MR arthrography with gadolinium-based contrast material is the most accurate imaging method for the diagnosis of meniscal retears. Received: 7 April 1999 Revision requested: 26 May 1999 Revision received: 17 June 1999 Accepted: 18 June 1999     

Indirect MR arthrography: techniques and applications

Indirect MR arthrography is a relatively new MR technique improving articular and periarticular contrast. It is achieved by injection of paramagnetic MR contrast media intravenously instead of intra-articular injection as in direct MR arthrography. After the injection exercising the joint results in considerable signal intensity increase within the joint cavity. Fat saturated MR sequences then yield arthrographic images. The method is less invasive than direct MR arthrography and first results showed comparable sensitivities and specificities for rotator cuff and glenoid labrum pathology. In this article the technique, established and potential future indications, drawbacks and limitations of the method are reviewed. Received: 26 March 1997; Revision received 31 July 1997; Accepted 1 August 1997     

MR imaging of the shoulder after surgery

This review article describes postoperative MR findings relating to surgery in shoulder impingement syndrome, including rotator cuff lesions, shoulder instability, and arthroplasty. Potentially misleading postoperative findings are emphasized. Because standard MR imaging may not always be the method of choice for post operative imaging, alternative imaging techniques have been included (MR arthrography, CT arthrography, and sonography).     

Indirect MR arthrography: concepts and controversies

Indirect MR arthrography involves intravenous injection of a standard dose of Gadolinium contrast followed, in delayed fashion, by MR imaging. Contrast in taken up by the joint at a rate dependent on a variety of factors including synovial area, vascularity, permeability, and pre-existing joint effusion. Patient acceptance is higher than with direct intra-articular injection, and logical considerations (e.g., not needing a radiologist present) make this an attractive alternative to direct MR arthrography. At best, an indirect MR arthrography exam can look virtually identical to a direct MR arthrogram. However, the radiologist should be aware that vascular tissue inside and outside the joint will enhance, which may be considered either an advantage or disadvantage. Additionally, since all compartments of the joint enhance, information regarding abnormal communication of contrast material is absent. Suboptimal exams occur due to the need for diffusion of contrast into the joint. Exercise can help improve the quality of exams. Using an adequate time delay is essential for optimizing indirect MR arthrography.     

MR and CT arthrography of the shoulder

The combined use of shoulder arthrography with MR and CT imaging offers distinct advantages over conventional nonarthrographic imaging techniques. The improved contrast and joint distension afforded by direct arthrography optimize evaluation of various intra-articular structures and help to define subtle abnormalities and distinguish normal variants from true shoulder pathology. In this article, we review the rationale and basic approaches to shoulder arthrography as well as the imaging appearance of the normal shoulder, anatomical variants, and pathology highlighted by this technique.     

Is a mixture of gadolinium and iodinated contrast material safe during MR arthrography?

OBJECTIVE. This study was designed to determine whether a mixture of iodinated contrast material and gadopentetate dimeglumine used during MR arthrography yields free gadolinium ion, a systemically toxic metal. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Mixtures of commercially available nonionic and ionic iodinated contrast agent, gadopentetate dimeglumine, lidocaine, and epinephrine were analyzed using a spectrophotometric titration with a gadolinium ion titrant and methyl thymol blue indicator. RESULTS. We found no significant dissociation of gadolinium ion when gadopentetate dimeglumine was mixed with iodinated contrast agents, lidocaine, or epinephrine in any of the dilutions tested. CONCLUSION. Gadopentetate dimeglumine and iodinated contrast material can be mixed before MR imaging without any release of free gadolinium and are therefore safe for confirming the intraarticular placement of contrast material before MR arthrography.     

Ultrasound-guided injection for MR arthrography of the hip: comparison of two different techniques

Objective

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the two different ultrasound-guided injection techniques for MR arthrography of the hip.

Materials and methods

Fifty-nine consecutive patients (21 men, 38 women) referred for MR arthrographies of the hip were prospectively included in the study. Three patients underwent bilateral MR arthrography. The two injection techniques were quantitatively and qualitatively compared. Quantitative analysis was performed by the comparison of injected contrast material volume into the hip joint. Qualitative analysis was performed with regard to extraarticular leakage of contrast material into the soft tissues. Extraarticular leakage of contrast material was graded as none, minimal, moderate, or severe according to the MR images. Each patient rated discomfort after the procedure using a visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results

The injected contrast material volume was less in femoral head puncture technique (mean 8.9?±?3.4?ml) when compared to femoral neck puncture technique (mean 11.2?±?2.9?ml) (p?<?0.05). The chi-squared test showed significantly more contrast leakage by femoral head puncture technique (p?<?0.05). Statistical analysis showed no difference between the head and neck puncture groups in terms of feeling of pain (p?=?0.744) or in the body mass index (p?=?0.658) of the patients.

Conclusion

The femoral neck injection technique provides high intraarticular contrast volume and produces less extraarticular contrast leakage than the femoral head injection technique when US guidance is used for MR arthrography of the hip.     

K-edge digital subtraction arthrography of the painful hip prosthesis: a feasibility study

K-edge energy subtraction radiography is a method for detecting the presence of iodinated contrast material by subtracting two digital radiographs produced by X-ray beams with energies above and below the iodine K edge. We performed a feasibility study on the application of K-edge energy digital subtraction arthrography (KEDSA) to painful hip prostheses. During arthrography, loosening of the prosthesis is implied if contrast material is seen dissecting around the prosthesis, an often difficult detection task because of adjacent prosthesis metal or cement. In conventional arthrography a preliminary mask image is thus used from which films obtained after injection of iodinated contrast material are subtracted. Movement by the patient during this process may preclude subsequent subtraction. With KEDSA, since multiple image pairs may be obtained after the injection of contrast material, the problem of patient motion is virtually eliminated. A conventional X-ray tube operating between 55 and 65 kVp was alternately filtered by iodine and cerium filters to produce the KEDSA images. The apparatus was capable of producing a subtracted image within 3 sec. The technique was applied to phantoms and to six patients immediately after hip arthrography that had been positive for prosthesis loosening. Although of lower spatial resolution, the KEDSA images were, in all cases, positive for loosening in a pattern consistent with the conventional arthrographic images. KEDSA was shown to be successful in detecting extraarticular contrast material. During a single study, subtraction in various imaging planes as well as postexercise subtraction imaging can be accomplished-techniques not heretofore possible in routine subtraction arthrography.     

Comparison of conventional and computed arthrotomography with MR imaging in the evaluation of the shoulder

To compare conventional arthrography and computed arthrotomography (CAT) with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the evaluation of the shoulder, we studied 18 patients who underwent conventional double contrast arthrography and CAT, and T1-, balanced, and T2-weighted MR imaging. The arthrograms were independently reviewed by two of the authors and the MR images were independently reviewed by three other authors in a systematic fashion with the aid of a prewritten evaluation form. The findings were compared among reviewers and between imaging methods. We found MR comparable to conventional arthrography in the evaluation of the rotator cuff; however, MR also enabled evaluation of tendonitis, which could not be accomplished with conventional arthrography. Because of MR's superior soft tissue imaging capability, we were able to stage the impingement syndrome. Magnetic resonance also allowed evaluation of the glenoid labrum and capsuloligamentous structures and assessment of instability in a fashion similar to CAT. In most cases, information obtained from MR equaled or exceeded that obtained from conventional arthrography and CAT. With refinement in technique and increased experience, we believe that MR may replace arthrography in the evaluation of the shoulder.     

Indirect MR arthrography of the shoulder in detection of rotator cuff ruptures

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of indirect MR arthrography images obtained following intravenous contrast injection and conventional MR imaging in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. Twenty-four patients with clinically suspected rotator cuff disease were examined. Conventional MR images and post-contrast indirect MR arthrography images were obtained. All images were evaluated in a blinded fashion by two musculoskeletal radiologist. Results were than analyzed depending on surgical output. The correlation coefficient (Spearman rank correlation test) and the kappa values for agreement between surgery and imaging techniques were calculated. The correlation coefficients between indirect MR arthrography and surgery for reader 1 and reader 2 were 0.9137 and 0.9773, respectively. Whereas the agreement between conventional MR imaging and surgery was moderate (ϰ = 0.383–0.571), the agreement between indirect MR arthrography and surgery was excellent (ϰ = 0.873–0.936). We suggest the use of indirect MR arthrography technique when conventional MR images are equivocal in diagnosis of rotator cuff disease. Received: 12 April 2000/Revised: 22 May 2000/Accepted: 23 May 2000     

Is MR better than arthrography for evaluating the ligaments of the wrist? In vitro study

The purpose of this study was to determine the relative merits of MR imaging and three-compartment digital arthrography in the assessment of carpal ligaments in vitro. We performed MR imaging and arthrography in 10 normal wrists of fresh cadavers ranging in age from 48 to 71 years, and compared the appearance of the interosseous ligaments and triangular fibrocartilage complex with findings on anatomic sections of the joints. In six of the specimens, relatively T1-weighted MR images, 800/20 (TR/TE), preceded three-compartment digital arthrography performed with standard contrast material. In the other four specimens, arthrography, using an MR solution of iodinated contrast material mixed with cupric sulfate and gelatin, was performed before MR imaging. This was done to mimic the intraarticular fluid that might be seen in an injured wrist. MR allowed accurate assessment of the triangular fibrocartilage complex and scapholunate ligament in eight of 10 cases. Consistent MR visualization of the lunotriquetral ligament was difficult. Three-compartment digital arthrography allowed accurate assessment of the triangular fibrocartilage complex and scapholunate and lunotriquetral ligaments in all 10 cases. We concluded that MR is useful but inferior to arthrography in the evaluation of interosseous ligaments and the triangular fibrocartilage complex.     

Patient's assessment of discomfort during MR arthrography of the shoulder.

PURPOSE: To assess patient discomfort during (a) intraarticular contrast material injection (arthrography) and (b) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients referred for MR arthrography of the shoulder and to compare the relative discomfort associated with each part of the examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With use of a visual analogue scale (VAS) and relative ratings, 202 consecutive patients referred for MR arthrography of the shoulder rated the expected discomfort and that actually experienced during both arthrography and MR imaging. The Student t test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The average VAS score (0 = "did not feel anything," 100 = "unbearable") was 16.1 +/- 16.4 (SD) for arthrography and 20.2 +/- 25.0 for MR imaging. This difference was statistically significant (P =.036, paired t test). The discomfort experienced during arthrography was as expected in 90 (44.6%) patients, less than expected in 110 (54.4%), and worse than expected in two (1.0%). MR imaging-related discomfort was as expected in 114 (56.4%) patients, less than expected in 66 (32.7%), and worse in 22 (10.9%). Arthrography was rated worse than MR imaging by 53 (26.2%) patients, equal to MR imaging by 69 (34.2%), and less uncomfortable than MR imaging by 80 (39.6%). CONCLUSION: Arthrography-related discomfort was well tolerated, often less severe than anticipated, and rated less severe than MR imaging-related discomfort.     

Non-contrast MR imaging of the glenohumeral joint. Part I. Normal anatomy

MR imaging of the shoulder without contrast is frequently used for evaluation of glenohumeral instability in spite of the popularity of MR arthrography. With proper imaging technique, familiarity with normal anatomy and variants as well as knowledge of the expected pathologic findings high diagnostic accuracy may be achieved.     

Diagnostic value of MR arthrography in detection of intrinsic carpal ligament lesions: use of cine-MR arthrography as a new approach

Twenty-five patients with chronic wrist pain and a preliminary diagnosis of carpal instability were examined with conventional MR imaging and MR arthrography with single compartment intra-articular injection. A new cine-MR arthrography technique, with image acquisition at every 5 s during intra-articular injection, was performed in 17 subjects. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of MR arthrography in ligamentous lesions of the wrist and to assess the value of cine-MR arthrography in comparison with arthroscopy and/or surgery. Magnetic resonance arthrography, a semi-invasive technique, increased the diagnostic accuracy of intrinsic carpal ligament injuries. Cine-MR arthrography can be considered as a promising technique especially for the evaluation of lunatotriquetral and scapholunate ligament injuries of the wrist. Received 6 December 1995; Revision received 29 November 1996; Accepted 24 February 1997     

Interosseous ligament tears of the wrist: comparison of multi-detector row CT arthrography and MR imaging

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) arthrography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in depicting tears of dorsal, central, and palmar segments of scapholunate (SL) and lunotriquetral (LT) ligaments in cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cadaver wrists were obtained and used according to institutional guidelines and with informed consent of donors prior to death. Nine cadaver wrists of eight subjects were evaluated. MR images were obtained with a 1.5-T MR unit. Imaging protocol included intermediate-weighted coronal and transverse fast spin-echo and coronal three-dimensional gradient-echo sequences. Multi-detector row CT arthrography was performed after tricompartmental injection of 3-6 mL of contrast material with a concentration of 160 mg per milliliter of iodine. Palmar, dorsal, and central segments of both ligaments were analyzed on transverse and coronal MR images and multiplanar multi-detector row CT reconstructions by two musculoskeletal radiologists working independently. Open inspection of the wrists was the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated from the imaging and gross pathologic readings. Statistical significance was calculated with the McNemar test. Weighted kappa values for interobserver agreement were calculated for both imaging modalities. RESULTS: All ligament segments could be visualized in all cases with both imaging modalities. CT arthrography was more sensitive (100%) than MR imaging (60%) in detection of palmar segment tears (P = .62); specificity of both imaging modalities was 77%. Sensitivity (CT arthrography, 86%; MR imaging, 79%) and specificity (CT arthrography, 50%; MR imaging, 25%) for detection of the central segment tears were determined. Dorsal segment tears were detected only with CT arthrography, while all tears were missed with MR imaging (P = .02). Interobserver agreement was better for multi-detector row CT arthrography (kappa = 0.37-0.78) than for MR imaging (kappa = -0.33 to -0.10). CONCLUSION: Performance in depiction of palmar and central segment tears of SL and LT ligaments is almost equal for multi-detector row CT arthrography and MR imaging, with much higher interobserver reliability for CT arthrography. CT arthrography is significantly superior to MR imaging in the detection of dorsal segment tears of SL and LT ligaments.