High-grade mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma: comparative genomic hybridization study

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) has recently been integrated into the World Health Organization classification. Although MTSCC is generally a low-grade carcinoma, MTSCC with high-grade morphology has been recently reported. We present the first case of high-grade MTSCC with comparative genomic hybridization findings. A 60-year-old Japanese man presented with weight loss and general fatigue. He underwent radical nephrectomy because of the clinical diagnosis of renal cancer. Histologic examination of renal tumor showed findings of high-grade MTSCC. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis showed gain of chromosomes 1q, 7, 16, 19q, and Y and loss of chromosomes 1p, 6p, 8p, 11q (del(11)(q23)), and 13. G-band karyotype showed gain of chromosomes 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 16, and 20 and loss of chromosome 15. Results of our molecular genetic analysis support the idea that high-grade MTSCC is a real counterpart of low-grade MTSCC. There is no evidence to designate such tumors as unclassified renal cell carcinoma.     

Clear cell changes in mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma: cytoplasmic pallor/clearing within tubules,vacuoles or hybrid conventional clear cell carcinoma of kidney?

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) is a rare and recently recognized subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Apart from the classic morphology comprising conventional three components, there exist a large number of non-classic morphological variants of MTSCC, which make it necessity to differentiate from other RCC. Herein, we report two non-classic morphological variants of MTSCC. Case 1, a 85 years old man, showed numerous vacuoles among inherent components and cytoplasmic pallor/clearing within tubules mimicking conventional clear cell RCC with a 8.5 years follow-up, while Case 2 indicated a “mucin-poor” MTSCC associated with simultaneous conventional clear cell RCC at her age of 73 years. Until now Case 1 carries the longest disease-free survival reported in literature since MTSCC was defined and ranks the oldest since reported in literature, while Case 2 is the first report of “mucin-poor” MTSCC associated with simultaneous conventional clear cell RCC. Now, since no biomarkers or imagining tools but pathological examination can confirm the diagnosis of MTSCC, the management is always following the guideline of RCC in clinical practice. Generally, most reports consider it as a good prognosis disease, but sarcomatoid variant, even classic subtype can progress rapidly to life-threatening disease.     

Metastatic renal mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma. Atypical behavior of a rare, morphologically bland tumor

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) is a rare, distinctive renal neoplasm characterized by an admixture of cuboidal cells in tubules and sheets of spindle cells, typically with low-grade nuclei and a myxoid or mucinous background. It is characteristically of low malignant potential, and only rare metastatic cases have been reported. We describe a case in which the patient presented with extensive regional and distant metastases, but both primary and metastatic tumor showed the typical histomorphology of bland cuboidal or spindle cells lacking pleomorphism, mitoses, and necrosis. Almost all previous cases of metastatic MTSCCs have shown nuclear atypia or sarcomatoid morphology of the primary tumor; and metastatic renal MTSCC in which the primary neoplasm does not display atypical features is exceptional, serving to highlight that these rare tumors can behave aggressively even with "indolent" histological appearances.     

Recent classification of renal epithelial tumors

The recent classification of renal tumors is based on genetic evidence as well as on histologic features. Malignant tumor includes clear cell renal carcinoma (RCC), multilocular cystic RCC, papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, carcinoma of the collecting duct of Bellini, renal carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocations/TFE3 gene fusions and mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma. Benign tumor is subdivided into papillary adenoma, renal oncocytoma and metanephric adenoma. Recently, new disease entities such as acquired cystic disease-associated RCC, clear cell papillary RCC and renal carcinoma with t(6;11)(p21:q12) have been discovered. In this article, we briefly review and introduce the clinical, morphological and genetic features of these tumor entities.     

Recent advances of immunohistochemistry for diagnosis of renal tumors

The recent classification of renal tumors has been proposed according to genetic characteristics as well as morphological difference. In this review, we summarize the immunohistochemical characteristics of each entity of renal tumors. Regarding translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC), TFE3, TFEB and ALK protein expression is crucial in establishing the diagnosis of Xp11.2 RCC, renal carcinoma with t(6;11)(p21;q12), and renal carcinoma with ALK rearrangement, respectively. In dialysis‐related RCC, neoplastic cells of acquired cystic disease‐associated RCC are positive for alpha‐methylacyl‐CoA racemase (AMACR), but negative for cytokeratin (CK) 7, whereas clear cell papillary RCC shows the inverse pattern. The diffuse positivity for carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9) is diagnostic for clear cell RCC. Co‐expression of CK7 and CA9 is characteristic of multilocular cystic RCC. CK7 and AMACR are excellent markers for papillary RCC and mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma. CD82 and epithelial‐related antigen (MOC31) may be helpful in the distinction between chromophobe RCC and renal oncocytoma. WT1 and CD57 highlights the diagnosis of metanephric adenoma. The combined panel of PAX2 and PAX8 may be useful in the diagnosis of metastatic RCC.     

Fine needle aspiration biopsy of renal mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma: Report of two cases

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) is a rare renal tumor. Here we report two cases of MTSCC which were initially evaluated by fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and followed by surgical resection of the tumors. The cytomorphologic features of MTSCC were characterized by aggregates of relatively uniform, predominantly oval to spindle cells intermixed with abundant metachromatic myxoid matrix. Only rare epithelioid tumor cells with vacuolated cytoplasm were present. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for CK7, CK19, CD10, vimentin, E‐cadherin, alpha‐methyl CoA racemase, and negative for CK903 and CK20. EMA and carbonic anhydrase IX immunoreactivity was seen in one of the two cases. Multiple chromosomal losses involving chromosomes 1, 2, 17 and likely chromosome 7 were revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). These cytomorphologic, immunophenotypic, and cytogenetic features were helpful for including this entity in the differential diagnosis of renal cell carcinomas. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

An immunohistochemical approach to the differential diagnosis of renal tumors

Renal neoplasms comprise several distinct clinicopathologic entities with potential prognostic and the rapeutic differences. Although careful morphologic examination using sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin will allow for the correct diagnosis in the majority of cases, there is sufficient overlap between several entities such that ancillary techniques may be necessary to arrive at the correct diagnosis. In routine diagnostic surgical pathology practice of renal tumors, immunohistochemistry is the foremost ancillary technique. Using an approach based on common histologic patterns (tumors with clear cytoplasm, granular cytoplasm, tubulopapillary architecture, spindle cell morphology, small round-cell morphology, and infiltrating poorly differentiated carcinoma), we will discuss the utility of immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis of renal neoplasms. In recent years, needle biopsies from renal masses are being increasingly performed. In these small biopsies, the entire range of cytoarchitectural features that are generally necessary to make a diagnosis may not be fully appreciated. Immunohistochemistry may be helpful in this setting to narrow the differential diagnosis or to arrive at a definitive diagnosis. Finally, the use of immunohistochemistry for the confirmation of metastatic renal cell carcinoma presenting at distant sites will be discussed. Panels of immunohistochemical stains are proposed for different settings, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC) marker, CD10, and vimentin to suggest renal origin of a metastatic tumor, and markers to aid in subclassification of RCC, including parvalbumin and c-kit for chromophobe RCC, and cytokeratin 7 and alpha-methyl-acyl-CoA racemase for papillary RCC.     

Mucin poor mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma of the kidney, with nonclassic morphologic variant of spindle cell predominance and psammomatous calcification

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) is a rare type of kidney tumor that has only been recently described. The classic MTSCCs are polymorphic renal neoplasms characterized by small, elongated tubules lined by cuboidal cells and/or cords of spindled cells separated by pale mucinous stroma. Nonclassic morphologic variants and features of MTSC have not been well studied and rarely been reported. We report a challenging case of mucin-poor MTSCC with marked spindle cell predominance and focal psammomatous calcification in a 39-year-old man and describe its histologic and immunohistochemical features. Pathologists must be aware of the histologic spectrum of MTSCCs to ensure their accurate diagnosis.     

GATA3 aids in distinguishing fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma from papillary renal cell carcinoma

GATA3 has been reported to be positive in clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity. However, its features in high-grade RCC remain unclear. Despite the emergence of novel renal entities, FH-deficient RCC remains one of the most aggressive renal neoplasms. The diagnosis is mainly based on the loss of FH at the protein level. Previous studies have shown that inclusion-like nuclei, multiple architectural patterns, FH loss, and 2SC positivity can differentiate FH-deficient RCC from other RCC. In some FH-deficient RCC cases, FH is normally expressed and is difficult to diagnose. This study included 11 FH-deficient RCC, and GATA3 showed different expression in seven cases. However, 147 papillary renal cell carcinomas were included, and GATA3 expression was negative. A comparison of clinicopathological aspects between 11 FH-deficient RCC and 30 high-grade PRCC showed statistical significance in age, size, multiple architectural patterns, inclusion-like nuclei, and prognosis. However, PRCC exhibited similar characteristics. CK7, GATA3, and FH profiles were also statistically significant. Different chromosomal alterations were found in FH-deficient RCC, and chromosomal alterations were not different between FH-deficient RCC and PRCC. GATA3 was positive in 33 % (7/21) of collecting duct carcinomas and negative in other high-grade renal neoplasms. GATA3 is negative in PRCC, but can be positive in FH-deficient RCC and collecting duct carcinoma. GATA3 expression may indicate a worse outcome in high-grade RCC with papillary architecture. We recommend GATA3 IHC for the differential diagnosis and prognostic assessment of high-grade RCC with papillary architecture.     

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma with aggressive histomorphology--a sarcomatoid variant

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) is a recently described renal epithelial tumor. The bland cytomorphology of the spindled component and low-grade behavior help in its differentiation from sarcomatoid renal carcinoma. Sarcomatoid change has been reported in most histologic variants of renal cell carcinoma apart from MTSCC. Herein we report a case of an MTSCC in a 72-year-old female patient with high-grade spindled areas resembling fibrosarcomatous and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma patterns with metaplastic bone. This index case also demonstrates a high proliferation index and extensive necrosis representing the first documented case of sarcomatoid change in MTSCC.     

Sarcomatoid renal carcinoma: the final common dedifferentiation pathway of renal epithelial malignancies.

Sarcomatoid renal carcinoma (SRC) is an aggressive neoplasm with an age and gender distribution similar to that of conventional (clear cell) renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Genetic and morphologic evidence indicates that the tumor results from de-differentiation of renal epithelial malignancy and associations with RCC, papillary renal carcinoma, chromophobe renal carcinoma and collecting duct carcinoma have been reported. The tumor is composed of sheets of malignant spindle cells that have immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features of both stromal and epithelial cells, and may contain myxoid areas containing osteoclast-like giant cells or pleomorphic sarcomatoid spindle cells resembling rhabdomyoblasts. Rare cases of osteogenic SRC have been described. The tumor shows marked proliferative activity in growth kinetic studies and is usually associated with a poor patient survival that is best predicted by staging.     

Fine‐needle aspiration findings of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma metastatic to a hilar lymph node

Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a specific type of renal cell carcinoma recently placed under the “MiT family translocation RCC” at the last 2013 ISUP Vancouver classification of renal neoplasia. This tumor contains variable proportions of clear cells and could easily mimic papillary RCC, clear cell type, and clear cell papillary RCC. Given the small number of published cytologic findings of this tumor, it could easily present as a diagnostic pitfall. We describe a case of a 23‐year‐old man with a history of prior nephrectomy who presented with multiple mediastinal lymphadenopathies on imaging surveillance follow‐up. Fine‐needle aspiration of the lymph node showed tumor cells with voluminous clear to eosinophilic cytoplasm, well‐defined cell borders and hyperchromatic nuclei arranged in papillary architecture. Review of the prior nephrectomy specimen showed papillary cores surrounded by cells with voluminous clear to finely granular eosinophilic cytoplasm and distinct cell borders. Immunohistochemical stains performed on the nephrectomy specimen showed tumor positivity for CD10, E‐cadherin, a‐methylacyl coenzyme A racemase, and TFE3 supporting the diagnosis of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma. Although this tumor was initially described predominantly in children, it could also occur in adults, as seen in this case. Familiarity with the cytologic findings of this tumor, use of immunohistochemical stains, or cytogenetic test to determine the type of gene fusion will be extremely useful in arriving at the correct diagnosis. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2017;45:456–462. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Kidney-specific cadherin, a specific marker for the distal portion of the nephron and related renal neoplasms.

Renal cell neoplasms are presumably derived from different cell types of the nephron. Clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are thought to be of proximal tubular origin, whereas oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC are derived from intercalated cells of distal nephron. A few molecules, such as RCC marker and CD10, have been shown to be markers for clear cell RCC and papillary RCC. Such markers are not yet available for renal tumors presumably of the distal nephron. The expression of kidney-specific (Ksp) cadherin, a recently cloned gene thought to be transcribed exclusively in the kidney, was studied in normal human kidney, as well as in 105 primary renal neoplasms, including 42 clear cell RCC, 30 papillary RCC, 13 chromophobe RCC, and 20 oncocytomas. The expression patterns were compared with those of RCC marker. The Ksp-cadherin expression was noted preferentially in distal convoluted tubules with a basolateral membrane stain in normal kidney. All 13 chromophobe RCC and 19 of 20 oncocytomas showed diffuse and strong immunoreactivity for Ksp-cadherin, while only 14% clear cell RCC and 13% papillary RCC showed focal positivity. The RCC marker expression was detected in 85%, 98%, 15% and 0% of clear cell RCC, papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, and oncocytoma, respectively. A few clear cell RCC and papillary RCC showed dual expression of both RCC marker and Ksp-cadherin, which appear to have distinct histologic features. These results demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity of Ksp-cadherin for distal convoluted tubules, which can be used as adjunct for diagnosis of chromophobe RCC.     

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma,eosinophilic variant with papillary growth: a case report

We report the case of an 80-year-old man who presented with pathologically diagnosed chromophobe renal cell carcinoma composed of eosinophilic cells with partial papillary growth. The patient had a 2.5 cm diameter renal mass incidentally detected by abdominal ultrasound examination. Laparoscopic left partial nephrectomy was performed under a diagnosis of left renal tumor. Histopathology demonstrated uniform eosinophilic cuboidal cells growing with a partially papillary pattern: differential diagnosis of oncocytoma, papillary renal cell carcinoma, or oncocytic papillary renal cell carcinoma was necessary. Immunohistochemical staining with anti-monoclonal antibody 31 and -CD82 antibody, and choroid iron staining, were positive. Cytogenetic analysis by comparative genomic hybridization showed gains of chromosomes 1p, 9q, 19q, 20, and 21q, and losses of chromosomes 1p and q, 2q, 6q and 7q, leading to diagnosis of chromophobe RCC. We describe differential diagnosis for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, eosinophilic variant, growing in a papillary fashion in the kidney.     

Acquired cystic disease-associated renal cell carcinoma with gain of chromosomes 3, 7, and 16, gain of chromosome X, and loss of chromosome Y

Acquired cystic disease (ACD)-associated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been recently described. To date, there are no reports on genetic findings of G-band karyotype of ACD-associated RCC. In this article, we report the first report of G-band karyotype of ACD-associated RCC. A 66-year-old Japanese man was found to have a left renal tumor during the follow-up of hemodialysis consequent to chronic renal failure. Left nephrectomy was performed. Histological examination of three tumors in the left kidney showed the cribriform or microcystic growth pattern of neoplastic cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, and many oxalate crystals were observed. The G-band karyotype of ACD-associated RCC showed 49, X, +X, −Y, +3, +7, +16. These chromosomal abnormalities resemble those of sporadic papillary RCC that has been previously reported. Finally, we suggest that this tumor may show a close relationship between ACD-associated RCC and papillary RCC, but a large-scale study will be needed to clarify the relationship between ACD-associated RCC and papillary RCC.     

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma of kidney is probably a variant of papillary renal cell carcinoma with spindle cell features

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma is a rare and newly described type of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with a relatively indolent behavior. However, its histogenetic origin or line of differentiation remains unclear. Twelve cases of mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma were identified and retrieved from the files of 3 institutions. Detailed morphological features, as well as their immunohistochemical profile established with markers of proximal renal tubules (RCC marker antigen, CD15, and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase) and of distal renal tubules (kidney-specific cadherin and cytokeratin 7), were studied. The age range of the patients was 35 to 73 years with a median of 56 years. The male to female ratio was 1:3. All of the patients were alive with follow-up between 4 and 38 months. All the tumors were confined to the kidney with a mean tumor size of 6.9 cm (range, 1.8-17 cm). The tumors were composed of variable proportions of tubular and spindle cell areas with focal to prominent mucinous or myxoid stroma. Foamy macrophages were seen in 10 cases and were prominent in 4 cases. A focal compressed tubulopapillary growth pattern was seen in 10 cases. The tumor cells were uniformly cuboidal with ovoid to round nuclei and inconspicuous nucleoli (Furhman nuclear grade 3 in 6 cases). Focal necrosis was seen in 3 cases. Immunostains showed that tumors were positive for RCC marker antigen (11/12), alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (11/12), CD15 (8/12), CD10 (2/12), kidney-specific cadherin (1/12), and cytokeratin 7 (11/12). Its morphological features as well as a strong preferential expression of proximal tubule markers suggest that this tumor is a type of RCC with proximal tubular differentiation, which appears closely related to or represents a morphological variant of papillary RCC.     

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase as a marker in the differential diagnosis of metanephric adenoma.

Metanephric adenoma (MA), a well-described renal neoplasm, usually behaves in a benign fashion. It may have areas that are morphologically similar to papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) type, or epithelial (tubular predominant) type Wilms' tumor. Prior immunohistochemical studies of MA have reported variable staining patterns. Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), a molecular marker for prostate carcinoma, has subsequently been found to be overexpressed in breast, colorectal and ovarian cancers, among others. Recent microarray analysis of renal tumors has shown an increase of AMACR mRNA levels in papillary RCC but not in other subtypes. We investigated the utility of immunohistochemical staining for AMACR, cytokeratin 7(CK7), CD57 and WT1 to differentiate between the above-mentioned three neoplasms. Immunohistochemical stains were performed on paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 25 papillary RCC, 10 MAs and eight Wilms' tumors. AMACR was positive in one (10%) of 10 MAs and 24 (96%) of 25 papillary RCC, while it was negative in all Wilms' tumors. CK7 was positive in 20 of 25 papillary RCCs, focally positive in one Wilms' tumor and was negative in all MAs. CD57 was positive in all six MAs that were stained, focally positive in one of 25 papillary RCC and one of eight Wilms' tumors. WT1 was positive in seven of 10 MAs, three of 25 papillary RCCs and all eight Wilms' tumors. In conclusion, diffuse and strong immunoreactivity for AMACR may be useful in differentiating papillary RCC from MA but a panel which includes AMACR, CK7 and CD57 is better in this differential diagnosis. AMACR is not helpful in differentiating MA from Wilms' tumor, but CD57 is helpful in this differential diagnosis. WT1 may be useful in separating Wilms' tumor from MA and papillary RCC but is not helpful in differentiating MA from papillary RCC.     

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma arising in acquired cystic disease of the kidney: an immunohistochemical and genetic study

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a recently established disease entity. However, there are few reports on genetic study of this entity. We report such a case with focus on genetic study. A 57-year-old Japanese man was found to have 3 renal tumors. Histologically, two tumors showed findings of clear cell RCC; and the other tumor showed findings of clear cell papillary RCC that was characterized by papillary growth pattern of neoplastic cells in cystic space with purely clear cell cytology. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells of clear cell papillary RCC were diffusely positive for PAX2 and cytokeratin 7, but negative for CD10, RCC Ma, and AMACR. In fluorescence in situ hybridization study for one clear cell papillary RCC, we detected polysomy for chromosome 7 and monosomy for chromosomes 17, 16, and 20. In addition, we detected mutation of VHL gene in clear cell RCC, but found no VHL gene mutation in clear cell papillary RCC. Finally, our results provide further evidence that clear cell papillary RCC may be both morphologically and genetically distinct entity from clear cell RCC and papillary RCC.     

Renal mucinous tubular and spindle carcinoma lacks the gains of chromosomes 7 and 17 and losses of chromosome Y that are prevalent in papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma of the kidney is an uncommon, distinctive neoplasm characterized by the proliferation of cuboidal and spindle cells arranged in tubular or sheet-like arrays, typically with a mucinous or myxoid background. The most important differential diagnostic consideration of mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma is papillary renal cell carcinoma, type 1, with sarcomatoid transformation. The aim of our study is to investigate the pattern of possible gains or losses of chromosomes 7, 17 and Y in 10 mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinomas with interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Four-micron sections were obtained from paraffin blocks representative of the tumors and including adjacent non-neoplastic renal parenchyma from 10 patients. The patients' ages ranged from 20 to 80 years (mean: 62 years); eight were female, while two were male. FISH analysis was performed with centromeric probes for chromosomes 7, 17 and Y. One hundred fifty to 200 nuclei from each case were scored for hybridization signals and non-neoplastic parenchyma served as control tissue. We found that renal mucinous tubular and spindle carcinoma lacks the gains of chromosomes 7 and 17 and losses of chromosome Y that are typical of papillary renal cell carcinoma. FISH analysis with centromeric probes for these chromosomes is potentially helpful in differentiating mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinomas from papillary renal cell carcinomas.