Comparison of long-term effects of lymphoblastoid interferon alpha and recombinant interferon alpha-2a therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B

To compare the long-term effect of natural lymphoblastoid interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha nl) and recombinant IFN-alpha 2a therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B, 210 patients in two trials were followed-up for 1.1-15.5 years following the end of therapy. They included 34 patients who received placebo (control), 67 treated with IFN-alpha nl (36 after prednisolone priming) and 109 treated with IFN-alpha 2a (56 after prednisolone priming). The cumulative sustained response was higher in patients who had been treated with IFN-alpha nl after prednisolone priming than was exhibited using IFN-alpha nl alone, IFN-alpha 2a alone or the placebo (P < 0.05), or IFN-alpha 2a following prednisolone priming (P = 0.052) at the end of 11 years. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was detected in 1.5% of the IFN-alpha nl group, 3.7% of the IFN-alpha 2a group and 14.7% of the control group (control vs IFN-alpha nl or IFN-alpha 2a, P < 0.05). The cumulative HCC development was higher in the control group than in the IFN-alpha nl group (P < 0.002) and the IFN-alpha 2a group (P = 0.06). The cumulative survival rate was lower in the control group than in the IFN-alpha nl group (P < 0.01) and the IFN-alpha 2a group (P = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed that IFN-alpha nl therapy and female gender are significant predictors of sustained response; preexisting cirrhosis, age at entry and IFN therapy are significant factors in both HCC development and survival. In conclusion, IFN-alpha nl treatment may have a better long-term effect on hepatitis B virus (HBV) clearance than IFN-alpha 2a and placebo, and IFN therapy may provide better long-term beneficial effects than placebo in terms of HBV clearance, reduction of HCC and prolonged survival.     

长疗程干扰素α-2b联合拉米夫定治疗慢性乙肝的临床观察

目的观察干扰素α-2b联合拉米夫定较长疗程治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者的疗效。方法将慢性乙型肝炎患者137例,随机分为两组,观察组61例,用干扰素α-2b（5万U/次,肌注）隔日1次,连用52周停药,52周后用拉米夫定100mg/d口服,1次/d,用至104周。对照组76例,单用拉米夫定,用法、用量、疗程同观察组。结果治疗104周后两组HBVDNA转阴率、ALT正常率差异无统计学意义（P=0.24）,观察组的HBeAg/抗-HBe血清转换率为42.6%,高于对照组的26.3%（P=0.045）,观察组的HBVYMDD变异率为14.5%,低于对照组的40.8%（P=0.001）。结论干扰素α-2b联合拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎,疗程2年,疗效优于单用拉米夫定,且能减少病毒YMDD变异。     

Hepatitis C virus free-virion and immune-complex dynamics during interferon therapy with and without ribavirin in genotype-1b chronic hepatitis C patients

The Synergistic effect of interferon (IFN) and ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C has been demonstrated, but ribavirin has no apparent direct antiviral effect against hepatitis C virus (HCV) when used as monotherapy. To elucidate the mechanism of ribavirin on enhanced HCV eradication when used in combination therapy, we investigated the serum HCV dynamics of free-virions (FV) and immune-complexes (IC) in genotype-1b infected patients treated with IFN-alpha2b alone (n = 11) or in combination with ribavirin (n = 15). Serum FV- and IC-HCV RNA were separated by immunoprecipitation using anti-human immunoglobulin and quantified serially using real-time detection polymerase chain reaction. At the first phase (day 0-2), the decline of FV- and IC-HCV RNA was similar between the two treatment groups. At the second phase (day 2-28), the decline of IC was significantly faster in patients treated with IFN plus ribavirin compared with IFN alone [exponential decay slope = 0.079 +/- 0.036 vs 0.048 +/- 0.027 log10/day, P = 0.0248; half-life = 81.1 +/- 21.4 vs 135.1 +/- 61.4 h, P = 0.0053], although the second phase FV-decline was not significantly different between the two treatment groups. The fast second phase decline of IC was associated with sustained virological response to therapy. These results suggest that ribavirin may modulate the humoral immune response against HCV and trigger a favourable response to IFN. In conclusion, analysis of early IC-HCV dynamics is useful for predicting the response to therapy and for understanding the mechanism of action of antiviral drugs in chronic hepatitis C patients.     

Up-regulation of IL-18 by interferon alpha-2b/ribavirin combination therapy induces an anti-viral effect in patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent large prospective trials demonstrated that the combination therapy of interferon (IFN)-alpha/ribavirin significantly increased a sustained virological response rate in patients with chronic hepatitis C. However, the potential mechanism of ribavirin is not clear. METHODOLOGY: Serum interleukin (IL)-18 and HCV-RNA titer were determined before and 2 weeks after administration in patients with chronic hepatitis C, who were treated with ribavirin in combination with IFN-alpha2b (combination group), and with IFN-alpha2b alone (monotherapy group). RESULTS: All HCV patients were genotype 1b. In the combination group, the decline of HCV-RNA level by treatment highly correlated with the IL-18 ratio (serum IL-18 level 2 weeks after administration/serum IL-18 level before administration). Similarly, the HCV-RNA level 2 weeks after administration inversely correlated with the IL-18 ratio. In contrast, the IL-18 ratio in the monotherapy group was lower. Furthermore, the decline of HCV-RNA level did not correlate with the IL-18 ratio in the monotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that ribavirin may contribute to the antiviral effect through up-regulation of IL-18 in combination with IFN in patients with chronic hepatitis C.     

Interferon alpha-2b with and without ribavirin in the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B: a randomized study

To study whether interferon (IFN) alpha and ribavirin combination therapy has a beneficial effect for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B, we enrolled 119 such patients in a randomized study. Fifty-nine patients received 5 million units of IFN-alpha2b daily for 4 weeks followed by 5 million units three times a week for 28 weeks, plus 1,200 mg ribavirin daily. Sixty patients received the same dosage of IFN plus placebo. They were followed up for 24 weeks posttreatment, and 105 patients (88%) completed the entire course of 56 weeks. By intention-to-treat analysis, the rate of combined response (serum hepatitis B virus [HBV] DNA <2.5 pg/mL and HBeAg seroconversion) was 17% versus 25% between the IFN/ribavirin and IFN/placebo group, respectively, at the end of treatment (P = .35) and 25% vs. 20% at the end of follow-up (P = .32). Using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay, the log10 reduction of serum HBV DNA was 1.05 +/- 1.72 (mean +/- SD) versus 1.29 +/- 1.91 between the two groups at the end of treatment (P = .49) and was 2.15 +/- 2.15 versus 1.21 +/- 2.48 at the end of follow-up (P = .04). Prolonged observations in 83 patients suggested that the combined response was 29% (n = 17) versus 20% (n = 12) at 48 weeks after the end of treatment, respectively (P = .17). The safety profile was similar, except that the IFN/ribavirin group had a higher risk of anemia (15% vs. 0%; P = .002). In conclusion, for the treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, adding ribavirin does not seem to increase the efficacy of IFN.     

Interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial of combination of ribavirin and high dose interferon-alpha in interferon nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C

This trial investigated the efficacy of a combination of high-dose interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) with ribavirin in IFN nonresponders. Study protocol: 304 patients with chronic hepatitis C were treated with 5 MU IFN-alpha2b (IntronA(R), Schering-Plough) per TIW for 3 months. Nonresponders (defined by HCV-RNA positivity in serum after the 3 months of therapy) were randomized either to continue with IFN (5 MU IFN per TIW followed by 10 MU per TIW for each 3 months) alone (group A) or in combination with ribavirin (1-1.2 g per day) (group B). ALT was measured in monthly intervals, HCV-RNA in 3 monthly intervals. Pretreatment characteristics of the randomized patients were as follows: group A, n = 76; m/f, 54/22; 16% cirrhosis, age, 45. 7 +/- 12 years; ALT (U per litre), 66 +/- 35; group B, n = 81; m/f, 57/24; 17% cirrhosis, age, 48.2 +/- 12; ALT, 71 +/- 40. After 9 months of treatment, nine (11.6%) and 27 (32.5%, P = 0.0066) patients were HCV-RNA negative and 51 and 39 were HCV-RNA positive, in groups A and B, respectively. There were 17 drop-outs in group A and 15 in group B. Six months after treatment only two patients in group A (2.5%) and five (6%, P = 0.06) in group B had normal ALT and no detectable HCV-RNA in serum. In addition to the well-known side-effects of IFN the mean haemoglobin concentration dropped by 2 g per litre in group B. These data indicate that a combination of high-dose IFN with ribavirin is effective in inducing a short-lasting complete response in one-third of IFN nonresponders. Prolonged treatment with IFN/ribavirin may be necessary to obtain a sustained response.     

Pegylated interferon alpha-2b as monotherapy or in combination with ribavirin in chronic hepatitis delta

Therapy of chronic hepatitis delta with standard interferon therapy has met with limited efficacy. This study was designed to examine the efficacy and safety of peginterferon with or without ribavirin. Thirty-eight serum hepatitis B surface antigen- and HDV RNA-positive patients with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) more than 1.5 times the upper normal limit received peginterferon alpha-2b (1.5 microg/kg) alone as monotherapy (n=16) or in combination with ribavirin (n=22), for 48 weeks. Thereafter, all the patients were maintained on peginterferon for 24 weeks and followed for 24 weeks off therapy. The primary end point studied was the virological and biochemical response at the end of follow-up. HDV RNA was determined by single or nested polymerase chain reaction assays. Twenty-seven patients (71%), 11 receiving monotherapy and 16 receiving the combination treatment, completed the follow-up. At the end of treatment, a virological response was observed in 3 of the patients treated with peginterferon (19%) and in 2 of the patients treated with combination therapy (9%), and a biochemical response was observed in 6 (37.5%) and 9 patients (41%), respectively. In nonresponders, ALT diminished from a mean of 174+/-53 to 86+/-41 IU/L. At the end of follow-up, serum HDV RNA was negative in 8 patients (21%), and a biochemical response was detected in 10 patients (26%). Treatment was discontinued in 25% of the patients, and dosing was modified in 58%. In conclusion, a prolonged course of peginterferon alpha-2b resulted in clearance of serum HDV RNA and ALT normalization in a fifth of patients with chronic hepatitis D, while ribavirin had no effect on the viral clearance rate. Overall tolerance of therapy was poor.     

A randomized, double-blind controlled trial of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin vs. interferon alpha-2b and amantadine for treatment of chronic hepatitis C non-responder to interferon monotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Interferon-based regimens (alone or with ribavairin) are standard therapies for chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to compare a 24-week regimen of interferon alpha-2b + ribavirin (IFN + RIBA) to interferon alpha-2b + amantadine (IFN + AMANT) in non-responders to previous interferon monotherapy. METHODS: In a multi-center, double-blind clinical trial, 118 patients (non-responders to previous interferon monotherapy) were equally randomized into the two arms: interferon alpha-2b (3 MU thrice weekly) and ribavirin (800 mg daily) vs. interferon alpha-2b (3 MU thrice weekly) and amantadine (200 mg daily). RESULTS: After 24 weeks of therapy, HCV RNA became undetectable in 34.8% (95% CI: 23.7-49.2) of IFN + RIBA and 19.6% (95% CI: 10.6-34.7) of IFN + AMANT (P = 0.10). This response was sustained in 3.9% (95% CI: 1.0-14.9) of IFN + RIBA and 0% of IFN + AMANT (P = 0.16). Ten patients from IFN + AMANT (17%) and 12 patients (20%) from IFN + RIBA were discontinued before completion of therapy. Of these, 7% in IFN + AMANT and 12% in IFN + RIBA were discontinued due to adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Re-treatment of interferon non-responders with a 24-week course of IFN + AMANT was not associated with any sustained viral eradication. Although IFN + RIBA in this group was associated with a reasonable end of treatment response, relapses were common and sustained responses were low.     

Long-term efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and lamivudine in combination compared to lamivudine monotherapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. An Italian multicenter, randomized trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and lamivudine in combination compared to lamivudine monotherapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive either recombinant interferon alpha-2b (nine million units three times per week) and lamivudine (100 mg/daily per os) for 24 weeks or lamivudine alone (100 mg/daily per os) for 52 weeks. Patients were followed up for a further 48 weeks. RESULTS: Sustained HBeAg seroconversion with undetectable serum levels of HBV DNA was observed in 25 of 76 patients (33%) treated with the combination therapy and in 11 of 75 patients (15%) treated with monotherapy (P=0.014). Histological improvement defined as a reduction of at least two points in the inflammation score as compared with pretreatment score was observed in 35 of 76 patients (46%) treated with combination therapy and in 20 of 75 patients (27%) treated with monotherapy (P=0.021). Both therapeutic regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Six-month treatment with interferon alpha-2b and lamivudine in combination appeared to increase the rate of sustained HBeAg seroconversion compared to 1-year lamivudine monotherapy. However, the potential benefit of combining lamivudine and interferon should be investigated further in studies with different regimens of combination therapy.     

Efficacy of hepatitis B vaccination and interferon-alpha-2b combination therapy versus interferon-alpha-2b monotherapy in children with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND: Although interferon (IFN) has been approved in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in children, it is effective only in 30-40% of patients. In some studies it has been suggested that therapeutic use of anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine may be beneficial in patients with chronic hepatitis B. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of hepatitis B vaccination and IFN-alpha-2b in combination and IFN-alpha-2b monotherapy in children with chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: Fifty treatment-naive children with chronic hepatitis B infection were randomly assigned to receive either 5 million units/m(2) recombinant IFN-alpha-2b subcutaneously three times per week for 9 months, and pre-S2/S vaccine at the beginning and 4 and 24 weeks after initiation of IFN therapy (n = 25) or recombinant IFN-alpha-2b (5 million units/m(2) subcutaneously thrice weekly) alone for 9 months (n = 25). Children were followed for at least 6 months after the end of therapy. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the mean alanine aminotransferase levels, histologic activity index and fibrosis scores between combination and IFN monotherapy groups at the end of the therapy and end of the follow-up period. When combination and monotherapy groups were compared, the mean HBV-DNA values were significantly reduced in combination group at the end of the therapy (P = 0.004), but no statistically significant difference was found at the end of the follow up. Sustained HBeAg seroconversion with clearance of HBV-DNA was obtained in 13 of 25 children (52%) treated with combination therapy, and in eight of 25 patients (32%) treated with IFN monotherapy (P = 0.251). CONCLUSION: Although the difference was statistically insignificant, the sustained response rates were better in the combination therapy group than in the monotherapy group. The potential benefit of combining IFN and hepatitis B vaccine should be investigated in further studies with different regimens of combination therapy.     

Successful treatment with peginterferon alfa-2b of HBeAg-positive HBV non-responders to standard interferon or lamivudine

OBJECTIVES: Antiviral therapy leads to HBeAg seroconversion in 10-40% of the patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Nonresponse may result in progression of liver disease and increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. As part of a global randomized controlled trial we investigated the efficacy (i.e., loss of HBeAg at the end of follow-up) of peginterferon alfa-2b (Peg-IFN alpha2b) in patients who failed to respond to previous courses of standard interferon (IFN) or lamivudine. METHODS: We analyzed a total of 76 previous nonresponders: 37 were nonresponders to standard IFN, 17 were nonresponders to lamivudine, and 22 were nonresponders to both therapies. All patients received a 52-wks course of 100 microg Peg-IFN alpha2b weekly combined with either 100 mg lamivudine daily or a placebo. After therapy patients were followed for 26 wks. RESULTS: Thirteen (35%) nonresponders to previous IFN, five (29%) nonresponders to previous lamivudine, and four (22%) nonresponders to both IFN and lamivudine responded to treatment with Peg-IFN alpha2b. No difference in response was found for those treated with Peg-IFN alpha2b alone or in combination with lamivudine. Nonresponders to prior IFN therapy with baseline ALT (alanine aminotransferase) > 4 x ULN (upper limit of normal) responded better to Peg-IFN alpha2b than those with ALT levels 相似文献   

拉米夫定与α干扰素联合治疗慢性乙型肝炎

目的 观察拉米夫定(LAM)联合干扰素α1b(IFNα1b)治疗慢性乙型肝炎的近期疗效和安全性。方法 HBV DNA和HBeAg均阳性的90例慢性乙型肝炎患者，按1：1：1的比例进入三个不同的治疗组。联合治疗组：用IFNα1b 5MU，隔日肌肉注射，及口服LAM 100mg／d，共6个月，随后单用口服LAM 100mg／d6个月；LAM组：口服LAM 100mg／d共12月：IFN组：IFN α1b 5MU，隔日肌肉注射，共6个月。结果 治疗结束时，HBV DNA转阴率，联合治疗组为90．0％，LAM组为80％，IFN组为46．7％。丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)复常率，联合治疗组为90．0％，LAM组为80．0％，IFN组为53．3％。HBeAg／抗HBe血清转换率，联合治疗组为46．7％，LAM组为13．3％，IFN组为33．3％。联合治疗组患者治疗结束时无一例检测到YMDD变异。结论 联合治疗组对HBV DNA抑制作用及ALT复常率高于单用干扰素组，与单用拉米夫定组接近。HBeAg／抗HBe血清转换率高于拉米夫定组，与单用干扰素组相近。初步显示联合治疗组发生YMDD变异较少。     

Viusid, a nutritional supplement, in combination with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is associated to severe oxidative stress that leads to necro-inflammation and progression of fibrosis. Previous trials suggested that antioxidative therapy may have a beneficial effect. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Viusid in combination with interferon alpha-2b (IFN alpha-2b) and ribavirin in patients with CHC. METHODS: We randomly assigned 100 patients, between October 2002 and December 2004, in two arms: IFN alpha-2b (5 MU on alternate days), ribavirin at a dose of 13 mg/kg daily and Viusid (three sachets daily) vs. IFN alpha-2b (5 MU on alternate days) and ribavirin at a dose of 13 mg/kg daily. Subjects were treated for 48 weeks and then followed for an additional 24 weeks. The primary end point was the histologic response (reduction of at least two points without fibrosis worsening in the total score on the Histological Activity Index). RESULTS: A significantly high proportion of patients who received combined therapy plus Viusid had a histologic response better than those patients who received IFN alpha-2b and ribavirin (57% vs. 37%, P=0.03). The patients with virologic response achieved the highest percentages of histologic response, irrespective of assigned treatment. Among non-responders, the highest reduction in the mean change from baseline score for necro-inflammatory activity (NA) and fibrosis (F) was reported in patients treated with Viusid [NA, -1.50 (Viusid), -1.20 (without Viusid); F, -0.31 (Viusid), 0.00 (without Viusid)]. Sustained normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase concentration was highest in the Viusid group compared with standard therapy (67% vs. 41%, P=0.009). The overall safety profile was similar in both groups, but interestingly, the anemia was less intense in the group with Viusid (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that triple therapy with Viusid, IFN alpha-2b and ribavirin was well tolerated and may have a beneficial effect on histologic and biochemical variables. The intensity of anemia is reduced in patients treated with Viusid.     

Retreatment for 24 vs 48 weeks with interferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin of chronic hepatitis C patients who relapsed or did not respond to interferon alone

We assessed the efficacy of interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin over 24 or 48 weeks for the retreatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C who had relapsed or did not respond to a previous course of IFN. One-hundred and twenty patients (69 non-responders and 51 relapsers) were randomly assigned to receive IFN-alpha2b (3 million units thrice weekly) plus ribavirin (1,000-1,200 mg per day) for 24 weeks (group A: 58 patients) or 48 weeks (group B: 62 patients). Treatment was discontinued at week 12 if the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level remained elevated. The rate of sustained response was 15.5% in group A and 37.1% in group B (P = 0.013). Relapsers treated for 48 weeks had a sustained response rate of 66.6% compared with a sustained response rate of only 25% in those treated for 24 weeks (P = 0.004). Moreover, a sustained response was seen in 14.3% of non-responders treated for 48 weeks and in 8.8% of those treated for 24 weeks (P = 0.71). Fifty-three per cent of patients with a normal ALT level and undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at week 12 had a sustained response compared with 14% of those who were HCV RNA positive at week 12 (P < 0.001). Independent predictive factors of sustained response were: therapy for 48 weeks (P = 0.0026), relapse after IFN treatment (P = 0.0006), loss of HCV RNA at week 12 (P = 0.0008) and HCV genotype non-1 (P = 0.024). Hence, in patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to a previous course of IFN monotherapy, combination therapy with IFN plus ribavirin for 48 weeks seems to be more effective than IFN plus ribavirin for 24 weeks.     

Comparison of a 6-month course peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin and interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in treating Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis C in Taiwan

Previous studies in Caucasian patients showed treatment of chronic hepatitis C with pegylated interferon/ribavirin was well tolerated, and produced a higher response rate especially in genotype 1 infections. However, it is unknown whether this conclusion can be extrapolated to patients with Chinese ethnic origin. A total of 153 patients with biopsy-proven chronic hepatitis C were randomly assigned to receive either weekly injection of peginterferon alpha-2b 1.5 mcg/kg plus oral ribavirin (1000 or 1200 mg/day, depending on body weight) (PEG group, n = 76) or 3 MU of interferon alpha-2b t.i.w. plus ribavirin (IFN group, n = 77) for 24 weeks. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as the sustained disappearance of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 24 weeks after the end of treatment by polymerase chain reaction assay. Baseline demographic, viral and histological characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Using an intent-to-treat analysis, HCV genotype 1 patients showed a significantly higher SVR in patients receiving PEG-IFN rather than IFN (65.8%vs 41.0%, P = 0.019), but no difference was found in genotype non-1 patients (PEG vs IFN: 68.4%vs 86.8%, P = 0.060). Genotype 1 patients (28.6%) in the PEG-IFN group relapsed, as compared with 52.9% in the IFN group (P = 0.040). Multivariate analyses showed early virological response at week 12 of therapy and genotype non-1 were significant predictors to SVR. As compared with the IFN group, patients receiving PEG-IFN had a significantly higher rate of discontinuation, dose reduction, fever, headache, insomnia, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia. In genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C Chinese patient, PEG-IFNalpha2b ribavirin had significantly better SVR and lower relapse rate when compared to IFN/ribavirin. Both regimens can be recommended for genotype non-1 chronic hepatitis C Chinese patients. However, a higher rate of adverse events and discontinuance of therapy were noted in patients treated with PEG-IFNalpha2b ribavirin.     

Treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to interferon with high-dose interferon alpha with or without ribavirin: final results of a prospective randomized trial. Austrian Hepatitis Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of high-dose interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) with or without ribavirin in interferon (IFN) non-responders. STUDY DESIGN: 304 chronic hepatitis C patients received 5 MU IFN-alpha2b (IntronA, Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) three times a week for 3 months. Non-responders were randomized either to continue with IFN (IFN 5 MU/TIW followed by 10 MU/TIW, each for 3 months) alone (group A: n = 76, m: f = 54: 22, age 45.7 +/- 12 years, 16% cirrhosis, alanine aminotransferase [ALT] 66 +/- 35 U/l) or in combination with ribavirin (approximately 14 mg/kg/day) (group B: n = 81, m: f = 57: 24, age 48.2 +/- 12 years, 17% cirrhosis, ALT 71 +/- 40 U/l). At the end of treatment, patients were followed for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Virological response at end of treatment and 6 months thereafter. SETTING: University hospitals and tertiary referral centres. RESULTS: At the end of treatment, eight (10.8%) and 25 (31.3%, P= 0.0066) patients were HCV-RNA negative, and 51 and 39 were HCV-RNA positive, in groups A and B, respectively. There were 17 drop-outs in each group. Six months after treatment, only one patient in group A (1.3%) and seven patients (8.6%, P= 0.06) in group B had normal ALT and undetectable serum HCV-RNA. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of high-dose IFN with ribavirin induces a short-lasting complete response in about one-third of IFN-non-responders.     

Lamivudine/pegylated interferon alfa-2b sequential combination therapy compared with lamivudine monotherapy in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Monotherapy has been proven insufficient in achieving sustained control of chronic hepatitis B. We aimed to assess the efficacy of combined sequential administration of lamivudine and pegylated interferon alfa-2b in patients with hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: Eighteen patients were given sequential combination treatment starting with 3 months of lamivudine monotherapy followed by 9 months of pegylated interferon alfa-2b (after a 3-month period of concomitant administration of the two drugs) and 24 patients received lamivudine monotherapy. RESULTS: At the end of treatment, 88.9% of the patients who received sequential combination treatment and 70.8% of those who received lamivudine monotherapy had hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels below 400 copies/mL (P = not significant). At the end of treatment, 72.2% of the patients who received sequential combination treatment and 70.8% of those who received lamivudine monotherapy achieved alanine aminotransferase normalization (P = not significant). After 12 months of follow up, 33.3% of the patients who received sequential combination treatment and 16.7% of those who received lamivudine monotherapy had HBV-DNA levels below 400 copies/mL (P = 0.4). After 12 months of follow up, 72.2% of the patients who received sequential combination treatment and 25.0% of those who received lamivudine monotherapy had normal alanine aminotransferase levels (P < 0.01). Twenty-five percent of the patients in the lamivudine monotherapy group had virological breakthrough compared to none in the sequential combination treatment group (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Sequential combination treatment is able to improve sustained biochemical response rates and prevent the emergence of lamivudine-resistant mutants in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.     

Efficacy of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or lamivudine combination with recombinant interferon in non-responders to interferon in hepatitis B virus-related chronic liver disease patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Non-response to interferon (IFN) monotherapy is a major therapeutic problem in the management of chronic hepatitis B infection. The efficacy of combination therapy to enhance the immunomodulatory effect of IFN by combining granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GMCSF) or decreasing viral load by adding an antiviral agent such as lamivudine was evaluated prospectively. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with chronic hepatitis B who were non-responders to previous IFN therapy were randomized to receive an IFN and GMCSF (group A, n = 10) or IFN and lamivudine (group B, n = 14) combination for 6 months. The end-of-treatment response was assessed by hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) determination. RESULTS: All patients successfully completed both the treatment schedules. The mean age, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, liver histology, HBV-DNA levels and distribution of HBV genotypes were comparable between the two groups. At the end of treatment there was a significant decrease in mean ALT levels. The HBV-DNA and HBeAg loss was seen in six of 10 (60%) patients in group A and in seven of 14 (50%) patients in group B. During a mean follow-up of 15 +/- 3 months, two of six (33%) patients in group A and three of seven (43%) patients in group B relapsed with HBV-DNA and HBeAg positivity, which meant an overall sustained response of 40% and 28%, respectively. None of the factors such as HBV viral load, ALT levels or liver histology could predict the non-response to combination therapy or occurrence of relapse. There was a trend in patients with genotype A compared with genotype D towards non-response to therapy, although the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of IFN plus GMCSF or lamivudine was effective in non-responders to IFN monotherapy. Larger studies using such combination therapies would be helpful in improving treatment strategies for chronic hepatitis B.     

Retreatment with interferon and ribavirin vs interferon alone according to viraemia in interferon responder-relapser hepatitis C patients: a prospective multicentre randomized controlled study

Low pretreatment viral load has consistently been shown to be an independent predictor of sustained response (SR) in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. We assessed the efficacy of interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin vs IFN alone in low viraemic patients (<2 millions copies/mL) who had relapsed to a previous course of IFN and the efficacy of 24 vs 48 week combination therapy in high viraemic patients. Two hundred and ninety-seven patients were randomly assigned to one of the four regimens after stratification on pretreatment viral load. All patients received IFN-alpha2b (6 million units thrice weekly for 24 weeks and 3 million units thrice weekly for 24 weeks). Patients with low viraemia received either IFN-alpha2b alone for 48 weeks (R1: 42 patients) or IFN-alpha2b plus ribavirin (600 mg/day) for 24 weeks and IFN-alpha2b alone for the next 24 weeks (R2: 48 patients). Patients with high viral load received either IFN-alpha2b plus ribavirin for 24 weeks and then IFN-alpha2b alone for the next 24 weeks (R3: 104 patients) or IFN-alpha2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks (R4: 103 patients). In low viraemic patients the rate of SR was 37.7% in group R1 and 59.6% in group R2 (P < 0.05). In high viraemic patients, the rate of SR was 44.7% in group R3 and 51.4% in group R4 (P: NS). Thirty-one patients discontinued treatment (10.4%) without difference regarding treatment regimen. In the regimen using ribavirin we found no difference in terms of SR between patients receiving a dose of ribavirin below 10.6 mg/kg/day (55%) or over 10.6 mg/kg/day (58%). Histological improvement occurred in 70.2% of patients regardless of the regimen. Logistic regression showed that genotype 2 and 3, Knodell score <6 and alanine aminotransferase pretreatment level >3 x upper limit of normal were significantly and independently correlated with SR. In low viraemic patients who relapsed to a previous IFN treatment, combination therapy using high-dose IFN and low-dose ribavirin is better than high-dose IFN alone. In high viraemic patients there was no benefit in increasing the duration of combination therapy from 24 to 48 weeks. In this study, it was found that low dose of ribavirin can be used safely and there is no effect of ribavirin dose on SR.     

A randomized trial of amantadine and interferon versus interferon alone as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C

The aim of this study was to compare, in an open-label study, the efficacy and safety of a combination of interferon (IFN) and amantadine (AMA) with that of IFN alone in previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C. A total of 200 patients were randomized to 6 MU of IFN-alpha2a 3 times per week, with 200 mg of AMA daily (n = 99) or to an identical dose of interferon alpha2a (n = 101). Patients were treated for 12 months and observed for 6 months' posttreatment. At the completion of treatment, 28.7% of patients in the monotherapy group and 45.5% in the combination group had a virologic response (P =.014). At 6 months' posttreatment, a sustained virologic response was observed in 16.8% (95% CI: 9-23) of patients with IFN alone versus 29.3% (95% CI: 19-37) of patients who were treated with combination therapy (P =.036). In each of the 2 treatments, genotype was the only predictive parameter for a sustained response. At the logistic regression analysis, therapy and genotype were the only 2 parameters with an independent predictive value. In the combination group, at examination of month 3, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA status had a 97.6% (95% CI: 93-102) positive predictive value and a 50% (95% CI: 37-63) negative predictive value for a sustained virologic clearance. A substantial proportion of na?ve patients with chronic hepatitis C have an end-of-treatment and end-of-follow-up virologic and biochemical response to a combination of IFN and AMA. This new treatment appears safe and well tolerated.