Long-term results of bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement: the pericardial perspective

Pericardial valve bioprostheses were introduced in early 1970s and were widely used in the 1980s. The longterm results with the Ionescu-Shiley valve, the first commercially available pericardial valve, were disappointing because of high rate cusp tears during the first decade after implantation. The enthusiasm for this type of bioprosthetic valve was further hampered by the premature failure of the Hancock pericardial valve. The long-term results of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve, which was introduced in 1981, indicated that that valve was durable and the issue of cusp tears had been resolved by an appropriate design. This knowledge prompted surgeons to revisit the merits of pericardial valves for mitral valve replacement and several other pericardial valves are now commercially available. The largest data on long-term results are with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial mitral valve. The reported freedom from structure valve failure ranged from 69% to 85% at 10 years in patient population with mean age of 60 to 70 years. Young age is a major determinant of valve failure, which is largely due to calcification. There are also long-term data, albeit more limited on the Sorin Pericarbon and Mitroflow valves used for mitral valve replacement. This paper review the published experience with various pericardial bioprosthetic valves used for mitral valve replacement during the past 3 decades.     

人工心脏瓣膜置换手术后的远期随访

目的　随访 5 5 0 6例次人工心脏瓣膜置换术后病人的远期临床结果 ,全面评价远期疗效。方法　 1976年 5月至 1997年 5月 ,在阜外心血管病医院外科实施人工瓣膜置换手术 5 5 0 6例次 ,共 5 2 79例病人 ,其中男 2 76 8例 ,女 2 5 11例 ;平均年龄 (39 86± 10 73)岁。共置换人工瓣膜 6 816枚。总随访率为86 8% ,平均随访 6 5 9年 (0 80～ 2 2 5 8年 ) ,随访总人年次为 2 86 0 8 94病人 年。结果　手术总死亡率为5 98%。人工生物瓣膜结构性衰坏发生率 1 5 7%病人 年。全组血栓栓塞发生率 0 2 2 %病人 年 (机械瓣组为 0 2 8%病人 年 ,生物瓣组为 0 0 7%病人 年 ,P =0 0 0 0 0 )。出血事件发生率 1 0 0 %病人 年 (机械瓣组为 1 34%病人 年 ,生物瓣组为 0 15 %病人 年 ,P =0 0 0 0 0 )。再手术为 0 4 5 %病人 年 (机械瓣组 0 0 2 %病人 年 ,生物瓣组为 1 6 1%病人 年 ,P =0 0 0 0 0 )。再手术原因以生物瓣衰坏为主 ,占再手术 96 35 %。远期死亡率 0 79%病人 年 ,5年生存率 (96 34± 0 31) % ,10年生存率 (92 4 8± 0 5 8) % ,15年生存率 (87 97± 1 13) % ,2 0年生存率 (82 5 1± 2 94 ) %。远期瓣膜相关死亡率 0 6 0 %病人 年 ,5年免除瓣膜相关死亡(97 2 1± 0 2 7) % ,10年     

Long-term results of valve replacement with the CarboMedics prosthetic heart valve

This study examined the long-term results of the CarboMedics prosthetic heart valve. Between July 1990 and May 2000, 256 CarboMedics valve prostheses (120 single aortic, 62 single mitral, and 34 double aortic/mitral) were implanted into 216 patients (mean age 57.8 years). The mean follow-up was 57.7 +/- 36 months (maximum 133 months) with a total of 1,038.4 patient years. Patient survival, including operative deaths, was 85.1% at 10 years. Linearized rates for various complications were thromboembolism 0.39% per patient year, bleeding events 0.39% per patient year; prosthetic valve endocarditis 0.29% per patient year, nonstructural dysfunction 0.87% per patient year, and reoperation 0.39% per patient year. There were no valve thrombosis or structural valve failures in this series. The probabilities of freedom from thromboembolism and reoperation at 10 years were 96.3% and 93.1%, respectively. In conclusion, the CarboMedics valve can be used satisfactorily with a low incidence of thromboembolism and valve thrombosis.     

Long-term clinical results after aortic valve replacement with mechanical heart valves and mitral valve replacement with porcine valves]

Long-term clinical results of aortic valve replacement (AVR) with mechanical heart valves and mitral valve replacement (MVR) with porcine valves were analysed. Sixty-three patients received isolated AVR and 48 received isolated MVR. Sixty-eight patients with MVR including double or triple valve replacement were also added in order to evaluate the primary tissue failure (PTF). The patients with operative deaths were excluded. Survival rate at 11 years in AVR was 68 +/- 10% and 67 +/- 15% in MVR without statistical difference. At 11 years, 76 +/- 8% of the patients in AVR were free from valve-related complications in contrast with the poor result of 34 +/- 31% in MVR (p less than 0.01). Main cause of this poor result in MVR was PTF as indicated in following event free rates; 83 +/- 9% at 7 years, 61 +/- 25% at 10 years and 49 +/- 31% at 13 years. There was no statistical difference between patients of above 50 years and below 49 years in PTF. Valve-related death event free was 93 +/- 5% in AVR and 86 +/- 11% in MVR at 11 years (not significant), however, there was statistical difference in re-operation event free rate as 94 +/- 5% in AVR and 76 +/- 11% in MVR at 11 years (p less than 0.001). These results suggest that the use of porcine valves in mitral position is confined to the selected patients.     

Double bioprosthetic valve replacement in right-sided carcinoid heart disease

A patient with tricuspid and pulmonary regurgitation due to carcinoid syndrome successfully underwent double bioprosthetic valve replacement. This technique avoids anticoagulation treatment in a patient with hepatic dysfunction and facilitates future hepatic de-arterialization as a treatment option in carcinoid disease. Advances in treatment of carcinoid syndrome may have reduced the risk of early bioprosthetic degeneration.     

Comparison of bioprosthetic and mechanical valve replacement for active endocarditis

The choice between bioprosthetic or mechanical prosthetic valve replacement for active valvular endocarditis has been controversial. To establish the role of each, we reviewed the case histories of 185 patients who underwent valve replacement for active valvular endocarditis during the past 5 years. All patients had life-threatening, active bacterial endocarditis of a native or prosthetic valve. Group I (88 patients) had replacement with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valve and Group II (97 patients) with the St. Jude Medical valve. The male/female distribution, age range, and functional classification were the same in the two groups. Mean follow-up was approximately 20 months for both groups. Valve replacement was done because of native valve endocarditis in 76 patients in Group I and 49 patients in Group II. Of the remainder of the Group I patients, six had endocarditis of a bioprosthesis and six of a mechanical valve; of the remainder of Group II patients, 30 had endocarditis of a bioprosthesis and 18 of a mechanical valve. Early mortality was not significantly different between the two groups (14 deaths in each group). Of the 74 survivors in Group I, 15 underwent valve reoperation, 10 because of recurrent endocarditis and five because of sterile perivalvular leakage. The frequency of reoperation was significantly different (p less than 0.01) from that in Group II, in which only five patients underwent valve reoperation, four for recurrent endocarditis and one for sterile perivalvular leakage. The actuarial rate for freedom from reoperation was also significantly higher in Group II patients; 94.6% were free from reoperation at 4 years compared to 75% at 4 years in Group I patients (p less than 0.01). The actuarial survival rate, which also differed significantly between groups, was 78.7% at 4 years in Group I and 87.4% at 4 years in Group II (p less than 0.05). Patients receiving a bioprosthesis for active endocarditis had a significantly higher reoperation rate and a significantly greater incidence of recurrent endocarditis (p less than 0.01). Therefore, we prefer to use a mechanical valve for valve replacement in most patients who have active endocarditis.     

Intermediate results of aortic valve replacement using 19 mm bioprosthetic valve

Pre- and postoperative hemodynamic parameters and activity of daily life were reviewed to estimate the effectiveness of the valve in 12 cases of single aortic valve replacement (AVR) using 19 mm bioprosthesis. All implanted prostheses were stented-valves. Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve was used in 7 cases and Mosaic valve in 5. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) significantly decreased from 167 +/- 36 to 133 +/- 27 g/m2 in the early postoperative period, and to 115 +/- 24 g/m2 in the intermediate phase. However, postoperative LVMI remained higher in patients with body surface area (BSA) over 1.5 m2 than in those under 1.5 m2. Postoperative activity indicated by New York Heart Association (NYHA) grade significantly improved from 2.3 +/- 1.1 to 1.4 +/- 0.5. These results indicates usefulness of 19 mm bioprosthetic valve for reducing left ventricular hypertrophy and improving activity, especially in patients with BSA smaller than 1.5 m2.     

Prosthetic replacement of tricuspid valve: bioprosthetic or mechanical

BACKGROUND: Tricuspid valve replacement is one of the most challenging operations in cardiac surgery. Selection of the suitable prosthesis is still debatable. METHODS: In our institution, between January 1980 and December 2000, 129 tricuspid valve replacements were performed in 122 patients (14.7%). Bioprosthetic valves were used in 32 patients, whereas 97 patients had mechanical valve implantation. Twenty-two percent of replacements were done on men. Mean age was 35.27+/-11.56 years. In all patients, initially an annuloplasty technique was tried. Tricuspid valve replacement was performed when annuloplasty was not sufficient. In most of the cases, tricuspid valve interventions were done under cardiopulmonary bypass and on a beating heart. RESULTS: Early mortality was 24.5%. Patients were followed for 2 to 228 months. Seven patients underwent reoperation because of tricuspid valve dysfunction (7.6%). Nine patients died during the follow-up period. Late mortality was 9.7%. Actuarial estimates of survival in 20 years of follow-up for all tricuspid prosthetic valves, mechanical valves, and bioprosthetic valves were 65.1%+/-9.3%, 68.3%+/-10.6%, and 54.8%+/-12.1%, respectively. For the bioprosthetic valve group, freedom from structural valve degeneration was 90%+/-5.5%; for the mechanical valve group, freedom from deterioration, endocarditis, and leakage was 97.8%+/-4.2%, and freedom from thromboembolism was 92.6%+/-6.9%. CONCLUSIONS: We found that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of early mortality, re-replacement, and midterm mortality (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, we recommend low profile modern bileaflet mechanical valves for prosthetic replacement of the tricuspid valve, due to their favorable hemodynamic characteristics and durability.     

Comparative analysis of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves after aortic valve replacement

Comparative long-term performance characteristics of Bj?rk-Shiley mechanical and bioprosthetic valves were analyzed for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement between 1976 and 1981. A total of 419 patients received either a standard Bj?rk-Shiley (n = 266) or bioprosthetic (porcine, n = 126, or pericardial, n = 27) aortic valve. Cumulative patient follow-up was 1,705 patient-years; the average patient follow-up was 4.1 +/- 2.7 years. Survival data were obtained for all but 11 patients (97% complete follow-up) up to 9 years after operation. Survival at 5 years was 81% +/- 4% (+/- standard error) for Bj?rk-Shiley and for bioprosthetic valve recipients. Valve failure in the Bj?rk-Shiley group was predominantly due to valve-related mortality and did not result from structural failure. Patients with bioprosthetic valves experienced valve failure as a result of prosthetic valve endocarditis and intrinsic valve degeneration. Although patients with bioprostheses experienced a lower incidence of valve-related morbidity than Bj?rk-Shiley valve recipients (p less than 0.03), no difference could be demonstrated in the incidence of valve-related mortality or valve failure at 5 years between bioprosthetic and Bj?rk-Shiley valves. Mortality rate from valve failure was higher for Bj?rk-Shiley (86%, 12/14) than bioprosthetic valves (36%, 5/14) (p less than 0.01).     

Long-term results of aortic valve replacement

In order to improve the quality of life after cardiac valvular surgery, new procedures and new prostheses have been developed in the past decade. Surgeons have many alternatives for the individual patient. However, some may only represent a trend without any clinical advantage, some may increase the surgical risk, and some may have limited indications for specific types of heart disease. Therefore the selection of the procedure and prosthesis is very important. The new mechanical valves have a thinner ring and cuff, providing a larger orifice for patients with a small aortic annulus, and enlargement procedures are now rarely required. Second-generation biological valves have been used for more than 15 years. In the aortic position in elderly patients, the rate of freedom from structural deterioration is over 90% at 15 years. The stentless valve is the most notable newer prosthesis and has significant hemodynamic advantages, associated with good myocardial remodeling.     

Tricuspid valve replacement: UK heart valve registry mid-term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses

Background. Little is known of time-related outcome and comparative performance of biological and mechanical prostheses following tricuspid valve replacement (TVR).

Methods. A retrospective UK Heart Valve Registry study (Jan 1, 1986 to June 30, 1997) identified 425 patients who underwent TVR. Two-hundred twenty-five (52.9%) received biological and 200 (47.1%) received mechanical valves. One-hundred sixty (38%), 158, and 76 had isolated, double, and triple valve replacements, respectively. The follow-up was 96% complete with a total of 1,585 patient-years.

Results. Thirty-day mortality for TVR was 17.3% (73 deaths). One-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 72.2%, 59.9%, and 42.9%, respectively. Year of operation (p = 0.04), age (p = 0.04), and number of valves implanted (p = 0.03) predicted overall mortality. Age (p < 0.001) and year of operation (p = 0.002) predicted overall survival. Thirty-day mortality for biological and mechanical prostheses was 18.8% and 15.6%, respectively. One-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 70.5%, 61.5%, and 47.7% for biological and 74.0%, 57.9%, and 33.9% for mechanical prostheses, respectively. Freedom from reoperation at 1 and 10 years was 98.7% and 97.4%. Freedom from death or reoperation was 71.2% at 1 year and 41.9% at 10 years. None of the above outcomes was significantly different between the type of valve prostheses.

Conclusions. TVR carries a high 30-day mortality and a poor longer term survival. No superiority could be identified for biological or mechanical prostheses in the tricuspid position for either survival or reoperation.     

有支架与无支架生物瓣膜行主动脉瓣置换临床对比研究

目的　探讨无支架Medtronic生物瓣行主动脉瓣置换的临床效果。方法　将 6 8例同期施行主动脉瓣置换术病人分为 2组 ,38例行无支架Medtronic生物瓣置换 ,30例对照组行有支架生物瓣置换。术前及术后 2个月随访行超声心动图检查。结果　无支架组和有支架组病人术后各项检测指标差异有显著性意义。无支架组跨瓣压差 (18 0± 3 7)mmHg(1mmHg =0 133kPa)明显低于有支架组(33 7± 8 3)mmHg;左室射血分数 0 6 5± 0 0 5 ,明显高于有支架组 0 5 6± 0 0 8;左室收缩末内径和左室舒张末内径分别为 (3 8± 0 8)cm和 (4 5± 0 4 )cm ,明显低于有支架组 (4 2± 1 4 )cm和 (5 1± 0 9)cm ;无支架组瓣环内径 (2 2 1± 1 8)mm大于有支架组 (19 5± 1 7)mm。结论　无支架Medtronic生物瓣较有支架生物瓣具有较低的跨瓣压差和良好的血流动力学 ,能促进左室功能的恢复。     

"Mosaic" medtronic bioprosthetic valve replacement clinical results and hemodynamical performance

BACKGROUND: We report the mid-term results of a prospective trial of a new bioprosthetic valve. The Mosaic bioprosthesis consists of porcine aortic valve that has been cross linked ed in glutaraldehyde solution under zero-pressure fixation and treated with alpha amino oleic acid to reduce the potential for calcification. METHODS: Mosaic bioprosthetic valve replacement was performed in 67 consecutive patients between January 1995 and August 1998. There were 37 patients having aortic valve replacement (AVR) and 30 having mitral valve replacement (MVR) who entered this study. The patients age ranged 56 to 86 years (mean 74.9); 38 were female and 29 were male; 44 were in NYHA grade 3 and 21 were NYHA grade 4. All mitral valve replacements were performed with total preservation of subvalvular apparatus. Echocardiographic assessment of valve and LV function were performed on 7th day, 6 months 1,2 and 3 years. RESULTS: There was no hospital mortality. 3 year survival was 85.9+/-5.9% for AVR and 100% for MVR. Freedom from antithromboembolic related haemorrhage has been 96.7% for MVR and 91.9% for AVR. Freedom from the transient neurological event was 96.7+/-3.3% for MVR and 100% for AVR Freedom from structural valve failure, permanent thromboembolism, thrombosis or endocarditis has been 100% for both AVR and MVR. In AVR group left ventricle mass, left ventricle mass index significantly decreased, when cardiac index and effective orifice area increased significantly during study period. Transvalvular gradient did not change. In MVR group transvalvular gradient, effective orifice area and cardiac index did not change. CONCLUSIONS: The valve was user friendly. The early results are very satisfactory. Echocardiography measurements after aortic valve replacement are showing very marked late postoperative remodelling of left ventricle. After mitral valve replacement there were exceptionally low transvalvular gradients, no left ventricle outflow tract obstruction.     

Pulmonary valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis. Promising results of 28 procedures in patients with congenital heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary valve replacement is performed increasingly late after correction of Tetralogy of Fallot. Most reports deal with pulmonary allografts as the valvar substitute of choice, although late deterioration and reoperation(s) are the rule. Mechanical valves are scarcely reported and if so only because of complications. Although life-long anticoagulation therapy is indicated for mechanical prostheses, the chance of subsequent re-operations can be expected to be low. We report the results of 28 mechanical valve replacements in the pulmonary position. METHODS: A mechanical valve was implanted in 27 of 79 patients indicated for pulmonary valve replacement. Tetralogy of Fallot was the most common basic lesion. The results and follow-up were reviewed retrospectively, where death and re-operation were primary end points. Routine outpatient follow-up, including trans-thoracic echocardiography, was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight pulmonary valve implantations were done in 27 patients. Thirty-day hospital mortality was 1/28 (3.6%), because of a cerebro-vascular accident. One patient died late (2.8 years postoperatively). Median age was 33 years and the median interval between primary repair and insertion of the prosthesis was 26 years. Freedom from re-operation at 1 year was 100%. One valve had to be replaced 14 years after implantation because of malfunction due to ingrowth of endomyocardial fibrosis. No thrombo-embolic events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our series do not confirm the bad reputation of mechanical valvar prostheses in the pulmonary position. On the contrary they perform well and result in a much lower re-operation rate than can be expected and in fact is reported after allograft usage. No thrombo-embolic complications were noted. In our experience pulmonary mechanical valve prostheses do well.     

Outcomes after mechanical aortic valve replacement in children and young adults with congenital heart disease

Objectives

There are little recent data on the outcomes of mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR) in children and young adults with congenital aortic valve disease. We sought to review the survival and associated thromboembolic or bleeding complications after mechanical AVR at a single center.