Clinical and imaging correlates of response to treatment with infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVES: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic disease leading to progressive spinal ankylosis and deformity. The aims of this study were to (1) determine whether infliximab is an effective treatment for AS patients who have failed conventional treatment; (2) identify any baseline clinical variables that can be associated with responsiveness to treatment; and (3) resolve whether the clinical response correlated with changes from baseline inflammatory changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Twenty-one patients who met the modified New York criteria for AS (M:F 18:3) were enrolled in this open labeled study. The mean age was 37.9+/-7.9 years and mean disease duration was 8.69+/-6.58 years. Patients received infliximab at a dose of 5 mg/kg by intravenous infusion over 2 hours at 0, 2, 6, weeks. Nine functional variables were measured [i.e., Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI) etc.], 6 clinimetrics (chest expansion, finger to floor, etc.), and inflammatory markers in the peripheral blood at baseline and each subsequent visit. Primary response to treatment was defined as a > 20% response in 5/9 functional variables. A subset of 9 consecutive patients was selected for MRI scans before and after infusions. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were available for assessment at week 14 having received 3 infusions (wks 0, 2, 6). There was > 60% improvement in functional variables, i.e., BASDAI, BASFI, Health Assessment Questionnaire, fatigue, and spinal and total body pain. Clinimetric scores selectively improved, e.g., chest expansion (p < 0.021) by 14 weeks. ESR, CRP and haptoglobin all showed significant improvement at 6 weeks and were maintained to the 14 week assessment point. Imaging studies showed improvement in all patients studied including those with advanced disease. Three patients developed headache during the infusions. Infliximab was effective in all, but degree of response varied. Very good responders were distinguished from good responders by shorter duration of disease and better baseline clinimetric scores. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab was an effective treatment for AS in a short term trial. Longterm control of symptoms and potential alteration in clinical course of disease will require longterm assessment.     

Two year maintenance of efficacy and safety of infliximab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE: To obtain results of the second year extension of an original 3 month randomised, placebo controlled trial (and the 1 year extension study) assessing the use of infliximab, a monoclonal antibody to tumour necrosis factor alpha, for the treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Of the 54 patients with AS who completed the first year of the study, 52 continued to receive infliximab 5 mg/kg every 6 weeks up to week 102. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving at least 50% improvement from baseline in the Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at week 102. Other assessments included patient and physician global assessments, quality of life as assessed by Short Form-36, Bath AS Functional Index, Bath AS Metrology Index, and C reactive protein (CRP). RESULTS: Improvement in signs and symptoms of AS seen during the first year of the study was sustained during the second year. Forty nine patients (71% of 69 enrolled patients and 49/52 (94%) patients who started year 2) completed the study up to week 102. Thirty (58%) patients achieved at least 50% improvement from baseline in the BASDAI score at week 102. Scores for other efficacy assessments were similar at weeks 54 and 102. Median CRP levels remained low at weeks 54 and 102 (3.9 and 4.3 mg/l, respectively). Side effects during the second year of the study were similar to those of the first year of treatment with infliximab. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AS treated for 2 years with infliximab 5 mg/kg exhibited a good and durable clinical response.     

Low-dose infliximab treatment for ankylosing spondylitis--clinically- and cost-effective

OBJECTIVES: Infliximab has been shown to be effective in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) when treated in a dose of 5 mg/kg at 6 weekly intervals. This dose of infliximab has not been determined by any structured randomized trials and has significant cost implications. We describe our experience of treating AS with low-dose infliximab (3mg/kg at 8 weekly intervals). The efficacy and cost implications are discussed. METHODS: Patients who had active AS [Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) > or = 4] were treated with infliximab 3 mg/kg at 0, 2, 6 weeks and thereafter at 8 weekly intervals. Response to treatment was defined as 50% improvement in BASDAI. Other response criteria such as ASAS 20, 40 and five of the six criteria were also assessed. Direct drug costs for infliximab were determined. RESULTS: Twenty-two consecutive AS patients received infliximab. All 22 completed treatment for 3 months, 15 patients for 6 months and 14 for 12 months. Mean age was 45 years (range 21-62) and mean disease duration 14.5 years (range 2-43). Of the patients, 54% achieved a 50% BASDAI response at 3 months and the benefit was sustained at 12 months in 63%. Similar response rate was seen with the other assessment criteria. Direct drug costs were significantly lower when low-dose infliximab regimen was used. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose infliximab (3 mg/kg at 8 weekly infusions) is effective in the treatment of AS. Higher doses are required in a small proportion of patients when treatment is only partially effective. Titrating the dose and frequency of infusions may be required in individual patients to achieve optimal response. Using low-dose infliximab has significant economic implications.     

Successful short term treatment of severe undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy with the anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha monoclonal antibody infliximab

OBJECTIVE: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) has been detected in sacroiliac joints of patients with spondyloarthropathies (SpA). Anti-TNF-a therapy has been efficacious in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis. Similar to these SpA subtypes, therapeutic options in undifferentiated SpA (uSpA) are also limited. We tested the efficacy of the monoclonal anti-TNF-alpha antibody infliximab in patients with active and severe uSpA in an open observation trial. METHODS: Six patients with uSpA were treated with 3 infusions of infliximab in a dosage of 3 (n = 3) or 5 mg/kg (n = 3) at Weeks 0, 2, and 6. The total observational period was 12 weeks. The Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Functional Index (BASFI), pain on a visual analog scale, the Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI), and quality of life (SF-36) were assessed before, during, and after therapy. RESULTS: Significant improvement at Day 1 after the first infusion lasting until Week 12 was reported by 5/6 patients. Improvement of > or = 50% in all activity, function, pain, and swollen joint scores was observed in the patients taking 5 mg/kg. The 3 mg/kg dose was less effective, resulting in > or = 15% improvement in outcome variables. Peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, and spinal symptoms improved equally. C-reactive protein dropped in 4 patients. Health related quality of life increased. No serious side effects or infections occurred. CONCLUSION: These observations suggest that anti-TNF-alpha therapy has significant short term efficacy in patients with severe uSpA.     

Persistent clinical response to the anti-TNF-alpha antibody infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis over 3 years

OBJECTIVE: Infliximab, a monoclonal antibody against tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), is approved in Europe for the treatment of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who have responded inadequately to conventional therapy. This report provides analyses from a 3-yr extension study, as a follow-up to both the 1- and 2-yr open label extensions of the original 3-month randomized controlled trial of infliximab in patients with AS. METHODS: Of the 49 patients with AS who completed the second year of the study, 46 continued treatment with infliximab 5 mg/kg every 6 weeks up to week 156. The Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath AS Functional Index, the Bath AS Metrology Index, patient's and physician's global assessments, quality of life (Short Form-36), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were assessed throughout the study period. RESULTS: The improvement of signs and symptoms observed in the majority of the patients during the first and second year was sustained throughout the third year of the study. Forty-three patients (62% of the 69 patients enrolled at baseline and 93% of the patients who started the third year) completed week 156. In the intention-to-treat analysis, an ASAS '5 out of 6' and ASAS 40% response was seen by 46% and 50% of the patients, respectively. The scores for other efficacy assessments were similar to the values observed at weeks 54 and 102. Median CRP levels remained low (1.5 mg/l at week 156). There were no relevant side-effects and no discontinuation because of drug-related adverse events during the third year of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AS receiving infliximab for 3 yr showed a durable clinical response without loss of efficacy. Long-term infliximab treatment was well tolerated by patients in this study.     

Long-term efficacy and safety of infliximab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: an open,observational, extension study of a three-month,randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with infliximab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody, was shown to be efficacious in patients with active disease during a 3-month treatment period. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab treatment of AS for a 1-year period. METHODS: This study was an open, observational, extension study of a 3-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. All patients who had tolerated infliximab (infliximab/infliximab group) or placebo (placebo/infliximab 12-week crossover group) therapy for 3 months entered the open extension trial (n = 65). Infliximab was administered at a dosage of 5 mg/kg every 6 weeks after the induction phase (weeks 0, 2, and 6). The primary end point was a 50% improvement in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). RESULTS: At week 54, a total of 54 of the 69 patients (78%) continued to take infliximab. The intent-to-treat primary efficacy analysis at week 54 showed that 47% of patients in the infliximab/infliximab group (95% confidence interval 31-63) and 51% of the patients in the placebo/infliximab group (95% confidence interval 36-67) achieved 50% improvement in BASDAI scores. In the analysis of those who completed the study, the mean BASDAI scores improved between weeks 0 and 54 in both treatment groups: from 6.6 to 2.4 in the infliximab/infliximab group and from 6.3 to 2.6 in the placebo/infliximab group. The dosage of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs was reduced in approximately 70% of the patients. There were significant improvements in measures of functioning, metrologic parameters, and quality of life. Between weeks 12 and 54, a total of 4 patients had serious adverse events that were possibly related to infliximab and resulted in their discontinuing the study. CONCLUSION: Infliximab therapy in AS patients resulted in a rapid and significant improvement in BASDAI scores (>50% improvement) and a durable response for 1 year. The safety profile of infliximab in AS was comparable to that observed in the postmarketing experience for the approved indications.     

Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ASSERT)

OBJECTIVE: The signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) respond inadequately to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in quite a number of patients. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors have demonstrated success in reducing AS disease activity in a limited number of clinical trials. The objective of this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with AS. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive infusions of placebo or 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, 6, 12, and 18. Efficacy was assessed using the ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) International Working Group criteria, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), night pain, patient's global assessment, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), chest expansion, the Mander enthesis index, the total swollen joint index, the C-reactive protein level, and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire. The primary end point in this study was the proportion of patients with a 20% improvement response according to the ASAS International Working Group criteria (ASAS20 responders) at week 24. RESULTS: Of the 357 patients screened, 201 were assigned to receive 5 mg/kg infliximab and 78 were assigned to receive placebo. After 24 weeks, 61.2% of patients in the infliximab group were ASAS20 responders compared with 19.2% of patients in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Clinical benefit was observed in patients receiving infliximab as early as week 2 and was maintained over the 24-week study period. Patients receiving infliximab also showed significant improvements in the BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI, chest expansion, and physical component summary score of the SF-36. Adverse events were reported by 82.2% of patients receiving infliximab and by 72.0% of patients receiving placebo; however, most adverse events in both treatment groups were mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSION: Infliximab was well tolerated and effective in a large cohort of patients with AS during a 24-week study period.     

Effectiveness of reducing infliximab dose interval in non-responder patients with refractory spondyloarthropathies. An open extension of a multicentre study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of reducing the infliximab dose interval to 6 weeks in spondyloarthropathy patients not responding to 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks. METHODS: After 30 weeks of infliximab therapy, 25 patients were classified as responders [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Activity Index (BASDAI) <4 cm or ESR <30 mm/h and CRP <5 mg/l, n = 15; group A] or non-responders (patients who did not achieve the response established for group A; n = 10; group B). Responders continued on 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks and non-responders decreased the dose interval to 6 weeks. BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), ESR, CRP and ankylosing spondylitis assessment (ASAS) criteria were used to assess response. RESULTS: At 62 weeks, 11 of 15 patients (73.3%, 95% confidence interval = 44.9-92.2%) from group A and three of 10 patients (30%, 95% confidence interval = 6.7-65.2) from group B were responders (P = 0.049). Eighty per cent (eight of 10 patients from group A) and 22.2% (two of 9 patients from group B) achieved 50% BASDAI improvement (P = 0.023), and nine of 11 patients (81.8%) and four of 10 (40%) from groups A and B, respectively, reached ASAS20 at 62 weeks (P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Patients on infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks with persistent disease activity may benefit from reducing the dose interval to 6 weeks.     

Efficacy of infliximab in refractory ankylosing spondylitis: results of a six-month open-label study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a loading regimen of the anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) antibody infliximab in predominantly axial severe ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: We enrolled in this study 50 patients (76% males, 87% HLA-B27(+), median age 35 yr, median disease duration 13 yr) with active AS [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) >or=30/100 and serum C-reactive protein concentration >or=15 mg/l) despite treatment with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and without peripheral arthritis, uveitis or active inflammatory bowel disease. Other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were discontinued >or=3 months before inclusion and were not allowed during the study. Patients received three infusions of infliximab (5 mg/kg) at weeks 0, 2 and 6 and were monitored clinically and biologically until week 24. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients completed the treatment. In intention-to-treat analysis, all parameters were significantly improved at week 2 and generally reached maximal improvement at week 8. The proportion of responders, defined by a reduction of >or=20% in the global assessment of pain (GAP) or by the AS Assessment Study Group (ASAS 20%) criteria, and the proportion of patients reaching partial remission were 98, 94 and 70% respectively. Relapse, defined as >or=50% loss of maximal GAP improvement, occurred in 73% of completers, with a median delay of 14 weeks after the third infusion. No serious adverse event related to the treatment was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms, in a large group of severely affected AS patients, the remarkable efficacy of infliximab. Relapse usually occurred after discontinuation of the drug, but almost one-third of completers were still free of relapse 4 months after the last infusion.     

Safety and efficacy of readministration of infliximab after longterm continuous therapy and withdrawal in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the safety and efficacy of the anti-tumor necrosis factor agent infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) after discontinuation of longterm therapy over 1 year and readministration, using clinical and laboratory assessments including serum levels of antibodies to infliximab (ATI). METHODS: Altogether 42/43 patients with AS in a 3-year multicenter trial discontinued therapy after continuous treatment with infliximab (5 mg/kg/6 wks). Infliximab was only readministered in case of a clinical relapse [judged by Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and physician global assessment > 4]. ATI were measured at different timepoints. The primary outcome was safety, and efficacy outcomes were secondary. RESULTS: One patient dropped out after the eighth infusion after retreatment due to repeated local infections. ATI were detected in this patient only. No other relevant adverse events were observed. One patient remained in clinical remission without therapy for more than 1 year. The other 40 patients (97.6%) were reinfused because of clinical relapse. There was no correlation between ATI and clinical measures. BASDAI 50% responses were seen in 25 (63%) and partial remission in 12 (30%) patients. The mean (+/- SD) BASDAI score dropped from 6.0 +/- 1.4 at the time of relapse to 2.6 +/- 2.0, and the median C-reactive protein from 11.2 to 1.8 mg/l after 1 year (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Readministration of infliximab after discontinuation of longterm treatment was generally safe and efficacious. Ongoing remission after discontinuation was rare. There was only one patient with relevant adverse events. ATI were detected only in this patient, but there was no correlation to clinical data. Formation of ATI seems to be rare after longterm infliximab therapy in AS.     

负荷剂量英夫利昔单抗治疗强直性脊柱炎的临床疗效及疗效预测因素分析

目的 探讨负荷剂量的抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α单克隆抗体英夫利昔单抗治疗强直性脊柱炎(AS)的临床疗效和达到临床疗效的预测因素.方法 本研究以一项2个中心的开放性Ⅱ期临床试验为基础,纳入确诊的AS患者,并且处于疾病活动期,即Bath AS疾病活动指数(BASDAI)和脊柱痛评分均≥4.患者分别在试验的第0、2、6周静脉滴注英夫利昔单抗5 mg/kg,在10周时对其临床疗效进行评估,以10周时是否达到ASAS 20,ASAS 40和BASDAI 50为疗效标准,对人口学参数[性别、年龄、病程、人类白细胞抗原(HLA)-B27阳性与否]和基线时疾病活动指标[BASDAI、脊柱炎症、脊柱痛VAS、夜间痛VAS、患者总体评估指数、BASFI、BASMI、肌腱端指数、整体关节肿胀指数、扩胸度、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和C反应蛋白(CRP)和BASRI]17个指标进行Logistic单因素和多因素疗效预测分析.结果 63例患者(男性占79%,平均年龄32岁,平均病程10年,HLA-B27阳性占90%)纳入并完成研究,第10周试验结束时,84%的患者达到ASAS 20改善;.75%的患者达到ASAS 40改善;70%的患者达到BASDAI评分改善＞50%.Logistic单因素和多因素分析显示:人口学参数和基线时疾病活动指标均未显示能预测患者的疗效.结论 英夫利昔单抗治疗AS疗效明显,基线时的人口学参数、疾病活动性的临床和实验室指标不能预测疗效.     

Six-month results of a double-blind,placebo-controlled trial of etanercept treatment in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE: There is increasing evidence that tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) is centrally involved in the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and other spondylarthritides. This study was designed to investigate the efficacy of anti-TNFalpha therapy with etanercept, a 75-kd receptor fusion protein, in active AS. METHODS: This multicenter trial had 2 phases: an initial placebo-controlled period of 6 weeks' duration and an observational phase lasting 24 weeks. Thirty patients with active AS were included. They were randomized into 2 groups, which received either etanercept (25 mg twice weekly) (n = 14) or placebo (n = 16) for 6 weeks. Then both groups were treated with etanercept. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment could be continued, but disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and steroids had to be withdrawn prior to the study. All patients received etanercept for a total of 12 weeks and were followed up for at least 24 weeks. The Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath AS Functional Index, Bath AS Metrology Index, pain level on a numeric rating scale, quality of life by the Short Form 36, and C-reactive protein (CRP) level were assessed. The primary outcome parameter was a >or=50% improvement in the BASDAI. RESULTS: Treatment with etanercept resulted in at least a 50% regression of disease activity in 57% of these patients at week 6, versus 6% of the placebo-treated patients (P = 0.004). After the placebo-treated patients switched to etanercept, 56% improved. The mean +/- SD BASDAI improved from 6.5 +/- 1.2 at baseline to 3.5 +/- 1.9 at week 6 in the etanercept group, with no improvement in the placebo group (P = 0.003 between groups). Similarly, pain, function, mobility, and quality of life improved with etanercept but not with placebo at week 6 (P < 0.05). Mean CRP levels decreased significantly with etanercept but not with placebo (P = 0.001). There was ongoing improvement in all parameters in both groups until week 12 and week 18, respectively (i.e., throughout the period of etanercept treatment). Disease relapses occurred a mean +/- SD of 6.2 +/- 3.0 weeks after cessation of etanercept. No severe adverse events, including major infections, were observed during the trial. CONCLUSION: This study shows that on a short-term basis (3 months), treatment with etanercept is clearly efficacious in patients with active AS who are receiving NSAID therapy but not DMARDs or steroids. After cessation of therapy, almost all patients experienced a relapse within a few weeks. Thus, it seems probable that etanercept must be administered continuously in most AS patients to achieve permanent inhibition of the inflammatory process.     

Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of spinal inflammation in patients treated for ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE: To compare different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based algorithms for assessment of spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) being treated with disease modifying drugs. METHODS: Eleven patients (10 men, 1 woman) who fulfilled modified New York diagnostic criteria and had severe disease [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) > 4] were given intravenous infusion of infliximab (Remicade, 5 mg/kg) for 96 weeks. Whole-spine MRI was done at 0, 24, and 54 weeks. Measurements of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal MRI Activity Score (ASspiMRI), paravertebral inflammatory lesion count (pILC), contrast:noise ratio (CNR) measurements of defined inflammatory lesions, and other scores together with C-reactive protein concentration were made at each visit. Examinations were anonymized and randomly presented twice to 2 radiologists. The significance of any changes in scores, their correlation with the BASDAI, and interobserver and intraobserver correlations were calculated. RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) BASDAI improved from 7.2 (+/- 1.5) to 1.3 (+/- 0.9) after 54 weeks (p < 0.001), and the ASspiMRI score improved from 12.0 (+/- 8.0) to 0.2 (+/- 0.5) (p < 0.001). Correlations between ASspiMRI score and BASDAI were 0.831, 0.746, and 0.369 (p < 0.001 each). The pILC improved significantly (p < 0.01). CNR showed no correlation with any clinical score. CONCLUSION:The ASspiMRI score performed best for assessment and quantification of spinal inflammation and disease activity in patients with AS, but should also quantify paravertebral inflammatory lesions, since we could show that this will significantly improve its correlation to clinical scores and increase its sensitivity to mild inflammatory processes.     

Disease activity in longstanding ankylosing spondylitis—a correlation of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings

We evaluated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with longstanding disease and investigated whether there is any relationship between MRI findings and validated methods of disease assessment. A total of 34 AS patients with disease duration greater than 10 years were included in this observational cross-sectional study (26 men, 8 women). The main outcome measures were Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global assessment (BASG), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), MRI of the thoracic and lumbar spine (AS spi MRI A) and measurement of serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), plasma viscosity (PV) and immunoglobulin A (Ig A). The median scores for the acute lesions based on AS spi MRI A scoring system was 2.5 (0–4.12). The respective mean ESR and CRP were 36 (SD, 24.00) mm/h and 14.19 (SD, 24.00) mg/l with the median PV of 1.8 (1.75–1.87). The median BASG, BASFI and BASDAI were 4.55 (2.37–5.55), 4.40(2.31–5.47) and 4.32 (3.07–6.48), respectively. No significant correlations were found between the acute MRI scores and each of the clinical instruments and laboratory markers of inflammation. In this study, majority of AS patients with longstanding disease had very low AS spi MRI A scores or no evidence of spinal inflammatory lesions. Our study would suggest that MRI should be used along with other measures of disease activity in the assessment of symptomatic AS patients with longstanding disease.     

Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Results of a randomized,placebo‐controlled trial (ASSERT)

Objective

The signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) respond inadequately to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, and disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs in quite a number of patients. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors have demonstrated success in reducing AS disease activity in a limited number of clinical trials. The objective of this multicenter, randomized, placebo‐controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with AS.

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned to receive infusions of placebo or 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, 6, 12, and 18. Efficacy was assessed using the ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) International Working Group criteria, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), night pain, patient's global assessment, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), chest expansion, the Mander enthesis index, the total swollen joint index, the C‐reactive protein level, and the Short Form 36 (SF‐36) health survey questionnaire. The primary end point in this study was the proportion of patients with a 20% improvement response according to the ASAS International Working Group criteria (ASAS20 responders) at week 24.

Results

Of the 357 patients screened, 201 were assigned to receive 5 mg/kg infliximab and 78 were assigned to receive placebo. After 24 weeks, 61.2% of patients in the infliximab group were ASAS20 responders compared with 19.2% of patients in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Clinical benefit was observed in patients receiving infliximab as early as week 2 and was maintained over the 24‐week study period. Patients receiving infliximab also showed significant improvements in the BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI, chest expansion, and physical component summary score of the SF‐36. Adverse events were reported by 82.2% of patients receiving infliximab and by 72.0% of patients receiving placebo; however, most adverse events in both treatment groups were mild or moderate in severity.

Conclusion

Infliximab was well tolerated and effective in a large cohort of patients with AS during a 24‐week study period.

     

Efficacy of anakinra in active ankylosing spondylitis: a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of anakinra, an interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in active ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and to investigate the effect of anakinra treatment on spinal enthesitis/osteitis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: A 3 month open label study of anakinra (100 mg subcutaneous injection daily) was carried out in nine patients with active AS who had back pain and an increased acute phase response, and who had failed to respond to at least one non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Clinical assessment included the Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and AS Quality of Life (ASQoL) before and after treatment. Fat suppressed MRI of the spine and sacroiliac joints was performed with a 1.5 T scanner at baseline and at 3 months to determine the effect of treatment on spinal enthesitis/osteitis. RESULTS: Significant improvement was found in the BASFI (median baseline 5.88, 3 months 3.63, p = 0.021), BASDAI (median baseline 5.63, 3 months 3.48, p = 0.028), ASQoL (median baseline 12, 3 months 8, p = 0.011) and laboratory measures reflecting inflammation, with C reactive protein (median baseline 31 mg/l, 3 months 17 mg/l, p = 0.036) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (median baseline 19 mm/1st h, 3 months 15 mm/1st h, p = 0.008) also showing significant improvement. Six patients (67%) achieved the Assessments in AS (ASAS) Working Group criteria of 20% improvement. Of the 38 regions of enthesitis/osteitis determined by MRI at baseline, 23 (61%) either improved or regressed completely. CONCLUSIONS: This open label pilot study suggests that anakinra is effective in controlling the clinical manifestations of AS. The clinical response was reflected by an improvement in MRI determined spinal enthesitis/osteitis.     

抗肿瘤坏死因子α单克隆抗体治疗强直性脊柱炎的短期临床观察

目的评价负荷剂量的抗肿瘤坏死因子α单克隆抗体infliximab治疗强直性脊柱炎（AS）的临床疗效和安全性。方法本研究为2个中心的开放性Ⅱ期临床试验,患者为确诊的AS患者,并且疾病处于活动期。患者分别在试验的第0、2、6周接受静脉输注infliximab5mg／kg,并随访至10周,主要疗效指标为达到AS疗效评价标准20（ASAS20）的患者比例,次要疗效指标包括达到临床显效的患者比例,与基线值相比BathAS疾病活动指数（BASDAI）、BathAS功能指数、BathAS测量指数、脊柱痛、夜间痛、脊柱炎症、病人总体评估指数、肌腱端炎指数、整体关节肿胀指数、生活质量健康问卷SF-36改善的状况。结果63例患者（男性占79％,平均年龄32岁,平均病程10年,HLA-B27阳性占90％）纳入研究,第10周试验结束时,84％的患者达到ASAS20的改善程度;有30％的患者达到临床显效标准;70％的患者达到BASDAI评分改善大于50％,54％的患者达到BASDAI评分改善大于70％。其他各项疗效指标也反映出相似的改善程度及趋势。最常见的不良反应为上呼吸道感染和皮肤及其附属器官的损害,其次是肝功能异常,2例患者发生严重的皮炎伴有脱发,1例患者在第3次输注药物过程中因出现输注反应而停药。近期随访结果显示,疗效可持续2～8个月,停止治疗后无新的不良反应发生。结论负荷剂量infliximab的安全性和耐受性好,能迅速减轻AS的症状和体征,并可改善AS患者的功能、活动范围和生活质量。     

Clinical and imaging efficacy of infliximab in HLA–B27–Positive patients with magnetic resonance imaging–determined early sacroiliitis

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of infliximab in HLA–B27–positive patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–determined early sacroiliitis, using both clinical and MRI assessments.

Methods

Forty patients with recent‐onset inflammatory back pain, as assessed by the Calin criteria, HLA–B27 positivity, clinical disease activity as measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), pain and morning stiffness, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–determined sacroiliac joint bone edema were randomized in a double‐blind manner to receive infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo at 0, 2, 6, and 12 weeks. MRI scans were performed at baseline and 16 weeks and scored by 2 observers (blinded to both the order of the scans and to treatment group), using the Leeds scoring system. Clinical assessments included the BASDAI, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) instrument, the ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Working Group criteria (ASAS) for improvement, and markers of inflammation.

Results

The mean reduction in the total MRI score from week 0 to week 16 was significantly greater in infliximab‐treated patients compared with placebo‐treated patients (P = 0.033). On average, significantly more lesions resolved in the infliximab group (P < 0.001), while significantly more new lesions developed in the placebo group (P = 0.004). Significantly greater improvement in the infliximab group versus the placebo group was also observed for changes from week 0 to week 16 in the BASDAI (P = 0.002), BASFI (P = 0.004), and ASQoL (P = 0.007) scores. Responses according to the ASAS criteria for 40% improvement, the ASAS criteria for 20% improvement in 5 of 6 domains, and ASAS partial remission were achieved by 61%, 44%, and 56% of infliximab‐treated patients, respectively. Infliximab was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

Infliximab was an effective therapy for early sacroiliitis, providing a reduction in disease activity by week 16. This study is the first to show that infliximab is effective for reducing clinical and imaging evidence of disease activity in patients with MRI‐determined early axial spondylarthritis.

     

Infliximab improves productivity and reduces workday loss in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether clinical benefits observed after treatment with infliximab were accompanied by improvement in productivity and reduction in time lost from work in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Adults with active AS receiving standard antiinflammatory treatment were randomly assigned in a 3:8 ratio to receive infusions of placebo or 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 6 weeks thereafter through week 24. Physical function was measured using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. The impact of disease on productivity was measured using a visual analog scale (range 0-10). Self-reported employment status and time lost at work before and during the trial were collected. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to examine factors associated with productivity. RESULTS: Patients treated with infliximab had a more significant reduction in limitations of work and daily activity due to physical or emotional problems than patients treated with placebo. Of the subset of patients employed full time, patients in the infliximab group had a significantly greater improvement in productivity as early as week 6 compared with the placebo group. The median change from baseline in the productivity score at week 24 was 0.7 (median percent change 11%) in the placebo group compared with 2.1 (62%) in the infliximab group (P < 0.05). Daily productivity was significantly correlated with physical function and disease activity at baseline and week 24. CONCLUSION: The daily productivity of patients with active AS was significantly associated with functional impairment and disease activity. Infliximab treatment significantly improved productivity and reduced workday loss among employed patients with AS.     

Persistent clinical response of infliximab treatment,over a 4-year period in ankylosing spondylitis

Our aim was to investigate the efficacy, toxicity, and drug discontinuation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with infliximab. Thirty-five patients with AS, who were enrolled between June 2001 and December 2002 were treated with infliximab. All patients fulfilled the New York revised criteria for AS and had axial disease. Infliximab (5 mg/kg weight), was given intravenously at weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter. If this failed to give an acceptable treatment response, the interval was shortened to 6 or 4 weeks. The patients were followed-up at predefined times according to a standardized protocol. Data concerning infliximab efficacy, tolerability, adverse events, interval, and drug discontinuation were all recorded. Clinical improvement according to the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50% and the Ankylosing Spondylitis Assessment Study group (ASAS) 40%, and ASAS 5/6 response criteria were recorded. Infliximab treatment resulted in a rapid improvement in the BASDAI and ASAS scores in the first year of the treatment, which sustained throughout the fourth year. More specifically, after the third year of treatment 17/35 (48.6%) of patients achieved BASDAI 50% response criteria, 19/35 (54.3%) attained the ASAS 40% and 15/35 (42.9%) reached the ASAS 5/6. After the fourth year of treatment BASDAI 50% was reached by 17/35 (48.6%) of patients, ASAS 40% by 17/35 (48.6%), while ASAS 5/6 was attained by 15/35 (42.9%). The clinical improvement was associated with the reduction of acute phase reactants as measured by C-reactive protein levels. After the first year of treatment, the “survival rate” of infliximab was 94.3%, after the second year was 91.4%, after the third year was 85.7% and even after 4 years of treatment still maintained high 77.9%. Six (17.1%) patients were withdrawn during the observational period. Three because of lack of efficacy, two because of allergic reactions and one lost from follow-up. Infliximab was effective, safe, and well tolerated in patients with AS. The clinical response was maintained for a period of 4 years and over, with infliximab survival of 77.9%.