Open mitral commissurotomy in the current era: indications,technique, and results

BACKGROUND: The present retrospective study is focused on indications, techniques, and results of open mitral commisurotomy in the current era. METHODS: Of the 1,280 patients undergoing open-heart surgical procedures for rheumatic mitral stenosis between January 1990 and July 2000, 276 (21.6%) patients underwent open mitral commissurotomy. Major indications included presence of left atrial thrombus/clot (n = 82, 29.7%), severe subvalvular disease (n = 110, 39.8%), mitral valve calcification (n = 42, 15.2%), mild mitral regurgitation (n = 28, 10.0%), associated aortic valve disease (n = 55, 19.9%), organic tricuspid valve disease (n = 20, 7.2%), and failure or restenosis after closed or balloon mitral valvuloplasty (n = 55, 19.9%). Age of patients ranged from 7 to 67 years (mean, 30.2 +/- 12 years). The majority (76%) were in New York Heart Association class III or IV, and 6.9% were in congestive heart failure. Atrial fibrillation was present in 134 (48.6%) patients. Mitral valve area ranged from 0.3 to 0.7 cm2 (mean, 0.52 +/- 0.12 cm2). Mid-diastolic gradients across the mitral valve ranged from 8 to 34 mm Hg (mean, 14.5 +/- 6.2 mm Hg), and end-diastolic gradients ranged from 8 to 42 mm Hg (mean, 15.2 +/- 5.7 mm Hg). Open mitral commissurotomy was performed using standard cardiopulmonary bypass. Associated aortic valve procedure was performed in 55 patients, and either tricuspid valvotomy or repair was performed in 28 patients. RESULTS: There were four early deaths. All these patients had associated aortic valve procedure (Ross procedure in 2 and homograft aortic valve replacement in 2). Three patients developed severe mitral regurgitation in early postoperative period (< or = 30 days) and required reoperation. Predischarge echocardiography showed mitral valve area from 1.4 to 3.5 cm2 (mean, 2.6 +/- 0.6cm2) and moderate mitral regurgitation in 4 patients. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 130 months (mean, 64.5 +/- 28.6 months). There was no late death. There were three reoperations for mitral valve failure, and an additional 2 patients developed severe mitral stenosis (mitral valve area < 1.0 cm2). In operative survivors, freedom from mitral valve failure at 10 years was 87.0% +/- 3.5%. In patients with isolated open mitral commissurotomy, the incidence of thromboembolism was 0.5%/patient-year. CONCLUSIONS: Open mitral commissurotomy provides excellent early and long-term results in a selected group of patients.     

Aortic Valve Replacement with Biological Substitute

Abstract In the quest for an ideal aortic valve substitute, homografts and autografts are well-established options. We reviewed our results with homografts and autografts for aortic valve replacement during the last 5 years. From March 1992 through July 1997,189 patients (138 male and 51 female), age 8 months to 68 years (mean 31.0 2 4.2 years), underwent aortic valve replacement with a human biological substitute. Of these, 93 patients received a cryopreserved or antibiotic-preserved aortic/pulmonary homograft, whereas 96 patients underwent a Ross procedure. Etiology was rheumatic in 143 (75.6%) patients, bicuspid aortic valve in 40 (21.2%, Marfan's disease in 5 (2.6%), and myxomatous aortitis in 1 (0.5%). Among the homograft group, a scalloped subcoronary implantation technique was used in 54 patients, whereas 32 patients underwent root replacement. Five patients required aortic root and ascending aortia replacement for annuloaortic ectasia. In all patients undergoing the Ross procedure, a root replacement technique was used. Operative mortality was 7.4% (14 patients). Late mortality was 5.3% (10 patients). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 46 months postoperatively. In patients with homograft aortic valve replacement, 76 patients (91.5%) had trivial to mild aortic regurgitation, while 7 patients (8.4%) had important aortic regurgitation. In patients with the Ross procedure, 78 patients (89.6%) had trivial to mild regurgitation. Moderate to severe aortic regurgitation was present in 9 patients (10.3%). all of whom had rheumatic heart disease and were young (< 30 years at surgery). We conclude that homografts and autografts provide an excellent substitute for the diseased aortic valve. Young age (< 30 years) with rheumatic etiology is a major risk factor for early progressive aortic regurgitation in patients undergoing the Ross procedure.( J Card Surg 1998;13:1–8)     

Mitral valve repair in children with rheumatic heart disease

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term results of mitral valve repair in children with chronic rheumatic heart disease. METHODS: From January 1988 through December 2003, 278 children (153 male children) underwent mitral valve repair. Mean age was 11.7 +/- 2.9 years (range, 2-15 years). One hundred seventy-three children (62%) were in the New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. Congestive heart failure was present in 24 (8.6%). Reparative procedures included posterior collar annuloplasty (n = 242), commissurotomy (n = 187), cusp-level chordal shortening (n = 94), cusp thinning (n = 71), cleft suture (n = 65), and cusp excision or plication (n = 10). Associated procedures included atrial septal defect closure (n = 22), aortic valve repair/replacement (n = 13), and tricuspid valve repair (n = 3). RESULTS: Early mortality was 2.2% (6 patients). Preoperative left ventricular dysfunction was associated with greater mortality. Median follow-up was 56.5 months (mean, 58.9. +/- 32.3 months; range, 5 to 180 months). One hundred seventy-seven survivors (65%) had no or trivial mitral regurgitation. Sixteen patients (6%) required reoperation for valve dysfunction. There were 7 late deaths (2.6%). Actuarial, reoperation-free, and event-free survivals at a median follow-up of 56.5 months were 95.2% +/- 1.5%, 91.6% +/- 2.2%, and 55.9% +/- 3.5%, respectively; at 15 years, they were 95.2% +/- 1.5%, 85.9% +/- 5.9%, and 46.7% +/- 4.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Mitral valve repair in children with chronic rheumatic heart disease is feasible and provides acceptable long-term results.     

Homograft mitral valve replacement: five years' results

OBJECTIVE: Results of mitral valve replacement with a mitral homograft were evaluated at 5 years to assess the suitability of the procedure. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (25 male subjects) aged 10 to 49 years (mean, 32 +/- 10 years) with rheumatic mitral valve disease underwent total (n = 35) or partial (n = 2) mitral valve replacement with a fresh antibiotic-preserved (n = 23) or cryopreserved (n = 14) mitral homograft. The predominant lesion was mitral stenosis (n = 30). RESULTS: There were 5 early deaths. Operative survivors were followed up for 1 to 60 months (mean, 26.6 +/- 12 months). Among these, 21 patients had severe mitral regurgitation during the follow-up period; 3 died and 8 underwent reoperation. The homograft failure rate was not affected by preoperative physiologic lesion (stenosis vs regurgitation, P =.4), type of homograft (antibiotic-preserved vs cryopreserved homograft, P =.9), papillary muscle pretreatment (yes vs no, P =.9), or addition of posterior collar annuloplasty (yes vs no, P =.2). Among the remaining patients, 5 had moderate mitral regurgitation, 4 had either trivial or mild mitral regurgitation, and 2 were lost to follow-up. Study of the explanted mitral homografts (n = 8) revealed that disruption of one of the donor papillary muscles was responsible for early failures (n = 2), whereas cuspal and chordal degeneration was responsible for late failures (n = 6). Microscopically, the explanted valve lacked any viable cellular elements, and there was no evidence of immunologic injury to the homografts. CONCLUSION: The mitral homograft did not fulfill our expectations as a suitable substitute for the diseased mitral valve.     

Comprehensive experience with the Ross operation in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: Although the first pulmonary autograft operations were performed in Spain in 1991, this procedure has gained substantial interest and has been consolidated since 1997. The establishment of the Spanish Registry of the Ross Operation pretends to evaluate the results of this option in aortic valve disease patients in our setting. METHODS: In a yearly fashion, the cardiac surgery departments in Spain currently performing this intervention send data from new patients or follow-ups to the reference center. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data are included in the registry, with special attention to morbidity, mortality, autograft and homograft dysfunction and need for reintervention. RESULTS: Since February 1991 to May 2002, 169 patients have been treated with this technique. The most prevalent aortic disease was regurgitation (72; 42.59%), congenital being the most frequent etiology (108; 63.9%). Four (2.36%) patients required intraoperative aortic counterpulsation. Operative mortality was 2.36% (n=4). Follow-up is 98.7% complete, with an average of 36.08+/-31.09 months (range 1-135), 84 patients (49.7%) were followed for more than 2 years. The autograft remains competent or with trivial to mild regurgitation in 161 patients (95.6%), presenting two (1.18%) with severe regurgitation. The homograft was normal or with mild stenosis in 159 patients (94.07%), presenting five (2.95%) with severe stenosis. Three (1.77%) required reintervention (surgical or interventional) on the right ventricular outflow tract and four (2.36%) required autograft replacement for a mechanical prosthesis. Actuarial survival is 95.99+/-1.65% at 36 months, remaining 92.44+/-2.55% free from reintervention in the same period. CONCLUSIONS: The Ross operation is an increasingly popular surgical option in Spain, and although the number of patients and length of follow-up are still limited, initial results are at least as good as those reported internationally. It is important to continue a close follow-up of these patients to assess the long-term function of auto and homograft. With the available data, we believe that this therapeutic approach is a valid option for selected groups of patients with surgical aortic valve disease in Spain.     

Aortic pulmonary autograft implant: medium-term follow-up with a note on a new right ventricular pulmonary artery conduit

BACKGROUND: The Ross operation has been applied to various aortic valve pathologies, particularly when somatic growth is an issue. However, associated cardiac disease and technical problems may limit its use with regard to associated procedures and issues of right ventricular outflow reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From December 1992 to March 1998, 24 patients underwent aortic pulmonary autograft implantation. There were 14 males and 10 females, 15+/-10 years of age (mean +/- SD) (range 1 to 50 years), weighing 42.8+/-20 kg (mean +/- SD) (range 8 to 78 kg). Aortic insufficiency was present in 15 (62.5%) patients, stenosis in 8 (33.3%) patients, and valvar stenosis associated with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in 1 (4.1%) patient. Etiology was rheumatic in 17 patients and congenital in 7. The Ross procedure was accompanied by a partial-Konno left ventricular outflow enlargement in one patient, and mitral valve annuloplasty, mitral commissurotomy, and tricuspid valve replacement in three other patients, respectively. The right ventricular outflow was reconstructed with a valved pulmonary homograft in 14 patients and with a Shelhigh No-React porcine pulmonary conduit in 10 patients. Evaluation was done by New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class and by echocardiography at a follow-up of 22.8+/-24 months (mean +/- SD) (range 3 to 63 months). RESULTS: There were no operative mortalities and no postoperative arrhythmias. One (4.1%) patient required intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support for 3 days, one (4.1%) patient died 2 years later of probable arrhythmia, and one (4.1%) patient required mechanical aortic valve replacement 2 years later for severe autograft insufficiency. Left ventricular ejection fraction was unchanged (preoperative 62.4%+/-30%, postoperative 64.2%+/-30% [mean +/- SD], [p = NS]) and no significant gradient was documented by echocardiographic Doppler in the right and left ventricular outflow tracts. The aortic insufficiency scale decreased from a mean of 3.9+/-0.2 to a mean of 1+/-0 (p < 0.01). NYHA Class decreased to I in all patients, from III (10) and II (14). CONCLUSIONS: The pulmonary autograft in the aortic position is suitable for aortic valve replacement in pediatric and adult patients with good medium-term results and in patients with rheumatic etiology, and it provides a desirable solution in the presence of associated pathologies, such as left ventricular tract obstruction or associated multivalvular disease. The development of new means of right ventricular outflow reconstruction must parallel the progress achieved for the left side.     

An experience with the Ross operation utilizing cryopreserved pulmonary homografts procured by and stored in our homograft valve bank

Eight patients, 4 males and 4 females ranging in age from 10 to 54 years (mean 27 +/- 13 years) underwent the Ross operation using a cryopreserved pulmonary homograft harvested by and cryopreserved in our institutional "Tissue Bank". Seven patients had a congenital bicuspid aortic valve and 3 patients had had healed infective endocarditis of the aortic valve. Four young female patients wanted to have a baby after operation. The Ross procedure was carried out utilizing aortic root replacement techniques in all patients. All patients survived and are currently in NYHA class 1, but 2 cardiac events occurred in 2 patients during the mean follow-up term of 29 +/- 19 months. The one was the anastomic stenosis between the homograft and distal pulmonary artery treated by balloon dilatation and the other was ventricular tachycardia eventually managed by the insertion of an ICD. Pulmonary autograft valve regurgitation is present in 3 patients, but it is not progressive up to the present time. Pulmonary homograft valves function well in all patients. The Ross operation for adolescents and young adults should become more popular along with more easy availability of homograft valves based upon the establishment of the "Homograft Valve Bank" system in Japan.     

Homograft replacement of the mitral valve: eight-year results

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess whether the mitral homograft represents a valuable alternative for complete or partial mitral valve replacement. METHODS: Since 1993, 104 patients underwent mitral homograft replacement surgery. The mean age was 38 +/- 15 years. The causes of mitral valve disease were rheumatic disease (n = 76), infective endocarditis (n = 24), and others (n = 4). Sixty-five of these procedures were total homografts, and 39 were partial homografts. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 52 +/- 35 months (maximum, 117 months). Overall hospital mortality was 4 (3.8%) of 104 patients and 2.5% versus 8.7% for patients without endocarditis and with endocarditis, respectively (P <.19). There were 9 late deaths (cardiac, 4; noncardiac, 5). There have been 5 early (<3 months) and 10 late reoperations. Of the remaining 77 patients, New York Heart Association class was I in 61, II in 14, and III in 2. Four patients had endocarditis, and 5 had an ischemic or hemorrhagic event. Freedom from major cardiac events was 71% +/- 6% at 8 years (partial at 81% vs total at 63%, P <.19). Among patients with a total homograft, freedom from major cardiac events was 61% +/- 9% and 85% +/- 8% at 6 years in patients younger than and older than 40 years, respectively (P =.09). CONCLUSION: The risk of early dysfunction related to a mismatch between the mitral homograft and the patient's valve is the main pitfall of the technique. Beyond that stage, the results were comparable with those of bioprostheses in a cohort of young patients.     

Reoperations in valvular heart disease

Background Reoperations for valvular heart disease are associated with a higher overall mortality than the primary operations. In this retrospective analysis, we present our experience of reoperative valvular heart surgery over a period of 25 years. Methods From January 1975 to July 2000, 13039 operations were performed for valvular heart disease. Of these 665 were reoperations. The mean age of the patients at the primary operation was 24.0±10.2 years (range: 8 to 65 years) and at re-operation was 35.6±11.6 years (range: 9 to 65 years) with an interval of 9.4±2.2 years (range: 0.2 to 25 years) between the 2 procedures. Four hundred and forty reoperations were performed following a previous closed mitral valvotomy and procedures included, redo closed mitral valvotomy (n=28), mitral valve replacement (n=30), open mitral commissurotomy (n=51), mitral valve repair (n=9), homograft mitral valve replacement (n=2), double valve replacement (n=47), aortic valve replacement (n=2) and homograft aortic valve replacement plus open mitral commissurotomy (n=l). Eighty six patients underwent reoperations following mitral valve replacement. Valve thrombosis (n=50) and endocarditis (n=10) were principle causes of reoperation. Forty three patients required reoperation following failed mitral valve repair, 19 following open mitral commissurotomy and 8 following homograft mitral valve replacement. Sixty five patients underwent reoperation following aortic valve operations: prosthetic aortic valve replacement in 43, homograft aortic valve replacement in 5, aortic valve repair in 10, and Ross procedure in 7. Results Majority of patients were operated through midsternotomy. Aortic cannulation was possible in all but 4 patients in whom femoral artery cannulation was required. Operative mortality following reoperations was 7.5% (n=50). Peri-operative bleeding, low cardiac output and infective endocarditis were major causes of operative deaths. Other post-operative complications included cerebrovascular accident (n=3), acute renal failure (n=10) and jaundice (n=25). Fifteen patients developed significant wound infection. Conclusions Patients undergoing operation for valvular heart disease frequently require reoperation. Reoperative valvular heart surgery is safe and can be undertaken with acceptable mortality and morbidity.     

Midterm results of total aortic root replacement with pulmonary autograft (Ross operation)

Between February 1995 and December 1999, 18 patients underwent Ross operation. Age at the operation ranged from 2 to 31 years. Diagnosis includes congenital aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation in 15, and adult aortic regurgitation in 3. In all cases autograft was implanted by the method of total aortic root replacement, associated with annuloplasty for the dilated aortic annulus in 2 and aortoventriculotomy by the Konno procedure in 3 (Ross-Konno). Right ventricular outflow tract was reconstructed by a pulmonary homograft in 12, a xenopericardial conduit in 3, or the other reconstructive procedures with autologous tissue and outflow patch in 3. There was no operative and late death. Reoperation was needed in 1 patient due to stenosis of pericardial conduit 4 years after the initial operation. Pressure gradient across implanted autograft valve was negligible (4.8 +/- 0.5 mmHg), and echocardiography revealed no aortic regurgitation in 12 cases and trivial to mild in 6, over a mean follow-up period of 23 +/- 18 months (range 2 to 60 months), signifying excellent durability of implanted autograft. Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with the homograft resulted in excellent mid-term performance as showing pressure gradient of 9.0 +/- 4.6 mmHg and no regurgitation in 11 of 12 cases, whereas pressure gradient was 17.9 +/- 13.1 mmHg in the patients underwent the other reconstructive procedures. We conclude that Ross procedure associated with the concomitant procedures to adjust the size discrepancy between the native aortic annulus and autograft has provided good midterm results with excellent autograft durability. And this procedure was thought to be a preferable method for children as well as young adults with congenital aortic stenosis.     

Successful management of early aortic root abscess with aortic homograft implantation in children after Ross operation

The Ross operation is the best surgical procedure for aortic valve replacement in children of all age groups. A 3.5 years old boy developed early autograft endocarditis (9 days) following a straightforward Ross operation. Due to progressive neo-aortic valve destruction and aortic root abscess extending to the mitral annulus and valve, the pulmonary autograft had to be removed. A cryopreserved aortic homograft with its attached mitral valve leaflet was used to reconstruct the left ventricular outflow tract and repair the native mitral valve defect.     

Semilunar valve switch procedure: autotransplantation of the native aortic valve to the pulmonary position in the Ross procedure

BACKGROUND: The Ross procedure has gained wide acceptance in young patients with aortic valve disease. The durability of the pulmonary autograft in the aortic position has been proved, with up to 24 years of follow-up. The homograft pulmonary valve, however, has limited longevity. To circumvent this problem we harvested, repaired, and reimplanted the native aortic valve with intact commissures in the pulmonary position in 13 patients undergoing the Ross procedure for aortic insufficiency. METHODS: The cause of aortic insufficiency was rheumatic in 6 patients, congenital in 4, post-aortic valvotomy in 2, and bacterial endocarditis in 1. Patient age ranged from 5 to 45 years (mean, 17+/-9 years). Root replacement technique with coronary artery reimplantation was used. In the first 4 patients, the native aortic valve was sutured into the right ventricular outflow tract, and a polytetrafluorethylene patch was used to reconstruct the main pulmonary artery. In the last 9 patients, the aortic valve and polytetrafluorethylene patch were made into a conduit by another surgeon while the left-sided reconstruction was performed. RESULTS: All patients had marked reduction of left ventricular dilation and good function of the reimplanted native aortic valve, with up to 50 months of follow-up (mean, 29.9+/-14.2 months; range, 12 to 50 months). Two patients died 15 and 26 days, respectively, of a false aneurysm rupture at the distal aortic anastomosis. In the remaining 11 patients, 9 (82%) had mild or absent, and 2 (18%) had mild to moderate, neoaortic valve regurgitation. Similarly, 9 patients (82%) had mild or absent, and 2 (18%) had mild to moderate, neopulmonary valve regurgitation. Mild neopulmonary valve stenosis was present in 6 patients (54%) (mean gradient, 29+/-4 mm Hg; range, 25 to 35 mm Hg). All surviving patients are in functional New York Heart Association functional class I. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that use of the native aortic valve with the Ross procedure makes the procedure attractive and potentially curative. The diseased aortic valve works well in the pulmonary position because of lower pressure and resistance. The valve leaflets should remain viable and grow in both the pulmonary and aortic positions because they derive nutrition directly from the blood.     

Fate of mild aortic valve disease after mitral valve intervention

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to assess the long-term outcome of untreated mild aortic valve disease present at the time of initial mitral valve intervention. METHODS: A total of 284 patients with rheumatic heart disease aged 7 to 62 years (mean, 23.5 +/- 12.2 years) who underwent mitral valve intervention and had mild aortic valve disease initially were followed up for 2 to 18 years (mean, 10.8 +/- 3.7 years). At initial intervention, 232 patients had pure mild aortic regurgitation, and 52 patients had mild aortic stenosis with or without aortic regurgitation. RESULTS: Among patients with mild aortic regurgitation initially, 11 (5%) patients progressed to moderate (n = 6) or severe (n = 5) regurgitation over an interval of 9 to 17 years (mean, 12.1 +/- 2.8 years), and 1 patient had moderate aortic stenosis and severe aortic regurgitation after 10 years. Freedom from development of moderate-severe aortic valve disease in patients who initially had mild aortic regurgitation was 100%, 97.0% +/- 1.7%, and 87.4% +/- 4.6% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Seventeen (35%) patients with initial mild aortic stenosis (with or without regurgitation) had moderate or severe stenosis (with or without moderate-severe regurgitation) after an interval of 4.9 +/- 3.8 years. Freedom from development of moderate-severe aortic valve disease in patients who initially had mild aortic stenosis was 75.6% +/- 6.2%, 61.5% +/- 8.5%, and 46.1% +/- 11.2% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Ten patients required aortic valve replacement for aortic valve dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Mild aortic regurgitation present at the time of mitral valve intervention progresses very slowly and less frequently requires reintervention. However, mild aortic stenosis diagnosed initially progresses more often and more rapidly and thus needs closer follow-up.     

Mitral valve repair with aortic valve replacement is superior to double valve replacement

OBJECTIVES: Double valve replacement has been advocated for patients with combined aortic and mitral valve disease. This study investigated the alternative that, when feasible, mitral valve repair with aortic valve replacement is superior. Patients and Methods: From 1975 to 1998, 813 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with either mitral valve replacement (n = 518) or mitral valve repair (n = 295). Mitral valve disease was rheumatic in 71% and degenerative in 20%. Mitral valve replacement was more common in patients with severe mitral stenosis (P =.0009), atrial fibrillation (P =.0006), and in patients receiving a mechanical aortic prosthesis (P =.0002). These differences were used for propensity-matched multivariable comparisons. Follow-up extended reliably to 16 years, mean 6.9 +/- 5.9 years. RESULTS: Hospital mortality rate was 5.4% for mitral valve repair and 7.0% for replacement (P =.4). Survivals at 5, 10, and 15 years were 79%, 63%, and 46%, respectively, after mitral valve repair versus 72%, 52%, and 34%, respectively, after replacement (P =.01). Late survival was increased by mitral valve repair rather than replacement (P =.03) in all subsets of patients, including those with severe mitral valve stenosis. After repair of nonrheumatic mitral valves, 5-, 10-, and 15-year freedom from valve replacement was 91%, 88%, and 86%, respectively; in contrast, after repair of rheumatic valves, it was 97%, 89%, and 75% at these intervals. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with double valve disease, aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair (1) are feasible in many, (2) improve late survival rates, and (3) are the preferred strategy when mitral valve repair is possible.     

Triple valve repair for young rheumatic patients.

BACKGROUND: Facing young foreign polyvalvular rheumatic patients, for which long-term anticoagulation is not available, we have chosen to attempt triple valve repair procedures in order to avoid prosthetic implantation in this particular population suffering from triple valve disease. METHODS: Twenty-one young rheumatic patients (mean age:11+/-4 years) underwent triple valve repair procedures including cusp extension on the aortic valve aortic between September, 1992 and December, 2000. Valvular pathology characteristics according to Carpentier's classification included mitral insufficiency type III post+II ant (n=10), type III post (n=4), type II ant (n=2), mitral stenosis (n=5), type III aortic insufficiency (n=21), type I (n=13) and type III (n=8) tricuspid insufficiency. RESULTS: Firstly, the mitral valve disease were corrected using Carpentier's techniques of repair: prosthetic ring annuloplasty (n=16), commissurotomy (n=12), chord transposition (n=11) or shortening (n=4), papillary muscle sliding plasty (n=4) and pericardial patch leaflet enlargement (n=6). Secondly, aortic lesions were corrected using glutaraldehyde stabilized autologous pericardium triple cusps extension technique (n=21). Lastly, tricuspid repairs were always performed on beating hearts using commissurotomy (n=8), prosthetic ring (n=12) or other techniques (n=9) of annuloplasty. The operative mortality was 4.7% (one patient died). Echocardiograms before discharge showed grade I mitral insufficiency in seven patients and grade I aortic insufficiency in five patients. There was no late death during a mean follow-up of 51+/-31 months. Two patients underwent valvular redo surgery because of aortic and mitral plasty deterioration due to rheumatic disease progress. After 5 years, 90% of the patients were free from redo valvular surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In rheumatic patients, autologous pericardial patch extension of the aortic valve permitted widespread use of reconstructive surgery even in patients suffering from triple valve disease. Triple valve repair, in this particular challenging setting of patients, has provided satisfactory initial and mid-term results and could be considered as an interesting palliative surgical approach.     

Early and late results of mitral valve repair for mitral valve regurgitation. Significant risk factors of reoperation

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve repair for mitral valve regurgitation has many advantages over mitral valve replacement. However, durability and reoperation after mitral valve repair still remain major problems. We examined the outcome of mitral valve repair for mitral valve regurgitation and analyzed several pre- and intraoperative potential risk factors to determine the significant risk factors of reoperation. METHODS: From February 1981 to November 1996, 86 patients underwent mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation or combined mitral regurgitation and stenosis. The mean age was 53 years, and 88.4% were New York Heart Association class III or IV. The causes of mitral valve disease were degenerative disease in 53 patients, rheumatic disease in 15, infective endocarditis in 11, and ischemic disease in 7. There were 2 early and 8 late deaths. RESULTS: Actuarial overall survival including early death at 10 years was 83.2+/-6.1%, freedom from reoperation was 86.8+/-5.3%, freedom from thromboembolism was 90.9+/-6.2%, and freedom from infective endocarditis was 98.5+/-1.5%. There was no bleeding event. At the last follow-up, most patients were in New York Heart Association class I or II. Prolapse of anterior leaflet and rheumatic mitral regurgitation were identified as independent predictors for reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: The repair techniques for anterior leaflet prolapse and patient selection in rheumatic mitral disease are important for improving long-term results of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation.     

The Ross procedure is the procedure of choice for congenital aortic valve disease

OBJECTIVES: The Ross procedure has emerged as an attractive option for aortic valve replacement in children and young adults. Our objective was to review our experience with the Ross procedure in young patients with congenital aortic valve disease. We also sought for evidence of growth in the autograft. METHODS: From January 1990 to July 2000, 260 patients underwent the Ross procedure for various aortic valve diseases. There were 136 patients less than 18 years of age. Fifty-three (38%) of these patients had congenital aortic valve disease. Ages ranged from 3 months to 18 years (mean, 8 plus minus 5 years; median, 9 years). Ten patients were less than 2 years of age. Pure aortic stenosis was present in 18 patients, mixed stenosis and regurgitation in 32, and pure aortic regurgitation in 3. The aortic valve was bicuspid in 29 patients. Twenty-nine patients had previous procedures, mostly balloon dilation of the aortic valve (n = 8) or surgical aortic valvotomy (n = 12). RESULTS: In all patients immediate results demonstrated a normally functioning neoaortic valve with not more than trivial aortic valve regurgitation. In the patients with stenosis, all levels of obstruction were relieved, and the gradient across the left ventricular outflow tract was completely abolished. Hospital mortality was 3 (5.6%) of 53 (overall Ross mortality was 34 of 260 [1.5%]). The patients were followed up for a mean of 4 years and up to 10 years. One patient died late of a noncardiac cause. Actuarial survival at 10 years was 94% plus minus 2%, and freedom from all events was 93% plus minus 5%. Only 1 patient needed autograft replacement for endocarditis. Intervention related to right ventricle-pulmonary artery conduit was required in 3 patients: balloon dilatation in 2, and reoperation in 1. At last follow-up, all patients but one were classified as being in New York Heart Association functional class I or II with normal or near-normal autograft valve function. Serial measurement of the left ventricular outflow tract and aortic root showed that as patients grew, the size of the outflow tract increased. When indexed to body surface area, this increase correlated with the patients' expected somatic growth. CONCLUSIONS: The Ross procedure for congenital aortic valve disease in children and young adults offers excellent hemodynamics, with the added advantage of real potential for growth. It should be considered the treatment of choice in this age group.     

Tricuspid valve replacement with a mitral homograft in children with rheumatic tricuspid valvulopathy

OBJECTIVE: Tricuspid valve replacement in children is associated with a nonnegligible complication rate because of specific disadvantages of mechanical or biologic prostheses. The objective of this study was to examine the midterm clinical outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement with a mitral homograft in 8 children with unreparable rheumatic tricuspid valve involvement. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2003, tricuspid valve replacement with a mitral homograft was performed in 8 patients (2 male and 6 female patients; mean age, 14.2 years) with rheumatic tricuspid valve disease. All patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV. In all patients with rheumatic valve disease, conservative operations had previously been performed on the tricuspid valve during concomitant left-sided surgical intervention. Mean follow-up was 56 +/- 12 months and was complete. RESULTS: There were no operative or late deaths. All patients were alive at the most recent follow-up contact and were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II. None of the patients required homograft-related reoperation. At the most recent echocardiograhic examination, 6 patients had trivial residual tricuspid regurgitation, and 2 had mild tricuspid regurgitation. None of the patients had maximal transvalvular tricuspid gradients greater than 2 mm Hg during their yearly follow-up visits. CONCLUSION: On the basis of our midterm results, tricuspid valve replacement with a mitral homograft in children seems to be a valuable alternative surgical option.     

Surgical Management of Marfan Syndrome in Children

Between August 1983 and January 1991, seven patients with Marfan syndrome underwent surgery for severe cardiovascular complications. The mean age at presentation was 5.7 months (range 4 to 9 months) in the infant group (n = 3), and 13.3 years (range 10 to 16 years) in a group of older children (n = 4). The primary indications for surgery in the infant group (performed at a mean of 3 years after diagnosis) were ascending aortic aneurysm with valvar regurgitation in one patient, and severe mitral valve prolapse with regurgitation in two. In the older group, surgical indications (performed at a mean of 2.8 years after diagnosis) were ascending aortic aneurysm with valvar regurgitation in three patients and acute aortic dissection in one. For aortic surgery, a composite valved conduit was used in four patients, and an aortic homograft in one. For mitral valve surgery, mechanical prostheses were used. Ail patients survived the primary operation. Over a mean follow-up of 17.5 patient-years (range 1 to 9 years), two patients in the infant Marfan group went on to further successful surgery (prosthetic mitral valve replacement and aortic root repair with aortic homograft) at a mean interval of 4.3 years after the Initial surgery. Our results suggest that the major cardiovascular risk factors of Marfan syndrome in the young, even in those diagnosed during infancy, have been favorably changed by surgery with an encouraging medium-term outlook. The correct timing of surgery is aided by echocardiography. (J Card Surg 1994;9:50–54)     

What are the limits for the Ross operation?

The Ross operation is physiologically the best approach for aortic valve replacement. At the Hospital de Santa Cruz 22 consecutive pulmonary autograft operations have been performed in patients with a mean age of 49 (range 17–65) years. Six patients had mitral valve disease, two had aortic aneurysms and one had a ventricular septal defect. Subcoronary implantation of the autograft was performed in 20 patients. A partial inclusion aortic root replacement technique was used in one and the aortic root was replaced in another. There were no hospital or late deaths. Two patients required autograft replacement at 3 and 9 months postoperatively because of regurgitation. One of these cases was caused by an abnormality of the pulmonary valve and since then echocardiographic assessments of this valve have been performed routinely and have detected significant pulmonary incompetence in four patients who otherwise would have been operated on using the Ross procedure. Copyright 2 1996 The International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery.